www.411mania.com
|
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// Star Wars Episode I Brings In $1.1 Million in Midnight Showings
MUSIC
// First Official Pics of Beyonce and Jay-Z With Blue Ivy Posted
WRESTLING
// Impact Wrestling Rating
POLITICS
// Obama Showing Strongest Poll Numbers In Months
MMA
// Click Here To Join 411’s LIVE XFC 16: High Stakes Coverage
GAMES
// Star Trek Sequel Game in the Works


  MY 411
User name
Password
Register now! | Forgot your password?
 MUST READ
//  Occupy Wall Street Protesters Arrested
//  Apparently Assassinating U.S. Citizens Without a Trial is Totally Cool If a Nobel Prize Winner Does It
//  Is Rick Perry a Racist?
//  Reminder – There is Still No Good Reason to Support the Death Penalty
//  Obama’s Jobs Plan Won’t Help the Long-Term Unemployed
//  Nanny State Now Wants to Regulate Nannies (and All Domestic Workers)
//  Obama's Jobs Speech
//  The Choice: Perry vs. Obama
SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds





Follow 411mania on Twitter!




Add 411 On Facebook
 



 
 411mania » Politics » Blog Entry
Failing Upward: The Palin Reality Show
Posted by Robert Zimmer on 11.19.2009



'Going Rogue' could just as easily be the title of a TV reality show about a white-trash family who somehow found themselves running for president, because like shows such as 'Keeping Up with The Kardashians,' Palin's book merely offers a simulated version of reality – "truthiness," as Stephen Colbert would say. There is no need for E! (or Fox) to put Palin's show on the air, however, as it already runs on virtually every network. It is not that the Palins are inherently trashy; their private lives are refreshingly normal. The sleaze factor comes from Palin's shamelessness. She has leveraged her naked ambition, and ability to lie with enthusiasm, to whore herself and her family to the media in order to grasp the fleeting mantle of fame and money. The Palins have certainly endured beyond 15 minutes, and will likely endure beyond 15 months. But to what end?

Having discredited herself almost entirely during the 2008 presidential campaign with bizarre, incoherent television interviews displaying her utter lack of preparedness for the vice presidency, Palin cheerfully went on to quit her job as Alaska's governor, claiming she could better do her job by not doing it; she has engaged in a public Jon-and-Kate style spat with her daughter's 19-year-old ex-fiancé, who has now distinguished himself by posing nude in Playgirl magazine; and she endorsed a conservative tea-bagger candidate in the New York special congressional election who went on to lose to a Democrat, handing Republicans a loss in that district for the first time in over 100 years. The Associated Press fact-checked Palin's book and found that it is riddled with falsehoods, like most of Palin's public statements. Failure, clearly, has been no obstacle to Palin's success.

Just as Americans have a peculiar fetish for watching themselves be made fools of on television, America also has a penchant for allowing people to fail upward – just look at George W. Bush. This is true in part because if Americans personally like someone or his/her style, we sometimes overlook their professional incompetence. In some other cases, merely being an insubordinate rogue earns respect or a promotion, as known to anyone who's seen or lived the movie 'Office Space.' And sometimes we simply like people with chutzpah that speaks truth to power, or cuts through bullshit with aplomb. America's love-hate relationship with the Palins evidences all of these factors.

What is fascinating about Palin is how much she is like George W. Bush. They both profess to be born-again Christians, though she is more the archetypal Saturday sinner/Sunday saint than he. Like him, she is immensely self-confident and has a knack for plain, albeit garbled, speech that appeals to the anti-intellectual spirit that lingers in America. There is something charmingly imperfect about them both, that appeals to average Americans who themselves struggle gamely through imperfect lives. Her professional history, like his, is littered with failures gussied up by historical revisionism – lipstick retroactively applied to a pig, if you'll forgive the resurrection of the aphorism from the presidential campaign. They were both mediocre governors with a surface bipartisan appeal that instantly vanished upon entry onto the national stage. Their public friendliness is directly at odds with a hard-right ideological stance combined with the use of scorched-earth, divisive campaign tactics and rhetoric. Neither have much use for facts and figures, as evidenced by Bush's sneering dismissal of Al Gore's criticism of Bush's Medicare plan during a 2000 presidential debate ("He's got great numbers. He talks about numbers. I'm beginning to think not only did he invent the Internet, but he invented the calculator.") For both, mastery of the issues is less desirable than what is achievable through personal charm and forcefulness of personality. For Palin, Bush should serve as a cautionary tale for what can befall under-qualified folks who live in an accountability-free bubble. Bush was simply unequal to the multi-pronged challenge of the presidency, which he won twice by dividing the country against itself. The results were catastrophic. Perhaps not coincidentally, former McCain (and Bush) campaign advisor Steve Schmidt opined that a 2012 Palin presidential candidacy would be "catastrophic."

This is of no import to Palin, who views the professional political consultant-class as a crowd of back-stabbing PR hacks who are more interested in protecting their career reputations than accomplishing anything of substance or import. She is quite right about this, and kudos to her for pointing it out. Her memoir deliciously skewers the Bush/Rove hacks who populated the McCain campaign apparatus, making fun of them for trying to control her diet and values message when they were a bunch of cynical, hard-drinking chain-smokers who couldn't come up with a positive message, much less stay on it. I have always wondered why these people continue to be recycled in losing campaign after losing campaign, and to be honest I liked Palin a little bit more for calling out Schmidt and other McCain operatives like Nicole Wallace as the political sea urchins they really are.

However, as evidenced by the rest of her book and her appearances thus far this week with Oprah, Barbara Walters, Sean Hannity, and Rush Limbaugh, nothing that has gone wrong so far in Palin's personal or professional life is her fault. She blames McCain's inept campaign staff for mishandling her and McCain both; she blames the campaign's ultimate loss to Obama on the collapse of the economy. The fact that she is at least partially correct on both of these issues does not change the fact that political consultants and mortgage-backed securities notwithstanding, she was an awful vice presidential candidate and let her state down after the campaign ended. She blames everyone but herself for the downward spiral that resulted in her mortifying resignation from the Alaska governorship, and has immersed herself in a very public mud-wrestling contest with a Playboy centerfold model who impregnated her daughter out of wedlock and has otherwise made himself famous for calling Palin a fraud of a mother and a politician. (Levi Johnston, at least, has the courage of his convictions and seems to have perfect clarity about whoring himself, unlike his former mother-in-law-to-be.) She is particularly fond of criticizing the liberal media elite, but has no problem accepting interviews with them to promote her book. She has outspokenly criticized political correctness, for example blaming it for the recent Fort Hood shootings, but insists on a double standard when it comes to her, for example deeming the Newsweek cover photo of her in a short skirt as "sexist." After slamming President Obama for "dithering" on foreign policy matters, in her book she invites Obama's secretary of state for a coffee date not to complain of the dithering, but to express a sister's sympathy for unfair media coverage. (A bewildered Clinton seemed to accept Palin's offer during a TV interview she gave from Singapore.)

A recent poll shows that anywhere between 60-70% of Americans believe Palin is not qualified to be president (compare the mirror figure for Hillary Clinton). Will this stop Palin's presidential ambitions? Of course not. 1,500 people lined up for her book-signing at a Michigan mall on November 18. (Presumably these people are among the unemployed.) This book tour will give Sarah Palin the political bug again, assuming she ever lost it. This is because the Palin movement is all about her, and reinforcing the bubble in which she lives. There is nothing better than an adoring crowd to make you forget about reality and create your own, especially with the help of cameras. This might be a useful skill in a time of peace and prosperity. But when our country grapples with the multiple threats of two wars, 10% unemployment, trillion-dollar deficits, 47 million without health insurance, and global warming, the times call for someone who can accept responsibility for what goes wrong instead of deflecting blame on others, while settling petty scores and painting oneself in the most flattering light possible. Palin's coyness about her political ambitions are irrelevant. It is a serious, dark time for America; Palin's unserious, frivolous nature makes her a perfect reality TV star. She is already that. What she is not is a viable presidential candidate, nor a credible political figure. Like 'The Real Housewives of Orange County,' the Palin reality show will jump the shark – if it hasn't already – and, one hopes, it will be canceled long before 2012.


Post Comment (22)  |  Email Robert Zimmer  |  View Robert Zimmer's 411 Profile

  Send To Friend  |    Stumble It!  |    Digg It!  | 



Please add your comment below.
If you are registered, you can login and post under your registered name. If not, you can post as a guest or register.

* Please note that 411 moderates all comments. Your comment will show up on the site after it has been approved by an editor.
 
Name : 
Comment : 
Remaining Characters : 
2800
 

Comments (22)

 
Excellent piece. I can't wait to see the damage control conducted by conservatives, libertarians, and the right leaning buffoons. This will truly be priceless....

Posted By: David (Guest)  on November 19, 2009 at 02:40 PM

 
 
"For Palin, Bush should serve as a cautionary tale for what can befall under-qualified folks who live in an accountability-free bubble."

They get to not only become President, but RE-ELECTED after getting the country into a war that, in even the nicest interpretations, it was questionable for us to be involved with in the first place?

Perhaps I can fall upward to a spot doing political columns for CNN, if THAT is the case...


Posted By: J. Alexander Mitchell (Registered)  on November 19, 2009 at 04:30 PM

 
 
There is nothing fascinating about Sarah Palin, unless you are easily fascinated.

"the times call for someone who can accept responsibility for what goes wrong instead of deflecting blame on others."

I couldn't agree more with the comment. I can't wait until an American politician surfaces that takes responsibility for their policies.

Reporting for Duutyyyyy!


Posted By: AdmChesterMynutz (Guest)  on November 19, 2009 at 04:51 PM

 
 
The one beautiful thing about Palin coming to West Michigan, where I live, was that Phish was playing on the East side of the state, thus giving me good reason to stay far, far away.

Posted By: CMS (Guest)  on November 19, 2009 at 05:01 PM

 
 
Great Piece agreed. But I am most sure that there will be someone who will not agree with you on the foolishness that she is doing. To me it seems that she likes making a damn fool out of herself. "I will not promote my book in democratic states", but yet she decides to come on the Oprah show. Which is in my city, which is democratic, and the last time I checked Oprah was a HUGE democratic supporter from the beginning. I wonder did she ever ask herself does my mouth get me in trouble. If not than she needs too, because her book is going to dig a even deeper hole for her in the end. Many people brought her book just to see what she had to talk about. Let us remember a well educated person took her words to write the book so that it could look right. I do not need to read her book to see how big of a dounce she really is because she has been showing that everyday since she was announced to be McCain Vice-President.

Posted By: pmoore (Registered)  on November 19, 2009 at 05:50 PM

 
 
Don't you want her to run for president is she's so stupid?? Easy win, right?

Or maybe all these attacks are cause you're scared?

I would love it if Sheila Jackson Lee, or Barbara Boxer, or Diane Feinstein, or Hillary Clinton, or Jennifer Granholm, or Kathleen Sebilus, or Maxine Waters, or Nancy Pelosi, or Kristen Hillenbrand, or Mary Landrieu or a whole host of other moronic and destructive liberal women politicians were going to run for President.

Landslide Republican win, in those scenarios.


Posted By: Da Man (Guest)  on November 19, 2009 at 06:57 PM

 
 
Recovery.gov listing false districts.

Goverment panels starting rationing of health care by recomending mammograms should not start till 50.

Civil trials and miranda rights for terrorists like KSM.

Unemployment at 10.2%



Whats wrong in Zimmers world ? Palin wrote a book.

When Obama wrote his two books, was he "whoring" himself out?


Keep up the hate of Palin, Limbaugh, Beck, Fox...........while the emperor has no clothes.


Posted By: John (Guest)  on November 19, 2009 at 07:01 PM

 
 
David-It's not really accurate to lump Palin, conservatives and libertarians together. First, Palin is not a conservative, she's a neo-conservative. As a libertarian(ish) I have no problem with old-school Goldwater conservatives. But neo-cons? Don't even get me started. Let me assure you that most libertarians hate Palin and Bush before her. What you have now is a rash of neo-cons /pretending/ to be libertarians. I'd like to know where they were when Bush was spending record amounts of money, running the economy into the ground and creating the largest, most wasteful department the US government has ever had.

It's a sad commentary on the media and American culture that Palin still gets any attention at all. Makes me miss seeing Paris Hilton on the "news" every day.


Posted By: Guest#2079 (Guest)  on November 19, 2009 at 07:06 PM

 
 
Zimmer sounds like a MSNBC wanna be.

Posted By: Guest#6883 (Guest)  on November 19, 2009 at 08:09 PM

 
 
I think I just read the last article on this website that I will ever read....but maybe I will come back for the hot celeb pics....

Posted By: Guest#6700 (Guest)  on November 19, 2009 at 08:33 PM

 
 
"times call for someone who can accept responsibility for what goes wrong instead of deflecting blame on others" Just like Obama has... right?

Posted By: MrMe11 (Guest)  on November 19, 2009 at 11:27 PM

 
 
... Meanwhile there is a war going on that the guy in the white house promised us we'd be out of (but then thought ole George W's plan wasn't that bad after all and stuck with it) escalating another war, but of course, doesn't even listen to his own hand picked general on the ground (but don't worry... "He's getting close to a decision)... unemployment at 10.2 and rising. Yep, Sarah Palin is certainly what I would be concerned with as an average american. Hey libs, we get it, you don't like Sarah Palin or George W. Bush. As a right-leaning buffoon as David calls me, I'm wondering when the David's and Zimmer's of the world are gonna start looking in the mirror and ask themselves if they have the sack to question Obama for doing the same things they criticized the "neo cons" for. BTW, you don't even know what a "neo con" is, so please stop using it. Thanks.

Posted By: gwpbrian (Guest)  on November 20, 2009 at 12:13 AM

 
 
think I just read the last article on this website that I will ever read....but maybe I will come back for the hot celeb pics....

Posted By: Guest#6700 (Guest) on November 19, 2009 at 08:33 PM

Reading an opinion different from your own is a healthy thing. Its good for the haunches!!


Posted By: Guest#0589 (Guest)  on November 20, 2009 at 02:23 AM

 
 
"times call for someone who can accept responsibility for what goes wrong instead of deflecting blame on others" Just like Obama has... right?

Posted By: MrMe11 (Guest) on November 19, 2009 at 11:27 PM

Aside from the economy, in which he is justified IMO, whom has Obama shifted blame upon?


Posted By: Guest#0091 (Guest)  on November 20, 2009 at 12:59 PM

 
 
It must drive Zimmer nuts that this dumb, conservative,"lying" "whore" has sold 300,000 books in one day.

That equalls almost all of Ed Schultz daily viewership on Msnbc. Pretty telling.

Meanwhile, according to the New York Times says Obamas Asian trip was a disaster.

Keep attacking Palin. Maybe no one will notice the failure in chief.


Posted By: Guest#7988 (Guest)  on November 20, 2009 at 02:02 PM

 
 
For reference and the name-calling I'm sure I will get, I just want to clarify. I am an independent. There, I said it.

Anyway, this is a great cautionary tale for Palin. I'm not saying the Republicans can't beat Obama in 3 years, but I am saying that Palin can't do it. The reason Reagan, Clintion, and Bush 2 got re-elected is simple. They had charisma and personal likability. Obama has that in spades, and then some. Palin doesn't. The key to winning an election is to appeal to the independents. Those on the left and the right have already made up their minds, and the people you have to win over are the middle. I don't use independent here to say left or right, but merely unaffiliated with either party. Most of the people who claim to be independent are the ones who simply don't keep up with politics. They may pay attention to big things, like the economy and the War on Terror, but when they vote, they'll almost always end up voting for the person they like the most personally.

Palin has shown she doesn't appeal to anyone outside of the base. It's sad because while I like Obama, he's botched a few things and if the Republicans have someone I thought was better I would vote for him or her. It's not that Palin is a leader in the party and has enough national renown to win the Republican nomination, it's that right now she's the ONLY one. Who else is there in the Republlican Party? The ones with enough credibility to run a year ago don't seem to well off now. SC Governor Mark Sanford has been publicly destroyed. FL Governor Charlie Crist may not even win the primary next year because the right wing of the party is opposing him. MN Governor Tim Pawlenty would be a good, solid choice, but the right wing doesn't like him and he'd never make it through the primary, especially against someone like Palin that they would fight for. Huckabee and Romney already have the "loser" stigma and wouldn't be able to overcome that against Palin.

So, unless the political landscape changes in the next two years to give us some better candidates, it looks like Sarah Palin is the ONLY realistic option for the Republicans in 2012. And she'll lose.

The problem is that Republicans can't accept that. Since they believe that Obama is terrible, they naturally assume everyone else thinks the same thing. If Palin wins the primary, Obama will cruise to the White House because most people like him and don't like her. Its that simple.

If you can't see that, then John was right and you need to take the blinders off and realize that the Emperor has no clothes.


Posted By: General Sandoval (Guest)  on November 20, 2009 at 03:46 PM

 
 
"Don't you want her to run for president is she's so stupid?? Easy win, right?

Or maybe all these attacks are cause you're scared?

I would love it if Sheila Jackson Lee, or Barbara Boxer, or Diane Feinstein, or Hillary Clinton, or Jennifer Granholm, or Kathleen Sebilus, or Maxine Waters, or Nancy Pelosi, or Kristen Hillenbrand, or Mary Landrieu or a whole host of other moronic and destructive liberal women politicians were going to run for President.

Landslide Republican win, in those scenarios."

Da Man,
Really? Really!? Ok yeah, let Sarah Palin run for president. See how well that works out for the Republican Party. Palin is a no-nothing partisan hack who has pissed away any credibility she might have had in the year since the presidential election.

Hey, by the way, notice how I didn't mention Sheila Jackson Lee, or Barbara Boxer, or Diane Feinstein, or Hillary Clinton, or Jennifer Granholm, or Kathleen Sebilus, or Maxine Waters, or Nancy Pelosi, or Kristen Hillenbrand, or Mary Landrieu. Thats because we're not talking about them, we're talking about Sarah Palin. When one of them declares candidacy for the president, THEN we'll talk. What you're doing is trying to shift the argument because you know Palin's not qualified.


Posted By: Jlevysan (Guest)  on November 20, 2009 at 06:28 PM

 
 
jlevysan

When Palin announces that she's running, let me know, and then we can talk. All we know her as now is the governor for less than 1 term, and a VP candidate (huge difference from being the actual presidential candidate), and now the author of a best selling book.

And what audacity! She WROTE A BOOK AND WHORED HERSELF OUT. Didn't she know that she was supposed to go into the fetal position like Bush did for 8 years and just let the extremists like Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann, and Rachel Maddow shovel shit on her? How DARE her defend herself!?!?! You people need to get lives. And Guest 0091, maybe you can explain to me exactly what Obama has done different than Bush on the economy other than outspend him in less than 1 year in office (which he criticized Bush for relentlessly on the campaign trail for 2 years). Obama lost the "inherit" cop out when he became Bush on steroids domestically. Only the uninformed like David or Robert Zimmer would try to have you believe the opposite, because they would follow Obama off a cliff if he asked them too.


Posted By: gwpbrian (Guest)  on November 20, 2009 at 10:21 PM

 
 
Only the uninformed like David or Robert Zimmer would try to have you believe the opposite, because they would follow Obama off a cliff if he asked them too.

Posted By: gwpbrian (Guest) on November 20, 2009 at 10:21 PM

Isnt using hyperbole in an attempt to get a point across just the greatest?


Posted By: Guest#1188 (Guest)  on November 21, 2009 at 10:16 AM

 
 
gwpbrian,

I'm not sure what your criticism of my argument is. Da Man was speaking about Sarah Palin hypothetically running for president. I responded with what I thought would happen if she ran.

Now as for only knowing her as a governor and vp candidate, yes i agree that they are not the same thing as running for president. However on the campaign trail last year some people did this silly thing called "listening to the things she says" so we actually CAN make some educated guesses about how she would be as president/a presidential candidate.


Posted By: Jlevysan (Guest)  on November 22, 2009 at 04:35 AM

 
 
gwpbrian,
I don't think the issue is whether or not Palin whored herself out by writing a book it's that it is packed full of falsehoods and half-truths and that she continues to make a fool of her self every time she opens her mouth.


Posted By: Barry B. (Guest)  on November 24, 2009 at 10:20 AM

 
 
Yeah, Robert....because Biden has been such a winner as V.P. Please, you partisan douche. Palin sucks, no doubt about it, but why don't to write about the dickheads are are IN power, that people like YOU put there, and you'll see that next to them, Palin really isn't that bad. LMGDAO!!!

Posted By: Zimmer Fan (Guest)  on November 24, 2009 at 05:18 PM

 
STAY CURRENT




Advertisement



www.41mania.com
Copyright � 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.