www.411mania.com
|  News |  Columns |  Reports |  Video Reviews |  Title History |  News Report |
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// Kelly Brook Gets Glamorously Sexy For Fabulous Magazine
MUSIC
// First Official Pics of Beyonce and Jay-Z With Blue Ivy Posted
WRESTLING
// [VIDEO] Torrie Wilson & Sable Strip Down & Kiss In Lingerie Contest
POLITICS
// Obama Showing Strongest Poll Numbers In Months
MMA
// XFC 16: High Stakes Report 2.10.12
GAMES
// Star Trek Sequel Game in the Works


SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds





Follow 411mania on Twitter!




Add 411 On Facebook
 



 
 411mania » MMA » Columns



Advertisement
Hit the Mat 03.23.09: Trends in the Sport
Posted by Matt McEwen on 03.23.2009



It is a sport of skill, a sport of toughness, a sport of dedication. But, maybe more than anything else, MMA is a sport of trends.

These trends are often a sign of the next evolution of the sport. Back at UFC 1 in 1993, when nearly everyone in North American thought the kickboxer or the brawler would beat everyone, unimposing little Royce Gracie stepped up and showed what a ground game could do for someone. Showcasing the skill of Brazilian Jiu Jitsu was the original goal behind the UFC, and considering that Jiu Jitsu training is now one of the four cornerstones of the sport, it certainly did it's job.

But, time would prove that just as punching and kicking didn't have all the answers, competition would prove that BJJ was great, but not perfect. The next trend that popped up was the dominance of Greco-Roman and freestyle wrestling. Competitors like Dan Severn opened the door, and then future legends like Mark Coleman and Randy Couture busted through to show something that continues to be true today - high level wrestling is probably the best base skill to enter MMA with and develop from.

So, enough with the history lesson. What is the trend that I want to talk about now? What is the trend I see as the dominant one in the sport right now?

The sprawl and brawl.

If you are not entirely sure what is meant by that cutesy little rhyming title, it is the reliance on basic wrestling skill to keep fights up and on the feet. Part of the reason for this is obvious strategy - if your opponent wants to take you down, maybe you should not let him

But part of this is also the audience. While a large group of fans enjoy the ground game as much as the stand up (and thus get horny for the likes of Damien Maia), just as many fans still expect to see two guys stand toe to toe in a just above barrroom level brawl. These fans, possibly because of beer intake, are often very loud at shows, and thus make it clear that they really enjoy the fists, and are probably the reason a guy like Pete Sell keeps getting televised. UFC 96 was a pretty clear example of this as many fights were contested nearly entirely on the feet and there were no submissions recorded at all. Who do I blame for this?

Chuck Liddell.

You see, Liddell was the first guy to really use his wrestling as a counter weapon. Certainly no where near the level of the higher lever wrestlers who entered the sport, Liddell instead utilized his skills to avoid being taken down, stay on his feet and force opponents to open up and be susceptible to his brutal counter punching. He learned his lesson early on, as his first career loss was to Jeremy Horn, and it occurred on the ground.. Wanting to avoid that again, Liddell concentrated on his strengths, and while it was a style that created some boring fights, they often ended with highlight reel KO's. Add in a wide mohawk, a good personality and allegedly hand picked opponents, and Liddell managed to become one of the UFC's and MMA's first true superstars, guaranteeing a legion of fans....and followers.

No, I'm not saying that everyone wants to be Liddell and are mimicking his Kenpo style. What I am saying is that success breeds imitation and many fighters who grew up watching Liddell - and yes, he has been around long enough to say that - have taken the cue from him and managed to use limited wrestling skill (and in some cases elite skills) to keep fights standing up. It's gotten to the point where competitors like Josh Koscheck seem to have given up on wrestling and instead have become B-level K1 fighters.

It certainly has led many fighters to success. Rampage Jackson has a wrestling base, but instead of looking to ground and pound fighters, he has instead been using superior counter punching to do damage on his feet. He rode that style to a Light Heavyweight title. The current champion of that division, Rashad Evans, has also foregone his wrestling skills at times and become a stand up striker. Unfortunately though, the results aren't always esthetically pleasing - I could do without having watched Sean Sherk and Tyson Griffin box for three rounds.

But I digress. It was a successful style that Liddell popularized, and as such the sprawl and brawl style has become another important aspect in the evolution of MMA.

But what will be the next step?

Using the success breeds imitation theory, you could look at three or four fighters that are currently at the top of their games. Anderson Silva is about as dynamic a striker as there is, and is wildly popular among martial artists. He is exciting to watch while at the same time being dominant. The only problem is that not many people possess he natural skills to do what he does. Where Liddell was able to utilize a strategy to focus on his strengths and avoid his weakness, it is not yet clear that Silva has much in the way of weaknesses, as he has won fights in every way imaginable. Also, his striking might not be a strength he uses to avoid the ground game, but rather just so dominant that he does not have to use it. So, while it would be nice to see an army of Silva's enter the sport, it is kind of unlikely to envision.

Fedor is the best heavyweight in the world, but is relatively unknown to a wide swatch of the world since he has never been in the UFC (this is sad, but this is also true. Sorry Affliciton.) He is another guy like Silva in a way though - incredibly skilled, it seems a lot of his success is based on inner toughness and pulling through beatings....not exactly a trail too many aspiring fighters can/would do.

How about Brock Lesnar? A return to dominant wrestling? He is wildly popular, but I think the line up of genetically freaky humans looking to enter the sport is limited.

And that brings me to Georges St. Pierre. One of the most well rounded fighters in the sport, the French Canadian is wildly popular and successful. This is a good combination to be emulated, and so is his skill set. A strong wrestler, St. Pierre can take just about anyone down, but he is also a good striker with a strong clinch game, not to mention good submissions if he needs them. It's not only St. Pierre that is having success by utilizing a strong all around game though. Fighters like Forrest Griffin, BJ Penn, Lyoto Machida (you didn't think I'd go a whole article without mentioning him did you?) and Kenny Florian have all shown varied skill sets that not only excite fans but win them fights as well.

But, there is one trend that could very well be even more important that any skill possessed by the fighters themselves. As the sport has evolved, the strategies available to fighters have as well. The two most successful camps in the sport right now - those of Greg Jackson and Randy Couture - rely as much on smart game planning as they do on the skills of the fighters themselves to gain success. More than anything else, they've shown that you can not go into a fight relying on just your own skills and a "I'm tougher than him" attitude and expect to do well against the elite of the sport. More smaller fight teams and trainers have already taken notice, and game planning is one part of the sport that is definitely changing with the times.


Post Comment (13)  |  Email Matt McEwen  |  View Matt McEwen's 411 Profile

  Send To Friend  |    Stumble It!  |    Digg It!  | 



Please add your comment below.
If you are registered, you can login and post under your registered name. If not, you can post as a guest or register.

* Please note that 411 moderates all comments. Your comment will show up on the site after it has been approved by an editor.
 
Name : 
Comment : 
Remaining Characters : 
2800
 

Comments (13)

 
All of the current belt holders (with the exception of Penn) happen to have another thing in common- a trend that also generally comes from the wrestlers and Matt Hughes was one of the best at for a while... serious weight cutting.

Each of the title holders (again, minus Penn) show up to a fight generally significantly larger then their opponents... often weighing (as much as) 20-25 lbs more then their weight class limit come fight time.

Needless to say, skill being almost equal, the bigger/ stronger guy will win.

If a fighter can't cut significant weight, he's at a serious disadvantage.


Posted By: cyks (Guest)  on March 22, 2009 at 11:21 PM

 
 
Hell, if Penn wanted to own a divison, he should try dropping to Feather. Who wouldnt love to see Penn/Faber, or Penn/Brown (I would).

Or, if he really is moving up, Penn/Torres?


Posted By: CyberFreq (Guest)  on March 22, 2009 at 11:50 PM

 
 
The clinch is probably another trend you can talk about also related to sprawl and brawl

Posted By: Guest#2839 (Guest)  on March 23, 2009 at 05:23 AM

 
 
I tend to disagree with the first part of your column - I think the Sprawl and Brawl era is over, and it ended when Rashad Evans knocked Chuck Liddell out. The point of your article is certainly very true, I just feel that it's about two years past its expiration date, ever since Liddell began his slide. I suppose it's only fitting, because Chuck started that particular epoch with his dominance of Tito Ortiz (and I suppose GSP or Alves finished the "dominant wrestler" era by making Hughes look completely irrelevant, him (Matt Hughes) being the last dominant wrestler/champion.

As far as Brock Lesnar is concerned, I think you'll see more guys like him, more guys like Shane Carwin, guys with fists the size of mailboxes, but it won't be a trend throughout the whole sport - guys like that are only found in one division, and I feel that it's going to lead to a heavyweight renaissance, and a boom period for MMA. Look no further than boxing to see how well a sport can do when it has a compelling heavyweight division.


Posted By: Wyatt (Guest)  on March 23, 2009 at 08:15 AM

 
 
"I tend to disagree with the first part of your column - I think the Sprawl and Brawl era is over, and it ended when Rashad Evans knocked Chuck Liddell out. The point of your article is certainly very true, I just feel that it's about two years past its expiration date, ever since Liddell began his slide. I suppose it's only fitting, because Chuck started that particular epoch with his dominance of Tito Ortiz (and I suppose GSP or Alves finished the "dominant wrestler" era by making Hughes look completely irrelevant, him (Matt Hughes) being the last dominant wrestler/champion.

Posted By: Wyatt (Guest) on March 23, 2009 at 08:15 AM"
_______________________________________

I'd love to know how you consider the sprawl and brawl era over, when all of the current champions (sans Penn) use it to win.

GSP or Alves didn't finish the "dominant wrestler" era- they just became bigger, stronger, and better wrestlers then Hughes... or rather, in the case of Alves, he learned excellent take down defense to keep the fight where he wanted it , ie- Sprawl and Brawl.


Dominant wrestler era is over?
..Brock Lesnar, Rashad Evans, and GSP would probably disagree.

When 3 out of the 5 UFC champions have very strong wrestling, I don't see how you can call it an end to the "wrestling era."


Posted By: cyks (Guest)  on March 23, 2009 at 10:39 AM

 
 
All of the current belt holders (with the exception of Penn) happen to have another thing in common- a trend that also generally comes from the wrestlers and Matt Hughes was one of the best at for a while... serious weight cutting.

Each of the title holders (again, minus Penn) show up to a fight generally significantly larger then their opponents... often weighing (as much as) 20-25 lbs more then their weight class limit come fight time.

Needless to say, skill being almost equal, the bigger/ stronger guy will win.

If a fighter can't cut significant weight, he's at a serious disadvantage.

Posted By: cyks (Guest) on March 22, 2009 at 11:21 PM

werd i totally agree with this, i wish someone would write a article on weight cuts in MMA... and what not. its very hard to explain to my gf on why ppl do it and how its allowed.


Posted By: wylung (Guest)  on March 23, 2009 at 11:45 AM

 
 
Nice atrcile Matt.. I think you forgot to mention Cro Cop as one of the Sprawl and Brawl artists. There was a time where he was actually tough to take down.

Posted By: Samer Kadi (Registered)  on March 23, 2009 at 12:32 PM

 
 
So lay and pray, ground and pound, and now sprawl and brawl?

Posted By: CyberFreq (Guest)  on March 23, 2009 at 02:35 PM

 
 
Actually I also agree that the "era" of sprawl and brawl is long gone too.

The difference between then and now, is that in Chuck's day, that was what he was primarily known for - using his wrestling to defend against the takedown whilst going for strikes. Guys like crocop, and to a lesser degree, wanderlei also used similar tactics. The thing though was that was pretty much their main strategy.

Today's era is more about the complete fighter able to adjust styles, tactics, and strategies in accords to their opponent. For instance the examples you give as "sprawl and brawl" for the champs aren't really sprawl n brawl fighters at all. GSP can beat you standing, on the ground w/ subs or via GnP - he adjusts his fight style to his opponent. Andersen Silva is a MT guy who can also submit and sweep from his back and is comfortable whereever the fight is. Rashad didn't win his last fights was "sprawl and brawl" he beat Chuck purley with strikes and he beat forrest with GnP.

The era of "sprawl and brawl" suggested that the fighter was more comfortable standing but was able to utilize their skills to *keep* is standing. The fighters (and champs) of today are equally comfortable on the ground or on their feet and ready for the fight to go anywhere rather than being desperate to keep the fight where they need it to be to win.

I think more than anything, it's just the end of one-dimensional fighters like Chuck, crocop, or others.


Posted By: soo (Guest)  on March 23, 2009 at 03:17 PM

 
 
Thank you, soo, for explaining what I meant in better detail. Sprawl and Brawl, Lay and Pray, and Ground and Pound are all certainly effective parts of a fighter's skill set, but a fighter that focuses exclusively on one while neglecting others is going to get beat, 9 times out of 10.

And when I said the era of the "dominant wrestler" was over, I meant that in terms of guys that can only wrestle. Cyks, how many takedowns did Rashad, who's admittedly a great wrestler, attempt against Chuck and Forrest? Brock Lesnar, with his wrestling pedigree, could only manage a decision against Heath Herring, in a fight that he largely relied on his wrestling abilities, even after a huge punch in the first round rang Herring's bell. But against Couture, he utilized his striking, coupled with his size, to put Couture on the ground for the finish. When he took Couture down, Randy was able to get back up, but when he knocked him down, the fight was over. How many times did Brock sprawl in that fight to keep it standing?


Posted By: Wyatt (Guest)  on March 23, 2009 at 04:18 PM

 
 
I dont think Tyson vs Sherk was an example of fighters not utilizing their wrestling skills, but more of an example of equal talent in one area, so they both thought the others wrestling nullified the others, so in order to win decisively it needed to be settled with striking, which IMO was a very exciting fight. Sherk vs Penn on the other hand might be an example of when that tactic was used ineffectively

Posted By: merv (Guest)  on March 23, 2009 at 04:35 PM

 
 
Nice read! There's another possible trend we could soon see- the guys that use their standup mainly as a way to get to the submissions whether it's by takedowns or pulling guard. Maia and Hazelet are the two best examples I can think of, and if these two keep winning and get into title fights we could see this tactic really gain some steam.
To clear up any confusion, I am not talking about Royce Gracie style fighters that basically never plan on doing any standup damage, I'm talking about guys that swing like they mean it and use standup pressure to get the fight down.


Posted By: guest guest (Guest)  on March 23, 2009 at 05:40 PM

 
 
"When 3 out of the 5 UFC champions have very strong wrestling, I don't see how you can call it an end to the wrestling era."

I think you can call this point in time the end of all other eras and the beginning of a true mixed martial arts era. The prototypical fighter being GSP.


Posted By: Guest#9861 (Guest)  on March 23, 2009 at 05:57 PM

 


www.41mania.com
Copyright � 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.