www.411mania.com
|  News |  Film Reviews |  Columns |  DVD/Other Reviews |  News Report | Search
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// New Moon Breaks Dark Knight's Single Day Box Office Record!!
MUSIC
// Pics From Miley Cyrus Indianapolis Concert
WRESTLING
// 411 PPV Roundtable Preview: WWE Survivor Series 2009
POLITICS
// 411 Politics RoundTable: Thoughts On The Ft. Hood Massacre
MMA
// Click Here To Join 411’s LIVE UFC 106: Ortiz vs. Griffin II Coverage
BOXING
// 411 Roundtable Preview: Kessler vs. Ward
GAMES
// Top 10 Action Role Playing Games




MOVIE REVIEW  MOVIE REVIEWS
//  The Twilight Saga: New Moon Review [2]
//  The Twilight Saga: New Moon Review
//  Precious: Based on the Novel Push by Sapphire Review
//  Pirate Radio Review
//  Fantastic Mr. Fox Review
//  2012 Review
 HOT MOVIES
//  Iron Man 2
//  The Avengers
//  Watchmen
//  Transformers 2
//  Bruno
//  G.I. Joe
//  The Hobbit
SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds





Follow 411mania on Twitter!




Add 411 On Facebook
 



 
 411mania » Movies » Film Reviews
Advertisement
Transformers: Revenge Of The Fallen Review
Posted by Jeffrey Harris on 06.24.2009



TRANSFORMERS: REVENGE OF THE FALLEN

Directed By: Michael Bay
Written By: Ehren Kruger, Alex Kurtzman, and Roberto Orci
Runtime: 150 minutes
MPAA Rating: Rated PG-13 for intense sequences of sci-fi action violence, language, some crude and sexual material, and brief drug material.

Sam Witwicky - Shia LeBeouf
Mikaela Banes - Megan Fox
Optimus Prime - Peter Cullen (voice)
Megatron - Hugo Weaving (voice)
Lennox - Josh Duhamel
Epps - Tyrese Gibson
Simmons - John Tuturro
Leo - Ramon Rodriguez
Ron Witwicky - Kevin Dunn
Judy Witwicky - Julie White
General Morshower - Glenn Morshower
Ironhide - Jess Harnell
Skids/Mudflaps/Wheelie - Tom Kenny
Starscream - Charles Adler
Soundwave - Frank Welker
The Fallen - Tony Todd
Alice - Isabel Lucas
Galloway - John Benjamin Hickey



Let me preface this review by saying, I highly enjoy spectacles. I enjoy good summer blockbusters. I like guns, boobs, and monsters. All I ask is that the effort is made to execute it coherently. I mean, I admit I'm hypocritical when I absolutely loathe Hollywood constantly churning out an endless stream of garbage remakes, reboots, sequels, rehashes, and adaptations . . . but then my favorite movie so far this year was the new Star Trek. The one and only paragon/pariah, Michael Bay, in his new sequel, Transformers: Revenge Of The Fallen, delivers a gigantic summer spectacle that completely goes off the rails and crashes and burns horribly. And I get that I sound like a hater. I get the whole "check your brain at the door" mentality and just enjoy all the pretty FX and 'splosions. Whenever it comes on, I'll watch The Rock, and I enjoy The Rock. The new Transformers movie just goes out of its way to make you not want to like it and enjoy it and all those things that you didn't like about the first movie are back 100 fold and glaringly worse.

Following the events of Transformers, two years have passed and the Autobots have formed an alliance with the American military in a group called Nest in order to take out the remaining Decepticon forces that are still on Earth. After dispatching the Decepticon Demolisher in a visible, damaging battle in Shanghai, Demolisher speaks of the Fallen returning to have revenge. The government assigns the government douchebag every one of these movie needs in Galloway (Hickey) to be a douchebag to the Autobots and kick them off the Earth since the government thinks that the remaining Decepticons are just after the Autobots, while Optimus Prime (Cullen once again reprising the vocal role) feels differently. Optimus believe the Decepticons are after something. And the Decepticon Soundwave (Welker) having merged with a military satellite is able to get the bearings of one of the last remaining shards of the destroyed All Spark cube. Soundwave sends Ravage to retrieve the shard which the Decepticons are able to use to revive Megatron (Weaving) who isn't happy with Starscream sort of assuming command in the interim. Megatron however apparently has a boss called the Fallen who is aware that the information of the All Spark has transformed and been absorbed by the one and only Sam Witwicky (LeBeouf) who is now preparing to leave home for college.

Sam's off to college while being henpecked by his still gloriously annoying parents Ron (Dunn) and Judy (White). Sam's determined to keep his relationship strong with hottie mechanic Mikaela (Fox) even though he's moving out of town. However, off to college, Sam absorbed all the remaining knowledge of the All Spark cube from a small fragment that was left in his hoodie from the first movie. When Sam goes to college this causes Sam's head to explode with Cybertronian knowledge and history and Sam starts disrupting Rainn Wilson's astronomy class by drawing weird symbols. The Decepticons figure out Sam's location and hunt Sam down determined to retrieve the knowledge from his brain and first try using a Decepticon disguised as a comely college lass (Lucas) which Mikaela stumbles on after heading to Sam's school when Decepticon stool pigeon Wheelie (Kenny) tries to steel the tiny All Spark fragment. So Mikaela, Sam, and Sam's conspiracy theorist/blogger roommate Leo (Rodriguez) high tail it out of dodge, but the Decepticons are in hot pursuit. Optimus Prime intervenes to save Sam, but Optimus is mortally wounded in the process. Sam and co. hide from the Decepticons, but Megatron reveals their existence to the world demanding Sam Witwicky or they start destroying cities. Sam and his friends figure out that Sam's symbols are some sort of map to an Energon source, the key to transformer life, and must figure out exactly what the Decepticons are after which includes the Matrix of Leadership. A powwow with an old seeker transformer Jetfire reveals that the matrix might have the power to revive Optimus, but the same power also activates an ancient machine the oldest transformers left on planet Earth. A machine that will destroy the sun in order to harvest Energon.

Got all that?

The problem with this movie, is that anything you were willing to put up with in the first Transformers is back and its even worse. And I'm not a snob. I get it. I know this all started with a bunch of toys and the cartoon was made to sell toys. The original Transformers cartoon itself was actually quite ridiculous and silly at times with lots of continuity and animation errors throughout. But I think what the cartoon and what later cartoons did have was some good Transformers characters and a decent plot. This became even more apparent with Beast Wars which remains the creative peak of Transformers mythology that really delivered on every level.

But yes, this is Bay and people don't want stories and character development. So the Transformers, Autobots and Decepticons alike, are more or less plot devices much like the first movie. They have no characters or really any significance to the plot to speak of besides looking cool with their rough, vomited metal looking designs to paraphrase Roger Ebert. Autobots and Decepticons show up and say a couple cliche one-liners, do something that people might think looks cool or pretty, and then disappear into the plot void much like Barricade in the first movie who said he was on his way to the final battle but never showed up. I get this is a spectacle. I get Bay really likes fast cars, big explosions, slow motion, animal sodomy, robot on human sodomy, depicting robot genitalia and bodily functions like farting and urination for no apparent reason, homophobia/homo-eroticism, oversexed hot babes and all of that. But is a tad bit of coherence a little too much to ask?

Take Mudflap and Skids. I'm not going to get into the the racism argument. But here was my main problem with Mudflap and Skids. They do not do anything. The human characters rarely speak with them or acknowledge their presence. Nothing Mudflap or Skids do is important or relevant to the story (besides one stupid, painfully forced action that reveals something). Mudflap and Skids basically could have been cut from the whole movie and the movie would be less horrible. hey aren't characters but just cookie-cutter characterizations, caricatures, call them what you like. Virtually none of the robots in this movie are actually characters. In old school Transformers you would get to know the bots and like them. Most of the stories revolved around the robots interacting. With Revenge of The Fallen you are still forced to watch the painfully unfunny adventures of Sam badly improvising through sub-par comedy bits that aren't fit to be on a sitcom. There's a scene that goes on forever where Sam's mom goes on a pot brownie bender through Sam's campus and tackles somebody. WHY? And that's what we have to deal with besides endless slow motion and explosions.

Action is action. I get that action movie fans will say this movie rocks and that it looks awesome, but I want to be invested in these characters and these battles. All the battles are so prolonged to a ridiculous level that you lose interest. Bay and his crew in their quest to perhaps raise bar simply go off the deep end. I think action and spectacle is fine, but it becomes a mess here. This goes beyond checking your brain at the door, eating your popcorn, and having fun. When you actually sit and take the movie in, the British reviewer that used the analogy of "like watching paint dry while getting hit in the head with a frying pan" makes perfect sense.

So at the end of the day, if you want the spectacle of Michael Bay, this movie definitely has it. But much like Shymalan, the spectacle and gimmick of Bay has worn thin and died.


The 411: There's a ton of action. There's lots of eye candy and Megan Fox. But that's it really. I mean Peter Cullen as Optimus Prime is cool and all, but you have the original series for that. If you want a really good storyline that involves Transformers you will seek out the Beast Wars saga because that is the best you will ever get out of storytelling for the Transformers brand. Also, why can Bumblebee not talk again? Seriously? I know these movies are stupid and contrived, but the throwaway explanation doesn't even make any sense nor is there any payoff.
 
Final Score:  5.0   [ Not So Good ]  legend


Post Comment (115)  |  Email Jeffrey Harris  |  View Jeffrey Harris's 411 Profile

  Send To Friend  |    Stumble It!  |    Digg It!  | 



Please add your comment below.
If you are registered, you can login and post under your registered name. If not, you can post as a guest or register.

* Please note that 411 moderates all comments. Your comment will show up on the site after it has been approved by an editor.
 
Name : 
Comment : 
Remaining Characters : 
2800
 

Comments (115)

 
Transformers = EPIC FAIL

Posted By: Buckets4Butters4Prez (Guest)  on June 23, 2009 at 11:08 PM

 
 
Optimus Prime cannot lace KENTA's boots.

Posted By: Jeffrey Harris (Guest)  on June 23, 2009 at 11:12 PM

 
 
Uh, so is this a review of the movie or a review of your hatred for Michael Bay cause you lost me in a couple parts.

Posted By: Guest#5969 (Guest)  on June 23, 2009 at 11:39 PM

 
 
Beast Wars was fucking awesome, I miss that show

Posted By: Drue Phoenix (Guest)  on June 23, 2009 at 11:50 PM

 
 
I can't trust this review at all, it comes off as nothing but snobby and very esoteric.

It's reviewed from a extreme messageboard nerd perspective that urgently seeking something to turn their nose up at, 'cuz turning your nose up is not an 'epic fail, right?

The reviewer shows he knows his transformers history but I think transformers were never ever about the characters. it's about robots fighting robots. sorry it's that simple.


Posted By: Kev Kellam (Guest)  on June 23, 2009 at 11:56 PM

 
 
so is the Fallen a full time villian or was this a one shot deal?

Posted By: JP (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 12:05 AM

 
 
Saw it last night in Seattle at a early preview. I got what I expected action, action, action.

Except all the SWEARING and Sexual Situations.

This movie in my opinion is a HARD PG-13 and would definately not take my kids to see this even at 13. No I am not a prude, but when you are marketing to children (HASBRO) and then you throw out what they did, yikes it made me cringe and I can tolerate a lot. In my opinion some of it was just for shock value. In my opinion I wouldn't take my son to it or have him watch it on DVD till 15.


Posted By: Rodimus PRIME (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 12:05 AM

 
 
so is the Fallen a full time villian or was this a one shot deal?

Posted By: JP (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 12:08 AM

 
 
to be fair, keep in mind that the same guy who gives Transformers a 5.0 gave Spiderman 3 an 8.5 so we really can't take his opinion seriously as his taste in movies is obviously terrible.

Posted By: JP (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 12:09 AM

 
 
Comedy bits not even fit for Yes, Dear? Damn.

Posted By: Guest#2531 (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 12:17 AM

 
 
Well, that's what happens when you completely rape the concept of the cartoon.

Posted By: Steve307 (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 12:22 AM

 
 
I'm shocked that this movie is 2 1/2 hours long. Seems WAY too long for a movie like this.

I'll laugh if this movie bombs after Bay bitched and moaned about Paramount's lack of a good marketing plan. I'm sure it will do huge at the Box Office though.

Outside of Star Trek it seems like we're having a pretty weak summer of movies.


Posted By: SU_RKO (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 12:45 AM

 
 
This review will get a lot of support from those with common sense, and a lot of hate from those with nothing better to do.

I agree with the supporters, and disagree with the haters. This review was spot on, and no, it was not "snobby".

F Bay for destroying this franchise.


Posted By: CanadianCrippler (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 01:18 AM

 
 
wow, I can't believe adults watch this crap. It's transformers. It's Michael Bay!! It's Shia (I ruined Indy) LeBeouf!! So HELL NO!!!

Posted By: Dr Phil (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 01:20 AM

 
 
Just seen the movie and would have to say that while some of the action scenes were pretty cool, the movie on a whole seemed to have a bit of emptyness about it. I was going to rate it 6 but because it had both Megan Fox and Isabel Lucas looking so so good i will give it an 8

Posted By: Blitz (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 01:23 AM

 
 
Is this the same Transformers that i watched or are you watching something else? Because the movie i watched was fucking EPIC!! It outdid the first movie by far. So much more action and Optimus didnt look like a pussy this time.

I recommend going to see it and would give it 9.5.


Posted By: NZ-Rep (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 01:29 AM

 
 
I've actually just finished hunting down the three seasons of Beast Wars on DVD, and man was it worth it. Very expensive, very awesome. This is what needs to be on the big screen. A live action Beast Wars. Lol

Posted By: Empire Of Ownage (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 01:35 AM

 
 
Transformers is a losers paradise and all the male veiwers only watch it for Megan Fox because they wish they could all get a girl like her and the female viewers only watch because their other half is making them watch it. Transformers sucks balls and everything about it does too. Now go back to your parents basements and cry yourselves to sleep over how pathetic your lives are and how Michael Bay has ruined another movie, not that he didn't do that with the first movie, or Bad Boys 2, Pearl Harbor, Armageddon, The Island, and any other thing that fool has touched. I would rather watch Terminator Salvation again then see this movie and that one sucked farts out of buffalos asses.

Posted By: Terminator Hater (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 01:39 AM

 
 
The first film was awful and it blows my mind when I express this opinion only to have people stare in amazement and tell me that I am weird because "everybody likes Transformers."

The excuse of "turn your brain off and enjoy the effects, its robots fighting robots, every movie is not an Academy Award Winner" does not fly. Star Trek showed a movie can be fast-paced, exciting, effects-filled and still be smart and not suck.

The second, by all accounts, is even worse.


Posted By: Guest#0286 (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 01:43 AM

 
 
OMG I love Transformers especially the part when Bumblebee peed on the guy and Optimus said, "Bumblebee, stop lubricating that man." HAHAHA

Best. Movie. Ever.


Posted By: Guest#7397 (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 01:44 AM

 
 
"Transformers were never ever about the characters. it's about robots fighting robots. sorry it's that simple"

THIS!

I'm so tired of people trying to take these movies so serious


Posted By: Guest#4957 (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 01:44 AM

 
 
its called an opinon you dumb fucks, if he hated it, he hated it

Posted By: etc (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 01:52 AM

 
 
The reviewer shows he knows his transformers history but I think transformers were never ever about the characters. it's about robots fighting robots. sorry it's that simple.

Posted By: Kev Kellam (Guest)
If it's about robots fighting why the fuck are the useless duo of Shia and Whoreface in the damn movie? Also good use of the word esoteric, not snobby at all you fucking idiot.


Posted By: paco smith (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 02:04 AM

 
 
from what i saw in the trailer...this movie looks like it would be a 5/10...this movie and G.I joe look like the same movie....looks like the screenwriters put all their original ideas into star trek

Posted By: tones (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 02:06 AM

 
 
* Miss March (6.0) = Crack is Whack!
* Tropic Thunder (9.5) = everybody can kiss my ass... This Movie Sucks!
* The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian (7.0) = Yeah! It felt like 7... hours of pure Booring shit!
* Shoot Em’ Up (8.0) = like it! but really! 1 point less than an Oscar contender... (TCCoBB)
* Spiderman 3 (8.5) = This movie keep's getting worse eveytime i see it! god damm nephew's
* Hot Fuzz (10.0) And I Quote "possibly the single greatest britsih comedy movie, of all time"... "Monty Python" any body?

Just saying! see it for what it is... A "Popcorn Mega Flick" = action + awesome FX + Entertaiment, you're looking for an Oscar, look somewhere else!...


Posted By: Fear_Inc (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 02:13 AM

 
 
If it's as good as the first one, then this rating is illogically high.

Posted By: Blanky (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 02:17 AM

 
 
How about you try to write a review sometime that doesn't give away the ENTIRE plot? I just want a review. Your opinion. Not a full on description of every twist and turn.

Posted By: lethargic (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 02:44 AM

 
 
beast wars ruined transformers

action = yep
decent storyline = yep
humor = yep
kept me watching = yep

thats all i wanted from the movie, if i wanted an oscar winning movie i would have saved my money


Posted By: lolwut (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 03:20 AM

 
 
this review is spot on.. and im a diehard TF fan

Posted By: Guest#3728 (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 04:45 AM

 
 
Transformers were never ever about the characters. it's about robots fighting robots. sorry it's that simple

Let me guess you either A) didnt get a chance to enjoy the characters as a kid because your mom was raping you or B)you're so mature you can't admit to liking a kids toy only the more adult movie version which has dogs fucking and robots pissing.
Please dont be witty and attempt a C, there is none.


Posted By: KevKellamisShit (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 04:50 AM

 
 
I give it 7/10.

The negatives first:

1) The first films plot was relatively simple to follow, this movie was wayyy too complex for a mindless action genre.

2) It was about 30 minutes to long.. boy did it drag in parts

3) It was near impossible to differentiate between the decepticons and autobots... when they were fighting I had no idea who to cheer because all the robots looked pretty damn similar.

Positive:

1) The cheesy humour... it made me smile.
2) The action sequences.. though I was confused too who the hell was who most the time boy was it spectacular.
3) Starscream/Megatron relationship - finally got some screentime for me that was always the best thing about the original.

For me not as fun as the first film, but still a blast. My advise turn your brain off and just enjoy.


Posted By: Andrew Barbarash (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 04:55 AM

 
 
John Campia also gave this film 5/10.

Posted By: Guest#0409 (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 05:21 AM

 
 
Reviews Counted: 109
Fresh: 24 Rotten:85
Average Rating: 4/10


Posted By: 22% @ ROTTEN TOMATOES (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 05:25 AM

 
 
I personally enjoyed thne flick but i can understand the poor reviews from some folk. i respect the reviewers right to his opinion but have to ask was the 8.5 for Spider Man3 out of 100? That was terrible. Go watch Spider Man 3 before watching the new Transformers flick. You'll enjoy anything after that rare Sam Raimi misfire

Posted By: Flyin' Bryan (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 05:25 AM

 
 
sexual material??!?!?

I'm not going to see this.....i'll stick to the DVD of the old cartoon. I hope they don't rape Battle of the Planets this badly.


Posted By: jay (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 06:39 AM

 
 
Explosions + Megan Fox + Giant Robots + Directed by Michael Bay = AWESOME!!

The only thing from the original that would've made it more awesome would be if Stan Bush was on the soundtrack!

No one's impressed with all the "Waahhh! My childhood memories are getting destroyed..Michael Bay is the Devil...Bumblebee got raped..etc., etc." comments.

You can't take a movie like this too seriously!!


Posted By: Regular Dude (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 07:00 AM

 
 
Except all the SWEARING and Sexual Situations.

This movie in my opinion is a HARD PG-13 and would definately not take my kids to see this even at 13. No I am not a prude, but when you are marketing to children (HASBRO) and then you throw out what they did, yikes it made me cringe and I can tolerate a lot. In my opinion some of it was just for shock value. In my opinion I wouldn't take my son to it or have him watch it on DVD till 15.

Posted By: Rodimus PRIME (Guest) on June 24, 2009 at 12:05 AM

Hi Rodimus,

I posted a similar comment after watching a short clip on this website of Wheelie calling Megan Fox a "crazy bitch." My thoughts were that there were going to be several parents pissed off that a movie that was essentially a kids movie featured such vulgarly used language. I was subsequently told to "grow up." I too am not a prude, but I'm glad to see that someone else made the same observation. The problem isn't the sex, drugs or swearing, it is that a huge chunk of the audience (parents and kids) are expecting a live action movie of a cartoon, not a one "fuck" or drug reference short of an "R" rating movie.


Posted By: John (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 08:40 AM

 
 
They should have just called Mudflap & Skids Car Car Binks and gotten it over with. Mindless action is fine, but there's no need for the inclusion of stuff that is absurd to even a 10 year old, like Car Car & Devastator's massive balls.

Posted By: tcraven (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 09:19 AM

 
 
Wait... Isabel Lucas as Alice, and she is a decepticon? What? They have cyborg Decepticons now?

Posted By: Todd Vote (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 09:24 AM

 
 
Do you know what a review is? Why do you give away so much of the story? Whatever little story there was, but still. That is not how a review is done.

Posted By: Atreus (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 09:35 AM

 
 
This review == FAIL

Posted By: Wowzers (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 10:03 AM

 
 
Atreus: there is nothing that says a review does not discuss the plot, in fact I'd expect a film review to discuss the goddamn plot. If you're so worried about spoilers, go see the bloody film.

Anyway, the anti-elitist attitude of some people ("Transformers is, always was, and always will be about giant robots fighting") is very silly and hypocritical. So action movies aren't ALLOWED to have coherent plots and be philosophical? Terminator and T2 seemed to do just fine in that regard.

Transformers fans are pissed about Bayformers because contrary to the beliefs of fans who only watched the 80's cartoon, there's tons of mythology and characterization in the Transformers mythos. The G1/G2 comics, Beast Wars and Animated all have nuanced and interesting characters, mature storylines, grand story arcs, and don't treat the audience like blithering idiots.

It amazes me that despite having the highest rating of any Transformers fiction, Bayformers is somehow the most immature version of the universe. Why anyone thought it was a good idea to include defecation, drug abuse, masturbation, animal rutting and swearing for comic effect in what's supposed to be a franchise selling toys to kids, mystifies me.

Anyone whining about TF fans disliking it for "aspiring to something it's not", are likely just the same folk whose last experience was the first animated film, oblivious to the complexities and cleverness of the rest of the fiction. There's more to Transformers than a cheesy 80's cartoon.


Posted By: The Tortoise King (Registered)  on June 24, 2009 at 10:09 AM

 
 
OMG I love Transformers especially the part when Bumblebee peed on the guy and Optimus said, "Bumblebee, stop lubricating that man." HAHAHA

Best. Movie. Ever.

Posted By: Guest#7397 (Guest) on June 24, 2009 at 01:44 AM

Really?!? Cause that's the part I puked in disgust!


Posted By: Guest#2663 (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 10:45 AM

 
 
Do the Aerialbots make an appearance?? I saw the Superion toy at Target last night, but didn't think they were in the flick.

Posted By: Joe (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 10:59 AM

 
 
At least we still have the vastly superior Transformers animated movie.

You know the one that doesnt suck and has Lion doing the themesong?


Posted By: son of pillman (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 11:01 AM

 
 
They only masturbating that should be done in a Bay Film is by me if Bay is filmed being burned to death by one of his hundreds explosions.

Posted By: Guest#1398 (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 11:02 AM

 
 
Try to cram all the mythos into one or even two films will not work either. You'll get rushed story lines. The reason Beast Wars, etc have such grand arcs and character development is that they had alot more time to do those things. You just can't fit everything into a 2 hour movie.
You may also turn off a large portion of viewers who don't care about Beast Wars, etc.


Posted By: Joe (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 11:04 AM

 
 
They only masturbating that should be done in a Bay Film is by me if Bay is filmed being burned to death by one of his hundreds explosions.

Posted By: Guest#1398 (Guest) on June 24, 2009 at 11:02 AM

Amen.


Posted By: Guest#4973 (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 12:05 PM

 
 
So what the hell happened to Barricade??? Did his car brake down going to the final battle in Trans 1? I guess that's what happens when you transform to an American made car.

Posted By: Atreus (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 12:12 PM

 
 
This movie stunk so bad, they should wave a skunk in front of Michael Bay's face. I felt raped of 2 1/2 hours of my life. The direction was horrible. Shia's acting just keeps getting worse. It seemed the only people in the theater were the losers that wished Megan Fox was their wife/girlfriend or die hard Transformers fans. Quite possibly the worst film since Terminator Salvation. This might take the MTV movie award, but who really cares about that piece of garbage, other than your teenie boppers and little kids that cannot tell their ass from a hole in the ground. Best advice is to watch this film online for free, even if the quality sucks, because what the hell the movie sucks anyways, so who cares. Also, by watching it online you can skip all the lame boring parts and just see what you want to. Why pay to see this piece of "Hollywood" TRASH. Michael Bay, Megan Fox, Shia LaBeouf all suck and they should die in one of Michael Bay's explosions. Maybe since Michael is leaving the series he can take Shia with him and they can recast and reboot this craptastic franchise. Since this film was as horrible as it was, I am afraid to even see G.I. Joe, that looked just as bad. Two Giant Thumbs down for this film. I would rather of had the Jackass crew kick me in the balls repeatedly until there was nothing left then ever see this movie. Stay away from this movie, far away. By the way, the animated movie rocked because all the main characters died, the only part that blew was that the kid and dad didn't die in the movie as well. Back on to Revenge of the Fallen, horrible movie that I hope bombs like Waterworld and Terminator Salvation. Your best to find another movie this weekend then waste your time on this. Get as far away from this movie as possible, or atleast try to watch it online for free and save your cash.

Posted By: Ron Germany (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 12:20 PM

 
 
The comment about liking the part with Bumblebee peeing was a joke. Sarcasm.

Transformers is insipid. I can at least sit through Spider-man 3.


Posted By: Guest#4959 (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 12:33 PM

 
 
Never have seen anything "Transformers" related outside of the first film, and it bored me. If you are going to have a movie that's all about stuff blowing up, it can't be two and a half hours long. You're making a movie that's catering to short attention spans and then making them sit for that long? And trying to add all this sitcom wannabe stuff to boot?

And Megan Fox is not hot. She looks good in pictures, but when she's not in just one still frame she is so void of any character or personality it makes her look like a living mannequin. If you're going to fap to her, you may as well go jack it in the ladies' department at JCPenney.


Posted By: Harry and Marv (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 12:35 PM

 
 
I give it 7/10.

The negatives first:

1) The first films plot was relatively simple to follow, this movie was wayyy too complex for a mindless action genre.

2) It was about 30 minutes to long.. boy did it drag in parts

3) It was near impossible to differentiate between the decepticons and autobots... when they were fighting I had no idea who to cheer because all the robots looked pretty damn similar.

Positive:

1) The cheesy humour... it made me smile.
2) The action sequences.. though I was confused too who the hell was who most the time boy was it spectacular.
3) Starscream/Megatron relationship - finally got some screentime for me that was always the best thing about the original.

For me not as fun as the first film, but still a blast. My advise turn your brain off and just enjoy.

Posted By: Andrew Barbarash (Guest) on June 24, 2009 at 04:55 AM

Dead on!! I couldn't tell who was who during the fight and what a way to use Devestator!! Come on, they could have done better.


Posted By: D3lions (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 12:42 PM

 
 
"Well, that's what happens when you completely rape the concept of the cartoon."

To be fair, the kiddie toys came first.


Posted By: Darth Mortis (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 12:52 PM

 
 
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen = EPIC FAIL.

Anything Transformers related other then the old cartoon and animated movie = EPIC FAIL

Got it? Good. Deal with it.


Posted By: Buckets4Butters4Prez (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 12:53 PM

 
 
Was dragged to a midnight showing when I had to work in the morning. God did it drag. And every action scene was soooooooo sloooooooowwww. Yes, Bay, you can film in slow motion. We get it.

Hated the first one and this one was exactly what I thought it would be.

And half the theatre APPLAUDED when the movie ended. Applauded.


Posted By: neverAcquiesce (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 01:04 PM

 
 
were you reviewing the first transformers? because the second one was good!
i dont care who directs a movie. as long as its good, i couldnt care if a guy with no arms or legs directed it.
im gonna say the same thing about megan fox as i did with angelina jolie: she is not that hot!
Shia LeBeouf is a faggot, tom kenny is one of the worlds best voice actors, beast wars was great, and jet prime was the shit!


Posted By: Guest#5983 (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 01:07 PM

 
 
The first one sucked, so I guess this carries on tradition.

Posted By: Foolio (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 01:47 PM

 
 
Did anyone bother to read the Transformers "Rise of Starscream" Comics?
It explains everything that happened between the movies. You freaks read every Star Trek or Star Wars tweener book but you ignore the comic series that catches you up on everything that happened from when Starscream flew away into space in the first film up until the start of the second film. Lazy asses!


Posted By: SHUT UP HATERS (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 02:12 PM

 
 
I saw a midnight showing. My entire theater, and it's a large theater, stood up and applauded the movie. I enjoyed it. I never once felt bored. I got exactly what I expected, nothing more or less. Who the hell goes to a Michael Bay movie and expects something other than cheesy dialog, Baysplosions, and hot women?

I thought the Twins were on the same level as horrible as Jar-Jar and I'm not a fan of the piss and fart jokes.

As to the folks saying "I'm not a prude but"...yes you are in fact a prude. They don't drop the F bomb...there's no nudity. I'm pretty sure you're more likely to hear the F bomb on "Jon and Kate". Maybe I just relish the fact it was Spongebob calling Fox a "dirty bitch" :)


Posted By: Johnny Israel (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 02:22 PM

 
 
God i am so sick of reading comments that cry about how their childhood has been destroyed and how Michael Bay should die. Sounds like a bunch of immature haters and babies.

Posted By: jonah (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 02:23 PM

 
 
I had anal sex with Hillary Clinton while George W. Bush baked strudel and Dennis Rodman played with a Tea Cup.

Posted By: butt cheddar (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 02:42 PM

 
 
Was dragged to a midnight showing when I had to work in the morning. God did it drag. And every action scene was soooooooo sloooooooowwww. Yes, Bay, you can film in slow motion. We get it.

Hated the first one and this one was exactly what I thought it would be.

And half the theatre APPLAUDED when the movie ended. Applauded.

Posted By: neverAcquiesce (Guest) on June 24, 2009 at 01:04 PM

They applauded because they were glad it was over, not because it was good. Get your facts right. Quite possible one of the years worst films, might do well in the box office, but that is because there are just as many Transformanites as there are trekkies and star wars followers. Now go cry yourself to sleep and go to sleep thinking it was wonderful, because living in denial is great...


Posted By: Transformers Hater (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 02:48 PM

 
 
God i am so sick of reading comments that cry about how their childhood has been destroyed and how Michael Bay should die. Sounds like a bunch of immature haters and babies.

Posted By: jonah (Guest) on June 24, 2009 at 02:23 PM

I'm sick of hearing people like you praise horrible acting and shitty directing. Just admit you only like it because its Transformers and everything Transformers is cool in your opinion and we will movie on. The fact of the matter is this movie sucked donkey balls, much like anything Shia LaBeouf is in or Michael Bay directs. Its not that I hate the movie because of them alone, its just the movie was over long and it seemed like it would have been a better direct to DVD movie, but whatever thats my opinion, now if you want to flame me for it fine, it just proves your either 1) a communist, 2) a facist, or 3) don't get me started again.


Posted By: Transformers4Transgenders (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 02:53 PM

 
 
This movie made me want to go home and watch the Pirates porno flick, atleast that made me cum buckets.

Posted By: HARD FAT DICK (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 02:55 PM

 
 
This film make me want to watch more direct to DVD movies, did anyone know They made the porno Pirates a DVD rated R version? That film made me cum buckets, Transformers should have been called Transgenders: More Than Meets the Eye... Wait, I think that already is a movie.

Posted By: Bunkhouse Buckets (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 02:59 PM

 
 
Cause Peal Harbor sucked and Michael Bay does too.

Posted By: Team America (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 03:04 PM

 
 
jonah: I'm sick of people who whine about whiners, personally. Somewhat hypocritical, I'd say.

Michael Bay is a big boy, he's not off to his room crying like a little girl because the big bad TF fanboys are angry about him pissing about with their franchise.


Posted By: The Tortoise King (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 03:13 PM

 
 
this is better than others ive read.

Puts the tampa film examiner to shame.

makes ebert look foolish.

all people on MSN missed it too.

good stuff


Posted By: Guest#5419 (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 03:18 PM

 
 
I saw the midnight showing of this movie last night. It was excellent. I suppose they may have left out some parts or whatever but overall, it was a great movie. They do drop the F-Bomb by the way (Wheelie says it) but only once. I give it at least a 9/10.

Posted By: lawlzalion (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 03:20 PM

 
 
Do you "I don't care if it's good, I just like explosions and stuff" people apply that same logic to your other interests. If you go get music, do you go choose a terrible pop artist with questionable singing talent just because that person is attractive, and hell, it's just a ridiculously overplayed pop song, gosh-darnit, it's not supposed to be that good anyway?

When you go out to eat, do you go to restaurants with really cool decor, but terrible service and food?

Would you buy a car with a faulty transmission, shredded interior, broken rods, and no fluid, but with an AWESOME paintjob?

There is ABSOLUTELY NO REASON why any film that has a budget the size of any summer blockbuster should have bad elements. If even 10 percent of the budget when into screenwriting, I'm sure the film would be amazing.

You are being sold a shit sandwich, and you are asking for more. Then you DEFEND the studios that sold you the shit sandwich in the first place!

Movies with great plots are better than ones with weak plots. Does anyone disagree? Movies with great characters are better than ones with weak characters. Wouldn't you prefer to see a film with hot chicks, explosions, and tons of action, but ALSO with a great plot and really great characters?

I mean, wouldn't you rather see Raiders of the Lost Ark than Bad Boys 2?

Otherwise, why not just get a recording of awesome things exploding awesomely intercut with fine ass chicks being sultry and quit going to the movies altogether?


Posted By: xjuggernaughtx (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 04:36 PM

 
 
Movie Rating 8/10
Troll & Reviewer Rating INFINITE FAIL


Posted By: Guest#7401 (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 05:11 PM

 
 
So what the hell happened to Barricade??? Did his car brake down going to the final battle in Trans 1? I guess that's what happens when you transform to an American made car.

Posted By: Atreus (Guest) on June 24, 2009 at 12:12 PM

ya know that's a damn good question....


Posted By: da juice (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 05:13 PM

 
 
Give me a break 411 has been foaming at the mouth for this to come out just so the hundred reviews we will get could bash the movie. And you gotta love all the loser fanboys coming out of nowhere to bash it too when the assholes probably didn't even see it.

Posted By: JM (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 05:23 PM

 
 
actually there are several prequel comics out that explain a lot of events that happen between the 2 movies (ie: bumblebee's voice, starscreams' rule, the human/autobot alliance, and much more.....

Posted By: Guest#2555 (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 05:53 PM

 
 
I saw the movie yesterday. Honestly, if you are looking for a master piece then you will sadly be disappointed. If you go into the movie hopping to be entertained, see the best CG effects to date in any movie and watch shit blow up! Then this is the movie for you. It's is a Micheal Bay film, if nothing else you know what you are getting with him. I only have one minor issue with the film, and that is its running time, maybe 20 mins less.

Posted By: Dano55 (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 06:01 PM

 
 
I hate the logic of "turn your brain off." You dont have to choose between a "fun" movie of horrible quality and an "Academy Award winning cerebral film with great acting, direction, etc."

The Dark Knight, Iron Man, Star Trek have shown us that a film can be good and entertaining and effects-filled. One need not be sacrificed for the other. Transformers sucks. Deal with it.


Posted By: Guest#2297 (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 06:49 PM

 
 
actually there are several prequel comics out that explain a lot of events that happen between the 2 movies (ie: bumblebee's voice, starscreams' rule, the human/autobot alliance, and much more.....

Posted By: Guest#2555 (Guest) on June 24, 2009 at 05:53 PM

Here's the thing though. You shouldn't have to read some comics just to make the movie make sense. A movie should make sense on its own accord, without needing to read x amount of graphic novels or whatever to be up to speed on things. I havent seen this movie yet, so I can't comment if this is true or not in the case of this film though.


Posted By: Guest#8549 (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 07:11 PM

 
 
"Take Mudflap and Skids. I'm not going to get into the the racism argument."

Because THERE IS NO ARGUEMENT! The only people that are crying about racism in this movie are sissy white people who still go around apologizing for slavery.


Posted By: Guest#3795 (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 07:20 PM

 
 
Ummmmmm,Tortoise King if you consider me a whiner then you are doing the exact same thing you critizized me for. Hmmmmmmmmmmm sounds kinda hypocritical i'd say,don't you think so?

Posted By: jonah (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 07:58 PM

 
 
This movie was worse than watching wrestling.

Posted By: Captain Patterson (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 08:39 PM

 
 
Michael Bay has ruined everything that was good.Transformers , friday the 13th,The Texas Chainsaw Massacre and on and on.

Posted By: uglyhead (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 09:13 PM

 
 
I took my nine-year-old daughter to see this today, and that effected my enjoyment of the movie somewhat, I think. Let me start by saying that I've been a Transformers fan since I was a kid, I've seen most of the various series, read a lot of the comics, and I saw the first movie (and enjoyed it, I might add).

Now, as for the sequel, I've been eagerly anticipating it, and I went in with high hopes. Coming out of the theater, I was struck by two things - the amount of profanity in the movie, and the depth of the storyline when compared with the first movie. I had no idea, especially after watching the first movie, that there would be so much profanity. Personally, I don't have a problem with it, or with letting my daughter hear it, because I've taught her that people who use profanity usually don't have anything worthwhile to say (are you listening, 411 commenters?). That said, I can see why some of the other families in the theater may have had a problem with it, as they brought much younger children to the movie. As for Mudflap and Skids, my daughter and I were laughing at their antics throughout most of the movie, although I will agree that they served no point outside of comic relief. To those complaining that they're racist, why is it okay for Chappelle to have content similar to that (the Pixies segment from the Lost Episodes comes immediately to mind), but not for this movie? Aren't you being racist as well, by saying one person can use stereotypes for humor and another can't?

In terms of characters, while there was nothing comparable to Iron Man or Dark Knight, the characters who were featured did display more depth than, say, the kids in the Friday the 13th remake (another film I enjoyed, and which seemed to garner much better reviews than Transformers). Whether it was Sam's dad's unwillingness to admit how much he really cares about his son, or Sam and Mikela's unwillingness to be the first to say I love you, or the very human emotions Bumblebee displayed towards Sam, I never felt like (aside from Leo's sidekicks) I was watching a tableau of stereotypes playing out (a la the aforementioned Friday the 13th remake). And while some of the humor was certainly targeted towards the lowest common denominator, I was really only uncomfortable with my daughter asking me what a "scrotum" was. The dogs humping and leg humping are something my daughter can see watching Animal Planet, and Jetfire farting out a parachute actually made me chuckle.

This movie certainly wasn't up to the standards of last summer's geek movies (Iron Man and The Dark Knight and even the Incredible Hulk kinda ruined that), but it wasn't nearly as bad as most people would have you believe. The storyline was not unlike the original animated movie...


Posted By: Wyatt Beougher (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 09:49 PM

 
 
...and looking over and seeing my daughter crying when Prime was laid low made me realize that there was some kind of connection there, being as my daughter's exposure to the Transformers universe was some Beast Wars when she was very young and the first Bay movie. And while Shia LeBeouf didn't turn in a performance up to the lofty standards set by Heath Ledger, watching his facial ticks and the rapid mental breakdown he went through was humorous, and the "You say it first" thing with Megan Fox reminded me of my first serious girlfriend.

Basically, I'm somewhere in the middle - I'm not going to vilify this movie for not being on the level of the Dark Knight (which I hate to keep referencing, but it basically set the bar for comic book/cartoon adaptations), but I'm not going to put it out there as something I was completely satisfied with. I did enjoy it, very much, but there was certainly room for improvement. If I had to compare it to another genre film like this, I'd actually compare it to Spider-Man 3, in that it tried to do way too much and suffered as a result, but it was still a lot better than that film was. In terms of sheer enjoyment, I'd probably put it on the same level as last summer's Incredible Hulk - tremendous premise, somewhat lacking execution, but still a fun film that will leave your inner child mostly satisfied when you walk out of the theater.

In a related (and somewhat unfair) tidbit, I walked out of the theater and into a trap - the local Catholic primary school is raffling off a 2010 Camaro SS with the Bumblebee paint job, so, riding the enjoyment wave of the movie, I dropped $50 on three raffle tickets.


Posted By: Wyatt Beougher (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 09:57 PM

 
 
I can't understand why people don't like the plot. I think it makes perfect sense that they would be after energon as they did it in the cartoon. In the first movie people bitched about the movie being too much about the humans and not enough about the robots. Now that we have robots glower people can handle it. All I want is mindless robot action with bits and pieces of dialog from the original cartoon. Like Megaton and Starscream fighting. They even got Jetfire right as in the original cartoon he did defect from the decepticons and he was also old and rusted.

You people can bitch about Bay all you want but I think he and his crew did a good job and stayed true to the source material. That's more then what I can say about deadpool at the end of Wolverine.


Posted By: Prime (Guest)  on June 24, 2009 at 11:46 PM

 
 
Out of this review and all of these comments i did not read one good reason why this is a bad film, i loved it, 10x better than the first, pacing was fine, jokes were great, and good to see john tuturro not take himself so seriously, the twins were awesome, devastator kicked ass, optimus kicked ass like he should, there was only a couple things i didn't like but it did not ruin the film at all and yes i clapped my hands at the end, also can't wait for G I Joe

Posted By: Juice (Guest)  on June 25, 2009 at 12:04 AM

 
 
Out of this review and all of these comments i did not read one good reason why this is a bad film, i loved it, 10x better than the first, pacing was fine, jokes were great, and good to see john tuturro not take himself so seriously, the twins were awesome, devastator kicked ass, optimus kicked ass like he should, there was only a couple things i didn't like but it did not ruin the film at all and yes i clapped my hands at the end, also can't wait for G I Joe

Juice I agree with you and I don't even expect G I Joe to be that good but I will see it regardless.


Posted By: Prime (Guest)  on June 25, 2009 at 01:00 AM

 
 
you're review nailed it. Every scene with the human characters interacting was just bad cheesy comedy. this movie was very disappointing.
Bumblebee not being able to talk again was unacceptable. What's so wrong with making the actual transformers the characters?


Posted By: furey (Guest)  on June 25, 2009 at 01:36 AM

 
 
this movie fuckn ruled..jus action packd from the 1st minute..way better than the 1st

Posted By: Guest#4208 (Guest)  on June 25, 2009 at 02:44 AM

 
 
"To those complaining that they're racist, why is it okay for Chappelle to have content similar to that (the Pixies segment from the Lost Episodes comes immediately to mind), but not for this movie? Aren't you being racist as well, by saying one person can use stereotypes for humor and another can't?"

You're comparing an edgy, cable TV show to a movie that's being marketed to a younger audience? That's about on par with you saying that it would be okay for Transformers to have a steamy sex scene because something you saw at 3 a.m. on Cinemax was similar.


Posted By: Apples and Oranges (Guest)  on June 25, 2009 at 10:19 AM

 
 
First, any true fan knows that Beast Wars was the true raping of the franchise. Dumbest idea ever. Second, this movie served its purpose...robots beating the crap out of robots.
There was a plot. It was a good one. There was some character development, but with all the robots you couldn't get to them all.
I respect your opinion...if you didn't like the movie, thats fine. But please don't tell me I'm an idiot for thinking it was fantastic. Can't wait till the DVD comes out.


Posted By: bobbalou24 (Guest)  on June 25, 2009 at 11:23 AM

 
 
I Really Enjoyed This Movie. Jeff Harris Seams To Have A Hard On For Hating Michael Bay, I Could Not Care Less For Him, If Someone Makes A Movie I Want To See, I Will See It, Reguardless Of What The Critics Say About It, They Are Usually Full Of Themselves Anyways.

Pros
Optimus Was More Of A Bad Ass And Bee Was Showing To Be Stronger Than Any Of The Original G1 Cartoons.

Cons
Seamed Like There Were Several Megatron Clones That Were Fighting Instead Of Having Different Robots.
Story Was Slow At Some Times.

If You Liked The 1st One Then See This Film.

(Also Jeff If You Were Paying Attention To The Movie, Bee Was In The Garage At Sams House, Not Running Around With The Other Autobots, So When His Vocals Went Out, No One Was There To Repair It, Sam Mentioned This In The Movie)

To The Replyers,
Yes I Loved The Transformers Cartoon, But Only Till OP Was Brought Back To Life. Did Not Care For Beast Wars, Or Anything Following, Tried To Watch Them, But It Just Did Not Work For Me.


Posted By: Jake (Guest)  on June 25, 2009 at 11:41 AM

 
 
I saw this last night and I loved it and so did the crowd. Still don't get the hate. Just bring on the Dinobots for the third movie!

Posted By: The Great Capt. Smooth (Guest)  on June 25, 2009 at 12:47 PM

 
 
Transformers sucked and everone knows it but the fanboys.

Posted By: Transformers...Hated It (Guest)  on June 25, 2009 at 12:51 PM

 
 
Transformers, honest opinion I really did not like it. Didn't care for the first film either. To everyone out there, if you did not like the first film, you won't like the sequel, so stay away, far away.

Posted By: Honest Opinion (Guest)  on June 25, 2009 at 01:07 PM

 
 
"First, any true fan knows that Beast Wars was the true raping of the franchise. Dumbest idea ever. Second, this movie served its purpose...robots beating the crap out of robots.
There was a plot. It was a good one. There was some character development, but with all the robots you couldn't get to them all.
I respect your opinion...if you didn't like the movie, thats fine. But please don't tell me I'm an idiot for thinking it was fantastic. Can't wait till the DVD comes out.

Posted By: bobbalou24 (Guest) on June 25, 2009 at 11:23 AM"

Oh fuck you, Beast Wars was brilliant.

Than again, you enjoyed this movie so I doubt your opinion counts for much either way.


Posted By: Jesus (Guest)  on June 25, 2009 at 03:11 PM

 
 
I find it funny how people complain about the swearing even though they probably heard their parents say much worse when they were younger. Who cares if children hear some grown up words, they should already know from their parents not to say them

Posted By: Jones (Guest)  on June 25, 2009 at 03:42 PM

 
 
"Except all the SWEARING and Sexual Situations.

This movie in my opinion is a HARD PG-13 and would definately not take my kids to see this even at 13. No I am not a prude, but when you are marketing to children (HASBRO) and then you throw out what they did, yikes it made me cringe and I can tolerate a lot. In my opinion some of it was just for shock value. In my opinion I wouldn't take my son to it or have him watch it on DVD till 15.

Posted By: Rodimus PRIME "

EXACTLY! What the hell, I took my 5yr old & 11yr old last night and was pretty shocked at all of it.

I realize swearing & sexual content is in pretty much every thing these days, but come on. Dark Knight didn't curse a lot, yet Paul Blart did & it was PG! I don't remember all of this going in the first Transformers movie. I think there was a few swears in Wolverine, etc.

All of my 11yr olds favorite parts were the swearing & humping parts... Come on man.

"I like when the green robot almost said Mother F"

Really??? What about the bad ass robot that just was formed off of the other construction vehicles???

I thought it was a great action movie with good comedy mixed in & well worth the $. Good stuff, I just don't get why the excessive cursing needed to be done. Bad enough to showcase marijuana brownies as something that makes you act funny...


Posted By: Byzdalmyt (Guest)  on June 25, 2009 at 06:06 PM

 
 
Watching too closely I noticed that The Constructicons, who combined to form devastator, were also fighting the NEST soldiers during the finale. I know it was juvenile but I enjoyed the Scrotum scene

Posted By: big kid (Guest)  on June 26, 2009 at 04:15 AM

 
 
worst.movie.ever

Posted By: bimbi887 (Guest)  on June 26, 2009 at 05:08 AM

 
 
eff this review and everyone who agrees with it. this movie was fucking sick.

Posted By: Guest#6457 (Guest)  on June 26, 2009 at 06:35 AM

 
 
eff this review and everyone who agrees with it. this movie was fucking sick.

Posted By: Guest#6457 (Guest) on June 26, 2009 at 06:35 AM

Eff you too, this movies sucks worse than Jeff Foxworthy on crank.


Posted By: Weedface (Guest)  on June 26, 2009 at 11:37 AM

 
 
this movie is about cars that turn into robots... & everyone is freaking out!! It's Cars that turn into robots! bunch of weirdos.

Posted By: Guest#6969 (Guest)  on June 26, 2009 at 12:36 PM

 
 
someone mentioned that transformers is about robots fighting robots. EXACTLY. Which is why this movie is fucking trash. It was all about some lame people and the military. the military blew up most of the damn transformers in the end anyway. this review was spot on. this movie should be called SHIA LEBOUEROIUEOUF, MEGAN FOX AND THE U.S. MILITARY (featuring some robot things)

Posted By: Guest#6972 (Guest)  on June 27, 2009 at 02:21 AM

 
 
This movie is way too overrated to even by this writer's standard. Saw it last night and wish I stayed home. I wish they would recast and reboot this. It just seems like the logo and name slapped on it will make anyone go see it. You can dress a pig up in a dress, but under the dress you will still have a pig.

Posted By: Average Joe (Guest)  on June 27, 2009 at 01:08 PM

 
 
This movie was terrible. And fuck Beast Wars. It really doesn't hold up. Its like watching cutscenes from a terrible PSX game.

Posted By: Guest#1075 (Guest)  on June 27, 2009 at 10:57 PM

 
 
This movie is way too overrated to even by this writer's standard. Saw it last night and wish I stayed home. I wish they would recast and reboot this. It just seems like the logo and name slapped on it will make anyone go see it. You can dress a pig up in a dress, but under the dress you will still have a pig.

Posted By: Average Joe (Guest) on June 27, 2009 at 01:08 PM

Don't get me wrong, I would still bang the pig in the dress so I guess Transformers 2 isn't THAT bad.


Posted By: Average Joe (Guest)  on June 27, 2009 at 11:20 PM

 
 
The first transformers was awesome with enough action and breaks. Transformers 2 was pretty good yet there was so much action that it got boring and had no more point. This movie should still get a better rating.

Posted By: Guest#5057 (Guest)  on June 28, 2009 at 07:27 AM

 
 
This movie is way too overrated to even by this writer's standard. Saw it last night and wish I stayed home. I wish they would recast and reboot this. It just seems like the logo and name slapped on it will make anyone go see it. You can dress a pig up in a dress, but under the dress you will still have a pig.

Posted By: Average Joe (Guest) on June 27, 2009 at 01:08 PM

Don't get me wrong, I would still bang the pig in the dress so I guess Transformers 2 isn't THAT bad.

Posted By: Average Joe (Guest) on June 27, 2009 at 11:20 PM

Internet trolls back at it again. Flame a guy for speaking his opinion. Real cool. Its obvious who typed the last part has problems. Why bash a guy for saying the movies sucked? It did, didn't? I thought it did. One of the years worst film since Terminator Salvation.


Posted By: Global Gym (Guest)  on June 28, 2009 at 11:12 AM

 
 
be quiet, Global Gym... worst movie since Terminator Salvation?? GOSH! that was 3 weeks ago, wasn't it?

I liked Transformers so don't state it as fact that it was bad. Screw the mythology, It was cars, robots & a hot girl, broke a bunch of records and is a good popcorn flick. Get over yourselves. Plus you blast a troll for crackin a joke and then troll yourself by hurling insults... nice.


Posted By: bolo (Guest)  on June 28, 2009 at 05:36 PM

 
 
be quiet, Global Gym... worst movie since Terminator Salvation?? GOSH! that was 3 weeks ago, wasn't it?

I liked Transformers so don't state it as fact that it was bad. Screw the mythology, It was cars, robots & a hot girl, broke a bunch of records and is a good popcorn flick. Get over yourselves. Plus you blast a troll for crackin a joke and then troll yourself by hurling insults... nice.

Posted By: bolo (Guest) on June 28, 2009 at 05:36 PM

By the way I'm Gay and love horrible movies like Transformers 2.


Posted By: bolo (Guest)  on June 29, 2009 at 01:13 AM

 
 
my boyfriend, Global Gym, didn't like it though.

Posted By: bolo (Guest)  on June 29, 2009 at 10:44 PM

 
 
This movie had more holes than swiss cheese. Awful movie. Horrible at best.

Posted By: AVC (Guest)  on July 01, 2009 at 12:19 PM

 
 
I took my 7 year old to a PG-13 movie and was SHOCKED by the language!

I dunno...I kidna htink the RATING might give it away, especially sicne the rating will tell you exactly why its rated that way.....and what does Transformers 2's ratign say?

Rated PG-13 for intense sequences of sci-fi action violence, language, some crude and sexual material, and brief drug material.

Oh look...the "shocking" stuff in the movie was THERE FOR YOU TO SEE THE ENTIRE TIME.


Posted By: AdamS (Guest)  on July 03, 2009 at 02:38 AM

 
 
It's "Shyamalan". I'm just saying. Pretty accurate review though.

Posted By: Don (Guest)  on July 14, 2009 at 11:25 AM

 


www.41mania.com
Copyright © 2005 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.