www.411mania.com
|  News |  Album Reviews |  Columns |  News Report |  Hall Of Fame |
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// Star Wars Episode I Brings In $1.1 Million in Midnight Showings
MUSIC
// First Official Pics of Beyonce and Jay-Z With Blue Ivy Posted
WRESTLING
// Impact Wrestling Rating
POLITICS
// Obama Showing Strongest Poll Numbers In Months
MMA
// Click Here To Join 411’s LIVE XFC 16: High Stakes Coverage
GAMES
// Star Trek Sequel Game in the Works


CD REVIEWS  CD REVIEWS
//  Hospitality - Hospitality Review
//  Sharon Van Etten - Tramp Review
//  Air - La Voyage Dans Le Lune Review
//  Imperial Teen - Feel The Sound Review
//  Seal - Soul 2 Review
//  Craig Finn - Clear Heart Full Eyes Review
 HOT ARTISTS
//  Kanye West
//  Lil Wayne
//  Rihanna
//  Britney Spears
//  Lady GaGa
SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds





Follow 411mania on Twitter!




Add 411 On Facebook
 



 
 411mania » Music » Album Reviews



Advertisement
Scale the Summit - Carving Desert Canyons Review
Posted by Michael Adler on 02.17.2009



Scale the summit are a young (average age of 22) outfit out of Houston, TX, consisting of: Jordan Eberhardt on bass, Chris Latchford on eight string guitar, Pat Skeffington on drums and Travis Levrier on seven string guitar. Their newest progressive instrumental effort, Carving Desert Canyons, hits stores February 17th.









Track List:
1. Bloom
2. Sargasso Sea
3. The Great Plains
4. Dunes
5. Age of the Tide
6. Glacial Planet
7. City in the Sky
8. Giants



Let's get right to the point: this album is a semi-epic fail. The boys list Dream Theater as one of their biggest influences, and it's apparent. Like Dream Theater, they're very talented musicians with minimal artistic insight. What's worse is, that with a Dream Theater album you at least have James Labrie's lyrics (insipid, yes, but they're there) to give the songs some focus.

These songs have almost zero focus as they all sound way too similar, and the concept itself goes off the rails halfway through the album, not that it was there too strongly in the first place. Let's continue this review with the not unreasonable assumption that while listening to these songs, we should be taken away to a desert; traveling over its plains and topography via the music.

Epic fail: nothing about this album evokes the desert. The guitars alternate between some lush (thanks to the range of some extra strings...see, they use seven and eight string guitars: PROGRESSIVE!!!....but, since when is a desert remotely lush? Furthermore, progressive straight forward rock licks do not remind me of a desert at all. I think Africa, maybe the American southwest when I think desert...yet any sort of attempt at integrating some world tribal beats are absent.

It kicks off with "Bloom" as a short intro that pretty much defines the guitar driven, Dream Theater inspired sound. There's some traces of modern pop punk in there ala Good Charlotte, which is NOT good. This first track melds into "Sargasso Sea" which is not even remotely close to a desert. It's a large area of non circulating water in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean-the only Sea not surrounded by land so to speak. Arguably because of a higher salt contact and lack of current action, it's referred to as a dead zone, but it's not devoid of life, so it really isn't remotely close to being a desert...especially since it's FULL OF WATER! There's a slight improvement here from "Bloom" in that there's some thrashing guitar work here to make you perk up a bit from the stupor that begins to set in from listening to "Bloom". The next track on our failed journey is "The Great Plains" which is a little bit softer, but doesn't really evoke the idea of being on plains so much as sitting in a coffee house. I might like it more if it were called "The Great Starbucks".

The high point of the album is undoubtedly "Dunes" as the band finally gets into the groove a little bit here. It still doesn't particularly take me away to the desert, but there's some undulating guitar melodies here that are reminiscent of dunes; the song actually has some identifiable movements, and by the end of the song, you say to yourself alright, now we're getting somewhere...maybe I misjudged these guys....

....And then you have the rest of the album. There's just nothing here to really make you take notice. Again, they're technically gifted, but the music is just there. Worse, we have a concept album here, and yet after "Dunes" despite such lofty titles as "Age of the Tide" and "City in the Sky" (Did we carve the desert canyons already? It seems like we're done with the desert already.) the music goes nowhere. There's no grand ending either. The last song, "Giants". sounding exactly like the the last three-indistinct solos and boring riffs-and it just ends suddenly in a little buzz of guitars. It's an uninspired ending to an uninspired album


The 411: We have an instrumental album here with talented musicians and no direction. This album amounts to a boring, uninspired peace of drivel with one bright moment on "Dunes" Perhaps there's hope for these guys as they develop. They are young, but for the time being, avoid this album, and pick up some Satriani if you want some blistering guitar work.
 
Final Score:  4.0   [ Poor ]  legend


Post Comment (4)  |  Email Michael Adler  |  View Michael Adler's 411 Profile

  Send To Friend  |    Stumble It!  |    Digg It!  | 



Please add your comment below.
If you are registered, you can login and post under your registered name. If not, you can post as a guest or register.

* Please note that 411 moderates all comments. Your comment will show up on the site after it has been approved by an editor.
 
Name : 
Comment : 
Remaining Characters : 
2800
 

Comments (4)

 
This is what happens when you let a instrumental hater write a review for an instrumental album. I don't remember seeing or reading anything about this album "suppose to be a concept album" either. And then on top of that you gave Gun's a 9. You obviously know what good music is when you hear it, haha. And you judge songs being good by what they are titled? Thats all you talked about. You couldn't comprehend the music so you just babbled about random stuff. In closing, you just suck and thank god this is only "one" persons opinion. A 4, haha, you're ridiculous. I give this review a 4, and everyone should avoid it and read a real review, one where the reviewer actually has experience with real music. I wish I could get my 3 minutes back of wasted time reading this, and writing this.

Posted By: Rick (Guest)  on February 17, 2009 at 04:18 AM

 
 
At first... I thought this review was a troll... In fact, I still think it is.

0/10


Posted By: Chris (Guest)  on February 17, 2009 at 04:41 PM

 
 
I agree with the first comment. You have no business writting a review about an instrumental band if the idea of that appauls you. And you keep making references to the desert. What does that have to do with anything?
What should they call song a,b,c. You got this one wrong, Mike. You were way to focused on the material thing, like art work, song title ect. You some how just didn't get it. I feel more sorry for you. Maybe you should give this another spin with some hydro and a clear mind.


Posted By: Pete (Guest)  on February 18, 2009 at 02:23 PM

 
 
Yeah, this is ridiculous. Its not even a fair review of the music. Just babbling about song titles and artwork. haha, you probably listened to it once and then just made up shit to make it a longer read. Not a pro writer, thats for sure.

and how the hell do "talented musicians" have "minimal artistic insight"? That doesn't make sense. Describing a band as "talented" relates to their technical skills on their instruments and their writing abilities.


Posted By: Scotty (Guest)  on February 19, 2009 at 04:20 AM

 


www.41mania.com
Copyright � 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.