www.411mania.com
|  News |  Album Reviews |  Columns |  News Report |  Hall Of Fame |
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// Top 5 Positives From DC's New 52
MUSIC
// Rihanna Tweets New Bikini Pic
WRESTLING
// When It Comes Crashing Down - Why Hogan Shouldn't Wrestle One More Match
MMA
// 411's MMA Roundtable Preview - UFC 177: Dillashaw vs. Soto
GAMES
// Top 5 Football Games


CD REVIEWS  CD REVIEWS
//  Opeth - Pale Communion Review
//  Wiz Khalifa - Blacc Hollywood Review [2]
//  Wiz Khalifa - Blacc Hollywood Review
//  The Gaslight Anthem - Get Hurt Review
//  Godsmack - 1000hp Review
//  Shabazz Palaces - Lese Majesty Review
 HOT ARTISTS
//  Kanye West
//  Rihanna
//  Nicki Minaj
//  Lil Wayne
//  Lady GaGa
SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds





Follow 411mania on Twitter!




Add 411 On Facebook
 


 
 411mania » Music » News

Advertisement
Madonna and Music Producer Win Lawsuit Over 'Vogue'
Posted by Joseph Lee on 11.18.2013



According to The Hollywood Reporter, Madonna and producer Robert "Shep" Pettibone won a lawsuit that claimed they illegally sampled a song on her 1990 hit "Vogue". The original lawsuit was filed in July by VMG Salsoul, the copyright owner of 1976's composition "Love Break". VMG claimed that it was only through new technology that they found the "deliberately hidden" sampling.

A US District Court judge in California ruled that the sampling was "trivial".

The ruling reads: "Having listened to the sound recordings of Chicago Bus Stop, Love Break, and Vogue, the Court finds that no reasonable audience would find the sampled portions qualitatively or quantitatively significant in relation to the infringing work, nor would they recognize the appropriation. The Court finds that any sampling of the Horn Hit was de minimis or trivial."

The ruling could have addressed a standard set in a 2006 case of an N.W.A. rap song that sampled a Funkadelic song. In the Bridgeport Music vs Dimension Films case, the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals wouldn't approve of the sampling and looping of a two-second guitar chord. An appeals court wrote: "Get a license or do not sample. We do not see this as stifling creativity in any significant way."

US District Judge Beverly O'Connel ignored if a brief sample could be copyright infringement, and said it was appropriate to apply the case because there wasn't any proof of copying or sampling at all.

Attorney Richard Busch, who represented the defendants, said: "We are thrilled with the decision, and believe it is absolutely the right result."

You can find the ruling here.






MUST-READ 411 STORIES:

5 Positives From The New DC 52

The 20 Sexiest Women from Reality TV

The November Man Review


comments powered by Disqus











www.41mania.com
Copyright (c) 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.