www.411mania.com
|  News |  Film Reviews |  Columns |  DVD/Other Reviews |  News Report | Search
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// Christopher Nolan To Mentor A New Superman Movie?
MUSIC
// Mariah Pisses Off Her Fans
WRESTLING
// Is Ric Flair Going To Wrestle For TNA?
POLITICS
// When Does Free Speech Become Bribery?
MMA
// 411 MMA Rankings: Middleweight Division
BOXING
// 411 Boxing Fact or Fiction: Valero, Mayweather-Mosley, ShoBox, Allan Green, More
GAMES
// 411 Games Fact or Fiction: Fallout: New Vegas, Sonic the Hedgehog 4, Heavy Rain




MOVIE REVIEW  MOVIE REVIEWS
//  From Paris with Love Review
//  Fish Tank Review
//  Dread Review
//  Edge of Darkness Review
//  When in Rome Review
//  Police, adjective Review
 HOT MOVIES
//  Iron Man 2
//  The Avengers
//  Watchmen
//  Transformers 2
//  Bruno
//  G.I. Joe
//  The Hobbit
SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds





Follow 411mania on Twitter!




Add 411 On Facebook
 



 
 411mania » Movies » Film Reviews
Advertisement
The Twilight Saga: New Moon Review [2]
Posted by Trevor Snyder on 11.22.2009



THE TWILIGHT SAGA: NEW MOON (2009)



Directed by: Chris Weitz
Written by: Melissa Rosenberg
Based on the book by: Stephenie Meyer
Starring: Robert Pattinson, Kristen Stewart, Taylor Lautner, Billy Burke, Ashley Greene, Michael Sheen
Rated PG-13 for some violence and action (allegedly).

In a way, The Twilight Saga: New Moon is a very comforting film. For almost all of my life I’ve been taught that werewolves and vampires are dangerous creatures to be feared. Thanks to author Stephenie Meyer, I now know that not to be true. Turns out both werewolf and vampire alike are far too busy whining, brooding, and posing in slow motion to pose any kind of threat if actually encountered.

This brooding nature of theirs also helps explain why both sparkly-vampire Edward Cullen (Robert Pattison) and newly-emerged werewolf Jacob Black (Taylor Lautner) would fall for a girl like Bella Swan (Kristen Stewart), a character completely defined by her antisocial awkwardness and sullen demeanor. New Moon picks up a few months after the first Twilight tale, and the relationship between Edward and Bella is still going hot and heavy – if by “hot and heavy” you mean he barely looks at her while speaking and she does nothing but constantly nag him to turn her into a vampire. Her reasoning is understandable, somewhat – she pictures a future where she is a withered old woman and he is still a handsome young man. Although Edward assures her this wouldn’t bother him, she (perhaps rightfully) still finds the whole thing a little gross.

Bella’s argument for why she would be better off as a vampire seems to gain some traction when a birthday party thrown in her honor at the Cullen’s home turns disastrous after she accidentally cuts her finger. This throws Edward’s younger “brother” Jasper into an uncontrollable bloodlust. At this point you can’t help but wonder if this means she is never allowed to visit during that certain time of the month – but of course this play-it-safe series isn’t going anywhere near that question.

Still not wanting to give in to Bella’s “vamp me, please” demands, Edward instead decides the only way he can truly protect her is to pack up with his family and leave, telling her she will never see him again. He does this despite both of them knowing that the evil vampire Victoria (Rachel Lefevre) is still out there looking for revenge for the Cullen’s murder of her mate, James. It apparently never even occurs to Edward that Victoria might come for Bella in his absence (which, of course, she does), so you really do kinda wonder about his qualifications as a decent boyfriend.

Edward’s disappearance leaves Bella in a funk, which is kind of the understatement of the year. In the montage that follows, Bella spends the next few months either simply sitting in a chair staring out the window or curling up in bed and screaming, as if going through heroin withdrawal. I think a lot of guys would like to believe this is what girls do after they break up with them, but I don’t know – the whole thing looks pretty silly here. Anyway, Bella eventually discovers that she can catch ghostly glimpses of Edward if she just does life-threateningly dangerous acts (because he made her promise not to, you see), and so she becomes an “adrenalin junkie,” throwing herself into one mind-numbingly stupid activity after another.

Things start to look up a little for Bella, however, when her old friend Jacob comes back on the scene. Although she initially goes to Jacob only for help in fixing some old motorcycles (the better to cheat death with), the two are soon bonding more than ever before. Jacob, who has never trusted the Cullens, promises never to leave Bella like Edward did. At this point, most audience members will no doubt notice that Jacob does seem like a much nicer (and certainly more charismatic) guy than Edward, which make Bella’s constant rebuffs just a tad annoying.

But wait! Just when things maybe are starting to develop between the two, Jacob does leave Bella, exactly what he promised not to do. It turns out Jacob has a secret of his own - he's a werewolf, of course. Although Jacob and his wolf-pack buddies are decent enough fellows (they don’t kill humans, and are actually charged with protecting the area from evil vampires), Jacob is still worried that the slightest mistake or moment of anger might cause him to lash out and hurt Bella. So, to clarify, at this point Bella has not only found out that both guys she likes are supernatural creatures, but they have both told her she’s better off without them. This girl is cruising to a suicidal breakdown, to be sure.

Then again, she might not have to worry about offing herself, since Victoria and fellow vamp Laurent (Edi Gathegi) soon arrive, looking to take care of it themselves. Jacob and crew rush to Bella’s protection, but a still-jealous Jacob has no problem intentionally misleading Edward into believing Bella has indeed perished. This sends a despondent Edward to the Volturi, an ancient sect of vampires located in Italy. Edward hopes the Volturi will grant his wish to be destroyed, as he believes he has nothing to un-live for anymore. When Bella gets wind of this from Edward’s sister Alice (Ashley Greene), she ignores Jacob’s pleas to forget about Edward, and instead rushes to Italy to try to save her former flame.

Quickly glancing over this plot description, I realize some of this sounds like it might actually be somewhat interesting. Let me just clarify – it isn’t. After sitting through all 130 tedious minutes of New Moon, it’s only natural to ask, “What is wrong with this movie? How does a film featuring warring vampires and werewolves end up so lifeless?”

It’s tempting to blame the listless performances, but perhaps a bit unfair. To be sure, none of the film’s leads are going to win any notable acting accolades for their work here (although I’m sure some MTV and Teen Choice Awards are in their future), but the only truly bad performance is from Pattinson, who shows none of the (very) faint charm he had in the first film. This time around, he plays every scene like some sort of morose automaton, his constant pained expression doing nothing to help explain why Bella would find this guy so captivating. Lautner, on the other hand, is likable enough – but it’s doubtful more people will be talking about his dramatic skills than they will his new chiseled six-pack abs.

Then there’s Kristen Stewart as Bella, who might just be one of the most unappealing heroines in pop-culture history. I’ve seen a lot of people blame this on Stewarts jittery, nervous performance (which isn’t that far off from her real-life personality), but I don’t think that’s the case. Stewart’s problem is the character she is playing. Bella is, quite frankly, an unlikable brat. Besides her constant nagging of Edward to turn her (despite his logical arguments against it) and her condescending treatment of Jacob, let us also consider the way she treats her well-meaning father (Billy Burke), constantly ignoring his demands to stay home and out of trouble. Whenever she rushes off to one of her purposeful near-death experiences, I was wondering if she ever once thought about the pain she would cause her father (not to mention her mother and other friends) if she was to be killed. Seemingly, she just doesn’t care – as long as she gets to see that split-second flash of Edward, everyone else can go to hell. Well, let me just say – grow up, Bella.

So, there is the real problem, then. Stewart is simply playing the character the way Meyer wrote it, and that exposes the true problem with these films – the source material itself. Now, I haven’t read New Moon, but I did read Twilight. I know, I know – but, in my defense, I work in a bookstore, and I wanted to see what all the hype was about (and this was before it got really huge). What I found was appallingly awful. Terrible characterization, trite dialogue, and a central relationship that seems to promote abusive relationships (that’s right, mom and dad – these books do suggest that the perfect guy is one who breaks into a girl’s room at night to watch her sleep, and who is seen as “romantic” because he is constantly fighting a strong urge to kill her). I’m not kidding around here; I think it’s legitimately depressing that this series has gotten as big as it has with an audience of impressionable young women (to say nothing of the even creepier middle-aged mom crowd, who have no problem tsk-tsk-ing men who look at young girls, but then themselves can be seen swooning over posters of a shirtless 17-year-old Taylor Lautner).

Now, with New Moon, director Chris Weitz becomes the second director (after Twilight’s Catherine Hardwicke) to crumple under the crushing blandness of Stephenie Meyer’s books and screenwriter Melissa Rosenberg’s equally insipid screenplays. Weitz tries hard; I’ll give him that. With a few clever montages and 360-degree shots, he brings a visual flair to the sequel that the first film never captured. But he also falls right into some of the same traps – not all of which are necessarily his doing (the constant hilariously melodramatic dialogue), but some of which probably are (frustrating over-usage of slow-motion, which at times feels like it’s stretching this movie out by about 30 minutes).

Is there anything worth recommending here? Well, yeah, a little. Michael Sheen, not surprisingly, is a lot of fun as Aro, leader of the Volturi – he brings the same kind of zealous overacting flair that he previously showed as head werewolf Lucian in the Underworld films (now we just need Sheen to play Frankenstein’s monster, in order to hit the classic movie monster trifecta). In the same sequence, I also enjoyed the appearance of Dakota Fanning as the evil Jane – not because her character was actually important or anything, but because I found it humorous how she was so blatantly included just so that the audience would go, “oh, look, it’s Dakota Fanning!” Meanwhile, there is one legitimately exciting scene – a nifty battle between Victoria and the werewolves in the forest. This sequence is the only time the movie even comes close to delivering on the potential of the whole werewolves vs. vampires thing, and it’s admittedly pretty cool (no doubt helped, I should say, by being set to Thom Yorke’s excellent contribution to the soundtrack).

Three faint compliments for a two hour and ten minute movie, though, is nothing to get too excited about. The biggest praise I have heard from Twilight apologists about this movie is that it’s “at least better than the first one.” I am here to tell you that it is not. The first film, while equally corny, at least felt like it had some actual forward momentum in its storytelling. New Moon is little more than unlikable characters standing around in the woods, pouting at one another. It has no idea how to bring any excitement to the plate, despite setting scenes in lush Italian castles and featuring werewolves as big as minivans. There are still two more of these films on the way, and unless both Bella and Edward receive emergency charisma transplants, I can’t imagine things getting better anytime soon. Then again, the early box-office numbers on New Moon confirm that it doesn’t really matter what I say. The audience has spoken, and clearly what they want is not a captivating story with memorable personalities, but rather a wish-washy soap opera with monsters so wimpy they’d probably get picked on by emo kids. It’s really pretty sad, if you stop to think about it…although I would suggest you don’t.


The 411: For a film all about werewolves and vampires, The Twilight Saga: New Moon is remarkably bloodless - a largely glum affair sunk by melodramatic posturing, impossible to like characters, and a slow-as-molasses narrative. Maybe young girls and some of their moms will eat this stuff up, but there is almost nothing here to get excited about. This is one of the more disheartening examples of a pop-culture phenomenon in recent memory, to be sure.
 
Final Score:  4.0   [ Poor ]  legend


Post Comment (26)  |  Email Trevor Snyder  |  View Trevor Snyder's 411 Profile

  Send To Friend  |    Stumble It!  |    Digg It!  | 



Please add your comment below.
If you are registered, you can login and post under your registered name. If not, you can post as a guest or register.

* Please note that 411 moderates all comments. Your comment will show up on the site after it has been approved by an editor.
 
Name : 
Comment : 
Remaining Characters : 
2800
 

Comments (26)

 
That's all I needed to read. lol

Posted By: paco smith (Guest)  on November 22, 2009 at 12:13 AM

 
 
Mopey the vampire and muscle-man the werewolf fight over stammer-girl. Every bit as exciting as it sounds.

Oops, I forgot to paste that. lol


Posted By: paco smith (Guest)  on November 22, 2009 at 12:14 AM

 
 
there is no way it should have broken any records

Posted By: iceberg (Guest)  on November 22, 2009 at 01:36 AM

 
 
For pro-wrestling fans:

Jake's wolfpack usual get-up is John Cena's ring attire. HHH or HBK should rib him on that before or during the Survivor Series.


Posted By: Michael316 (Guest)  on November 22, 2009 at 02:21 AM

 
 
When I was a little kid, the super power I REALLY wanted to have was the ability to sparkle.

Posted By: Pwnage (Guest)  on November 22, 2009 at 03:05 AM

 
 
These movies are a disgrace. Everyone knows real vampires eat Chinese Food, ride motorcycles, dangle from bridges and hang out at Tim Cappello concerts!

Posted By: Edgar Frog (Guest)  on November 22, 2009 at 06:53 AM

 
 
a gay vampire beats a gay joker at the box office big whoop throw in the dead pedophile and you have an abomination sandwich for all the politically correct dipshits to whack on.

Posted By: Guest#4273 (Guest)  on November 22, 2009 at 10:38 AM

 
 
Ya'll wanna to see a "new moon"? I'lle show you a "new moon". Ok so it isn't exactly "new" but it's still a moon. *Unbuckling pants*. But seriously, I'm surprised nobody has dove into the goldmine this little pun of a title has to offer.

Posted By: the dude (Guest)  on November 22, 2009 at 10:55 AM

 
 
Mopey the vampire and muscle-man the werewolf fight over stammer-girl. Every bit as exciting as it sounds."

Lol that was brilliant


Posted By: Guest#7845 (Guest)  on November 22, 2009 at 01:51 PM

 
 
thank god my girlfriend knows and cares little about the Twilight Saga. I am surprised at the number of adult women who are into this series though. I work with a few women who are fans and i thought they were more mature than that.

Posted By: Guest#6604 (Guest)  on November 22, 2009 at 02:10 PM

 
 
First off, you are just trying to be different by slamming something alot of people like. Twilight and New Moon are really good movies. Are they as good as the Dark Knight? no, but, you should really give credit where credit is due. I feel they have really turned a book series in to something amazing. but oh well to each his own I love the twilight saga and I can't wait for Eclipse :)

Posted By: Nikki (Guest)  on November 22, 2009 at 02:41 PM

 
 
There is one: Teenage girls and wannabe teenage girls with too many confusing hormones. Hollywood panders to the lowest of low and this film sort of proves that.

Everyone involved in this film and the Author of the book needs to be set on fire.


Posted By: Regie Bathoria (Guest)  on November 22, 2009 at 02:43 PM

 
 
Just shows the average movie goer is a complete dumbass. Started watching Twilight last night, and couldn't help but make fun of it the whole way.

Posted By: Joe (Guest)  on November 22, 2009 at 02:54 PM

 
 
HAHAHAHAHA,dude,that was just plain awesome.

Posted By: jonah (Guest)  on November 22, 2009 at 04:04 PM

 
 
Just shows the average movie goer is a complete dumbass. Started watching Twilight last night, and couldn't help but make fun of it the whole way.

Posted By: Joe (Guest) on November 22, 2009 at 02:54 PM

It just shows you that Twilight is Transformer's 2 for females. Really crappy, badly written, but with lots of defenders claiming that the critics are wrong, and don't "get it."

These are why we can't have good movies in theaters. Want a good vampire movie? Go watch Thirst. Hell, even Interview is a lot better. No. Instead of that, we get Supernatural Mormon Dawson's Creek.


Posted By: Torvald. (Guest)  on November 22, 2009 at 09:22 PM

 
 
I bet this review is better written than the books, and most likely the movies themselves. Excellent read, I was wondering about this but did not actually want to read the books or see the movies.

The comparison to Transformers sounds very apt. I did not see those movies either but read the reviews and I'm glad I didn't see them. I can only imagine that most intelligent people simply stopped going to movies with the advent of the internet and all the other options we have, leaving only the very bottom of the barrel who come out for these things.

But I could be completely wrong here and just grasping at straws. Actually when I was younger I noticed that most of the adults I knew didn't really watch movies or TV at all, maybe just some sports and that's it. Now I'm older and I guess I'm moving towards that too. Maybe it's just we are outgrowing this stuff.


Posted By: Guest#5617 (Guest)  on November 23, 2009 at 02:10 AM

 
 
Twilight is a great movie, one that people like to hate on across the 'OMGZ INTERNET' because it makes them seem 'cool'. People love to jump on this movie because it appeals just as much to the young group of people as one it does adults. Of course in today's world, hating on stuff that appeals to the younger generation is the 'cool' thing to do. Half the people who hate on the movies haven't seen them and do it simply because it's 'cool' to hate on popular stuff.

Also, what's this Dark Knight talk? Great? Please stop being silly guys. Dark Knight was by far the most boring Batman movie to date. Tried way too hard and just like the last two/most recent Bond movies, it's failed.


Posted By: SummerDogg (Guest)  on November 23, 2009 at 06:12 PM

 
 
For pro-wrestling fans:

Jake's wolfpack usual get-up is John Cena's ring attire. HHH or HBK should rib him on that before or during the Survivor Series.

Posted By: Michael316 (Guest) on November 22, 2009 at 02:21 AM

This just made my fucking day. "We can't see you? Why, cos you just changed into a wolf?"

I got dragged to this shit by my friends who are apparently thirteen-year-old girls, one of which was seeing it for his SECOND time. I fell asleep several times (and I'm not trying to be funny, I literally did, and I wasn't the only one), only jerked awake by the melodramatic dialogue or lack-of-real-action action scenes. Truly, truly awful.


Posted By: neverAcquiesce (Guest)  on November 23, 2009 at 06:37 PM

 
 
who ever posted that about the wolves wearing John Cena's wrestling gear that was great.
As for the review the part that I liked is the intro its a hell of a way to pull the person into your opinion

"For almost all of my life I’ve have been taught that werewolves and vampires are dangerous creatures to be feared."

Now for all the people saying that what if the first stories about vampires or werewolves painted them as the weak creatures that did nothing more but slipped into a depression at the things that they can't control?

The first movie while just too long tried to do a different take on vampires and that I guess is the rule you don't break. never make a vampire seem less of a monster/creature/hellbound whatever. Again thats opinion, problem with that is most respect an opinion but no one respects bitching about it. As for the books, this woman is not some master of the art of writing she took an idea pitched it and got it published. It made its way to a movie and its fans took it to what will now be a complete set of 4 movies. Bashing the movie does what? You can't stop it now the momentum started last year, telling people not to see it didn't work then, didn't work this time and barring a complete flop in six or 7 months it won't work for the third movie. While the reported acting wasn't miles ahead of the first one, most reviews between talkin shit said the actign was better this time around. They have two more chances to get it right. And even then just because its not the traditional fiction on what a vampire/werewolf dynamic should be it will get bashed. At this point let the teens, young adults, and those hiding in the shadows too afraid to admit they like Twilight enjoy something. Truth be told the amount of remakes in Hollywood now you will have way more shit to criticize movie wise.


Posted By: Guest#3661 (Guest)  on November 24, 2009 at 05:10 PM

 
 
People love to jump on this movie because it appeals just as much to the young group of people as one it does adults. Of course in today's world, hating on stuff that appeals to the younger generation is the 'cool' thing to do. Half the people who hate on the movies haven't seen them and do it simply because it's 'cool' to hate on popular stuff.

...because all of us adults hate kids' classics like Shrek, Up, Toy Story and the like, huh? Another guy saying dumb shit, it has nothing to do with the younger generations appeal, it just isnt that good to people, are you hurt because of one man's opinion? everytime EVERYONE doesnt like something they feel the people who dont like it are just hating on the success

"If I dont like it, I dont like it, that dont mean that im hatin"-Common fuckin Sense


Posted By: nic (Guest)  on November 25, 2009 at 02:58 AM

 
 
**********
Twilight and New Moon are really good movies.
**********

Bullshit. Between Twilight's emo sparkle-pires and Anne Rice's thinly-disguised gay porn romps, most people don't even remember what a real vampire movie should be like.


Posted By: Scott B (Guest)  on November 26, 2009 at 04:31 PM

 
 
First off, you are just trying to be different by slamming something alot of people like. Twilight and New Moon are really good movies. Are they as good as the Dark Knight? no, but, you should really give credit where credit is due. I feel they have really turned a book series in to something amazing. but oh well to each his own I love the twilight saga and I can't wait for Eclipse :)

Posted By: Nikki (Guest) on November 22, 2009 at 02:41 PM

Fucking chicks defending this steaming pile of shit.

This is far far worse then that turd Transformers 2,and that one took months to flush.

Sad sad state of affairs that this garbage could share the same air as TDK.


Posted By: Showster (Guest)  on November 27, 2009 at 02:49 AM

 
 
Somebody really needs to go to the Brian Lumley Necroscope books for sourc material on vampires.This just seems like Buffy/Angel rehashing only with way more saccahrin

Posted By: guest666 (Guest)  on November 27, 2009 at 02:52 AM

 
 
Twilight is a great movie, one that people like to hate on across the 'OMGZ INTERNET' because it makes them seem 'cool'. People love to jump on this movie because it appeals just as much to the young group of people as one it does adults. Of course in today's world, hating on stuff that appeals to the younger generation is the 'cool' thing to do. Half the people who hate on the movies haven't seen them and do it simply because it's 'cool' to hate on popular stuff.

Also, what's this Dark Knight talk? Great? Please stop being silly guys. Dark Knight was by far the most boring Batman movie to date. Tried way too hard and just like the last two/most recent Bond movies, it's failed.

Posted By: SummerDogg

*****

Says people who hate on Twilight hate on it because it's popular. Then trashes the Dark Knight.

Pot. Kettle. Black. And I don't mean Jacob.


Posted By: Chief Sleeping Leg (Registered)  on December 02, 2009 at 12:04 AM

 
 
First off, amazing review. I unfortunately, read the books because my friend said, it gets better. Let me tell you...it doesn't get better. It actually gets worse and more ridiculous with each book. I mean come on, the first books, first 200 and some pages described how beautiful in every possible synonym found in a thesaurus for beautiful Edward was. I love how these books/movies, teach young girls, if your boyfriend breaks up with you you might as well kill yourself. What a message to be sending!

Posted By: Cheryl (Guest)  on December 07, 2009 at 01:10 AM

 
 
I feel like I should post merely to say that I'm a teenage girl (okay, I'm 18, a little older than the 12 year old demographic) and Twilight is the single worst thing I have ever read and sends feminism back 50 years. On that basis, I've never seen any of the films because it would just be worse visually. Transformers 2 would be better... and Transformers 2 was fucking terrible.

Posted By: Jessica (Guest)  on December 18, 2009 at 01:07 AM

 


www.41mania.com
Copyright © 2005 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.