Forgotten Favorites 04.02.09: Backlash 2002 - Stone Cold Steve Austin vs. The Undertaker
Posted by Jim Grimm on 04.02.2009
Two guys that embodied Attitude had a lesser-known encounter in Spring '02. With Ric Flair as the guest referee, who will be named number one contender?
Welcome back, wrestling fans. We're getting closer and closer to WrestleMania, and I, for one, am pretty excited. The card isn't exactly what I was hoping for, but regardless, it's WrestleMania. An awesome time to be a wrestling fan indeed.
If you haven't been here before (or if you like reading the same lame paragraph every week), here's my purpose for 411 existence:
The evil master of wrestling history, who rules from his titanic towers of evil, takes great joy in robbing his followers of cherished memories. He has even gone so far as to wave his billion-dollar wand on more than one occasion in an attempt to completely erase particular pockets of time. Well, we, the people, have refused to stand for such injustices, and as a result, I have been called upon to right the wrongs of time.
This week we're going back to 2002 once again to take a look at a match that's happened many, many times. Two guys that headlined several PPVs during the Attitude Era squared off in a semi-main event that's sort of slipped past a lot of fans' (and the WWE's) radar.
So ... who wants great wrestling?
Backlash - April 21, 2002
Special Guest Referee: Ric Flair
Stone Cold Steve Austin vs. The Undertaker
HOW IT WENT DOWN
The entire landscape of the then-WWF changed forever on March 25, 2002. On that night the first draft was held to determine the exclusive rosters of Raw and SmackDown. Ric Flair, a co-owner of the company at the time, represented Raw in the draft selections. And much to the surprise of the wrestling world, Flair's first draft pick was the man who had just bloodied and beat him at WrestleMania, The Undertaker.
The next week on Raw, a pissed-off Deadman interrupted Flair's presentation of the new Undisputed Championship belt to Triple H. Citing his WrestleMania victories over both Flair and HHH, Taker claimed he was deserving of a title shot at the upcoming Backlash PPV. HHH seemed more than willing to oblige with a title shot, and it seemed that was that.
Also later on that same night, Stone Cold Steve Austin returned from a short hiatus to declare that he had signed an exclusive contract with Raw. And just to make sure his new boss understood what kind of an employee he had to deal with, Austin ended the night with a Stone Cold Stunner for Flair.
The Backlash title match plans took a different direction on SmackDown. At the time, the Undisputed Champion wrestled on both Raw and SmackDown. And it was the blue brand who'd gotten the right to challenge the champion at the first PPV of the extension. Vince McMahon wasted no time in declaring Hulk Hogan the number one contender for HHH's title at Backlash.
That didn't sit too well with the Undertaker, and he kicked things off in a foul badass mood on the following Raw. He got in Flair's face and demanded that he be named the number one contender for after Backlash. But that didn't sit too well with Raw's newest superstar, one Stone Cold Steve Austin, who hit the ring and demanded his own title shot. To settle the matter, Flair set up two matches for later that night on Raw: Undertaker vs. Rob Van Dam and Stone Cold vs. Scott Hall. The winners of those respective matches would square off at Backlash to determine the number one contender for Judgment Day.
As you might have guessed, Austin and Undertaker won their Raw matches and were signed to face off at Backlash. The following week on Raw, Ric Flair, fed up with Austin and Taker's defiance, declared that he would be the special guest referee for their match at Backlash. Flair also signed a handicap main event for later that night on Raw, with nWo members Scott Hall and X-Pac teaming up with Undertaker to take on Stone Cold and Bradshaw. Yep, Bradshaw.
And so came the night of Backlash, where two guys who've met many, many times before were ready to go one more time under the bright lights. Who would earn the title shot at Judgment Day?
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
WHY IT SHOULD BE REMEMBERED
Regardless of the quality of the match (which is pure awesomeness), the three participants involved alone warrants this match's memory. You have the Icon of Attitude in Steve Austin, the WrestleMania legend in the Undertaker, and a man many regard as the greatest of all time in Ric Flair. Whenever three of the biggest names in the history of the business get together inside the ring, it's a fairly historical event.
Adding even further magic to this match is the fact that all three men were certifiable legends by the time of Backlash '02. Compare this match to the WWE Title confrontation between Undertaker and Austin at Cold Day In Hell in '97 and you'll see a world of difference. While both men were certainly over at the time of their '97 encounter, neither man was anywhere near the legendary status they'd have five years later. The same can be said for one of the undercard matches at that particular In Your House PPV, where a young Rocky Maivia took on this guy named Mankind. The Austin-Taker and Rock-Mankind matches that took place in May of '97 were nowhere near the level of their '98 and '99 encounters, simply because they hadn't yet achieved the megastar status that they would once the Attitude Era really got rolling.
My point here is that Austin vs. Taker was a big deal in 2002, and the fans knew it. When watching the tape, take notice of the crowd reaction once all three men have entered the ring. Before the match even begins, the audience is surging with electricity. There are "What?" chants, booming "Whoo!"s, and you can only make those out when the crowd isn't just consumed by all-around noise. With so much history between all three guys, particularly the Rattlesnake and the Deadman, the fans knew that they were witnessing something special and that it may have been for the last time. Sadly, as it turns out, it was the last time.
If you were watching at the time or you've studied up on your history, you know all about Austin's infamous departure from WWE not long after his Backlash match with the Undertaker. I've never personally spoken to the Bionic Redneck regarding his "walk-out," but the reasons that surfaced at the time related more to booking problems than health ones. When considering the end of Stone Cold's career, fans will likely first think of his final performance against The Rock at WrestleMania XIX, a match where Austin held his own but was clearly not the Stone Cold of old. This is a shame, considering one year prior Austin was still taking part in weekly, active competition and, while no spring chicken, still delivered quality matches.
Austin's third WrestleMania match against The Rock was a classic but still wasn't the Stone Cold of old
There are a lot of fans who shy away from giving Steve Austin credit as a good worker, which is something I will never understand. He's often written off as a sub-par wrestler who, even in his "prime," was strictly a punch-kick-Stunner brawler. You'll also hear claims that his ring work suffered ever since the SummerSlam '97 incident with Owen Hart and that his ring skills quickly deteriorated. What's often ignored is the fact that Attitude Era matches were punch-kick-finisher for nearly everyone. Once the Attitude started to fade and Austin turned heel, he started having some tremendous matches with guys like Chris Benoit, Chris Jericho, and Kurt Angle, matches that stand among my personal favorites from any era. And then if you fast forward to the twilight of Austin's active competition, you have a match like the Backlash encounter with Undertaker, where Austin was clearly still able to go, and for well over twenty minutes, no less.
And I hate to beat a dead horse (or dead man?) with certain subjects, but based on the reactions from a couple weeks ago, it still stands out: People loved the American Badass. A couple of weeks ago I highlighted a tag match from SmackDown '03 that featured the face version of Biker Taker, but this week's Backlash match showcases the most Badass of all Badassery. Taker was just coming off one hell of a bloody WrestleMania match with the Nature Boy, and he was simply pure evil (or Big Evil, I guess). He was a thinking-man's wrestler who could either take you down to the mat or simply punch your teeth out, whichever he thought best at the time.
Favorite part of this feud? On an edition of Raw prior to Backlash (not sure on the date), The Undertaker -- pushed over the edge by the audience's "What?" after each of his sentences -- told the crowd to "say 'What' again if you sleep with your sister." And they did. And on this night, it was Undertaker-1, Incestuous Wrestling Fans-0.
WHY IT ISN'T REMEMBERED
Ask a fan to name a Stone Cold vs. Undertaker match and what do you think they'll come up with first? SummerSlam '98? Their Buried Alive confrontation at Rock Bottom? I don't mean to suggest that their Backlash encounter has been forgotten by most wrestling fans (avid fans will more than likely remember it), but this match's legacy is nothing compared to some of their other classics. It's not necessarily a good or a bad thing, but it is a bit unfortunate, considering their Backlash match featured action that was just as good, if not better than their other confrontations.
One of the more iconic moments of the Attitude Era
We've also got to take into account the time period in which this match took place. This was shortly after the beginnings of the brand extension and shortly before the name change from the Federation to pure Entertainment. Things were hectic in the soon-to-be Land of the E. The separate rosters we've all gotten used to these days (separate in name, at least) were a fresh new direction at the time, but they still took some time getting used to. Until we got roster-exclusive World Champions, things were a little unstable on both Raw and SmackDown, with wrestlers frequently switching back and forth (Benoit, Guerrero, Jericho, the Un-Americans, etc). Exciting stuff was definitely going on at this time (Austin-Taker, the Angle-Edge feud, Lesnar's rise), but it all got caught up in a trade-crazy, messy start to the brand extension.
WILL IT BE REMEMBERED?
Saying it isn't remembered at all is a bit of a stretch. I haven't seen it on any DVD compilations, but it was a high profile match that was released on a PPV DVD. The number one contender stipulation, PPV setting, and legendary participants are definitely going to make this a standout in any fan's memory. It may not have gotten as much attention as its deserved over the years since, but I have hope that people are still going to be talking about this one for a while. Austin, Undertaker, and Flair are three of the best, and fans are going to want to get their hands on any match involving these three guys.
- -
Feedback will return next week, provided school hasn't bombarded me with stuff that I've forgotten is due. Keep the discussion going and the suggestions coming. To the dude who wants Orton-Edge, be patient, my friend. Its time is coming.
Bullshit, this match sucked. You dumb, boy. Didn't you get the memo?
Posted By: Animal Rites (Guest) on April 02, 2009 at 12:20 AM
I had this DVD back when it came out. I thought that match completely sucked/bored me to death.
Posted By: Anonymous (Guest) on April 02, 2009 at 12:35 AM
Really?
Posted By: Samer Kadi (Registered) on April 02, 2009 at 01:00 AM
Is this a late April Fools Joke?
I remember watching this pay per view at a sports bar with a bunch of friends. This match has stuck out in my mind because it was God-awful. I mean it was Undertaker vs. Sid at WrestleMania 13 level of awful. I'd say that it was so bad it was good, but it's not even that, it was just bad; pathetically bad given the performers involved. I remember talking with my friends about how terrible this match was from the moment it was finished until we were driving home. I don't normally question people's opinions, but if you thought this was a good match, then you've got to check out Al Snow vs. Big Boss Man in the Kennel From Hell Match, you'll love it!
Posted By: John (Guest) on April 02, 2009 at 01:00 AM
this match blowed big time..
summerslam 1998 encounter was better...
Posted By: catsa (Guest) on April 02, 2009 at 01:24 AM
Ummmmmz I dunno what match you guys are thinking about but this was one of the best matches I can remember from growing up.
All you people are haterz
Posted By: Surgeon General (Guest) on April 02, 2009 at 02:08 AM
How in the blue hell was that a bad match?
Posted By: christiansbale (Guest) on April 02, 2009 at 02:32 AM
Its not remembered because the everything about the ending looked TER-RIB-LE
Posted By: Guest#6867 (Guest) on April 02, 2009 at 02:57 AM
Really? I remember this match when I ordered the PPV and was hideously bored throughout the whole thing.
I know this is all opinion but, dude, not one of your better choices...
Posted By: mr_wishart (Guest) on April 02, 2009 at 02:58 AM
I remember this match, awesome stuff. Quite amazing when you consider Taker and Austin had a match a year prior with the face/heel dynamics switched.
My Rated RKO fanboyism is hurting over here, and when that column finally comes ... well ... it will be bloody awesome.
But thanks for the mention!
Posted By: The dude who wants Orton-Edge (Guest) on April 02, 2009 at 03:03 AM
Favorite part of this feud? On an edition of Raw prior to Backlash (not sure on the date), The Undertaker -- pushed over the edge by the audience's "What?" after each of his sentences -- told the crowd to "say 'What' again if you sleep with your sister." And they did. And on this night, it was Undertaker-1, Incestuous Wrestling Fans-0.
awww... just great. i completely forgot about that. and i can't wait for orton/edge as long as your talking about the one from two years ago and that bullshit from vengeance '04.
maybe i misread, and i'm shocked no one has mentioned it yet on the comment board, but this was also thee one real shot the 'e ever had to pull the trigger on austin/hogan. austin was still turning in solid work, and hogan was... well, he was... hogan.
i really enjoyed the angle/hogan angle and it's been rumored that there was supposed to be an austin/guerrero program in the works, but i would have rather have seen this. the build would been impossible to conceive. hey, the match probably would've sucked, but still would've had rock/hogan-style electricity at a fucking judgement day ppv.
Posted By: csonkamaniac (Guest) on April 02, 2009 at 03:35 AM
I like Undi.
I like Austin.
I don't like this match.
Posted By: Maffew (Guest) on April 02, 2009 at 05:28 AM
This match was crap. Being generous it would be kind of 1/2* or 3/4*.
Posted By: Santi (Guest) on April 02, 2009 at 08:06 AM
I've actually TRIED forgetting this one as it was pretty lame. Hell, I'm sure Austin and 'Taker don't even bring it up in conversation.
Posted By: His Bubbliness (Guest) on April 02, 2009 at 09:05 AM
are you serious? this match sucked the big one...plodding, slow, half-assed, overprotected BS from 3 over-the-hill-performers!
Posted By: Mackay (Guest) on April 02, 2009 at 09:43 AM
Undertaker, SCSA, and Flair are all legends, that goes without saying. However...this match was bad...REALLY BAD! not a forgotten favorite. Maybe I missed the article, but maybe consider the epic 10 man tag match from RAW that took place beofre No Way Out 2000 as a forgotten favorite. Or the 8 man tag match from No Way Out of Texas. Sure Savio Vega is no HBK but you could write a whole article on AUSTIN THROWING A TRASH CAN AT BILLY GUNN FROM ACROSS THE RING!
Posted By: Are you High? (Guest) on April 02, 2009 at 10:28 AM
Wasn't a huge fan when it first aired. In fact, the lasting image I had was of Flair's awful red boots clashing with his black pants/ref shirt ensemble (can't see the video at work so I'm praying I'm remembering correctly).
2002 is a much-maligned year for WWE (Reign of Terror, anyone?) but the start of the split, er, brand extenstion was exciting. It added a bit of the intrigue of the Monday Night Wars to a slowly deteriorating product. It's too bad two, nay, three "separate brands" means exactly shit now.
Didn't Bradshaw team with Austin, like, four weeks in a row? I remember seeing that and thinking, "Fuck, put the brands back together if THIS is what the talent elevation is gonna be."
Posted By: neverAcquiesce (Guest) on April 02, 2009 at 10:57 AM
Eh? im a fan of both guys but both were unmotivated at this point & it showed, the match was average at best.
Posted By: jbardo (Guest) on April 02, 2009 at 11:02 AM
To be perfectly honest I don't remember this being a very good match at all, but I do agree that Austin still had a good run against good 'wrestlers' in Benoit, Angle and Benoit (pre-Invasion).
Posted By: TAT (Guest) on April 02, 2009 at 11:02 AM
Favorite part of this feud? On an edition of Raw prior to Backlash (not sure on the date), The Undertaker -- pushed over the edge by the audience's "What?" after each of his sentences -- told the crowd to "say 'What' again if you sleep with your sister." And they did. And on this night, it was Undertaker-1, Incestuous Wrestling Fans-0
Haha, forgot about that, classic.
Posted By: jbardo (Guest) on April 02, 2009 at 11:10 AM
I saw the preview of the match at house show a week before the PPV. 98% of the match was the same including every move and spot except for the ending. I enjoyed the match at house show than the PPV match. I was looking forward to this match and felt disappointed. Maybe I saw it live or the crowd heat was nearly quiet.
Posted By: Guest#6531 (Guest) on April 02, 2009 at 12:37 PM
If memory serves, Austin left because he was asked to job to the relatively green Brock Lesner to build Lesner up for his WWE title run. Austin either refused to job to Lesner outright, or wanted to make the job meaningful by doing it on PPV. I'm not certain which (if either) of those is true or not.
Posted By: Michael L (Guest) on April 02, 2009 at 01:03 PM
How ironic is this! If Austin had defeated Undertaker, he would have gone on to face ....... you guessed it, HULK HOGAN at Judgement Day! You could have had that dream match back in 2002! Shame!!!!!
Posted By: Guest04 (Guest) on April 02, 2009 at 01:22 PM
Late April Fools joke?
This had to be the worst, boring match between these two I had ever seen.
It made the Hogan/Triple H match look good, which wasn't too hot either. Until Hogan won, and that made the match (at least) watchable.
Posted By: fg76 (Guest) on April 02, 2009 at 01:42 PM
This is a joke, right? That match was horrendous. Made even worse by the NATURE BOY WOOO!! taking a lame ref bump.
Yes, gently running into Ric Flair in 2002 caused him to be knocked out for two minutes. Why didn't the Undertaker just do that at WrestleMania X8 instead of wrestling him for 20 minutes? Geez.
Posted By: ODog (Guest) on April 02, 2009 at 02:06 PM
Wow, this is one of the few matches I flat out DESPISED! Gotta disagree here.
Posted By: AJP (Guest) on April 02, 2009 at 06:44 PM
I'm going to END the 411mania comments section on the entire site!!!
I'll be contacting the head of this site tonight.
Posted By: Ender (Guest) on April 02, 2009 at 06:57 PM
While their other matches may be better, I don't think this is that bad a match. Although I do agree that the Ric Flair as a bad special referee does hinder it (Flair knocked out twice?)
Posted By: JLAJRC (Guest) on April 02, 2009 at 07:24 PM
Has to be a joke. If you think this match was good wrestling, then everything you know about wrestling is completely backwards.
Posted By: Guest#8387 (Guest) on April 02, 2009 at 08:45 PM
'And I hate to beat a dead horse (or dead man?) with certain subjects, but based on the reactions from a couple weeks ago, it still stands out: People loved the American Badass'.
WHAT????? All i can remember from that era is the iwc hating on the entire gimmick. Every week was 'bring back zombie taker please uncle vince!' am i the only one who remembers this???? Surely Not????
Posted By: Luke81 (Guest) on April 03, 2009 at 06:50 AM
Well I'll go against the norm, I didn't think this was great but I did think it was solid. Both guys worked hard...I just felt at the time that both guys also had little left. Taker, at least, has proved me very wrong since.
Posted By: Ryushinku (Guest) on April 03, 2009 at 04:10 PM
How bout Shelton Benjamin vs. Chris Jericho at Backlash 2005. That was a classic.
Posted By: Guest (Guest) on April 04, 2009 at 04:48 PM
Copyright � 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.