www.411mania.com
|  News |  Film Reviews |  Columns |  DVD/Other Reviews |  News Report |
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// Irina Shayk's Super Sexy FHM Pics
MUSIC
// [VIDEO] CM Punk Talks Chris Brown On NYC Interview
WRESTLING
// Latest on The Rock's Heat Backstage in WWE
POLITICS
// Latest Poll Numbers: Romney Beating Santorum, Obama Dominating In Michigan
MMA
// [VIDEO] Dana White Calls Floyd Mayweather Racist
GAMES
// Are You Buying a PlayStation Vita?


MOVIE REVIEW  MOVIE REVIEWS
//  Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance Review
//  Safe House Review
//  The Secret World of Arrietty Review
//  The Grey Review
//  Underworld: Awakening Review
//  Haywire Review
 HOT MOVIES
//  The Dark Knight Rises
//  Captain America
//  The Avengers
//  Iron Man 3
//  The Hobbit
//  Spider-Man Reboot
SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds





Follow 411mania on Twitter!




Add 411 On Facebook
 



 
 411mania » Movies » Columns



Advertisement
Alternate Takes 01.28.12: The Incredible Hulk
Posted by Shawn S. Lealos on 01.28.2012





Welcome to Week 189 of Alternate Takes, my name is Shawn S. Lealos and you have entered my world.

Make sure to click the Twitter "Like" link over there to the right side of the article! Support 411mania, your home for the best in pop culture entertainment news. Also, if you are on StumbleUpon, click on over and Subscribe to my stumbles. I'll return the favor.









I didn't really see anything wrong with the Ang Lee Hulk movie. It is a cerebral film about Bruce Banner and his inner demon. Lee went on to win an Oscar later for Brokeback Mountain, and while he is more of an art house director and an acquired taste, he made a true comic book movie, using actual panels to tell the story. But it was about Banner first and foremost and not The Hulk. The movie is about a man anguished with the inner turmoil of a second personality he cannot control. It is a great story, but it was not what people wanted to see.

People wanted to see Hulk smash things.

How does Marvel fix this perceived failure? First, they hire the guy who directed The Transporter to take over as the director for this version. Then they recast every character in the movie, so there is no trace left of the previous effort to convince audiences it is nothing like Lee's movie. Finally, they pump up the fighting action and lessen the story of the man behind the monster. It's a simple plan - ignore the story and have a lot of scenes of a monster destroying tanks. They created something so different that the audiences who hated the last movie have something they can enjoy - brainless popcorn fare and nonstop action.

The results of this endeavor are as far removed from the last movie as you would expect. And the movie kicks all kinds of butt.

I am a fan of the Ang Lee movie, as I feel it is a rare intelligent comic film that expects the viewers to use their brains instead of turning them off like most summer flicks. This movie takes the more travelled road and presents an experience where we can sit back with a big dumb smile on our face, check our brains at the door, and watch the carnage as it unfolds on the screen. It is a good companion piece to the Lee film, because between the two, you get both Banner's story and the action expected from a movie starring the Hulk.

The opening credits give a quick rundown of how Banner became the Hulk and then explains that Gen. Ross wants Banner back to dissect him to figure out what makes The Hulk work. He wants to use this knowledge to create a new super weapon. This is also where the director starts to pepper in Easter Eggs and homage. The chair, the target on Banner's forehead and his eyes as he changes are all directly lifted from the Bill Bixby television series.



Replacing Eric Bana is Edward Norton and that is a nice step improvement. Although Bana is a fine actor in his own right, Norton is just on another level from the mere mortals that surround him in Hollywood. Gen. Ross is recast as William Hurt, although I would take him or Sam Elliott in the role. It's a no-lose situation when choosing between these men.

The only real downgrade in acting talent comes in the casting of Liv Tyler as Betty Ross. While The Dark Knight received kudos for replacing the amateurish acting of Katie Holmes with the star talent of Maggie Gyllenhaal, The Incredible Hulk goes in the other direction by replacing the wonderful Jennifer Connelly with Tyler. However, Tyler is the only downgrade in talent. The always fantastic Tim Roth rounds out the main cast as Emil Blonsky, a soldier under Ross' command chosen to face the Hulk.

The action this time around is ridiculous. The film opens with Banner in Chile, where he is communicating online with another scientist trying to help him find a cure for his gamma poisoning. He has gone months without an incident and has undergone training to control his anger. However, he will not be allowed to live in peace as Ross eventually finds him and sends in a team to capture and arrest Banner. Banner becomes the Hulk and the movie kicks into high gear.

Highlights include an all out battle between Hulk and Ross' military forces, where they bring out all the firepower you could ever imagine and still can't stop the behemoth. The crazy battles and fight scenes that viewers of the previous movie wanted are delivered in this movie as the Hulk would go face to face with Blonsky's Abomination. The fight was very similar to the one between Iron Man and The Iron Monger in the first Iron Man film, as The Abomination was much larger and stronger than The Hulk. However, this fight trumps the Iron Man final battle and it is a great end to a fun, rollercoaster ride of a movie.



The CGI was a step up from the Ang Lee film. The Hulk seemed more realistically rendered this time around, and less like the video game character that the last movie presented. The Abomination was also well done, almost a phlegm-colored prehistoric creature. The battle scenes were shot in the haphazard, dizzying style that seems to be the fashion these days, although I find the quick camera movements make it hard to follow the action. The fight between The Hulk and The Abomination in the streets of New York City was incredible. I have to give kudos to the animation team, who stepped up and delivered in a big way this time around.

For geeks, there were so many cool things to pick up on. Mentions of S.H.I.E.L.D., Nick Fury and Doc Sampson are peppered through the film. Variations of music from the classic television show even plays at various points. There is the normal Stan Lee cameo, as well as a character named Stanley. Lou Ferrigno has the same cameo as the Ang Lee film, as a security guard, but in a really nice touch he also voices The Hulk. Yeah, you read that right, The Hulk speaks and it is his best known catch phrase. Finally, there is the cameo at the end of the movie, similar to the one that came after the credits of Iron Man.

Edward Norton ended up unhappy with the final cut of the movie, voiced his displeasure and Marvel replaced him in the Avengers team-up movie. I assume the reason is because the movie ended up being about a big green monster and not the man behind the mask. Banner gets little character development, a very small amount of dialogue, and is there only as a backdrop to the main story. This is a less cerebral film than the Ang Lee version, but that is what they were aiming for. It's not as good as Iron Man, but for a summer blockbuster about a giant green monster, it is about as good as you could ever expect. With this movie, Marvel went two-for-two in the start of their new big screen franchise.

This, of course, set up for The Avengers. This film introduced the Super Soldier Serum, which is what created Captain America during World War II. With Captain America coming in 2011, Marvel continued to tie its movies together making it a great time to be a comic book fan.



Cheers: The action in this movie was amazing. The Incredible Hulk delivered the action and mayhem that fans of the character wanted from the Ang Lee movie. The final fight was also a million times better than the strange mess that ended Lee's film. For anyone would wanted to see Hulk Smash, this movie paid off in spades.

Jeers: The plot was as brainless as you might expect from a movie by Louis Leterrier. The Banner stuff was minimal and this was more about destruction and mayhem than anything resembling a smart plot. Out of all the Marvel movies leading into the Avengers movie, this one had the worst story.

Reviews: "Ang Lee's thoughtful, Freudian Hulk in 2003 was nowhere near as bad as its rep. And Louis Letterier's proudly pea-brained The Incredible Hulk is nowhere near incredible. In fact, in its rush to deliver a constant rush of action it forgets to think at all. But the latest spin on the Marvel comic-book hero delivers the popcorn goods." – Peter Travers, Rolling Stone Magazine (2.5-out-of-4)

Pivotal Scene: It is hard to pick out a pivotal scene in this movie since it was all about the action. I'd say the scene at the end, with Banner, Betty and Ross on the plane and the realization that they needed to trust in The Hulk to stop The Abomination was the part of the story that changed all the characters.

Comic Book Grade: B+ - The movie does a really good job of delivering the comic book to the big screen. The big complaint about the first movie is that it was too cerebral, which is not what people want to see from a comic book movie about The Hulk. They want to see The Hulk smash things and this movie delivers that in spades.

Best Lines:

Bruce Banner to a Latino thug – "Don't make me hungry. You wouldn't like me when I'm hungry."

Betty Ross: – The subway is probably quickest.
Bruce Banner: – Me in a metal tube, deep underground with hundreds of people in the most aggressive city in the world?
Betty Ross: – Right. Let's get a cab.

Emil Blonsky – I've had missions go wrong, and seen good people go down, all because someone didn't tell them what they were walking into. I moved on because that's the job, and that's what we do. But this... this is a whole new level of weird, and I don't think I want to step away from it. Sir, if you're going to take another crack at him, I want in. And with respect, sir, you'll need a team that's prepared and ready to fight, because if that thing shows up again... you're going to have a lot of professional tough guys pissing in their pants, sir.

Betty Ross – What is it like? When it happens, what do you experience?
Bruce Banner – Remember those experiments we volunteered for at Harvard? Those induced hallucination? It's a lot like that, just a thousand times amplified. It's like someone poured a litre of acid into my brain.

Hey, isn't that…: When Banner showed up at Betty's research center to try to retrieve his medical information, there was a computer tech in the room that he bribed with pizza. That computer tech was played by Martin Starr, who also played geek styled characters in Adventureland, Superbad and Knocked Up.

Casting Call: Edward Norton came in to replace Eric Bana as part of the entire process of trying to make everyone forget about Ang Lee's effort. Most of the changes were great, although I felt like Liz Tyler was a step down from Jennifer Connelly. However, Norton won't be back for The Avengers due to a disagreement with the volatile actor. Instead, Mark Ruffalo will take over the role in the Marvel blockbuster this summer.

Easter Eggs: There are a ton of Easter Eggs in The Incredible Hulk. I'll start off with the classic TV show. At the beginning of the movie, when Banner is working on his yoga, he is watching television and the show that is on is The Courtship of Eddie's Father, starring Bill Bixby, the man who played Banner in the TV show. Lou Ferrigno, who played the Hulk in that show, is a security guard here and also voices the Hulk when the monster speaks. Finally, the student who videos the Hulk fighting the military on his cell phone is named Jack McGee, the same as the reporter who used to hound the Hulk on the TV show. The movie also uses the theme song from the TV show on numerous occasions.

Moving on to the comic, Samuel Sterns is the name of the researcher who helps Banner. In the comics, Stern becomes the evil genius, The Leader, and you see the start of the transformation here when the gamma blood seeps into his skull. Leonard Sampson, the love interest of Betty, is a psychiatrist and shares the exact same name as Doc Sampson, a psychiatrist who ends up with gamma in his blood (and green hair) as well.

And of course, at the end Tony Stark approaches General Ross with an offer. For those who are not sure what happened when Stark and Ross met up, here is the follow up short film, The Consultant.










Great movie by all means, I think the final battle was somehow dissapointing also, but overall it does a good job introducing a complex character. About the supervillain when the movie was anounced I was afraid they would choose a classic villain like the mandarin because the average audience would find it hard to digest somehow. In my opinion it is perhaps the best superhero movie to date. - Posted By: n00b (Guest)

I agree. By making the villain more personal, it made the story flow better. It is similar to Batman Begins where they made the bad guy the person who trained Bruce Wayne. If they had jumped straight to Bane, I doubt it would have resonated as well with the fans. I also liked Justin Hammer in the second movie more than Whiplash, even though they did screw up his age. But I'll discuss that next week.


I think the thing that pissed me off about the final battle was comparing it to how Stane died in the comics. In the comics he is bitter, beaten, revealed. Iron Man is about to take him in, and he's sitting on the ground with his helmet (beaten) off. He lifts his own hand to his head and kills himself. I think there was so much room for an emotional moment, with a ultra-confident CEO being revealed as a villain. - Posted By: Guest#1247 (Guest)

I agree. This was nothing more than a superhero and super villain beating each other up until one died. I mentioned how the problem came because it was not the main story and there was not time to do it right. I think if Stane had lived but ended up exposed and humiliated, it might have been a better finish. Tim Burton messed everything up when he killed The Joker at the end of his first movie. I hate the bad guy dying at the end.


Downey owned all. Almost a perfect comic movie. - Posted By: Guest#3670 (Guest)

Easily the best Marvel movie made so far. - Posted By: Ryan Haseldine (Guest)

Pretty decent review...but when thinking about this movie, I think it is important to also give it credit for something that you glossed over. Before this movie Robert Downey Jr had faded away, it was this movie that gave his career a kickstart, and led to him becoming "one of the most popular actors working today," not the other way around. Goes to show what a great job they did, and I'm happy that thus far Downey has managed to keep away from falling back to the old habits that knocked his career out, especially in light of the fact that Charlie Sheen can't seem to do the same. - Posted By: Devin (Guest)


I completely agree that this was Downey's movie and he killed in it. As for Devin, I guess for me I saw Downey's comeback as Kiss Kiss Bang Bang, but that is not a famous movie, so for most people there was Zodiac and Charlie Bartlett, where he was a supporting character, and then Iron Man as the big comeback as a star.


Whoa, the average non comic reader didn't know who Captain America is? Sorry but I find that kinda hard to believe. - Posted By: Guest#0328 (Guest)

Myself, nor most of my friends had really heard much about Captain America, he is a superhero that you may have heard of, but dont know anything about his character. Hell, when I first heard about Iron Man, I thought it was the same character as the Iron Giant. Lol. - Posted By: Sparky (Guest)


I let Sparky answer the question for me but here is something else. For those unfamiliar with comics (like girls), a lot of people I know had no idea who Captain America was. My wife knew about Iron Man thanks to his ‘90s cartoon but had no clue anything about Captain America. In order to be knowledgeable in the mainstream, a geek property has to have some kind of crossover appeal. It has to be a cartoon, a movie or some other sort of the mainstream pop culture lexicon.

In the ‘90s, Captain America cameos in the 1994 Spider-Man and X-Men cartoons, he appeared in the a movie in 1990 that pretty much no one has seen and two Ultimate Avengers animated movies. Other than that, you have a reference in the 1969 film Easy Rider. What has there been to tell mainstream America, who does not read comics, who Captain America is?







Upcoming Releases

February 17, 2012 - Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance



February 28, 2012 - Justice League: Doom



April 13, 2012 - Bullet to the Head - Bullet to the Head is an upcoming 2012 action film, directed by Walter Hill based upon Alexis Nolent's French graphic novel Du Plomb Dans La Tete. The film will star Sylvester Stallone, Sung Kang. Christian Slater, Alfred Gough, Miles Millar, and Kevin King Templeton are producing the film.

May 4, 2012 - The Avengers



May 25, 2012 - Men in Black III

July 03, 2012 - The Amazing Spider-Man



July 20, 2012 - The Dark Knight Rises



September 21, 2012 - Dredd - Dredd is directed by Pete Travis with a script by Alex Garland. The cast currently consists of Karl Urban as Judge Dredd and Olivia Thirlby as Judge Anderson. Dredd is due to be released on September 21, 2012 in 3-D.

May 3, 2013 - Iron Man 3

June 14, 2013 - Superman: Man of Steel

June 28, 2013 - R.I.P.D. - R.I.P.D. is an upcoming action-comedy crime film set to be directed by Robert Schwentke, based on the comic book Rest In Peace Department by Peter M. Lenkov. The film will star Ryan Reynolds and Jeff Bridges as Nick Walker and Bo, respectively.

July 26, 2013 - Thor 2

May 2, 2014 - The Amazing Spider-Man 2

AND NOW A WORD FROM OUR SPONSORS

FOLLOW ALL MY WRITING ON FACEBOOK
Follow Me on Twitter
Help me out by Stumbling My Writing

http://www.twitter.com/411mania
http://www.twitter.com/411wrestling
http://www.twitter.com/411moviestv
http://www.twitter.com/411music
http://www.twitter.com/411games
http://www.twitter.com/411mma


Post Comment (12)  |  Email Shawn S. Lealos  |  View Shawn S. Lealos's 411 Profile

  Send To Friend  |    Stumble It!  |    Digg It!  | 



Please add your comment below.
If you are registered, you can login and post under your registered name. If not, you can post as a guest or register.

* Please note that 411 moderates all comments. Your comment will show up on the site after it has been approved by an editor.
 
Name : 
Comment : 
Remaining Characters : 
2800
 

Comments (12)

 
I disagree with everything you had to say about the Ang Lee film. That movie was just trash from beginning to end. There wasn't anything cerebral about it, it was just crap. Also, actually putting comic book panels in a movie do not make it good. It just made it even cheesier than it already was.

Posted By: Guest#1768 (Guest)  on January 28, 2012 at 01:24 AM

 
 
...don't do the 'best lines' bull-sh*t, be a writer and write about it, some other clown has tried it with his movie reviews and it comes off as beyond stupid...

Posted By: Stupid Is... (Guest)  on January 28, 2012 at 01:25 AM

 
 
I don't normally enjoy comic book movies but this was pretty good. Edward Norton is a phenomenal actor and it's unfortunate that Mark Ruffalo is replacing him in The Avengers. Perhaps the other less talented actors were scared of Norton's ego and the fact that he outacted Richard Gere in his first movie, should have won an Oscar for American History X and more than held his own against De Niro and Brando.

Posted By: Cosmo KKKramer (Guest)  on January 28, 2012 at 07:33 AM

 
 
The Incredible Hulk began in Brazil not Chile. That was the only connection to the Ang Lee movie. The Lee movie ended in Brazil

Posted By: Harry (Guest)  on January 28, 2012 at 08:47 AM

 
 
The beginning of The Hulk takes place in Brazil not Chile.

Posted By: Guest#0860 (Guest)  on January 28, 2012 at 09:02 AM

 
 
I was also a fan of Ang Lee's HULK. It wasn't nearly as bad as everybody said it was, although I would have liked to see more references to the original comics.

As for The Incredible Hulk, I've read that Edward Norton was heavily involved in the creative process and deeply offended that they cut most of his contributed material out of the final cut of the movie. Although I would have like to see his vision, I still can't help but think that this was a good decision in the long run. I remember Norton saying that The Incredible Hulk is, at its core, a fugitive story. And I don't think that's true at all. Norton was probably thinking more of the old TV series than the comics. If given his way, the movie would have become a big-budget adaptation of the TV series. Now that may not have been a bad thing, necessarily, but it was definitely not what Marvel needed to tie the film in with the others and lead into The Avengers.

In the end, The Incredible Hulk came across as a mish-mash of ideas. It's somehow apparent that a lot of material was cut out. Still, it manages to be incredibly entertaining. I actually clapped when Hulk said his most famous catch phrase.


Posted By: NoLifeKing66 (Guest)  on January 28, 2012 at 09:18 AM

 
 
Love me some Hulk.

Posted By: Jamal (Guest)  on January 28, 2012 at 11:19 AM

 
 
Ha ha, yeah. Mutant poodles and 60 foot Hulks are very cerebral.

Posted By: Guest#8190 (Guest)  on January 28, 2012 at 01:28 PM

 
 
This film was on network TV over here in the sunny UK (with obvious cuts, it was shown at 15.00).
I have a question though. In the opening sequence (you have to pause the movie and read the mock file which is shown after the Stark weapon reference) it indicates that Banner has the following known contacts:
Betty Ross
Rick Jones
Doc Samson
If however Samson is Ross' love interest in this movie, how can this be????

By the way, even with the cuts, this film kicks a##!!

I also guess from the ending we will see the more cerebal Hulk as introduced by Peter David in the 90s??

I read this column evey saturday, keep up the good work.


Posted By: Don Keyking (Guest)  on January 28, 2012 at 01:56 PM

 
 
I like the Ang Lee "version" more than the Norton movie, but I understand why people do not like it, just watching the hulk jump around is not the coolest way to show the guy but in my opinion the movie was great.
btw I do see them as a series not as marvel triyng to forget the first one, but thats just me. The second one starts when the first one lefted, they are still seeking banner and one presents the inner struggle and the second one delivers the all out action. I recommend watching them both one right next after the other.
About Captain America not being known my guess is that after Pyuns movie marvel did tried to "phase him out", by not giving him a cartoon and that sort of stuff, considering she-hulk appeared way more than him in the 90s.


Posted By: n00b (Guest)  on January 28, 2012 at 02:14 PM

 
 
Interestingly enough of all the Avengers lead up movies, this one is the hardest to find on BlueRay in a store, most are the Ang Lee version.

Posted By: DeimosMasque (Guest)  on January 28, 2012 at 04:42 PM

 
 
I think the Ang Lee Hulk is great... until the Hulk Dogs show up. Then it turns to shit.

Posted By: G-Walla (Guest)  on January 28, 2012 at 05:15 PM

 


www.41mania.com
Copyright οΏ½ 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.