www.411mania.com
|  News |  Film Reviews |  Columns |  DVD/Other Reviews |  News Report |
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// Holly Henderson Puts Her Big Boobs On Display While Sucking On Ice Cream Cone
MUSIC
// Katy Perry Rocks Tight Dress & Shows Off Cleavage In NYC
WRESTLING
// WWE Suspends Chris Jericho
POLITICS
// Just Say No to the Police Using Drones
MMA
// 411's MMA Roundtable - UFC 146: Dos Santos vs. Mir
GAMES
// New Transformers: Fall of Cybertron Featurette


MOVIE REVIEW  MOVIE REVIEWS
//  What to Expect When You're Expecting Review
//  Battleship Review [2]
//  Battleship Review
//  Dark Shadows Review
//  The Dictator Review
//  The Raven Review
 HOT MOVIES
//  The Dark Knight Rises
//  The Avengers
//  Prometheus
//  The Amazing Spider-Man
//  Iron Man 3
//  The Hobbit
SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds





Follow 411mania on Twitter!




Add 411 On Facebook
 



 
 411mania » Movies » Film Reviews



Advertisement
Paranormal Activity 3 Review
Posted by Nolan Woodford on 10.23.2011





Dennis: Christopher Nicholas Smith
Julie: Lauren Bittner
Young Katie: Chloe Csengery
Young Kristi: Jessica Tyler Brown
Randy: Dustin Ingram
Katie: Katie Featherson
Kristi: Sprague Grayden

Paramount Pictures presents a film directed by Ariel Schulman and Henry Joost. Written by Christopher B. Landon. Based off of characters created by Oren Peli.
Rated R for some violence, language, brief sexuality and drug use
Running Time: 1 hour, 25 minutes
Release Date: October 21, 2011

When your life is being threatened by some sort of supernatural force, at what point do you put down the video camera? For the extended family of those haunted in the Paranormal Activity series, the answer is never. As the franchise continues to be milked for the tens of millions of dollars it is sure to haul in at the box office, the notion that this is "found footage" becomes more and more preposterous. While I'm sure fans will argue that you're supposed to suspend disbelief in that regard, isn't the whole point that you're supposed to kind of think this may be real? Isn't that why the original was such a hit in the first place?

Paranormal Activity 3 is an origin story, taking place in 1988 when the two sisters haunted in the first two films were about six years old. Their mother (Bittner) is living with her boyfriend (Smith), who shoots wedding video and has an affinity for recording every little thing. After capturing something that he thinks may be a spirit while trying to make a homemade sex tape, Dennis immediately insists on keeping cameras running nearly 24/7 throughout the house. The "spirit" doesn't look like anything more than some particles falling from the ceiling during an earthquake. But it's enough for Dennis to devote his every free waking moment to the idea that the house could be haunted.

If you've seen either of the previous installments in the Paranormal Activity series (and if you haven't, why would you want to see this one?) you know how this is going to work. The spirit involved begins to slowly let its presence be known in the house by moving a door or breaking a light bulb. Since there is always at least one person in the house - in this case, the mother - who is convinced that their house isn't possessed, the spirit will do a little bit more as the nights progress until it can no longer be ignored. I won't spoil any of the actual "activity", but the fact that someone with access to these videos would find some of these events to be little more than a hoax is preposterous.

A fair number of the events are captured on the directors' favorite gimmick, a videocamera mounted to an oscillating fan motor that goes back and forth between the living room and kitchen. This allows for some events to be seen and not heard, which I will not argue with. It also allows for a lot of time to be spent panning across a brick column to help fill the barely-feature-length 78 minutes from when the film starts to when the credits roll.

That doesn't mean Paranormal Activity 3 needs to be any longer than it is. As with previous installments, not a lot happens until the last ten or fifteen minutes of the movie. Before its climax, the only scares are cheap and temporary. The legit "thrills" are no scarier than when someone jumps out to spook Dennis and make fun of his suspicions. By the time the film does reach its conclusion, you'll likely have more questions than answers. Perhaps they're being saved for Paranormal Activity 4 and another $12.00 movie ticket.

I haven't particularly enjoyed any of the Paranormal Activity films, but I understood the appeal of the original. Perhaps if I didn't find its main characters to be so unlikeable (especially Micah, who made me side with the demon) I would've been able to be more spooked. The formula has not changed one iota from the first to the third, taking away any of the "What if this is real?" appeal of the original. I don't blame Paramount for going back to the well every October, though. These films have made a killing at the box office, and this will surely be no exception. (It wasn't until Saw VI that fans truly started to give up on that franchise.) Had a few F-Bombs been left out, Paranormal Activity 3 should've garnered a PG-13 rating, ensuring an even bigger box office return. Perhaps the R rating makes it seem scarier.

Follow 411 Movies on Twitter @411Movies. Follow Nolan Woodford on Twitter @TeamACW.


The 411: If you've seen one Paranormal Activity movie, you've pretty much seen them all. The third installment in the franchise stays true to its formula, which is one that I feel lacks the content and thrills to fill a feature-length motion picture. Any mystique the original had has long since dissipated, but that doesn't mean Paranormal Activity 4 isn't hitting theaters in October 2012. If you have to keep seeing these movies, they should only be seen in theaters with a large audience. Having a crowd to yell and speculate with is a must to pass the time.
 
Final Score:  4.0   [ Poor ]  legend


Post Comment (17)  |  Email Nolan Woodford  |  View Nolan Woodford's 411 Profile

  Send To Friend  |    Stumble It!  |    Digg It!  | 



Please add your comment below.
If you are registered, you can login and post under your registered name. If not, you can post as a guest or register.

* Please note that 411 moderates all comments. Your comment will show up on the site after it has been approved by an editor.
 
Name : 
Comment : 
Remaining Characters : 
2800
 

Comments (17)

 
The first two movies were so fucking boring and weren't scary at all. Only time I jumped in PE1 was when the dude flew at the camera at the end and the only time I jumped in PE2 was when the bird hit the window. I dont understand why these movies are so popular. Its only a matter of time before this becomes the Saw franchise and Paranormal Activity 7: The Final Chapter 3D hits theaters October 2015 with a clusterfuck story and plot holes galore disparately trying to cling to any part of the first two stories to justify it being a "sequel".

Posted By: Guest#7933 (Guest)  on October 23, 2011 at 01:18 AM

 
 
Really disagree. And your very first complaint is "at what point do you put the camera down?" Thats like asking in a horror movie "at what point do you not go investigate that spooky noise?" It's part of the genre.

I for one appreciate the slow build of these movies. I hate when a horror movies needs to throw scary scenes at us every 10 seconds (American Horror Story comes to mind in that). The slow builds I feel builds tension so when shit really does hit the fan you are even totally along for the ride.

But if you go in expecting to not like it (like it sounds like you did) and not going along with it then I imagine you wouldn't find it scary at all. Much like a Halloween Haunted House, if you go in laughing at everything how can you blame the Haunted House for not being scary?


Posted By: EricG (Guest)  on October 23, 2011 at 01:38 AM

 
 
I agree that the formula has gone stale, but I still thought it was OK, i give it a respectable 6.5, I wasnt really scared at all, the second one did scare me and I think its still the best in the series, if they do go with a 4th one then I hope they write a better script.

Posted By: Henry K (Guest)  on October 23, 2011 at 02:41 AM

 
 
Bloody Mary?

Posted By: Aenimem (Guest)  on October 23, 2011 at 07:39 AM

 
 
They should've handed out Depends before people went into the theater.

Posted By: The Great Capt. Smooth (Guest)  on October 23, 2011 at 08:30 AM

 
 
The "spirit" didn't look anything like the particles falling from the ceiling. It was the dust landing on an invisible being. It was an obvious thing that happened, yet you completely missed it.

Posted By: Guest#1100 (Guest)  on October 23, 2011 at 10:03 AM

 
 
"The "spirit" didn't look anything like the particles falling from the ceiling. It was the dust landing on an invisible being. It was an obvious thing that happened, yet you completely missed it.

Posted By: Guest#1100 (Guest) on October 23, 2011 at 10:03 AM"

That doesn't exonerate the movie from being crap.


Posted By: Aenimem (Guest)  on October 23, 2011 at 10:30 AM

 
 
I would give it a 6 or 7. It was decent, but easily the worst of the 3 and it's obvious they are running out of ideas. What theater charges $12.00 for a ticket? Wow!

Posted By: JM (Guest)  on October 23, 2011 at 10:38 AM

 
 
Really disagree. And your very first complaint is "at what point do you put the camera down?" Thats like asking in a horror movie "at what point do you not go investigate that spooky noise?" It's part of the genre.

I for one appreciate the slow build of these movies. I hate when a horror movies needs to throw scary scenes at us every 10 seconds (American Horror Story comes to mind in that). The slow builds I feel builds tension so when shit really does hit the fan you are even totally along for the ride.

But if you go in expecting to not like it (like it sounds like you did) and not going along with it then I imagine you wouldn't find it scary at all. Much like a Halloween Haunted House, if you go in laughing at everything how can you blame the Haunted House for not being scary?

Posted By: EricG (Guest) on October 23, 2011 at 01:38 AM

Fair enough but it gets harder to get into these movies when it's the same shit every time more or less. Plus, the build-up to the scares isn't all that entertaining or interesting which makes it that much harder to immerse yourself so that you are capable of becoming genuinely scared by the end. Please note that I prefer slow build horror movies too but they only work if the characters are good, which they aren't, and the plot is creative and original, which this isn't anymore. This movie is worth seeing mainly for all the little high school kids who scream at everything on the screen. That's pretty funny.


Posted By: Alan (Guest)  on October 23, 2011 at 11:31 AM

 
 
I hated, hated, HATED this movie! There wasn't enough beautiful teenage girls getting chopped into pieces for the purpose of giving me an erection. Hollywood should SO make a movie based on my awesome fan fic instead.

Posted By: Mysogynist Gore Fag (Guest)  on October 23, 2011 at 11:55 AM

 
 
That seems to be the biggest problem in the majority of these horror films the last few years no really compelling or sympathetic characters.Everyone in them seems to be a complete and total ass and unlikable in any way shape or form.You felt for Gregory Peck in the Omen,Laurie Strode in the original Halloween was just a genuinely nice girl next door.Pretty much any character gets what they deserve in these recent movies.

Posted By: guest666 (Guest)  on October 23, 2011 at 01:51 PM

 
 
They should've handed out Depends before people went into the theater.

Posted By: The Great Capt. Smooth (Guest) on October 23, 2011 at 08:30 AM

yeah for when people die of boredom.


Posted By: Guest#7109 (Guest)  on October 23, 2011 at 02:29 PM

 
 
The "fan camera" is a brilliant idea! You'd see something in the living room, but the camera would be heading for the kitchen and you can't wait for the camera to go back to facing the living room! Such an easy way to build tension.

Posted By: The Great Capt. Smooth (Guest)  on October 23, 2011 at 05:06 PM

 
 
Another horror movie that makes some money so they make sequel after sequel. They're always crap.

Posted By: Ryan Haseldine (Guest)  on October 23, 2011 at 10:57 PM

 
 
That seems to be the biggest problem in the majority of these horror films the last few years no really compelling or sympathetic characters.Everyone in them seems to be a complete and total ass and unlikable in any way shape or form.You felt for Gregory Peck in the Omen,Laurie Strode in the original Halloween was just a genuinely nice girl next door.Pretty much any character gets what they deserve in these recent movies.

Bingo! This is why I enjoyed recent offerings like Insidious and Drag Me To Hell. Characters that one could actually like, and sympathize with stuck in terrifying circumstances.


Posted By: Jerry (Guest)  on October 25, 2011 at 01:36 AM

 
 
Of course, why wouldn't they keep making movies that cost about a grand to produce (and only because they have to pay the actors and crew because its a studio...someone could pretty easily make this for the cost of a camera and Adobe After Effects, with a cast of volunteers...which would probably be the same level of acting chops.) and people still shell out the money to see them over and over. They could easily edit these and put "the best of" all three into a half-hour tv special and it would be more entertaining than the films themselves.

Posted By: Guest#4263 (Guest)  on October 25, 2011 at 09:24 PM

 
 
Reviewer - "I haven't particularly enjoyed any of the Paranormal Activity films"

Then why the hell bother watching this one and writing a review? That's just dumb. I remember when I was a kid in the 80's, and Siskel and Ebert were still on TV. One week they reviewed something like Friday the 13th part IV, and I thought "if you know you're not going to like it, why waste all of our time with it?"

Same question applies here.


Posted By: Eric (Guest)  on November 06, 2011 at 12:10 PM

 


www.41mania.com
Copyright (c) 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.