www.411mania.com
|  News |  Film Reviews |  Columns |  DVD/Other Reviews |  News Report |
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// Holly Henderson Puts Her Big Boobs On Display While Sucking On Ice Cream Cone
MUSIC
// Katy Perry Rocks Tight Dress & Shows Off Cleavage In NYC
WRESTLING
// WWE Suspends Chris Jericho
POLITICS
// Just Say No to the Police Using Drones
MMA
// 411's MMA Roundtable - UFC 146: Dos Santos vs. Mir
GAMES
// New Transformers: Fall of Cybertron Featurette


MOVIE REVIEW  MOVIE REVIEWS
//  What to Expect When You're Expecting Review
//  Battleship Review [2]
//  Battleship Review
//  Dark Shadows Review
//  The Dictator Review
//  The Raven Review
 HOT MOVIES
//  The Dark Knight Rises
//  The Avengers
//  Prometheus
//  The Amazing Spider-Man
//  Iron Man 3
//  The Hobbit
SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds





Follow 411mania on Twitter!




Add 411 On Facebook
 



 
 411mania » Movies » Film Reviews



Advertisement
The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo Review
Posted by Jeremy Wilson on 12.29.2011



Directed by: David Fincher
Written by: Steven Zaillian
Based on the novel, Män som hatar kvinnor by: Steig Larsson

Mikael Blomkivst: Daniel Craig
Lisbeth Salander: Rooney Mara
Henrik Vanger: Christopher Plummer
Martin Vanger: Stellan Skarsgård
Erika Berger: Robin Wright
Dirch Frode: Steven Berkoff
Nils Bjurman: Yorick van Wageningen
Anita Vanger: Joely Richardson
Dragan Armansky: Goran Visnjic
Detective Morrell: Donald Sumpter

Rated R for brutal violent content including rape and torture, strong sexuality, graphic nudity, and language.
Running Time: 158 minutes



Adaptations are always tricky. Whether they be taken directly from literature or from earlier cinematic versions (or both), there are always people who cringe at the thought of another Hollywood cash grab diluting or ruining a beloved novel or foreign film. This was the case when Hollywood decided to release an American version of the beloved Swedish horror classic, Let The Right One In, a film beloved by film buffs and fanboys around the world. And while Matt Reeves' take on the film – Let Me In – was a fairly strong film in its own right, there was still a sense on audiences' part of “Was that really necessary?” The answer in that case was ultimately no; Reeves didn't expand on the original or do anything that eclipsed that first film's power and horror. The same cannot be said for the newest Swedish-to-American remake, The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, a new version of a Swedish film that came out about two years ago and was widely acclaimed in its own right. This time, however, the new version – the David Fincher version – not only justifies its own existence, but overtakes its predecessor with a bracing pace, a haunting and bold visual style and ultimately chilling take on the depths of evil to be found in human nature.

For those who have not read the massively popular bestselling novel by Swedish author Stieg Larsson, The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo tells the story of Mikael Blomkvist (Daniel Craig), a Swedish journalist who finds himself in legal trouble after he is set up into running a bogus story on a powerful businessman. Forced to step away from Millenium, the magazine he helped create, Blomkivst finds himself summoned to remote Hedestad, where aging business magnate Henrik Vanger (Christopher Plummer) and his family live. Henrik offers Mikael a job and much needed financial assitance; all he wants is for Mikael to attempt to uncover the truth about who murdered his great-niece Harriet over 40 years ago. The Vanger patriarch is convinced that one of his family members killed the girl and has been taunting him through the decades since, sending him pressed flowers every year for his birthday just like the girl used to do. Bloomkvist then embarks on an investigation into that fateful day on the island, diving into the details of the crime and timeline, as well as the lives and motives of the Vanger clan (some of whom happen to be unpleasant Nazis). In the process of all of this, Mikael requests a research assistant; Dirch Frode – Henrik's right-hand man – suggests the young lady who did the background investigation on Mikael for the elder Vanger. Thus, Mikael comes into contact with Lisbeth Salander; Mikael convinces her by asking her to help him “catch a killer of women.” The two then go about trying to uncover the truth surrounding the events of that day, how it relates to a series of killings across Sweden – and whether the killer is after them.

The first distinction between Fincher's film and it's cinematic predecessor and original source material is a tempo that relentlessly flies. Even at over two and a half hours, the film never feels busy or muddled. There is a lot of backstory and exposition to get through and Fincher and screenwriter Steven Zaillian obviously don't want to get bogged down. One of the issues with the novel is that – while it could be bracingly exciting for stretches – it does drag more often than it should. The beginning of Steig Larssson's novel, in particular, is something of a chore to get through. It basically takes about 300 pages to get to “the good stuff” and Fincher absolutely flies through that part. The original Swedish film is better at pacing than the novel, but also takes a more methodical, slower approach than Fincher's film that can still feel a bit choppy at times. To be fair, that film is hurt by being cut down from a mini-series/TV movie to feature-film length, which may explain some of the seeming choppiness. Fincher and Zaillian ultimately do a great job of distilling Larsson's somewhat convoluted story to its essence and have crafted an exciting murder mystery. There are some noticeable changes for viewers familiar with the material, but they seem fitting and don't drastically alter the main thrust of the tale. Characters still matter, but at its heart The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo is still a pulpy serial-killer mystery. Fincher's film focuses on the investigation more than on Blomkvist or even Salander and I think that helps add a tension that may get lost if you slow it down too much. This is Fincher's third serial-killer film and each are different in their own way. However, as Fincher has aged and improved in his craft, that sense of danger has gotten a bit crisper. In The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, the sense that every clue leading to another is vital because of some unseen, lurking threat (that doesn't feel fake or contrived) is perhaps the film's best characteristic, one that shows why adult mysteries and thrillers can work so well on the big screen. It also shows that no one is better at filming it than David Fincher.

The other noticeable difference between the original and Fincher's film is the obvious difference in budget and talent behind the camera. We see this right off the bat as the opening credits sequence – featuring a Karen O cover of Led Zeppelin's “Immigrant Song” – is absolutely mesmerizing with an evocative and sinister gothic take that is essentially divorced from the rest of the film but still manages to capture the spirit of the story you are about to watch. It brought to mind a more brooding, dangerous Bond intro; Craig himself stated “Those opening credits definitely give us food for thought in terms of the next Bond.” In fact, the score from Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross is just as good here as it was with The Social Network. It's different; never dull or depressing, it manages to be haunting and stark without overpowering the action at any point. At this point in his career, Fincher has become something of a master with his own visual style and we see it throughout The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo. Fincher and cinematographer Jeff Cronenweth do an outstanding job giving us haunting and atmospheric shots of Scandinavian winters (shooting in Sweden is a big help here) – the long drive up to the Vanger estate is a memorable one – and claustrophobic interiors (think the climax which I won't spoil here) that really add to the ambiance and tone of it all, helping it rise from B-level pulp to a gorgeous first-rate feature film.

Daniel Craig is solid as central character Mikael Blomkivst, the “detective” of the story. Fincher and Craig are smart to slightly alter Blomkvist; gone is the hemming and hawing of the book, where the disgraced journalist is slow to come around on Henrik's offer and even slower to get momentum on the investigation. Gone also is a certain undercurrent of romanticism portrayed by Michael Nyqvist in the Swedish original. Craig's Blomkivst is a professional; Nyqvist's a romantic. Craig tones down the 007 and displays a curiosity as Blomkvist that invokes a sort of 21st century Sherlock Holmes...or Watson depending on who you believe inhabits what role in this story. It isn't necessarily a better or worse performance, but I think Fincher's confidence – and by its very nature his style – seep down into this film's Blomkivst and Salander. Both seem more assured and confident here, determined and focused – whereas in the Swedish, it feels like Nyqvist and Rapace are more insecure in their own skin and within the context of the story. Whether this is better or worse will depend on the individual viewer. If truth be told, I think this newer version and set of performances is probably the stronger of the two cinematic treatments, but again, that may be a matter of personal taste.

Mikael Blomkvist may be the central character of book and film and Daniel Craig may be the big “star” of the production, but anyone who has read the book, or watched either film knows who, in fact, is the most interesting character in the series. Rooney Mara blows it out of the water with her total transformation into the character of Lisbeth Salander, the cyberpunk hacker who seemingly is constantly straddling the line between sane and insane. Salander is a fascinating character, one that actually rises above Larsson's writing. Larsson was an able storyteller but crude writer; his Salander is arguably his greatest creation. Salander is a victim, a woman-child struggling to break out and be free, but everytime she thinks she's ahead of the game, a curveball is thrown to force her to adapt and sometimes face consequences that are hard to imagine for most. Fincher and Mara's Salander is different from the novel and the character played by Noomi Rapace. Here, she is sexual and sexually attractive, even in a get-up that manages to hide it well. The flashes of anger and terrible vengeance are still there (her revenge on Bjurman is thrillingly shot even for those who know it is coming), but Mara seemingly tones down the goth loner and plays up the genius in the character. In the novel, she was not sexual and wasn't presented as such. She was smart – a genius at some things – but was outmaneuvered at times and continually victimized, forcing her to grow and mature outside the parameters of “normal” society. She was never fully confident in herself except for her work investigating and in relation to technology. We had a better sense of her past and some of the details helped us understand the character's complex and challenging nature and actions. In the book, when she later offers herself to Blomkvist, it is not out of love or a need for closeness, but a way to take back what had been forcefully taken from her (having been raped). In both instances, it is in the context of comforting Mikael after he is shot at; here though, Mara is presented in a much more sexual nature, more attractive and confident, while Mikael is the one left unsure. The end of the film presents a slightly different Lisbeth and something of an inverse in how the two leave their relationship standing. Time will tell which version audiences and harcore “Millennium” fans prefer.

One of the aspects of the film that was hailed before shooting even began was the seemingly impeccable casting. Christopher Plummer was a universally beloved choice as the elder Vanger, as was Stellan Skarsgård as the current Vanger Corp. CEO, Martin Vanger. The rest of the cast – including Joely Richardson and Robin Wright – are strong. Richardson, in particular, gives a balanced, careful performance which the audience picks up on without really knowing why. Not to give away the ending to those who don't know, but Fincher's take is rather ingenious and streamlined, sparing us a trip to Australia, that in the book felt a bit out of place even if it worked in the context of Larsson's story. What worked in Larsson's book, however, wouldn't have worked as well on film in my opinion. The epilogue in Fincher's version does feel a bit tacked on, a separate entity from the rest of his film, but then again, that was much the case in the novel. Fincher does bring it home in an interesting way – different from but still a nod to the source material – as we are left with something of an inconclusive shot and a feeling that falls somewhere below complete satisfaction. Fincher is good at that though; this is unsettling material with unsavory characters and consequences that extend beyond this story for our two main characters. It is open-ended and flexible enough to allow for sequels (of which there are two), but can also serve as a haunting end note if this were to be the end of the American version of the series (or even the end of Fincher's involvement).

There are interesting issues raised by Larsson's The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo that are seemingly helped by seeing it all on screen. There is a tendency in the novel to go a bit too far in describing the violence and rape that occur to multiple women, most notably Lisbeth Salander. There is always an uneasy feeling that what is meant as showcasing the horrible nature and evil in violence against women – the original Swedish title of the novel translates to “Men Who Hate Women” – flies to close to that imaginary border that separates it from exploitation. I think Fincher does a really masterful job of showing all the evil of, and discomfort in watching, rape, without veering into queasy and hypocritical exploitation. Make no mistake, the rape scenes are horrible and graphic, but feel perfectly balanced and never feel exploitative or even sexual/erotic in nature. Last House on the Left and I Spit On Your Grave this is not (and that is a GOOD thing). Fincher does change the sexuality of Salander's character but not to a point that drastically alters the character; where Larsson played her as an asexual, almost childish girl, Mara is more of a sexual being, a fully realized and more confident woman. It is not the most realistic portrayal of rape ever shown or attempted (part of the issue with Larsson's trilogy), but within the context of a murder-mystery/revenge thriller (or whatever you want to call it), it certainly adds a layer you don't see often in mainstream film-making.

Atmosphere and immersion are what is best about Fincher's work here and Larsson's “Millennium” trilogy as a whole. That is really what they are all about; sure, the mystery and story in The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo is a compelling (if a bit dense) and entertaining one, especially for those yet to experience it. But it is that feeling of loneliness and isolation in the harsh Swedish winter that really adds something to this film. It is also why Fincher feels like the perfect director to take this material on. This is now Fincher's third serial-killer film and perhaps his most polished to date. I don't know if it's his best and it doesn't feel like he's trying to reinvent the wheel here, but this film serves as a reminder (as if we needed it) of how good Fincher is at this sort of thing. It is a testament to his skill that I have a hard time imagining anyone else more suited at turning this into a major film and I have a harder time believing the material could be done any better than this. Ultimately, this is what adaptations are supposed to look like.


Jeremy Wilson can be reached at Jpwilson1984@gmail.com and on Twitter @Jpwilson1984



The 411: David Fincher has done it again as he returns with another great serial-killer thriller to join his resume alongside Se7en and Zodiac. The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo is an exciting and well-executed thriller that manages to not only serve as a faithful adaptation of the Stieg Larsson novel and original Swedish film, but, in fact, improves upon them in some ways. Fincher increases the pace here as the film absolutely flies through its 2:40 running time (until perhaps the very end), but also never feels rushed. The Swedish winter and dangerous search for the truth is evocatively shot and is helped by another great score from Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross. Along with Fincher's great work, Rooney Mara's total transformation and breakout performance as Lisbeth Salander is a star-making turn that will not doubt launch her into Hollywood stardom. Mara more than justifies her casting as the avenging Salander, and the character and her performance is the biggest reason why there would be continued interest in two more of these “Millennium” films. The rest of the cast is very solid, especially Craig, Plummer, Richardson and Skarsgård, the later three seemingly perfectly cast in their respective roles. This is not necessarily the kind of heart-warming holiday film you and your family may want to sit through at this time of the year, but it is a compelling and exciting adult thriller that does seem hard to come by these days. Therefore, if you want a change of pace from the holiday and family slate of films, you should definitely check it out. Recommended.
411 Elite Award
Final Score:  9.0   [  Amazing ]  legend


Post Comment (11)  |  Email Jeremy Wilson  |  View Jeremy Wilson's 411 Profile

  Send To Friend  |    Stumble It!  |    Digg It!  | 



Please add your comment below.
If you are registered, you can login and post under your registered name. If not, you can post as a guest or register.

* Please note that 411 moderates all comments. Your comment will show up on the site after it has been approved by an editor.
 
Name : 
Comment : 
Remaining Characters : 
2800
 

Comments (11)

 
Having read all three books multiple times and seeing the Swedish movies, I have to say this movie was fantastic.

It is very faithful to the books and I thought every one of the people in it did a really good job.

Don't get me wrong, the Swedish movie is good as well, but this one blows it out of the water. At least that is my opinion.

I really hope that Fincher will pick up the next two books to do as well. But I heard a rumor that he was only going to do this one and that's a shame.


Posted By: Terra (Guest)  on December 29, 2011 at 01:31 AM

 
 
Mara's portrayal of Salander was incredible. Her "revenge" scenes had me almost cheering in my seat. As the first poster said,this movie was incredible. And every actor did a fantastic job,but Mara and Craig stole the show.

Posted By: Guest#6601 (Guest)  on December 29, 2011 at 08:41 AM

 
 
Kudos for an excellent review! I watched this last week, without reading the books or watching the Swedish versions, and thought it was an amazing film. So its very disheartening to see some 'hipster' review it elsewhere and give the film 1 of 4 stars because 'it wasn't the Swedish version', ugh. Thanks, Jeremy, its good to get an idea of the variances in the different formats... and I certainly hope Fincher and cast come back for the other two books.

Posted By: Creed (Guest)  on January 02, 2012 at 10:05 PM

 
 
Super keen to see this. Have read all the books but not seen the swedish movies yet.

Love David Fincher too, the guy hasn't really made a bad movie.


Posted By: Oh Lymping Hero! (Guest)  on January 03, 2012 at 05:54 PM

 
 
Pretty disappointing. The whole casting just seemed off. Maybe I'll check out the other version.

Posted By: Guest#5222 (Guest)  on January 07, 2012 at 11:12 PM

 
 
I love it when the rating says that a film has 'language'. Really? No, it's a silent film with no subtitles, moron. :P

Posted By: Guest#5361 (Guest)  on January 15, 2012 at 08:08 AM

 
 
The swedish version was better

Posted By: Oh... death to america (Guest)  on January 15, 2012 at 10:34 AM

 
 
This version was superior to this Swedish version in almost every way, except the most important one.

Count me as completely underwhelmed by Mara's Lizbeth. I felt like she was over shadowed by a superior actor in Daniel Craig, and Lizbeth is the most important character in the story because she is what makes it stand out from your standard thriller. Heck she is one of the best fictional characters of the last 20 years.

Even that one downgrade, though, is enough for me to pick the Swedish version over this one, because IT'S THE MOST IMPORTANT PART!

I watched the entire movie thinking how much Rapace would have killed it, because from the directing to the other actors, this was superior in every other way.

Or it's possible that the other aspects of the Swedish version were so mediocre that she just stood out that much more because she wasnt necessarily that good, just so much better than everything else around her.


Posted By: Guest#6785 (Guest)  on January 18, 2012 at 02:15 PM

 
 
Just watched the Swedish version yesterday and loved it. I will definitely be watching this version as well.

Posted By: Guest#9011 (Guest)  on January 22, 2012 at 12:55 AM

 
 
ok, just watched this version after watching the swedish one last week; this was good but i preferred the swedish original. just my preference.

Posted By: Guest#6660 (Guest)  on January 30, 2012 at 02:32 PM

 
 
I prefer the original. Not saying that this remake sucks or whatever, but I liked the orig. better.

Posted By: Guest#7252 (Guest)  on February 08, 2012 at 07:43 PM

 


www.41mania.com
Copyright (c) 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.