Quarantine Review [2]
Posted by Jeremy Thomas on 10.12.2008
A film that should have been quarantined for your movie-going protection
Directed by: John Erick Dowdle Written by: John Erick Dowdle and Drew Dowdle
Starring: Jennifer Carpenter - Angela Vidal Steve Harris - Scott Percival Jay Hernandez - Jake Johnathon Schaech - George Fletcher Columbus Short - Danny Wilensky Rade Serbedzija - Yuri Ivanov Greg Germann - Laurence Bernard White - Bernard Dania Ramirez - Sadie Marin Hinkle - Kathy Joey King - Briana Denis O'Hare - Randy Jeannie Epper - Mrs. Espinoza
Running Time: 89
Rated R for bloody violent and disturbing content, terror and language.
The documentary style horror film is becoming a staple of cinemas. It was first brought to our attention in 1999 by the worldwide sensation that was The Blair Witch Project, which to this day is the most profitable film in cost-to-gross ratio by having raked in almost $8,000 for every dollar spent. The phenomenon was sure to spawn others who thought that the realism inherent in Blair Witch’s shaky handheld-camera style would make the horror more immediate for the viewers. And truth be told, it wasn’t the first—the first, arguably, would be 1980’s controversial and epically gory Cannibal Holocaust, which earned bans in several countries for its shocking levels of violence. Many films have followed, particularly recently, such as George A. Romero’s Diary of the Dead, Cloverfield and, in 2007, a Spanish film entitled [REC]. Set inside an apartment building, the mockumentary of a news story gone horribly wrong was very well-received. Of course, that means it was only a matter of time until American audiences got a version, and now we have Quarantine.
The film begins with news reporter Angela Vidal (Carpenter) standing in front of a Los Angeles fire department as her camera man Scott (Harris) works from behind the camera. The two are shadowing a team of firefighters for the night as part of a human interest piece. Along the way, they meet their duo they’ll be shadowing—Jake (Hernandez), who seems to be a nice guy, and Fletcher (Schaech) who has no problem hitting on Angela and trying to make bets that he’ll score with her. After a tour of the facility and waiting around for something to happen, they finally get a call that takes them to an apartment building. A pair of police (Fiscella and Short) is there, and the group follows manager Yuri (Šerbedžija) up to an apartment where they find an old woman who seems sick. All hell quickly breaks loose, and the apartment complex is inexplicably sealed off by the CDC, with all forms of communication to the outside world shut off. As the virus, which a veterinarian tenant (Germann) likens to a exceptionally fast-acting rabies, spreads out of control through those trapped inside, they try to find answers and escape for their lives.
Quarantine is not the first horror mockumentary written by screenwriting brothers John Erick and Drew Dowdle—their first script, The Poughkeepsie Tapes, is set to be released next year. As such, the brothers might be expected to have a knack for this style. They frame the storyline around a fairly minimalist plot—there isn’t a lot of complexity to the story, and that’s fine because the point of the story is the here and now and the frights they can conjure up. The Dowldes, using the exact story and plot that [REC] used, are able to come up with some interesting moments in the script by using the first-person perspective, but they rely far too much on the gimmick and well-known horror tropes. Whether that is their fault or that of Jaume Balagueró, the writer/co-director of [REC], is dependent on the particular cliché—the idea of “the Virus” is one that’s been seen entirely too often in horror, and it combines with the now well-known handheld camera-style to make a very familiar-feeling movie. John Erick, also serving as director, does manage to pace the film quite nicely. The opening act is quiet and low-key, giving us an opportunity to learn about Angela, Scott, Jake and Fletcher and maybe start to care about them. Unfortunately there simply isn’t enough there to really care about—Angela is weak and wishy-washy, Scott is generic and Fletcher is more or less a one-note letch. Only Jake has enough about him to come across as truly likeable through the script. The rest of the characters are introduced in rapid-fire succession, and while a few stand out (mostly Danny the cop, Lawrence the veterinarian, Bernard the music teacher and Sadie his student/love interest), the rest are generic and interchangeable. By the time the movie hits the frenetic third act, it’s time to watch people die and prepare for one jump scare after another.
Some must also be said about the handheld camera style of the film. Anyone who got motion sick at Blair Witch or Cloverfield would do well to avoid this one, as Scott is perhaps the least steady cameraman known to man. The film shifts and tiwtches constantly, rarely staying steadily in one place for long. While the motion does create some interesting effects, including an impressive (and amusing) moment where the camera is used as a weapon, it's ultimately too much of a distraction to be considered a good choice. Just once, this reviewer would like to see a handheld camera horror film where the person behind the camera knows what "steady" means.
In terms of the scares, Dowdle does a tolerable job of creating several jump or cringe-worthy moments. Without a score to work off—a wise effort by Dowdle to enhance the realism—we’re left with only the visual cues to know when to anticipate being frightened, and it works vaguely in the movie’s favor. Still, many scares are telegraphed and seem sterile at times. The gore is certainly strong without being over-the-top; a scene where one of the infected gets up and wanders into view with a nasty compound fracture is likely to have audiences squirming in their seats, and the make-up department does a fine job of making the infected seem frighteningly grotesque. The only problem there lies with the script, as without the proper context the victims seem like zombies when in fact, as we eventually learn, they are something else. This misconception contributes to the “seen it before” feel, particularly for those who saw the superior Diary of the Dead. Of course, what contributes more to that feel is that we HAVE seen this before; at least, if you saw the trailer, which telegraphs most of the movie including, moronically, the ending. This leaves the audience just waiting for that moment by the end, which kills any fright the scene may have provided.
One of the biggest problems with Quarantine lies with its lead. Jennifer Carpenter is an engaging actress, as she’s proven playing Deborah Morgan in the excellent Showtime series Dexter. It is only by her charisma that Angela is likeable in the early moments; Carpenter has a goofy sort of insecure manner that makes her portrayals sympathetic. By the time things start to get hairy, Angela becomes unglued, and it only gets worse by Carpenter’s overacting. She turns Angela into a wildly screaming woman, an act which quickly grates on the nerves. When compared with modern horror heroines, who have seemed to develop a backbone, to say that Angela Vidal doesn’t stack up is a serious understatement. Jay Hernandez makes firefighter Jake a much stronger and likeable character, and it’s easy to enjoy watching him take as much of a command of the situation as he can. Bernard White and Dania Ramirez acquit themselves well as Bernard and Sadie, while Rade Šerbedžija is recognizable and solid as Yuri. Greg Germann holds his own for his limited screen time as Lawrence, and everyone else fades into the background as insignificant, including Jonathon Schaech who once again fails to make his character interesting, much as he did with the killer in the terrible Prom Night remake of this year.
How does the film compare to [REC], its source material? Not having seen it, I am not the best person to say. I do know that elements of the plot were changed, likely because the source of the virus in the original Spanish film would probably draw protests from certain groups. Standing on its own however, Quarantine is a film that manages to land squarely in the middle of the pack in terms of horror films, and at the bottom of the handheld camera mockumentary horror pack.
The 411: Full of jump scares and familiar horror tactics, Quarantine is not a movie that is innovative in any way. It's not supposed to be, of course, being a remake, and the Dowdle brothers do manage to create some legitimately eerie moments out of what they have. Unfortunately, the shaky camera scenes and the annoyingly overdone screaming performance by Jennifer Carpenter adds to the familiar cliches to create a film that, while scary at times, leaves the audience wanting more. While Quarantine tries hard, it ultimately fails to deliver, and is a forgettable entry into this subgenre of horror.
i havent seen this movie...but i will say this review is alot better than the other review on the site, at least it seems like you went into the movie with an open mind
oh well, guess ill wait to rent it on dvd =P
Posted By: robb (Guest) on October 12, 2008 at 11:18 AM
Maybe you just like bad movies
Posted By: heyffghdg (Guest) on October 12, 2008 at 12:10 PM
I love how 411mania reviewers think they are Roger Ebert and they have this image to maintain so they type up these badass reviews over analyzing the film and giving movies that arent Oscar worthy crappy scores.
Posted By: natedoggcata (Guest) on October 12, 2008 at 12:30 PM
Yes we do, and this isn't a good movie.
To claim that her manner is realistic is ridiculous considering it's pretty ridiculous the way they act with the camera when all this mayhem is going on. They have to film this and everyone has a right to know. And then you still have Scott the camera man being the same cliche black character in all these bad horror films.
Posted By: Jeffrey Harris (Registered) on October 12, 2008 at 01:44 PM
@natedoggcata:
We've had this debate a few times now. I don't think it's worth rehashing.
@ffghdg:
There's a realistic way to portray hysteria, and then there's what Carpenter did. That is all I will say. Jeffrey and I may have rated the film differently, but we definitely agree on Carpenter's performance.
Posted By: Jeremy Thomas (Registered) on October 12, 2008 at 04:21 PM
If that was a realistic situation, anyone that had a brain cell would've found the closest weapon and destroyed anyone or thing that was infected. This movie was ok for what it was and definitely couldn't be any worse than the most recent horror movies or that crap that is #1 again for the 2nd straight week.
Posted By: Charles (Guest) on October 12, 2008 at 08:59 PM
I'll let everyone know now that i enjoyed the movie very much. It gave me a thrill unlike most of the movies that are made. The camara man wasnt the greatest but it gave it that edge that it needed to be a good movie.
Posted By: Guest#9029 (Guest) on October 12, 2008 at 10:51 PM
You philistines should watch the original. So much better than this Hollywood dung.
Posted By: Chungles (Guest) on October 13, 2008 at 07:58 AM
I was thinking of catching a matinee for this, but the comment about "giving away the ending" made me go check the spoiler. Holy crap, the most iconic scene in the trailer is the ENDING, and they gave that away?!? Wow.
Man, I hate movie trailers.
Posted By: Ken B. (Guest) on October 13, 2008 at 11:48 AM
I can't wait to see this movie. It looks like it so totally rocks. I hope it at least half as good as The Happening, which is the best movie this year so far.
And yes, I'm so totally being honest.
Posted By: David (Guest) on October 13, 2008 at 03:00 PM
Jennifer Carpenter overacting??
You don't say!
Dexter is one of my favorite shows on TV, but is constantly being marred by having her appear in any scene whatsoever. She can't act, so instead yells and swears with no subtext to try to create a 'character.' The show is in it's third season and her character is just as shallow now as it was in episode one with no growth at all in the way she portrays her.
She couldn't act her way out of a paper bag, and it doesn't shock me that she's the weak link of what looks like could have been a pretty badass movie.
Posted By: JP (Guest) on October 13, 2008 at 05:57 PM
I saw the film and it was pretty much as you say, mediocre. [REC], the original, was better the camera was 3x steadier and that added so much for me, and the main actress while hystericalk was retarded.
Also the reasoning behind the virus was explained and creepy.
Posted By: C4 (Guest) on October 13, 2008 at 07:01 PM
man i like jeffrey harris and jeremy thomas sticking it to you terd balls leaving comments, f 411 mania commenters you all seem like a bunch of 5 year old girls
Posted By: viva la kylution (Guest) on October 13, 2008 at 10:39 PM
I just went to see this movie today 9/13 and it so not scary at all its pretty pointless you can pretty much predict what's fgoing to happen and yes jennifer did over do it, she made it so annoying and I'm usually afraid of scary movies I found myself actually laughing at how dumb the movie was. P.s the ending was stupid as well, didn't leave the theatre wanting more!
Posted By: Troy (Guest) on October 14, 2008 at 01:55 AM
I just saw this movie tonight. There was absolutely nothing scary or terrifying about it. Yeah the lead was perfect for the part and played it extremely well. If it weren't for my fiance. i would have walked out right after they saw the first "victim" in the upstairs. This is only my opinion but...to put it plainly...this movie sucked. the only good thing....when it ended. The lead, like i said before, Was perfect for the part....and again...she played it VERY well. Just to those who are reading this. If you want to take the chance and waste the money to see it....do so...i, however, will not be seeing this movie any time soon.
Posted By: guest (Guest) on October 15, 2008 at 12:27 AM
Not for nothing, but I REALLY ENJOYED THIS MOVIE! This movie combined horror and... humor? lol Yes I said it, HUMOR!!! XD When I went last night, the audience were involved with the movie, at times making fun of it, at times screaming their lungs out, and at times wondering what they're gonna do next. Even I found myself standing on-edge while watching this flick - and that's VERY RARE.
I do have to admit - I'm not a movie junkie. I didn't see Cloverfield, Blair Witch Project, [REC], so I can't compare this movie to those... but I will give it credit for using its creative P.O.V. to make the movie work.
I thought it was genius, and the main female lead did a great job. You are all forgetting that Angela is NOT A HERO!! She is not physically fit (skinny, yes), she is not trained in martial arts - she is a civilian. *Spoiler Alert* A lot of people loved the Firefighter Jake (oh he was SOO hot ^^;) but at the same time - he was trained to have the body to do all of the work. I wish he didn't die though... ='[ *End of Spoiler Alert*
And you all are complaining about the "steadying of the camera", but to me, it wasn't bad, and it heightened the mood of the story. The camera gives Scott a personality. The audience sees what he would "see".
My cousin told me before I went to NOT see the movie, that the ending was weak and was shown during the movie trailers. I do agree that it ended on a weak note, but is an ending that's most realistic. Let's face it - they weren't going to be left alive. Perhaps it opens up a sequel?? OO;
Posted By: Denmi-Sama (Guest) on October 19, 2008 at 05:23 PM