Surrogates Review
Posted by Joseph Lee on 09.28.2009
This is what happens when you allow the Internet to evolve.
Starring:
*Bruce Willis as Agent Tom Greer
*Radha Mitchell as Agent Peters
*Rosamund Pike as Maggie Greer
*Ving Rhames as The Prophet
*Boris Kodjoe as Andrew Stone
*Jack Noseworthy as Miles Strickland
*James Cromwell as Dr. Lionel Canter
Story: Set in a futuristic world where humans live in isolation and interact through surrogate robots, a cop is forced to leave his home for the first time in years in order to investigate the murders of others’ surrogates.
Trivia: Actress Elizabeth Banks is one of the executive producers on this film.
We've all heard stories about people meeting others in chat rooms who don't appear as they really are. Some big fat guy posing as a young girl or someone much older acting as if they are younger. What if you could live day-to-day like that? What if you had the ability to go out into the world as not who you are, but who you want to be? This is the clever scenario used in the comic book The Surrogates, which has now been adapted into a film starring Bruce Willis and directed by Jonathan Mostow (Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines).
The premise itself asks a lot of questions about the way people are. If we had this ability, would crime really go down? Or would the anonymity of having a machine represent us make us more likely to commit crime? You could conceivably murder someone and leave no DNA evidence. Would anyone turn down this new lifestyle or would everyone embrace it? What of the lower class citizens? Surely they wouldn't be able to afford new robots. It's not a bad thing for a movie to raise questions, I'm just pointing out how an intelligent premise like this could make for an epic sci-fi thriller.
The story begins with a murder. The surrogate robot is killed in such a way that it kills the person as well. Sort of like in the Nightmare series when Freddy kills someone in their dreams. The only problem is, you're not supposed to be affected when your surrogate is disabled. So this is a powerful weapon being used and Agent Tom Greer (Willis) is on the case. Unfortunately, he has to leave his surrogate behind when it's damaged and he can't get a new one. Soon he finds himself one of the only real people left trying to solve a murder.
I mentioned the fact this movie's premise brings up questions. The movie itself brings up even more questions, which is a failing of it's script more than it's intriguing ideas. We never really get an explanation as to why several people are against the use of these robots, for example. Outside of a vague cries of "abomination", their motives aren't too clear. In the comic series, the motives are clear...but then again, this takes a lot of twists and turns that are unlike that on which it is based. The result is a weak script that wastes it's potential to make a generic sci-fi action movie. It throws in plot twists and an ending seems way too clean for my tastes. That's all I can really say without giving it away.
I did enjoy a few of the elements however. Bruce Willis can act in his sleep these days, but he provides a credible performance as a man who is growing increasingly dissatisfied with the use of artificial life in exchange for a real one. I sympathized with him here, as you could tell who was phony by the way their surrogate looked (for example, a nerdy pale white guy's surrogate is a giant black man). Willis was a fine choice to lead this film, as he manages to carry most of it on his back. We also have a fairly strong supporting cast which includes James Cromwell, Radha Mitchell and Ving Rhames. Although I thought the way Rhames looked was a little too goofy to be taken seriously.
The action sequences, for what they are, aren't too bad. Towards the middle of the film there is a chase scene that involves a helicopter crash that I really enjoyed. I would say however, this is another opportunity of wasted potential. These people are using robots. You could have inflicted a lot of damage to them and even break more physics laws than you did without getting an R-rating. I'd hate to praise anything about Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen, but at least Michael Bay had no problem ripping robots to shreds. However, massive robot damage doesn't really occur here, as we get standard action scenes. Not bad, but they could have been a lot better.
I liked Surrogates. It takes advantage of having Bruce Willis as it's star, even if it doesn't always deliver in it's action sequences and felt weak. The problem with this film is that it choose to toe the line. It's not intelligent enough to be a thinking man's sci-fi film and it's not dumb enough to be an enjoyable "turn your brain off" actioner. Instead it's just average. Not good, not bad, just average.
The 411: Surrogates feels like wasted potential. Jonathan Mostow had the chance to make an excellent sci-fi film using his cast, premise and the source material. But with a weak script and generic and disappointing action scenes, it doesn't live up to my expectations. It's not a bad film and I did enjoy it. My problem was that it wasn't as good as it could and should have been.
i think this is one of those movies that you have to watch twice to get. But yeah i thought it was a major dissapointment. Bruce willis was still good in it though. But I robot was better then this film.
Posted By: Guest#4782 (Guest) on September 28, 2009 at 02:24 AM
I agree with the review (though very brief). There were some elements I quite liked but many things that just didn't work or go far enough. Willis does an excellent job and the cast when playing the surrogates offers the appropriate lack of emotion. But with the exception of Willis there is no juxtaposition to their true selves. Maybe that was the point, society growing more distant, but it really came across rather "meh"
Unlike most movies of this genre their is no distinct "bad guy". The motves of the antagonist are understandable and from his point justifiable.
When the climax came I was thinking that I was ok with either outcome, so the tension and excitement that was intended never came to be.
5 out of 10, you could do worse, but you could do better as well
Posted By: ckwebguy (Guest) on September 28, 2009 at 03:20 AM
I wouldn't care if you gave this movie a 1. Bruce is one of the few right-leaning actors in Whorrywood, so I'll pay my hard-earned money just to support him.
Posted By: Film Critic (Guest) on September 28, 2009 at 03:58 AM
Film Critic - I think Bruce has a few more qualities about him that warrant viewing his films, not just political views you happen to agree with.
Posted By: Bimmy (Guest) on September 28, 2009 at 11:43 AM
Film Critic - I think Bruce has a few more qualities about him that warrant viewing his films, not just political views you happen to agree with.
Posted By: Bimmy (Guest) on September 28, 2009 at 11:43 AM
You're absolutely right. He makes good movies, too, but it helps that he takes some conservative stances on certain things as well. It just makes it easier for me to support his films. In the long run, maybe it's unimportant, but it's meaningful to me to support and encourage people who share my views. I feel that if more people did that, we could rein in some of these Hollywood wackos, because ultimately, the market will dictate who appears on screen. I mean, a person might be the greatest actor of all time, but if their political activity turns off a large segment of the population, thus reducing the take at the box office, they'll get fewer movies. Not none, to be sure, but fewer. Sean Penn comes to mind immediately...good actor, but he's such an obnoxious, preachy douchenozzle that a lot of people won't see a movie he's in. In addition, I don't thing even most of the Hollywood wackos are really that liberal and weird...they just do what they have to do to keep working. Again, probably not important to anyone but me, and I certainly don't demand everyone else subscribe to my way of thinking, but I like to support those people whose political philosophy is more in line with mine.
Posted By: Film Critic (Guest) on September 28, 2009 at 12:24 PM
Just saw this and I agree on the ending. The looming consequence that was built up the whole entire movie (ya know, the source of all the tensiong and, therefore, interest?) came to absolutely nothing, so what could have been a whopper of an ending felt neutered to create happy ending. Sure, it would have been a real bummer ending, but I would have respected the poop out of it. Instead I felt let down and actually a bit peeved - don't insult my intelligence by assuming I won't notice the giant plot point you just dropped.
But the action was good, the premise raised lots of questions, and it certainly held up a mirror to our society in a number of ways. And Bruce Willis could win an Oscar for playing a camel in your local church's nativity, so of course he was great to watch.
Posted By: Guest (Guest) on September 28, 2009 at 04:37 PM
I wanted Blade Runner. I got .....well something more along the line of The Stepford Wives.
But how cool would Bruce Willis be as Deckard in a Blade Runner reboot/remake/sequel. Not that Harrison Ford wasn't grat in the original.
Posted By: grumpy (Guest) on September 28, 2009 at 07:43 PM
but I like to support those people whose philosophy is more in line with mine.
Posted By: Film Critic (Guest) on September 28, 2009 at 12:24 PM
I guess you support the hell out of Roman Polanski movies.
Posted By: Fozzy D'Orazio (Guest) on September 29, 2009 at 06:53 AM
I can understand your view Film Critic. I won't watch anything with Sean Penn in it either and i'm not even a republican. There are plenty of actors/actresses out there that annoy me to such an extent that I won't watch their movies regardless of how good of a performer they are or how good the movie is (Susan Surandon comes to mind). I just don't limit that to politics.
Posted By: stronelis (Guest) on September 29, 2009 at 03:11 PM
Wow....get the hell over yourselves people! Other people's views or beliefs should have nothing to do with a viewing a goddamn movie! Christ..
Posted By: Erik (Guest) on September 29, 2009 at 07:35 PM
Wow....get the hell over yourselves people! Other people's views or beliefs should have nothing to do with a viewing a goddamn movie! Christ..
Posted By: Erik (Guest) on September 29, 2009 at 07:35 PM
Well, it does to ME, who is the only person I can speak for. See, you arrogant, self-centered ass...my post was only meant to reflect what *I* thought. If you disagree, fine. But you made it like I was telling *you* what to do or think. You're extremely self-absorbed. Read stuff before you comment, nitwit.
Posted By: Film Critic (Guest) on September 30, 2009 at 12:13 AM
Copyright � 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.