[Gossip] Miley Cyrus "Embarrassed" Over Topless Photos
Posted by Ashish on 04.28.2008
Vanity Fair defends photos, Disney says magazine took advantage of 15 year old...
15 year old Disney star Miley Cyrus is "embarrassed" over an upcoming photo spread in Vanity Fair Magazine where she appears semi-topless.
"I took part in a photo shoot that was supposed to be 'artistic' and now, seeing the photographs and reading the story, I feel so embarrassed," she tells ET. "I never intended for any of this to happen and I apologize to my fans who I care so deeply about."
Vanity Fair is defending the photos:"Miley's parents and/or minders were on the set all day. Since the photo was taken digitally, they saw it on the shoot and everyone thought it was a beautiful and natural portrait of Miley. In fact, when BRUCE HANDY interviewed Miley, he asked her about the photo and she was very cheerful about it and thought it was perfectly fine."
However, a Disney Channel spokesperson says: "Unfortunately, as the article suggests, a situation was created to deliberately manipulate a 15-year-old in order to sell magazines."
The magazine hits stores next week. We'll post the photos as soon as we get them.
wait a sec shes mad that vanity fair took pics of her semi topless... so then why the fuck agree to pose for them?
and who the fuck at vanity fair thought it was a good idea to do this spread? who wants to see provocative pix of a 15 year year old? thats a highschool freshmans age
Posted By: Guest#8920 (Guest) on April 28, 2008 at 01:31 AM
I do. I want to see it.
Posted By: Joel Yeomans (Registered) on April 28, 2008 at 02:32 AM
That's hella nasty!
Posted By: Guest#5507 (Guest) on April 28, 2008 at 06:11 AM
I think this goes to prove that marketing and ad agencies are scumbags who'd pimp out a (admittedly stupid for going along with it then turning around and being upset) 15 year old girl for sales...either that or this world is full of paedo's who actually want to see that shit.
Posted By: Will 1337 (Guest) on April 28, 2008 at 08:50 AM
Fifteen is old enough for me. Show me the pics, give me five minutes with her bag, then I'm taking her to a hotel for room service. (poses)
Posted By: Randy Orton (Guest) on April 28, 2008 at 09:49 AM
Brilliant PR move on Disney's part. They know there's a segment of her fanbase who wants to see these... this way, they can deliver and still maintain her squeeky-clean image. Of course, Vanity Fair looks bad, but can claim they did everything by the book with the people there. The real winners in this situation: Internet pervs.
Posted By: Peers (Guest) on April 28, 2008 at 09:51 AM
she could be 21...I still think she's funny looking. PASS!
Posted By: FEAR (Guest) on April 28, 2008 at 10:04 AM
she isn't mad at all. she just suddenly realized oh shit i could lose the Disney gig and this could turn into bad press. Upon this realization she decided to go into damage control mode and made those comments, i'd bet anything she loves the pictures and will have them framed on her wall, however neither she nor her father is stupid and they will stand by and watch people attack vanity fair.
Posted By: stronelis (Guest) on April 28, 2008 at 10:23 AM
Will 1337 and Peers must be gay. They act like 15 is 12. The people who cry "pedo" all the time like this are the ones who are looking at baby porn secretly every night in their moms basement.
Posted By: DieHomos (Guest) on April 28, 2008 at 10:26 AM
The photos are on the net now.
BTW, Did South Park call it or not?!
Posted By: Jamal (Guest) on April 28, 2008 at 10:28 AM
Please. You can't see a god damn thing in those photos except part of her back. It really comes off to me in the article as though Miley was perfecly okay with the pictures - as was said, her folks were on-set and they all saw the pics as they were taken - but that Disney are the ones who're bullying her into apologizing for them. It's sort of a backwards way of generating PR. If anything, Disney are the scumbags here for stirring up controversy that doesn't exist.
Posted By: BJC (Guest) on April 28, 2008 at 10:28 AM
And let's not forget that Billy Ray Cyrus was there when the pics were taken. If they were taking advantage of his little girl, he should have stepped in. Unless he was whackin the pud.
Posted By: Satan (Guest) on April 28, 2008 at 10:32 AM
via South park-
I think the harvest is about ready.
Posted By: rey (Guest) on April 28, 2008 at 11:22 AM
I just read the creepiest comment ever. Until I realized it was written by Randy Orton.
Posted By: Guest#5298 (Guest) on April 28, 2008 at 11:34 AM
somebody call chris hanson
Posted By: Guest#6055 (Guest) on April 28, 2008 at 01:47 PM
To those who want to see naked pictures of a 15 yr old girl:
A pedophile is a pedophile and you should be profoundly ashamed.
Posted By: Michael (Guest) on April 28, 2008 at 02:40 PM
whore...
Posted By: Guest#1985 (Guest) on April 28, 2008 at 07:41 PM
A 15-year old girl? Semi-topless? Photographed for a magazine? Ummm... Isn't that illegal? Or do these shoots not count as sexually suggestive?
Posted By: Vinz (Guest) on April 29, 2008 at 04:21 AM
