...or "The Death of the American Auto Industry and Why We Shouldn't Let Them Die"
I'm sure most of you saw Quantum of Solace this past weekend. I'm also sure most of you remarked to yourself "shit, why do they have James Bond driving a Ford again?!"
Well...at least I said that.
It's a shame our auto industry is so pathetic and hobbled that the sight of a fictional character driving an American car in a movie is giggle-worthy. With the country fixated on the drama surrounding the possible bailout of the so-called "Big Three" (or more appropriately, "The Three Stooges") auto-makers, I thought I'd do a little digging into what new wares Ford chose to hock in the latest Bond film.
First up is the Ford Ka, which you might have seen the newest Bond girl, Camille, driving during the Haiti sequence. The first thing that jumps out at me is that this car isn't available in the United States. Usually, when you hear about a car being sold exclusively in Europe, it means one thing: it's small and gets great gas mileage. There are multiple variations on this line, with the most economical cars getting up to 45.6 miles per gallon.
It also looks like a Geo Prism.
For those of you who remember the Geo, you know that I am not throwing out a compliment.
The other Ford that features prominantly is the Edge. The Edge IS available in the United States. It's a sporty SUV, or what the industry calls a "crossover" SUV because it has the space of a larger vehicle with the performance of a regular sedan. It gets a whopping 17 MPG in the city and 24 MPG on the highway. Now that sounds more like an American car to me. A solid kick to the ol' pocketbook, an Edge will run you from $24,000 to $30,000. A Ford Ka that gets 40 MPG will cost a European 7,995 Euros, which is about $16,000.
High prices and low gas mileage "come standard" in most American cars. That sticker shock shouldn't come as any surprise to you all. What should be surprising is a little detail in that first blog article about the Edge. In Quantum of Solace, Bond drives a Ford Edge during the final act of the movie. If you look closely, it's labeled as a "Hydrogen fuel cell" car. Guess what? Ford doesn't sell Hydrogen fuel cell Edges. That car wasn't even running on Hydrogen. It was a regular gas guzzler with some stickers slapped on it.
But fret not, little children Ford promises to put their "HySeries" Edges on the market soon! 2010, you'll get a REAL version of the planet-saving car James Bond pretended to drive in Quantum of Solace...if you live in Canada.
You all live in Canada, right?
Wait, you don't? A lot of you live in America? And you want to drive a Hydrogen fuel cell car? Have you learned nothing? When it comes to the American market, the Three Stooges talk a lot, they spends millions of dollars (much of it from government subsidies) desiging "alternative fuel" cars and then never put them into the hands of consumers. The American car industry is the proverbial snake eating its own tail, unwilling to innovate. And make no mistake about it, it is an unwillingness, not an inability. GM, Ford and Chevy had (operative word is "had") billions of dollars at their disposal to get the electric car up and running, to beat the Japanese to hybrid technology. All of these opportunities were squandered. The Three Stooges' commitment to alternative energy is as fake as that Hydrogen car from the Bond movie. Throwing a sticker on a car doesn't make it efficient. Throwing billions of dollars at a car company doesn't make that company efficient either.
Outside of the most strident fiscal conservatives, few Americans want to see these companies liquidate. The domino effect would be catastrophic, leaving countless layoffs in its wake. What your average William F. Buckley wannabe says is "they made bad business decisions, so let them die." My heart doesn't typically bleed for rich old white guys either, but consider the fact that this is the absolute best time in recent history for the American government to assert its authority over the future of transportation in the country.
The automakers are desperate for a handout. The United States will go on without GM, but can GM go on without the help of the United States. Not bloody likely. The preconditions for a GM bailout should be as thick as the Manhattan phone book. Emission standards, mandatory alternative fuel models with hard release dates that can't be screwed with, temporary congressional oversight; they should all be on the table. GM can be an almighty beast of progress, a company that can credibly compete with the Japanese for the American auto market. Our government will just have to see this moment and take it.
It is clear that the entrepreneurs of Detroit have failed us. The braindrain in the auto industry is shocking. The best and the brightest flock to Silicon Valley, and no one can blame them. Who wants to work at a company run by modern-day robber barons? GM can make the "People's Car" in a time of economic strife; a vehicle made on a budget for people on a budget. People want sleek, efficient cars, so let's give it to them. Take that tail out of the snake's mouth and set him loose on Toyota.
GM's Volt is an evolutionary step towards fuel cell car mass production and fuel cell car mass production recently had a major tech breakthrough, google gore tex fuel cell for info. That maybe enough to get US to fuel cell car mass production with water vapor exhaust, 10 year life with relatively no/low maintenance and 3 to 4 times the mileage per energy unit.
Posted By: Toes (Guest) on November 19, 2008 at 03:04 AM
Great article... I couldn't agree more with your point about the U.S. having a chance to actually influence the direction of American transportation policy. You do realize though, that within the next few hours at least 3 people will accuse you of being a socialist right? That's the in thing these days!
Posted By: Riverbottom Nightmare (Guest) on November 19, 2008 at 07:51 AM
I'm crossing my fingers for the Volt, but I only continue to be disgusted by the heads of these companies. To go to Washington and have the balls to claim that mismanagement has nothing to do with their companies teetering on the edge of falling apart is shocking. Truly shocking.
Posted By: Dave Schilling (Registered) on November 19, 2008 at 11:44 AM
The new Fusion has been debuted including hybrid variant. Not going to tout its technological or styling attractiveness, nor list its specs relative to foreign competitors. Search for yourself.
Have you checked the gas mileage and pricing on foreign SUV, full-size seadans and Trucks. High prices, low gas mileage and they can't sell them fast enough.
GM and Toyota have designed cars through join-venture engineering for over twenty years.
The Geo that you so quickly dismiss, designed by Toyota, built Joint Venture, sold by Chevy dealers as Geo.
Currently the Carolla, Matrix and Vibe are all joint-venture designs produced and sold through both Toyota and Pontiac dealers. They are the same cars.
I have two friends who were laid-off from Chrysler Assembly Plant in Fenton, Missouri last month. Neither of them are stooges and they built a fine vehicle in the Minivan.
You also may be unaware of the three all electric vehicles that have been debuted by Chrysler. Over the weekend an impromptu drag was arranged between the new Challenger SRT8 and the Dodge eV in Pasadena.... the eV smoked SRT8.
I think it more productive to stop the player hating and start helping the innovating. Try looking at the new product lines and you may learn that a 1970s perspective of American auto manufacturing is a bit, well, dated.
Posted By: AdmChesterMynutz (Guest) on November 19, 2008 at 12:55 PM
The autoworker unions have to share responsibility for the high prices we see for American built vehicles. The high wages they have managed to extort from the industry through strike action is obscene - unless you're a line worker. Then you're happier than a pig in shiite.
Posted By: Mikel (too lazy to log in) (Guest) on November 19, 2008 at 02:03 PM
Very good, thought-provoking article Dave. However, the sloppiness really hurts it:
- Despite being about the 'Big Three', not once in the article is Chrysler mentioned ("GM, Ford, and Chevy"???)
- Where in that article did it say that vehicles made at the Oakville plant wouldn't be for sale in the States? That's a pretty ridiculous claim, man. If you think the US would be hurt by a collapse of the American auto industry, take a trip to Southern Ontario!
All the same, you do present some interesting points to ponder; should just be taken with a little pinch of salt.
Posted By: Bisch (Guest) on November 19, 2008 at 05:17 PM
Adm,
The Corolla and the Matrix are not at all the same car, sorry. Were you confusing the Corolla with another make and model?
You have a good point about the Geo; there was one in the early 90s I believe which got 50 MPG highway. Where the fuck did that go? I'm sure if they brought it back it could give the Yaris a run for its money.
I may not be an expert, but I have a father who has been in the auto business for nearly forty years (mostly for GM and Ford) and even he advised my girlfriend and I to go for a Toyota or a Honda when buying our first car. I'll trust his judgment on which vehicles generally need to be serviced more often. That's another reason for the drop in proportional sales over the last decade - people are focused on the mileage exclusively it seems, but that's not all that consumers are taking into account.
But once more on the subject of mileage, has anyone ever seen 'Who Killed the Electric Car?' It is a clearly biased documentary, but quite informative and shocking nonetheless. Certainly gives me a little less sympathy for the 'Big Three'..
Posted By: Bisch (Guest) on November 19, 2008 at 05:26 PM
Well at least the big three CEOs showed alot of class showing up for hearing in congress in their private jets.Nothing says goverment susidy more than that type of leadership.After all we should be happy to pay 73 $ an hour in salary and benefits to the auto workers.That along with theose CEOs needing 29 million a year I can see why it is imperitive they rape the american taxpayer.A-HOLES .
Posted By: John (Guest) on November 20, 2008 at 01:18 AM
Having a strong Auto industry is good for this country's pride and economy bottom line. But getting a bailout when other companies are whoring themselves at Capital Hill isnt the right idea. Detroit's gotta show some new ideas instead of giving us more Ford Focuses and More Astro mini vans. Its time these companies earned their money.
BTW Ouroboros? Is Strider Hiryu going to Super Combo Capital Hill for some dough?
Posted By: Josh (Guest) on November 20, 2008 at 01:25 AM
and one of the main problems also with our us government, as far as the big 3, is the ethanol subsidy, that not only made fuel prices high, but also food prices high, becuase we were destroying corn, while in barzil they have sugar based ethanol which is cheaper and far more abundent, but becuase of the tarriffs on foregin cars into our country, we can't get sugar based ethanol, and it is the arogance of the unions, who want a bail-out, without restructuring the uaw's contract, which gives more to the higher ups in the union, then the workers itself, and also why would we give a bailout to gm which today ended at 2.46, and ford ended down also at 1.43
Posted By: coby preimesberger (Guest) on November 20, 2008 at 02:09 AM
Bisch,
I should have been more exact in my point. I am not confused but thank you for you for your assumption.
I meant the Matrix-Vibe are the same car and that the Corolla was badged and marketed as a Geo.
Adm.
Posted By: AdmChesterMynutz (Guest) on November 20, 2008 at 02:08 PM
I stand corrected as the Geo Prism was not a Corolla but an Isuzu. The Geo Metro was a Suzuki.
Posted By: AdmChesterMynutz (Guest) on November 20, 2008 at 02:32 PM
Q custom-fitted it as a fuel cell.
That dude can do anything.
Posted By: demOcratic (Guest) on November 20, 2008 at 02:48 PM
Thanks, Adm. I always get confused between asking a question and making an assumptive statement. I thought the punctuation used marked that I intended to former, but I can see now it was actually the latter. Thank you for your support.
But in fairness, it bears mentioning that the Matrix and Corolla have the same engine options.
Posted By: Bisch (Guest) on November 20, 2008 at 03:38 PM
I have to agree with some of the comments made about your article. To blame the "Big Three" for the lack of alternative fuels is a little short sighted. Our country does not currently have an infrastructure to deliver these fuels to the consumers. In my opinion one of the biggest issues here is that everyone is trying to find the one "answer" to this problem. We need to start thinking at the local or regional level. Electric cars would work well in the South, but poorly in the North due to cold weather conditions. Ethanol would be good for the midwest because of the corn being produced there. Hydrogen would be ideal for coastal areas. "The Big Three" don't have direct control over this, but they could help steer the way toward it.
This industry is also one of the few that I know of where you can spend tens of thousands of dollars on a product that you have to accept what they have in stock. Why not let people customize their car and, "gasp", wait for it to be delivered. Whichever company starts better controlling its supply line like this will save themselves countless millions in leftover inventory.
By no means do I believe that the American Auto Industry is perfect. But, they are in a position where they have to follow the market rather than lead it. This will take time and growing pain which unfortunately they may not have the stomach or fortitude for.
Its easy to start calling people stupid and mocking those that make the decisions. I would suggest being a little more constructive and looking at what can be salvaged from this mess.
Posted By: obrie007 (Guest) on November 20, 2008 at 09:09 PM