Queen + Paul Rodgers – The Cosmos Rocks Review
Posted by Michael Melchor on 10.28.2008
Not quite the violent train wreck one would expect...but still a good derailing.
This should be interesting, to say the least.
Queen is a band that should need no introduction. Their place in history is secure and their status as legendary is a given. Be it as performers or musicians, they’ve raised the bar several times and dared others to top what they’ve accomplished.
If that sounds like a grand and pompous introduction, there are a couple reasons. First of all, we’re talking about my favorite band ever. A little bias goes a long way. Second, this isn’t quite a matter of, “they’re my favorites, therefore they get all this praise”; it’s more like, “Queen has accomplished all these feats and made such great music that I can’t but help to put them at the top of my list.” They’re not the greatest because they’re my favorites; they’re my favorite because they’re the greatest.
All that having been said, all of the above applies to the band’s output with one of the most legendary singers/performers in music, Freddie Mercury. His legacy and style – much like the top of this introduction above – were majestic and well over-the-top. When he passed in 1991, Queen honored him like no other passed frontman was honored before or after him and then kept a low profile releasing tracks that Freddie worked on in his last days as well as compilations that kept the legacy alive.
Then, about three years ago, they found another singer. (I can’t and won’t say “replacement” for obvious reasons.) They’d recorded a live album with Paul Rodgers, Return Of The Champions, which wasn’t the abomination that many were prepared for. With a reception that wasn’t akin to Anne Frank receiving Mein Kampf, Queen decided it was safe to do the unthinkable and release a full album with Paul Rogders – with, quite possibly, one of the dumbest titles ever conceived. They at least made the distinction of adding Rodgers’s name to their own instead of soldiering on as “Queen” proper, as this sounds almost like a different band.
The Cosmos Rocks starts, oddly enough, with “Cosmos Rockin’”. It’s your typical opening rock track – one that even Queen was known to do (“Tear It Up”, “Tie Your Mother Down”). However, Queen was at least subversive-to-cleaver about their selections. With Paul Rodgers in the mix, it almost feels like they had to dumb things down a bit for the guy known for singing “All Right Now”. “The Cosmos rocks with the power of rock and roll.” No, seriously, that’s one of the lines in the song. This is one of the reasons I don’t like bands like AC/DC and the Rolling Stones – they’re swagger and leering threats were rendered impotent long ago in lieu of automatic crowd-pleasers where the same sentiments, chords and everything else are recycled for the sake of guaranteed money.
That, unfortunately, happens a lot here. “Voodoo” is another prime example of having to write for Rodgers, as it almost sounds like a sequel to “Ready For Love” that he never got to record with Bad Company. “Some Things That Glitter” starts out with the lament of a butterfly and drops the last half of that line (about gold) that you’d expect to hear around a rhythm and melody that would be a great cure for insomnia. The penultimate track is called “Surf’s Up...School’s Out”. I’m sorry, but aren’t these guys in their 50s and 60s?
There are still flourishes of the old band present here. “Call Me” starts out with a groan-inducing opening line, but then shuffles into a bluesy—well, more like rockabilly snap-a-long that’s easy to get stuck in your head. “Still Burnin’” would almost qualify as another MOR groaner save for a few key changes and a beat recycle that’s at once insulting and clever that grabs the attention. Much the same can be said for ballads like “Through The Night”; in Queen’s hands, a ballad was touching and meaningful (thanks to Mercury’s vocal and keyboard prowess). With Rodgers, it all sounds like an excuse to hit & run, if yeh catch the drift – kinda like “Feel Like Makin’ Love” was in the first place. The one time Rodgers strays away from that – the humanitarian “Say It’s Not True” – sounds forced, but still a lot less sleazy than the other attempts here. (The vocal appearance of drummer and co-founder Roger Taylor help a lot with that.)
Therein lies some of the maddening issue here – both Queen and Rodgers have their own (very strong) music identities and neither know how to merge them well. One of the reasons guitarist and band co-founder Brian May decided to tour and record with Rodgers was that had his own style and wasn’t trying to replace Mercury at all. That should make some fans sigh in relief, but it still makes for some confusing (bordering on maddening) listening with this record.
One shining example of both parties merging well is, ironically, on a subject neither one has conquered in-depth. “C-lebrity”, a rant against the “look-at-me-I’m-famous!” culture that pervades our media nowadays, eschews the trademarks of both and instead, goes for a solid melodic punch that hits hard.
The 411: Queen + Paul Rodgers is aptly named, as both parties almost refuse to come together to record anything cohesive as opposed to songs that have the trademarks of one or the other. The result is an uneven pondering of why the band decided to go through with this in the first place. Granted, there are some great highlights here, both individually and together, but overall it’s a decent (if confusing) rock record that may serve Rodgers’s legacy, but certainly not that of his bandmates.
Posted By: Marc (Guest) on October 28, 2008 at 01:17 AM
Bohemian Crapsody?...
Anybody?...
No?...
Ok.
Posted By: Talon (Registered) on October 28, 2008 at 02:54 AM
Being as huge a fan of Queen as anyone and having followed them since the early 70s, I will say this - the album is not as bad as this review paints it to be. Yes, no one is going to replace Freddie. Yes, they should have called the band something else. That said, there are some decent tracks on here and some dogs (similar to a lot of latter era Queen albums from Jazz on). If you go in expecting it to sound like vintage Queen, then expect to be disappointed. If you go in with an open mind, you'll find some interesting songs even if some of them are a bit generic and not up to the legacy of Queen.
Oh, and Melchor - maybe do some research. Tear It Up was NOT an opening track on a Queen album, it was the second track on The Works album.
Maybe next time try and be a bit more objective rather than dismissive of something new.
Posted By: the_fiXer (Guest) on October 28, 2008 at 11:48 AM
"C-lebrity" is an okay song, disregarding the bad lyrics and cliched subject matter. Still, I'd prefer a "Freddie Mercury - Queen" album over this any day.
Posted By: Guest#9789 (Guest) on October 28, 2008 at 02:32 PM
HAHA...Good one, Talon
Posted By: Tim (Guest) on October 28, 2008 at 02:56 PM
There will never, EVER be another Freddie Mercury. The passion he put into every song he sang, as well as his ability to hold an audience, any audience, in the palm of his hand, is simply incredible. Just like there will only be one Elvis Presley, or one Beatles, there will only be Freddie Mercury. I'm not even touching this new Queen CD.
I'm going to go watch Queen: Live at Wembley Stadium. Under Pressure rules.
Posted By: Zingy (Guest) on October 28, 2008 at 04:18 PM
Good for you! Not all that has the Queen brand is sacred. I too am a huge fan of Queen, but have not bought into the Paul Rodgers stuff. Oddly enough, I feel Brian and Roger could've fared better on their own, as their solo material holds their own (it's still no Queen though). The only thing I really respect about this is the guys are doing it for their love of their craft (at least I hope), as these guys make a lot of bank from their past works.
Posted By: Tim (Guest) on October 29, 2008 at 12:46 AM
I grew up as a massive fan of Queen and have always loved them. However, I feel that May and Taylor have done their best to shit all over the band's legacy whenever possible. It feels like they will literally do anything that they are asked to do, as demonstrated by re-releasing We Will Rock You with fucking 5ive. 'We Will Rock You' the musical is awful, and Greatest Hits 3 was an absolute excuse for a record, and pissed me off no end. Made in Heaven was actually very good, but I really feel that they should have stopped there.
Posted By: Pete Thorn (Guest) on October 30, 2008 at 09:09 PM
I could not disagree with the reviewer more. I have seen Queen + Paul Rodgers live in person twice, and in their recent Cosmos Rocks movie (aired in the US on 11/6/08 in sensurround in theatres). They are fantastic. Absolutely blew me away. Queen and Bad Company were always two of my favorite bands. Did not know if I would like the merging of the two. Well, it damn well works and quite well. Different than with Freddy, but in some ways more interesting given the blues feeling underlying Rodgers singing. Freddie, for all his talent, is gone. Can't bring him back. May and Taylor soldier on, with one of the best other frontman in history, and one who still has extremely powerful pipes. I, for one, love the Q + PR mix and think that the new tracks C Lebrity and Cosmos Rockin are among the most powerful classic rock type tracks in twenty years.
Posted By: mcdermottlaw (Guest) on November 11, 2008 at 06:24 PM
Anyone who trashes this album simply knows nothing about music or music production. Forget the fact that Brian, Roger and Paul chose to "label" themselves as Queen + Paul Rogers (a proper business decision). And forget the idea that this is a QUEEN album with Paul Rodgers singing. It is a collaboration between three talented musical forces. I've been a Queen fan for 33 years. I own everything they've ever recorded as a band and as solo artists. I've seen Queen 3x with Freddie, once with PR and Brian May twice on solo tours. You have to rate the experience and product for what it was meant to be. I did not go to Brian's show thinking I was going to hear a paired down Queen show. Nor did I go to the Queen + PR show expecting a typical Queen show with a new lead singer. I listened to The Cosmos Rocks with an opened mind. I was exposed to the album as a Queen fan interested in everything these guys do. But if I listened to the album expecting to hear traditional Queen, I would have been disappointed. I absolutely LOVE this album. It is a well written, well produced album. There is not one clunker on this album and it ranks right up there as one of my favorite albums in the last 10 - 15 years. This collaboration produced an album that, in my opinion, is superior to anything Brian May or Roger Taylor have done on their own. And I haven't heard anything from Paul Rodgers since Bad Company that is as good as this. So I'll ask the following. What is the harm in three talented guys getting together, producing great music, and performing entertaining shows for those of us who appreciate it? The folks who have a problem with this are those who are listening under wrong expectations. They think Brian, Roger and Paul are trying to reinvent Queen. They aren't. They are putting out a new product called Queen + Paul Rodgers; utilizing their respective moniker's that they worked hard to build. Nothing wrong with that. I'm sure Freddie would have approved.
Posted By: Mark Ferrara (Guest) on November 23, 2008 at 06:57 PM
I bought the album on curiosity,I was pleasntly surprised.I am a queen fan,Freddie is the greatest singer of all time.However,the music is quite good,in fact,a cut above all music thats out there.Paul rodgers adds a blues type sound that is awesome.Giving time together these old guys could stand alone
Posted By: leaderofthepack2000@yahoo.com (Guest) on April 08, 2009 at 04:29 PM
Copyright (c) 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.