Inception Review
Posted by J.D. Dunn on 07.17.2010
"Our life is composed greatly from dreams, from the unconscious, and they must be brought into connection with action. They must be woven together." (Anais Nin)
D: Christopher Nolan W: Christopher Nolan
Leonardo DiCaprio.......Cobb
Joseph Gordon-Levitt....Arthur
Ellen Page..................Ariadne
Tom Hardy..................Eames
Ken Watanabe............Saito
Cillian Murphy.............Robert Fischer Jr.
It's amazing to watch Christopher Nolan become the filmmaker that M. Night Shyamalan was supposed to be. If Nolan isn't already in your top five regular directors, he should be. He first burst onto the mainstream scene with the gimmicky thriller Memento before hitting it big with the reboot of the Batman franchise, Batman Begins. His brilliant The Dark Knight transcended its comic-book roots to become a cinematic masterpiece. Inception allows us to see a master craftsman at work without the confines of gimmick or expectation.
To describe the plot of Inception is to do it a disservice, but briefly: Cobb (Leonardo DiCaprio) is an expert "extractor," a corporate spy who steals secrets from the minds of wealthy businessmen (Ken Watanabe) for profit. Of course, he's also haunted by a past he cannot (or, more appropriately, will not) escape from. He's aided in these efforts by Arthur (the ever-watchable Joseph Gordon-Levitt) and extractor-in-training Ariadne (Ellen Page). When a powerful businessman offers to wipe out charges against Cobb and let him return to America in exchange for a dangerous mission, Cobb reluctantly accepts. That's when the fun really begins.
All of this may sound a bit like the 1984 Dennis Quaid thriller Dreamscape, and there are certainly shared elements. Like Quentin Tarantino, Nolan nakedly wears his influences on his sleeve, but unlike Tarantino, who absorbed a steady diet of 1970s schlock and awful, Nolan doesn't shy away from nods to his contemporaries. As with The Dark Knight, the look and feel of the film is straight-up Michael Mann. The glossy, high-contrast darks and lovely orange city lights recall Heat and Collateral.
And, like Shyamalan, Nolan prefers an Impressionistic style of storytelling, allowing us only glimpses into each scene instead of going from point A to point B. He even cuts characters off in mid-dialogue, knowing that the viewer will finish their thoughts for them. The result is, appropriately, dreamlike, jumping from point to point rather than following a linear path. Even the Wachowski Bros. get a nod during a mind-blowing hallway fight sequence that bounces among all four walls of the room (not to mention the floor and ceiling!)
The performances are excellent, but with this cast, that's not surprising. True to Nolan's directorial inspiration, DiCaprio's Cobb seems like a character right out of a Michael Mann film, always serious and on-point. At first, it looked like the affable Levitt might be miscast, considering these are supposed to be bad-ass, all-business dreamweavers, but anyone who has seen the unheralded indie noir "Brick" knows he can do "edgy." Tom Hardy ("RocknRolla") steals the show as the wisecracking "forger" Eames, however. The lone weak spot seems to be Ellen Page, whose dry-wit delivery is wasted here. Even then, it's not a matter of her turning in a bad performance; it's just one that any actress could have done.
Of course, in the end, it's all about story, and Nolan more than delivers a fresh take on an old concept. The final act is like watching someone play one of those multi-tiered chess games - your mind has to be focused on three levels at once. The one knock is that Nolan the director allows Nolan the screenwriter too much exposition about Cobb's wife (Marion Cotillard), dragging out the running time to an almost unmanageable 148 minutes. It's a minor complaint, though, in the face of Nolan's brilliant assemblage of sound, visuals and stunts.
The 411: Many think that Christopher Nolan is the filmmaker of the last decade, and with films like "Inception" it's hard to argue. This is a director who has not only done his homework on the classics, but he incorporates those ideas without it feeling like empty navel-gazing for the film school crowd. "Iron Man 2" might be more of a 'rollicking good time,' but "Inception" is the best film so far this year, and it's one that will require multiple viewings to unweave the tapestry that Nolan has woven. Or you can just come back for the bad-ass hallway fight.
Posted By: The Great Capt. Smooth (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 03:38 PM
Best movie i have seen in years
Posted By: Cody (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 03:47 PM
Sooo....how 'bout dat best of Raw disc 3?
Posted By: Steve (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 03:57 PM
Interesting to note that once again in a Nolan film, the lead female role falls flat. Is it that he can't seem to cast the right actress? Or maybe he has trouble directing them? I don't know.
Posted By: Jim Rome (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 04:04 PM
que steve to comment on this
Posted By: Guest#2334 (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 04:07 PM
Glad you didn't give this shitfest a 10. Nolan is a poor man's Kubrick, except none of his movies are original in anyway.
Any hack with a big budget can use his little CGI tricks.
Posted By: PT Anderson (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 04:19 PM
Nolan fears casting hispanics.
Posted By: Truth (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 04:23 PM
Wow, that poster looks a lot like that Dark Knight poster where the Joker has his back turned to the camera and Gotham City is in front of him. Such creativity.
That said, I will be seeing this movie. It looks damn good.
Posted By: Zingy (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 04:24 PM
Easily the best movie this year. Might not be everyone's cup of tea, but it's refreshing to see such a original. well made movie. With all the remake, reboot and unoriginal movies these days, Inception is one of these true gems that will become a classic for the years to come.
Posted By: Bane (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 04:24 PM
Just came back from seeing it..IT WAS AMAZING!! Its about time I went to a movie theater and I didn't have to leave my brain with the usher. Great review to a great movie.
Posted By: Cotti (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 04:27 PM
Saw it last night - words do not do it justice. See it now...
Posted By: Mario (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 04:44 PM
is the poster intentionally ripping off the dark knight poster with the joker?
Posted By: Riggs (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 04:56 PM
i didnt even realize the length of the film. it is a complete mind blower. there are a few films i have seen multiple times in the theaters. this has just joined that exclusive list.
Posted By: rey (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 04:57 PM
Thank you so much for both understanding and conveying how superb this movie is. My only tiny gripe with the review is about Ellen Page. Sure, the performance could have been done by (almost) any other actress, but the important part about Ellen is her likability. In that sense maybe it comes down to your individual view of her, but the role demands someone incredibly likable, to suspend our collective disbelief (which isn't hard when you're so very lost for much of the film) and help us relate to her, as in a lot of ways we ARE her since she is being introduced to these concepts just as we are. Other than that, totally amazing review for what is now without a doubt one of my top 5 favorite movies of all time.
Posted By: James (Registered) (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 05:10 PM
Not so good of a review.
INCEPTION marks film inspiration as a unique revolutionary film spined by the brilliant storytelling CHRISTOPHER NOLAN unravels. As the latest Christopher Nolan film, Inception is undoubtedly his best original work yet. Fans anticipating Inception with be more than satisfied experiencing this breathtaking film as it will become an exciting classic you will want to re-watch over and over again.
The cast in this film delivers such pure talent. Every cast member gives you a natural feel for who the characters truly are helping you to connect how separate motives tie into this maze of a story. Dom Cobb (Leonardo DiCaprio) is a highly skilled thief that steals valuable secrets deep with the subconscious during the dream state. The bulk of this corporate espionage is his chance at redemption. In order for Cobb to get his life back, he has to assemble a team of specialists to successfully perform the impossible-inception.
The cinematography in this film is remarkable the whole way through. Every structure and background appears real with no effects. This makes it evident to understand why and how these characters may at times have such difficulty differentiating between what reality they perceive to currently be experiencing.
Any film with a heavy dream basis is expected to have stunning mind bending transitions in and out of alternate realities which this film delivers with an extra kick. With a lengthy runtime of 148 minutes, Inception lacks any moment where the film feels its dragging itself onward. Every single scene in this film is an entertaining crucial part of this intriguing puzzle.
NOLAN has written and directed yet another universal story that flows appropriately giving the audience exactly what they need to know and more importantly exactly when they need to know it. This film is a must-see as it sets the bar extremely high for all filmmakers.
Posted By: Kevin Mac (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 05:12 PM
Hey Jim Rome, call me Chris on more time...
Since we're talking about dreams, I thought it might fit..
And inception was the biggest waste of time and money since that stupid Dark Knight film came out. What a waste.
Posted By: Jim Everett (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 05:20 PM
Glad you didn't give this shitfest a 10. Nolan is a poor man's Kubrick, except none of his movies are original in anyway.
Any hack with a big budget can use his little CGI tricks.
Posted By: PT Anderson (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 04:19 PM
looks like your the only one who thought it was a shit fest. Since everybody in the movie theater i went too i heard a lot of people saying they loved it on the way out. Yes it is a bit long. But i didn't mind that since the story telling was original. The only one that seemed out of place was Ellen page and i agree with Jd Dunn. Oh by the way we miss your wrestling dvd reviews
Posted By: Guest#6774 (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 05:46 PM
I'd say it's a 6. You see all the plot twists coming a mile away. Nolan's like the new M.Night, except Dark Knight isn't as good as most of Shamalalmadingdong's best efforts.
Overrated movie, no doubt. I will say that DiCaprio gets big points for being able to act through a lot of nonsense and keep the film together.
More or less like Shutter Island. I'll call it "Shutter in the City".
Posted By: Guest#6345 (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 05:56 PM
the best suspense film i've ever seen. Its surprising how no other movie has gone to the realm of the dream and back. this is the first movie that made me think about the concept for hours. Loved everything about, this is 10x better than avatar.
Posted By: wooooaaaaahhhhh (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 06:05 PM
I'm looking forward to seeing this and even more so after the review. Sadly, my sentiments of Nolan are correct when it comes to female roles. It appears that he doesn't know how to write or direct for them as a majority of his stories don't have strong females. It's nothing against him because a flaw as minor as that doesn't take away from the great films he's done. Can't wait to see it!
Posted By: Steveberman1022 (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 06:12 PM
With all due respect, Mr. Dunn, Ellen Page was the "Architect," not an Extractor in training. She only went with them due to her knowing Cobb's secrets.
Posted By: picky (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 06:13 PM
Nolan fears casting hispanics.
Posted By: Truth (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 04:23 PM
Not true at all. The mayor in TDK is Cuban.
Posted By: Jatzel Roman (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 06:14 PM
Inception was a convoluted mess, full of unnatural expositions and gaping logic gaps, but it was incredibly entertaining.
It was certainly a good evening entertainment, but I've rarely come across a film so hard to explain yet so tragically predictable.
Switch your brain off and enjoy the feast.
Posted By: David Hayter (Registered) on July 17, 2010 at 06:27 PM
I haven't wanted to rush back to the theater to see a movie after already seeing it since The Dark Knight, hm, another Nolan film. Imagine that..
Posted By: Guest#6536 (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 06:40 PM
Just seen it today, didnt seem like 148mins to me and i took my 9 year old son also and he didnt complain about the time either!!! Good Movie
Posted By: yar (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 06:46 PM
This is a good film and well worth seeing, but I thought it fell short of being great.
The Shyamalan comparison is interesting, because if M Night had put out this exact same movie it would have been torn to shreds for being bloated, pretentious, and preposterous. Nolan has built up enough goodwill that people are approaching this with an open mind.
There are films that are clever, and films that try too hard to be clever. It felt like it was trying too hard and was needlessly convoluted. There were some odd scene choices, too. The final scene in the arctic is a mess. The "good guys" and swarms of "bad guys" wear very similar full-body gear and it's hard to tell them apart, let alone tell which character is which. It was really depersonalizing and I found it hard to care about what happened.
But hey, I still enjoyed it. There are fantastic visuals throughout, some likable characters, and it's fun when the parts that made no sense 10 minutes before are suddenly perfectly clear.
Posted By: Dr Insanity (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 07:19 PM
Absolutely loved it! Best movie I've seen in a LONG time.
Posted By: kmc (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 07:26 PM
Hey Jim Rome, call me Chris on more time...
Since we're talking about dreams, I thought it might fit..
And inception was the biggest waste of time and money since that stupid Dark Knight film came out. What a waste.
Posted By: Jim Everett (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 05:20 PM
I also wanted to say, I like to troll and just try to sound like a dumb@$$ when my mommie lets me play on the computer geeheehee.
Posted By: Jim Everett (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 07:59 PM
The haters will try to find anything to nitpick. The fact is that this film is absolutely mindblowing...dramatic, intense, intelligent, plenty of action and an awesome story to boot. One of the greatest films I've seen in the last decade or maybe even longer. Truly amazing.
Posted By: Erik... (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 08:13 PM
i dont think iron man 2 should be compared to this movie
Posted By: Guest#1118 (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 08:51 PM
" if M Night had put out this exact same movie it would have been torn to shreds for being bloated, pretentious, and preposterous. "
No, if M Night had put out a film this well crafted he could have redeemed himself as a director after the shit fests that he's poured out for over half a decade.
Instead, he gives us the worst big-budget abomination since Revenge of the Fallen
Posted By: COTD (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 08:56 PM
i dont think iron man 2 should be compared to this movie
Posted By: Guest#8913 (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 08:59 PM
Sooo... wait a minute, J.D. You're a wrestling fan, a fellow cWo-ite, AND you're familiar with Anais Nin?!
You're the man!
Posted By: rkmtwin (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 09:25 PM
I literally just got back after seeing about an hour ago. Definitly the best film so far this year. Nolan's one of the few film directors that treats his audience like intellects capable of unraveling the films mystery without needing it to spelled out for them. The film has so many layers and plot points that are woven together so seamlessly that the true complexity of the film is masked. Very few directors could make that movie.
Posted By: J.J.T. (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 09:47 PM
Great movies cant end so weak, to much of a let down it killed the rest of the film. So it was just good, the acting is what excelled in this film and the guy who stood out the most was JGL he has the acting chops and the look to replace Heath ledger as the JOKER make it happen Nolan!
Posted By: pikey(guest) (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 10:31 PM
Inception was a convoluted mess, full of unnatural expositions and gaping logic gaps, but it was incredibly entertaining.
-Posted by someone, or something
Gaping logic gaps? Name one. I dare you. That goes for anybody. I'll meet you back here to show you that you are wrong.
Posted By: James (Registered) (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 11:10 PM
And to the guy who asked if the poster is a rip off of the Dark Knight poster..... Really?! How can somebody rip off their own movie? It might be an homage, or just a style that the guy likes. Not to mention movies tend to have multiple posters. Dark Knight had at least 4. In summation, learn yourself some logic.
Posted By: James (Registered) (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 11:22 PM
Actresses in Nolan films is an interesting point of discussion. Insomnia is the only wide-released Nolan film I've never seen, so I can't judge Hilary Swank's performance.
So on to the rest.
Carrie-Anne Moss, Memento: so-so.
Katie Holmes, Batman Begins: let's not go there.
Scarlett Johansson/Rebecca Hall, The Prestige: I barely remember Johansson's performance. Hall was OK as Christian Bale's tortured wife.
Maggie Gyllenhaal, The Dark Knight: Asterisk. If she was Rachel Dawes in the first film she would have been a lot better. But she did a decent job inheriting the role.
Ellen Page/Marion Cotillard, Inception:
Page had a tough role to fill as "The Girl" in this merry band. She had to be the emotional counterweight to DiCaprio's tortured, uncompromising character. On this part, she did fine. I think Ariadne represents innocence in this film; the other team members are all but corrupted by their work.
Cotillard was downright scary. As Mal, she represented Dom's repressed guilt just clawing to get out. And she did a fantastic job. I'm so happy she stuck with her natural French accent and didn't try to fake one like in "Public Enemies."
Posted By: Erick (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 11:41 PM
Shyamalan has no real success or experience working with an ensemble cast of major characters as large as what Nolan's worked with in "Inception", "The Dark Knight" or "Batman Begins". I think, to be honest, "Inception" may have had the largest number of characters to keep track of in any Nolan film to date.
"Airbender" flopped not only because of that, but also it was trying entirely too hard to start a completely separate fan base from the cartoon series. The trailers made it look too serious, so fans of the original series just stayed away.
Posted By: Erick (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 11:45 PM
The ending was SWEET!!!!
Posted By: Kyle (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 11:51 PM
Came in here to say I too just saw this masterpiece... it was great and was the first movie in a long time that I have immediately wanted to go back and see it again. Great job by Leo and the rest of the cast! Great job Nolan!
Posted By: Guest#3441 (Guest) on July 18, 2010 at 01:02 AM
This movie was a good movie.
Posted By: Every Day Drive (Guest) on July 18, 2010 at 01:08 AM
amazing movie. and i say it tipped!
Posted By: Points OFF! (Guest) on July 18, 2010 at 02:19 AM
Glad you didn't give this shitfest a 10. Nolan is a poor man's Kubrick, except none of his movies are original in anyway.
Any hack with a big budget can use his little CGI tricks.
Posted By: PT Anderson (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 04:19 PM
Guess you'll be blown away then when you watch Following which was the exact opposite of the big budget film.
Posted By: Guest#6095 (Guest) on July 18, 2010 at 03:56 AM
SPOILER
JD DUNN TURNS HELL 2NYT!!!!!!!
Posted By: The 3rd man (Guest) on July 18, 2010 at 04:47 AM
I'm looking forward to this, but I honestly think Paul Thomas Anderson is the best director currently making films anywhere in the world. The fact that the general populace don't get his films only proves my point.
Posted By: Ebert Jr (Guest) on July 18, 2010 at 05:08 AM
J.D. I was wondering if you saw a lot of influence from Blade Runner in this film. The ending I thought had a connection but also thematically and stylistically.
It seemed like there was a lot of that movie and Craven's New Nightmare in this film.
Posted By: seaneb14 (Guest) on July 18, 2010 at 05:37 AM
"i dont think iron man 2 should be compared to this movie
Posted By: Guest#8913 (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 08:59 PM"
I agree 100 %, Iron Man 2 had a strong female lead, a linear storyline, and was an authorized retelling of someone else's story.
While Inception had a female lead that might as well have been a cardboard movie standee, a haphazard re-hash of the movie "Dreamscape", liberally splashed with popular element styles from recent popular films [Matrix-esque fights, the destruction "peeling" of streets from "War of the Worlds", liberally wrapped in elegant CG goodness to hide all the "homage" work [read: outright theft.].
Nolan is the next George Lucas all right...I just wish either of them were more original.
Posted By: TheGuy (Guest) on July 18, 2010 at 09:14 AM
"J.D. I was wondering if you saw a lot of influence from Blade Runner in this film. The ending I thought had a connection but also thematically and stylistically."
I notice a lot of the Scott brothers' influence in Nolan's work, but I didn't think of Blade Runner specifically until you mentioned it. You're right, though.
"With all due respect, Mr. Dunn, Ellen Page was the "Architect," not an Extractor in training. She only went with them due to her knowing Cobb's secrets."
True in a technical sense, but everyone on Cobb's team would be considered an extractor, the same way that lock-picker in a gang of bank thieves would still be considered a thief. I suppose, if you wanted to argue, she'd be an inceptor-in-training.
The point is, she's learning a valuable life-skill that she can put on her resume.
Posted By: J.D. Dunn (Registered) on July 18, 2010 at 09:39 AM
Movie was amazing.
Posted By: Ant-LOX (Guest) on July 18, 2010 at 10:05 AM
I watched this last night and think it is a masterpiece. I think to say Ellen Page's Ariadne character is wasted is not doing her role justice. She was the architect also, not the extractor but may be eventually. She asks alot of the questions many of us in the audience are thinking and seems to be a voice of reason in all the chaos. This movie was outstanding and I believe even better than Dark Knight which while the greatest comic book adaptation ever still had a couple of flaws. Christopher Nolan is the best director and along with his brother possibly the best screen-writer working right now.
Posted By: mj (Guest) on July 18, 2010 at 10:36 AM
"Nolan fears casting hispanics.
Posted By: Truth (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 04:23 PM
Not true at all. The mayor in TDK is Cuban."
Maybe so. In which case I offer the hypothesis that Nolan fears casting blondes.
Posted By: Loki (Guest) on July 18, 2010 at 10:58 AM
You Nolan fanboys are pathetic.
"OMG he made a decent movie about Batman, let's overrate everything he does because he is gawd~!!!~!"
Posted By: lol (Guest) on July 18, 2010 at 11:05 AM
"i dont think iron man 2 should be compared to this movie
Posted By: Guest#8913 (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 08:59 PM"
I agree 100 %, Iron Man 2 had a strong female lead, a linear storyline, and was an authorized retelling of someone else's story.
While Inception had a female lead that might as well have been a cardboard movie standee, a haphazard re-hash of the movie "Dreamscape", liberally splashed with popular element styles from recent popular films [Matrix-esque fights, the destruction "peeling" of streets from "War of the Worlds", liberally wrapped in elegant CG goodness to hide all the "homage" work [read: outright theft.].
Nolan is the next George Lucas all right...I just wish either of them were more original.
Posted By: TheGuy (Guest) on July 18, 2010 at 09:14 AM
Oh sweet jesus SHUT THE FUCK UP! I'm so sick of people saying it's a Dreamscape ripoff! The only thing it has in common with Dreamscape is actually entering people's dreams. THAT'S IT! Freddy Krueger did the same, and actually killed people in the dreams like in Dreamscape...is Dreamscape ripping off Nightmare on Elm Street?? You're a fucking moron. Inception was an incredible film with a truly original story. Go fuck yourself.
Posted By: Oh My! (Guest) on July 18, 2010 at 11:10 AM
Wow, that poster looks a lot like that Dark Knight poster where the Joker has his back turned to the camera and Gotham City is in front of him. Such creativity.
That said, I will be seeing this movie. It looks damn good.
Posted By: Zingy (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 04:24 PM
I was going to post the exact same thing but I was hoping someone else noticed too. haha
Posted By: D-MoB (Guest) on July 18, 2010 at 11:22 AM
Its surprising how no other movie has gone to the realm of the dream and back.
Posted By: wooooaaaaahhhhh (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 06:05 PM
I guess you're forgetting The Cell then, a movie equally visually impressive and with a better narrative to boot. And if this is the best suspense film you've ever seen I suggest you look up one Alfred Hitchcock immediately my pedigree chum.
Posted By: No, I'm Ironman. (Guest) on July 18, 2010 at 01:55 PM
"Nolan fears casting hispanics.
Posted By: Truth (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 04:23 PM
Not true at all. The mayor in TDK is Cuban."
Maybe so. In which case I offer the hypothesis that Nolan fears casting blondes.
Posted By: Loki (Guest) on July 18, 2010 at 10:58 AM
Uh... Guy Pearce?
Posted By: James (Registered) (Guest) on July 18, 2010 at 03:00 PM
To those with such harsh words for my film, please remember it would be rude for me to show up at Safeway and comment on the way you bag groceries.
Posted By: C. Nolan (Guest) on July 18, 2010 at 03:14 PM
I agree 100 %, Iron Man 2 had a strong female lead, a linear storyline, and was an authorized retelling of someone else's story.
While Inception had a female lead that might as well have been a cardboard movie standee, a haphazard re-hash of the movie "Dreamscape", liberally splashed with popular element styles from recent popular films [Matrix-esque fights, the destruction "peeling" of streets from "War of the Worlds", liberally wrapped in elegant CG goodness to hide all the "homage" work [read: outright theft.].
Nolan is the next George Lucas all right...I just wish either of them were more original.
Posted By: TheGuy (Guest) on July 18, 2010 at 09:14 AM
If he's the next George Lucas, you must be one of the legion of nerds that hates anything popular and thinks it sucks just because the mainstream likes it or it's a sequel to something.
I definitely have to see this movie now. I didn't like the Star Wars OT as much as others did, but they are fun movies. The PT were actually better from almost every standpoint except nostalgia (duh), and people whined, but they were also very solid movies (III especially).
Posted By: Guest#9257 (Guest) on July 18, 2010 at 06:03 PM
Sounds good but if it is the best movie this year so far, I am glad I've been missing a lot of movies...
Posted By: Guest#0112 (Guest) on July 18, 2010 at 06:09 PM
"Nolan fears casting hispanics.
Posted By: Truth (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 04:23 PM
Not true at all. The mayor in TDK is Cuban."
Maybe so. In which case I offer the hypothesis that Nolan fears casting blondes.
Posted By: Loki (Guest) on July 18, 2010 at 10:58 AM
Uh... Guy Pearce?
Posted By: James (Registered) (Guest) on July 18, 2010 at 03:00 PM
Uh...Heath Ledger and Scarlett Johansonn
Posted By: Erik... (Guest) on July 18, 2010 at 06:35 PM
The poster could be FORESHADOWING the next Joker......could be, this is Nolan, a master of his craft and obviously a guy who loves movies, he sees the big picture
Posted By: Adni (Guest) on July 18, 2010 at 09:44 PM
All I can say about this movie is DAMN. this was one of the best movies I have seen period.
Posted By: Impressed (Guest) on July 18, 2010 at 10:22 PM
Uh... Guy Pearce?
Posted By: James (Registered) (Guest) on July 18, 2010 at 03:00 PM
Uh...Heath Ledger and Scarlett Johansonn
Posted By: Erik... (Guest) on July 18, 2010 at 06:35 PM
Yeah them too, I just have an epic attachment to Memento. Also, many characters in Following could be blond and we just don't know it. Oh Nolan, you're a genius ;)
Posted By: James (Registered) (Guest) on July 19, 2010 at 12:07 AM
I didn't like the Star Wars OT as much as others did, but they are fun movies. The PT were actually better from almost every standpoint except nostalgia (duh), and people whined, but they were also very solid movies (III especially).
Posted By: Guest#9257 (Guest) on July 18, 2010 at 06:03 PM
Correction: The original trilogy had a heart, as it had inter-character relationships that developed through natural on-screen chemistry and not because a hair-brained plot said they needed to further the plot with emotionless exposition.
Posted By: James (Registered) (Guest) on July 19, 2010 at 12:10 AM
Hey Jim Rome, call me Chris on more time...
Since we're talking about dreams, I thought it might fit..
And inception was the biggest waste of time and money since that stupid Dark Knight film came out. What a waste.
Posted By: Jim Everett (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 05:20 PM
Shut up, Chrissy.
Posted By: Mick Dundee (Guest) on July 19, 2010 at 06:10 AM
I enjoy reading comments and reviews where people bash on this movie simply because it was too smart for them. That's saying alot since this movie was smart, but not mind-bending smart.
The idea is original, you can challenge certain parts have been ripped off or whatever, but the film as a whole is borderline masterpiece. The cast was strong all around, the film's pacing was exceptional, and it was a thoroughly fun ride from start to finish.
Nolan is quickly becoming one of the best in the business. He is not a poor man's Kubrick, he is himself and is damn good at what he does.
I highly recommend this film to anyone who appreciates good cinema as this is THE must-see movie of the year and front-runner for best picture by a mile.
9.8 out of 10.
Posted By: MPMoore (Guest) on July 19, 2010 at 09:34 AM
man, christopher nolan is the most overrated filmmaker since james cameron...they're freaking OVERRATED!
Posted By: avatardarkknightsuck (Guest) on July 19, 2010 at 01:37 PM
The Mayor in The Dark Knight is not Cuban...
He's Bat Manuel!
Posted By: Ser Drake (Guest) on July 19, 2010 at 01:56 PM
I can't believe the whole thing was in Leo's head the whole time and that he was really in a prisoner camp in pst-WWII Germany!!!!!!!!!
Posted By: Guest#9144 (Guest) on July 19, 2010 at 02:43 PM
man, christopher nolan is the most overrated filmmaker since james cameron...they're freaking OVERRATED!
Posted By: avatardarkknightsuck (Guest) on July 19, 2010 at 01:37 PM
Uhh . . . yeah, James Cameron is overrated, the guy who made the two highest grossing of all time and actually the disaster Piranha decent is overrated? Where are you from?
Nolan, overrated? Insomnia, Memento, this is the guy that gave Batman the movies it always deserved. Yeah? He's overrated too.
Let me guess, next, you're going to say that Keanu Reeves is a better actor than Dicaprio?
Posted By: Elevenseven (Guest) on July 19, 2010 at 02:44 PM
"Airbender" flopped not only because of that, but also it was trying entirely too hard to start a completely separate fan base from the cartoon series. The trailers made it look too serious, so fans of the original series just stayed away.
Posted By: Erick (Guest) on July 17, 2010 at 11:45 PM
That and I hear they didn't even say Ang at all through the whole movie. Everybody seems to hate Airbender from the fans to the people just going to see it. Atleast with the Twilight crap the hardcore fans are sitting in there getting wet the entire time and think its somewhat like the books.
Inception kicked ass and I would have no issues watching it over. Shitbags can't come up with this kind of stuff so they bash this then return to writing fan fiction that involves Spider-Man having sex with the dead corpse of Superman while also shooting his webs into Jean Grey and Wonder Womans ass and pussy.
Posted By: Guest#3791 (Guest) on July 19, 2010 at 07:25 PM
man, christopher nolan is the most overrated filmmaker since james cameron...they're freaking OVERRATED!
Posted By: avatardarkknightsuck (Guest) on July 19, 2010 at 01:37 PM
Great argument. Moron.
Posted By: Erik... (Guest) on July 20, 2010 at 02:43 AM
The great thing about this movie is that it shouldn't have worked-on almost any level-but it does. The tension and build is where Nolan excels.
The movie isn't perfect, because from the beginning the viewer is almost trained to start looking for answers and some of the plot surprises (if they were intended that way) were easier to call. It is a long movie, but rarely feels that way. The performance of the actors took a backseat to the story, in my view, but the actors all managed to pull this complex story off.
This movie has stunning visuals (especially the scene where Page folds the city over on top of itself), a great score, a complex, tortured protagonist, and a great story and ending.
You have to admire how Nolan pulled it off, because a movie this stuffed should have been a complete cluster.
Posted By: Cory (Guest) on July 20, 2010 at 11:15 AM
I walked out of Inception a little over half way into the movie because I was still TRYING to care about the characters & the plot--& still didn't. That's the number one rule of movie-making--to get the audience involved.
The special effects were interesting but the thin, silly, & contrived plot didn't hold my interest--the premise had way too many holes that required you to withold reason to the point of poor writing--it barely made sense at all & after trying to work with it for over an hour, you finally give up caring. I found myself wondering how the actors could keep a straight face while pretending this holey fluff is real.
It just didn't cut the mustard as a movie & I believe the high-falutin' critics are over-thinking the entire thing, afraid they'll be the only ones not "smart" enough to see the movie's "enduring value".
Plus, I love Dicaprio as an actor & I wanted to enjoy the movie but I was disappointed. The wife bit reminded me of a repeat of Shutter Island--another disappointment.
Special effects strung together does not a movie make--much less a ground-breaking movie.
Posted By: Charlene (Guest) on July 23, 2010 at 02:34 PM
"I walked out of Inception a little over half way into the movie because I was still TRYING to care about the characters & the plot--& still didn't. That's the number one rule of movie-making--to get the audience involved.
The special effects were interesting but the thin, silly, & contrived plot didn't hold my interest--the premise had way too many holes that required you to withold reason to the point of poor writing--it barely made sense at all & after trying to work with it for over an hour, you finally give up caring. I found myself wondering how the actors could keep a straight face while pretending this holey fluff is real.
It just didn't cut the mustard as a movie & I believe the high-falutin' critics are over-thinking the entire thing, afraid they'll be the only ones not "smart" enough to see the movie's "enduring value".
Plus, I love Dicaprio as an actor & I wanted to enjoy the movie but I was disappointed. The wife bit reminded me of a repeat of Shutter Island--another disappointment.
Special effects strung together does not a movie make--much less a ground-breaking movie.
Posted By: Charlene (Guest) on July 23, 2010 at 02:34 PM"
I find it funny that someone discusses holes in a film's plot after admitting to missing the last HALF of the movie.
Did the remaining half of the film close any plot gaps? Maybe, maybe not. But prove to me that they didn't.
I should have walked out half way through your comment.
Posted By: Bouche Dag (Guest) on July 31, 2010 at 04:13 PM
Copyright (c) 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.