www.411mania.com
|  News |  Album Reviews |  Columns |  News Report |  Hall Of Fame |
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// Star Wars Episode I Brings In $1.1 Million in Midnight Showings
MUSIC
// First Official Pics of Beyonce and Jay-Z With Blue Ivy Posted
WRESTLING
// Impact Wrestling Rating
POLITICS
// Obama Showing Strongest Poll Numbers In Months
MMA
// Dustin Poirier vs. Chan Sung Jung To Main Event UFC on F/X 3
GAMES
// Star Trek Sequel Game in the Works


CD REVIEWS  CD REVIEWS
//  Hospitality - Hospitality Review
//  Sharon Van Etten - Tramp Review
//  Air - La Voyage Dans Le Lune Review
//  Imperial Teen - Feel The Sound Review
//  Seal - Soul 2 Review
//  Craig Finn - Clear Heart Full Eyes Review
 HOT ARTISTS
//  Kanye West
//  Lil Wayne
//  Rihanna
//  Britney Spears
//  Lady GaGa
SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds





Follow 411mania on Twitter!




Add 411 On Facebook
 



 
 411mania » Music » Album Reviews



Advertisement
The Whigs - In the Dark Review
Posted by Aaron Mayagoitia on 03.14.2010





The accolade


The Athens, Georgia band known as The Whigs is described by The New York Times as “Two-chord guitar and drums furor worthy of The Who”, which is enough to make you think that The Whigs are a rock fan’s dream. But after listening to the band’s third album In the Dark, such a lofty description becomes exaggerated. The Whigs do make extensive use of the most basic sonic tools, but to compare them to one of the most exciting rock bands in history is misleading since on extremely few occasions does the music on In the Dark deliver exciting or enduring moments. Erroneous comparison aside, In the Dark is a boring rock album that won’t surprise you, entertain you or leave you wanting more. If anything, it will only have you waiting for the album’s running time to end.

Bits and pieces


The salvageable aspects of In the Dark are few and scattered throughout; you may find a catchy chorus, a cool bass line, or a tasty lick here and there, but they are not strong enough to make songs stand on their own, much less give way to a strong album. When the music is at its best is when an early-U2 vibe of propulsive drums, chiming guitar, fluid bass lines and soaring vocals takes over, but that doesn’t happen very often or for too long. Frontman Parker Gispert sings most of the time in a soothing voice you wish he would take to higher places, and his guitar-playing only occasionally has traces of enthusiasm; drummer Julian Dorio’s approach is unimpressive; bassist Timothy Deaux does a good job filling the empty spaces with melodic bass lines. Lyrically, the songs range from average to humorous.

What’s the good stuff like?


Even though there are not many outstanding songs on In the Dark, those that work are jangly, catchy rock confections. “Kill Me Carolyne” is the album’s best song because it sounds like time was spent putting it together – unlike other songs that sound like demos, not because of the recording quality, but because of their thin, unfinished feel. “Black Lotus” has a certain sunny radiance to it that the rest of the album lacks. “Hundred / Million” has an irresistible chorus that keeps the song from being filler. And that’s basically it. Only three songs on In the Dark are worthwhile, the rest range from forgettable to barely good. Are those three songs good enough to make you seek out the album? No. Just go ahead and download “Kill Me Carolyne” from the band’s MySpace page and you’ll be fine.

The good, the bad and the highlights:


The good are the three good tracks on the album which also happen to be the highlights. Jangly guitars, melodic bass lines and catchy choruses are what make these songs work. “Kill Me Carolyne” is the album’s winner because of its outstanding craft and because it features the album’s best vocal performance. Unfortunately, the rest of the album is not up to par with this type of quality.

The bad is the rest of the album. The songs sound half-baked, lazy and unimpressive, not to mention that they sound unfinished and thin. There may be a certain element here and there that spices up even the worst song on the album, but it’s not enough to make them any good. Being that the best songs are at the beginning of the album, listening to the rest of it is a boring experience.

The highlights are:

Hundred / Million: A laid-back vibe and catchy chorus make this one shine.

Black Lotus: Like driving next to the beach on a sunny afternoon.

Kill Me Carolyne: The only song you should care about. Download it.

What else is on?


Here are The Whigs playing the Late Show:



Yawn…


In the Dark is a poor album you should avoid. There are way more bad songs than good songs on it and the good ones aren’t that good. The most noticeable flaw In the Dark has is that it feels like a collection of uninspired demos. Hooks and melody are what makes three songs on the album stand out. This is the type of album that marks a band’s decline.



Two out of three ain’t bad


As a special bonus, here are two of the best songs on In the Dark (“Kill Me Carolyne” and “Hundred / Million”):












The 411: The Whigs have failed to deliver with In the Dark. It is boring and sounds like a collection of uninspired demos. There is only one outstanding track on the album you’d be better off downloading separately. Otherwise stay away from this flop.
 
Final Score:  4.5   [ Poor ]  legend


Post Comment (7)  |  Email Aaron Mayagoitia  |  View Aaron Mayagoitia's 411 Profile

  Send To Friend  |    Stumble It!  |    Digg It!  | 



Please add your comment below.
If you are registered, you can login and post under your registered name. If not, you can post as a guest or register.

* Please note that 411 moderates all comments. Your comment will show up on the site after it has been approved by an editor.
 
Name : 
Comment : 
Remaining Characters : 
2800
 

Comments (7)

 
This album doesn't seem to be receiving good reviews, but The Whigs definitely have good albums in them. Check out their first two, "Give Em All A Big Fat Lip" and "Mission Control" or at least give "Right Hand on My Heart" a sample listen.

Posted By: Berenstein Von Raschke (Registered)  on March 14, 2010 at 01:07 AM

 
 
Aaron. You are fucking retarded. Obviously, you either haven't listened to this album, or you don't know what good music sounds like. My guess is the latter. You think there is nothing interesting or satisfying about "I Am for Real" of "Someone's Daughter?" Or did you just listen to the first 3 tracks so you could go ahead and get to bashing? What's average to humorous is the fact that you consider yourself a rock critic.

Everyone else, this is a really solid album. The Whigs have certainly changed their sound a little, but they are a different band now. And see these guys live! Absolutely rippin'.


Posted By: Jason (Guest)  on March 15, 2010 at 02:55 AM

 
 
Yea you really dont know what your talking about. i compare this album to Kings of leon's because of the times. its very experimental and very good. kill me carolyne is clearly influenced by sex on fire haha. yea i love this album and im not gonna listen to this guy who bullshited the review by not giving any examples of the "poor music". how about listen to the whole album you stupid fuck.

Posted By: Eric (Guest)  on March 16, 2010 at 02:48 AM

 
 
Okay, just listened to it and its pretty damned good. "Black Lotus" and "I Don't Even Care About The One I Love" stood out on that first listen but nothing at all was "bad". Def. sample this album.

Posted By: Berenstein Von Raschke (Registered)  on March 16, 2010 at 02:59 AM

 
 
I REALLY liked the Whigs first 2 albums & I mean a lot. Some of the best TRUE original rock to come out of the south in the past 5 years but for me the jury is still WAY out for "In the Dark" I understand that bands go in different directions sometimes but I'm just not feeling it on this album, maybe it'll grow on me some more, I certinaly hope so. I like KOL a lot too but please don't try to say this is an excellent album b/c it doesn't even compare to the first two. They lost their first bass player who I belive was absolutely paramount (obviously) in the song writing process, along with Parker. Too much flow & not enough break downs like the Whigs of old. Just my 2 cents.

Posted By: Hunter (Guest)  on March 18, 2010 at 06:10 PM

 
 
Good lord that was a harsh review!! I've been a huge Whigs fan for a few years now, and I've got to say this is a solid album. It's a bit of a departure from there older stuff, but in a logical way I'd say. You can tell these are songs that were written on the road. These guys have been touring non-stop for close to 4 years!! They're just bashing the shit out of everything, but not in a bad way. There are a lot of very strong chorus' on this album. I Don't Even Care About The One I Love, Black Lotus, It's Automatic, Naked, In The Dark, Hundred / Million, Kill Me Caroline.

If there is one fault to this record I'd say it came on the mixing of it. The guitars are waaaaaay too loud and it's gets a bit tiring to listen to. Not enough chilled out moments like they've on previous records.

That said, see them live!!!! I've converted several people by dragging them out to a concert.


Posted By: Paul (Guest)  on March 18, 2010 at 10:28 PM

 
 
The poor reviews are correct - this album seems terrible. I've only listened to it twice now (and the "good songs" a couple times extra) but wow, it's bad. The Whigs had two great albums before this in my opinion, but this is a significant decline. The hooks, transitions, riffs and melodies are weak at best. Kill Me Carolyn wouldn't be a standout song on one of their previous albums, yet it's the best on here? 3/10.

Posted By: tubes (Guest)  on September 07, 2010 at 04:14 PM

 


www.41mania.com
Copyright � 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.