www.411mania.com
| Search
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// [Gossip] Kristin Cavallari's See-Through Lace Top
MUSIC
// [CONTEST] Win A Mötley Crüe Prize Pack & HD Radio From 411!
WRESTLING
// Top 10 Survivor Series Matches
POLITICS
// Is It Possible To Change Washington?
MMA
// 411's Strikeforce: Fedor vs. Rogers Roundtable Preview
BOXING
// 411 Prizefight Preview: Dawson vs. Johnson II
GAMES
// Top 10 Arcade Games




  MY 411
User name
Password
Register now! | Forgot your password?
 MUST READ
//  WWSD - What Would Schlafly Do?
//  Game Time: Obama Set to Deliver National Address on Health Care Sept. 9
//  The Revolution Will Be Twitterized
//  What's So Wrong With Don't Ask, Don't Tell?
//  Why Letterman's Apology is Bad for Democracy
//  Porn Actress Tests Positive for HIV – Could More Government Oversight Have Prevented It?
//  Who Was Worse, Palin or Letterman?
//  Is Sotomayor Good Enough for the Supreme Court?
SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds





Follow 411mania on Twitter!




Add 411 On Facebook
 



 
 411mania » Politics » Blog Entry
California Man Faces Prison for Legally Distributing Medical Marijuana
Posted by Enrique on 06.11.2009





As you may be aware, the citizens of the state of California voted in favor of legalizing medical marijuana in 1996. Despite the fact several states permit the use of medical marijuana, federal law regards pot as a serious controlled substance, and the Bush administration Department of Justice conducted several raids on medical marijuana dispensaries. President Barack Obama vowed to end this particular abuse of government power, and indeed there have been so such raids since February.

But what about the poor bastards who were pinched during the Bush administration's war on drugs? For our story this week, let's have a look at the atrocious case of Charlie Lynch. Mr. Lynch was the owner of a medical marijuana clinic in Morro Bay, California that was raided by some busybody public servants in 2007, presumably for his own good and to protect the children. Lynch was found guilty in federal court, and awaits sentencing on Thursday. His "crime" carries a mandatory minimum sentence of five years. Sounds like a presidential pardon is in order.

Update: Reason reports Lynch has been sentenced to one year and one day in jail. He is free pending appeal.

The story so far…

Lynch's travails have garnered some MSM attention, including this interview on Larry King Live.



At the time, Lynch's sentencing had been pushed back because U.S. District Court Judge George Wu clearly sympathized with the defendant. It was mostly a symbolic gesture, and at this point the top half of the hourglass is just about empty:

Judge Wu continued the sentencing until June 11, 2009 to give defense lawyers more time to provide legal briefings to get around the Mandatory Minimums. Judge Wu indicated that if he could get around the mandatory minimums he would but still cannot find legal standing. He also indicated early after the conviction that the mandatory minimums in this case don't seem fair. He also indicated that if he does not find legal grounds for bypassing the mandatory minimums 'his hands are tied'.
It's no surprise Wu doesn't want to railroad Lynch, because all available evidence indicates Lynch is a decent person who simply wanted to provide relief to the seriously ill. One former patient testified at Lynch's sentencing hearing about how Lynch provided him with marijuana at a discount or for free when he was battling bone cancer. The mayor of Morro Bay as well as the city attorney testified on Lynch's behalf. There is absolutely no sensible reason to believe Lynch poses any danger to society.

The only reason Lynch was convicted in the first place is because federal jurisprudence was severely stacked against him. As it happens, the Supreme Court has ruled medical necessity can't be used as a defense against charges of distributing marijuana, so Lynch's attorneys weren't even allowed to tell the trial jury medical marijuana is perfectly legal in California. To paraphrase Lynch's lawyers, federal prosecutors essentially spent a crapload of taxpayer money proving Charlie Lynch sold marijuana at his legal marijuana dispensary. Presumably, they're very proud of themselves.

And none of this would have happened if not for one busybody public servant in particular.


Sheriff Pat Hedges, officious asshole

Even at my advanced age, I'm still baffled at how certain public servants get the vapors over the harmless behavior of strangers, and have no qualms about using their power to enforce their personal preferences on others. Pat Hedges is a prime example of this kind of contemptible, undeserved sense of righteousness. Apparently, he repeatedly harassed Lynch in hopes of discovering illegal activity, to no avail:

The San Luis Obispo, California Sheriff Pat Hedges, tried and tried to catch Lynch doing something illegal, but he simply wasn't violating the law.

The lawless Sheriff had a personal grudge against marijuana and a determination to rid his county of something that voters approved, plain and simple.

After exhausting his local resources, SLO Sheriff Hedges brought in federal agents from the DEA and they finally got a security guard to sell some pot to them. The security guard wasn't even near the dispensary, miles away in fact, but that didn't stop the DEA from creating a connection to Charles Lynch.
In an interview with John Stossel earlier this year, Hedges said his objection was that Charlie Lynch made a profit, telling Stossel, "You're making an assumption that he's helping people. He was primarily helping himself." I think we can all agree opposing profits is fundamentally un-American. Lynch got caught up in one sheriff's unpatriotic moral crusade, and now he faces prison time for the crime of helping sick people in a manner fully consistent with his state's laws. As they say, no good deed goes unpunished.

Even with a sympathetic judge, the only hope Lynch had to avoid incarceration was for the DOJ to withdraw its sentencing recommendation. Alas, here's what the Obama DOJ told the U.S. Attorney who prosecuted Lynch, after the judge had given them an opportunity to do the right thing:

[A]t the request of the [U.S. Attorney's Office], in response to the Court's inquiries, the Office of the Deputy Attorney General has reviewed the facts of this case and determined that the investigation, prosecution, and conviction of defendant are entirely consistent with the policies of DOJ and with public statements made by the Attorney General with respect to marijuana prosecutions. Accordingly, the USAO has been instructed to proceed with the sentencing recommendations previously filed in this case.
And so the failed policies of the past eight years continue apace. Assuming Lynch is sentenced to prison, only a presidential pardon could set the record straight. Here's to hoping for change we can believe in.

Free Charlie Lynch.


Post Comment (14)  |  Email Enrique  |  View Enrique's 411 Profile

  Send To Friend  |    Stumble It!  |    Digg It!  | 



Please add your comment below.
If you are registered, you can login and post under your registered name. If not, you can post as a guest or register.

* Please note that 411 moderates all comments. Your comment will show up on the site after it has been approved by an editor.
 
Name : 
Comment : 
Remaining Characters : 
2800
 

Comments (14)

 
These kinds of things don't happen in Canada

Posted By: Sal Poa (Guest)  on June 11, 2009 at 12:16 AM

 
 
...and this is what happens when a Federal Law/Mandate is contradictory to a State Law/Mandate. That is the bigger problem here. Aside from the fact that I believe the War on Drugs is a complete farce. Evidence suggests this.

Posted By: Elliot (Guest)  on June 11, 2009 at 01:54 AM

 
 
Only reason why this is such a huge issue now is because marijuana would be a huge distraction from the failing Obama administration. Just think how much the savior Obama could accomplish with not only republicans out of the way, but the majority of the American population stoned.

Posted By: Rehab (Guest)  on June 11, 2009 at 06:58 AM

 
 
Not only has the supreme court ruled that you can't use compassionate use as a defense, BUT they have also ruled you can't even MENTION state medical marijuana law compliance in federal court.

However, if you watch the overall story of marijuana-- within 10 years we will have full decriminalization, if not legalization.


Posted By: M:-X (Guest)  on June 11, 2009 at 07:53 AM

 
 
I hope he gets the needle like the rest of the pot smoking communtiy deserves.

Posted By: LOS313 (Guest)  on June 11, 2009 at 07:57 AM

 
 
have the people of California ever heard of the Supremecy Clause in the US Constitution? It basically says that ALL state laws are subordinate to Federal laws. so if a Federal law says Pot is illegal, it doesn't matter what the state law says, pot is illegal in the US.

Posted By: dan (Guest)  on June 11, 2009 at 08:19 AM

 
 
The War on Drugs is like those Truth commercials that are actually produced by the same cigarette manufacturers they demonize.

I'm also troubled by those who choose 'Authority Figure' as their career field. Largely their decisions are based on remaining in authority. I'm sure it's easier and cheaper to bust a legitimate storefront drug dispensory than it is to mount an investigation to find a meth lab hidded in some backwater trailer park.

Perhaps those people who have now been inconvenienced by Sheriff Hedges can do some snooping around and put the good officer's transgressions on parade. Chances are he's not exactly a 'by the book' sort of public servant. It's the very definition of 'let he without sin cast the first stone.' It's the American Way.


Posted By: Trueindeed (Guest)  on June 11, 2009 at 09:20 AM

 
 
I hope he gets the needle like the rest of the pot smoking communtiy deserves.

Posted By: LOS313 (Guest) on June 11, 2009 at 07:57 AM

So you support legalizing heroin?!

Seriously though, what a tragic waste of tax dollars, jail space, and police resources that could be used to actually protect us. How anyone figures pot is more dangerous than alcohol is beyond me. And of course, "It's the law!" is not a rational policy argument. Federal DOES trump state law, but it's still wrong.


Posted By: Shockmaster (Guest)  on June 11, 2009 at 11:09 AM

 
 
Best article I've read from you in a while, E, and not only because I agree with you wholeheartedly.

I agree with Elliot and Dan, something needs to be done at the federal level at some point, but I don't think that it will be within the next decade (hopefully, though).

Free Charlie Lynch - and, while we're at it, let's free that douchebag Mark Emery, too!


Posted By: Scotty H (Guest)  on June 11, 2009 at 01:13 PM

 
 
Disappointing.
All I can say is the DOJ probably doesn't want to set a precedent of tossing out cases that have been properly adjudicated even if the outcome seems stupid. Respect for jurisprudence and all.
Not much consolation for the poor shlub stuck in the pokey.


Posted By: The Omen (Registered)  on June 11, 2009 at 04:45 PM

 
 
"Only reason why this is such a huge issue now is because marijuana would be a huge distraction from the failing Obama administration. Just think how much the savior Obama could accomplish with not only republicans out of the way, but the majority of the American population stoned."

Posted By: Rehab (Guest) on June 11, 2009 at 06:58 AM

Isn't it a little naive to think that the law is keeping people from smoking weed right now? I mean, if pot were legalized, how many more people would be smoking it than do right now? Something like ten percent? Fifteen maybe?

Come on, man, does EVERY topic of discussion have to degenerate into chants of "OBAMMIE THE COMMIE"?

Also, leave the sarcasm to someone with a sense of humor.


Posted By: KanyonKreist (Registered)  on June 11, 2009 at 05:56 PM

 
 
all weed will be legal everywher soon and those who dont smoke will be killed. ha ha. seriously though cops are cowards. legalize the magical leaf already retards and leave honest americans alone ! usa !

Posted By: better than you (Guest)  on June 11, 2009 at 07:05 PM

 
 
Supremecy Clause wins here.

Posted By: Blah (Guest)  on June 11, 2009 at 09:08 PM

 
 
The fed can't just make up any laws it wants. It has to be something specifically enumerated in the Constitution, everything else is the domain of the States.

So point me to the clause in the Constitution that says the fed can criminalize drug use? There's a reason why an Amendment had to be passed for Prohibition, it's because Congress does not actually have that power.

It's too bad the SCOTUS and law in general is mostly just procedural bullshit, and there really is no logic or consistency to it. If 5 out of 9 people decide something, the rest of the country is now subject to it. And we all know Congress is in Corporate America's backpocket, which includes Big Tobbaco, who do not want the competition. I'm sure the beer companies are quite adamant about it too. Marijuana is far safer than Nicotine and Alcohol, but those are legal and weed is not.

I saw this as someone that has never done any drugs in his life. I'm straight edge. I don't even drink. The only things I take are creatine and a multivitamin. But weed vs. nicotine and alcohol, to an unbiased objective review, is not a contest.


Posted By: Serp (Guest)  on June 11, 2009 at 10:09 PM

 
STAY CURRENT

Advertisement



www.41mania.com
Copyright © 2005 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.