www.411mania.com
Search
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// [Gossip] Kim Kardashian Classes It Up For GQ
MUSIC
// Top Ten Albums from 2005
WRESTLING
// 411 PPV Roundtable Preview: WWE Survivor Series 2009
POLITICS
// 411 Politics RoundTable: Thoughts On The Ft. Hood Massacre
MMA
// 411's Roundtable Preview - UFC 106: Ortiz vs. Griffin 2
BOXING
// 411 Roundtable Preview: Kessler vs. Ward
GAMES
// Top 10 Action Role Playing Games




SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds





Follow 411mania on Twitter!




Add 411 On Facebook
 



 
411mania » The 411 » Matthew Craggs
Picture:
Name:Matthew Craggs
Email:mlcraggs@gmail.com
Current Roles:I review films and DVDs and compile the Movie Zone roudntable.
Past Roles:Hemorroid sufferer number eight. "I can ride a bike again!"
Other credits:
Quote:I took what could have been a bad situation and managed to shoot him in the spine. I guess the next place he robs better have a ramp.
History:Matthew Craggs has a BA from Brock University (Film Studies) and a diploma from the Toronto Film School (Digital Video Editing and Design). He is currently contributing a couple of reviews a month to 411. He enjoys writing in third person, but that does not mean he is conceited.

Like everyone else at 411, Matthew Craggs enjoys watching wrestling.

Blog
And we're rolling... - 05.15.2006

I am not going to write a review of Poseiden because the Movie staff of 411 have beat me to the punch a number of times. My thoughts are scattered throughout those three reviews. You wouldn’t learn anything new if I wrote one, except this thought that crossed my mind half way through the picture. Since the staff has been encouraged to make use of this feature I may as well use it.

Firstly, let me say that the movie blew. On a scale of ten I have a hard time giving it a five. On a scale of five stars I have a hard time giving it two and a half. If I were to express my opinion in pie chart form, less than half of the pie would be filled. That isn’t to say there wasn’t the potential for a little more pie. The problem is that it refuses to try anything new.

Allow me to explain, loyal reader. About a third into the picture Kevin Dillon - who looks eerily like Matt Dillon. I know that they are brothers, but damn – is in a tricky situation. The group of our heroes have to cross a room on something steel. To be honest, I forget what it was. It looked like some sort of light rigging. The point is that it’s thin and steel.

Dillon wants to cross before the women and children. He mocks Kurt Russell, former firefighter and mayor of New York, with something that can only be called jackassery. “Oh, I forgot, man of the people, the hero, the firefighter, yadda yadda. Screw you, Russell, I’m going first.” So he does.

The intention is clear: make Dillon into a cartoonish jerk. The cheap suit and the pencil thin mustache contribute to this purpose. We are supposed to groan because he is insensitive and we are supposed to cheer when he eventually dies. After all, the guy wanted to get to high ground before the women.

Now imagine the same bit where Dillon’s character is less a caricature and more a human being. Instead of mocking Russell for his politics, what if he took a more realistic approach. “Look, Kurt Russell, I understand that you want the women and children to be safe, but if we want to get out of this boat, we’re going to need people who are strong, fast, and good under pressure. The women are frantic and the children are weak. If you were being crushed by a table and drowning would you trust me or the women running around with her head cut off?”

The end result is the same: We’re not a fan of the character and cheer when he dies. He’s as conniving and unlikable as he is in the scenario used in the film. The difference in my makeshift scenario comes in two ways:

First, it is an attempt to try something different. As it stands we don’t care about the characters because the characters are so simple and so black and white that we want them to drown so we can leave the theatre. There is no depth to the characters and no complexity to the film. If Dillon were to propose a reasonable but flawed and equally misogynistic reason for his safe passage provides that complexity. He’s a jerk, but he has a point. He is physically able to handle these disastrous conditions.

Second, it’s an attempt to try something new. The film is painfully cliché and we expect the dick with the pencil thin mustache to act like a cartoonish jerk. Try throwing us a curveball, cast and crew, and not make our characters so easy to like or dislike. Otherwise, you just have a boat filling with water.

Give me something. Give me anything. Give me a little hope that the flick will make even the smallest attempt to make me think or feel something I didn't expect to feel going in.

Regardless, the scene doesn’t make or break a film that is obviously broken. Poseidon is bland, unimaginative, and devoid of any of the thrills that come hand in hand with this straightforward genre.
And we're rolling... - 01.17.2006

For better or worse, I have been given a voice in the form of a 411 Mania blog. In the interest of using this voice for good, I want to direct you to Neil Medlyn's "The Naked and the Damned: Reality Fans Forsake ye American Idol for Blind Date."

http://www.nerve.com/screeningroom/tv/blinddate/

"As the new season of American Idol dawns, I'd like to suggest you do something important: tune in to Blind Date instead. Cast aside the boring narrative arc of the search for the next Kelly Clarkson. Do not celebrate with Simon and Paula and Randy the careful, bland contestants who are only nominally different, never crazy or brazen. It's unAmerican! Blind Date, on the other hand, is perfectly American, carrying on our proudest tradition: taking it to the next level. The daters on Blind Date offer a stronger, more fun, more positive message than all the hopeful, talented, beige-bedecked youngsters on American Idol put together..."

Yeah, I may be sending you to a seperate site for a brief momeny, but you're not going to find Neil Medlyn here, so...
And we're rolling... - 01.11.2006

First and foremost, it is a damned shame that I don’t get to review more movies. I saw the Geisha picture while there were already two reviews at 411. The Hostel picture is out and there are three reviews. This type of thing is no doubt my own fault for not getting off my ass and doing my work. It’s a shame 411 doesn’t need a good Geisha review because something vexed me when I browsed the good press the film has received everywhere.



Memoirs of a Geisha is beautifully photographed, no doubt. The cramped urban landscape evokes the ambience a western audience would expect from Japan in the late 1920s to world war two. Natives bump into each other on the street like the videos of Japanese business men being crammed on the subway that circulates the net. Geisha’s pour sake with the care of a mother setting down her new born. Men are probed with flattering questions that are theoretical enough to cause a “Huh, how ‘bout that?” but simple enough to avoid thinking too hard. It all looks like how we want to remember the place and time.



The story isn’t half bad either. I cared about the ultimate fate of Ziyi Zhang’s Sayuri, and the abnormally high number of puffy balls of blue hair that dotted the audience cared as well. The characters speak English, which ruined my suture at moments, but I wanted to see how our protagonist would end up with the rich businessman. If I can believe Hitler spoke English in Max I can accept the magical movie Japan where English is the native language.



The movie is technically good, but I can’t help but think about the way we interpret the narrative as a love story and coo at the appropriate ending. Without spoiling any of the obvious plot points, certain Geisha’s feel certain feelings for certain client’s. Eventually, some of these certain Geisha’s end up with their certain favorite clients, and are sponsored. This doesn’t mean much more than waiting on the client and acting as a mistress. The final voiceover states that this is the most a Geisha can want. We don’t care if a Geisha can want more because the relationship between certain client’s and certain rich businessman are meant to make us feel what we are supposed to feel at the end of an American movie: Awww.



The life of Sayuri is romanticized, despite her constant challenges and misfortunes, and makes us forget about a few things.


1) Sayuri was sold by her father and separated from her sister before she turned 10. She saw her sister only once, very briefly, as they planned an escape from the world of Geisha and prostitution.



2) Sayuri’s virginity was auctioned off. I believe the euphemism used in the film was “untouched cave.” There was also something about an eel in there.


3) As impressive as the village looked, it was cramped with what seemed like hundreds of thousand’s of people. There were miles of nothing but back-to-back houses, with streets packed with all sorts of seedy characters.


4) Geisha’s walk on very uncomfortable shoes, and spend their days stroking the ego’s of men who make more money in a week than I will in my lifetime.


In other words, we want to believe that the world of a geisha is hot shit. Even though the women who practice this custom are bought and sold at a young age, and rented for years to come, and even though your virginity can be auctioned off.


And we’re talking about the cinematography, or the subtle character development. (I’m not referring to the reviews on this site, by the way, but rather the general attitude of critics and the public.)


What do I think about this?


Well, thanks for asking. I think this attitude is a reflection of our tendency to view foreign cultures represented in American cinema with rose tinted glasses. Just think about that for a second.


"Yeah, I’m not a fan of the whoring, but they do things differently overseas and I have to respect that. It’s a totally different culture and we, the West, don’t have to understand."



True, but think of the way we treat prostitution in North America. I cannot legally walk down a street in America, outside of Vegas, and pick me up a nice hooker. On the flip side, I think I’m the only one in the world who realizes that a girl’s virginity was auctioned off in Memoirs of a Geisha.


I have nothing against prostitution. In fact, I know women who enjoy doing it. In fact, I think the government should do something – anything – to make it safe for these women to do their jobs. Similarly, I have nothing against the Geisha profession. If a woman enjoys walking in uncomfortable shoes while acting interested in corporate men for money, that’s wonderful for her. My point is that it says something about us when we celebrate the oldest profession in a historical Japanese context, and condemn the same profession in America.


I also think it’s telling that the American’s come during peace time and make the Japanese men who partake in the Geisha’s look like gentleman. Sure, it may be a little irking to see the virginity auction (which I come back to again and again, I know, I know) but watching rich American’s introduce themselves as "Name. How much?" puts things in perspective. The Japanese men get off on giving respect to their hired women. But there is still that discrepancy in the way the professions are treated.


And what does that discrepancy means? After all of this, I have to say that I don’t know. But it’s there, god damn it, and it means something.


In other news, Karla, the film about the brutal sex slayings by Paul Bernardo and Karla Hamolka, is hitting theatres in Canada January 20th. TV spots are starting this week and the press is all over it. If you have the means, give it a gander. I sure will and will have a review here at 411. Come back for that… like you would ever leave.

full blog
Archive
411 Movies Roundtable: March 2007 (03.06.2007)
The 411 Movies staff chimes in with their thoughts on the coming month.
411 Fact or Fiction Movies: Week 67 - Oscar Edition (02.23.2007)
Chad Webb and Tony Farinella talk all Oscar in a special edition of Movie Fact or Fiction.
411 Fact or Fiction Movies: Week 66 (02.16.2007)
This week Will Helm and Bryan Kristopowitz talk Ryan Phillipe, Wild Hogs, a Borat sequel, and more in Week 66 of Movie Fact or Fiction.
411 Fact or Fiction Movies: Week 65 (02.09.2007)
Ben Piper and Tim O'Sullivan talk a Meet the Parents sequel, Nic Cage, the Lost/24 square off, and the next Hannibal film in Week 65 of Movie Fact or Fiction.
411 Fact or Fiction Movies: Week 64 (02.02.2007)
George H. Sirois and JT talk Sam Raimi directing The Hobbit, spoof movies, Rachel McAdams in the new Batman film, and more (including JTs Hero's rant) in Week 64 of Movie Fact or Fiction.
411 Fact or Fiction Movies: Week 63 (01.26.2007)
Tony Farinella and Ben Moser talk Babel, Dream Girls, the Globes, Scorsese and more in Week 63 of Movie Fact or Fiction.
411 Fact or Fiction Movies: Week 62 (01.19.2007)
Steve Vicious and Al Norton talk TV in an all boob-tube version of Fact or Fiction.
411 Fact or Fiction Movies: Week 61 (01.12.2007)
J. Tithonus Pednaud and I talk Grindhouse, Eddie Murphy, Rosie's job security, James Cameron's 3D experience, and the Colbert/O'Reilly faceoff in Week 61 of Movie Fact or Fiction.
411 Fact or Fiction Movies: Week 60 (01.05.2007)
Chad Webb and Bryan Kristopowitz talk A Night at the Museum, Justin Timberlake, Spike Lee, and more in Week 60 of Movie Fact or Fiction.
411 Movies Roundtable: January 2007 (01.02.2007)
January is traditionally a slow month for movies. The 411 Movies staff chimes in with their look ahead for the month, and look back on the month that was.
411 Fact or Fiction Movies: Week 59 (12.22.2006)
Ben Piper and Scotty Flamingo talk A Christmas Story, Will Smith, Rosie O'Donnell and Identity in Week 59 of Movie Fact or Fiction.
411 Fact or Fiction Movies: Week 58 (12.15.2006)
JT and Scott Rutherford talk AFI's Movies of the Year, Apocalypto box office, a Bollywood George Clooney, On Demand services and the new Charlotte's Web in Week 58 of Movie Fact or Fiction.
411 Fact or Fiction Movies: Week 57 (12.08.2006)
Ben Moser and myself talk the end of InDigEnt, LiLo, animated movies and Letterman in Week 57 of Movie Fact or Fiction.
411 Fact or Fiction Movies: Week 56 (12.01.2006)
George H. Sirois and Tim O'Sullivan talk Michael Richards, The Simpsons movie, David Arquette, Maggie Gyllenhaal, and both Da Vinci Code and Van Wilder sequels in Week 56 of Movie Fact or Fiction.
411 Movies Roundtable: December 2006 (12.01.2006)
A look back at November and a look ahead at a Joyous December with the 411 Movies Staff.
An Evening With Kevin Smith 2: Evening Harder DVD Review (11.30.2006)
More phallic jokes than you can swing a well proportioned part of the male anatomy at.
411 Fact or Fiction Movies: Week 55 (11.25.2006)
Trevor Snyder and Will Helm talk Happy Feet, Bond, Bobby, The Hobbit and more in Week 55 of Fact or Ficton.
411 Fact or Fiction Movies: Week 54 (11.17.2006)
Bryan Kristopowitz and Al Norton talk Borat lawsuits, Will Ferrell, Happy Feet, Hostel 2 and yes, even the alleged Britney/K-Fed sex tape.
The Great New Wonderful DVD Review (11.11.2006)
If you don't think two scenes with Stephen Colbert are reason enough to rent this movie, there is something wrong with you.
411 Fact or Fiction Movies: Week 53 (11.10.2006)
Tony Farinella and Chad Webb talk Borat, a Sex in the City movie, Jim Carrey's thriller turn, a bloody Bond, Walken as a comedian and more in Week 53 of Movie Fact or Fiction.
full archive


www.41mania.com
Copyright © 2005 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.