Coakley Loses and the Dems are in Trouble
Posted by Joe Rivett on 01.19.2010
Americans want change but like the Beatles they never wanted a revolution!
A lot can change in one year. A year ago, I would have never thought Ted Kennedy's seat would be held by a Republican. But a lot can change in a year. With the Democrats holding a 60 seat majority in the Senate, many independents have rightfully grown weary of giving them even more power. The Democrats have focused so heavily on health care but they haven't listened to the American people. The American people, most of which supported Obama want small changes. They like the idea of not being dropped due to pre-existing conditions. They like the idea of reigning in Medicare waste. But they don't want to see the system radically changed. And when legislation insures 30 million more people; this is what you would call radical change.
Instead of piling everything into one bill, the Democrats should have focused more on making health insurance companies more accountable. That is something most Americans wanted. They also should have focused more on making health care costs more affordable. By spending tons of political capital on a dead public option, allowing Republicans to stand up for Medicare, (Something that I still can't wrap my head around), and exchanges, they forgot that most voters already had health insurance and were somewhat happy with it. They wanted change but not a revolution. Most Americans were afraid that adding 30 million to the system would create a huge demand and short supply thus increasing the cost of service. In addition, government health programs like Medicare and Medicaid cost the most so they weren't buying the idea that a public option was going to be cost effective.
Obama fixed one of Clinton's problems. Obama got the drug companies, insurance companies and some health providers on board. However, he forgot the grassroots AKA the American people. On top of this, Coakley forgot her grassroots and was apparently on vacation in December. She assumed she would win and tried to make the election national while Brown was smart enough to make it local. He stood up for Massachusetts and won.
I've always said the Democrats will lose some seats but if they don't turn things around, they could lose their majority, especially in the House. With the Wall Street crisis, they should be focusing on reigning in stupid banks and turning the economy around. You know… Populism! Instead somehow the Party that represents Wall Street and tax cuts for the wealthy has taken the role of the populists.
My prescription to minimize losses in November for the Democrats is simple, "It's the economy… stupid." Get rid of insurance discrimination and quickly vote for the things the majority of people and politicians support and then move on to the economy. Oh yeah, forget cap and trade!
For the Republicans, keep in mind that America is not embracing you and is sending the Democrats a message. Don't think this message means they necessarily want your agenda either.
This Government-Intrusion bill has nothing to do with health care. Aside from being a Republican-hater, you seem lost, man.
Posted By: Cabbage (Guest) on January 19, 2010 at 11:21 PM
No Comment
Posted By: CDL (Guest) on January 20, 2010 at 12:14 AM
These days, both parties are controlled by their extremists. The center decides the elections by voting against whichever party scares them more at the moment -- generally the party in power.
This will continue until one party comes to its senses; gets dragged to them by a charismatic, but rational, leader; or (least likely) a third party gets enough support to be a reasonable alternative. Until then, gridlock is probably best for this nation.
Posted By: CDL (Guest) on January 20, 2010 at 12:17 AM
This is just standard thoroughfare in American politics. If something sucks it will get replaced by an alternative. Coakley was an idiot, so it only serves that a Republican would win provided the GOP didn't put up someone dumber. Perfect example, in '04 Bush practically handed the election over to the Dems but the Dems put up a bigger idiot in Kerry. 2008 went to the Dems mainly because of the dissatisfaction with Bush. If people are extremely dissatisfied with Obama in '12, they will vote GOP again provided the GOP doesn't put up someone worse.
Posted By: Fury (Guest) on January 20, 2010 at 12:18 AM
Firstly, let's not get over-excited. Moderate Republicans have managed to win state wide races in Mass before - its only a couple of years since they held the Governorship. It's certainly no weirder than having a Dem Senator for Alaska or Dem Congressman for Idaho.
Secondly, the interesting thing is that Brown won by running from the centre-right and ignored great chunks of the what Palin and the wing-nuts on Fox keep demanding.
Compare this to what happened in the New York special election where they got the candidate they wanted and promptly handed a seat to the Dems which had been Republican for something like a century.
The message is pretty clear for both sides, if you run a campaign (adminstration) which ignors the moderates you are going to be soundly punished by the voters.
Hopefully, these results together with rumors that Murdoch and family are finally loosing patence with the more outlandish presenters on Fox might mean that Republicans start to get their act together.
Posted By: phils (Guest) on January 20, 2010 at 12:31 AM
Today is a great day for America. They have risen against the Obama machine and said that this was not change that they could believe in. Also, Ted Kennedy, the liberal lion s own seat went to a Republican. I'd laugh, but I won't rub salt into the wound...yet.
Posted By: Jimbob (Guest) on January 20, 2010 at 12:33 AM
While this article was fair-handed, it was also too short and rather uninspired. Rivett has done better.
Posted By: Guest#4033 (Guest) on January 20, 2010 at 12:34 AM
Clearly the people of Mass are sexist and racist.
Posted By: gwpbrian (Guest) on January 20, 2010 at 01:03 AM
I really loved watching Stewart going apopleptic about this.
How did he put it? "They'll be left with only ... a majority bigger than the Republicans ever did under Bush when they did whatever the fuck they wanted?"
If anyone wants to know why I, a liberal, am not a Democrat, it's because they literally have NO idea how to wield power, and it's embarrassing to watch. I mean, people are already pegging Barack Obama as a one-term president, and the only person at ALL who's been suggested as a viable candidate... has the IQ of Cheez Whiz. (And anyone who says otherwise about Palin either is Rush Limbaugh or wants to nail her. Wait, I think I'm being redundant.)
Posted By: MadmanJack (Registered) on January 20, 2010 at 02:50 AM
jimbob,
no they haven't. Scott Brown did not win because of some massive rejection of obama's policies. martha coakly was a bad candidate. a bad, bad candidate. she assumed that the senate race was a foregone conclusion (the same mistake that many people were making a couple of months ago) and ended up crashing and burning. that is all.
Posted By: Jlevysan (Guest) on January 20, 2010 at 04:10 AM
"The message is pretty clear for both sides, if you run a campaign (adminstration) which ignors the moderates you are going to be soundly punished by the voters."
This was a much smarter comment than the one that followed it. Perhaps we should stop there.
Posted By: Q:? (Guest) on January 20, 2010 at 05:43 AM
Most Americans are a bunch of scared retards. Someone yells "FIRE BAD!!" They run as far away from the fire as they can, instead of finding a comfortable distance from the fire.
Posted By: Coyotespaw (Guest) on January 20, 2010 at 06:04 AM
LOL, Last year the GOP was "in trouble" before that the democrats were "in trouble" before that the GOP was "in trouble". I'm noticing a pattern here. The American voter is the only one "in trouble".
Posted By: GTM (Guest) on January 20, 2010 at 08:16 AM
Pretty sure most americans are sick and tired of both parties. Tired of the constant back and forth between republicans and democrats and even tired of republican on republican and democrat on democrat. Tired that nothing EVER gets done to the benefit of the actual common people of this country, unless there is something to gain politically for one party or the other.
And most everyone is REALLY tired that no matter what party we are talking about it always being about partisan politics and neither side seems to be bright enough to understand this. Democrats are all "liberal tree huggers who are soft on everything and want to give us communism" and republicans are all "gun toting, bible thumping southerners who are warmongers who want ward and beaver cleaver back from the 1950's". Neither side has any idea how tired the average independent voter is tired of all of this nonsense.
Maybe if we ever had other parties than were viable we wouldn't be in this mess where the 2 big parties basically get to dictate what goes on in this country at the expense (often times) of the people of this country who often times believe everything from their leaders no questions asked - whether it be Bush with Iraq and the WMD's which we are still waiting to find, or Obama who was going to change the world but cant even get health care through his own party.
Most of us have turned into mindless sheep who follow one taling head or the other and believe their word like is the gospel and find it blasphemy to even challenge the person who is our parties nominee of and it has gotten to this point can't even draw into question what people like obermann or rush says without being called some name or another by those supporters.
Posted By: billy (Guest) on January 20, 2010 at 08:54 AM
It's always amusing to read what hicks have to say about politics. Keep up the hysterical comments folks. You always make me smile.
Posted By: el (Guest) on January 20, 2010 at 11:41 AM
She lost becuase people are pissed that unemployment went up to 10 percent after the stimulus failure. Add that to 100 million dollar show trials in New York for terrorists who already were being convicted in military tribunals, cap and trade, "cops acted stupidly", etc, etc
I suppose MSNBC can call Brown supporters racist. After all, Brown drives a truck and Yankee fan Schilling supports him.
Posted By: Guest#3413 (Guest) on January 20, 2010 at 01:44 PM
Obama = EPIC FAIL
Posted By: Guest#0579 (Guest) on January 20, 2010 at 07:06 PM
"and Yankee fan Schilling supports him"
Well, I expect there's never been a major race where there wasn't a Yankees fan on both sides. And so rationally I can't reject a candidate just because he has a Yankees fan as a supporter.
My gut, however...
Posted By: Pat Shepard (Guest) on January 20, 2010 at 07:46 PM
So The Messiah campaigned for Corzine, Deeds, Coakley and the Chicago Olympics...and got trounced everytime.
Maybe that guilty white vote isn't producing the sort of momentum they were expecting...that or Saul Alinsky is utterly failing them.
Posted By: SteveC (Guest) on January 20, 2010 at 09:46 PM
It's always amusing to read what hicks have to say about politics. Keep up the hysterical comments folks. You always make me smile.
I'm glad Democrats share you're dismissive, elitist attitude. November is going to be sweet!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted By: Brad (Guest) on January 22, 2010 at 04:59 PM