Michael Jackson Was Humiliated During Police Strip Search
Posted by Ashish on 07.03.2009
And turned to plastic surgery as a way to not look like his father, says close friend...
Michael Jackson's friend John Randy Taraborrelli recently stated that Jackson never recovered from the original child molestation charges that surfaced against him in 1993, particularly from the invasive police search that authorities put him through.
According to Taraborrelli who had known Jackson for 40 years, Jackson was extremely self-conscious about his body due to all the scars he had from surgeries and was humiliated when police forced him to submit to a nude examination. Police wanted to see Jackson in the nude because the 13 year old who made the charges against Jackson told police that he knew Jackson was circumcised. That claim turned out to be false, as Jackson was not circumcised. Jackson ended up not being charged as the case was settled out of court.
Even though he was not charged, Taraborrelli said that Jackson never recovered emotionally from the ordeal.
Taraborrelli also said that one of the driving forces behind Jackson's many cosmetic surgeries was because he did not want to look like his father, Joe Jackson, who he has stated beat him regularly as a child. Jackson apparently thought that his face, particularly his nose, looked just like his father's.
Where were these people 16 years ago when he was last relevant?
Posted By: Guest#2829 (Guest) on July 02, 2009 at 11:28 PM
The criminal justice system doesn't work very well if there's no punishment for false accusations. Someone needs to find this kid and rape him up the ass. He should be over 18 now. Even if he wasn't, the kid obviously had enough ability to ruin a man's life, so he should be treated as a dangerous weapon.
No surprise that a cop would be a jackass to a minority. But that's not gonna change anytime soon either.
Posted By: Guest#7262 (Guest) on July 02, 2009 at 11:47 PM
"Someone needs to find this kid and rape him up the ass. He should be over 18 now. Even if he wasn't, the kid obviously had enough ability to ruin a man's life, so he should be treated as a dangerous weapon."
This is the dumbest comment I have ever read on this site.
Posted By: Reality Check (Guest) on July 03, 2009 at 12:45 AM
I've always wondered if Jackson was innocent of everything he was accused of after all. I never believed the 1993 allegations and of course he was acquitted in his 2005 trial. Maybe they were just trying to get money from him. I will admit that having children sleep next to you in bed is disturbing, though. The bottom line is that we'll never know the full truth. Jackson is dead and is no longer here to defend himself. I say let him rest in peace. But I'll bet that if he is guilty, he's answering for it now.
Posted By: Geoff (Guest) on July 03, 2009 at 01:23 AM
Jack-O never should've settled. To many people, settlement=guilty. If they had nothing on him, he had the money to fight the accusations, and show you can't make false claims against Jack-O just to get a pay off.
Posted By: Greendale (Guest) on July 03, 2009 at 01:56 AM
And, yet, MJ claimed he never had any plastic surgery except for his nose so that he could hit higher notes.
Posted By: NoirFan (Guest) on July 03, 2009 at 02:00 AM
"Someone needs to find this kid and rape him up the ass. He should be over 18 now. Even if he wasn't, the kid obviously had enough ability to ruin a man's life, so he should be treated as a dangerous weapon."
This is the dumbest comment I have ever read on this site.
Posted By: Reality Check (Guest) on July 03, 2009 at 12:45 AM
Why is it such a dumb comment? If a person's lies have potentially ruined someone's life, there should be consequences.
Posted By: cough (Guest) on July 03, 2009 at 02:16 AM
"This is the dumbest comment I have ever read on this site."
Have you been to the Wrestling zone?
Posted By: Litas Biggest Fan (Guest) on July 03, 2009 at 02:21 AM
"Police wanted to see Jackson in the nude because the 13 year old who made the charges against Jackson told police that he knew Jackson was circumcised. That claim turned out to be false, as Jackson was not circumcised. "
The claim was false, which means he was innocent in the first case. How come that false claim never came out before?!
Posted By: MissyNEVERWearssocksWithShoes (Guest) on July 03, 2009 at 02:24 AM
Jack-O never should've settled. To many people, settlement=guilty. If they had nothing on him, he had the money to fight the accusations, and show you can't make false claims against Jack-O just to get a pay off.
QUITE THE OPPOSITE. The parents taking the cash proves the kid was lying, or the parents were lying. If your kid was molested, you'd be happy getting payed off and letting it slide?
You would want the MF'er in jail!! Michael was innocent, all these facts prove it-the circumcision story is the icing on the cake.
Posted By: Guest#5247 (Guest) on July 03, 2009 at 09:12 AM
"This is the dumbest comment I have ever read on this site."
I was going to suggest the Politics section of 411 if you don't believe there are dumber comments made.
Posted By: Guest#3281 (Guest) on July 03, 2009 at 10:12 AM
yes he was so humiliated he paid millions to cover up his crime. with what the U S is coming to everyone needs to get a gun draw a line in the sand and see who wins. those with still a little moral fiber or the sick freaks that support child molestation, rape, murder, or any other crime beause someone is priveliged.
Posted By: Guest#7044 (Guest) on July 03, 2009 at 11:59 AM
Jacko surely didn't do himself no favors by admitting to sleeping in the bed with kids and saying he wanted to share the love. If that's the case, then every student fuckin' teacher out there ought to go free.
Posted By: fredtheimpaler (Guest) on July 03, 2009 at 12:26 PM
*sigh* And after seeing the video of him STILL outdancing 20-somethings preparing for his tour, this pisses me off even more that his ENTIRE fall from grace could have been avoided.
And everyone STFU, you were all fans.
Posted By: Ramsey (Guest) on July 03, 2009 at 12:34 PM
Let me clarify that I meant why didn't it come out that that claim was false before.
Posted By: MissyNEVERWearssocksWithShoes (Guest) on July 03, 2009 at 03:02 PM
Why blame the then 13-yr-old, when he was just doing as his dad told him? And why did MJ spend so much time with minors in his bedroom??
Posted By: Guest (Guest) on July 04, 2009 at 12:17 AM
