www.411mania.com
|
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// The 30 Most Annoying Horror Characters, Part 1 (#30-21)
MUSIC
// Sabrina Sabrok Bares Her Enormous Boobs For Interviu
WRESTLING
// Top 8 Reasons WWE Should Stay PG
POLITICS
// Congress to Welfare Recipients: No More Strip Clubs, Casinos, or Liquor for You
MMA
// [PHOTOS] Arianny Celeste Is a Topless Tease
GAMES
// Top 5 EA Developed or Published Games


  MY 411
User name
Password
Register now! | Forgot your password?
 MUST READ
//  Occupy Wall Street Protesters Arrested
//  Apparently Assassinating U.S. Citizens Without a Trial is Totally Cool If a Nobel Prize Winner Does It
//  Is Rick Perry a Racist?
//  Reminder – There is Still No Good Reason to Support the Death Penalty
//  Obama’s Jobs Plan Won’t Help the Long-Term Unemployed
//  Nanny State Now Wants to Regulate Nannies (and All Domestic Workers)
//  Obama's Jobs Speech
//  The Choice: Perry vs. Obama
SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds





Follow 411mania on Twitter!




Add 411 On Facebook
 



 
 411mania » Politics » Blog Entry
Your Kids Are Alright – A Look at the Exaggerated Threats of Stranger Danger and Internet Predators
Posted by Enrique on 04.22.2009





I'm not blessed with children myself, but several of my friends are, and I can't help but notice that parenthood changes people. No, I don't mean it turns a once happy married couple into two miserable piles of sexless, passive aggressive goo (although it does). I mean it gives people an exaggerated sense of their offspring's risk of sexual predation. It seems as if once you have children, you suddenly come to the realization that the world is filled with dangerous pedophiles who might kidnap your precious little snowflake out of the backyard at any moment for a vigorous round of inappropriate touching.

This mentality was on display in a brief item that appeared on the indispensable Fark.com last week. Police in East Ridge, Tennessee were called in to investigate a "suspect who approached a boy walking to school and tried to coerce" the boy into being his special friend. Once police tracked down the suspect, it turned out to be much ado about nothing. For our story this week, let's examine the actual threat of stranger danger and online predators, and ask the untoward question – What makes you think your child is so damn sexy?

The story so far…

According to the report from WRCB, an elementary school student told his principal that he had been approached by a stranger who had attempted to persuade the boy to "go with him," and followed him until he got to school. (The story doesn't say if the stranger drove a dilapidated ice cream truck.) The principal called the police, who located the stranger the very next day, and thus the children of East Ridge were safe once again. Except they weren't in any particular danger in the first place:

Police Investigators interviewed the child and the man. The child now says the man had not spoken to him and had not been any closer than 20 to 30 feet. The child did state however the man made him feel uncomfortable. Police now say no crime has been committed.

However East Ridge Police want to commend the child for his quick action in reporting this incident to authorities. Officials want to encourage children to always report suspicious activity to police.
The fine reporters of WRCB are too gracious to state the obvious – the child lied. Once the man was in custody, the boy changed his story and said the stranger never talked to him. This man apparently did nothing wrong, and yet he was hassled by police because he made a child feel uncomfortable. Meanwhile, the boy was congratulated by police for his "quick action" in lying to his principal and making some poor fool withstand police scrutiny on suspicion of being within 20 feet of an overly sensitive child. What a world. Would it be impolite to suggest this boy is a sissy?

In my non-parental experience, I've noticed children aren't necessarily the best judges of character. It seems misguided to tell them it's appropriate involve the police every time they feel uncomfortable. It's one thing to give your children common sense advice about dealing with strangers; it's another thing to instill them with the irrational fear that predators lurk around every corner. That's not to say children are never abducted by strangers – one example is the tragic case of Jessica Lunsford, a nine-year-old Florida girl who was kidnapped and murdered in 2005 by a repeat sex offender. But such grim occurrences are exceedingly rare. Writing in the Gainesville Sun earlier this week, reporter Tom McNiff reminds us that stranger danger is a wildly exaggerated phenomenon:

First, violent crimes against children have declined steadily over the past generation. The U.S. Department of Justice reports that 81 out of every 1,000 children between the ages of 12 and 15 were victims of violent crime in 1973, compared with 44 out of 1,000 in 2005.

And, second, the worst of those crimes - kidnappings, rapes and murders - are being committed not by strangers hunting innocents but by family members, neighbors or trusted adults the family knows.
McNiff also reports that stranger abductions only account for about 0.03% of all kidnappings. If a child is going to be abducted, it's overwhelmingly likely it will be taken by one of its own parents in a custody dispute, not a stranger. Stranger danger is so low risk it's almost not worth talking about at all.

Another source of unsubstantiated worry for parents is the supposed threat of online deviants luring their children into inadvisable sexual encounters. It's natural for parents to be concerned about online predators, but like stranger danger, the menace is greatly exaggerated. In December, the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard University issued a report following a nearly year-long study of the risks facing minors on the internet. The full report, which focused mainly on social networking sites, is available here. Despite worries that the internet poses increased risks of exploitation for minors, the study showed your children aren't in more jeopardy than usual:

The Literature Review shows that the risks minors face online are complex and multifaceted and are in most cases not significantly different than those they face offline, and that as they get older, minors themselves contribute to some of the problems. […]

Much of the research based on law-enforcement cases involving Internet-related child exploitation predated the rise of social networks. This research found that cases typically involved post-pubescent youth who were aware that they were meeting an adult male for the purpose of engaging in sexual activity. The Task Force notes that more research specifically needs to be done concerning the activities of sex offenders in social network sites and other online environments, and encourages law enforcement to work with researchers to make more data available for this purpose. Youth report sexual solicitation of minors by minors more frequently, but these incidents, too, are understudied, underreported to law enforcement, and not part of most conversations about online safety.
As much as it may pain parents to admit it, minors often willingly seek out sexual encounters online, most often with others their own age. As for online harassment, most of it is of the teen-on-teen variety. Although more research needs to be done, there's currently no evidence your children are more at risk of exploitation online than they are in your backyard.

Having children remains a popular lifestyle choice in America, and it isn't completely risk-free. However, it seems like a waste of energy to fret over horrible but highly unlikely tragedies that will almost certainly not befall your family. Why not just let your kids enjoy their childhood instead? I hear they grow up fast, so make the most of it, be happy, and stop worrying already. They'll be fine.


Post Comment (22)  |  Email Enrique  |  View Enrique's 411 Profile

  Send To Friend  |    Stumble It!  |    Digg It!  | 



Please add your comment below.
If you are registered, you can login and post under your registered name. If not, you can post as a guest or register.

* Please note that 411 moderates all comments. Your comment will show up on the site after it has been approved by an editor.
 
Name : 
Comment : 
Remaining Characters : 
2800
 

Comments (22)

 
Well put.

The problem is paedophiles and child pornography are spoken about openly now (It's not a "bad" thing, so perhaps "problem" is an odd word to use here?) whereas in the past it was either hushed up, or not spoken about in mixed company, as the archaic expression goes...And from my experience, most people I know under 18 are WAY more net-savvy and less likely to fall for something shady on the net than many adults. My 17 year old sister can't believe that some people have open profiles on Facebook, for example.


Posted By: guym (Guest)  on April 22, 2009 at 10:28 PM

 
 
I was a 13 year old kid at a Godfathers pizza playing video games with my family not 20 feet away from me when a sick fuck and his 2 friends tried to drag me into a car and take me against my will.They tried offering my drugs before grabing me

I was able to struggle and get away.I told my parents and the chase ensued.My father,a lt.commander in the navy called on a couple of ft.Lewis guys to help chase down the assholes.

They caught them a couple of blocks away, car hotwired,cops came........took statements....nothing to see here they said.


I still feel sick to my stomach 23 years later thinking about it.I guess I am lucky.To play down the sick fucks who try to abduct people is wrong.......I hope it never happends to you or a loved one.It will change your life, forever.


Posted By: John (Guest)  on April 22, 2009 at 11:09 PM

 
 
Well said once again, Enrico. My mother was very paranoid about that, almost to the point where I had to stay inside all the time, whereas my father constantly encouraged me to go out and experience the world. It balances out, and I wish more parents could see through the deception.

Posted By: Guest#4363 (Guest)  on April 22, 2009 at 11:41 PM

 
 
stranger abductions account for a mere 3 out of every 10,000 kidnappings?

what's your source? www.typo.org? lol


Posted By: 6d6 (Guest)  on April 22, 2009 at 11:44 PM

 
 
Penn & Teller did an episode of Bullshit about this last season. Really interesting stuff. There are instances in which it does happen, but they are overwhelmingly less likely than media makes them out to be. In fact, statistically speaking your child is more likely to be abused in a Catholic church than on the street corner. Crazy.

Posted By: Jeremy (Guest)  on April 22, 2009 at 11:52 PM

 
 
There's nothing wrong with parents being protective, and there's always good reason for it. 1/4 girls are sexually molested before age 18, and 1/6 boys are sexually molested before age 18. Yes, only 10% of those are by strangers, but so what? See http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/ace/prevalence.htm for an adequate government statistics report.

"Oh, gee mang, your kid only has a 2.5% chance of being sexually molested if you don't watch her every movement while she's playing outside. Why worry about it?"

Riiiiiiiight. There's plenty of room for fun AND protective parenting, your article is blatantly irresponsible for suggesting otherwise.


Posted By: luna (Guest)  on April 23, 2009 at 12:12 AM

 
 
'I'm not blessed with children myself'

Then shut the fuck up and leave the parenting to parents.

Until you have children of your own that you personally have to protect, you just don't have a clue.

Think about it, the reason crimes have fallen against children is mostly because their PARENTS TAKE AN ACTIVE ROLE IN PROTECTING THEIR CHILDREN.

Not because self-absorbed fools like you tell them nothing is wrong.


Posted By: Mikel (Guest)  on April 23, 2009 at 12:16 AM

 
 
"I'm not blessed with children myself..."

End of your entire article. There is no point reading it because you have no ****ing idea about the subject, like that is anything new.


Posted By: Guest#6663 (Guest)  on April 23, 2009 at 12:47 AM

 
 
I don't really know anything, I just throw shit against the wall and hope it sticks. My name isn't even Enrique!

Posted By: Enrique (Guest)  on April 23, 2009 at 01:46 AM

 
 
"Until you have children of your own that you personally have to protect, you just don't have a clue.

Think about it, the reason crimes have fallen against children is mostly because their PARENTS TAKE AN ACTIVE ROLE IN PROTECTING THEIR CHILDREN."


I agree. Great points. It's a big responsibility & you can't fault a parent for being cautious. While they can be overly cautious, it's much better to be overly cautious than not cautious enough. IMO.


Posted By: My 2 Cents! (Guest)  on April 23, 2009 at 01:46 AM

 
 
So what steps do you parents take to be overly cautious and protective of your kids? Locking them in a basement? Watch for an actual increase in the number of "child-snatchers" a few years due to all these parent-Nazis creating a generation of emotionally backward sissies who want to get back at other parents of little brats

Posted By: Guest#9915 (Guest)  on April 23, 2009 at 02:53 AM

 
 
Would you mind telling me why you're here?

Posted By: Chris Hansen (Guest)  on April 23, 2009 at 03:17 AM

 
 
Gosh you idiots, stop getting bent out of shape. He's not saying it doesn't happen, he's just saying it doesnt happen as often as the media makes it out to be. All he was trying to say was don't be so fucking afraid with your kid. Yes teach them common sense and things to look out for, but don't make them so deathly afraid of something that isn't a huge problem.

Also, I've talked to many women in my lifetime and almost each of them were molested. By who? Family members. I've never met one who was molested by a stranger. So instead of teaching them be afraid of strangers, why don't you teach them to be more afraid of uncle bill?


Posted By: Vic (Guest)  on April 23, 2009 at 04:02 AM

 
 
It's always amusing when someone thinks breeding raises their IQ. Having a personal stake in an issue DISTORTS your ability to discuss it objectively, it doesn't give you insight the rest of us lack.

Enrique, if you're going to talk stats at least acknowledge that kids with attentive parents are far less likely to get snatched than the children of shmucks who turn their backs or let their toddlers run loose in the store parking lot. If only one in ten thousand people are murdered that still doesn't make it logical to walk through gang turf at night.


Posted By: Shockmaster (Guest)  on April 23, 2009 at 10:55 AM

 
 
I hate to say this, Enrique, but you have a HUGE credibility issue on this subject without having kids, particularly if you start with "I'm not blessed with children myself" and end with "stop worrying already. They'll be fine.".

Here is an example: you say yourself that children have a difficulty with being a judge of character. You then follow that up by saying that they should use "common sense advice" to make a call as to whether to alert an authority about a situation. If their ability to use common sense was so strong, you would not say that they were bad judges of character. It is much safer from a parental point of view to give a general catch-all piece of advice ("Always go to authorities if you think something is at all wrong") than to have them use their flawed sense of judgement.

I'm not sure how one can have such a big issue with the concept of "erring on the side of caution".

I'm just speaking for myself, but I'm very big on NOT having my son be that .03% that does get abducted.


Posted By: J. Alexander Mitchell (Guest)  on April 23, 2009 at 11:21 AM

 
 
One thing to keep in mind, is there is so much more media nowadays, and everything gets magnified. As a father of 2 daughters (9 and 7) I am extremely protective, and I do believe it's worse now. The days of just letting your kids hang out with other kids in the neighborhood before you call at them for dinner are over, and they aren't coming back.

Posted By: gwpbrian (Guest)  on April 23, 2009 at 11:24 AM

 
 
Geez, why do people always have to be all or nothing?! I'm pretty sure that what Enrique is saying here is that we don't need to be as protective as we are, not that we need to end protectiveness. It's your job as a parent to be protective, but not over-protective. I know plenty of parents that fall way into the second catagory. It's natural, emotionally to do so. But that doesn't make it right. It just makes you feel better. Just dial down the protectiveness from 9 to 6.5. You don't need to go to 1.

Posted By: xjuggernaughtx (Guest)  on April 23, 2009 at 04:55 PM

 
 
I have no idea how old you are, but being a parent is the biggest responsibility anyone could ever know. You are responsible for one or more life. You are responsible for keeping them safe and healthy. I agree that we can't make our children so paranoid and terrified that they won't even go outside, but they need to know the dangers. It's especially more difficult today - with the internet, the predators come into your home.

As a father of two, I don't need you to lecture me about the dangers of child abduction and abuse. I have to worry about it every day of my life. You don't.


Posted By: A Parent (Guest)  on April 23, 2009 at 05:39 PM

 
 
So any of you "awesome parents" have any response to teaching your child being more cautious of a family member? Your child has more of a chance being harmed by them.

I remember when I was young, my parents would teach me to only open the front door for them. I would ask "well howabout uncle so and so or aunt so and so?" and they would tell me "No, only us."

Do any of you guys have set family members who you know you could trust with your child? Or do you just leave them with any member of your family because "Hey! Atleast they aren't big bad strangers that are everywhere trying to get my child!"


Posted By: Vic (Guest)  on April 23, 2009 at 06:38 PM

 
 
interesting article. i keep coming back and reading the comments.

i don't have kids either. i sympathize with you for the way the parents have taken you to task for supposedly having an opinion without the life experience to back it up. i think that's wrong.

it takes a village to raise a child. even us strangers have a stake in keeping your child safe.

...by the way, i'm a village volunteer fireman...

bottom line is there's too much fear going on and clearly SOMEBODY (whether that's the parents or teachers or politicians or clergy or tv or all) needs to ease off on the little kids, because it's not fair to them.


Posted By: 6d6 (Guest)  on April 24, 2009 at 02:31 AM

 
 
While I agree that shows like To Catch A Predator and similar specials make it seem like a bigger epidemic than it really is, it's still a credible fear for most parents due to the parental instincts that kick in once the baby comes. It's just the whole age-old "you don't have kids, you don't understand" arguement. I've got a daughter, so I'm immediately over protective, but that just comes with the territory.

The fact that pedophilia is no longer taboo to talk about is the real problem here...it should NEVER be OK in ANY situation to have sex with a child.


Posted By: Ramsey (Guest)  on April 27, 2009 at 02:43 PM

 
 
A child was abducted this morning by a stranger here in Albuquerque, and was only saved by an alert neighbor. I rest my case. As I suspected this article was written by somebody with no kids, so you clearly have no clue. What's even worse are posters like guym who says pedophilia isn't a "bad" thing (no doubt a pedophile himself).

Posted By: Andacar (Guest)  on August 17, 2011 at 10:12 AM

 
STAY CURRENT




Advertisement



www.41mania.com
Copyright � 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.