The Big Screen Bulletin 07.16.07: News with the Most Rewarding Chamber of Secrets
Posted by Chad Webb on 07.16.2007
A look at the feedback from "Sicko", the box office results, more wizard fantasy adaptations on the way, Spielberg's future projects, the new "Ace Ventura", the 20 Second Sermon, new DVD releases, trailer ratings, and much more!
For Argument's Sake: Sicko
I've decided to address viewers' feedback in the news report this week instead of a straight to video nightmare. I have never done this before, and I really have no reason why I haven't, but after all the emails regarding my review of Sicko, I just had make some sort of comment. I had been thinking about doing the "For Argument's Sake" section for awhile now. I plan on incorporating it into the Big Screen Bulletin at some point. My outline is to touch on various arguments I have encountered regarding movies. It could be anything, and in the future, you will see what I mean. I'm not going to make it solely about feedback because that fluctuates from week to week, and I don't want to become redundant.
Moving along. I proud to say most of the feedback was positive, yet most had thoughts and opinions added to the compliments. I knew I wasn't going to please everyone with my review. I tried, but that's impossible to do with such a controversial figure in Michael Moore. It is difficult to write a review on one of his films, and attempt to be totally neutral. I have nothing against critics who voice their personal opinions with intensity, but in doing that, the readers opinion of you can change dramatically. The stressful world we live in today has caused numerous documentaries and political thrillers to focus on the problems we deal with. Thus, critics are forced to put their cards on the table.
Ok, the following emails were chosen because I felt they made good cases.
The Argument: great review.... but I do not understand why people keep calling Michael Moore's files "documentaries".. his films are strong, but as you state in your review he "manipulates" and has a biased agenda which falls outside of the definition of a documentary:
- .Movies, Television. based on or re-creating an actual event, era, life story, etc., that purports to be factually accurate and contains no fictional elements.
I think Moore's movies would be more powerful if he stuck to the facts and did not distort events to his own contrived, manipulated conclusions, but nonetheless, he challenges the audience to think and entertains.. but films like Farenheit and Columbine are as much documentaries as Oliver Stone's movie on the Kennedy assassination. .. I like Michael Moore's movies but they are not documentaries... they are strong and would be more powerful if they were more factual and truthful.
--From Robert
The Reply: He makes a point I have heard over and over again. A quick response is I guess we have to call them something don't we? Moore does have factual elements, but he also twists them around to fit what he wants to express. Maybe he does this to show a specific message to us, but it seems to come off as manipulation. He gets our attention, which makes him a good filmmaker, maybe not a great documentarian, but he does have strengths.
Wikipedia lists a documentary as "a broad category of visual expression that is based on the attempt, in one fashion or another, to "document" reality. Although "documentary film" originally referred to movies shot on film stock, it has subsequently expanded to include video and digital productions that can be either direct-to-video or made for a television series. Documentary, as it applies here, works to identify a "filmmaking practice, a cinematic tradition, and mode of audience reception" that is continually evolving and is without clear boundaries." It also says that director manipulation has been going on as early as the 1920's, and we kind of have to deal with it. Other terms that have been used are "mondo films" or "docu-ganda" to describe movies that some do not consider legitimate documentaries. In retrospect, I wish I would have talked about that in my review. I definitely agree that Moore could be compared to Oliver Stone. When I refer to his films as documentaries, I guess it's just because that is what genre they are apart of. I like the wikipedia definition. Whether any of us feel it is right or not, Moore is a documentarian. It is a term that does not have a clear cut meaning.
The Argument: Your ending comment about waiting for "Sicko" to come out on DVD applies to just about any film coming out today, so your comment implies that there is no urgency in going to see it. And where is the urgency to go see other films in theaters right away? There probably is none. Except for perhaps wanting to see some films on a big screen, there isn't a film around that cries out, "See me right now!" If anything, the urgency of the subject matter – and it is urgent – in Sicko does call for people to see this film now. Otherwise, we are saying that this isn't such a big issue after all and it can wait. We can no longer afford to let the Congress drag its feet on health care, but our representatives in Washington will continue to do just that (with the help of the insurance and pharmaceutical companies) until we run out, see a film like this immediately and call for action. Warts and all, it is asking all of us to act.
-- From Lou
The Reply: Well, in many ways this is an important film to see. The topic affects us, and the center statement Moore makes affects Americans. However, in my heart, I could not urge people to see it immediately because they are not receiving the whole picture of the issue. Will this film alter the perceptions of Congress? Perhaps, but doubtful. Our health care system might change one day, but Michael Moore will not be the savior. Sorry. This does not have as much power as An Inconvenient Truth. That wasn't perfect either, but I did tell folks to see that because it never hurts to help the environment. When I recommend a film, I do so with absolutely no doubts in my mind that that the person will enjoy it. Of course, not everyone likes the movies I commend, but that's the breaks. If I tell everyone I know to see Sicko right away, and the do, and subsequently disagree with his methods of conveying the material, they might not want my recommendation again. True, few films Transformers or Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End should be seen without delay, but many documentaries fall under the same category. As I said before, moviegoers should watch this, but at their own pace, preferably on DVD.
---
The Argument: I must say that I was intrigued by your review of Michael Moore's new movie, Sicko. Mr. Moore's techniques with his films were quite original to me the first time I saw them, but now I believe that he is allowing his political views to stray from "finding the truth". Some of the stories told in the movie (which I admit to not having seen… possibly I may in the future) are heartbreaking and one would hope this is the exception not the rule. But, there are large numbers of people that abuse our health system at every turn as well. I have a sister in law who is a chiropractor that is asked at least once a week to write fraudulent FMLA paperwork because her patients have missed work and don't want to face the music. Full coverage insurance has created people who go to the doctor for a sniffle just because they have low deductibles and little to no copay. If Mr. Moore would balance his movies with this type information I would respect him more as a filmmaker. I am originally from Detroit, Michigan so I was greatly intrigued by Roger and Me. But, with each film since I believe that Mr. Moore has lost track of what good influence he can have by presenting a positive and balanced snapshot of his documentary subjects.
--From Mike
The Reply: In Mr. Moore's defense, no one documentary could concentrate equally on every portion and flaw within the health care system. That is a mountain too high to climb. In the experiences of my own family, I could talk about various incidents that Sicko left out, but we can't ask too much from a 2 hour film. Moore does "stray from finding the truth", and it does hurt the rating of his offerings, but Moore has never tried to be truthful, honest, or impartial. He is a rabble-rouser above all else. Many of the interviews and stories were heartbreaking and worthwhile, and that is partially why I gave Sicko a positive score.
I want to note that in no way was this a column written to look at every argument about Michael Moore and Sicko. I don't have the time for that. I just thought it would be fun to examine some feedback on such a hot subject. I would like to thank everyone who sent feedback. It is always appreciated.
The News Bulletin
Harry Potter and the Mounds of Cash
Warner Bros.' "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix" whipped up a powerful potion at the box office with an estimated five-day bow of $140 million, the best non-holiday showing on record. Overseas, the wizardry was just as strong. "Phoenix" finished its five-day opening at $190.3 million from 61 markets for a worldwide total of $330 million. Stateside, holdovers displayed remarkable stamina. DreamWorks and Paramount's "Transformers" dropped only 49% in its second frame, with an estimated weekend take of $36 million from 4,050 locations for a new cume of $223 million. Coming in No. 3 and No. 4 were Disney-Pixar's "Ratatouille" and 20th Century Fox's "Live Free or Die Hard," which were down just 38% and 39%, respectively, in their third frames. "Ratatouille" made $18 million from 3,625 theaters for a new total of $143 million. "Live Free" crossed the $100 million mark at the box office, taking in $10.9 million from 3,201 locations for a new cume of $102.9 million. Warner Bros. also nabbed the No. 5 spot with laffer "License to Wed," which made roughly $7.4 million from 2,715 locations in its second frame, a mere 29% drop. Pic's new cume is $30.5 million. Michael Moore's docu "Sicko" fell off the top 10 list. Film made $2.6 million as it expanded to 756 locations for a new total of $15.8 million; a strong number for so early in the docu's run. "Phoenix's" weekend take was an estimated $77.4 million from a whopping 4,285 locations, combined with a Wednesday and Thursday take of $62.6 million. It's the best non-holiday, five-day opening in Hollywood history. Opening day take of $44.2 million was the best Wednesday opening ever.
I'm glad to see that Harry Potter 5 did well, which only means good things for the future of the franchise. The midnight screening I attended had to be split into 3 different theaters to accompany the people. The rest of the top 10 is comprised of holdovers. It should be noted that Moore's documentary fell off the list, but that was expected. It did well during its strong run. Next week, Hairspray and I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry try to dethrone Potter. I'm not certain that either will get #1. Two powerful films like that might cause the viewers to split down the middle. I'd look for Potter again.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Warners Ready for Potter's Departure
Warner Bros. is looking ahead to life after the end of its "Harry Potter" movie franchise by lining up another best-selling kid lit fantasy series, "Septimus Heap", to bring to the silver screen. Angie Sage is the author of the seven-book series; only three -- "Magyk", "Flyte" and "Physik" -- have been published so far. According to Variety, "the series revolves around two babies that are switched at birth: one a boy who discovers his birthright as the seventh son of a seventh son, and who is destined to become a powerful wizard; the other a girl who is fated to become a princess." The first entry in the planned franchise, "Septimus Heap: Magyk", will be produced by Karen Rosenfelt ("The Devil Wears Prada"). Sage will serve as executive producer.
It is good business sense for Warner Brothers to look for a new franchise as a rebound to Potter. However, they are asking for poor box office results, and harsh reviews by looking into a series involving wizards. Is it so bad to move on from Hogwarts? Why can't they adapt some novels of a different genre? That would mean actual research. What does this sound like to everyone that hasn't heard of them? A watered down Potter, despite the plot being a bit different. Maybe the books are good, but this is bad timing.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
An Onslaught of Wizard Films
The screen rights to Roderick Gordon and Brian Williams' forthcoming young adult novel series "Tunnels" has been snapped up by Relativity Media, which plans on turning it into a new franchise to be produced by Ryan Kavanaugh and Mark Canton. The first book will be published in the U.K. this summer and stateside next January. The Hollywood Reporter says Tunnels revolves around teenage Will Burrows, whose quest for his missing father leads him to a secret world of wizards.
THR adds that the producers and Relativity "hope to mine several hit films from the author's debut novels and replicate the success of the "Harry Potter" series. First-time authors Gordon and Williams have already completed a second "Tunnels" book and are now working on a third. The first book has more than $1 million in advance sales and prepublication rights in more than 21 languages."
And it keeps getting worse as the minutes pass. More wizards. Every author who can type wants to recreate the success of Harry Potter. I remember Sir Mix A-Lot saying you can't replicate the same hit twice. That is good advice to movie studios as well. The future of the fantasy genre is looking piss poor about now. It will be filled with nothing but shabby redo's, rip-offs, and re-takes on Potter and The Chronicles of Narnia. Of course, I want to be proven wrong. If a decent filmmaker is hired, and screenwriter who cares attacks the adaptation, then maybe the impossible can occur, but I doubt it.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Another Possible Spielberg Project
Steven Spielberg is reportedly mulling directing "The Trial of the Chicago 7" for DreamWorks. The screenplay was penned by Emmy winner Aaron Sorkin ("The West Wing", "Charlie Wilson's War). "Chicago 7" is part of a three-film deal that DreamWorks sealed with Sorkin, according to Variety. DreamWorks CEO and co-chairman Stacey Snider told the trade, "The quality of (Aaron's) work speaks to the kind of movies we want to make here at DreamWorks and we couldn't be happier to have him in our filmmaker family." Spielberg is said to have been developing "Chicago 7" with Sorkin and producers Walter Parkes and Laurie MacDonald for awhile now. The project recounts the trial that resulted after the infamous clash between protesters and cops at Chicago's 1968 Democratic convention.
What makes me laugh is that this must be the 20th project Spielberg is rumored to be involved with, or is pondering to direct or produce. In terms of directing, he has Lincoln and Interstellar on the horizon, and for producing, he has approximately 8-10 pieces lined up from films to mini-series. I wouldn't expect The Chicago 7 anytime soon. While I do think that this premise could made into something special with Spielberg attached and Sorkin penning the script, I just wonder what will come first for the legendary helmer after Indiana Jones IV wraps.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Watts Goes "International"
Sony's upcoming spy thriller "The International", starring Clive Owen, has another big name to add to its cast list. Naomi Watts has joined the picture, according to movie industry mag The Hollywood Reporter. Watts was last seen on the big screen in "The Painted Veil" and Peter Jackson's "King Kong." The plot of "The International" concerns an obsessive Interpol agent (Owen), who teams up with a New York district attorney (Watts) to take on and expose a powerful banking institution responsible for mayhem and murder around the world. Tom Tykwer ("Perfume", "Paris, je t'aime") is directing from a screenplay by first-time Hollywood writer Eric Singer.
It could be almost anybody starring in this film. What excites me is Tom Tykwer. He is rapidly becoming one of my favorite filmmakers after his contribution to Paris, je t'aime and Perfume, not to mention his efforts before that. The reason I say this is because on the surface, the storyline sounds only standard, but with Tykwer in the director's chair, it can instantly be an above average picture. I think Clive Owen and Naomi Watts would make a fine duo, and I am anxious to see who the supporting cast members will be. The wild card is Eric Singer, who literally has no resume, but I am sure this will turn out ok. It hits theaters in 2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Ember City Has More Residents
Tim Robbins, Martin Landau, Marianne Jean-Baptiste, Harry Treadaway have joined 20th Century Fox's fantasy "City of Ember" reports the trades. The Gil Kenan-directed, Walden Media/Playtone project has Robbins playing an inventor holding a secret to the magical, glitteringly lit city whose power generator is failing. Landau will play the boss of Robbins' character's teen son (Treadaway), who works at the city's mysterious Pipeworks as the son seeks to save the city with a fellow teen. Jean-Baptiste will play a tough greenhouse worker. Bill Murray, Toby Jones and Saoirse Ronan are already set to co-star. An October 2008 theatrical release is already planned through Fox. Shooting is presently under way in Belfast, Ireland.
The only previous claim to fame for Gil Kenan is Monster House, which was an extremely worthwhile CGI horror film for children. However, this is live-action, a completely different territory. Though it's still adventure and fantasy, it remains unclear if his talent can transition to from animation to a totally different front. If all else fails, he has a brilliant cast backing him up all the way, and the plot sounds very creative and fascinating. Tim Robbins and Bill Murray in the same movie should be swell for sure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Behold the Son of Ace Ventura
Young Josh Flitter has signed to star in the third "Ace Ventura" movie, with David Mickey Evans ("The Sandlot", "The Final Season") directing. The Jim Carrey-less sequel sees the son ("Nancy Drew" star Flitter) of the oddball detective step into his father's shoes to take over the family business. Animals, Impersonations and Captain Stubing appearances ensue. "Well, basically my kids run my career", Evans exclusively told Moviehole. "After the Final Season got picked up by Sony/Yari for theatrical release, I had a bunch of offers and scripts on my desk. I asked my 9, 11, and 15 year olds what they wanted me to do. And they said, "Dad, you're doing Ace Ventura 3!. I don't know if the fact that the film shoots in Orlando (Disney World, Universal Orlando, etc etc…) had anything to with their marching orders, but I suspect it did. Nonetheless, the challenge of trying to meet the expectation of a sequel to one of the funniest movies in the last 30 years appealed to me. Done deal. Cut. Print. Moving on! Done deal. "…plus I really wanted to work with Jim Robinson and David Robinson at Morgan Creek. The opportunity to cross paths with their brand of creative support is rare and I wasn't about to pass that up." Jeff Sank, Jason Heimberg and Justin Heimberg penned the screenplay.
You see the picture above. That correct, the little chubby kid from License to Wed and Nancy Drew is going to be Ace's son? What person makes these decisions and the stands by them? Of all the children performers on the planet Earth, they choose a kid that does not fit with the series at all. Sure, Flitter is a comical kid, but seriously, this is shaping up to be worse than Son of the Mask and Dumb and Dumberer if you can imagine that. Plus, Director David Evans has one recommended film to his resume, and that is The Sandlot. I'll be sprinting to the video stores for this Direct-to-DVD garbage.
The 20 Second Sermon
A rumor is floating that a Cars sequel might be on the way after Toy Story 3, and cause John Carter of Mars to be pushed back. I'm all for a sequel, but not if it means delaying John Carter. That character has been thrown around too long. Michael Moore has stated the next topic for a documentary of his might be homosexuality. Ummm…ok. What ever suits your fancy I guess. Ethan Hawke has gone on record that a third Sunset film will not happen, and Richard Linklater backs it up. Good, they need to be left alone. More gossip is in the air about Vin Diesel starring in The Fast and The Furious 4. Who cares?! For the love of God no more! Schwarzeneggar will not be Sgt. Rock after all. Duh. The studio is pursuing a director and a star. My hopes aren't high for anyone special. Transformers 2 could be a prequel, which means it will suck big time. Get ready for Speed 3: Highway to Hell with Dennis Hopper. Yes, you read that right, but how, and why? The studios are torturing us with sequels to such wretched films.
What's Coming to DVD….Buy or Avoid?
DVD Headline of the Week
Factory Girl (Unrated) - No, this is not the greatest film ever, but as far as this week goes, I am recommending it because it was underrated. The performances are great, and warrant a look. Buy
Premonition - You know, Sandra Bullock is sexy and talented, but who would know that from her dismal films. This was no different. Avoid
Red Dawn (Collector's Edition) - Ehh, this wasn't my cup of tea, but most people opinions were split, so if you like this, here is a double dip. Avoid
Avenue Montaigne - I saw this foreign flick playing in certain theaters, but it never caught my fancy to spend money on it.
Showgirls (Fully Exposed Edition) - Man did I hate this movie. I have nothing against seeing Saved by the Bell's Elizabeth Berkley naked, but the movie was a large turd. Avoid
Transformers - In my own mind, I knew that Michael Bay's action extravaganza based on the popular 80's cartoon show would be an experience on par with 1996's Independence Day. It is a triumph of a summer blockbuster in terms of box office results, and as for quality, it is adequate. After this year passes, no one will worry about Transformers until a sequel rolls around. All in all, I had a fun time watching this. It was a silly, loud, and exhilarating form of escapist trash. Shia LeBeouf is growing and maturing fabulously for an actor his age. It's remarkable how he acts as glue for the meaningless destruction that transpires. This if a film absolutely stuffed to the seams with gratuitous humor, but that is part of the enjoyment. Anthony Anderson, John Turturro, and Tyrese Gibson all supply an equal amount of one-liners and wisecracks. What a treat it was to hear Peter Cullen's Optimus Prime voice amongst live-action performers. Hugo Weaving as Megatron was also a nice touch. The most memorable portions for me were the initial appearances of the Autobots and Decepticons. Starscream, Ironhide, and the whole bunch make fantastic entrances with Steve Jablonsky's score. Is this a perfect film? Whoa, slow down…of course not. That was never the intention. This was made so followers of the show, collectors of the toys, or anyone who has heard of them could have that refreshing air of nostalgia hit them as some iconic characters grace the screen once more. I'd probably put this on par with Transformers: The Movie. Both had flaws, but were generally entertaining. The 80's rock soundtrack on the animated effort was awkward for me. Nonetheless, this is all about going to the theater, sitting back, and admiring the mayhem. Final Rating = 7.0/10.0
License to Wed - I just did not have the energy or the time to see this. My bad.
Movievision Weekly
Monday The Godfather, Part II - Of course this is a masterpiece. It's one of the best films ever made, and it is glorious to watch at any time. Catch Francis Ford Coppola's classic sequel on AMC at 8pm. ****
Beerfest - The Broken Lizard clan are not for everyone, but I think their style of comedy is hilarious. This is the ultimate party film. Having this movie play in the background while drinking beer with friends is a great time. This airs on Cinemax at 8 pm. ***
Tuesday Drive Me Crazy - Melissa Joan Hart and Adrien Grenier star in this cheesy teen film. I guess I didn't hate this, but looking back, it really was stupid. Though I noticed Grenier had talent here. This will be on Comedy Central at 5 pm. **1/2
Young Guns II - The sequel to the first film, in my mind, was better, but still not anything special. This series was cliché, formulaic, and preposterously executed. If you crave messy Westerns, it starts on CMT at 10 pm. **1/2
Wednesday The Untouchables - Brian DePalma's fine gangster tale, adapted from the television series. I wouldn't call it a classic, but it was entertaining as hell, and the cast was magnificent. This is on AMC at 8 pm. ***1/2
Butch and Sundance: The Early Days - A prequel starring Tom Berenger and William Katt that I have been meaning to watch for some time now. I am one who disliked the original with Newman and Redford, but I still am curious about this. It airs on FMC at 5 pm.
Thursday Mission Impossible - This Tom Cruise franchise has gotten gradually better as time goes along, but the first one frustrated me to death. The action scenes are incredibly idiotic, and it was too little of Emilio Estevez. Catch this on USA at 7:30 pm. **1/2
Gangs of New York - Quite simply an underrated Scorsese masterpiece. This film is unbelievable and outstanding with superb acting, brilliant set design, and a fabulous plot. I love it now just as much as when I first saw it. This is on USA at 4:30 pm. ****
Movie Dictionary: Word of the Week
No Budget Film - A no budget film is an extremely cheaply produced film made with very little, or no money. Young directors starting out in filmmaking commonly use this method because there are few other options available to them at that point. All the actors and technicians are employed without remuneration. The film is largely non-profit. Usually the director works alone on such films, or uses a very minimum "crew" of volunteers to assist him/her on such projects where no money or financing is available, not including the cost of film.
Many experimental films have been made in this no budget manner. In 1960, Ron Rice released "The Flower Thief", starring Taylor Mead, to great acclaim. The film was produced for less than $1000.00 using black and white 16mm 50' film cartridges left over from aerial gunnery equipment used during World War II. In the early 1960s, filmmaker Jack Smith used discarded color reversal film stock to film his no budget film classic, featuring Mario Montez, called "Flaming Creatures." Some directors' early works, such as John Waters' 1964 black and white film with Mary Vivian Pearce, "Hag in a Black Leather Jacket", which cost $30.00 to make, are no budget films. Craig Baldwin's "Flick Skin" is entirely made from discarded film, or 'found footage' as it is known as, retrieved from a projectionist's booth. The No Wave Cinema movement of the late 1970s, represented by filmmakers such as Vivienne Dick, produced many notable no budget films shot on Super 8 such as "Beauty Becomes The Beast" starring Lydia Lunch, as did the Cinema of Transgression in the 1980s. Most of the films featured in Miranda July's film anthologies "Joanie4Jackie", which were first released in 1996 and are still ongoing, are made with no budget. In 1993, Sarah Jacobson made her first film "I Was a Teenage Serial Killer" with, she says, "one camera, one tape recorder, one mic and, like, four lights"
.
Filming for no budget films are often done on location without permission, which is referred to as 'Guerrilla filmmaking', using sites such as the home of the filmmaker or their friends, in the backyard or local neighbourhood. No budget films have often been made in the past using Super 8 mm film or video. Recent films have also been made using digital film cameras and edited using home computer editing programmes. The cost of a no budget film is generally that of the film, and the film processing, itself.
No budget films have frequently been screened at Super 8 film festivals which are held around the world, such as the Flicker Film Festival in Los Angeles in the U.S., and Splice This in Toronto, in Canada. In the UK, Exploding Cinema is a group devoted to no budget and experimental film who hold regular screenings. Many No Wave directors screened their films at clubs and bars. Others set up DIY screenings. Some no budget films are transferred to video and DVD and can be obtained at alternative outlets or by mail. In the 2000s, some no budget directors began to show their films on the internet, either on their own websites or sites devoted to such films.
It is rare that a no budget film manages to receive recognition; only a handful have achieved any level of acclaim, but it is possible. They sometimes arise from subcultures existing outside of the mainstream and so also become important documents of the various movements and scenes that they originated from. While generally ignored by the commercial film sector, they have, on occasion, garnered much recognition in the world of alternative culture and arts.
Based on the Trailer…
Newest Trailers
In the Valley of Elah - The newest Paul Haggis directed picture does look remarkable by the trailer, but I am not fully convinced yet. I will be looking forward to it though. The cast is magnificent. Trailer Rating = 8.0/10.0
Margot at the Wedding - Noah Baumbach's newest offering looks watchable, but I wish he would concentrate on serious topics instead of just comedy. Nevertheless, this could be very good. Trailer Rating = 7.0/10.0
Elizabeth: The Golden Age - This is too desperate a cry for Oscars. It might appeal to some, but I smell a tedious humdrum drama. Oh well, you never know. Trailer Rating = 6.0/10.0
Fred Claus - The teaser trailer was funny, but this shows me that the humor stopped there. It is banking on Vince Vaughn, but I am not impressed. I love Paul Giamatti, but not as Santa. Trailer Rating = 5.0/10.0
10,000 B.C. - I'm not sure if this wants to be Apocalypto or Pathfinder. Either way it is helmed by Roland Emmerich, so it is likely to blow aside from the special effects. Trailer Rating = 6.0/10.0
The Water Horse: Legend of the Deep - The "loch ness" angle in the story intrigues me, but I'd bet this is a Free Will tale all over again. No thanks. Trailer Rating = 6.5/10.0
July Releases
Hairspray - This doesn't seem like it will be all that terrible. I viewed this trailer as a fun looking musical with a glorious cast. Travolta will be spectacular. Trailer Rating = 8.0/10.0
Talk to Me - Don Cheadle as a risky radio jockey. This looks to have potential, but it's not the role Cheadle is capable of shining most in. Trailer Rating = 6.5/10.0
The Simpsons Movie - I am not the biggest Simpsons fan, but this trailer is hilarious. Maybe this movie won't be all that terrible. Trailer Rating = 8.0/1.0
I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry - Boy does this look bad. I am sorry to say that, but I will only be seeing this because of Jessica Biel in her underwear. That is worth the price of admission. Otherwise this is the regular Sandler hijincks. Trailer Rating = 6.0/10.0
No Reservations - I love Aaron Eckhart, and the whole world adores Abigail Breslin, but this romantic comedy appears to be disappointing. I am not enticed. Trailer Rating = 6.0/10.0
Sunshine - This new film by Danny Boyle looks outstanding. I can't wait to see it. We could use some good sci-fi. Trailer Rating = 10.0/10.0
I Know Who Killed Me - This Lindsay Lohan stripper mystery thriller is billed as like it wants to be a spin off of I Know What You Did Last Summer. It looks ok enough to see, but will probably disappoint. Trailer Rating = 7.0/10.0
August Releases
El Cantante - Marc Anthony and Jennifer Lopez get to do a movie together…yay. This appears to be your typical musician rises to fame, goes to drugs, vH1 Behind the Music story romance. I am not intrigued yet. Trailer Rating = 6.5/10.0
Bratz - Wow, a worse looking movie cannot be found anywhere. The show was a piece of sh**, and this will be also. Trailer Rating = 2.0/10.0
Daddy Day Camp - This looks beyond dreadful. Cuba Gooding Jr. must be taking anything he can get these days. I will not be seeing this one. Trailer Rating = 4.0/10.0
Hot Rod - I do not expect this to be much of a sleeper hit, but I could be wrong. The preview is funny, but not hysterical. The concept is very promising. Trailer Rating = 6.5/10.0
Superbad - This looks like it could be funny. The kid from Accepted was hysterical, and since Seth Rogen is a big part of the cast and crew, I will definitely give this a shot. Trailer Rating = 7.5/10.0
Rush Hour 3 - This is only a clip of the upcoming second sequel, but it is absolutely hilarious. I was surprised by how funny this was actually. I can't wait for an actual trailer to surface. Trailer/Clip Rating = 9.0/10.0
Rush Hour 3 - I reviewed the first clip, and it was hilarious, but the full trailer was not as funny. This looks like fun, but more of the same. Trailer Rating = 7.5/10.0
War - A Jason Statham and Jet Li actioner. The fights should be nice, and the action as well, but the plot looks paper thin. Trailer Rating = 6.5/10.0
The Invasion - The millionth Invasion of the Body Snatchers remake. I am not enthused by Mr. Bond's choices lately. I guess this could look worse. Trailer Rating = 6.5/10.0
The Bourne Ultimatum - Paul Greengrass is a great filmmaker, and this looks like a kick ass action flick, and hopefully a fitting chapter to the franchise. Trailer Rating = 8.5/10.0
Resident Evil: Extinction - This was an average teaser trailer. I'm still not sure how this will turn out though. Trailer Rating = 7.0/10.0
Underdog - Jason Lee sounds funny as the voice of this dog, but the preview does not catch my fancy. I hope it isn't as awful as it appears. This and Firehouse Dog will not cause the dog genre to make a comeback I think. Trailer Rating = 6.0/10.0
Halloween - Call me nuts, but this could be a surprisingly innovative re-imagination of the John Carpenter classic. I was not disgusted by the teaser, and I usually am. I hope this is solid. Good remakes are few and far between. Trailer Rating = 7.5/10.0
Penelope - This movie looks so strange. Christina Ricci has a nice like a pig and she's looking for a man. Whatever. Trailer Rating = 5.0/10.0
Stardust - With an all-star cast, this looks extremely bizarre. I'm not sure what I think yet, especially with Michelle Pfeiffer playing some ugly looking witch. It actually looks pretty bad after one viewing. Trailer Rating = 6.0/10.0
Balls of Fury - A new comedy with Christopher Walken. Some parts made me laugh, but overall I thought this looked dumb. Trailer Rating = 5.0/10.0
The Hunting Party - Richard Gere is reliable, but Terrence Howard is not, so we shall see how this Bosnian war thriller unravels. The plot is based on a true story, so I am enthused. Trailer Rating = 7.5/10.0
The King of Kong: A Fistful of Quarters - This documentary looks great. I was always terrible at Donkey Kong myself, but I'd go see this. Trailer Rating = 8.0/10.0
September Releases
The Kingdom - If Chris Cooper is involved, I'm there. Oh yeah, Jamie Foxx and Jennifer Garner are in this Iraqui actioner too. Trailer Rating = 8.0/10.0
Across the Universe - From Julie Taymor, this odd looking flick has a trailer well constructed and eye catching. Because it grabs your attention, I will give this a chance. Trailer Rating = 8.0/10.0
The Brave One - This new Jodie Foster thriller/drama doesn't look all that bad. It has a Boondock Saints spin on it that intrigues me. Trailer Rating = 7.5/10.0
Eastern Promises - If this weren't directed by David Cronenberg, I wouldn't care much, but it is, so I do. Viggo Mortensen joins the helmer again for a mob thriller that looks to have gritty flair. Trailer Rating = 8.5/10.0
October, TBD, and Beyond Releases
3:10 to Yuma - It looks as if they have incorporated a lot more shooting and violence into this remake. I really dug the original, and with this cast, I will most certainly give this a shot. Trailer Rating = 7.5/10.0
Bee Movie - This is the second trailer. It is much funnier. I can't wait to see this. It's not made by Pixar, yet it still looks good. Trailer Rating = 8.5/10.0
The Savages - With Philip Seymour Hoffman and Laura Linney. This looks pretty funny, and with two outstanding performers, it should be halfway decent. Trailer Rating = 7.5/10.0
National Treasure: Book of Secrets - I loved the first film, despite harsh reviews. They are entertaining. This one looks more of the same adventure of history. It's right up my alley. Trailer Rating = 8.5/10.0
The Heartbreak Kid - The new Farrelly brothers comedy with Ben Stiller. It looks shockingly formulaic in my opinion. I am sure it will be funny, but we'll have to wait to see how good. Trailer Rating = 7.0/10.0
American Gangster - This is the one I have been waiting for, and it does not disappoint, and least by the looks of this preview anyway. I was surprised by the music contained, but this new Ridley Scott flick looks great. Trailer Rating = 9.0/10.0
Enchanted - This started as a good trailer, but mixing live-action and animation is always risky, and this looks kind of stupid. Amy Adams has the cute thing down for the role, but she can do better. Trailer Rating = 5.0/10.0
Vantage Point - Hmmm. I'm not sure about this political thriller. The cast is fine, but will that matter if the film blows hard? Trailer Rating = 7.0/10.0
I Am Legend - This is what I call a brilliantly constructed trailer. It gives you just enough to be excited, and then rips it away from you. I can't wait. Trailer Rating = 9.0/10.0
Hitman - Audience members went crazy for this teaser trailer, but I was just kind of sitting there solemnly. I like Timothy Olyphant, so maybe this will be passable, but I doubt it. Trailer Rating = 7.0/10.0
Wall-E - Another Pixar classic is under our belt, and I can't wait for the next one. This robotic adventure should be great, and easily superior to Robots. Trailer Rating = 10.0/10.0
Mr. Magorium's Wonder Emporium - This looks bizarre. I like Dustin Hoffman and Natalie Portman, so I'll give it a chance, but I'm not sure yet. Is it supposed to be reminiscent of Willy Wonka or something. Trailer Rating = 7.0/10.0
Lions for Lambs - You would think a film with such a powerful cast (Cruise, Streep) and director (Redford) might entice me more, but this did not. I hope it's good, but right now I have no emotion. Trailer Rating = 6.5/10.0
Gone Baby Gone - BY far the best preview I've seen in awhile. Ben Affleck directs his brother and an all-star cast in the adaptation of a novel from the author of Mystic River. This looks fantastic. Trailer Rating = 10.0/10.0
Other Stuff to Read
411 July Roundtable - This month I compiled the thoughts of the movie zone staff on the summer releases of July!
Fact or Fiction - Ben Piper gathers the thoughts of Ben Moser and Jeff
