www.411mania.com
|  News |  Film Reviews |  Columns |  DVD/Other Reviews |  News Report |
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// Holly Henderson Puts Her Big Boobs On Display While Sucking On Ice Cream Cone
MUSIC
// Katy Perry Rocks Tight Dress & Shows Off Cleavage In NYC
WRESTLING
// WWE Suspends Chris Jericho
POLITICS
// Just Say No to the Police Using Drones
MMA
// 411's MMA Roundtable - UFC 146: Dos Santos vs. Mir
GAMES
// New Transformers: Fall of Cybertron Featurette


MOVIE REVIEW  MOVIE REVIEWS
//  What to Expect When You're Expecting Review
//  Battleship Review [2]
//  Battleship Review
//  Dark Shadows Review
//  The Dictator Review
//  The Raven Review
 HOT MOVIES
//  The Dark Knight Rises
//  The Avengers
//  Prometheus
//  The Amazing Spider-Man
//  Iron Man 3
//  The Hobbit
SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds





Follow 411mania on Twitter!




Add 411 On Facebook
 



 
 411mania » Movies » Film Reviews



Advertisement
Clash Of The Titans 3D Review
Posted by Jeffrey Harris on 04.02.2010





Directed By: Louis Leterrier
Written By: Travis Beacham, Phil Hay, Matt Manfredi, and Lawrence Kasdan; Based on the 1981 movie written by Beverley Cross
Runtime: 118 minutes
MPAA Rating: Rated PG-13 for fantasy action violence, some frightening images and brief sensuality.

Perseus - Sam Worthington
Zeus - Liam Neeson
Hades - Ralph Fiennes
Calibos / Acrisius - Jason Flemyng
Io - Gemma Arterton
Draco - Mads Mikkelson
Spyros - Pete Postlethwaite
Andremeda - Alexa Davalos

With the success of Avatar, Hollywood is going crazy in bringing back the 3D movies. This is a detriment to the future of cinema with respects to movies like Clash of The Titans. Because of Avatar, movie studios believe they can get away with rushing a big budget studio tentpole into a quick, hacked together 3D conversion process. And that is what causes the lugubrious experience of Clash of The Titans 3D. As far as 3D goes, Clash of The Titans is the worst looking 3D movie I've ever seen.

To the credit of the producers and filmmakers, Clash of The Titans was not conceived or shot for the 3D experience. This decision was of course made because of Avatar. Avatar was in 3D right? So that's what everyone wants to see, right? Well, not like this. The 3D element only ruins what at times looks like a cool looking movie. For a movie that's supposed to be 3D, very little actually looks 3D about it. I saw Captain E-O several weeks ago at Disneyland, and that is better and more of a convincing 3D film than Clash of the Titans. The problem is that despite this being shown in 3D, it does NOT look 3D. The picture seems to have very little depth, even when the dreaded Kraken makes it's long-awaited appearance. Wearing the 3D glasses for the movie only served to make the picture blurrier, fuzzier, darker, and harder to see. This was not an exciting 3D experience that really feels like you can reach out and touch something. The only part of the movie that truly looked 3D was the CG closing credit sequence at the end.

As far as the movie goes, the original 1980's classic of the same name remains the true classic for a reason. The original Clash of The Titans was an epic, romantic, and heroic adventure. There are cheesy and hammy elements, but the movie is so charming and well done you don't care. Titans is charming and cinematic in a way that movies of the present simply cannot measure up. Director Louis Leterrier working from a script by several screenwriters does not truly understand what made the original so great. The new film is similar to the original but it only glosses those similar elements over. Perseus is never truly tested. Everything Perseus needs is simply there for him to take conveniently. The Gods are minor, insignificant characters in this story save for the petty Zeus (Liam Neeson) and the vengeful Hades (Ralph Fiennes).

You see the Gods are angry because humans are starting to provoke and reject the Gods. And the Gods of Olympus, like Zeus, require the love, prayers, and devotion of mankind in order to gain their strength and immortality. Hades is ticked since Zeus left Hades to the Underworld, and Hades conspires to overthrow Zeus (basically ripping off the plot from Disney's 1997 animated Hercules movie). The citizens of the metropolitan city of Argos have torn down the giant statue of Zeus, and in anger Zeus allows Hades to strike back against humanity. In doing so, Hades ends up killing a visiting family of fishermen. The family includes the adult son Perseus (Worthington), the only survivor. Perseus is rescued by Argos soldiers and taken to the king of Argos' court. There Hades kills Queen Cassiopeia for provoking the Gods and claiming her kindly daughter, Andromeda (Davalos), to be more beautiful than Aphrodite. Hades decrees that Argos will be destroyed in 10 days by the Kraken unless Andromeda is sacrificed and reveals to the king that Perseus is a demigod and the son of Zeus. You see Perseus was found as a baby in a coffin at sea with his dead mother by the benevolent fisherman, Spyros (Postlethwaite). Perseus was sired by Zeus disguising himself as a sacrilegious king, Acrisius (Flemyng). Acrisius is deformed for sacrificing the queen and Perseus to the sea and transformed into Calibos.

Guided by the ageless and beautiful sage, Io (Arterton), who has watched over Perseus since birth, Perseus goes on a quest with other Argos soldiers to figure out a way to kill the Kraken. Killing the Kraken would weaken Hades and allow Perseus to get some much desired payback. Arterton looks great and does her best as Io, however the reasoning for why Io is helping Perseus is never given or made clear.

Once again, there are many similar elements in the movie to the original, but the director and screenwriters do not understand what made the original great. The Greek Gods are fairly meaningless and unimportant characters in this movie. While the Gods look really cool they generally say and do nothing. The figurines in the halls of Mt. Olympus representing humanity are there, but they serve no true purpose. They are nothing more than window dressing. Pegasus is in the movie, but Pegasus is just there because the hero needs a ride to fly on a little later. In the most ironic scene of the movie, as Perseus and the other soldiers of Argos prepare to leave and are packing, Perseus happens to pick up Bubo the owl from the original movie in a pile of junk. Perseus asks what Bubo is and is told to leave it and Bubo is tossed aside. I'm sure the writers and filmmakers were tripping over themselves with this clever in-joke and nod to the 1981 original. What's ironic is that this reference more or less feels like an insult against the original movie while Bubo the Owl, say what you will about Bubo, had more charm and endearing qualities than the entirety of this movie. The screenwriters must felt themselves very clever for putting this joke in, when the joke is really this movie.

Sam Worthington once again fails as a leading man. Now Worthington does have strengths. Worthington does have a mean stare and a good look, but that's it. His Perseus is painfully one-note. He's angry, scowling, and focused on his revenge. His would-be romance with Io lacks any chemistry. Worthington simply doesn't demonstrate the romantic and charming qualities that a lead character like Perseus desperately needs. Perseus in this story through his selfishness and focus and rejection of his Godlike heritage gets tons of people killed and this makes Perseus unlikable. And at the end when Perseus is supposed to have his heroic, pre-battle speech, it feels empty and hollow. It's hard to really feel for Perseus as a character when Perseus is barely even established before his family is killed and he's ready to start fighting the Gods and getting revenge.

There seems to be some sort of commentary in this story about religion and worship. However at the start when you see humanity declaring war on the Gods and rejecting the Gods, it sort of makes the citizens and royalty of Argos look like jerks. Spyros' criticizes the Gods for their cruelty against mankind, but is mankind no less cruel than the Gods? Leterrier and the writers don't try going deeper and addressing these things, making their attempt at some sort of profound commentary rather pretentious and preachy.

Now this isn't all bad. The action scenes are at times exciting. The movie at times certainly looks good even as horrible as it looks in 3D. The locations and production design look quite grand and epic. The design for Olympus and the Gods are also well done. The sad thing is, I love stories about Greek mythology. I hate how movies like Troy try and play up the realism and don't include the Gods and mythological parts of the story. This makes the failure in execution of this story all the more saddening because an epic action-adventure movie about Greek mythology is something I've wanted to see for a long time. Instead we get things like Percy Jackson.

I just don't know this movie was forced to be in 3D when the conversion process does the film no favors and only bogs the movie down visually. What sucks the most is through many parts you can not make out creatures like Medusa, the harpies, and the Stygean Witches.


The 411: Do not waste the extra money required to see the movie in 3D. If you must see it, go for the standard 2D version as you will save some money and actually be able to see the movie and watch it the way it was meant to be seen. This is not a 3D film. It's a movie that was forced to be in 3D because of a fad-like trend. While Leterrier and his writers might claim to be fans of the original, they simply cannot recapture that greatness and have made a story that's limp, weak, and lacking in the charm, heroics, and romance of the true classic that was 1981's Clash of the Titans. Instead of this movie, I would stick with God of War 3.
 
Final Score:  5.0   [ Not So Good ]  legend


Post Comment (30)  |  Email Jeffrey Harris  |  View Jeffrey Harris's 411 Profile

  Send To Friend  |    Stumble It!  |    Digg It!  | 



Please add your comment below.
If you are registered, you can login and post under your registered name. If not, you can post as a guest or register.

* Please note that 411 moderates all comments. Your comment will show up on the site after it has been approved by an editor.
 
Name : 
Comment : 
Remaining Characters : 
2800
 

Comments (30)

 
"and Hades conspires to overthrow Zeus (basically ripping off the plot from Disney's 1997 animated Hercules movie)"

Or better, from the actual source...


Posted By: Ser Drake (Guest)  on April 01, 2010 at 11:30 PM

 
 
Except theres not a single historical myth of Hades trying to overthrow Zeus. Good effort though.

Posted By: Redhotrash (Guest)  on April 02, 2010 at 12:36 AM

 
 
Wow god of war isn't good people need to stop using that as a comparison. To me this movie looks great

Posted By: Iceberg (Guest)  on April 02, 2010 at 12:37 AM

 
 
Shoddy 3D conversions like this will lead to many dismissing 3D as a fad. Cameron used it properly in Avatar, but now every half-assed flick will be turned into a blurry mess to milk extra cash out of audiences.
Congrats Hollywood, it didn't take long to start killing the initial 3D buzz because of your greed.


Posted By: dennett316 (Guest)  on April 02, 2010 at 01:13 AM

 
 
There are stories well before the Disney movie where Hades tried to escape the underworld...may have not been in the original myths, my bad if I am wrong.

Posted By: Ser Drake (Guest)  on April 02, 2010 at 01:23 AM

 
 
Avoid all remakes.

Posted By: MBD (Guest)  on April 02, 2010 at 01:26 AM

 
 
I don't see the fuss about 3D. Call me old-fashioned, but I think a good script, good acting and good direction are what is important to a movie or TV show. Avatar was terrible, but it looked good. But that's not enough for me. I like watching online video sites and keep up to date with http://www.twitter.com/dozenvideo but I can't see what the 3D hype is all about. I think in 2 years, 3D will be yesterday's news. Don't believe the hype, 3D is just another gimmick.

Posted By: John (Guest)  on April 02, 2010 at 01:45 AM

 
 
Just got back from the theater and i liked it. It definitely wasn't great, but i would've given it a 7, not a 5.

Posted By: Red Cloud (Guest)  on April 02, 2010 at 04:18 AM

 
 
Considering everyone who reviewed Avatar on this site creamed themselves overthat piece of stinking, maggot-ridden dogshit, it makes me want to see Clash even more.

Posted By: Insider (Guest)  on April 02, 2010 at 05:47 AM

 
 
Wow god of war isn't good people need to stop using that as a comparison. To me this movie looks great

Posted By: Iceberg (Guest) on April 02, 2010 at 12:37 AM

No, it actually IS good, in fact it's the best modern iteration of the source material we have, this film proves how NOT to do it. I never liked how hades was always portrayed as the bad guy just because it's appropriate to have him do so. God of War actually got this one right. This film is complete fail.


Posted By: gooched (Guest)  on April 02, 2010 at 08:01 AM

 
 
:(

Posted By: is what this movie made me do. (Guest)  on April 02, 2010 at 09:32 AM

 
 
"and Hades conspires to overthrow Zeus (basically ripping off the plot from Disney's 1997 animated Hercules movie)"

Or better, from the actual source...

Posted By: Ser Drake (Guest) on April 01, 2010 at 11:30 PM

Or better yet... the Original Clash of the Titans?


Posted By: Jonathon (Guest)  on April 02, 2010 at 11:07 AM

 
 
In the myth Hades was NEVER condemned to the underworld. He was free to enter and leave as he pleased, he had just won it like Zeus won the sky and Posidon won the sea.

Also Hades was not a bad or evil god, if we used D&D alignment he would be Lawful Good/Neutral NOT some kind of villain that people play him out to be cause modern concept of Hades = Hell (when it doesn't).

The Gods themselves were humanized, they had the same desires and needs as humans physically and emotionally but with infinite lifespan and God powers.


Posted By: Martyn (Guest)  on April 02, 2010 at 12:08 PM

 
 
Wow god of war isn't good people need to stop using that as a comparison. To me this movie looks great

Posted By: Iceberg (Guest) on April 02, 2010 at 12:37 AM

No, it actually IS good, in fact it's the best modern iteration of the source material we have, this film proves how NOT to do it. I never liked how hades was always portrayed as the bad guy just because it's appropriate to have him do so. God of War actually got this one right. This film is complete fail.

Posted By: gooched (Guest) on April 02, 2010 at 08:01 AM

I'm all for the second post. I've played the first 2 games and have a feeling I'll buy a PS3 just to play GOW 3 since I find myself watching gameplay videos of it online and can only do it for so long. I've recently become addicted to Spartacus: Blood and Sand, and thought for a few episodes that Worthington was the title character, but hes not and actor actually doing the role is doing quite well.


Posted By: Guest#6556 (Guest)  on April 02, 2010 at 12:12 PM

 
 
Saw a midnight screening. The action and special effects were great but it seemed like every other scene was edited out. Things just happen for no reason other then to move the plot one step further without explaining it. Everything just moves so fast it doesn't give you any time to get to know any of the characters at all before it's over.

Posted By: EricG (Guest)  on April 02, 2010 at 01:47 PM

 
 
Jonathan,

Hades never tried to overthrow Zeus in the original Clash of The Titans movie. Try again.


Posted By: Jeffrey (Registered)  on April 02, 2010 at 02:11 PM

 
 
tis gonna be best movie of the yaer

Posted By: Iceman778 (Registered)  on April 02, 2010 at 02:31 PM

 
 
Lugubrious? Whoa.

Posted By: Guest#9133 (Guest)  on April 02, 2010 at 03:06 PM

 
 
From what I've heard, that sounds fair. COMPLETELY AGREE about 3D being shoehorned into every movie. It's like all those CGI for the sake of CGI movies that came out after Toy Story (ironic that Toy Story 3 is 3D.)
Side note: Jeffrey, muh man, you really must have had Hercules on the brain. The only other time I've heard/seen "lugubrious" used is in that movie: when Hades summons Pain, he responds "Coming, Your Most Lugubriousness!" (Yes, I recognize the epic nerdiness required to call that from memory.)


Posted By: Kyatollah (Guest)  on April 02, 2010 at 04:01 PM

 
 
You all do understand that in the 1981 version it was not Zeus and Hades, but Zeus and Poseidon, right? I don't understand the need to always make Hades the bad guy. As someone else said, Hades was neither good nor evil. He just ruled the underworld. Poseidon, on the other hand was very jealous and vengeful in many myths.

Posted By: Silent Ph03nix (Guest)  on April 02, 2010 at 06:30 PM

 
 
Well, the original Clash of the Titans wasn't a 'real' myth, so the remake need not follow the 'truth' behind the myth either. The argument of Hades never trying to oust Zeus is pretty weak. You either believe in those ancient Greek gods and really have no idea for sure what happened, because it happened over 2,000 years ago or you don't believe in those gods and then it really doesn't matter what 'really' happened. If we're going to sit and seriously argue the historical merit of this movie, then I think we're all missing the point. I'm looking forward to seeing it, it looks fun, and I highly doubt I'll be teaching an Ancient Greek History coarse at the local college afterwards.

Posted By: Rage (Guest)  on April 02, 2010 at 08:16 PM

 
 
Just saw the 2D version, not bad but Ursula Andress was missing.

Posted By: HoosierJim500 (Guest)  on April 02, 2010 at 10:04 PM

 
 
Just got back from seeing it and I'm not getting all the hate.

Posted By: The Great Capt. Smooth (Guest)  on April 02, 2010 at 10:27 PM

 
 
Sounds like it lives up to its predecesor.

Posted By: CottonMouthWolf (Guest)  on April 03, 2010 at 12:42 AM

 
 
We wish the Kraken the best in its future endeavors.

Posted By: Running Gag (Guest)  on April 03, 2010 at 05:28 AM

 
 
There are stories well before the Disney movie where Hades tried to escape the underworld...may have not been in the original myths, my bad if I am wrong.

Posted By: Ser Drake (Guest) on April 02, 2010 at 01:23 AM

You are.

The idea of Hades as a "bad" guy is a modern invention. In classic myths, he was cold, sure. But cold in the sense he was very business-like and took his job as ruler of Tartarus very seriously.

In the original Clash of the Titans, Poseidon was Zeus' foil, which is actually much more accurate to original Greek mythology. Poseidon was indeed a cranky old prick.


Posted By: Capt Sassypants (Guest)  on April 03, 2010 at 09:28 AM

 
 
"In the original Clash of the Titans, Poseidon was Zeus' foil..."


Maggie Smith played Posiedon????

Posiedon didn't even have a speaking part. At most he was a background character who opened and closed the Kraken Gate for Zeus like the little bitch he was.


Posted By: David O (Guest)  on April 05, 2010 at 06:14 AM

 
 
Saw it in 3d, unimpressed, looked horrible, the scorpion scene took ENTIRELY TOO LONG and the medusa scene was WAY TOO SHORT, and she wasn't naked, wtf? It was rushed, and where's the two headed dogs? Seriously, hollowood fails another one.

Posted By: Sawit (Guest)  on April 05, 2010 at 09:09 AM

 
 
I just released the Kraken in my pants.

Posted By: Lexington Steel (Guest)  on April 05, 2010 at 12:15 PM

 
 
Wow god of war isn't good people need to stop using that as a comparison. To me this movie looks great

Posted By: Iceberg (Guest) on April 02, 2010 at 12:37 AM

So because God of War and this film are the only two Greek mythology-themed stories IN HISTORY where a man kills a God, they shouldn't be compared?


Posted By: Guy (Guest)  on April 06, 2010 at 10:12 PM

 


www.41mania.com
Copyright (c) 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.