www.411mania.com
|  News |  Film Reviews |  Columns |  DVD/Other Reviews |  News Report | Search
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// [Gossip] Kim Kardashian Classes It Up For GQ
MUSIC
// Top Ten Albums from 2005
WRESTLING
// 411 PPV Roundtable Preview: WWE Survivor Series 2009
POLITICS
// 411 Politics RoundTable: Thoughts On The Ft. Hood Massacre
MMA
// 411's Roundtable Preview - UFC 106: Ortiz vs. Griffin 2
BOXING
// 411 Roundtable Preview: Kessler vs. Ward
GAMES
// Top 10 Action Role Playing Games




MOVIE REVIEW  MOVIE REVIEWS
//  The Twilight Saga: New Moon Review
//  Precious: Based on the Novel Push by Sapphire Review
//  Pirate Radio Review
//  Fantastic Mr. Fox Review
//  2012 Review
//  The House of the Devil Review
 HOT MOVIES
//  Iron Man 2
//  The Avengers
//  Watchmen
//  Transformers 2
//  Bruno
//  G.I. Joe
//  The Hobbit
SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds





Follow 411mania on Twitter!




Add 411 On Facebook
 



 
 411mania » Movies » Film Reviews
Advertisement
Saw V Review
Posted by Jeremy Thomas on 10.26.2008



Directed by: David Hackl
Written by: Patrick Melton & Marcus Dunstan

Starring:
Tobin Bell - John Kramer / Jigsaw
Julie Benz - Brit
Costas Mandylor - Mark Hoffman
Scott Patterson - Agent Peter Strahm
Betsy Russell - Jill Tuck
Mark Rolston - Dan Erickson
Carlo Rota - Charles
Greg Bryk - Mallick
Laura Gordon - Ashley
Joris Jarsky - Seth
Mike Butters - Paul Stallberg
Samantha Lemole - Pamela Jenkins
Sheila Shah - Agent Cowan
Meagan Good - Luba



Running Time: 88 minutes
Rated R for sequences of grisly bloody violence and torture, language and brief nudity

When it comes to Halloween, Saw films have become an unquestionable tradition. The horror series, which began on October 29th, 2004 with a little 1.2 million dollar film that blew box office expectations wide open, has become as reliable a Halloween event over the last several years as little kids dressing up for candy. Riding along on the strength one of the most fascinating villains of all time in Tobin Bell’s Jigsaw, the series has made $431 million worldwide on a mere total of $25.2 million and, unfortunately, kicked off the infamous “torture porn” subgenre that has drug horror into new lows of quality. With that level of profit, it’s no wonder to see why Lionsgate films and the producers are willing to keep this series going, even after it seemingly peaked with the third installment—both from a financial level and audience enjoyment. One wonders how the studio can keep bringing new movies out, particularly after the death of Jigsaw in the third film; however, they appear to have enough ideas to last through VI, which is slated for next year. This year, of course, we get Saw V, which hits theaters this weekend.

The film starts, after a scene which showcases one of Jigsaw’s infamous traps, directly after the events of both Saw III and IV. FBI Agent Straum (Patterson) has just shot the ill-fated hero of Saw III, Jeff, and is locked in the room he’s in by Jigsaw’s secret disciple, Detective Mark Hoffman (Mandylor). Straum finds a way out, but in doing so he falls into a new trap—one intended, unlike most of Jigsaw’s traps, to kill him without a chance to escape. However, he manages to outsmart the trap and gets away. Hoffman gets a medal and promotion for helping track down Jigsaw—or, as he’s now known to the world, John Kramer (Bell). Meanwhile, Jigsaw’s ex-wife Jill Tuck (Russell) is given a box from her late ex-husband, which instructions that she will know what to do with the contents. As Hoffman tries to go back to his life and fulfilling justice as he and Kramer knew it, he finds a note from someone that states “I know who you are.” Is it Straum, who seems suspicious of him? Is it Tuck? Or is it perhaps someone else? Hoffman must figure out who threatens his anonymity before they put an end to him. While all of this is going on, a group of five individuals—real estate agent Brit (Benz), reporter Charles (Rota), fire marshal Ashley (Gordon), city planner Luba (Good) and trust-fund rich boy Mallick (Bryk) awake to find themselves in a Jigsaw trap. It tells them they have all used their natural-born advantages to the ruination of others, and that they must go against their instincts to survive. The five must make their way through Jigsaw’s trademark death traps if they expect to survive and, as Kramer explains to Hoffman in one of the films many flashbacks, “find rehabilitation.”

The Saw series has always succeeded largely due to the character of John Kramer and the inventiveness of its sadistic traps. The fourth installment of the series was, with little dissention from its fan base, a let down from the previous films by carrying itself into a too-complex storyline in order to keep things going after the events of the third. The writers of that film were Patrick Melton & Marcus Dunstan, the duo who wrote the disgustingly funny horror film Feast, and they take up duty again with Saw V. Melton and Dunstan continue their habit of playing with time by essentially combining three story arcs into one; the efforts of Hoffman to evade Straum’s investigation, the progression of the five individuals through the traps, and flashbacks to show how Hoffman was found and trained by Kramer. While the duo create a story that falters in its progression and seems lost at times due to the jumping from one storyline to another, it is still a cleaner tale then IV, and they take great effort to tie up loose ends in the previous four films. For those who are fans of the first four, it is quite satisfying to see several questions answered, even if they are blatant use retroactive continuity (or, as comic book and film fans known it by, “retcon”). The script succeeds more often than not when it is focusing on the flashbacks or the trap game; when it comes to Hoffman and Straum’s storyline however, it seems to fall flat at times. The traps, a hallmark of the series are not as inventive as previous ones—you won’t see anything as visually impressive or complex as the “angel wing” trap from III or the draw and quarter trap in IV—but they are all still quite satisfying and carry Jigsaw’s hallmark ideals with them. In this aspect, the film does succeed where its core audience will want it to.

Unfortunately, where it fails is in the acting. While the performances from Tobin Bell and Betsy Russell are as top-notch as they have been in the previous films, the film falls upon Costas Mandylor and Scott Patterson to carry it. In that, they fail by virtue of disappointment. Mandylor has the unfavorable task of having to be compared to both Bell and Shawnee Smith, while Patterson has a long series of good guys to live up to, including Danny Glover, Donnie Wahlberg, and Dina Meyer. Neither succeeds, simply because their characters and acting chops are not up to the muster of their predecessors. Hoffman seems like too much of a thug to match the razor-sharp intelligence of John Kramer or the manipulative zeal of Amanda Young, and Mandylor plays him in such a way that it is nearly impossible to see him as anything above the level of a mafia tough guy—he’s certainly nowhere near the villainy level of the others. While he manages to redeem himself somewhat in the last moments of the film, it simply seems like too little too late, and one wonders how long the franchise can continue under Hoffman’s hand. Patterson, for his part, seems simply uninteresting as Straum. He made a perfectly serviceable supporting character in IV, but falters under the strain of having to carry the good guy role. He talks with an annoyingly raspy voice due to an injury suffered early in the film, and worse yet the raspiness seems to fluctuate in and out throughout the movie. Meanwhile, the five people in the trap are quite decent, with Benz and Bryk doing the best work as Brit and Mallick. None of them fall into the annoying habit of screaming wildly from trap to trap, and while they all seem to know the rules a bit overly much—and in fact, at times seem to eager to play by them—this is an acceptable situation, as at this point Jigsaw is well-known to the public at large.

The gore will be disappointing for fans going specifically to see that. One of the elements that has set Saw apart from the torture porn it inspired is the deeper meaning behind the gore, and in this film, director David Hackl focuses more on the meaning then the visuals. While a very early trap—the “crowd pleaser” opening one—is quite cringe-worthy and the final two traps (one for the quintet, one for someone else) will provoke some squirms, the focus is clearly more on the traps and solving them then the bloody results. This works to the films benefit and, while audiences wanted blood and intestines and other such sundries may be disappointed, it results in a somewhat more satisfying experience then it could have.


The 411: The biggest problem with Saw V is simply that it has run out of interesting characters to focus on. As the series moves further and further away from the death of Tobin Bell's Jigsaw in Saw III, the ability to keep bringing him back becomes more and more difficult, and Costas Mandylor's Hoffman appears to be unsuited to the task of picking up the slack. The traps are good and the storyline is cleaner and less gimmicky then the fourth film, giving the movie a chance to succeed, but the poor acting by both Mandylor and Scott Patterson as Agent Straum drags this film down from the heights that it could have acheived. Saw VI is already slated to come out next year, and while the last scene with Hoffman gives me hope that the franchise could become great again, Saw V falls into the category of a slightly above-average horror film and a disappointing entry into the once-great franchise.
 
Final Score:  6.5   [ Average ]  legend


Post Comment (23)  |  Email Jeremy Thomas  |  View Jeremy Thomas's 411 Profile

  Send To Friend  |    Stumble It!  |    Digg It!  | 



Please add your comment below.
If you are registered, you can login and post under your registered name. If not, you can post as a guest or register.

* Please note that 411 moderates all comments. Your comment will show up on the site after it has been approved by an editor.
 
Name : 
Comment : 
Remaining Characters : 
2800
 

Comments (23)

 
Did you believe how it ends?

Posted By: you won't (Guest)  on October 26, 2008 at 12:08 AM

 
 
Gotta disagree, this movie was not good. I'd give it a 3. Flashbacks were terrible and the acting was worse. Not a good movie.

Posted By: mark19 (Guest)  on October 26, 2008 at 12:51 AM

 
 
ok you guys, no BSing me, how did it end?

Posted By: (guest) (Guest)  on October 26, 2008 at 12:57 AM

 
 
I nearly gave up after SAW III, Saw IV confused the crap out of me.. I won't be seeing Saw V.

Posted By: Tobin Bell (Guest)  on October 26, 2008 at 01:07 AM

 
 
Personally, it just didnt have the same bite as previous entries. The traps were easy to figure out, but that could also be because Jigsaws motives have been so lovenly delved into that we all grasp the concept quickly and are supposed to hope those on-screen will do so also. Somewhat effective. I loved the smug cockiness of Hoffman(Costas Mandylor) and the movie itself didnt really suck...it just stifles whenever Jigsaw isn't on-screen. Everyone will agree that the characters arent as interesting as in the other installments. On a positive note, 6 seems to be the big reveal for someone or something so there is still hope. My prediction: Riggs will play into it somehow. Saw 5 was interesting not because of who was in it....but because of who wasn't.

Posted By: Mel (Guest)  on October 26, 2008 at 01:40 AM

 
 
Last trap = awesome.

And while Patterson's performance wasn't great, I still loved the film. I love the fact that they've set up the final film with seemingly only two people knowing who the new Jigsaw is -- and one of them is Hoffman himself. (Watch the film; it becomes obvious who the other person is.)

*SPOILER*

And hey, look at it this way, Jeremy -- you don't have to worry about Straum coming back for the grand finale. ;)

*END SPOILER*


Posted By: Anonymous Film Critic (Guest)  on October 26, 2008 at 02:03 AM

 
 
Well I for one really enjoyed it. The storyline kept me hooked and there was enough suspense and intrigue to keep my attention.

The acting wasnt great but then neither was the acting that brilliant in the first Saw - Leigh Wannell anyone?

I have loved this franchise from start to finish - mainly because of the excellent Jigsaw character.


Posted By: Mikey (Guest)  on October 26, 2008 at 06:31 AM

 
 
The bad guy narrowly gets away again. Save your money, wait for DVD

Posted By: xLx (Guest)  on October 26, 2008 at 11:54 AM

 
 
Just a minor detail, but in the rating it states that there is brief nudity. Now I don't recall seeing any nudity whatsoever. No Tits, No Ass, No Coochie, nothing at all. There wasn't even any dudity (not that I am complaining about that).

Anyone want to refresh my memory as to where it was? or am I right and there was no nudity at all?


Posted By: Guest#1889 (Guest)  on October 26, 2008 at 01:30 PM

 
 
I agree about the lack of interesting characters, as they keep killing off the decent ones (Rigg, Matthews, etc). Normally a horror franchise is dead in the water after this many installments, but I still thought it was watchable, though not as solid as the others.

Posted By: Jordan Bruns (Registered)  on October 26, 2008 at 01:31 PM

 
 
i sort of agree with the person with Jeremy.after the death of jigsaw it seems like their running out of interesting characters and always have to flashback to previous ones.am i the only one who thinks all the evens ones like saw 2 and 4 are good?

Posted By: movie critic (Guest)  on October 26, 2008 at 01:36 PM

 
 
Very Neat how the movie begins exactly where 3&4 ended.. Also very nice how they connect every lil thing. Remember in Saw 1 where Det. Tapp found the warehouse because of a fire alarm? Could this b connected to that fire that killed the 8 people?

Posted By: White Mike (Guest)  on October 26, 2008 at 02:29 PM

 
 
Since they already announced a part 6, I saw the ending coming a mile a way. Watchable, not as good as the others.

BTW I actually liked part 4.


Posted By: Blah (Guest)  on October 26, 2008 at 03:32 PM

 
 
I don't remember hearing about there being any brief nudity, Guest #1889, but if there was supposed to be brief nudity, my vote would be to see that black chick or the white chick topless. They look like they had nice knockers.

Oh yeah, the Saw series is losing steam.


Posted By: Zingy (Guest)  on October 26, 2008 at 03:35 PM

 
 
'You won't believe how it ends'

But it doesn't 'end' it's getting another sequel. Is that what I'm not going to believe? That they didn't end it?


Posted By: KR (Guest)  on October 26, 2008 at 07:33 PM

 
 
You Won't Believe How It Ends

One, it's talking about the individual movie, not the series.
Two, I believe and hope that 6 is the last film.

Now, I quite enjoyed the film, although not as great as I-III (IV can be questionable) it was still a good movie. I didn't believe where it ended. Although I knew it would continue, for it to be so WIDE open was much unexpected. There were in fact 3 storylines, Traps, Flashback, and Hoffman & Straum. The flashbacks partially confused me, but I think I caught were one ended and the other began.

For those going for who like the multiple people working together from Saw II you'll more than likely enjoy the 4 traps that the 5 characters must endeavor.

For those questioning "Breif Nudity" I believe this was in the reason for rating because of...

*SPOILER START*

... because of when they were at the crime scene of Hoffman's sister...

*SPOILER END*

Since I am pretty leniant for what goes on in a plot of a movie/series I enjoy, I have to say that the movie was farily decent. All I can say is don't blow off the 6th film just because you don't like this one. The 6th one is sure to sum up the things that bothered you, although in the end if you don't want to go, don't force yourself, but also remember there isn't just Saw V, it's one story, and if you don't follow it to the end, then you can only say that it sucked.

Not to force anything on you, but just think. What if you hated a certain sequel to a movie (Saw V for instance)and chose not to see the following films. Well then you are now ending it not knowing the whole story, which makes it unfair to just critize it for what you know.

Another way this is shown, is when people critcize others for knowing one little fact (they smoke for instance), and automatticaly put them under a sterotype. They just judged a person unfairly.

If you don't want to see Saw VI then at least do us fans the favor of not bashing about how horribly it "ended" when you don't even know how it REALLY ended.

~Blaine Miaso Inagaki (Online Alias)
~SoulMasacare (YouTube)
~GaarasGuardian (FanFiction)


Posted By: Blaine Inagaki (Guest)  on October 26, 2008 at 08:30 PM

 
 
This was the Best sequel yet. I have NO idea what you saw- yes Hoffman STINKS as an actor- and it DID start slow- but from 2-5 this is the best one.

Posted By: ncshvdavid (Guest)  on October 26, 2008 at 10:41 PM

 
 
Shit Sandwich.

Posted By: Guest#5583 (Guest)  on October 26, 2008 at 10:45 PM

 
 
Me and the missus watched this on Friday and were pretty disappointed. I had watch all the Saws in the space of a month before this, and Saw 4 the night before. I felt that Saw V was kinda pointless - I've always liked the Saws with their twists (it's why I liked the first 3 especially). This movie didn't have much of a twist and the flashbacks were kinda obvious (wow the guy helped Jigsaw set up the traps in Saw 2). The Saw series seems to have gone downhill as soon as Jigsaw died.

I can't wait for Saw 6 hopefully. Looking for a much better story than this.


Posted By: AH (Guest)  on October 27, 2008 at 07:05 AM

 
 
Can anyone tell me the exact details of the "brief nudity"? Is it male or female? I dont want to see the movie if it has any offensive nude scenes...

Posted By: zen222 (Guest)  on October 27, 2008 at 01:55 PM

 
 
As a fan of the Saw franchise, I gotta say that I was disappointed by numero cinco...I thought it was the weakest of the bunch, and the so called "twist" at the end pales in comparison to the ones found in the other saw movies. Overall I'd give it a 4-5 out of 10.

Posted By: Guest007 (Guest)  on October 27, 2008 at 05:47 PM

 
 
The glass box scene in the end, I guessed it. I knew something bad was gonna happen in the room, and I knew that box could have saved Straum. Jigsaw isn't a killer, he we all need to learn to trust him!!! Remember in the 3rd movie, he asks that cop to wait until the time runs out, and he will see his son safe and sound.

Anyways, what's in the box given to Jill Tuck? Something to do with Straum?

0_0


Posted By: Guest (Guest)  on October 27, 2008 at 07:37 PM

 
 
This movie just sucks. It has no redeeming features at all. One of the worst films of the year.

Posted By: chikaraking (Guest)  on November 16, 2008 at 06:33 PM

 


www.41mania.com
Copyright © 2005 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.