Metallica - Death Magnetic Review
Posted by Jeff Modzelewski on 09.11.2008
Another shot at redemption from the biggest heavy metal band in the world. Does the album measure up, or is it just musical suicide?
For me, Metallica’s “Death Magnetic” album represented a real opportunity for this band to earn back their fanbase. Metallica was the band that brought so many people (myself included) into heavy music. Their first four albums represent the best of thrash metal. The Black Album was a change in direction that was more of an evolution in the band’s sound than an ninety-degree turn. I have listened to these albums countless of times, and I spent hundreds of dollars as a kid on Metallica shirts, singles, imports, and bootlegs. Metallica, more than any other band, pushed me away from my parents music as a kid into the music that I love now as an adult.
Unfortunately, no sooner do I start following Metallica than they take a turn for the worse. Metallica became “Alternica” with the “Load” album, and, despite initial rumors that “Reload” was going to be the metal companion to the alternative “Load” album, there wasn’t much there that was any better. After a long hiatus, I had my hopes lifted when I heard early demos of the “St. Anger” album. Sadly, those hopes were dashed when the band decided that James didn’t need to try anymore, Kirk didn’t need to write any solos, the band didn’t actually need a bassist, and Lars could just bang on some garbage cans. After years of following an obviously fading band, I was done.
I mention all of this so you know what mindset I had coming into the review for this album.
Despite all of the hype for “Death Magnetic,” I wasn’t really excited to listen to and review the album. I had been burned by Metallica one too many times to get my hopes up. I also knew I had to give the album a fair shot, even though I wasn’t expecting much. Although my expectations weren’t high, I also wasn’t sure if Metallica would be able to exceed them. Hell, I wasn’t planning on Metallica being able to meet any positive expectations. So, what’s the verdict on the album?
The opening track on the album is “That Was Just Your Life.” The song starts out with a heartbeat intro with a dark acoustic guitar and a deep bass. Somewhat reminiscent of how the band started off so many great albums, but still somewhat different. The intro goes into a blistering opening riff with fast guitars and pounding drums, including some double bass fills. The real surprise of this song, though, was the vocals. After the past few albums (and hearing the band live in different settings) I was very cautious about what to expect. While James isn’t doing anything amazing, he’s doesn’t bring anything down. The song features verse, pre-chorus, chorus, bridge, tempo changes, fast vocals, and solid guitar solos. The bridge features some great guitar harmony, and Kirk’s solo is on par with anything that any metal guitarist is doing today. The most surprising thing about the song, though, is that it doesn’t feel like a 7 minute song. That’s a huge achievement for a band that struggled with being repetitive on much shorter songs on the “Load” and “Reload” albums.
So the opening track vastly exceeded my expectations. The real question, though, was can this band maintain this sound throughout the whole album? “The End of the Line” isn’t as heavy as the opening track, but it’s very solid. Again, the vocals are pretty solid. The guitar is layered and heavy. The song features multiple, varied guitar solos, starting with distorted, short double guitar solo, then going into a solo more focused on using a wah-wah peddle. This then leads into an acoustic bridge before heading back into a heavy closing chorus. Another song that doesn’t feel repetitive despite it’s nearly 8-minute length.
“Broken, Beat, and Scarred” is the second-shortest track on the album, at only six and a half minutes. It actually feels a little too short, though. The song opens with another fast riff with solid mid-temp drums. While it doesn’t necessarily remind me of any previous Metallica work, it sounds a lot more like Metallica than anything off of their previous three albums. The song has another tempo change midway through for the bridge and the solo, a blistering solo that could easily fit on “Ride The Lightening” if it wasn’t for the awesome tempo change and wha-wha effects mid-solo. The band, in typical Metallica fashion, brings the song back to the chorus before a heavy close.
“The Day That Never Comes” is the lead single off of the album, a nearly 8-minute epic that has already been compared with the legendary “One.” The main acoustic guitar riff actually reminds me much more of “Fade to Black” than “One,” but it’s still solid. Just not as dark as the “One” riff. James’ vocals, while not great, are still acceptable during the quieter portions of the song and pretty decent during the heavy chorus. At the halfway mark in the song, it starts to live up to the “One” comparisons as it gets progressively heavier. The last three minutes include blistering guitar riffs and top-notch solos with solid backing drums. Kirk is hitting on all cylinders with his solos, mixing up styles and keeping things fresh throughout the song. This is an amazing song that just keeps building and building.
“All Nightmare Long” starts out with an acoustic intro before going into a dark, heavy, drum-based riff. Like so many songs on the album, it really isn’t easy to compare with anything the band has done before, but it’s distinctly Metallica. Part of the riff reminds me of “Damage Inc.” but the style isn’t quite the same. The vocals are deep and dark, and the verse is sung at a slower pace than much of the rest of the album. The solo on the bridge is one of the longest continuous solos on the album, and one of the fastest also. The second solo is just as fast, and has great double-bass drumming behind it. This nearly-eight minute long song doesn’t have the tempo changes that “The Day That Never Comes” has, but it’s amazing that the band can keep up this type of speed and intensity for the whole song.
“Cyanide” starts out with a heavy intro before heading into a breakdown with just bass. I would’ve liked them to stay with that bass-heavy theme, but unfortunately they didn’t. This is another mid-tempo tune with a good riff, and some of the best drum work on the album. The vocals bothered me at first, but they’re not bad, especially once you get to the chorus. The guitar work on the chorus is pretty good too, with plenty of cool fills over a basic beat. The song has a great change of pace on the bridge, getting faster before going into an acoustic bridge, and then back to the fast, odd-time signature stuff. The odd time signature stuff and the time signature changes sound great with another awesome solo over them also.
“The Unforgiven III” is another chapter in the “Unforgiven” song saga. I don’t know if it was originally meant to be a multi-part song, but I’ve never really understood the reasoning behind that. This is probably the weakest track on the album, although it’s a few steps above “Unforgiven II.” It’s not that heavy, but it doesn’t have the same epic feel that “The Day That Never Comes” has. James does more singing on this song than anywhere else on the album, and it’s a pretty hit or miss. However, just like the rest of the album, the guitar work and the solos in particular are great.
“The Judas Kiss” is the second longest track on the album, and has (shockingly) a solid verse, a fast-paced chorus, and plenty of tempo changes to keep things interesting. And, of course, the solos are long and blistering. The song takes a dark turn about six minutes in, which again helps disguise the length of the song. It’s really amazing how well this band is able to take pieces that are different tempos and different styles and put them together as a song. The last three minutes of this song is a great example of how well Metallica is able to do that.
In the old days, the second to last track on a Metallica album was always the instrumental. Guess what? “Suicide & Redemption” is a nearly 10 minute instrumental that has about 4 or 5 different parts built into it. The band goes from fast and heavy to quiet and acoustic, with various solos taking the place of vocals on the song. The song definitely doesn’t resemble any of the band’s instrumentals from their first four albums, but it fits well with the album.
The final song on the album, “My Apocalypse” is both the shortest and heaviest song on the album. This song is all speed and aggression, with great drum work backing up a solid thrash riff. The solo would almost sound appropriate on a song on “Master of Puppets.” This song definitely closes the album on a high note.
After listening to “Death Magnetic” for three days straight, I can say one thing with certainty. Bob Rock needs to be severely beaten. I believed that before this album, but now I’m absolutely positive about it. It’s been over half my life since Metallica released a great album, and I place the blame for that squarely on Rock’s shoulders. This is the album that Metallica should have released years ago, and I’m glad that they finally got around to it.
That’s not to say that the album is perfect. The vocals are decent, and at times barely mediocre. The guitar solos almost all sound very modern, but, unfortunately, there’s no real throwback “80’s thrash” style solos. And, most importantly to me, the band just didn’t take advantage of Robert Trujillo’s range. Trujillo is an accomplished, versatile bassist, but no song on the album features that. With so many long songs and so many different parts on the album, I think they could’ve found a few times to feature some vintage Trujillo slap-style playing.
Overall, though, these are minor problems. Minor problems on a spectacular album. It may be a while until we can figure out exactly where “Death Magnetic” fits among Metallica’s catalogue, but it easily surpasses their past three releases. This is a top-notch metal album, and I’m extremely excited that Metallica has finally returned as a relevant metal band again.
The 411: Metallica took a shot at redemption and hit a home run. “Death Magnetic” is a front-to-back solid album, with decent vocals, great drums, amazing riffs, and some of the best guitar solos I’ve heard in a long time. This will easily be Metal Album of the Year. I don’t think there’s anything that will come close.
I was VERY surprised by this disc when i listened to it. Like you, Jeff...I went into it with very low expectations. And i came out absolutely amazed. To me, the disc feels like it belongs between Black Album and Load. Good review.
Posted By: Ill Nino (Registered) on September 11, 2008 at 09:23 PM
thats so great to hear, especially since i just bought tickets to their show. now im especially looking forward to the free copy that comes with every ticket
Posted By: Jcon (Guest) on September 11, 2008 at 09:25 PM
I love how, with older bands, everytime they release an album, their fans proclaim "They're back!" Then, fours year later, the next album comes out, and they admit the fans admit the last album sucked, but proclaim "This time....they're back!!!" It's an endless cycle.
Posted By: Marc (Guest) on September 11, 2008 at 09:28 PM
Well, you beat me, Jeff. And I'll give you props for doing a good job. However, for me the album is good, but borrows too much from past glories, so not great. With the exception of "Cyanide", nothing really kicked me like I had hoped. It's light years better than the last, but it's not better than Load, in my opinion. Then again, opinions are like assholes, we've all got one and most of the time, they're ugly and stink. I did hear overtones of Justice, Lightning and The Black Album in here (good). As for the other songs, nothing blew me away, but Unforgiven III does suck, as you concede. My fear is they will join all three live in concert and make a suite of them.
Good job, even if we don't completely agree on the score. 7.5 at best.
Posted By: Dan Halen (Registered) on September 11, 2008 at 09:41 PM
what? a nine? really?
Posted By: capt caveman (Guest) on September 11, 2008 at 09:54 PM
"Bob Rock needs to be severely beaten. I believed that before this album, but now I’m absolutely positive about it."
Yes! Finally someone agrees with me! I call Bob Rock "The Ruiner" because he always ruins bands with his fucking production.
Posted By: 333 (Guest) on September 11, 2008 at 09:55 PM
"This will easily be Metal Album of the Year. I don’t think there’s anything that will come close."
Watershed and Obzen are both better than this.
Hetfield can't sing for shit anymore.
Posted By: Guest#5631 (Guest) on September 11, 2008 at 10:25 PM
agree with your review jeff, definitely an awesome album and a somewhat return to their old ways...it sometimes sounds as if this was done between '...And Justice for All' and the black album...can't live up to master of puppets though, but its tough to match that perfection, lol -
Posted By: OneofaKind! Justin (Guest) on September 11, 2008 at 10:47 PM
Wow. Hyperbole like I've never seen.
This album is just as shitty as the last 4 or 5 albums. The only difference is that this one has a psuedo-return to actual metal.
if any other band in the world released this album, it would be completely ignored.
Metal album of the year? Not with Iced Earth and many other bands still yet to release this year's efforts.
This will be in the bottom ten, mark my words.
You are no metal fan.
Posted By: Guest#9167 (Guest) on September 11, 2008 at 11:33 PM
Thanks!!!
Posted By: guesthehe (Guest) on September 11, 2008 at 11:40 PM
Metal Album of the Year? I've only heard one track off this, and am in no hurry to get it. It was a decent tune. But I've always thought there were many other better thrash bands, who evolved more interestingly, too, than Metallica.
That said, are you sure your aren't confusing a Metal Album of the Year with the fact that expectations were so low, if Metallica put anything out that its fans think is HALF-decent, they'll be drooling. I can probably think of a half dozen awesome metal releases that are great, where expectations weren't so low.
Posted By: Jesse Coy (Registered) on September 12, 2008 at 12:27 AM
Finally, a true "return to form". In all ways, unfortunately. Jaymz and the boys always fuck over their bass players since Cliff, and this album is no different. A great album, but this is the most bass-averse band in creation. Still, nice to hear my musical gods still have it in them to truly thrash. I'm (apparently) one of the few who liked Load and Reload (I also have every original album and single the band ever released), and I've been a fan since 1988, but this is a great album and worthy of the original logo. St. Anger sucked greasy dirty assholes, but Death Magnetic more than makes up for it. Let's also not forget Rick Rubin, who reminded them they can still be the greatest band since Led Zeppeling. Kudos to Rick for a well-produced album.
Posted By: Jim C (Guest) on September 12, 2008 at 12:31 AM
Metallica stopped being Metal when they came out with heres your crown King nothing !
And trying to be Hip and Alternative with the times !!
To where they proceeded to go all rehashing old rock jams ! And they pretend to be hip and hard in 2002-04 with Saint Anger crap !!
Metallica hasn't been the same since the 80's and 90's ! They lost my respect when they tried to converge to what was hot in music at the time instead of being true to themselves ! They weren't changing with the times and growing and evolving
They were POSING and try to be this POP MARKET MACHINE ! and it turned into an EPIC FAIL !
Even hard core followers hate Metallica for what they have become !
Posted By: Guest#5993 (Guest) on September 12, 2008 at 12:38 AM
Wow, look at these reactions
Look at the haters go!!!!
Wow. Hyperbole like I've never seen.
This album is just as shitty as the last 4 or 5 albums. The only difference is that this one has a psuedo-return to actual metal.
if any other band in the world released this album, it would be completely ignored.
Metal album of the year? Not with Iced Earth and many other bands still yet to release this year's efforts.
This will be in the bottom ten, mark my words.
You are no metal fan.
Posted By: Guest#9167 (Guest) on September 11, 2008 at 11:33 PM
And:
Metal Album of the Year? I've only heard one track off this, and am in no hurry to get it. It was a decent tune. But I've always thought there were many other better thrash bands, who evolved more interestingly, too, than Metallica.
That said, are you sure your aren't confusing a Metal Album of the Year with the fact that expectations were so low, if Metallica put anything out that its fans think is HALF-decent, they'll be drooling. I can probably think of a half dozen awesome metal releases that are great, where expectations weren't so low.
Posted By: Jesse Coy (Registered) on September 12, 2008 at 12:27 AM
Yes, haters go back to Jonas Brothers and Hannah Montanah and your other Disney hit singles.
Jesus Christ.
Im a suprised at the audacity of the critics.
The album is the best theyve done since Black Album.
Someone said Load was good. Ha. Not metal, grunge.
A 9 is right.
This is one of the best metal albums, but not the best, Testament took that one.
Anways, this is metal and the solos are godly.
Lars is better and James is back to the growl.
Best Songs
1. All nightmare long (thrash epic)
2. my apocalypse
3. the day that never comes
Overall, i love it. Metallica's back.
To the haters:
Go back to your emo Chemical romance crap and Sex and the city movies, you dolts.
And just in case
Album of the years
1. Testament-Formation of Damnation
2. Opeth-Watershed
3. Metallica_Death Magnetic
Posted By: Marc (Guest) on September 12, 2008 at 12:44 AM
Because of this review I tracked down a copy of The Day That Never Comes, and let me say it's not a bad song. Unfortunately, it's not a great song either. It has the classic build and tempo shifts that were featured on Metallica's first albums, which is great to hear again after the pop songs since the Black Album. But Kirk's solos were pathetic. He wasn't even trying to do anything interesting, just moving his fingers back and forth on the fretboard. There was a time when his solos were the heart of the songs. Now they're just filler.
Posted By: Sly Reference (Guest) on September 12, 2008 at 12:55 AM
Today's music sets lower standards for all albums released. That being said, I didn't enjoy this album as much as other people seem to have. It's better than St Anger, but that's like saying it's better than eating sh1t
Posted By: Puff (Guest) on September 12, 2008 at 01:07 AM
I agree that this is much of an improvement from their most recent albums, and Kirk Hammett's soloing is champ in this album, but one thing I STRONGLY disagree with in this review.
The drumming is TERRIBLE in this album. There is no way it is even close to great man. It truly sounds like a drum machine did the work, a very badly programmed drum machine. Lars is just recycling his shit from Load and Reload. As I and many other people are glad Lars purchased a proper snare drum instead of the "ting" machine he used in St. Anger, the drumming in this album is what brings it down the most.
Time and evolution of drumming is passing Lars by, and he should walk away from the band. If they brought in a Joey Jordison or Andols Herrick like drummer, I truly believe you would see this band explode again.
So, good review for the most part, but to say the drumming is great, well... that's a big NO
Posted By: Tubby (Guest) on September 12, 2008 at 02:02 AM
I heard "My Apocolypse" the other night, and someone else summed up my feelings precisely - "who is this washed up cover band imitating old Metallica?" Seriously, that song has so many riffs and parts ripped off directly from Master of Puppets that Lars should sue himself for sampling. It's one thing to get back to the Metallica of old, it's something different to bastardize the past and claim you went back. Yet another Metallica album I won't be adding to my collection.
Posted By: Scott B (Guest) on September 12, 2008 at 02:12 AM
Read before you quote me, Marc. All I did was question whether this is Metal Album of the Year. You already listed two above it. Has it dawned on you that maybe there were another couple albums that also might be better that you haven't heard?
Before you label me a "Metallica hater," which I am not, read content and reply appropriately.
I am neither a Metallica hater, nor a Metalllica worshipper. They did some really good stuff, as did 5 or 6 other thrash bands who got less coverage. I don't think their 80's stuff was THE BEST, nor do I think their 90's stuff was AWFUL.
Think before you quote, Marc.
Posted By: Jesse Coy (Registered) on September 12, 2008 at 02:18 AM
Despite Death Magnetic being a good album, Guest#5631 hit the nail on the head saying that Opeth's Watershed is better than Death Magnetic. I'd also say that The Formation Of Damnation by Testament is a far better album than this.
Posted By: Guest (Guest) on September 12, 2008 at 04:32 AM
After St. Anger everyone has come to this album with very low expectations and because of those low expectations a very average metal record is being called 'album of the year'.
Metallica must've realised if they released another shit fest like St. Anger they could wave goodbye to being a musical force so they totally played it 100% safe with this album.
It's good, yes. Great? Not even close.
All those idiot 'Hardcore' fans who think there's nothing outside of Metallica & Pantera in the metal world will love it.
Posted By: psittack (Guest) on September 12, 2008 at 04:47 AM
I'd definitely agree that it's up there, but i'm not sure that it's the metal album of the year. Although Meshuggah is definitely an acquired taste, Obzen was solid as hell. Watershed was great, and Silhouettes by Textures was awesome too.
So yeah, great album, and an amazing comeback considering the last decade or so (minus S&M), but probably not metal album of the year.
Posted By: Fury (Guest) on September 12, 2008 at 04:48 AM
"In the old days, the second to last track on a Metallica album was always the instrumental."
Jeff, I think by "always" you actually mean "twice".
Posted By: Owain J. Brimfield (Registered) on September 12, 2008 at 05:30 AM
Is everyone forgeting Garage Days Inc.?? I know side 2 was all previously released material, and side 1 was just cover songs, but damn that is a great CD that everyone always forgets. 100 times betterthan the "Load/ReLoad" crap...surprised not more people mention that CD.
Posted By: Mike (Guest) on September 12, 2008 at 08:35 AM
Much much better than Load, Reload, St. Anger.
Although I've grown up with Black Album, I have long ago appreciated that their best years are during their first four albums. This is their effort to go back to their roots with a 'modern twist'.
First impressions are that the rythms are great, the drums skills are impressive but is there a problem on the drum set (???). The adlibs are greatly welcomed back but doesn't fared well to Kirk's previous legendary solos of old. The bass is good and gives a new way to the Metallica style.
My biggest complaint is the vocals. WTF is that?!? And some of the lyrics are out of 'Metallica' place.
Either way, its an above average album. Not considered as one of the best, but most certainly not among the worst. Rating: 8.5
Posted By: raistlinmajere (Guest) on September 12, 2008 at 09:07 AM
As I believe in free market, I would have some answer to all of these who say "There are many other great metal bands around doing excellent albums" but - if these other albums are so excellent, then why they don't sell tens of millions and don't get platinum discs? Where is the problem? In free market, it's like that - if something is good, people buy it. If not, then they don't buy.
And the reason why Metallica sells so extremely many discs is - they can make metal, which is audible also for people who are NOT heavy-metal hardcore fans. I believe there are lots of people who normally don't listen to Heavy Metal, but they sometimes listen to some Metallica.
Like you sometimes buy a good french whine even if you are not an alcoholic.
Posted By: The Economist (Guest) on September 12, 2008 at 10:04 AM
If by "metal" you mean ONLY hardcore, speed, and or thrash, then Metallica has a shot. But If you count Glam as metal, which I and millions of others do, then Metallica has NO shot whatsoever. There will be at LEAST a dozen better glam albums out this year.
Posted By: Darren (Guest) on September 12, 2008 at 10:07 AM
I really like the album. Judas Kiss is their best song in years. Not liking My Apocalypse though. A bit too St. Anger for my liking.
Posted By: Nandy (Guest) on September 12, 2008 at 11:37 AM
Oh yeah, gotta agree with Tubby's comment. The drumming is shockingly bad. Lars doesn't even seem to be trying anymore. It's a shame, cos the rest of the band are kicking ass on this album. He's dragging them down. Listen to My Apocalypse. It's as if Lars isn't even listening to what the rest of the band are playing.
Posted By: Nandy (Guest) on September 12, 2008 at 11:41 AM
I agree whith whoever said that if this was not Metallica no one would pay attention to it.
I am not one of those 15 year olds who don't remember what Metallica used to be...which is metal. If this is up for any awards it should be up for pop album of the year. However, this garbage should not be considered for anything. At no point in any of the songs is there any flow or feeling. This is the closest thing I have ever seen to musical writers block just hammered out at every stage of the album.
I'm sorry all you young people missed out on the metal era...please don't think this it. It just isn't....
Posted By: ERX (Guest) on September 12, 2008 at 01:54 PM
Dude, they're even less metal than Dethklok, and they're a goddamn cartoon band.
Posted By: Guest#7435 (Guest) on September 12, 2008 at 02:06 PM
Death Magnetic is a fuckin' riff masterpiece. Than you Rick Rubin for bringing the real Metallica back. Fuck you Bob Rock!
Posted By: Joey (Guest) on September 12, 2008 at 02:20 PM
Unless you like the radio and MTV, Metallica haven't been Metal since Justice. All of their following albums were pop/alternative rock. This new album is no diferent. Listen to Pantera, the true Kings of Metal. Stronger Than All.
Posted By: MBD (Guest) on September 12, 2008 at 02:51 PM
A 9!?
You need to lay off the crack dude.
Death Magnetic is pedestrian at best, and as many have already said, if it didn't have Metallica on the front, no one would give it a second listen.
But, ignoring the lack lustre songs and focusing on the production, just what the fuck happened?
Rick Rubin hang your head in shame, that is easliy the worst production I've heard in the last 10 years, and i'm including the demo tape my 12yr old nephew put together with his friends and a hand held tape recorder.
No doubt that "hater haters" will flame me to bits, but who cares, you can't flame away the truth
Posted By: Some random dude (Guest) on September 12, 2008 at 03:21 PM
This album should probably be given Metal Album of the last 5 years. It's the first album in years that's actually metal, and not a bunch of straight ahead thrash-crap with growling vocals reminiscent to someone vomiting. But to say Unforgiven 3 is better than Unforgiven 2 is a joke. 2 had some of the best vocal melodies the band's ever put down, and to be honest Load/Reload get too much shit. They're both very, very good albums. I give DM 8.5/10. Fuck the haters who've probably never even heard real metal before.
Posted By: kaktus316 (Guest) on September 12, 2008 at 04:02 PM
Meh, just another karate game.
Posted By: daniel (Guest) on September 12, 2008 at 04:10 PM
first off...metallica will never sound like they did during the glory years of the 80's..and for that matter, nobody will..the fact is this album is a hell of a lot better than anything since justice. i think the vocals are lacking, drums sound robotic but keep in mind these are guys in their mid 40's playing these songs...there will never be another band like metallica or another album like master of puppets so give credit where credit is do..if you hate metallica then get off the sites where you can chat about their reviews...i hate the fact that some of you idiots just hate on them because you are trying to be alternative and cool and 'not the norm'...give it up..if you like it buy it...if not then pop in some slayer (if any of you know who that is)...so in essence, until any of you faggots can play music like this in your 40's just shut the f**k up
Posted By: bmac (Guest) on September 12, 2008 at 06:27 PM
"I give DM 8.5/10. Fuck the haters who've probably never even heard real metal before. "
Worshipper... chill. There are MANY folks who are not haters, yet who still do not think the sun sets and rises around Metallica. Learn your thrash and heavy metal. Metallica is an important cog... but only one important cog of an important two dozen cogs. Take a look at those other cogs before you give a be all, end all response like you did.
Posted By: Jesse Coy (Registered) on September 12, 2008 at 06:52 PM
to define me as a worshipper is a far stretch...i'm simply stating that there are plenty of people who actually take time out of their day to get on these sites and bash metallica because they still feel like its the "cool" thing to do...to me...that is a hater..if they aren't haters then they like you claim to be, would just be indifferent..and if you are indifferent to metallica and believe they are just a cog in the metal wheel, then why waste time talking about it on a computer...for me, i'm just passing time at work...
Posted By: bmac (Guest) on September 12, 2008 at 07:15 PM
My question to all of those fans that have accused Metallica of selling out and being finished is this: What is wrong with experimenting with different sounds? What you kind of fans need to realize if Metallica tried to duplicate the successes of their past they would be destined to fail from the start. Face it, how many bands out there can you honestly say each album is as equally epic as the next.My point exactly. If bands keep doing the same shit they only produce shit in the future to the point that we would be saying this album sounds like their last one, just not as good. Death Magnetic is a find album. Fans have to face Metallica is not what they use to be. Jesus they are approaching fifty and live the good life now. You try to make angry ass music looking out at your pool while some 20 something is on your trunks.I say good work fellas. And I happened to like Load and Reload for the departures they were intended to be.
Posted By: Guest#5900 (Guest) on September 12, 2008 at 07:23 PM
i like it. Whats wrong with Unforgiven 3?? I think its a good song. I also liked st anger, load and reload. I dont judge an album on whether its metal or not, I just judge it on whether I like the way it sounds.
Posted By: Guest#0801 (Guest) on September 12, 2008 at 07:45 PM
Hell.Yes. Now this is what I've been waiting for!
Posted By: afanagain (Guest) on September 12, 2008 at 08:48 PM
I'll say this...this is by far the best Metallica album since ... Justice for All. HOWEVER, is it what I would call an "amazing Metal album?" Nah.
Metal has changed drastically since the 80s. New sounds, new elements, just a newer and edgier way of doing things in general. Metallica has missed the boat on maintaining some sort of contemporary edge in their music, and I honestly don't fault them entirely. They've always done, at least to me, what -they've-thought to be good music while at the same time still being experimental, management influence aside. Sure, they got a bit commercial with the black album. But they're change in style came at a time when grunge was getting ready to shake the music industry, and they needed a different kind of edge. Thankfully, that edge sustained them through the 90s.
Now we're back where we were in the 80s; long songs, amazing solos, fast hard-hitting rifts, etc. That's all well and good, BUT it has the sentiment of a band that's been left behind. It's just not the style of music that's at the forefront of the industry, anymore. And I honestly feels that kills their relevance some.
I'm not trying to bash Metallica in any way. Like I said, I think the album is great and hails back to a period where they were the kings of thrash metal. But it just sounds dated when compared to the bands that are major players in the scene today. Hence my statement: "Great Metallica album? Yes. Great Metal album? Meh, not too shabby."
And as a side-note... I don't really understand the hatred directed towards St. Anger. It's some of the hardest-hitting and grittiest shit I've heard from Metallica. Is it a style they should pursue. Nah, it just isn't what I expect from them. But I'd have to say that it may be one of their more personal albums and definitely has its place in their catalogue and is assuredly reflective of their lives at the time.
Posted By: Joe (Guest) on September 12, 2008 at 10:06 PM
album must suck so bad that everywhere I went today it was sold out....haters have no open mind when it comes to music
Posted By: OneofaKind! Justin (Guest) on September 12, 2008 at 10:17 PM
Hetfield can't sing for shit anymore.
as if he could ever sing in the first place.
This is a great album. Just skip Unforgiven III and you'll be fine
I can't wait to see this new stuff live!
if you are an old school "Tallica" fan, you will like this.
Posted By: Guest#2607 (Guest) on September 13, 2008 at 07:53 AM
"This album should probably be given Metal Album of the last 5 years. It's the first album in years that's actually metal, and not a bunch of straight ahead thrash-crap with growling vocals reminiscent to someone vomiting"
You don't listen to much heavy metal, do ya
Posted By: Guest#5127 (Guest) on September 13, 2008 at 10:23 AM
It's not a bad album, but I honestly think they can do better than this.
No, I won't give Rick Rubin full credit. To me, it like "a child and hot kettle lesson." After St Anger, they have learned. From us, the fans which keep on reminding them that they are slipping away.
Posted By: Guest#2594 (Guest) on September 13, 2008 at 12:15 PM
This album is flat out terrible.
I'm glad they at least attempted to make a return to their old sound, but they seem to have completely forgotten how to do it. Death Magnetic is an failure of epic proportions.
Posted By: Dave (Guest) on September 13, 2008 at 12:37 PM
Need to give it a listen, since im one of the most jaded Metallica fans out there, heck, i still say Mustaine beat them long, LONG AGO
but ill be honest, i listened to two tracks, and i actually bought the album, if for only the fact i said if they show me that there is some dash of old Metallica, i would buy it
St Anegr was the biggest load of crap EVER, i could only hear 4 songs, and i had to take it off, i have never done that with any other cd, and i like the Spaguetti Incident and Risk!!!
Im glad the boys are back, and yes, DEATH TO BOB ROCK!
Posted By: Megadeth (Guest) on September 13, 2008 at 04:07 PM
Isn't giving this CD a 9 kind of like giving the Best Actor oscar to Jim Carrey for his performance in "Ace Ventura: When Nature Calls" ?
This CD is not good. Its better than St. Anger, but then again so is the sound 40 toilets flushing in unison while Frank Stallone yodels "Eye of the Tiger" ....
The problem with this CD is, as a friend put it, "... sounds like aborted songs from And Justice for All, only the guys can barely play anymore"
Sometimes, its best to let go. Fans should let go of Metallica so they stop selling CD's and therefore James, Lars and their slaves let go of attempting to make more.
Posted By: GeorgeBeans (Guest) on September 13, 2008 at 04:18 PM
I think some folks would eat a turd if it came in a wrapper with "Metallica" written on it.
Posted By: Metal Fan (Guest) on September 13, 2008 at 04:49 PM
I go way back, picked up Ride The Lightning when it was new, saw em live twice for Master Of Puppets, once when they were opening for Ozzy before they broke big enough to be more than a opening band. Thing is, those days are GONE! Everyone wants to compare the new shit to the old, it aint happening. "Time marches on" (
Posted By: Guest#5281 (Guest) on September 14, 2008 at 03:41 AM
Great review brother. I love this album and I'm very happy this sounds nothing like "st. Anger". I'll be at their dec. 17 show, 3rd row and am crossing the days off the calendar. I can't wait. Metallica rocks.
Posted By: Omar (Guest) on September 14, 2008 at 06:24 PM
I am so sick of old-school fans unable to cope with the fact that Metallica's sound evolved from thrash to a metal/hard rock amalgam with a southern blues influence. Who cares?! At the end of the day, good music is good music and you can delude yourselves all you want, but it doesn't change the fact that there isn't a single track on this mediocre new album that's half as good as The Outlaw Torn, Fixxxer, Bleeding Me, Where the Wild Things Are or countless other tracks from the Load/Reload canon. Fact is, the band lost its way the second it started allowing whiny fans to dictate what kind of music they should be producing, which is exactly what led to the St. Anger debacle in the first place.
Posted By: sgt. pickle (Guest) on September 15, 2008 at 03:00 AM
I'd say, timeline-wise, this should've been the album to bridge Justice with Black. It's as if this album took everything that Metallica has ever done - the classic rock covers (my girlfriend pointed out to me that the guitar work at the beginning of "The Day That Never Comes" sounds very Blue Oyster Cult-ish), the 90's pseudo-alternative, the early 80's thrash, the late 80's thrash/prog, the early 90's groove, and the awful bullshit of St. Anger - and just mixed it all up in one big pot with production mastermind Rick Rubin telling them when to add what ingredients and when to let it just simmer rather than boil. HAIL RUBIN!
I'd say this is how I'd rate Metallica's LPs, from best to worst, including Death Magnetic:
Master of Puppets
Ride the Lightning
Kill 'Em All
...And Justice For All
Death Magnetic
Live Shit: Binge & Purge
Garage, Inc.
S&M
Load
Metallica
ReLoad
St. Anger
Yeah, I'd really rate the Black Album that low. After the first 4, the s/t is just such a huge letdown, with the album's best songs never really getting the credit they deserve (and they are "Holier Than Thou," "My Friend of Misery," and "The Struggle Within," IMO). Load has "Bleeding Me," "King Nothing," "Until It Sleeps," and "The Outlaw Torn," with the two epics being better than half of what was on Justice even.
Posted By: AndrewCrow (Guest) on September 15, 2008 at 11:51 AM
When i first heard the day that never comes on the radio i liked it and it seemed everyone else was so quick to say garbage but now that ive heard it more it really grew on me so i said F@#$ it and went out and bought the album. when i first bought it driving back from the store i listened to it and i thought it sounded good, then that night while out drinking i put it on and listened again and that sh@# was rockin it made me want to drive over lawns and flip my car
Posted By: marcus (Guest) on September 15, 2008 at 02:08 PM
Everyone should quit complaining and be happy you got a Metallica album that is better than anything since Black. At least they finally realized they had been playing crap and they needed to go back to something that takes talent. For me this album was much needed, and while some riffs and drums parts are just so-so, other parts are really cool and seem very well though out like the Metallica I'm used to (Kill em all - Justice). One thing I would have done different - on "The day that never comes", the intro is great and the progressions are catchy, but where is the intro solo like the old days? If there was a melodic solo right when the drums come in before the vocals, say, two measures long, this song would be so much better, similar to old Metallica ballads. Just my opinion.
Posted By: Joel (Guest) on September 15, 2008 at 03:26 PM
Good album, it really grows on you. Decent production, dynamic riff's and tempo changes, drums could have been a bit better but i was plesently suprised after st anger i thought they were gone. There isn't really a song i hate and im a hard marker for metallica being a fan from back in the eighties.I love the guitar harmonies in the middle of a few of these songs brings me back to the old days, Classic Metallica sound. Now to the haters, you havn't even given it a chance, you had all made up your mind before it came out that you weren't going to like it and now like a lot of try hard sheep you think it's become cool to jump on the bandwagon and bag metallica no matter what they do. You obviousely weren't even fans to start with.These guys are nearly 50 and are probably responsible for metal being able to evolve to the standard that it is today. Have some respect 8.5/10
Posted By: dime5150 (Guest) on September 16, 2008 at 05:36 AM
For me this album makes it cool to say I like Metallica again. People who don't like it will surely be WAY outnumbered. At one time it was the "in" thing for some people to say Metallica sucks, but not anymore. Just as before when Metallica changed a bit people hopped on the I'm cooler wagon and pretended they were above listening to Metallical. EAT YOUR WORDS SCUM!! You were never too cool, and you never will be. Get over it!
Posted By: IT'S OVER!! (Guest) on September 16, 2008 at 12:19 PM
This album could be seen as either great, or just passable depending on who you are.
If you are a metal head who gets your fix from plenty of other metal acts besides metallica, then this album could just be considered decent compared to the more evolved material of today's metal bands.
If you listen to less metal and a more, dare I say broad spectrum of rock music, both classic and modern, then this album could be seen as great. To somebody who is not used to hearing all types of metal (myself included) this sounds outstanding. It is loud, it is fast, it is hard, and actually fun to listen to. Metallica ranks in my top 5 favorite bands of all time, but is one of about 3 metal bands I actually listen to.
bottom line: Hardcore metalheads will probably dismiss or even bash this album. But disregarding more evolved modern metal acts and comparing this to the biggest rock acts of today, this album succeeds with flying colors.
Posted By: Guest (Guest) on September 16, 2008 at 01:22 PM
There's a lot of emo-slurpers on these message boards that have nothing better to do than bash a totally different genre of music. Also a lot of so called "true metal" fans that can't get over the fact that this isn't 1986 anymore. GET OVER IT. This CD belongs firmly behind AJFA and Judas Kiss is one of the best Metallica songs ever created. Bottom line, go start a band, record a CD, then come tell us about what's wrong with Metallica. Until then, save it. You're coming across as whiny little bitches that are screaming to be heard. And for what?
Posted By: DETH (Guest) on September 16, 2008 at 02:28 PM
Hey I love Kill em, Master, Ride, and Justice. I like everything they've put out besides st. anger, just all in different ways. I give them kudos for having the guts to try something new, like most other 80's thrash bands were afraid to do, so they regurgitate the same songs they have for 20 years. I was having a discussion with my friends the other day about this album and what had happened to metallica.
Here's what we decided, some where along the lines of after the black tour they came home to hot wives and golden toilet strewn mansions. They weren't the drunken teenage barbarians fighting for metal they were back in the day. They weren't trying to write scary shocking music. Another thing that a lot of people don't realize is that every band member went and got lessons on their crafts and thats where the change of pace came from. Thats why their non traditional change ups and riffing and unorthodox lyricism turned into traditional tempos, chord progressions and bluesy guitar solos. They were retaught how to do what they were already at the top of their game doing. And don't tell me that thats bullshit cause I've played guitar, bass and drums for 13 years now, and I don't play what I played like 6 years ago, because of techniques and styles I've developed and learned.
Anyways thats one of many theories I'm sure circling around. I think this album is a great change of pace for metallica, its mediocre I would give a 6/10 and I give Kirk Hammet a big middle finger for playing like shit and expecting us to eat it up. Sorry but guys like Mark Morton, Willie addler, Alexi Laiho and numerous other metal guitar players out there today can play circles around these guys. The drumming is horrible on this album, listen to Justice then listen to this album and it sounds like Lars caught autism or got hit in the head with a brick. These guys need to pick up the bottle again for gods sake, get angry. I bet if they lost all their money and belongings and lived in a shitty apartment in san francisco and started binge drinking, they'd write an album that would decimate this one, but one can only speculate.
They are true artists for taking a new turn with their albums that were different and douche bags for writing this album and pretending it is genuine. Every one thinks they are trying to go back to metal, they don't need to go back their the fuckin godfathers of metal, all this album proves is that they only care about money.
whew
Posted By: Metallica Fan (Guest) on September 20, 2008 at 04:18 AM