The Game Plan 03.07.08: The Greatest Video Game Villains...Ever (Part 3)
Posted by James McGee on 03.07.2008
This week, I travel to the land of the Rising Sun and spotlight a villain from the most famous Japan's most famous RPG series....Oh, and it isn't Sephiroth.
Some men just want to watch the world burn—Alfred Pennyworth (Michael Caine), The Dark Knight
In the very first column of this current series (in which I'm examining some of the greatest video game villains of all time), I mentioned an affinity for bad guys who are evil simply for the sake of being evil. When I made that statement, the character I really had in mind was The Joker. The most famous member of Batman's Rogues Gallery is one of my favorite characters, because he is just so unashamedly evil, and such a perfect complement to ol' Bats. But when I really started thinking about the nature of the character, I realized that it isn't pure sadism at the heart of The Joker's actions, and his relationship with The Bat isn't one of pure good vs. pure evil. Specifically, the excellent quote at the top of this article reminded me that there is a method to his madness that is even more frightening than evil for the sake of evil. Whereas Batman took his personal misery and channeled it into a positive goal, The Joker allowed his misery to consume him, essentially losing faith in everything. On the surface, it's "misery loves company," but it's actually much more disturbing than that. The excellent Superman story arch "Emperor Joker" offers a glimpse into this madman's inner thoughts. In his own twisted way, he believes that he is helping a doomed world limp towards its inevitable, meaningless end. His world view is nihilism in its purest form.
Armed with this understanding of the character, the inner-workings of my geeky mind immediately made a connection between the Joker and a villain from the world of video games. I remembered another clown whose cowardice and lunacy masked a much more sinister agenda. His superiors wanted to harness the power of gods to rule the world, but this madman wanted ultimate power so that he might destroy himself and everything in existence. Where others saw hope, he saw only despair. He is Kefka, I am James McGee, and here's The Game Plan.
Okay, so it's hard for anyone to look intimidating when he's rendered in all the glory of a 16-bit RPG, but trust me: Kefka's bad news.
Part of what makes Kefka so deadly frightening is how easy it is to underestimate him at first. He may be the most flamboyant villain in the game, but he is not technically the primary antagonist at the beginning of Final Fantasy VI. Much like Darth Vader appears to be Governor Tarkin's lap-dog in the original Star Wars, Kefka is merely Emperor Gestahl's court mage. Actually, he more closely resembles a court jester at first. He tosses off cutesy lines like "This is sickening! You sound like chapters in a self-help book" and "Son-of-a-submariner." Players face him in battle early and often (which, by the Laws of Video Games, means he can't possibly be that big of a threat, right?), and he usually runs away sniveling. It is easy to write the guy off as a minor threat—it's a mistake Gestahl himself makes, right before Kefka betrays him. Kefka distinguishes himself as a memorable character right off the bat, but it isn't until later in the game that players really uncover his true nature, and discover what a huge, devastating role he plays in the story.
Some people may argue that bad is bad, period. But I tend to think there are different degrees of evil. It's one thing to kill a person for money, and another to kill for no reason. It's one thing to kill a person quickly, and another to torture the victim first. While Gestahl and his Empire represent a familiar, almost comforting enemy—that of oppressive authority—Kefka demonstrates a much more sadistic streak. The evil scheme at the heart of FFVI's story is the Empire imprisoning and siphoning magical power from creatures called Espers. Kefka is not content to draw away their power. He prefers to taunt and torture them in the process. Rather than use the countless, willing members of the Empire's army to attack the town of Narshe, Kefka places a "Slave Crown" on Terra, forcing her to do it against her will. Kefka's methods seem to value the dramatic over the necessary.
Okay, that's better. A little creepy, a little ridiculous, and very dangerous.
Maybe the best in-game example of Kefka's twisted tactics is the siege of Doma. Was the Empire "evil" to attack a weaker kingdom? Maybe, but to play devil's advocate, that's what Empires do: they expand, conquer, put down resistance. Doma was outnumbered and outgunned—it would have fallen to Imperial forces eventually. But the slow, inevitable crumbling of their defenses wasn't quick enough for Kefka, and it certainly didn't have the proper flair. Taking matters into his own hands, he poisoned Doma's water supply, not only killing soldiers—men who had trained for the kingdom's defense and accepted the inherent dangers—but hundreds of women, children, and other civilians. Regardless of the task at hand, Kefka's priority is causing the greatest amount of pain.
But what is behind Kefka's sour mood? I mentioned earlier the dichotomy between Batman and The Joker, each dealing with hardship in different ways. Apparently, early experiments infusing humans with magic left Kefka's psyche a little fragile. It isn't clear if there were other events in his life that augmented his madness, but regardless, he's definitely a "glass half empty" kind of guy by the time players encounter him. Many heroes in Final Fantasy VI have faced loss, heartbreak, and adversity—Locke and Cyan have lost loved ones, Terra is something of a wayward soul without a purpose, Gau is orphaned, etc. However, each one found reasons to press on, overcome their particular hardships, and most importantly, not let their own misfortunes color their perception of the world. Kefka…well, his outlook is a little different.
"Life...Dreams...Hope...Where'd they come from? And where are they headed...? These things...I'm going to destroy!!...I will create a monument to non-existence! "
Ooookay, then. Kefka obviously has some issues to work through, but instead he chooses to bring everyone and everything down with him. His goal isn't to rule the world, but utterly destroy it. Hey, I'm all for free speech, so if somebody wants to share their world view with other people, that's their business. But forcing their beliefs on others—especially when those beliefs involve the death of themselves and everyone else—just isn't cool.
This column has nothing to do with Sephiroth. But since you guys love him SO MUCH, I thought I'd include a pic anyway. Anything for my readers!
This is not always a nice world we live in. There is pain, and suffering, and misery. Sometimes, it seems like there's nothing we can do to help the situation. But we can at least choose not to contribute to the problem. Other people feed on chaos and suffering. Kefka, The Joker, and people like them want to cause as much damage as possible before their life—which they see as utterly meaningless—is over. It's true: some people just want to watch the world burn. Or, as Kefka would say "Welcome to my barbecue!"
Special Note: Though I often amaze even myself with the ability to recall the most obscure, geeky tidbits, even I can't remember exact dialogue from a mid-90s RPG. Thanks to www.rpgclassics.com for refreshing my memory.
Kaefka was more of a joke. He was not a very serious threat, and he was easy to knock down to size. A major villian for me would be Solidus Snake.
You mention the Joker, but Kaefka doesn't bring that same kind of contrast. Terra, and company don't represent order and justice. Kaeka's antics can't play off of Terra and company's personalities.
He is nothing more than a main villian that is a trickster. That is all. He seems kind of out of place.
Heck, Solidus had his moment at the end. Contrary to his misguided attempts, he was trying to be a hero to his country. When he was at the feet of a George Washington statue. That was very powerful. It illustrated that he was trying to be a true hero, but he was turned astray.
However, that is your opinion.
Posted By: David R. (Guest) on March 07, 2008 at 01:07 AM
man, i wish i could back and beat final fantasy 3 all over again. kefka's definately the baddest fuckin villain ive ever faced off against. thank god i had umaro to help me out.
Posted By: mike__ (Guest) on March 07, 2008 at 02:06 AM
"Kaefka was more of a joke. He was not a very serious threat, and he was easy
to knock down to size. A major villian for me would be Solidus Snake."
I'm taking the safe assumption that you haven't actually PLAYED the game in its entirety, and are just using the article's--and what a well-written article it is--basic points as an excuse to shill for Metal Gear. Which is fine. But let's not pretend that we're making sense when we determine that a villian who BECAME A GOD AND BROUGHT ON ARMAGEDDON and who faced down something like twelve heroes at once in the final battle is to be easily outgunned by Kojima's pseudo-patriotic hamfistery.
Because that's just ridiculous.
Posted By: Changa Chang (Guest) on March 07, 2008 at 03:32 AM
"I'm taking the safe assumption that you haven't actually PLAYED the game in its
entirety, and are just using the article's"
Ummm...I enjoyed it as Final Fantasy III on the SNES, I have it for the PSOne, I have the GBA remake...yet I never beat the game.
I'm sorry. I RAPED Kaefka with Quick and Ultima. I think I killed him in three or four turns.
Yet I never played the game. I must be making it up...pfft.
Posted By: David R. (Guest) on March 07, 2008 at 04:41 AM
metal gear games = overrated
Posted By: effs (Guest) on March 07, 2008 at 02:34 PM
LOL. I'm guessing you just googled "Easiest Way to Beat Kefka" and ran with it, yeah?
You missed this one, though. From GameFAQs discussion board on FFVIA:
"OMFG! I beat Kefka so easily! Was the last fight supposed to be that pathetic?
Depends. I blazed through him like greased lightning at level 40. However, I used Flare, completely ignored Ultima, and had the best equipment setups available. But you don't get bragging rights if you were overleveled, and especially if your victory sounds something like "...I used Ultima and Quick..."."
Fail. And agreement that MGS couldn't be more overrated.
Posted By: Changa Chang (Guest) on March 07, 2008 at 04:26 PM
Google that? Uhh huh. That is your argument. You can't prove it. Did I google how to beat Mystic Quest back in 1989? Yeah. You figured me out.
Heck, when I was in 8th grade, I didn't borrow FF3 from my friend. It doesn't matter anyway, get back to me when you hit puberty.
FAIL? How can my opinion be a FAIL, Joseph Stalin? You won't purge me in a show trial. God, FF fanboys are worse than M$ fanboys. Get back to me when you played Crystilis.
Posted By: David R (Guest) on March 07, 2008 at 07:05 PM
I'm.
I'm sorry. He was more of a trickster?
I know you have your opinion. And such.
But he.
And if you havent played the game.
Dont read any farther.
But he destroyed the world! Well. Pretty much.
He's one of the only villians to do it! He Succeeded! And he became a god. Well. Using God powers. Whatever. But yeah. To say he is a trickster. That's just taking how he looks. Well. Actually that makes sense. He looks like one crazy mother. And a jester.
And how he acted in the first while of the game. He fucking killed like. hundereds of people. Without a care at all.
He tortured. He murders Leo. Controls Terra. Destorys the world.
Seriously?
Posted By: Mike (Guest) on March 07, 2008 at 07:12 PM
So, was Arkham overrated as well? What about Indalecio? What about Walter from Silent Hill 4 The Room?
Posted By: David R (Guest) on March 07, 2008 at 07:12 PM
Destroying the World makes an excellent villain? I guess the 10 Wiseman are a billion times better. they DESTROYED A PLANET (Expel).
Posted By: David R (Guest) on March 07, 2008 at 07:27 PM
Technically, he changes the world. He doesn't destroy it. There is a big difference between destruction and changing. The game always takes place on the planet; therefore, how can you interact with nothingness?
Posted By: David R (Guest) on March 07, 2008 at 07:31 PM
Bro, I love the fact that you included Kefka and agree with your opinions. Kefka is one of the most evil villains in video game history. If a game can make you CRAVE a fight with a bad guy, you know you're doing something right.
My only complaint was the picture of Sephiroth. What an over-rated villain.
Posted By: 411Derek (Guest) on March 08, 2008 at 05:26 PM
So many arguements going on, I didn't know this was GameFAQ's?
If you think Kefka is a great villian, cool. If you think MGS is better than FF, cool. If you think Pepsi's better than Coke, cool.
You think MGS series is over-rated? Alright then. I disagree but if that's what you think then that's cool.
Whose right? No one. Whose wrong? No one. Just play and have fun.
And for the record, Dr. Pepper kicks Pepsi and Coke's asses. =)
Posted By: Vitamin D (Registered) on March 08, 2008 at 06:24 PM
Why does people keep mentioning MGS? I only mentioned it because it was the first game that came to mind. Oh well...
Vitamin D,
Great post.
I just don't see Kaefka being the videogame equivalent of Iago (Othello). I think his character was one dimensional. That is what I think, you can disagree.
I think FFVII dug deeper into Sephiroth's thought process. He was a better developed character, in my opinion. But he isn't my favorite by far. (There is Virgil, Arkham, Loki, Zeus, etc).
Posted By: David R (Guest) on March 08, 2008 at 08:09 PM
WARIO....nuff said....lol.
Posted By: guest (Guest) on March 08, 2008 at 10:23 PM
I loved Kefka and his maniacal laugh. Then you have the lackey of the empire so to speak turn on them and prove just how evil he really is, that along with poisoning the water of an entire town killing women and children, he is EVIL and CRAZY what better combination. I still feel FF3 was the best FF of the series as far as story goes.
Posted By: salans (Guest) on March 09, 2008 at 01:49 AM