The Curious Case Of Benjamin Button Review
Posted by Jeffrey Harris on 12.25.2008
A movie that reflects all those wonderful, sometimes tragic, and sometimes beautiful things about life.
THE CURIOUS CASE OF BENJAMIN BUTTON
Directed By: David Fincher Written By: Eric Roth; Story by Eric Roth and Robin Swicord; Based on the short story by F. Scott Fitzgerald Runtime: 168 minutes MPAA Rating: Rated PG-13 for brief war violence, sexual content, language and smoking. Official Website: http://www.benjaminbutton.com/
Benjamin Button - Brad Pitt Daisy - Cate Blanchett Caroline - Julia Ormond Queenie - Taraji Henson Tizzy Weathers - Mahershalalhashbaz Ali Thomas Button - Jason Flemyng Captain Mike - Jared Harris Elizabeth Abbott - Tilda Swinton Monsieur Gateau - Elias Koteas
The setting for the screening of the movie, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, at the Paramount Theatre could not have been more hauntingly appropriate. The clouds were raging, and the rain was coming down hard -- a rare occurrence here in Los Angeles. The weather outside one of Hollywood's oldest studio lots seemed to reference the movie and history, recalling the haunting imagery of Hurricane Katrina which serves as the backdrop and narrative framing device for the mega-budgeted prestige picture from Paramount Pictures and Warner Bros.
The journey of the F. Scott Fitzgerald short story, written in the 1920's, toward adaptation into a theatrical feature is an interesting one. The basic gist, a man who is born old and ages backwards, sounds like a high concept Hollywood flick waiting to happen. But it would take many years for everything to come into place. Director David Fincher, following his excellent crime drama in Zodiac, took the heavy task upon himself to bring the story of Benjamin Button to the screen after screenwriters Eric Roth and Robin Swicord toiled on it for years.
The story begins with Caroline (Ormond) tending to her dying mother, Daisy (Blanchett), in a hospital in New Orleans, LA. While the word "Katrina" is never specifically stated, the idea is well understood as the story puts the action right into New Orleans hours before the destructive flood. Daisy, in what are likely her last moments, asks Caroline to read to her from a book. The book is actually a diary containing the last will and testament and story of Benjamin Button (Pitt).
The narration transitions to the voice of Pitt as Benjamin, and we learn the tale of his birth at the end of The Great War in 1918. Benjamin's birth mother, Caroline, tragically passes from the delivery. Benjamin's father, the button maker Thomas (Flemyng), is horrified by the sight of his newborn infant son. Tense and with emotion, Thomas flees with the baby. In a fit of mercy from the last dying wish of Thomas' wife, Benjamin is left on the doorstep of an old folks' home. There, Benjamin is discovered by the home's caretaker, Queenie (Henson), and the home's chef who is Queenie's lover, Tizzy (Ali). Benjamin is no ordinary infant. While his size is equal to that of an average baby, his body shows all the signs and physical attributes of a man well into his '80's. Queenie, apparently unable to bear a child, decides to take Benjamin under her care to raise as her own. Benjamin actually fits right in with the company of the older folks, many of whom don't have much time left either.
Gradually, Benjamin grows into the full body of an old man. However, his hair starts growing out, and he gets stronger and more virile. He also meets Daisy and falls in love with her at first sight. Daisy looks her age, and Benjamin does not, and that causes some problems.
What one can take more than anything from this story as adapted by Fincher and Roth -- and this could be totally wrong -- is that despite the "unusual circumstances" of Benjamin's birth and his aging, Benjamin’s life is not so much different from our own. Even with the appearance of being elderly, Benjamin begins a naive love affair with an older woman, Elizabeth Abbott (Swinton) during his days as a sailor from his late teens to his early 20's. Benjamin is educated about life by adults -- much as we are. Perhaps, one should not say that Benjamin's life is not extraordinary, because extraordinary things can happen in our lives even if though it might not seem that way to others. Benjamin experiences love and loss much the same way that people do every day. Aging backwards or not, Benjamin faces the same decisions, choices, and travels many of the same paths in life that everyone in life ultimately faces. Fincher and Roth have essentially, in much the opposite manner of Fitzgerald's story which embraced the absurdity of the scenario, captured the reality of such a situation . . . if that is at all possible. People are born, we age, we laugh, we cry, and we die. Benjamin Button is no different, and while his body physically goes in reverse, he ages mentally the same as us.
While Fincher generally goes more for the realism of the situations, the movie does have a few flights of fancy. First is the interesting prologue story about Mr. Gateau (formerly Casey Jones, Koteas), a blind clockmaker who makes a clock that goes backwards in the anguish of the loss of his son in The Great War. There is also a repeating interlude with a man who recalls the times he has been struck by lightning on seven occasions, each time depicted with a vintage old-time film clip showing the man in his youth being struck by lightning in random situations. The imagery in some of these sequences appears almost abstract, but Fincher still manages to blend them well into his narrative.
The performances are all fun to watch. Pitt, as Benjamin, is at his most gentlemanly and likable self of his career. He embraces everything that is important about the character and never succumbs to mugging as Tom Cruise still does. This is noted because at one point this was a role that Tom Cruise highly coveted. Cate Blanchett is fantastic as Daisy and captures the character amazingly throughout the decades. Jared Harris delightfully chews up the screen as the crusty Captain Mike, Benjamin's tugboat Captain who mentors Benjamin into the ways of sex with the ladies and early manhood.
The technical wizardry of the aging of not only characters such as Benjamin but also Daisy and Queenie, is 100% perfect and looks absolutely seamless. There is really no way you can tell they are plastering Pitt's face on a body double or that Pitt is wearing make-up at all -- even as Benjamin grows into the body of a young man in his 20's and then late teens.
The production design and ambition of depicting New Orleans throughout most of the 21st century is spectacular. This is another departure from the story since Fitzgerald's work was set in Baltimore. There are many other impressive set pieces and locations that Benjamin visits such as Russia in the '40's, and Paris and New York in the '50's, while New Orleans remains the home he always returns to.
The movie does feel long at a robust, nearly 3 hour runtime. But there's very little in the movie you would imagine or want to be removed. Movies shouldn't always be a quick, disposable experience.
The 411: Fincher has really made something special here. While it is somewhat early to call this a classic or one of the best movies ever, The Curious Case Of Benjamin Button is most definitely a fine, well-made picture. A movie that's just as much of a reflection of life experiences of happiness, sadness, pain, loss, and joy -- that bitter sweetness that makes life so special.
Posted By: I' m Just Sayin' (Guest) on December 25, 2008 at 08:35 AM
Too bad the message of the film has nothing to do with the source material's message.
Burn in hell, Fincher and Pitt.
Posted By: BK (Guest) on December 25, 2008 at 09:48 AM
I gave my old clothes to my old friends
Posted By: Bowflex (Guest) on December 25, 2008 at 12:00 PM
i saw it, it was alright, but too damn long. I mean shit, i liked the story aand all but almost 3 hours aint my cup of tea
Posted By: Guest#7474 (Guest) on December 25, 2008 at 06:39 PM
It was a little less than three hours.
I understand that people who like the Fitzgerald story might not like this movie. This movie is very different from the short story. The short story sort of embraces the humor and farce of the scenario, while the movie plays it very straight and dramatic.
Posted By: Jeffrey Harris (Registered) on December 26, 2008 at 12:45 AM
just because its like 12 hours long doesnt mean its good... id give it a 4/10... wait for it to be on abc on a sunday night with the kiddies
Posted By: Guest#0258 (Guest) on December 26, 2008 at 02:24 AM
Just saw the film last night and liked it. It's got some very poignant moments and is a thoughtful reflection on life and love. The aging backwards is an unusual technique but not a distracting one, as some would have us believe, and ultimately the film stays with you, and you leave the theater reflecting on your own mortality, grateful for the time you do have...
Posted By: kushka53 (Guest) on December 26, 2008 at 12:19 PM
I haven't seen it yet, but the fact that people are giving it the same reaction as they gave ROTK (too long, wah wah wah) simply means my expectations have risen. As Jeffrey said, not all movies need to be short. Some people actually enjoy watching movies, so the longer a movie is the greater the experience.
Posted By: Mattheapar (Guest) on December 26, 2008 at 04:48 PM
This was a flawlessly made movie. Everything fit perfectly, from the acting to the music to the way it was shot... even to the running length. Anyone who went into this expecting a disposable 90 minute movie clearly didn't do their homework, and anyone who faults it for not being exactly like the SHORT STORY source material (burn in hell? really? wow.) clearly doesn't appreciate artistic license. Brad Pitt is a fine actor, Cate Blanchett always has an almost otherworldly beauty, and David Fincher might be the most consistently excellent director of this era. I realize that praise almost sounds ridiculous, but this truly was something to appreciate and just take in.
Posted By: Guest#8084 (Guest) on December 27, 2008 at 03:02 AM
Could the point of the story been shoved down my throat any more? I mean the last half of the movie was just repeating the point over and over and over.
I think the worst part were the emotionless main characters. They didn't make me care whatever happened to them PLUS if they were trying to make it a love story....where was the love between them expect for the house montage, otherwise it seemed cold and distant/awkward.
For those who complain that it was too long, it's a movie about AGING and TIME, these same people would have complained if the movie was only hour and a half or 2 hours because they didn't show enough of his aging and life.
Posted By: Apple (Guest) on December 27, 2008 at 03:45 PM
I quite enjoyed this movie,
and while being aware that it was long, I didn't feel the time was tedious. It is certainly not for action film junkies.
In my mind I think there could have been a few scenes cut slightly shorter but taking 3-4 minutes off a 2hr 45 min film was not going to make it much shorter and anything more may have changed the flow of the movie.
I'd give it an 8.5 out of 10
Posted By: CK (Guest) on January 01, 2009 at 05:50 PM
Copyright � 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.