Kung Fu Panda Review
Posted by Shawn S. Lealos on 06.09.2008
The first big animated flick of the summer hit this weekend. Is it worth the hype or will it be forgotten by the time Wall-E crashes into theaters?
Directed by Mark Osborne and John Stevenson Written by Jonathan Abel, Glenn Berger, Ethan Reiff and Cyrus Voris
Cast
Jack Black ... Po
Dustin Hoffman ... Shifu
Angelina Jolie ... Tigress
Ian McShane ... Tai Lung
Jackie Chan ... Monkey
Seth Rogan ... Mantis
Lucy Liu ...Viper
David Cross ... Crane
Randall Duk Kim ... Oogway
James Hong ... Mr. Ping
Michael Clarke Duncan ... Commander Vachr
DreamWorks Rated PG for sequences of martial arts action Running Time: 92 min
Kung Fu Panda is a familiar story that has been heard many times before. Po is a panda bear that dreams of being a great kung fu fighter. He idolizes The Furious Five, a group of kung fu fighters who protect the local village from all forms of evil. Po has all their action figures and posters of the group hang on his walls, but while his dreams are full of kung fu heroics, his life is actually quite boring. He works with his father in a noodle shop. While his father, a goose, is perfectly content living a life making the best noodle soup in the land, Po wants more. This dream will become a reality when the legendary master Oogway has a vision that the evil Tai Lung will return to seek vengeance against the kung fu master Shifu.
While he seems an unlikely hero, Oogway determines it is Po who will become the Dragon Warrior, the only hope for defeating Tai Lung and saving the village. This is not anticipated and Master Shifu does everything he can to discourage Po from continuing his training. The best of the Furious Five, the warrior Tigress, has been groomed for the mantle of Dragon Warrior and when she is passed over for the fat panda, Po finds his heroes offer little help when it comes to preparing for his upcoming battles. This sets in motion a story both funny and uplifting - if you are a young child.
The animation starts off in the style of classic anime, but we soon discover it is a dream sequence. When Po wakes up, things are traditionally animated, only slipping back into anime when battle sequences occur later in the film. The backgrounds and settings are beautifully animated but there is something strange about the characters. I can’t quite put my finger on it, but it seems the characters are just off when it comes to the design. With such beautifully animated landscapes, the live action animation seems to never reach an acceptable level. I also find it weak that the entire village is almost nothing but pigs, bunnies and geese, in what appears to be a lazy animation effort. I understand the kung fu fighters were the only ones of their species in the village (tiger, mantis, viper, crane, monkey, and eventually a panda) but it still seems a lazy attempt to create a large village where all the background characters look the exact same.
My main problem with the movie is the voice work of Jack Black. Every time Po opens his mouth it’s not the fat panda I hear, it’s Jack Black. I don’t know if the script was written for his specific style of humor or if he was allowed to improvise much of his dialogue, but the character never seems real to me and that is a problem if you are expected to sympathize with Po. When the battles start in the second half of the film, it works much better, but the first half was almost ruined by Black’s voice work.
It is not all Jack Black’s fault that this movie did not reach me, although he is partially responsible. When Robin Williams took the genie in Aladdin and made him a crazy, hyperactive version of himself, it still worked. You were listening to Robin Williams, and you knew it was Robin Williams, but it was Robin Williams as the genie. I can’t get past the fact that I am listening to Jack Black playing a version of Jack Black in this movie. The fault of this lies in the script. It never reaches higher than easy jokes and simple visual gags. In the days of Pixar, and even smart pop culture movies like DreamWorks own Shrek, this film never comes close to the bar of creativity and originality those movies set.
The rest of the voice actors do not face this same criticism. Angelina Jolie is perfect in her role as the insolent, brave warrior Tigress, passed by when Oogway chooses Po. Randall Duk Kim is brilliant as Oogway as well, bringing a very humorous characterization to the wise old turtle. Ian McShane, Seth Rogan, David Cross and Lucy Liu are all solid in their minor roles as well. Surprisingly, Jackie Chan is not distracting with his voice work as Monkey, and Chan usually annoys me every time he opens his mouth. I save the best for last. Dustin Hoffman is brilliant as the Master Shifu, annoyed, angry and weary all at once. It is said Hoffman was not sure he would take the role until he realized Shifu was, at heart, a little prick. Then he signed on without any reservations. He is the best voice actor in the movie and rules every scene he voices.
As a movie catering towards children, I question some of the decisions made in the storyline itself. Master Shifu figures out early that Po, despite his enthusiasm, is a horrible kung fu fighter. He almost gives up until the fateful day he discovers the one thing that makes Po the Dragon Warrior. I will go ahead and spoil that reveal here and let you know it is the fact that Po loves to eat. I mean, he’s a fat panda right? Well, if food is used as a training tool, Po can fight up to the level of the master himself. The lesson learned here is that it is okay if you are a fat kid who eats too much. Just use the food to help you achieve your other goals and desires. I think that is a dangerous and sloppy lesson to teach kids.
It has been asked recently if Kung Fu Panda would beat out the next Disney effort Wall-E both in financial box office totals as well as critical acclaim. I don’t think it will. Kung Fu Panda will not be a movie that has a long life span. For kids, it is the best flavor of the day. You have a fat panda kung fu fighter with funny lines which will make a perfect toy to keep kids occupied until the next big thing comes along. However, for animated films geared towards kids, the life expectancy is only as long as the next big attention grabber. For a movie to reach a wider audience and become a great animated film it needs to reach adults and I don’t think Kung Fu Panda attempts to reach that level during its entire running time.
The 411: Kung Fu Panda is a great summer film for the kids. It achieves everything you could want in a kid’s feature film, with the exception of the “eating disorders are good” storyline. It has quips and quotes that your kids will be saying for weeks and the movie will present you with lots of new toys they will be clamoring for immediately upon leaving the theater. As a solid animated feature for all ages, it fails. It is simplistic and exudes a low brow humor that will make you laugh but won’t stick with you. Kung Fu Panda takes the easy way out and will be forgotten by the time the next big thing rolls through the doors of your multiplex.
We saw the movie with my kids yesterday and we all felt it was a terrific movie.
The early Pixar movies were absolutely great but since Cars their movies have been less and less kid friendly. The last movie "Ratatouille" was an absolute nightmare because my kids hated the movie and nearly forced us to leave the theatre before the movie was finished. I’ve seen the trailers and the Wall-E robot is cute but I heard the movie will have almost no dialogue in it so how can you be so sure that Wall-E will a better movie then Kung-Fu Panda.
Have you seen Wall-E by any chance?
Posted By: Guest (Guest) on June 09, 2008 at 12:08 AM
im a 23 year old guy and i saw it and loved it, the animated rivals pixar and I thoroughly enjoyed myself. The action scenes were amazing.
Posted By: Guest#3609 (Guest) on June 09, 2008 at 12:31 AM
I thought this was an excellent movie, and I'm a 20 year-old guy who's generally skeptical of all the Pixar movies that come out and avoids most of them. This deserves a higher rating. 9.0 would be my opinion.
Skidoosh!
Posted By: Booooo!!! (Guest) on June 09, 2008 at 01:57 AM
"Have you seen Wall-E by any chance?"
It would be difficult for Shawn or any of us to have seen it, it has yet to be released.
Posted By: Jeremy Thomas (Registered) on June 09, 2008 at 02:18 AM
It was what I expected. Entertaining but not remarkable. I agree with the 7 rating which I think would mean it's worth seeing, it sounded to me like this review was bad for the movie but then I saw the 7 rating. The story line was very predictable as expected from this type of movie. I'd agree that Dustin Hoffman had the best voice acting. I thought Liu, Jollie, and even Chan were all under used (I actually forgot it was Jackie Chan untill the credits rolled). I had also forgotten Lucy Liu was the snake, but then it made sense to me why I thought the snake was so hot when I saw it was her, it's amazing what a voice can do. They did a good job making Tai Lung look like a true bad ass, he was an excellent villian.
Posted By: Kevin (Guest) on June 09, 2008 at 02:42 AM
I gave it a 7 (which is considered good) because I did like it. I was just disapointed because it could have been so much better.
And Jack Black really disapointed me.
As for Wall-E, I said I did not think this movie would beat it in either area, not that I knew for a fact that it wouldn't.
I was entertained, but underwhelmed. And disapoitned, because I am a Jack Black fan and believe he hurt this movie in my opinion.
Posted By: Shawn S. Lealos (Registered) on June 09, 2008 at 03:46 AM
i have to disagree about Pixar's decline. it started with the dreadful The Incredibores and Pixar really hasn't recovered from that.
i have hopes for Wall-E, but i won't expect too much.
glad to hear this was a good movie, i promised my son and two of his friends that i would take them to see it, so i guess i don't have to find an excuse to get out of it.
Posted By: Darth Mortis (Registered) on June 09, 2008 at 04:43 AM
obviously you havent seen wall-e. I think he asked it as sarcasm based on the line before his question. How can you be sure Wall-E will be better, have you even seen it yet? Obviously he knows you haven't seen it jackass.
Posted By: Chris (Guest) on June 09, 2008 at 05:30 AM
I'm 29 and I love animated movies. This was a great one.
Posted By: William (Guest) on June 09, 2008 at 11:51 AM
i thought the incredables were terrific. and the rat movie was in talk of best picture at the oscar. so i don't think pixar has gone down at all. besides i can't believe people still don't believe in pixar. but hey this is the first time i've agreed with a review rating with you guys for awhile. i can't wait to see what you guys give the happening and the hulk next week. i'll bet you will give the happening 7.5 and the hulk 10.0 because your comic book geeks. not that there's anything wrong with that.
Posted By: johnny (Guest) on June 09, 2008 at 12:33 PM
I'm 19 and I'm left wondering why most of you haven't seemed to grow up.
Posted By: Guest#8815 (Guest) on June 09, 2008 at 12:54 PM
For those who said that Pixar has gone downhill.
Yes, Pixar movies are not just for kids. Ratatouille is about artistic ethic and integrity. It's OK if you or your kids don't like it, people are different, but it has the heart and quality that very few studios can catch, let alone Dreamworks.
If you argue about boxoffice gross, DW and Pixar both have 9 CG animated films, of which Pixar grossed 4.3 bils and DW 3.8 bils over the world.
If you argue about critical responses, DW only had 1 Oscar for Shrek and 2 Annies, while Pixar had 3 Oscars, 6 Annies, 2 Golden Globes and 1 BAFTA, especially that last flick about a rat, Ratatouille, grabbed all 4.
So yeah, I haven't seen WALL-E yet and Kung Fu Panda is good for a laugh, but for what it's worth, WALL-E will be another classic from Pixar that stands the time.
Posted By: Jenny (Guest) on June 09, 2008 at 01:28 PM
i'm 26 myself and as far as "growing up" is concerned, i'm doing enough mature things in life, like paying a mortage and working 9-5; that i want to keep a shred of the kid in me alive by watching an animated movie then i think i've earned the right. i'm actually checking this one out tonite, thanks for the review!
Posted By: hellboysetsfire (Guest) on June 09, 2008 at 01:34 PM
It's a cartoon panda. Voiced by Jack Black.
Don't care how much you do or think you deserve, it has bad diea written all over it.
Posted By: Guest#4860 (Guest) on June 09, 2008 at 01:53 PM
I think they are saying the right thing on the poster "PREPARE FOR AWESOMENESS" JULY 18!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted By: Vmexican21 (Guest) on June 09, 2008 at 02:31 PM
I expected the movie to be good to alright, and I think it surpassed those expectations. It was awesome.
Posted By: Guest#1687 (Guest) on June 09, 2008 at 02:48 PM
I don't know, this movie doesn't seem up my alley. None of the previews impressed me that much. Not to say that if I catch it on HBO or something down the road, i'll check it out. Wasn't crapping on it or anything. Sure it's a nice day out with the kids in an AC enviroment and sure it's prob. going to be an ok movie.
BTW, off topic note. I think it's clear that only 3 people hate The Incredibles, and two of them are frequent commenters here. How in the heck can you hate that movie?
Posted By: Kevin F. (Guest) on June 09, 2008 at 03:32 PM
"obviously you havent seen wall-e. I think he asked it as sarcasm based on the line before his question. How can you be sure Wall-E
will be better, have you even seen it yet? Obviously he knows you haven't seen it jackass."
Wow, someone needs anger management classes. Or maybe some "Reading Comprehension" classes.
Posted By: Shawn S. Lealos (Registered) on June 09, 2008 at 05:18 PM
for the record, I am a 16 year old male, and thought this was a great movie. Yeah, call me immature but if you say that, you obviously are some uptight asshole who doesn't know how to let loose.
Posted By: Kevin (Guest) on June 09, 2008 at 09:25 PM
Wow! It sure looks like people are blowing things out of proportion for my earlier comments.
Anyway, I think that Pixar reputation is well deserved but I still stand by my earlier comment that Pixar movies are becoming less and less kid friendly then movies made by Disney, DreamWorks Animation, and BlueSky. I haven’t seen Wall-E but seriously a movie without dialogue and about environmentalism is a very serious subject that doesn’t sound like fun for kids. I suspect some people have forgotten what it was like when we used to get up Saturday morning to watch “Looney Toons” shows with Bugs Bunny "Hey what’s up doc", Daffy Duck and Foghorn Leghorn. I think that kid’s movies nowadays are trying too much to please all quadrants and by doing this they’ve become less and less interesting to kids. I’d like to see kids movies go back to lighter fare. I realize that it will bore the adults who are tagged along with the kids but it’s there time and we adults have our more adult things to entertain us.
I don’t know but I suspect we’ll hear from all the critics on how Wall-E is great and all but in fact they’re reviewing the movies like they review art but kids don’t go to see movie to see art, they are there to have fun and be entertained.
Posted By: Guest#1 (Guest) on June 10, 2008 at 01:27 PM
Just saw it. I'm actually a Pixar guy and the story about the Rat, not going to try and spell it, is my favorite of theirs. And I think all pixar movies have been better than the Dreamworks ones. Shrek was a good movie, but they haven't been able to follow up. I would give Kung Fu Panda a 6.5.
Posted By: Aaron Hubbard (Registered) on June 13, 2008 at 11:22 PM
this is so far the best animated movie i ever seen. I love animated movies & watched almost all but nothing can compete with Kung fu panda, i had laugh all minute from beginning to end of movie!! a must watch movie!!
Posted By: mG (Guest) on June 15, 2008 at 09:26 AM