Posted By: Mario (Guest) on March 15, 2008 at 04:36 AM
I second the terrible motion... on both films.
Posted By: Show'Chi Tyler (Registered) on March 15, 2008 at 12:10 PM
I dunno.. It looks kinda fun..
Posted By: Bolton (Guest) on March 15, 2008 at 12:32 PM
I concur
Posted By: Guest#6517 (Guest) on March 15, 2008 at 01:43 PM
terrible?? have you no sense of something exciting? does everything have to be so ridiculously oscar-worthy to receive any real praise on this sight?? Hulk looks totally awesome...the Ang Lee film wasn't even THAT bad in my eyes, but i believe Norton can bring about something amazing with the film...and Speed Race is meant to be a fuel-injected piece of film eye candy...which it is, and looks pretty rad...so stop being such a tool and enjoy a fun flick now and then
Posted By: Erik (Guest) on March 15, 2008 at 04:45 PM
i agree with eric, the hulk is being played by the guy from fight club, i am currntly trying to remember his name, but i am having abrain fart. the hulk looks awsome
speed racer looks like a popcorn movie thaT will be filed with a lot of ohhs and ahhs
Posted By: juantonzoup (Guest) on March 15, 2008 at 05:39 PM
Hulk looks like it may have potential. At least the Hulk itself looks a lot better this time around, although it still looks a bit plasticky. Last time around the Hulk was done in such a way it looked like a cartoon. However this turns out it will be better then that.
Speedracer looks awful.
Posted By: Fenris (Guest) on March 15, 2008 at 06:32 PM
I think that Speed Racer looks terribly fun.
I liked the first half of the old Hulk. You know, when it was just the Hulk running from the army. The latter half, I could have done without. This one looks alright, but I'm missing Sam Elliot as Thunderbolt Ross.
Posted By: G-Walla (Guest) on March 15, 2008 at 07:12 PM
Speed Racer is awesome. Hulk looks ok.
Posted By: Rufus R Jones (Guest) on March 15, 2008 at 08:10 PM
first rule of hulk club dont make him angry.... it looks like they used the same computer effects people from the last hulk film. it looks a little too cartoony. they should have got the guys from transformers,those were more realistic looking than the hulk is. yes i know neither are real but you think they could have done a better job
Posted By: gutter (Guest) on March 16, 2008 at 03:58 AM
Why can't people just enjoy movies for what they are? Escapism!! Not all movies are meant to be Shakespeare. Just go to the film wanting to be entertained for a couple of hours and maybe you will be. Stop looking for the be all end all movie and have fun. I, for one, am going to go see Hulk and enjoy some fantasy and have fun. Will it be the best movie ever? Most likely not. But will I have fun? Most likely yes!!
Posted By: Dave (Guest) on March 16, 2008 at 06:08 PM
Does Speed Racer take place in some kid's drug-induced psyhodelic nightmare world? That looks like total crap!
Posted By: What the F? (Guest) on March 17, 2008 at 02:33 PM
Hulk still looks like he's made of foam.
Posted By: hulking shmoe (Guest) on March 17, 2008 at 02:37 PM
I think instead of spending the money at the theater on this flick I'll take that money and buy lemons. Once I have the lemons i'll squeeze all the juice into my eyes and play with razor blades. That would be more fun that this crappy movie.
Posted By: chris (Guest) on April 07, 2008 at 07:51 AM
