www.411mania.com
|  News |  Film Reviews |  Columns |  DVD/Other Reviews |  News Report | Search
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// New Moon Breaks Dark Knight's Single Day Box Office Record!!
MUSIC
// Top Ten Albums from 2005
WRESTLING
// 411 PPV Roundtable Preview: WWE Survivor Series 2009
POLITICS
// 411 Politics RoundTable: Thoughts On The Ft. Hood Massacre
MMA
// 411's Roundtable Preview - UFC 106: Ortiz vs. Griffin 2
BOXING
// 411 Roundtable Preview: Kessler vs. Ward
GAMES
// Top 10 Action Role Playing Games




MOVIE REVIEW  MOVIE REVIEWS
//  The Twilight Saga: New Moon Review
//  Precious: Based on the Novel Push by Sapphire Review
//  Pirate Radio Review
//  Fantastic Mr. Fox Review
//  2012 Review
//  The House of the Devil Review
 HOT MOVIES
//  Iron Man 2
//  The Avengers
//  Watchmen
//  Transformers 2
//  Bruno
//  G.I. Joe
//  The Hobbit
SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds





Follow 411mania on Twitter!




Add 411 On Facebook
 



 
 411mania » Movies » Columns
Advertisement
Casting Call 07.29.08: Issue 64 - Batman's Rogues Gallery
Posted by Jason Chamberlain on 07.29.2008





Can good exist without evil?

It's one of those questions that old men sit on mountains to try and figure out. Can there ever be a world without evil? Can light exist without dark?

It may be an impossible question to answer. But one thing I'm pretty sure of is this; every super hero needs his super villains.

Try to imagine what life would be like for a super hero if he had no evil doers to fight. What would be the point? Take Batman, for example. Can you envision a movie where, for two hours, Bats walks around with a smile on his face, getting pats on the back from grateful citizens, not so much as litter messing up the streets?

It would be pretty damn boring.

As much as we want to see the hero succeed, it's the journeys he takes – his troubles along the way - that entertain us.

So like every other superhero, Batman owes a lot of his popularity to the quality of his enemies. And both ‘Batman Begins' and ‘The Dark Knight' have benefitted from strong, well constructed villains. This column will feature spoilers for both films.

Four ‘main' villains have been showcased in the first four films, all of them classic Batman villains with plenty of history in the comics. Scarecrow, Ras Al Ghul, The Joker and Two-Face.

Of the three, Scarecrow is the simplest to understand. His true identity is psychiatrist Jonathan Crane, the director of Arkham Asylum, home for Gotham's criminally insane. In truth, Crane is a sadistic criminal running experiments on his inmates, and he creates a fear toxin that makes his victims worst fears seemingly come to life. In the first film, he does so to aid an alliance with Ras Al Ghul, but by 'Dark Knight' he has transformed into a drug lord selling his fear toxin to those looking for an extreme kick. His impact on Gotham is negligible at this point, and he's an easy catch for Batman.

Most importantly, Scarecrow doesn't raise serious issues for Batman. He doesn't force Batman to confront deep dark secrets or to rethink the reasoning behind his crusade for justice. He's a criminal, Batman catches him, and that's that.

The remaining three villains, however, are infinitely more personal, and they each bring Batman to the brink of giving up, or at the very least breaking his one crime fighting rule.

Batman's primary reason for being, of course, is the sudden and brutal loss of his parents at a young age. He is an adult in a Tibetan jail when he meets "Ducard" (really Ras Al Ghul) who recruits him to the League of Shadows, a group of warriors who believe in using whatever means necessary to achieve peace and harmony.

Of course, the League proves to be a little more villainous than they originally let on. Though they may believe their intentions are serving the greater good, they take innocent lives in the pursuit of their goals, which is something Bruce Wayne cannot bring himself to do. His split with the League, and with Ras, is difficult because on some levels, Ras had become something of a surrogate father to him. Not only had he given him instruction in the ways of battle, he had taught him to confront the darkness in his heart and to utilize it in order to protect others. The two obviously shared a friendship and so, when Ras arrives in Gotham and the extent of his plan becomes clear, Batman is forced to battle a friend and a mentor all in one.

Villains are always at their most interesting when they don't consider themselves to be villains! In the case of Ras, he believes he is doing good work. He believes that destroying by Gotham, even its innocent citizens, the rest of the world will move back towards harmony. Batman, on the other hand, believes in saving Gotham and its people. So who's right?

The problem with Ras approach (aside from, you know, the loss of innocent life) is that he has given himself the power to decide who lives and who dies. It's a power too great for any man, yet he thinks he can wield it responsibly. However, destroying Gotham is something Batman has a big problem with, and so the two naturally end up on opposite sides.

But in the course of fighting Ras, Batman is forced to take another look at his crime fighting philosophy and ask himself if he can make a real difference without stooping to the lows of the League of Shadows.

Good intentions turned bad is a theme that is once again explored in Dark Knight, this time through the character of Harvey Dent, Gotham's ‘white knight' and district attorney who is prepared to go to great (and entirely legal) lengths to clean up his city. And his approach is working, so much so that he becomes the target of twisted sociopath The Joker. Dent is eventually abducted, as is his fiancé Rachel, and left to die amongst explosives. Rachel is killed, and though Batman reaches Dent in time to save him, he is still near enough to the explosion to suffer horrific burns to the left side of his body. Dent is dead (at least, half of him is) and Two Face is born.

The rage and agony coursing through Dent after he is injured is incredible, and a once just man is immediately transformed into a raging force of vengeance, punishing everyone he believes to be responsible for Rachel's death and for his pain. He leaves his crimes to chance, flipping a coin to decide whether each of his victims will live or die. He is even prepared to murder Commissioner Gordon's young son as retribution for Gordon's perceived betrayal.

Dent's twisted quest for revenge is markedly different from Batman's pursuit of justice. Batman also has suffered the loss of the most important people in his life, but instead of punishing people for his pain, he dedicates himself to ensuring that nobody else will ever have to feel the way he does. Dent, on the other hand, loses reason and becomes obsessed with ensuring he can take as many people with him as he can.

Dent's loss was also Batman's loss, as Rachel was a childhood friend and an unrequited love. He is as devastated by her death as anyone, but he still doesn't seek the ultimate revenge that Dent does. And one must wonder what Rachel would have thought of what becomes of the man she loved once she's gone. Certainly she wouldn't approve of his vengeful actions, as she once slapped Bruce Wayne twice just for wanting to kill the man who had killed his parents.

And then, there's the man responsible for Rachel's death, whose reign of chaos over Gotham causes havoc, and makes Batman question his very beliefs.

The Joker.

The Joker is devoid of goodness. There's no light to his dark. He has no back story, no origin, no justification for his state. He is simply evil. He may not even consider himself to be, but he is. He is a self proclaimed agent of chaos, who acts without any thought, without any plan. He even describes himself as a dog chasing cars that wouldn't know what to do with one if he caught it. He doesn't kill, maim and destroy for any reason other than his desire to create chaos in Gotham. To take the white knights and drag them down to his depraved level.

As Alfred states, The Joker is not looking for anything logical. He can't be bought, bullied, reasoned or negotiated with. He just wants to watch the world burn.

What is Batman to do with an enemy that simply will not stop until he is dead? His one rule is that he will not become an executioner, but he seriously considers breaking that rule to bring an end to the Joker's terrorist acts. It can be argued extensively whether or not killing him would be justified, but Batman has a strict moral code and he knows that breaking it even once will be his first step down an increasingly dark path. Even the Joker himself marvels at how truly incorruptible Batman is.

The Joker himself is incapable of such limitations. Throughout the film he unveils increasingly more perverse and disturbing traits and actions, and he is fighting what he calls a battle for Gotham's soul. That's why he tries so hard to show the ugliness in Gotham's chosen heroes, and he is most successful with Dent, whose degeneration into Two Face is shockingly fast and brutal.

Does the Joker 'win' because of the depths to which Dent falls? Or does he lose because no matter what he does, he can't make Batman sink to his level?

In the end, he doesn't even really care. Even as Batman leaves him hanging (literally) above the streets of Gotham, he is cackling with glee. As long as Batman is fighting for control, The Joker will find a way to fight for chaos.

After all, he's giving Gotham a better class of criminal.


Post Comment (8)  |  Email Jason Chamberlain  |  View Jason Chamberlain's 411 Profile

  Send To Friend  |    Stumble It!  |    Digg It!  | 



Please add your comment below.
If you are registered, you can login and post under your registered name. If not, you can post as a guest or register.

* Please note that 411 moderates all comments. Your comment will show up on the site after it has been approved by an editor.
 
Name : 
Comment : 
Remaining Characters : 
2800
 

Comments (8)

 
Great work. Reading all of this made me want to go see the Dark Knight again.

Posted By: Dirk (Registered)  on July 29, 2008 at 01:22 AM

 
 
ya, great column

Posted By: furey (Guest)  on July 29, 2008 at 02:18 AM

 
 
Better actors would be required for the sequel, of course. Having the first gay Batman, with Christian Bale, was the first genuinely real bad vibe this series took.

Posted By: Kill_Bird (Guest)  on July 29, 2008 at 03:04 AM

 
 
Excellent Column. Your perceptions on the purpose of all the characters are right on. Christopher Nolan has done a masterful job with the way he has portrayed the villians in these two movies so far. Especially The Dark Knight. To me you could make the arguement that Ledger's Joker and Eckhart's Two Face are two of if not the TWO BEST super villians of all time. Ledger's Joker may even be one of the best villians in the history of movies period. Like The Joker said "This city deserves a better class of criminal". To me anyone that has seen this movie was privledged to get a better class of villian in The Joker.

Posted By: Brian (Guest)  on July 29, 2008 at 04:20 AM

 
 
Kill Bird:

"the first gay Batman"?

Have you SEEN Batman & Robin?


Posted By: KanyonKreist (Registered)  on July 29, 2008 at 12:49 PM

 
 
Hmmm a gay Batman?

I think if they were gonna do that they'd get Will and Jack.

Now THATS funny! BOOK IT!!


Posted By: CM Wolf (Guest)  on July 29, 2008 at 02:20 PM

 
 
Did anyone else get the vibe that Gordon's son is being primed to be Robin?

Posted By: JP (Guest)  on July 29, 2008 at 06:09 PM

 
 
Thanks for reading and commenting guys!

Posted By: Jason Chamberlain (Registered)  on August 05, 2008 at 05:05 PM

 


www.41mania.com
Copyright © 2005 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.