Kings of Leon - Only by the Night Review
Posted by James Palm on 09.23.2008
Slowly becoming one of America's biggest rock exports, the Tennessee-bred but more recently Northern-influenced Followill siblings return with their fourth LP in five years. How does the new material stack up against their previous modern classics? Regretfully, the answer is lackluster.
In 2003, an unofficial race began within the music industry. Unofficial in that to the best of my knowledge, the only person keeping track of this race is me. The prize is the title of ‘Best American Rock Band’. That year two particular American rock bands released their debut albums. Since then, both of these bands have had productivity unheard of in the last two decades, this year both releasing their fourth LP’s in five years. Even more intriguing is the fact that thus far each album has been fantastic; both outfits slipping in a masterpiece or two. One of these bands have already presented their latest effort in 2008; the Hold Steady with Stay Positive, an easy album of the year contender. Their proverbial opponents, Kings of Leon, have been slowing evolving over each recording, and now the Southern siblings are arguably one of the most popular rock acts on the circuit. How the crowds react to this inadequate album should prove interesting.
Only By The Night is the sound of the Kings waving goodbye to their roots and moving to Los Angeles. The character of their previous work has diminished significantly. Once, the band was like that awesome guy who knew how to party and always got the chicks. It began with their dirty Tennessee rock debut, then the bright lights of the big city started to influence the Followills, and they created the soundtrack to your life. Aha Shake Heartbreak was the Kings with more focus, more stories and more swagger. However, it now seems that all that sex is starting to affect them - if first single “Sex on Fire” wasn’t enough of a giveaway/admission – as that guy you used to admire now comes across as an annoying twat.
Said single is a pleasing stadium rock ballad, and is an album highlight, though mostly by way of default. Yet the problem is that at track number three, Only By The Night spills into dawn. After a powerful opening triumvirate, the album drops off considerably. Opener “Closer” throws a few new things our way, indicating the boys have invested in some effects pedals, while “Crawl” is the Kings only attempt at evolution; heavy bass distortion lending a Primal Scream influence. Matthew also takes one of his scattered opportunities to shine with a solo worthy of Pete Townsend. “Sex on Fire” itself is everything the single should be; catchy and phenomenal. However the album lacks the depth to maintain the momentum.
As ...the Night wears on, the band sound less and less like themselves, or like pale imitations of their past selves. “Use Somebody” is a formulaic addition to the recent Springsteen-is-God canon prevalent in indie-inclined rock bands. It also sets a precursor for the majority of the album, as Matthew’s guitars are overshadowed by Jared’s bass and various effects. The Kings signature sound came from unhinged interplay from all four band members; they weren’t all playing drastically different parts, but there was variety. Now, everything is quite mundane; there’s no excitement factor, and the band themselves sound uninspired. At least three songs begin by discussing dancing, and frontman Caleb sounds tired of his night-time adventures.
“Revelry” has him longing for a lost love in one of the few sympathetic lyrics on the album, however the majority of his confessions come across insufferably, especially since he later finds under-age love in “17”. His musings on the price of fame felt honest on Aha Shake...’s “Day Old Blues” - ” Low and behold things are killing me/Silly expectations of a dream/Girls are gonna love the way I toss my hair/Boys are gonna hate the way I seem”, and he proved he had a heart on “Fans” from Because of the Times” – “And her hair-do/He knows the lipstick kisses/Oh yeah that's the right move/Make me feel like I'm the one who moves you/The only one you see”. Some lyrical moments here border on embarrassing, “Manhattan” in particular is an apathetic track with simple intentions - ” I could dance all night/And some of the day/That's how I play/That's how I play/I say who are you/No matter who you are/So you dance all night /And you dance all day”.
Is it deliberate? Does the band simply inhabit the personas of lousier people in their songs as a negative portrayal of the people they’ve come across in their travels? Probably not. Truth be told, the band is still evolving, but they are losing the brashness that gave them character above lesser bands. Some songs amongst the glut of arena rock have stirring moments – the piano and guitars on “Notion” creating a harmony ironically similar to the Hold Steady and a tiny bit of the swagger returns on “Be Somebody” – but ultimately Only by the Night just simply cannot live up to its predecessors. In terms of my extravagant and imaginary race, the Kings just dropped off in pace, and the Hold Steady have built up a strong lead.
The Hit - Crawl The Encore - Sex on Fire
The Wah? - 17
The 411: The album is disappointing if you set your expectations high. If you’re a fan, there’s a chance you’ll grab it regardless. If the furious guitars and rough composition got you hooked on the Kings before, you’ll simply find yourself flat after finding their signature rock replaced with lacklustre stadium filler. The brothers and cousin Followill know that they play to the big crowds now, and the music certainly matches that feeling. If I didn’t make it obvious enough already, go buy Aha Shake Heartbreak instead.
I've had this album for a few weeks, and while it isn't their best, it certainly isn't their worst. With Sex on Fire, Revelry and Closer are amazing songs, and is some of the bands strongest work.
Posted By: Guest (Registered) (Guest) on September 23, 2008 at 12:16 AM
I dont think its as good their last album, but better then a 5. I would say a solid 7
Posted By: adam (Guest) on September 23, 2008 at 12:19 AM
Wow, with how hot they're doing in the UK, I never would have thought a five. Definitely don't think I'll be checking this one out now...
Posted By: Ben Czajkowski (Registered) on September 23, 2008 at 01:37 AM
I'd say this is a 9 at least. One of the best albums i've heard all year. Check it out at least, folks.
Posted By: Brett (Guest) on September 23, 2008 at 02:15 AM
Youth and Young Manhood is still by far their best effort.
Posted By: T.G. Corke (Registered) on September 23, 2008 at 05:02 AM
it's plodding for the most and horribly overproduced and really is not so hot. He's dead on. 5.
Posted By: jimmy guest (Guest) on September 23, 2008 at 06:27 AM
The Black Keys > Kings of Leon
Posted By: Villainaire (Guest) on September 23, 2008 at 08:45 AM
This score is dead wrong. Sometimes your expectations can effect what you hear. I think you've blown this review and because of that you might cause several people from listening to a good record.
Posted By: Frank (Guest) on September 23, 2008 at 10:28 AM
Wow, a Five? Really? I heard them on SNL this past weekend and became a mini fan. I'm listening to Sex On Fire, right now. It's very reminscent of the Red Hot Chili Peppers' "Snow ((Hey Oh!))"
I haven't heard the rest of the album, but Sex On Fire is really good to me, at least.
Posted By: M.P. (Guest) on September 23, 2008 at 10:38 AM
"Kings of Leon have slowly become one of America's biggest rock acts."
Uh huh... riiight. Where the Hell do people come up with this shit?
Posted By: The Jerk (Guest) on September 23, 2008 at 01:20 PM
I have to defend this album man, I can't seem to stop listening to it.
It's being called over-produced stadium rock, but I truly believe the production was extremely well done, and that the band is really coming into their own now.
I agree it's not as deep as Aha or BofT, but solid songs like Use Somebody and the finshing track Cold Desert deserve credit. Yes, they lost a lot of their southern rock elements, but I don't see that as a bad thing necessarily. Also, this may be the most solid deliverance on vocals in their career.
I(personally) would feel guilty giving it anything less than seven and a half. Hopefully it grows on you bro. Take care.
Posted By: Les Bakker (Guest) on September 23, 2008 at 02:00 PM
Love all their music. and to mention they are the best looking band EVER!
Posted By: ginger (Guest) on September 23, 2008 at 03:05 PM
How is 5 a bad score? 5 means average. It's middle of the road. I think this is the result of a trend in not just music critics, but the role of critics in general. Over the past decade of so, people flip out if an average album is given a 5 instead of a 7. 7 would imply above average. This album isn't. It's the very definition of average.
Their reach exceeds their grasp in their quest for mainstream American recognition. Instead of continuing to evolve as a band like they did on their first 3 albums, they wrote an album's worth of songs to get programmed on a modern rock station between Plain White T's and the Foo Fighters. It's bland and uninspired.
I began having worries when I first heard "The Bucket" because it was the type of arena rock that they seemed oblivious to on their first album but it was still at least catchy. And the rest of Aha packed gems like "Day Old Blues," "Soft," and "King of the Rodeo." "On Call" confirmed those fears when I realized now that they were basically abandoning good songwriting for cheap hooks that will snag them a spot on some insipid TV show like Grey's Anatomy. But again, at least the album that it was on didn't suck. This one...is pretty close. I don't begrudge them fame. I want them to get famous. Just not writing bland power ballads like "Notion" or filler like "I Want You."
Posted By: Rob S. (Guest) on September 23, 2008 at 06:20 PM
Copyright � 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.