www.411mania.com
| Search
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// [Gossip] New Photos of Megan Fox -- Topless
MUSIC
// SpikeTV Names Top 5 Worst Voices Of Rock
WRESTLING
// Dark Pegasus Video Review: No Mercy 2000
POLITICS
// Should Obama Pick A Republican As His VP?
MMA
// Antonio Rodrigo Nogueira & Frank Mir To Coach On Ultimate Fighter Season 8
SPORTS
// The Three Point Play: Celtics Still Winless on the Road, Plus the Spurs and Hornets Win at Home
GAMES
// 411 Games Fact or Fiction: New Gears of War 2 Footage, PC Piracy, Best 3rd-Party Wii Game This Year, Vocal EarthBound Fans, & More!


 MUST READ
//  Should Obama Pay Clinton's Campaign Debt?
//  Must Read Article On Obama's General Election Strategy
//  Some Early Thoughts About Who Obama Should Pick As His VP
//  Will Obama Inherit Bush's Messed-Up Middle East?
//  A Look Back At Clinton's Two Biggest Blunders
//  Numbers To Back Up Why Richardson Would Be Obama's Best VP Pick
//  Clinton Falls Into Huckabee Role -- What To Expect From Her Now
//  Gingrich Warns Of GOP Disaster In November
SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds
 





 
 411mania » Politics » Columns
Advertisement
Ted Kennedy Dismantles Clinton Talking Points
Posted by Jason Easley on 01.28.2008



The elder statesman and liberal conscious of the Democratic Party, Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-MA) delivered a dramatic emotional endorsement of Sen. Barack Obama for the Democratic nomination this afternoon. In the process of endorsing Obama, Kennedy went out of his way to repudiate the divisive politics that the Clinton campaign practiced in South Carolina. Kennedy dismissed Clinton's experience argument by saying, "What counts in our leadership is not the length of years in Washington, but the reach of our vision, the strength of our beliefs, and that rare quality of mind and spirit that can call forth the best in our country and our people."

Kennedy also spoke against using the issue of race. "With Barack Obama, we will turn the page on the old politics of misrepresentation and distortion. With Barack Obama, we will close the book on the old politics of race against race, gender against gender, ethnic group against ethnic group, and straight against gay." When Democrats speak about the "old politics" more and more often that is code for the political warfare of the Clinton years, there is a true backlash in the party against the politics of destruction that the Clintons are practicing in this campaign.

During his remarks, Sen. Kennedy rejected the Clintonian idea of incremental change. "So let us reject the counsels of doubt and calculation. Let us remember that when Franklin Roosevelt envisioned Social Security, he didn't decide—no, it was too ambitious, too big a dream, too hard. When John Kennedy thought of going to the moon, he didn't say no, it was too far, maybe we couldn't get there and shouldn't even try. I am convinced we can reach our goals only if we are "not petty when our cause is so great"-- only if we find a way past the stale ideas and stalemate of our times – only if we replace the politics of fear with the politics of hope – and only if we have the courage to choose change."

Kennedy said that Obama is ready to be president on day one. "I know that he's ready to be President on day one. And when he raises his hand on Inauguration Day, at that very moment, we will lift the spirits of our nation and begin to restore America's standing in the world. There was another time, when another young candidate was running for President and challenging America to cross a New Frontier. He faced public criticism from the preceding Democratic President, who was widely respected in the party. Harry Truman said we needed "someone with greater experience"—and added: "May I urge you to be patient." And John Kennedy replied: "The world is changing. The old ways will not do…It is time for a new generation of leadership.""

The Clinton campaign is doing their best to down play this endorsement, but I don't think that its impact can be overstated. One of the interesting subtexts of this story is that there may be no greater face of the Democratic establishment than Ted Kennedy. It is a politically seismic event when someone as engrained in the party as Kennedy is goes against the establishment, and throws his support behind a political outsider.

Kennedy's endorsement will help Obama with key demographics of the Clinton constituency. He still resonates strongly with older Democrats, and blue collar workers. Strategically what is going on here is the Obama campaign is trying to cut down Clinton's base of support to what it was in South Carolina, white women. What we are witnessing is a tooth and nail battle for every single Democratic vote. This is an historic struggle, and one that I don't expect will end any time soon.


Post Comment (6)  |  Email Jason Easley  |  View Jason Easley's 411 Profile

  Send To Friend  |    Stumble It!  |    Digg It!  | 



Please add your comment below.
If you are registered, you can login and post under your registered name. If not, you can post as a guest or register.

* Please note that 411 moderates all comments. Your comment will show up on the site after it has been approved by an editor.
 
Name : 
Comment : 
Remaining Characters : 
2800
 

Comments (6)

 
It's clear now that Obama has all the momentum and that the Clintons can no
longer hope to turn the tide.  She is falling, and he is rising.  The defining
question is: With only a few days left before the multistate primaries, will he
catch her in time?

Posted By: quill (Guest)  on January 28, 2008 at 04:23 PM

 
 
this might just be a conservative's dream come true... hillary getting
embarassed in the primaries and then being able to run ads against Obama by
lumping him in with Kennedy and Kerry... I am no longer scared of BO in a
general election!

Posted By: chris (Guest)  on January 28, 2008 at 08:13 PM

 
 
It is being very well published today, 1-29-08, that the Kennedy clan does not
totally endorse Obama and that Ted needs to realize he does not control all of
the Kennedy clan votes. How dare he say the Kennedy family backs Obama. If he
wants to use the word "I" thats fine, but he needs to keep his big
mouth to himself.
  And Clinton as Obamas VP? That's some kind of Obama garbage.

Posted By: Guest (Guest)  on January 29, 2008 at 01:10 PM

 
 
KENNEDYYYYY!!!!!!!

Posted By: Jason (Guest)  on January 29, 2008 at 05:21 PM

 
 
Take it Ted Kennedy's statement was what it is...information for to help decide
who is best to lead this country, after 7+ years of lack of true leadership
from the White House. The winds of change are too strong to elect anyone but
Hilliary or Barack. With Romney and McCain toeing the line with Bush, Mr. 25%
approval guy, either are doomed to defeat.

Posted By: Don (Guest)  on January 30, 2008 at 10:36 AM

 
 
As to the concervative dream, I highly doubt you will find it so easy to beat
obama, not only does he have real change and long term plans in mind, but he
also has one thing many conservative politicians have always lacked. He
listens, reaches out and atleast seemingly cares more for the vote and view of
both sides of the eisle. The obama campaigne for the little states as well as
the fight for the major democratic states shows this and much more, that when
obama gets the nomination he will treat it even more openly and seriously. The
partisan lines end when obama begins.

As as for the comment of "How dare he say the Kennedy family backs Obama.
If he
wants to use the word "I" thats fine, but he needs to keep his big
mouth to himself.
  And Clinton as Obamas VP? That's some kind of Obama garbage."
I may well be mistaken but is it not ted kennedy that is the last active member
of the "kennedy clan" that is in the democratic party? Is is not ted
kennedy speaking for his immediate family, who are we to judge what one man
feels his family views, you don't know that they arent all with him, that kind
of thinking is what made the clinton's believe they could say any kind of
slandor about a fellow dem and still get the big backing of the real democratic
legends. And calling any statement that may or may not have origins in a
political campaigne's hopes or understandings of possible future events is not
only rediculous but also so very red in its practice. I mean no offense to any
party or political side, but lets face it, all the old guard is saying is we
know how to run a campaigne now watch us go out of our way to not mention how
and try and tear down our opposition. Is that not alittle dirty? Maybe even go
so far as to divisive and pointless, if as they all claim he is the dem who
will get a republican victory, if he is the dem who doesn't know where he
stands? Pardon me for being passionate, but I think alittle lively and forward
thinking activity is just what is needed, and thank you for the great article I
very much enjoyed it.

Posted By: Stephen (Guest)  on January 30, 2008 at 10:56 AM

 


www.41mania.com
Copyright © 2005 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.