www.411mania.com
|
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// Check Out New Images From The Amazing Spider-Man
MUSIC
// Kanye West and Jay-Z's Watch the Throne 2 Confirmed
WRESTLING
// Click Here To Listen to the 411 on Wrestling Podcast LIVE!
POLITICS
// Obama Leads In Florida, Ohio, & VIrginia
MMA
// Click Here To Join 411's LIVE Bellator 70 Coverage!
GAMES
// WWE '13 Trailer Gets Leaked


  MY 411
User name
Password
Register now! | Forgot your password?
 MUST READ
//  Occupy Wall Street Protesters Arrested
//  Apparently Assassinating U.S. Citizens Without a Trial is Totally Cool If a Nobel Prize Winner Does It
//  Is Rick Perry a Racist?
//  Reminder – There is Still No Good Reason to Support the Death Penalty
//  Obama’s Jobs Plan Won’t Help the Long-Term Unemployed
//  Nanny State Now Wants to Regulate Nannies (and All Domestic Workers)
//  Obama's Jobs Speech
//  The Choice: Perry vs. Obama
SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds





Follow 411mania on Twitter!




Add 411 On Facebook
 



 
 411mania » Politics » Blog Entry
Anti-Masturbation Senate Candidate Captures Conservative Hearts
Posted by Enrique on 09.22.2010





And here I thought Alvin Greene would be this year's most heartwarming political candidate. The Republicans have countered with Delaware's Christine O'Donnell, who last week won a surprising primary to be the GOP's nominee for the U.S. Senate. While Mr. Greene has been indicted for showing pornography to an adult woman (apparently that's illegal in South Carolina), Ms. O'Donnell has gone on record opposing masturbation. As you may be aware, the subject of masturbation has been insufficiently addressed by our elected officials.

Other than Clinton, obviously. *rimshot*

Anyway, this O'Donnell seems like an interesting lady, and she's the rightwing's current crush. For all this talk about masturbation, where does she stand on the pressing issues facing America today? For our story this week, let's get to know Christine O'Donnell and make a lot of silly masturbation jokes.

The story so far…


Thank you for not touching yourself!

One might argue there are more important issues facing the voters of Delaware than what a candidate said many years ago about America's other favorite pastime. One could alternately argue voters don't always let important issues unduly influence their collective judgment. Factors like a candidate's physical attractiveness, height, weight, etc. play a significant role, and silly things like where a candidate went to church for 20 years or what he/she thinks about masturbation all fall under the umbrella of "character."

And O'Donnell certainly seems like a character. In her youth, she participated in some MTV show about abstinence and basically said masturbation is sinful. Well, of course it is – the only things worth doing in life are sinful. But a precious young O'Donnell went on camera in the 90's and proclaimed her opposition to one of the most popular activities among teenagers worldwide.



With all due respect, if there are two groups of people who lack important knowledge about masturbation, it's devout Christians and women. Regardless, I imagine convincing teenage boys to quit masturbating would be a hard difficult task. I'm sure O'Donnell meant well, but her pious attitude about the only game that never gets boring suggests an extremely conservative mentality that Delaware voters may find off-putting. Personally, I can't abide anyone who doesn't respect the act of masturbation – it's the only thing that separates us from animals, for god's sake.

But that was a long time ago. Hopefully, O'Donnell's faith has matured since then. And in fact, according to several MSM reports, she appears to hold a mainstream conservative view on homosexuality:

Newly revealed comments from 2006 show O'Donnell believed gays and lesbians suffer from an "identity disorder," putting her at odds with the American medical and psychological community and a majority of popular opinion.

"People are created in God's image. Homosexuality is an identity adopted through societal factors. It's an identity disorder," she told Wilmington News Journal reporter Victor Greto.
Oh, Christine. You seem so naïve and kinda sweet, I really want to like you.


I'm very excited about not masturbating!

None of that is to say she's not qualified to serve in the U.S. Senate. In fact, many right-leaning Americans must think she's exceedingly qualified – as of this writing, her official website says she's raised over $2.2 million since last week's primary victory. As long as we're at her website, let's have a look to see if there's anything embarrassing…

There's one section named Christine Counters where she answers "myths," such as "owes money to the IRS" and "did not get a college diploma." Right on, anyone who's an enemy of the IRS is a friend of middle America. She even posts the relevant documentation, which you have to admit is courteous for a politician. O'Donnell's birth certificate is not posted, for those keeping score at home.

One thing that's really endearing is Why Christine, which is her "on the issues" page. You'll be pleased to know O'Donnell's positions can be summarized in a mere 266 words. (I copied-and-pasted it and everything.) Here's half of it:

Energy: Supports a market-based approach to energy solutions that will keep competition high and energy prices low.

Values: Believes our country was founded on core values of faith, family and freedom and will fight to defend those values. Will always fight for maximum choice for parents about where to educate their kids, including private, parochial and charter schools or in the home.

Spending: Believes unrestrained government spending is eroding our freedom, destroying our economy and ceding our sovereignty to foreign debt- holders like China.

Accountability: Denounces corrupt pork-barrel politics, including earmarks, and will fight for increased transparency and performance information for every Federal program.
Short, to the point – we'd be lucky if all politicians were so lacking in ambition. I like the way she threw "like China" in there to let us know she's been reading up on this shit. And I think we can all agree not enough politicians are in favor of accountability. Furthermore, O'Donnell supports a "market-based approach to energy solutions." Spiffy. After spending less than a minute reading, I'm so excited about Christine's thoughtful and nuanced political philosophy I could almost masturbate.


No, please don't!

Despite her refreshing lack of political objectives, O'Donnell is facing an uphill battle. Sure, the usual conservative opinion-makers love her unconditionally, but early polling by Fox News shows her trailing Democrat Chris Coons by 15 points. Though I admire her unwillingness to make empty promises or advocate anything at all, a majority of voters don't seem to take O'Donnell seriously right now. She has her work cut out for her if she wishes to change that mindset in a few weeks.

But never mind that – what of masturbation? I think we can all agree that's the real issue here. Is there a candidate in America we can assume will be a strong proponent of masturbation if elected?


Naturally

Too bad he's a long shot. (Ahem.)


Post Comment (45)  |  Email Enrique  |  View Enrique's 411 Profile

  Send To Friend  |    Stumble It!  |    Digg It!  | 



Please add your comment below.
If you are registered, you can login and post under your registered name. If not, you can post as a guest or register.

* Please note that 411 moderates all comments. Your comment will show up on the site after it has been approved by an editor.
 
Name : 
Comment : 
Remaining Characters : 
2800
 

Comments (45)

 
So no bukakke for her?

Posted By: Guest#6164 (Guest)  on September 22, 2010 at 08:44 PM

 
 
"With all due respect, if there are two groups of people who lack important knowledge about masturbation, it's devout Christians and women. "

Don't know about the first, but the second one is not accurate. I have first-hand knowledge...pun intended.


Posted By: MissyNEVERWearssocksWithShoes (Guest)  on September 22, 2010 at 09:15 PM

 
 
How can someone not masturbate when she looks like THAT??!!!

Posted By: Dogpound7382 (Guest)  on September 22, 2010 at 10:20 PM

 
 
"With all due respect, if there are two groups of people who lack important knowledge about masturbation, it's devout Christians and women. "

Don't know about the first, but the second one is not accurate. I have first-hand knowledge...pun intended.

Posted By: MissyNEVERWearssocksWithShoes (Guest) on September 22, 2010 at 09:15 PM

Giggity, giggity!


Posted By: the dude (Guest)  on September 22, 2010 at 10:25 PM

 
 
How can someone not masturbate when she looks like THAT??!!!

Posted By: Dogpound7382 (Guest) on September 22, 2010 at 10:20 PM

She doesn't want you to masturbate because if you don't she becomes super model hot to you. Hotness is relative to your options and when you last got release.


Posted By: Guest#0041 (Guest)  on September 22, 2010 at 10:34 PM

 
 
Oh, she masturbates.
She's not fooling anybody.

In those old videos you can tell she was a kinky whore behind closed doors.

Now we wait for her old sex pals to surface....


Posted By: PT Anderson (Guest)  on September 22, 2010 at 10:34 PM

 
 
Blow jobs in the oval office from a male democrat = acceptable

+

A conservative women believing masturbation is wrong = INCONCEIVABLE

=

Politics!


Posted By: Rehab (Guest)  on September 22, 2010 at 11:46 PM

 
 
And this steaming simpleton actually has a chance of a place in the US government??

Does explain a lot i guess


Posted By: Bob (Guest)  on September 22, 2010 at 11:56 PM

 
 
If anyone wants to protest her, all you have to do is get a bunch of hornball men, dress them in trenchcoats and nothing else, and have them bukakke all over her lawn...or when she's greeting the public in the streets...or on her limo

Posted By: Guest#3777 (Guest)  on September 22, 2010 at 11:59 PM

 
 
Blow jobs in the oval office from a male democrat = acceptable

Posted By: Rehab (Guest) on September 22, 2010 at 11:46 PM

What male Democrat was giving blowjobs? That's solely the province of closeted Republican representatives!


Posted By: Guest#1816 (Guest)  on September 23, 2010 at 12:48 AM

 
 
If anyone wants to protest her, all you have to do is get a bunch of hornball men, dress them in trenchcoats and nothing else, and have them bukakke all over her lawn...or when she's greeting the public in the streets...or on her limo

Posted By: Guest#3777 (Guest) on September 22, 2010 at 11:59 PM

This is the BEST idea EVER in the history of ANYTHING! Sign me up! I'll be the one wearing a Bea Arthur mask!


Posted By: Guest#6021 (Guest)  on September 23, 2010 at 01:05 AM

 
 
Blow jobs in the oval office from a male democrat = acceptable

+

A conservative women believing masturbation is wrong = INCONCEIVABLE

=

Politics!

Posted By: Rehab (Guest) on September 22, 2010 at 11:46 PM

President recieving blowjobs = Impeachment

+

President starts illegal war with false evidence = Totally fine

=

Republicans are fucking morons


Posted By: Bloodied (Guest)  on September 23, 2010 at 02:09 AM

 
 
Yeah, I'm sorry, but almost EVERYONE masturbates at least once in their life. I also cannot believe someone as hot as she is has been "sexually pure." If she has, then I only have one thing left to say: she needs to get laid ASAP.

Posted By: Michael (Guest)  on September 23, 2010 at 02:34 AM

 
 
Blow jobs in the oval office from a male democrat = acceptable

Posted By: Rehab (Guest) on September 22, 2010 at 11:46 PM

What male Democrat was giving blowjobs? That's solely the province of closeted Republican representatives!

Posted By: Guest#1816 (Guest) on September 23, 2010 at 12:48 AM

Fatality!


Posted By: Q:? (Guest)  on September 23, 2010 at 02:41 AM

 
 
I think she's cute. I'm jacking my rig to her pic right now.

Posted By: Anilingus (Guest)  on September 23, 2010 at 03:58 AM

 
 
I say MASTURBATION NOW AND MASTURBATION FOREVER!!!

Posted By: The Great Capt. Smooth (Guest)  on September 23, 2010 at 06:04 AM

 
 
I'm gonna bash one out now - my thoughts being locking her in a room with me and having her watch me as I grope and masturbate on her ass.

Posted By: The Stealer (Guest)  on September 23, 2010 at 06:24 AM

 
 
If there are any bare foot pics of her up, consider her masturbated to :-)

lol


But in all seriousness, what?!


Posted By: A.G. Awesome (Guest)  on September 23, 2010 at 07:18 AM

 
 
I think she IS a person who is genuine about what she believes and thinks she knows. However, much like Sarah Palin, she is also about as politically smart as a banana.

And for the record.... relying on the "market" for ANYTHING is not a smart idea. This is my one beef with the conservative viewpoint of letting the free market determine things. The market is driven by GREED and PROFIT. So in terms of solutions for anything, the market will only drive what's best for the market, not the general public.


Posted By: MDG Lite (Guest)  on September 23, 2010 at 08:15 AM

 
 
Witchcraft = OK
Torture = OK
Starting wars on false pretenses = ok

Masturbation = BAAAAD

Hurray Logic!!!!


Posted By: republitards (Guest)  on September 23, 2010 at 08:34 AM

 
 
yeah. She'd get it in the butt.

Posted By: jp (Guest)  on September 23, 2010 at 09:13 AM

 
 
ok guys im releasing my sex tape with her.

Posted By: Guest#7563 (Guest)  on September 23, 2010 at 09:27 AM

 
 
"The market is driven by GREED and PROFIT. So in terms of solutions for anything, the market will only drive what's best for the market, not the general public."

Posted By: MDG Lite (Guest) on September 23, 2010 at 08:15 AM

Idiot.

The public determines what the market does. If the "market" puts out a product that the public does not want, the public will not buy it, and the "market" will either change out of necessity, or it will tank. Look at Blockbuster and Netflix for a recent example.


Posted By: Guest#4660 (Guest)  on September 23, 2010 at 10:24 AM

 
 
Two thoughts here
1. I'm pretty sure chimps jerk it.
2. What does the O'Donnell household do when their/her dog humps her leg?


Posted By: NS (Guest)  on September 23, 2010 at 12:28 PM

 
 
President recieving blowjobs = Impeachment

+

President starts illegal war with false evidence = Totally fine

=

Republicans are fucking morons

Posted By: Bloodied (Guest) on September 23, 2010 at 02:09 AM

^ +1!

In this election cycle we're getting the same ol' GOP rhetoric: "cut taxes, the national deficit/debt is too high..." WAIT! How is cutting taxes going to REDUCE the deficit? All they want is to make SURE taxes are cut for the wealthy. But I doubt the Democrats have the stomach to force a vote on a) cutting taxes for the middle class while b) letting the Bush tax cuts EXPIRE for the top 2% of the population. Why they're squeamish about it, I don't know, because it would PROVE the GOP has only the interests of the wealthy at heart.

Screw the Republicans. They have the best interests of NO ONE reading ANYTHING at this website!


Posted By: Bake Dizzle (Guest)  on September 23, 2010 at 01:15 PM

 
 
The one thing I really have a problem with about O'Donnell is the way she sued her former employer (the conservative organization ISI) for "gender discrimination" and her supporters tendency to play the "sexism" card. These are not things that conservatives are supposed to be doing (in fact, isn't accusing people who don't support you of "sexism" what Hillary Clinton did after she blew the Democrat primary in 2008?), so they indicate to me that she is a hypocrite. Aren't conservatives supposed to be in favor of the private property rights of employers?

Anyway, if I remember correctly, the reason O'Donnell doesn't want you to masturbate is because, if you can pleasure yourself, why do you need her? Doesn't that sound like an admission of her own ineptness in bed (she has admitted that she is not a virgin)?


Posted By: Brad (Guest)  on September 23, 2010 at 01:37 PM

 
 
"The market is driven by GREED and PROFIT. So in terms of solutions for anything, the market will only drive what's best for the market, not the general public."

Posted By: MDG Lite (Guest) on September 23, 2010 at 08:15 AM

Idiot.

The public determines what the market does. If the "market" puts out a product that the public does not want, the public will not buy it, and the "market" will either change out of necessity, or it will tank. Look at Blockbuster and Netflix for a recent example.

Posted By: Guest#4660 (Guest) on September 23, 2010 at 10:24 AM

Great, so how does that help with our impending energy crisis? What "market solution" is there to that?


Posted By: Guest#6216 (Guest)  on September 23, 2010 at 01:50 PM

 
 
Okay, credit where credit is due, this is a pretty funny column. Your political views are moronic, but at least you're entertaining.

Posted By: Guest#4947 (Guest)  on September 23, 2010 at 02:08 PM

 
 
"Great, so how does that help with our impending energy crisis? What "market solution" is there to that?"

Posted By: Guest#6216 (Guest) on September 23, 2010 at 01:50 PM

LOL. What government solution is there?

I admit I know exactly Jack and Shit about solving an energy crisis, so I can't answer your question. And you know who else knows Jack and Shit about it? Ding Ding Ding! If you guessed Government, you win the big prize!

Just don't get all excited and jizz your pants, because jizz is bad, m'kay?


Posted By: Guest#2676 (Guest)  on September 23, 2010 at 02:36 PM

 
 
If I was a youth pastor with Hitchcock for a last name, I would probably also be against masturbation.

Also, I wish I could find a cute pic of her and force one, just based on principle... but I might develop some weird guilt complex. Er, worse than what I've already got...


Posted By: James (Registered) (Guest)  on September 23, 2010 at 03:01 PM

 
 
women in general should not be in politics. If you bleed, you cannot lead. I don't want a multi nation summit delayed because she's having her monthly "thing".

Posted By: Bryan Jones (Guest)  on September 23, 2010 at 05:04 PM

 
 
Would love to facial on her so damn much.

Posted By: Oh! Lymping Hero (Guest)  on September 23, 2010 at 06:26 PM

 
 
Idiot.

The public determines what the market does. If the "market" puts out a product that the public does not want, the public will not buy it, and the "market" will either change out of necessity, or it will tank. Look at Blockbuster and Netflix for a recent example.

Posted By: Guest#4660 (Guest) on September 23, 2010 at 10:24 AM

I'm not talking about the supermarket, dillweed.

The general public did not drive gas prices through the roof a couple of years ago..... it was a bunch of rich investors playing with the market on advice from their broker at Morgan Stanley. That whole mess was living proof that the market can be manipulated. The stock, securities and futures market are controlled by investors, and not every one has that kind of money to play with. The only "public" that drives the market are the people with enough MONEY to invest and play with their money that way.

In other words, there is NO WAY a bunch of super rich EXXON investors are going to support a new type of energy that competes with crude oil on the market. The stockholders of Exxon, Tetco, Shell, etc. are all doing very well, and do NOT want to see a new product that will drive the price of their cash cow down.

Again.... greed and profit.


Posted By: MDG Lite (Guest)  on September 23, 2010 at 06:30 PM

 
 
LET MY PEOPLE GO!!!

Posted By: Spermy Cummings (Guest)  on September 23, 2010 at 07:12 PM

 
 
The usual protocol for favoring a particular candidate is how they stand on any given issue that is a major concern for the general public. Too bad that she(and any other candidate) can't see that a personal agenda, especially as absurd as this one, isn't even relevant as it applies to voter interest. If this is her platform that she'll base her candidacy on, we're all in trouble.

Posted By: guest (Guest)  on September 23, 2010 at 07:28 PM

 
 
Being anti-masturbation is like being anti-Santa Claus or anti-fuzzy little bunnies...

Posted By: Dob Bole (Guest)  on September 23, 2010 at 07:39 PM

 
 
Blow jobs in the oval office from a male democrat = acceptable

Posted By: Rehab (Guest) on September 22, 2010 at 11:46 PM

What male Democrat was giving blowjobs? That's solely the province of closeted Republican representatives!

Posted By: Guest#1816 (Guest) on September 23, 2010 at 12:48 AM

Nice


Posted By: Guest#8870 (Guest)  on September 23, 2010 at 08:15 PM

 
 
Great, so how does that help with our impending energy crisis? What "market solution" is there to that?"

Posted By: Guest#6216 (Guest) on September 23, 2010 at 01:50 PM

LOL. What government solution is there?

I admit I know exactly Jack and Shit about solving an energy crisis, so I can't answer your question. And you know who else knows Jack and Shit about it? Ding Ding Ding! If you guessed Government, you win the big prize!

Just don't get all excited and jizz your pants, because jizz is bad, m'kay?

Posted By: Guest#2676 (Guest) on September 23, 2010 at 02:36 PM

You know who IS familar with the energy issues facing us? Scientists. You know, the sort of experts that conservatives like to spend all day bashing? The sort of experts who.. gasp.. head government panels!

If you think that oil companies are going to push themselves to develop alternate energy, you are sorely mistaken.

If you think that the economy wont crumble, on a global scale, when the price of oil doubles over the next two decades due to exploding demand and shrinking supply, you are mistaken.

But dont worry, people like Palin and O'Donnell, real intellectuals, will figure out a solution. Right?


Posted By: Guest#2311 (Guest)  on September 23, 2010 at 08:44 PM

 
 
Ain't no bitch gonna take away my constitutional right to spank it !!!

Posted By: Guest#2458 (Guest)  on September 23, 2010 at 08:46 PM

 
 
Its ok if you convince others you were sleeping when it happened. You have heard of sleep walkers,...sleep beaters, never.

Posted By: admchestermynutz (Guest)  on September 23, 2010 at 09:35 PM

 
 
masterbation hurts no one hell it probably helps keeping some socially unstable ppl in check

Posted By: Guest#3611 (Guest)  on September 23, 2010 at 11:10 PM

 
 
Pure lassiez faire economics does not work, because there are too many market failures.

1. Monopolies: When the costs of entering into the market become prohibitive, monopolies may emerge, which puts the consumers at the whim of the producers.

2. Excessive competition: This can indirectly lead to monopolies, as companies undercut each other pricewise, with only the biggest companies able to absorb the lost. Look at what happened to the record chains. Best Buy, Circuit City and other bigger stores killed them with pricing.

3. Tragedy of the Commons. When a good cannot be naturally limited, rationality suggests that people will consume as much. Think of a field where cows graze. If there weren't somebody to allocate parts of the field to certain farmers, it would become barren much more rapidly.

4. Externalities: This is what happens when the costs of a transaction are borne by someone other than the producer or the consumer, such as pollution.

5. Information assymetries. The producers automatically know more their product about the consumer, and they have a short-term incentive to be less than honest about potential problems. Yes, in the long-run the producer will lose customers (i.e. Toyota), but that doesn't help the consumer whose health or life is threatened by a dangerous product.

6. Free rider problem. People always want something for nothing, and when a good cannot be readily limited to a select group of people (police protection), someone has to step in and accrue payments somehow.

That is not to say that regulation is the be all end all, but neither is complete deregulation. Look at the recent messes we've gotten b/c of deregulation. Yes, airfare is much cheaper now than it was before dergulation, but having flown quite a bit in the last two years for various job interviews, I can tell you that the quality of the product has gone WAAAY WAAY downhill.


Posted By: Michael L (Guest)  on September 23, 2010 at 11:59 PM

 
 
*FAP FAP FAP*

Posted By: Mr. Excitement (Guest)  on September 24, 2010 at 12:12 AM

 
 
women in general should not be in politics. If you bleed, you cannot lead. I don't want a multi nation summit delayed because she's having her monthly "thing".

Posted By: Bryan Jones (Guest) on September 23, 2010 at 05:04 PM

In the Company of Men was an awesome movie. You should watch it.


Posted By: Guest#2088 (Guest)  on September 24, 2010 at 01:37 AM

 
 
women in general should not be in politics. If you bleed, you cannot lead. I don't want a multi nation summit delayed because she's having her monthly "thing".

Posted By: Bryan Jones (Guest) on September 23, 2010 at 05:04 PM

You are a fucking moron. 1950 called...they want their attitude back.


Posted By: MissyNEVERWearssocksWithShoes (Guest)  on September 26, 2010 at 12:27 AM

 
STAY CURRENT




Advertisement



www.41mania.com
Copyright (c) 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.