Bill Maher- Himself
Directed by Larry Charles
Distributed by Lionsgate
Rated R for some language and sexual material
Runtime- 101 minutes
Website: http://lionsgate.com/religulous/
Ah, yes, religion, one of those things you're not supposed to discuss in "polite company" (politics and "sex" are the other two that I know of. Are there others?). It can be seen as offensive and "bad manners." But then if you're Bill Maher, famous stand-up comedian, host of HBO's "Real Time with Bill Maher" and a bit of an atheist (or maybe agnostic is a better word), you're not all that interested in whether or not you offend believers, spiritualists, or "people of faith" when you talk about religion and what people believe. In fact, you revel in discussing all of the odd, weird, and absurd little and big things people accept as truth and fact. And you also get scared.
Very, very scared.
"Religulous," Maher's documentary examination/expose on what the world's major monotheistic religions (and a few, shall we say, "lesser" religions, like Scientology and Mormonism) and their devout followers actually believe, is basically Maher travelling the world to find out what it is people really believe. From a Christian trucker's chapel in North Carolina to an Islamic mosque in Holland, to Jerusalem and the Vatican and several points in between, Maher asks the same pointed questions to anyone willing to talk to him: Why do you people believe in these fairy tales, and why are you so stupid? Don't you think this "religious" stuff has done more general harm than good?
As you'd expect, Maher manages to offend pretty much every person he comes in contact with. They, be it Christian or Muslim or Jew or whatever, can't fathom why someone would doubt or "cast an aspersion" on their faith. This is where a majority of the flick's comedy comes from, and it's also the aspect of the flick that's likely to generate a huge heaping of controversy. Maher, and to a lesser extent director Larry "Borat" Charles, aren't "playing fair," essentially asking devout believers on the spot, without preparation, what they believe and why. No one is allowed to present the "other side" of the issue. I think that criticism is a tad invalid in this case as Maher's views are already widely known and absolutely no one involved presents the movie as if its some thoughtful journalistic endeavor, so it's not like Maher and Charles are pulling a fast one on the audience. Everyone knows what they're getting into ahead of time. And, I'd suspect that, even with extensive preparation (like getting some of the questions ahead of time), none of the devout interviewees who end up looking like fools would have fared any better. What else are any of them going to say beyond what they've already said that isn't going to be total nonsense?
The flick's funniest interview is the one Maher does with Mark Pryor, Democratic Congressperson from Arkansas. Pryor can't answer any of Maher's questions, and when he does provide an answer it's incoherent at best. This is also probably the best and smartest interview in the whole movie as it demolishes any potential criticism that Maher and Charles may get from right wing conservatives they they've created an anti-Republican movie (there's file footage towards the beginning featuring John Sidney McCain III proclaiming the United States is a Christian nation and the Constitution is based on the Bible, which is just bullshit). The scariest interview is a toss up between Ken Ham, right wing Christian yahoo who runs a "Creationist Museum" that features exhibits of humans and dinosaurs exisiting at the same time (one dinosaur exhibit has the dinosaur wearing a saddle. Yes, a saddle, like on a freaking horse) and the interview snippets from Europe, where Maher interviews various Muslims about whether or not they have the right to riot and commit violence if they feel as though someone has attacked Islam (we get to see file footage of the Prophet Mohammed cartoon protest riots and the dead body of Dutch director Theo van Gogh, who was murdered after making a short movie condemning violence against women "sanctioned" by the Koran). No one says flat out "no."
So, should you go see "Religulous"? I think you should. I enjoyed the flick quite a bit, but then, as I said above, as a fan of Maher's, I knew what I was essentially getting beforehand. I would encourage everyone to go see it, though, if they get the chance, even if they don't agree with anything Maher advocates. Watch the final segment of the flick, where Maher sums the whole thing up and strongly shows why religion is what's really hindering humanity from progressing. How is Maher wrong?
See it, see it, see it.
So what do we have here? Gratuitous Bill Maher, gratuitous Bill Maher in Megiddo, Israel, home of the End Times, an old religious propaganda movie, a "Hell is real" sign, gratuitous George W. Bush looking like a fool, gratuitous grainy footage of Bill Maher stand-up from the 1980's, pictures of Maher as a child, gratuitous mother and sister of Bill Maher, finding out that Bill Maher's mother was Jewish, gratuitous North Carolina Christian trucker's chapel, discussing the Shroud of Turin, a former alleged Satanic priest, gratuitous interview with a scientist from the Human Genome Project, gratuitous Jonah Hill as a potential teenage Jesus, gratuitous Christian truckers pryaing for Jesus to fix Bill Maher, montage of rich scumbag televangelists asking for money, gratuitous Dr. Jerimiah Cummings, talking about pimps, arguing about whether or not Jesus liked rich people, a car bomb, Bill Maher in Sodom and Gomorrah, gratuitous Fred Phelps and Jerry Falwell talking about fags, gratuitous "reformed" homsexuals, a snippet of gay porno, gratuitous Ted Haggard, hugging a "former" gay guy, an ex-Jew for Jesus, gratuitous John Sidney McCain III saying that America is a Christian nation and that the Constitution is based on the Bible, gratuitous Arkansas Democratic Congressperson Mark Pryor looking like a fool, the Krakken from "Clash of the Titans," gratuitous Ken Ham, gratuitous Chuck Heston kissing an ape, gratuitous Kirk Cameron, Bill Maher going to the Vatican and talking to a Vatican astronomer, gratuitous Robert Blake in "Hell Town," gratuitous Holy Land Experience in Florida with an exclusive interview with Jesus, gratuitous Christian cartoons, gratuitous Bill Maher in "Cannibal Women in the Avocado Jungle of Death," demolishing Scientology, gratuitous weird stories about Mormonism including Mormon porn, gratuitous non-Zionist Jews, a Spanish Protestant Church where the preacher claims to be second coming of Jesus, gratuitous "Scarface," a pot smoking reverand in Amsterdam, talking to Muslims in Amsterdam, gratuitous Muslim gay bar, burning hair, running a vacuum cleaner in a mosque, talking about the End Times, and Bill Maher telling everyone to grow up or die.
Best lines: "Every family is dysfunctional," "I'm just asking questions," "Thank you for being Christ-like, and not just Christian," "The song did go platinum," "So am I to assume that this is your only two-thousand dollar suit?," "You didn't have a hard on, though, did you?," "This man lived inside a fish for three days?," "You don't have to pass an IQ test to be in the Senate," "The Scriptures are not teaching science," "He is God. Are you God?," "How ridiculous is that? A Jewish carpenter? They call a carpenter," "I don't find this Jew funny," and "Grow up or die."
The 411: "Religulous" isn't for everyone. It's a condemnation of pretty much all of the major relgions and is probably going to offend believers in all of them. But then again, as the movie points out, that's pretty much how it always works. No one can question what people believe, even if it's ridiculous. Bill Maher certainly does try, and I think he suceeds. But, again, your enjoyment of the flick will likely depend heavily on what you believe before going into the theatre. You have been warned.
wow. a liberal has issues with religion. go figure.
Posted By: dan (Guest) on October 05, 2008 at 04:27 AM
It was a great documentary/movie, but probably would sway anyone with religious. They'd probably be offended.
Posted By: Jaime (Guest) on October 05, 2008 at 08:33 AM
I might see this, but I'm not in a rush. I already know the Bible is a book of fiction so I'm set.
Posted By: Zingy (Guest) on October 05, 2008 at 09:31 AM
You are the first person I have ever heard of who has admitted to being a Bill Maher 'fan'.
Posted By: Psychic Sandwich (Guest) on October 05, 2008 at 09:44 AM
Individuals who attack religion unwittingly become hypocrites themselves. Even atheists believe in *something* that holds the answers to life's mysteries (* science, philosophy, et. al). Religion, by definition, is the practice and study of a belief in something greater than ourselves. How does that not encompass those who relentlessly believe science and man-made logic holds all the life's mysteries?
Posted By: Wesgr81 (Guest) on October 05, 2008 at 09:49 AM
Have only seen commercials but a quick point.They get in a backnforth about what if each other is wrong.......lets see if religon is wrong well nothing no consequences if mahr is wrong hmmm a firey damnation for eternity just an observation
Posted By: hhhmmmmm (Guest) on October 05, 2008 at 10:07 AM
Bryan, Why do you degrade your intelligent reviews by throwing in the last two paragraphs? Don't you know you're wasting your time? For as long as I can remember now when reading your reviews I stop at the paragraph before, "so what do we have here" and pick it up again at "The 411" score. Your attempt at a catchphrase or niche has failed my friend...let it go
Posted By: IlikeBillMahertoo (Guest) on October 05, 2008 at 10:50 AM
One of the better movies I've seen of the year. Just fantastic from minute one to the final frame.
Posted By: EricG (Guest) on October 05, 2008 at 11:11 AM
The only real issue that I had with it was when Maher used the term "Grow Up.". It seems to me that no matter what people are talking about, if you don't like what somebody has to say, all you have to do is say, "Grow up!". I know he was trying to say that people shouldn't go by make believe things, but "grow up" has become such a cliche thing to say. The best parts were when he told the guy that his head was on fire and when he was at the truck chapel and was like, "Where's my wallet?".
Posted By: The Great Capt. Smooth (Guest) on October 05, 2008 at 11:33 AM
'No one is allowed to present the "other side" of the issue'
Just the way the crybaby atheists like it.
Posted By: Mikel (Registered) on October 05, 2008 at 11:42 AM
I really had no intention to see this film, but he sold it really well on the Daily Show and I am really excited to see it now.
Posted By: Guest#5772 (Guest) on October 05, 2008 at 12:15 PM
I might see this, but I'm not in a rush. I already know the Bible is a book of fiction so I'm set.
Posted By: Zingy (Guest) on October 05, 2008 at 09:31 AM
Yeah you are sitting there typing letters on a keyboard, on an entertainment website, on a computer because we all came from monkeys right?
Posted By: Captain Patterson (Guest) on October 05, 2008 at 01:55 PM
Personally I tend to believe there's nothing wrong with any religion. Now religious followers-- that's a different story.
Posted By: McObvious (Guest) on October 05, 2008 at 02:15 PM
I thought the movie was fantastic. Granted... Bill takes it to the extreme and can be a little dramatic. But I agree with his overall message, and the movie is just hysterical. I am def. buying it when it comes out on video. To comment on what this other person said: "How does that not encompass those who relentlessly believe science and man-made logic holds all the life's mysteries?" People who believe in science believes in something that there is definite proof for. Things that they can see with their own eyes. Yes, there are many things that are still unexplained...but how would it make any sense to say that one man created everything? Who created him? And so forth and so forth... we should be more concerned about the problems that are going on right now, here, on this earth.
Posted By: candice (Guest) on October 05, 2008 at 02:27 PM
"Individuals who attack religion unwittingly become hypocrites themselves. Even atheists believe in *something* that holds the answers to life's mysteries..."
-- If something is empirically proven, then you don't need to "believe". I think that a human submerged indefinitely under water will drown, but it's not "faith" that causes me to believe that; it's a scientific fact. Faith and fact are completely different and, many would argue, mutually exclusive.
Now, if you're talking about the origins of the universe, or the afterlife, then no, not everyone believes to know the answers. I sure as hell don't.
Posted By: KanyonKreist (Guest) on October 05, 2008 at 02:30 PM
To respond to hmmmmmmm. Belief in God becuase of fear of what happens if you don't is not TRUE belief.
So says a Liberal, not that anyone like dan could understand his narrow world view being wrong.
Posted By: AdamS (Guest) on October 05, 2008 at 02:33 PM
McObvious is right. The inherent and basic beliefs of religion are fine. It's the people who twist and pervert the messages of peace and understanding to their owns gains, whether it's for money or power, that make people atheists. I'm all for a person believing in an invisible man that will solve all of your problems, I just don't care to dragged to death in the street or chastised for being an idiot for not agreeing with religious people. As a side note, how many people have died in the name of religion since written history began? Maybe if we practiced the morals of religion instead of worrying about who's God is better, we all be in a better place. But then again, that would inevitably exclude some type of culture group and then we're back to square one.
Posted By: jbgs2 (Guest) on October 05, 2008 at 03:35 PM
Some of you are missing one of the film's main points in that religion causes more problems then it cures throughout history.
Also, I saw this with a very religious friend of mine and the part where Bill shows the whole messiah story wasnt started with Jesus Christ, he felt was very powerful.
And I cheered when he brought up people laugh at the beliefs of Scientology but fully accept the fairy tales in the bible which are equally as crazy.
Posted By: EricG (Guest) on October 05, 2008 at 04:55 PM
Whoever said God was a man? Why would you think that? Did man create all things? It would be best if people who decided to speak on things actually had some concept of what they're actually trying to shoot down, candice.
Posted By: Lucas Mucus (Guest) on October 05, 2008 at 05:22 PM
Gee, Captain Patterson, I guess I was wrong. People evolving from monkeys sounds absolutely preposterous. I guess I'll dust off my coaster/Bible and read about Moses parting the Red Sea (bullshit), Lot's wife becoming a pillar of salt (bullshit), or God making it rain for 40 days and 40 nights (bullshit).
I know lots of people that are very religious, my wife and my mother for example, and I'd be lying if I said that the Bible doesn't have some redeeming factors. Jesus telling people to be nice to one another or the Ten Commandments are some good rules to live by. It's just too bad the book is filled with some of the craziest, pulled-out-of-someone's-ass stories I've ever read.
Greek mythology? Crazy. Norse mythology? Crazy. Hinduism? Weird. Buddhism? Nuts. Christianity? Totally believable, especially the story of Adam & Eve, or Samson & Delilah. Seriously, it's kind of sad that grown ups believe that stuff.
Posted By: Zingy (Guest) on October 05, 2008 at 07:52 PM
i don't see how people can't believe in a God. it's ridiculous to think that the earth "just happened" things are so complex, the idea that it all happened by chance doesn't make sense. there's no historical evidence of a "big bang" the Bible is historical evidence, historians have not been able to disprove Christ
Posted By: anthony (Guest) on October 05, 2008 at 09:14 PM
re- Wesgr81, KanyonKreist
Maher is actually against Atheism as he does view it as practically a religion in itself as the "practitioners" KNOW for fact there is no God or afterlife, sounds an awful lot like faith to me too...
He doesn't dismiss the idea of a god or afterlife, he just stresses the fact that he does not know and neither does anyone else.
Posted By: Cjo (Guest) on October 05, 2008 at 10:49 PM
this movie was made by puppets..for puppets. Just wait until they finally realize who's really pulling the strings.
Posted By: puppetmaster (Guest) on October 05, 2008 at 10:57 PM
For the record, Bill Maher is not an atheist.
What Maher dislikes about religion is that its so certain that things were one way. He thinks that religion made sense hundreds of years ago, but now we have science to answer questions we didn't have a clue about in the past and we made things up from religion.
He is specifically against atheism because atheists are just on the other side of the mirror of religious people - they're certain that that there is nothing.
Maher is just somewhere in the the middle, where he just doesn't know, he is uncertain about what the truth is, so he asks questions of the religious. I haven't seen the film (just Bill Maher interviews about the film), but if certainty is what he is against, then maybe he should have interviewed more atheists about why there absolutely is no higher being.
Posted By: Manbearpig (Guest) on October 05, 2008 at 10:57 PM
All religions are based on faith, no matter how much theory or dispute exists about the religion or the beliefs, your supposed to have faith your values are true, and live your life around the principles handed to you. Faith... the inner strength to believe every thing will work out.... something science or logic can't offer. It's always good to hear college and highschool kids whose parents were too busy watching tv on sunday mornings question religion, because they always miss the point,,, exercise in faith.
Posted By: what.. (Guest) on October 05, 2008 at 11:20 PM
@ManBearPig & other bone-heads
It's painful to read through all that --- HE"S AGNOSTIC!!!! like many people, but you want to blah blah blah and put him on his own lil defonition....
AGNOSTIC! say it, learn it, research it... he's probably agnostic dietist like many people.
but don't become a part of it, you will make the rest of us look stupid
Posted By: JesusFROMmarrrrs (Guest) on October 06, 2008 at 12:50 AM
So, Bill Maher decides to try to revive his career by questioning religion. The interesting thing about people who try to blame societies problems on religion... they don't have a solution to the contrary. They talk about how the world needs peace (which most religions preach) and how if everyone loved one another and accepted people's differences we wouldn't have poverty, crime or war (which most religions preach) but then they shoot holes in the Bible and point out every little hypocrisy (which shows they miss the point that religion is about perfecting imperfect people), and then they lay out a blanketed statement that "if we didn't have religion, we'd all be better off." OK, well, better off how?
What would take religions place? Rational thinking? Well, rational thinking says we should destroy our enemies before they destroy us. Rational thinking says we should let the old and sick die so that they aren't a burden to society.
Yeah, I'm sure that's a world that Bill Maher wants to live in. And he clearly has forgotten that humans aren't all that rational. Their brains stop working on all cylinders when emotion gets in the way.
I also think that men like Bill Maher have forgotten that religion has also been responsible for specifically great parts of human development. Some of the greatest inventions and artwork have been inspired by religion. Not to mention science itself grew out of religion. And maybe Maher might want to stand back and think about where his freedom of speech would be if it weren't for those "stuffy" Puritan pilgrims that were looking for religious freedom.
Posted By: Religious Rob (Guest) on October 06, 2008 at 01:49 AM
I haven't seen the film yet but I plan to. I think I already know the most important point though, as he seemed to talk about it on the daily show. The point being that WE DON'T KNOW, sometimes, WE JUST DON'T HAVE THE ANSWER AND THAT IS OK. It's a philosophy I personally hold.
The problem in the way religious people think of non-religious folks is they wonder, what do you then follow or what do you believe. YOU DON'T follow anyone or anything, the idea is that you look at what is in front of you and you come to your own conclusion. We certainly don't use science or scientists to guide us through everything. Science is simply a means to end, as I said before, we don't know something that we want to know, and through science we receive an answer or various theories, and even still you can reject it. And, a scientist can be wrong, but a theory can be easily changed as we better understand the world around us through time.
Those ancient books shouldn't be taken literally and not everything in them should just be accepted. For the most part, they can prove as a good moral compass but I wouldn't live my life by a book.
Posted By: Brett (Guest) on October 06, 2008 at 03:08 AM
The point of the movie (and I saw it this weekend with my atheist boyfriend) was to show that each and every religion that has ever existed has managed to cause some kind of disagreement, war, death, destruction, suicide attack, family disagreement, etc. Bill Maher really showed me that if you think about religion logically and take a step out of the faith based box, you will realize the ridiculousness of many religious claims, and how these interchangeable stories have been handed down since the beginning of man. Man has always found a way to worship some kind of higher being. So many people who are religious and walk by faith should question what and who they are following. What creeds am I living my life by and where did it come from?
For all religious folks out there (I was once one myself) you mean to tell me that you don't cringe or giggle just a little bit when you picture the Adam and Eve rib exchange when you hear it mentioned?
Come on.....
Posted By: guest08 (Guest) on October 06, 2008 at 10:54 AM
I need to correct myself. My previous comment stated that my boyfriend is an athiest. He isn't so much an athiest, he just usually says that he, "doesn't know"-just like Bill Maher.
Posted By: guest08 (Guest) on October 06, 2008 at 10:57 AM
IlikeBillMahertoo is right about your last two paragraphs, Bryan. I usually enjoy your reviews but you're just wasting your time and making your review look bad with that ending thing you always do.
Posted By: Leo (Guest) on October 06, 2008 at 06:27 PM
I am very religious, but I wouldn't have a problem seeing this movie if only Bill Maher weren't in it. Someone should just pop his little head, he's so annoying.
Posted By: Guest#2134 (Guest) on October 06, 2008 at 06:32 PM
I need to correct myself. My previous comment stated that my boyfriend is an athiest. He isn't so much an athiest, he just usually says that he, "doesn't know"-just like Bill Maher.
Posted By: guest08
AGNOSTIC!!! holy shit, if you take a stance on something, know the proper terms, all of you!
Posted By: ARGH! (Guest) on October 06, 2008 at 06:41 PM
See the movie, and if anyone out there can answer his questions better, post them here. Until then, don't try to bring out your little black bag of demons, boogie men or vengeful, jealous sky gods to scare me. If you have a personal relationship w/ god that gives you comfort and puts a smile on your face, great, just don't use your "faith" to ruin my day. Being charitable, kind and loving, regardless of the reason (God), is the answer. Why can't that be enough?? For all the reasons explored in this movie it just isn't.
Posted By: dwolf (Guest) on October 06, 2008 at 07:48 PM
Bill Maher is an attention craving moron. He jumps from one side to the other on almost every topic he covers, and now he's using religion to bring attention to himself in a society that's becoming more and more atheistic all the time, mostly due to laziness. What I mean is, people tell themselves that they can do whatever they want with no consequences down the line, rather than actually put any kind of work whatsover into life itself. It's extremely sad that they'll all find out when it's too late how terribly wrong they are, and Mr. Maher will be right there with them.
Posted By: kaktus316 (Guest) on October 06, 2008 at 07:51 PM
I will likely see religulous. I am going to see this film partly because I am sure parts of it will be funny and other parts will be offensive to me or atleast terribly unfair. Even so, it will also show me a comprehensive catalog of today's most public or vocal religious extremists. I also consider myself and educated christian. To a lesser degree, it will also clearly show the various sects of religious faith that demonstrate a profound lack of integration of what we know today to be facts and common sense. These sects that may not be extreme in their agenda but they are still highly misguided none the less. In many cases this is because those folks are under exposed to more educated interpretations of the bible and/or their leaders have some specific cultural or political goal. And some of the religious practices that follow could be seen as outrageous or funny in "gallows humor" sort of way.
Posted By: A moderate Christian Pt 1 (Guest) on October 07, 2008 at 08:40 AM
The fact of the matter though, is that their are many christians that are also strong proponents of science and scientific theories and believe strongly in a society based on a rational rule of law. it is also important to keep in mind that science by its very rules does not facilitate a good deal of useful discussion about what constitutes a large part of the human experience because it is about only those things that can be subjected to the scientific method of empirical verification and precise quantization. Certainly most can agree many topics of great interest and importance fall widely outside this procedure of sciences strict discourse rules. It is a shame that in many cases philosophy as a method of discovery is largely seen as being subsumed as the archaic part of science. Or if not contained and constrained by science, then it is largely considered soft headed folly. Life is often hard and mysterious and even harder still to understand how to act in the face of events beyond ones control that none the less force us into the position of having to make a difficult choice. The fact is that appealing by prayer and meditation into the ineffable intuition that we all have available to us as a means of finding inspiration for proactive and positive choices is an essential and even invaluable resource for all humans. And yet it is now being characterized as only for the weak minded or ignorant. That in my estimation is a great disservice to our society as a whole. It is also a bit absurd since the very starting point of scientific method is that a scientist has an intuition that two or more previously observed things are related, and that if he designs a proper experiment he can then demonstrate this relation in the form of a validated hypothesis. That is my biggest beef with Anti-religious zealots such as Mr Maher. That the unfairly blame religion for as the main cause for irrationality, ignorance and extremism rather than a symptom of it. Are their ignorant or under educated people in the world? Yes, is that because of religion? largely No. do not get me wrong there are religious demagogues just as their academic demagogues. Religion is only as good, pure and well intentioned as those who are preaching it. In the hands of serious and responsible teachers religion can be a powerful force for good, just like say education or say documentaries. In the wrong hands it can be a powerful force for exploiting the hungry under educated seeker as well just like academics, and well documentaries. -- to be finished in a a quick part three. --
Posted By: A moderate Christian Pt 2 (Guest) on October 07, 2008 at 09:09 AM
And even with less than optimal religious beliefs, I am certain you can find droves of under educated people that without religion would have no solid basis for connecting with the larger whole of the world and as a result no moral imperative from which to anchor their ethical choices. Humans can and will always have groups that act from an absurd basis. So I reject whole underlying idea that people are wrong headed and ignorant BECAUSE of religion when in fact wrong headed Religion whether by the ignorance or the demagogue is merely a symptom of having a population that is not taught how to think for themselves and not the cause. Human are feeling creatures first you know the rational functions were the last and highest thing that was evolved into our brains. I would argue that even in many cases less than optimal religion acts as a very successful band-aide for those who otherwise would have no other sense of ethics and purpose. And that is clearly a good thing if not perfect. I would argue that given that opinions will always vary and we cannot mandate that all those currently alive and living as adults get a certain level of education and have a certain analytical facility, That the good done by these imperfect religions is the clear practical choice. Any other perspective is being extreme in the sense that it is making the perfect the enemy of the good. And just perhaps that is a bit arrogant and unproductive and well Extreme in its approach to life and people as a group of free individuals.
Posted By: A moderate Christian Pt 3 (Guest) on October 07, 2008 at 09:09 AM
So a very religious guy wants to "pop" Bill Maher's head off. Another thinks that Maher jumps back and forth on issues--while I don't agree with everything Maher says-- he doesn't change positions. He stays very true to himself. Misunderstanding of other religions has led to conflict since the dawn of time. My god is better than your god. Why are there so many different religions? Why did people believe at one time that gods lived on Mount Olympus? Why do people hold onto a story that was told 2000 years ago at a time when people believed the sun revolved around the earth? Why is the bible correct and everyone else is wrong? Why do conservatives, like Dan at the top of this comments column, have to invoke a political term (liberal) on a religious question? Why can't people question the existance of god without being called a bigot (as Maher has been called)? I hope I never become so short sighted and stuck in belief that I can't question things around me or look at subjects such as this with a closed mind. I don't know how the world began--nobody does. I will probably never know. But I ain't waiting for the Scientology aliens to come back for me. Or am I??
Posted By: Guest#2090 (Guest) on October 08, 2008 at 08:08 AM
Isn't it funny that Libs preach intolerance yet they themselves are the most intolerant of all?
Religous: I have a set of rules that I live by that have been written down for 4000 years.
Atheist: I believe that I am the center of the universe and I have all the answers right here in my 8th grade Life Science book. And, SCIENCEDAMMIT, you all are ignorant idiots for thinking otherwise!
Yes, Yes, we all know you atheists are just the smartest little guys around, and that science has ALL the answers. Of course, except when it doesn't.
Posted By: PalinPower (Guest) on October 08, 2008 at 02:41 PM
Craig Hazen, an evangelical comparative religion professor at Biola University reviews "religulous."
"Maher is pitching this film as mavericky—telling the truth about religion that everyone else is afraid to address. But Religulous is nothing more than filthy, nudie, druggie, and obtusey. There is little to laugh at and nothing to learn (expect maybe that if you quit being religulous you get to act like Caligulous)."
Posted By: Joseff (Guest) on October 09, 2008 at 06:26 PM
Wow - you've gotten ALOT of comments about your review.
I haven't seen this film yet, but color me intrigued.
Great review, Bryan. Unfortunately, I agree with "IlikeBillMahertoo." I always skip the last two paragraphs as well. There's only so many times I can read the word "gratuitous" in one extremely long run on sentence. It would almost be ironic how gratuitous you are with that whole paragraph if it wasn't so annoying.
Just my humble opinion.
Posted By: Frosty (Guest) on October 10, 2008 at 09:35 AM
Isn't it funny that Libs preach intolerance yet they themselves are the most intolerant of all?
I don't see liberals protesting gay rights or killing Muslims who work at convenience stores.
That would be your redneck republicans.
Stone, meet glass house.
Posted By: spacefight (Guest) on October 10, 2008 at 12:43 PM
WWJD?
He would go on Religulous reviews and spew hate towards agnostic/athests.
I WILL PRAY FOR YOU!
Posted By: L I A M (Guest) on October 11, 2008 at 03:11 PM
Gee, Captain Patterson, I guess I was wrong. People evolving from monkeys sounds absolutely preposterous. I guess I'll dust off my coaster/Bible and read about Moses parting the Red Sea (bullshit), Lot's wife becoming a pillar of salt (bullshit), or God making it rain for 40 days and 40 nights (bullshit). Quote Zingy
Where is the proof these did not happen? I am glad you chose these stories, because these are the ones that have scientific research backing them up.
Not saying they are completely true, that is faith, but there has been scientic evidence that have shown these were highly plausible (high concentration of salt in the area, fish fossils found in Mountain ranges, and of course remnants of the pharohs army found at the bottom of the red sea).
To call someone's belief bullshit is absurd. Be thoughtful of other's beliefs.
Posted By: Proof (Guest) on October 16, 2008 at 04:41 PM
Bill Maher, what was that great question he had:'Why do people need to read?'
Look, I can't stand to see this old guy whine. and if I don't need to believe in stuff that isn't there I don't need to go to the movies to watch people act like their somebodye else like children or worse yet see people talk about things they don't know anything about.
Look I just saved myself from the movies.
Posted By: Quentin Beck (Guest) on October 18, 2008 at 05:25 AM