Leveled Up News Report: 01.29.10
Posted by Joshua Richey on 01.29.2010
Mass Effect, Mass Effect, Mass Effect. The over/under for the number of times I say 'Mass Effect' in this News Report is 20. I would take the over if I were you. Elsewhere we have Apple unveiling the iPad, 2K Sports giving you a chance to win a million bucks, and a list of words that have been banned from the Rock Band Network.
So we meet again. I was able to pull myself away from Mass Effect 2 long enough to type you up another edition of the Leveled Up News Report. It wasn't easy. That game rocks my face off. More on that later, but first, how about we discuss some of the happenings that are going on in the gaming world...
[NOTE: It's been a slow news week. So I apologize ahead of time for the lame news items that I'm about to tell you about.]
Rock Band announces which words you can't use on the Rock Band Network
The Rock Band Network jumps into beta, with a comprehensive guide to offensive content featuring a list of "very naughty words." The offensive content guidelines at Creators.Rockband.com is quite an interesting read, giving examples of what words and references would give a song an M rating, which would keep it off the service, or a T rating, which is appropriate for release. The page begins by stressing that these are guidelines that can be stretched, depending on the circumstances, giving the example of offensive language being more tolerable in a heavy metal song than an easy listening tune.
Here are song characteristics that would warrant an M rating:
Any song that meets these criteria would not be allowed on the service. (via Kotaku)
I have nothing else to add to this. It's pretty much the greatest news story ever as it is.
Apple unveils large iPod Touch iPad
The device seems to serve as a middle ground between smartphones (an iPhone more specifically) and a laptop as the nearly 10-inch screen with a resolution of 1024 x 768 and will come in 26, 32 and 64GB flavors and run on a 1GHz processor. As expected, it will also be equipped with an accelerometer much like the iPhone/iPod Touch. Browsing the internet appeared to be quite fast and a virtual keyboard can be summoned at anytime. A seperate keyboard dock will also be available for those who wish to have a more traditional laptop-style interface.
On the downside, the iPad does not have a camera nor SMS capabilities and cannot handle multitasking. (via 411Mania)
I'm sure they'll deny it, but the Apple fanbase were hoping for a lot more than this. This is something that they've been begging for since before the iPhone was announced. All they wanted was a tablet that could run OS X. Instead they get a 9-inch iPod Touch.
The fact that this thing cannot multitask is a huge deal breaker. You can't run AIM as you browse the internet? Lame. Can't have Twitter open while you're writing the latest edition of the Leveled Up News Report? Lame.
The unfortunate thing is that this thing is still going to sell like crazy because Apple made it. Personally, the only use I would have for it would be to put it next to my toilet so that I could browse RedTube as I'm taking a poop. Oh, wait. It doesn't have Flash support. Guess I wouldn't be able to do that either.
MAG DEVELOPER: 360 Users "More Juvenile" Than PSN Users
Zipper Interactive's Ben Jones has said that his company chose to make MAG a PS3 exclusive because of the lack of maturity on Xbox Live, citing "the things being said" over the service.
"I actually consider Xbox Live the more juvenile of the two...Each service has its own posse. I think the PlayStation audience definitely fits more to our game. As we saw in the beta we've got an audience that's willing to communicate and willing to organize and structure, and help other people to play the game. That's the most remarkable thing that I saw in the beta - random people helping other players along to try and familiarize themselves with this really cool experience." (via GamerZines)
What a stupid thing to say. It's not like the 360 and the PS3 have completely different demographics. If what Ben Jones says is true, and 360 users are "more juvenile" than PS3 users, surely there must be a reason. So let's see if we can't figure this out.
- There are far more people on Xbox Live than there are on the Playstation Network. To use that as a comparison would be like saying that there are more moose attacks in Canada than there are in New York City.
- The Xbox 360 comes with a headset and microphone in the box; the Playstation 3 doesn't. That alone is a huge reason for the difference. If you've got an Xbox 360, you have a tool that instantly allows you to start saying awful things about people's mothers. With the Playstation 3, you've got to go out and buy a $20-50 headset. That would also likely explain why when I hop on Killzone 3 there's nobody talking. That's not a very encouraging sign for a developer that's about to release a massive multiplayer game that relies on communication on the Playstation 3, like Ben is.
This is kind of like when an athlete is doing his first press conference after just signing with a new team. The media asks him "so why did you choose to come here?" The athlete responds with some rhetoric about how he wanted to be part of something special, or something along those lines. We all know that response is BS and would rather he just come out and say "for the money." It's no different in Ben Jones' case. So Ben, why is MAG coming out exclusively to the PS3? Instead of trying to make it look like it was a moral decision on Zipper's part, why not just acknowledge the fact that you're in a partnership with Sony?
Throw a No-No in MLB2K10. PROFIT!
The developer [2K Sports] is offering up Dr. Evil sums of money to the first person on the Xbox 360 or PS3 (sorry, those are the only qualifying consoles) who can pitch a perfect game in the first 60 days of the game's release -- starting March 2, 2010 at 12:01 AM PST and ending on May 2, 2010 at 11:59 PM PDT. Of course, where there's free money, there are caveats.
Two stipulations: You have to play against the CPU in MLB Today mode, where it will automatically default to all of the proper gameplay settings; and you have to record yourself pitching the entire perfect game and slap it onto a DVD. (via Joystiq)
Keep in mind that that's only, like, $675,000 after taxes. Something tells me that this is going to end very badly. Promotions like this always do.
Weekly Rant
"...but it doesn't have multiplayer."
I'm not the type of person that gets upset when I read a review that opposes my opinion. I've always found humor in reading the comments for games and movies on various sites, including this one, and watching people resort to insults because the reviewer didn't share their view. That said, I did read a review this week for Mass Effect 2 that left me very irritated.
The review, done by a well-respected website, praised Bioware's latest project for the most part, except they criticized it for not having an online multiplayer feature. In the end, the reviewer even admits that his final score for the game would have been better had the game incorporated it. I couldn't believe what I was reading. Mass Effect 2 is by no means a perfect game – though it is as close to one as I've ever played – but to criticize it for not including multiplayer is completely preposterous. I didn't leave a nasty comment on that writers review, nor did I send him an angry e-mail, but it still infuriated me enough to talk about it more.
Perhaps I'm old-school, but I play a lot of single player games. I play games for the same reason that I watch movies. I want to be entertained. I want the game developers to tell me a great story. At what point did it become mandatory that all games have multiplayer or else they were inferior to games that did? Developers shouldn't be forced to include multiplayer into their games just so dim-witted reviewers won't mention its absence as a negative talking point.
What I've Been Playing
Mass Effect 2
There's a very good chance that Mass Effect 2 will be mentioned in this part of my column for a very long time. I may even have to rename this portion of the article to 'What I've Been Playing (Besides Mass Effect 2).' I can't help it. As much as I loved the first Mass Effect , Mass Effect 2 is better in every way. It has better graphics, better mechanics, a much improved inventory system, gives you better control of your squad, and BETTER EVERYTHING! It's so awesome to have unrealistically high expectations for something and to still have your mind blown by how good it is.
Bravo, Bioware. You guys have outdone yourselves.
I'm currently playing through the game with my imported paragon Shepard. (That means 'good guy' for you non-Mass Effect players.) I'm not even 8 hours into the game and I'm already excited to play through it again as a renegade. (Or an 'asshole' for you non-Mass Effect players.)
It might be a little early to say this, but Mass Effect 2 is looking like it'll be the best game of 2010.
What do you think the chances are that this article will be approved by my editors? I mean, this is a pretty raunchy article when you consider the list of banned words from Rock Band Network and my review of Jizz Wars. Then again, they do post links to nip slips and what not in the Movies/TV Zone. So I should be in the clear.
Okay, I can't take it anymore. I'm going to have to go ahead and end the column here. If I go too long without playing Mass Effect, I start to get the shakes. It's either that or the three grape-flavored Amp's I've drank today. If you've not had yourself a grape Amp, dude, get on it. That stuff is delicious.
You didn't mention that Liberty City Stories is coming to the PS3. Oh well...
Posted By: David (Guest) on January 29, 2010 at 12:44 AM
Zipper's not in a 'partnership' with Sony, Sony owns them outright.
Posted By: Rod Oracheski (Registered) on January 29, 2010 at 04:36 AM
"It might be a little early to say this, but Mass Effect 2 is looking like it'll be the best game of 2010."
With God of War 3 on the horizon, you may want to reserve judgment until then.
I'll be shocked if it isn't one of the two though.
Posted By: Kratos (Guest) on January 29, 2010 at 05:38 AM
@David
That news broke after I had already submitted my article.
@Rod
Thanks. I couldn't remember if they were owned out right or if they'd had an exclusive agreement.
Posted By: Joshua Richey (Registered) on January 29, 2010 at 08:08 AM
That list of words for rockband did not dissapoint me at all. I'm a 26 year old man and I didnt know what some of those foul words meant. What pray tell is a "foetus". Spaghetti comorant??? What the hell!?!?!?
Posted By: T to The Izzo (Guest) on January 29, 2010 at 09:48 AM
You cant say god? Really... really?
Posted By: Guest#9385 (Guest) on January 29, 2010 at 10:23 AM
Spaghetti Cormorant is a British insult for a Ho... I learned something today that will probably be used in my circle of friends for quite some time. Thanks Rock Band!
Posted By: Tubby (Guest) on January 29, 2010 at 12:00 PM
I couldn't agree more with your statement about the Mass Effect 2 reviewer who lowered the score because of no multiplayer. Perhaps that was the point of the game? Wait, not perhaps, that IS the point of the game. Why does every game have to have multiplayer these days? There is a place for great single player games. In fact, I look for games that are just that. Call me anti-social, but I don't always want to have to play a game with some other nerd online for the best experience.
Fallout was my favorite game of last year and I didn't miss not seeing another player in the wasteland. I probably would have shot him anyway if I did.
Posted By: Wii60 (Guest) on January 29, 2010 at 03:07 PM
"Effect 2 is better in every way. It has better graphics, better mechanics, a much improved inventory system, gives you better control of your squad, and BETTER EVERYTHING!"
Nah. This isn't true.
The inventory is worse. The comnbat is worst. The character system is worse.
It's a great game, and basically equal with ME. However, overall, I'd give ME the edge because ME2 is basically a dumbed down version of ME1.
"With God of War 3 on the horizon, you may want to reserve judgment until then."
l0l
Posted By: Volourn (Guest) on January 29, 2010 at 05:05 PM
@Tubby
That's pretty funny. See if you can't find the meaning of Rosette Sucker. I can't find it used anywhere on the internet.
@Wii60
Couldn't agree more. Hell, Assassin's Creed, Fallout and Mass Effect were all Games of the Year, and none of them had online multiplayer. It's like giving a movie a lower score because it didn't have enough nude scenes.
@Volourn
That's interesting. You're the only one I've seen that has said that. I think that 'dumbing down' the inventory system and whatnot is what improves the game. Nearly everyone was in agreement that the inventory system was a mess. I also think that the combat is much improved. It feels more fluid.
@Kratos
Yeah, it's a little early to call ME2 the Game of the Year, but I don't know, it's pretty damn excellent. It definitely holds it own against the best games from 2009.
Looking at the rest of the years scheduled releases, the only game that looks like it could contend for GOTY, at this point, is The Last Guardian.
Posted By: Joshua Richey (Registered) on January 29, 2010 at 05:33 PM
"Nearly everyone was in agreement that the inventory system was a mess."
I agree that ME1's inventory system was far from great (in fact, it was subpar and quitem possibly its weakest link). Howeever, it should ahve been fixed not removed. BIO has had some solid inventory systems so they easily could have borrowed this.
And, if they wanted to limit/take out inventory, they themselvs have an example of way to do it. JE's handle it much better.
Posted By: Volourn (Guest) on January 30, 2010 at 10:03 AM
Good call on the multiplayer argument. Some games are solo experiences and far better for it. I dont want mass effect team deathmatch frankly.
Oh and Volurn, please tell me how in the blue hell the combat is worse in mass effect 2. You lost any respect for your argument once you said that sadly.
Posted By: JBL (Guest) on January 31, 2010 at 05:40 PM
P.S. I honestly cant see how GOW3 can beat out ME 2. Tho I wont say it to your face Kratos.
Just seems somewhat small in comparison but maybe ill be wrong come March.
Posted By: JBL (Guest) on January 31, 2010 at 05:43 PM
I enjoyed mass effect 2 but getting rid of the inventory system sucked. I want to at least have a bit of the RPG elements such as picking armor and weapons. It's pretty boring when all you have is the same guns until you find a new one.
It's also way too easy thanks to regenerating health.
Posted By: Guest#4959 (Guest) on February 01, 2010 at 12:04 AM
"Oh and Volurn, please tell me how in the blue hell the combat is worse in mass effect 2. You lost any respect for your argument once you said that sadly."
If you lost all respect for my argument why the heck did you ask me to fill in more details? Absolutely ridiclous flame. What's hilarious is we're talking about a BIO game - a company I've previously been attacked for being a 'fanboy' off. L0L
Anyways, I'll bite your troll bait with this little tidbit of info that just scrapes a little buit of what's wrong with ME2's combat 9which, btw, I don't think is the worst ever but it is worse than ME1).
It says a lot that the best strategy when dealing with combat is to stay hidden and allow your allies do most of the work as youn take pot shots once and awhile. When your companions cna last an entuire minute in the open while you last maybe 5 seconds before you lose shields and have to hide again, there is something fundamentally wrong with the combat system.
Posted By: Volourn (Guest) on February 01, 2010 at 02:27 AM
I think that Creators.Rockband.com forgot "Cleveland Steamer" ;).
Posted By: WadeMcG (Guest) on February 02, 2010 at 01:29 AM
Copyright � 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.