411MMA Fact or Fiction 08.13.08: Penn Doesn't Deserve Welterweight Title Shot, Affliction Should Avoid Signing Tito Ortiz, Florian is the #1 Lightweight Contender and More!
Posted by Bren Oliver on 08.13.2008
Will "Rampage" spend more than six months in jail based on the most recent developments in his case? Should Brock Lesnar be favored against the bulk of the UFC's Heavyweights? Would Carlos Condit only be "above average" if he fought in the Octagon? 411Mania MMA's Scott Kuczkowski and Jeremy Lambert discuss these topics and more in this week's FoF extravaganza!
Wednesday has arrived and it's time once again for another edition of your favorite 411Mania MMA column starting with "Fact" and ending with "Fiction"! UFC 87 is still fresh on the minds of many - Brock Lesnar's brute strength and ground control, Ken Florian doing his best Lyoto Machida impression against Huerta, Jon Fitch's display of heart and tenacity, and, of course, Georges St. Pierre once again proving why he is mentioned as perhaps the best pound-for-pound Mixed Martial Artist in the sport. Still, while the build for UFC 87 seemed to imply the PPV would be packed with pyrotechnics, the triumvirate of headlining fights resulting in unanimous decisions had some people wishing Zuffa had hired a production unit from China to digitally add a few fireworks to the in-ring action. After all, who doesn't like to see a fight finished?
This week, 411Mania's Jeremy Lambert ("Cardio Freak MMA News Report") and Scott Kuczkowski ("The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly) are breaking down a few items related to UFC 87, as well as a couple other items peeking the curiousity of quite a few folks. Also, if you're interested in checking out some pictures of a little post-87 BBQ at Roger Huerta's house (including images of a certain "That 70s Show" star in attendance at the intimate gathering), head on over CombatLifestyle and check out the work of Tracy Lee...who I also happened to interview this past week. That being said, it's time to transition from the curves of Ms. Lee to this week's sexy six "Fact or Fiction" topics.
Fellow columnists...are you ready? Then, America, with an enlarged heart and an empty skull, I say unto you the words of my Uncle...
ALLEZ FACT OR FICTION!!!!!!!
1. You expect Quinton Jackson to spend more than six months behind bars based on his felony charges in California and the recent news one of his victims had a miscarriage.
Jeremy Lambert:FICTION. You can throw the news about the miscarriage out the window because California can't legally charge him with any type of manslaughter since they don't consider fetuses people. The worst thing he'll face there is a civil case where, worst case scenario, he'll pay the woman for damages. How you put a price on losing a future child is beyond me but that's thankfully something I don't have to determine.
The only way this turns ugly for Jackson is if the judge decides to make an example out of his for being a cage fighter and taking up "human cock fighting". I'd like to think that the California judges don't look down on the sport and are well educated but I'm not that naive either. As long as Jackson pleads guilty, minds his manners in court, shows remorse, and says that it won't happen again, then he'll probably get off with some lost cash and probation.
Scott Kuczkowski:FICTION. We all know about what happened to Rampage, so I'm not going to try and rehash everything. Dana White said the problems weren't mental, but because he didn't sleep or eat for days and was surviving on energy drinks to the point that he had delirium. Now, I'm not a doctor, but doing those things makes me think he has some mental issues. Be that as it may, and despite how horrible things have turned out for some of the parties involved, I doubt we will see Rampage go to prison for a six month stretch. Could Rampage end up doing some jail time? Possibly, but I don't see it being more than 30 to 90 days at the most (and I would think that is a TOUGH sentence). The miscarriage issue will probably be something that he will have to confront in a civil suit; I'm not sure criminal charges will be pursued because of it. I'm sure his defense will be that he suffered from delirium and the incident was the result of his diminished capacity at the time it occurred. He'll probably lose his license, pay a fine, and maybe some other stuff. Like I said, I seriously doubt he will get sentenced to a six month stretch.
SCORE:1 for 1. I think it's more likely a judge in California is likely to take it easy on "Rampage" Jackson, at least based on the State's record when it comes to the treatment of celebrities, and I agree the miscarriage issue will not play a significant role in the criminal proceedings. However, I can't say Jackson partying in Minnesota after UFC 87 (as he did) is necessarily the best idea given the fact we're less than a month removed from the incident in Newport Beach.
2. Signing Tito Ortiz to a huge contract would be a poor business move for Affliction.
Jeremy Lambert:FACT. Especially if it's "the biggest contract ever" like Ortiz is claiming. Affliction already lost a ton of money on their first show because they paid guys like Ben Rothwell $300,000. They're already asked a lot of their fighters to take a 50% pay cut and no sane fighter making more than he's worth is going to take that deal. Ortiz is 0-2-1 in his last three fights and hasn't finished anyone not named Shamrock in years. Can he sell PPVs? Sure, but will it be worth it? Is paying a guy 1 million dollars (and that's a minimum figure) worth an extra 100,000 (and that's an extremely high number) buys? This isn't even taking into account the fact that he'll probably be getting a percentage of the PPV revenue.
Tito Ortiz is a draw. But is Tito Ortiz a draw when he isn't attached to the UFC name and doesn't have an opponent to play off of? The top Light Heavyweights in Affliction are Rento Sobral and Lil Nog. Sobral is best known to most fans as the guy who lost to Chuck Liddell twice, and Lil Nog isn't really known at all. Outside of a fight with Fedor (never happening), the best Affliction option is Ortiz vs. Belfort, and I don't think we'll be seeing that one. They're losing money, they know they're losing money, and signing Ortiz to a contract bigger than his head would only further their problems.
Scott Kuczkowski:FACT. Despite the fact that I am not a fan of Tito Ortiz, I think this would be a poor business move. I think that in order for this to become a good business deal, Tito would have to be signed to a fight by fight contract or he would have to be solely a front man and not a fighter.
As a fighter, Tito's best days are behind him and he is no longer the unbeatable Light Heavyweight champion he was five years ago. Tito's style has gone stale and he's not very dynamic in the ring/cage anymore. Bringing him in for one fight at a time would be a good option for Affliction, as they will be able to gauge his affect on their PPV buy rates. Signing him to a huge contract and ultimately not seeing any impact on their buy rates would be foolish.
Hiring Tito as a front man or "mouth piece" might be the better option. Tito is great at hyping a fight, so why not let him hype the entire event. The majority of the media enjoys working with Tito, so he can probably push the Affliction name into untapped media outlets. Even with this option, signing him to a huge contract would probably be a mistake.
Another issue with signing Tito to a huge contract is that Affliction did a lousy job of promoting Banned. If that same poor promotional plan is used for their future PPVs, no one will even know Tito is in Affliction.
The biggest problem with promising Tito a lot of money is that Tito has a big mouth and isn't afraid to shoot it off to the press. He did it while under contract with the UFC. Well, let's just suppose that Affliction signs Tito to a huge contact and promises him the moon, but then has to cut his pay due to poor PPV revenues. How long do you think it would take for Tito to start bitching about Affliction to the press and the money they owe him?
SCORE:2 for 2. With EliteXC having financial woes, and Ortiz expecting a ridiculous sum from Affliction, I can't help but think that Dana White is out there somewhere, bald head gleaming, with a huge smile on his face and the word "f*ck* in his heart.
3. Carlos Condit may be a dominant champion in WEC, but would only be considered an above-average Welterweight if he fought in the UFC.
Jeremy Lambert:FICTION. This really depends on your breakdown of fighters. I like to keep things simple and keep fighters in one of five categories: can, below average, average, above average, world-class. If Carlos Condit were in the UFC he would be an average fighter. Above average UFC Welterweights are guys like Diego Sanchez, Josh Koscheck, Thiago Alves, ect.... If you match them up ten times, Condit is losing the majority of the time. Condit would likely be on the level of a Dustin Hazelett, who is an average UFC welterweight. The fight with Mirua showed that there's room for him to improve and given time, I'm sure he will but right now I don't see him beating many of the top UFC welterweights.
Scott Kuczkowski:FACT. I'm saying "fact", but it's not meant to sound as bad as this question makes it out to be. Condit is an excellent Welterweight, but the UFC has probably one of the most stacked Welterweight divisions on the planet. I think Condit would find a lot of success, but I don't think he would maintain his status as one of the "Top 10" Welterweights in the world after being dealt a few losses to guys like Alves or Koscheck. I think Condit would be above average as a UFC Welterweight, which means he could probably be a champion or top contender anywhere else, but I don't see him climbing any higher than above average in the UFC.
SCORE:2 for 3. Condit only an "average" UFC Welterweight? I don't believe Dustin Hazelett has beaten anyone on the level of Frank Trigg or even Brock Larson. Condit hasn't lost in two years, nor been to a decision since he and Jake Shields went the distance at a "Rumble on the Rock" event. He would absolutely be competitive against any of the UFC's top 170-pound fighters, and likely beat a few of them along the way, though of course he's out of luck when it comes to supplanting St. Pierre atop the division.
---SWITCH!!!---
4. BJ Penn does not deserve the opportunity to fight Georges St. Pierre for the UFC Welterweight Championship.
Scott Kuczkowski:FICTION. I think BJ does deserve an opportunity, but I must admit I would rather see him defend his title a few more times before trying to avenge losses against guys in other weight classes. I think that right now we are seeing the best BJ Penn and the best Georges St. Pierre, so this fight totally makes sense from the standpoint that folks want to see who is pound for pound better. I guess an argument could be made that BJ Penn should have to fight some of the other Welterweight contenders before facing GSP, but I can't think of a contender whose title shot will be put on hold for this fight.
Jeremy Lambert:FACT. To be honest, I don't think GSP thinks Penn deserves the title shot either. After his fight with Fitch, GSP just can't saying, "I want to fight whoever deserves the title shot" and he never really had the demeanor of a guy who wanted to face BJ Penn. He's obviously not scared of Penn since he's fought him before and he beat him. I just think he doesn't believe Penn has earned the title shot. Penn is 0-2 in his last two Welterweight fights and I don't think it's right for him to leap frog a guy like Thiago Alves, who would easily earn a title shot should he beat Diego Sanchez.
Dana White has always said, "guys can move up or down when they clean out their division" and has BJ Penn really cleaned out the Lightweight division? So far he's defeated Jens Pulver, Joe Stevenson, and Sean Sherk. That's not really cleaning out the division in my mind. Is Penn a class above pretty much every Lightweight in the UFC? Sure, but that doesn't mean he shouldn't prove it. I think a fighter should defend the title three times before they decided to move up in weight classes. That gives you one win over the champion at the time and three wins over the second best fighter in your division. If you don't defend it three times, drop the belt and don't put the division on ice for a number of months. Penn vs. GSP is a big fight and a money fight but it shouldn't happen just because the words, "29-28 St. Pierre, 29-28 Penn, and 29-28 for your winner.....GEORGES "RUSH" ST. PIERRRRREEEE!" haunt him every night.
SCORE:2 for 4. While I love the notion of two phenoms like St. Pierre and Penn squaring off against each other, regardless of their previous fight's outcome, the UFC needs to consider the other deserving athletes in each weight class and how valuable their company's championships are. If this fight absolutely must go down before the end of 2008, I'm hoping the UFC creates some sort of bullsh*t interim title to allow St. Pierre and Penn a chance to potentially go five full rounds without affecting the actual Welterweight/Lightweight Championships.
5. Kenny Florian should be considered the top contender in the UFC Lightweight Division.
Scott Kuczkowski:FACT. Absolutely Florian has earned himself a spot at the top of the division. Kenny has two losses in the UFC; one to Diego Sanchez as a Middleweight and one to Sean Sherk. With the exception of Sherk and Huerta, none of Florian's fights have ever gone to the judges. Right now he is on a five fight winning streak after beating the likes of Dokonjonosuke Mishima, Alvin Robinson, Din Thomas, Joe Lauzon, and Roger Huerta. Aside from having to fight Sean Sherk again, I don't know what more could be asked of him. The distance between Penn at #1 and Florian at #2 might be pretty wide, but I definitely think KenFlo can claim that spot.
Jeremy Lambert:FACT. Who else is there? Every other top UFC Lightweight either has a blemish on their record against a top contender or they haven't beaten a top contender. Tyson Griffin lost to Frank Edgar, Frank Edgar lost to Gray Maynard, Clay Guida has losses to Huerta and Griffin, Stevenson and Sherk already have losses to Penn, so who's left? The UFC Lightweight division is a stacked division but no one is really separating themselves from the pack like Florian has down. Since his loss to Sherk, Florian has won five straight fights and has finished in four of them. FLORIAN FINISHES FIGHTS! Love him or hate him, the guy just seems to win.
SCORE:3 for 5. I have a feeling we may see Florian vs. the winner of Sherk/Griffin as a means to determining a clear-cut top contender while also allowing time for BJ Penn to fatten back up and compete against St. Pierre.
6. Based on his performance at UFC 87, Brock Lesnar should be favored against every other UFC Heavyweight he faces (other than champ "Minotauro" Nogueira).
Scott Kuczkowski:FICTION. ...but I say that only based on what I saw at UFC 87. Brock demonstrated that strength-wise, he will probably never meet an equal inside the Octagon. He also demonstrated a very good wrestling base, some decent striking, and a great deal of top control. What Brock lacks is greater use of back control, refined striking skills, and submissions. Without those three things, he will be forced to pound out victories as opposed to finishing, thus allowing his opponents 15 minutes to try and unravel his game plan. Brock was able to smother Herring, but Herring has traditionally had difficulties getting big wrestlers off of him. Brock can rely on those types of victories for only so long. There are several fighters out there who can conceivably come up with the right game plan to shut Brock down. If Brock Lesnar improves and can learn some jiu-jitsu, I would have to change my answer to fact.
Jeremy Lambert:FICTION. Only because I think he'd be favored against Nogueira as well. Lesnar, having one and two professional fights, was favored against Mir and Herring so the more experience he gets, the more he'll continued to be favored. Let me be clear, I'm going by Vegas odds here. I think most people would favor Nog if they fought tomorrow but I think Vegas would favor Lesnar. Unless Lesnar just goes on some type of losing streak, Vegas is going to favor him in every fight from here on out because he's had 3 professional fights and he's only going to get better.
SCORE:4 for 6. You're a slippery fish, Mr. Lambert, but you make a good point. From now on, I'll clarify "favored" as either being in the eyes of fans, bookies, or both. I see Lesnar stumbling against Heavyweights who are extremely versed in jiujitsu (Mir, Nogueira, Werdum, etc.), as there aren't any athletes in his division who I see as having sharp enough striking to test his chin outside of perhaps Gabriel Gonzaga. Sorry, Kongo fans, but your boy got outwrestled by Carmello Marrero and smothered by Heath Herring. There's little doubt in my mind Lesnar will handle him if they fight.
----
Join us next week when two more participants discuss Brock Lesnar's post-fight antics towards Heath Herring, Dana White's comments about the signing of "Cro Cop" as a means to bring down PRIDE, Jon Fitch's next move, and a few other issues lingering out there in the land o' MMA...
Meh, just not a big believer in Condit. I'm probably putting too much stock in his last fight (as I tend to do) but if he fights like that against the top UFC Welterweights, I don't like his chances. I'd like to see him in the UFC though just to see how he would do. Would make for some fun fights at the very least.
And Dustin Hazelett will be a future UFC champion. Write that down. I know that has nothing to do with who he's beat, just a comment.
I like that Scott and I agreed on the Lesnar question for completely different reasons.
Posted By: Jeremy Lambert (Registered) on August 12, 2008 at 11:44 PM
Personally I think Brock would steamroll Mir if they fought again. Brock learned a lot from that fight, and I'm pretty sure he'd just keep the second fight standing. Mir wouldn't be able to do ANYTHING against Lesnar on his feet.
Posted By: Anon (Guest) on August 13, 2008 at 12:34 AM
Hazelett is not an average UFC fighter by a longshot. He lost his UFC debut as a 20 year old to a very experienced Tony DeSouza and he lost recently to top5 WW Josh Koscheck. But he has 4 octagon wins and looks to be gaining speed.
In his last fight he threw an amazing flying armbar on Burkman after showing some fantastic rubberguard work. In Burkman, Hazelett stopped a guy whose only other stoppage UFC loss was to Jon Fitch. This was the same Burkman who neither Swick or Karo could finish. An average fighter does not do that. (Just look at Burkman's losses (Hazelett, Swick, Karo, Fitch, Horn, Horwich(in his first fight)) That is not a list of average fighters.
And Hazelett is only 22 years old. His jits are sick, his striking is improving vastly, he uses his length and lankiness well, and in his interviews he clearly is a very intelligent fighter. In talking with Rogan after his last win Hazelett clearly was very methodical and cerebral in his game, which can be rare for young fighters of his caliber (think of Diaz, Sanchez, Karo, Lawler - all hit the big time young and are much more emotional fighters)
I know I sound like a shill, but I think if Hazelett continues to grow as a fighter he should be at the very least a title contender in the next 3 years.
Posted By: Matt (Guest) on August 13, 2008 at 02:12 AM
For Jeremy Lambert: Brock wasn't favored against Herring in Vegas.
Posted By: Romeo (Guest) on August 13, 2008 at 07:13 AM
1. Fiction.
If this were ANY other state (Except... maybe Texas) then this would be fact. But since this is California, the land where celebs of all levels get slaps on the wrist for the most heinous of actions, I expect Rampage to not even see the inside of a prison cell (Post trial I mean).
2. Fact.
The key word there is "Big". Signing Tito to a contract is a good move for them... but not a "Big" one. Affliction needs all the name recognition it can get so that they can hopefully get PPV Buys... and we all know the chance to See Tito get his butt kicked = Buys!
BUT, not if Affliction stands to lose huge money every time he fights... that's just not good business. Plus... correct me, when was the last Time Tito won a fight with someone NOT named Shamrock? Almost 2 1/2 years ago.
Do I need to go here? Didn't think so.
3. Fact. But...
While Condit may be one of the top WW fighters, can he really hang with guys like Alves, Koscheck, Diego, or one of my new favorite fighters, Jon Fitch... then of course there is GSP who is in a WW Class of his own.
While Condit may not be on this TOP tier of the WW division, he is certainly "Above Average" and can beat most of the remaining WW's on the UFC roster. So Yes, he would be an Above Average UFC WW, but not much higher then that.
4. Fiction.
I am sorry. I like Penn BUT, is it really fair to give someone who hasn't fought at WW in almost 2 years, and hasn't WON at WW in Over 4 Years (5/22/04) a shot at the Title? Of course not! BJ needs to show he can win at WW again before I can even entertain giving him a shot at GSP and the WW Title.
Now, If this were just a 3 Round non-title fight, I would be ok with that... but since title fights = buys, I have go with Fiction all the way here.
5. Fact.
KenFlo has earned his opportunity... he has won 5 fights in a row, and beat the guy who won 5 times last year. (Should have negotiated that new contract BEFORE the fight eh Roger?) But unfortunately, Kenny will not get it... at least, not now. I completely agree with Bren that the Winner of Sherk/Tyson Griffin will get Florian for the #1 contender spot.
6. Fiction... for now.
I agree with Scott here. If (And he will if he is taking fighting in the UFC seriously) Lesnar can learn some Jiu-Jitsu, then this answer will become Fact. For now though, Brock can oly rely on his 3XL-Sized "Canned Hams" aka his fists to get fights finished... and he will need more then that if he wants to make it long term in MMA.
Another great column. See ya next week.
Posted By: FoF Fanatic (Guest) on August 13, 2008 at 10:20 AM
Affliction would make a huge mistake signing Tito, styles make fights, and there isn't a stylistic match for Tito in Affliction that wouldn't hurt the promotion, not to mention he's coming off a couple of losses in the UFC, he basically lost his name, and it would be hard to earn a reputation off guys who aren't
Posted By: josh (Guest) on August 13, 2008 at 12:00 PM
As for submitting Brock: unless they go for a leglock, I see Brock breaking free of any armbar like he did with Mir. Good luck wrapping your arm around his neck, especially if you're being pummeled while your trying to get a hold of it. Like I said before, it's possible Brock chose not to try for a submission against heath for fear of a possible reversal and most importantly, SECURING THE WIN.
Posted By: El Duro (Guest) on August 13, 2008 at 12:35 PM
BJ Penn is definitely the best in the Lightweight class in UFC. But when BJ goes up a weight class, dont get me wrong he will still be a badass, I think the extra pounds slow him down. GSP is unstoppable and will beat down a pudgy BJ.
Posted By: PhunkyPhresh (Guest) on August 13, 2008 at 12:45 PM
1. It has nothing to do with his celeb status... California is that lenient for everyone. Their jails are already so overcrowded with gangs, drug lords, murderers and other "real criminals" that they have no room (or care) for anyone else. Even if the judge were to be hard on Rampage and give him a year in prison- I'd expect to see him out within a month on "good behavior"... not because he's a celebrity, but because he's a Californian.
2. Fiction...depending on how huge a contract and his full role with it. Affliction had 2 major problems with Banned which resulted in low buys. The first and obvious one was that they didn't advertise nearly enough. The second was that even if they were to advertise everywhere- the casual fans had no clue who anyone was... minus Sylvia and Arlovski (who they'd only know as boring fighters). Tito is one of the few people who could change both. So what if Tito hasn't finished anyone outside of Ken? Ken Shamrock is also a known name. To the casual fan, hype > talent. Ask someone on the street who the most feared HW in the world is for proof...
3. Fact. Nothing I can say that Scott hasn't already. He's good, but there are too many others in the UFC.
4. Fact. Personal vendettas are no reason to put a stacked division on hold for a year. If BJ wants the fight so bad, then he should have to earn it. Have him fight more then once every 7 so months or at least have him face a contender first. He's done nothing in the WW division but lose and then he dropped weight and beat other guys who lost in the WW division and decided to lose weight.
5. Fact... if only for lack of contenders.
6. Fiction. He did nothing to show that he's better equipped against a BJJ artist. Ignoring Vegas odds, I wouldn't have him favored against Mir (if they were to fight again), Gonzaga, or Werdum.
On a side note- it's saddening to see that racist comments are accepted by the moderators with MBD's post.
Posted By: cyks (Registered) on August 13, 2008 at 12:46 PM
1 - fiction - the details of the case do not point towards a criminal case developing
2 - fact - Tito isn't worth a ridiculous contract at this stage in his career...the only fight that would be marketable for him that i can think of would be a rematch with frank shamrock.
3 - fact - sort of...he's still not much above a hot prospect...the kid needs to show more against better competition
4- FICTION - BJ deserves the fight. When boxing champs move up, they're eligible for the title of their new weight class, and it's the same in mma. People that bring up his record as a welterweight are looking at this the wrong way...and as for those pissed that the titles are being held up..grow up. This isn't pro wrestling where titles need to be defended once a month. If the ufc would just allow top contender matches to go five rounds this wouldn't even be an issue...but yeah, anyone that thinks that a top five consensus p4p fighter doesn't deserve a shot at the title in the weight class above him is ridiculous.
MMA fans in general put too much importance on these belts...no, if bj loses it does not devalue the belt...no, if bj vacates the belt, it does not devalue the belt...the belt is as important as the man wearing it.
5 - fiction - since losing to sherk, florian has defeated Mishima, Robinson, Din Thomas, lauzon and Huerta...not exactly a murderer's row... is he deserving a title shot? sure, but i wouldn't say that he's more deserving a title shot than Griffin or Sherk.
6 - fiction. I'd have a tough time favoring brock against any bjj blackbelt...time will tell if he improves, but i'm excited by brock's prospects.
Posted By: romano (Guest) on August 13, 2008 at 01:19 PM
For Romeo: Brock was listed at -240 while Herring was +190. That favors Brock.
Posted By: Jeremy Lambert (Registered) on August 13, 2008 at 02:32 PM
Condit is a great fighter and the fact that everyone always tries to measure everyone up to UFC fighters , like there are no other leagues, is ridiculous. I think The Natural Born Killer would do alot better than a lot of you "experts" think. take it back to Rumble On the Rock. Renato Verissimo comes in as the favorite and gets KO's in 20 seconds. His striking is not as good as his grappling yet he has KO power. He went the distance with Shields (who is awesome) and beat Twinkle Toes. The ratings system is flawed because a lot of the best fighters in the same weight classes will never fight due to being in different organizations. people that do not believe prob dont know what this guy is capable of. Im not saying he could beat GSP, but Im also not saying he wouldnt show up and have a great fight. I dont understand how hazletts name even comes up in the same class.
Posted By: guest (Guest) on August 13, 2008 at 03:05 PM
" If the ufc would just allow top contender matches to go five rounds this wouldn't even be an issue"
That's decided by the state athletic commissions as defined by the unified rules, not the UFC.
Posted By: Tonley (Registered) on August 13, 2008 at 03:44 PM
I just got into MMA around UFC 86 but my favorite fighter is Brock Lesnar not because I banwagon but because I followed his work in WWE and its easier for me to connect with MMA through him
Posted By: Blackmachismo92 (Registered) on August 13, 2008 at 05:00 PM
Brock didn't go for a submission A) because he didn't want to get caught and lose stupidly like against Mir, B) his friggen arms are too huge to choke Herring, did you see him try the guillotine in the first round? His biceps were bigger than Herring's fat, swollen head.
C) Herring talked too much crap and Brock wanted to embarrass him as much if not more than beat him. Look at the 3rd round. Brock was looking for a German. He almost had it with 3 minutes left, then Herring dove back into the turtle shell until the final moments. The fact he was looking for a German means that he wasn't even worried that Herring could hurt him in the slightest.
Posted By: aj (Guest) on August 13, 2008 at 09:38 PM
"" If the ufc would just allow top contender matches to go five rounds this wouldn't even be an issue"
That's decided by the state athletic commissions as defined by the unified rules, not the UFC. "
Whatever...whomever makes the call should make that one.
Posted By: romano (Guest) on August 14, 2008 at 08:09 AM
Copyright � 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.