www.411mania.com
|  News |  Columns |  TV Reports |  Video Reviews |  Title History |  Hall of Fame |  News Report |  The Dunn List |
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// Star Wars Episode I Brings In $1.1 Million in Midnight Showings
MUSIC
// First Official Pics of Beyonce and Jay-Z With Blue Ivy Posted
WRESTLING
// Impact Wrestling Rating
POLITICS
// Obama Showing Strongest Poll Numbers In Months
MMA
// Click Here To Join 411’s LIVE XFC 16: High Stakes Coverage
GAMES
// Star Trek Sequel Game in the Works


 HOT TOPICS
//  CM Punk
//  John Cena
//  Triple H
//  Hulk Hogan
//  Randy Orton
//  Christian
SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds





Follow 411mania on Twitter!




Add 411 On Facebook
 



 
 411mania » Wrestling » Columns



Advertisement
The Wrestling Doctor 04.07.09: The WWE After Wrestlemania XXV
Posted by W.S. Thomason on 04.07.2009



THE WRESTLING DOCTOR



The Undertaker and Shawn Michaels gave a classic performance at Wrestlemania XXV. Period. End of story. The match was an excellent display of in-ring storytelling, and will become a DVD staple and a point-of-reference in the coming years. Jim Ross has already declared it to be the best Wrestlemania match he has ever called, which covers a lot of serious territory.

And who did not love the over-produced symbolism of the entrances? Salvation vs. death, the continual vs. inevitable judgment, ascension vs. descension. Classic themes.

The match itself was a triumph for the participants, the fans, and the event. It did, however, brightly expose one of the WWE's current major weaknesses: the inability to conceive, plan, and execute a compelling story in the ring.

Whether you call it professional wrestling or sports entertainment, story telling is the nucleus of the product we all enjoy. Wrestler A and Wrestler B must have a reason why we would like to see them settle their differences in the ring. Once in the ring, a narrative needs to unfold that will pull the audience in and make them forget the realistic confines of what they are actually watching. Nobody wins unless the fans are sincerely sucked into the emotion of the match, despite their knowledge that the outcome is predetermined. Any wrestling fan can tell you of big matches where they rooted for one participant, clinched their teeth, and wiped the sweat from their palms in the exact same way they root for a football or baseball team during a big game. The feeling of investment on the part of the fans is what drives wrestling, and story telling is how that feeling is created.

Undertaker and Michaels know how to tell a story in the ring and create that sense of investment. There were not many potential sleepers on this year's Wrestlemania; before the show most people would have predicted that UT-HBK would be the match of the night. Most people would also have predicted that the Undertaker would win. Despite this predictability, the crowd was still chanting "This is awesome", which I believe may be a Wrestlemania first. The match created a sense of investment, and the audience loved it.

The quality of the UT-HBK match made the other weaknesses of the card brightly shine. First, the marquee WWE Title match between Triple H and Randy Orton did not deliver on its promise of violent reprisal. The Game did worse things to Ric Flair in 2005 than he did to the man who has RKOd and DDTd his wife over the last month. Are we supposed to believe that the same Hunter who broke into Orton's house would wrestle the type of match he did on Sunday night? The vengeance demanded by the story arc was not realized in Triple H's victory. The feud is by no means over, but the first payoff has cost the program a lot of momentum. Backlash will most likely feature Triple H / Vince / Shane vs. Orton / DiBiase / Rhodes, and Judgment Day will have a one-on-one stipulation rematch between HHH and RKO. This scenario could have been easily predicated before the big event. The build to Triple H-Orton was solid, but the payoff did not round out this critical chapter of the story the WWE is trying to tell.

The John Cena-Edge-Big Show World Title triple-threat was a primary draw for few viewers, and it delivered on its prospect of mediocrity. The angle was silly and rushed, and the story line never clicked. The WWE had two months to figure out what to do with Cena when Batista went down, and they failed to deliver.

The weaknesses with the two major title storylines stood out at Wrestlemania XXV because Undertaker-Michaels showed the fans what a good story is: two wrestlers fighting for a reason – in this case, to simply see who is the better man on the grandest stage of them all – in a match that delivers drama, intensity, and a result that ends the narrative in a satisfying way. Only the Hardys matchup came close to rivaling what UT and Michaels delivered.

A even bigger problem for the WWE is that the Undertaker is 47 and Shawn Michaels is 43. They had the match of the night – maybe even the WWE match of the year – but such an accolade should be going to younger talent instead of two veterans who probably have less than five years left. UT and HBK have earned every inch of their spot, but at this stage in their careers neither man should be the ones drawing the "This is awesome" chant if the WWE is a truly healthy company. Somebody has to be in the wings to take their place.

Wrestlemania X is seen as watershed event for the WWE, where new talent in their late twenties and early thirties – Bret Hart, Michaels, Owen Hart, Razor Ramon – broke out in a major way and established the direction of the company for the next three years. A similar situation evolved between Wrestlemanias XIII and XIV, when Steve Austin (then 32 / 33), The Rock (who could not rent a car without an extra deposit), Triple H, and a reinvented Undertaker set the tone for the Attitude Era. Wrestlemania XXI saw John Cena, Batista, Randy Orton, and Edge prove themselves as break out stars worthy of the top tier. But during the last four "showcases of the immortals", no new talent has truly emerged as a real name for the future. Sorry, C.M. Punk marks. No one really believed that Bobby Lashley was going to go any further than he did two years ago. Mr. Kennedy is the only fresh face who may have had a real shot, but his door has likely closed.

The lack of territories and the sterile corporate nature of the WWE developmental system are largely to blame for the new generation's inability to deliver. Even with Dusty Rhodes running FCW, the young bloods coming out of Florida do not know how to put together a story in the ring – and the WWE does not seem to care. UT-Michaels got a huge reaction last night, but the WWE seems to be more focused on video packages and skits than consistently delivering a high quality wrestling product at big events.

The saddest part of this whole thing is that the WWE has the best teachers in the world – guys like the Undertaker and Michaels – to show the new talent how to bring it to a big event. The WWE needs to reevaluate their internal training practices, and maybe establish a mentor system, if they want to be prepared to fill the gigantic holes in their roster that will open when guys like Taker, Michaels, and Triple H retire. The attitudes of the new talent may be poor and they deserve a lot of blame, but the WWE can do a lot to change those young mind sets if they take the right approach.

Meanwhile, the tag team title match was bumped for a last-minute performance by an irrelevant Kid Rock, in a move that clearly illustrates how out of touch the WWE is with their audience and their product. An AC/DC two song performance of "Rock ‘n' Roll Train" and "Shot to Thrill" would have made sense considering the promotional tie-in, but The Devil Without A Cause only served to fill the "Hey, look what celebrity we got" slot that Vince McMahon believes is essential for his signature event. The stillness in Reliant Stadium that Undertaker-Michaels broke down was disconcerting for a Wrestlemania, and should have sent a much stronger message to the back than any "This is awesome" chant.

I do not know where the WWE goes from here. They are entering an era where their product is exceptionally stale – no, downright boring – and they need to find a way to reinvigorate the marketplace as they did in 1997-1998. The WWE currently lacks the incentive they had during those years provided by looming bankruptcy, but the reality is that movies where John Cena rescues his wife, McMahon family tension, Triple H title reigns, and seventh-grade slumber party innuendo are not going to sustain long-term growth. The best match of the night at the biggest show of the year should not be between two veterans who probably will not be at Wrestlemania XXX, but it was. No disrespect to the veterans – but there needs to be some young blood snapping at their heels. Young talent must step up if the company is stay strong, but no fresh talent on the roster even came close. No stronger indictment of the WWE's current state can be found.

One day short of writing this column for a year, changes in life have dictated that I retire The Wrestling Doctor. It has been a great experience writing for you all and exchanging ideas – even those responses that were only Epic Fails and RVD! RVD! RVD! I want to thank Ashish and Larry Csonka for giving me the chance to do this most every week for the last year. 411mania is a great site, and the people who run it do more to keep it going than anyone can ever conceive. There are some great columnists with excellent ideas and interesting perspectives putting a lot into their work each and every week. Generating quality ideas every seven days is not an easy task – and these guys write for free. Lastly, thanks to everyone who visited the doctor's office over the last year. Keep on the road, and maybe one day wrestling will turn its head around. Now I've got to go sterilize this space so they can give it to someone else.


Post Comment (40)  |  Email W.S. Thomason  |  View W.S. Thomason's 411 Profile

  Send To Friend  |    Stumble It!  |    Digg It!  | 



Please add your comment below.
If you are registered, you can login and post under your registered name. If not, you can post as a guest or register.

* Please note that 411 moderates all comments. Your comment will show up on the site after it has been approved by an editor.
 
Name : 
Comment : 
Remaining Characters : 
2800
 

Comments (40)

 
RVD! RVD! RVD!

Epic Fail!


Posted By: .. (Guest)  on April 06, 2009 at 10:57 PM

 
 
"The reality is that movies where John Cena rescues his wife, McMahon family tension, Triple H title reigns, and seventh-grade slumber party innuendo are not going to sustain long-term growth."

Quoted for truth.


Posted By: Nick M. (Guest)  on April 06, 2009 at 10:58 PM

 
 
Damnit, now I have to find a new mark doctor to get my scrips. Seriously though, thanks for all of your work Scott, take care.

Posted By: The King of 411~! (Registered)  on April 06, 2009 at 11:01 PM

 
 
Very good article, we need more of you and less of Wacky Wrestling Theories

Posted By: K.O.W. (Guest)  on April 06, 2009 at 11:18 PM

 
 
another one bites the dust

Posted By: freddie mercury (Guest)  on April 06, 2009 at 11:46 PM

 
 
thanks Thomason for everything.. really good work for a year.

i wish you well for your future endeavors.


Posted By: Sivpac (Guest)  on April 06, 2009 at 11:49 PM

 
 
great read. alot of valid points all the way around.

Posted By: Chulahoma (Guest)  on April 06, 2009 at 11:52 PM

 
 
Good column. One problem Undertaker is 44.

Posted By: Rich (Guest)  on April 07, 2009 at 12:18 AM

 
 
i thought HBK and Taker were the same age? Aren't both born in 65?

Posted By: Guest#9565 (Guest)  on April 07, 2009 at 12:40 AM

 
 
Great article, and the first of yours ive read.

Now I have to go back and read the rest :)

All the best in future endeavors


Posted By: Blah 09 (Guest)  on April 07, 2009 at 12:58 AM

 
 
If I beat Triple H people would be talking about WM25 alot differently.

Posted By: Randy Orton (Guest)  on April 07, 2009 at 05:22 AM

 
 
I started a "this is awesome" chant at last year's Wrestlemania during the MITB that was loud and went through most of the stadium, but it didn't come across on TV...

Posted By: Martin (Guest)  on April 07, 2009 at 09:54 AM

 
 
A nice read. thanks

Posted By: RVD's Epic Fail (Guest)  on April 07, 2009 at 09:55 AM

 
 
Damn, this is the last one!!

EPIC FAIL!!

Have fun man, thanks for the columns..


Posted By: Ant-LOX (Guest)  on April 07, 2009 at 09:56 AM

 
 
They dont give the young guys chance that is what is wrong. Paul London could have been a major star but they didn't persevere with him. Dont give me he had his chance and he had behavioural problems. Look at Orton! He's had chance after chance despite trashing hotel rooms, shitting in bags and just being a cunt basically. Swagger could be the future although Vince put a temporary stop to that as he didn't like his match against Finlay. I really wish I had Vince's power..........I havent liked a Triple H match in years and by the sound of it from Raw, most of the crowd agree. They need to get behind guys like Swagger, Christian, Punk and give us a reason to care about them plus give them the time. Has anyone seen any of Punk's matches before WWE? Given the right opponent and time he could have a match like Taker/Michaels did! Triple H can't do that and it is time the WWE realised it and used him to put younger more able wrestlers over.

Posted By: DVR (Guest)  on April 07, 2009 at 10:34 AM

 
 
One more column [clap,clap clapclapclap] one more column

Posted By: M-squared (Guest)  on April 07, 2009 at 10:45 AM

 
 
Spot on. WWE is so stale right now that it is indeed downright boring. The storylines insult your intelligence and don't even follow through and they have no clue how to build anyone.

Orton could have been built, infact he WAS until Triple Burial cut him off at the knees for his own selfish prick attitude. Punk was being built when he won MITB (even if it was poorly done for a face) but then they chose to make him look like a weak champion.

WWE would be in the shit if 5 or so people dropped to injury. I dread to think where we'll be in the future at this rate.

Wrestlemania 25 was a shit show for any Wrestlemania, nevermind the 25th. And don't even get me started on Raw, Smackdown and ECW. It's a sad state of affairs.


Posted By: MFKR78 (Guest)  on April 07, 2009 at 10:47 AM

 
 
I think the WWE HAS the young talent available on their roster right now, they just need to start grooming them and have the proper storylines, etc. Guys like John Morrison, CM Punk, R-Truth, Shelton, MVP, etc...

Posted By: King Tony (Guest)  on April 07, 2009 at 11:20 AM

 
 
Taker is 44, you moron

Posted By: Alcoholic (Guest)  on April 07, 2009 at 11:29 AM

 
 
The staff at 411mania.com would like to wish W.S. Thomason all the best in his future endeavors.

Posted By: Not Larry (Guest)  on April 07, 2009 at 11:39 AM

 
 
WrestleMania should be about some young new faces stepping up and proving that they are the future of the business. 21 is a great example with Batista, Edge, Cena and Orton really showing that they can bring it.

But this years? Cena winning again (I'm not a Cena hater, I'm a fan but even I'm getting bored), and HHH burying Orton. We need to see new main-eventers being born - Morrison, Miz, CM Punk, MVP, Shelton etc.

Overall this year's Wrestlemania was like 18. Rubbish Main-Event, and the show saved by a epic show-stealer (Hogan-Rock/Taker-HBK) and some brutal action (Taker-Flair/MITB/Hardy-Hardy). 18 did lead to the freshness of Angle-Lesnar and the awesome Wrestlemania 19 so here's hoping that WWE realise that they need to start giving the young guys more time.


Posted By: AH (Guest)  on April 07, 2009 at 11:49 AM

 
 
Shawn vs Taker was an excellent match but when you compare it to Austin vs Hart at WM XIII for example you see where it falls short in terms of what a 5-star wrestlemania match is and what it should do and that is to elevate new talent.
Instead the spotlight was given to two vets who didn't even bother showing up on raw the next night while all the younger guys were crammed together in the clusterfuck known as mitb.

The only one why got a decent rub at Wrestlemania was Matt Hardy and he's been around for 13 years.


Posted By: DrSmooth (Guest)  on April 07, 2009 at 11:54 AM

 
 
Shame that's the final column, it's always an excellent read. Good luck with your future endeavours.

Posted By: Alec (Guest)  on April 07, 2009 at 12:13 PM

 
 
"Very good article, we need more of you and less of Wacky Wrestling Theories

Posted By: K.O.W. (Guest) on April 06, 2009 at 11:18 PM"

------

This, 100%.


Posted By: AngryTas (Guest)  on April 07, 2009 at 12:26 PM

 
 
A problem with being the only major wrestling promotion is that the WWE can tell themselves that the current ratings are because of a downswing in the popularity of wrestling. Since Vince seems to make heads roll, it reinforces the yes man syndrome. While Heyman is not the infallible genius, he was a creative dissenting voice who got some results. But he was fired and won't be brought back as long as Vince has a say. So they don't innovate and push themselves to improve, though the 5 year ratings trend should encourage it.

I wonder how much of Smackdown's ratings are because of the network they are on and how much is because it clearly is the B show along with the stale product it offers? Meanwhile Raw is overloaded with stars that they don't have enough time and writing talent to properly push.

Internal attitudes are hurting the product. Now, with MMA drawing away potential future fans, Youtube and torrents an alternative for those underwhelmed by PPVs, WWE is losing business it can't even count.


Posted By: Guest#9187 (Guest)  on April 07, 2009 at 01:37 PM

 
 
The E needs to be looking at Punk, Morrison, Benjamin because they are all near or similar to what HBK and (althought he isn't in the company anymore but he can tell a story in the ring) Angle. They have the potential, athletism and bags more but they need to be used better, they need to get near the torch so when they are ready to carry the torch from guys like Taker and HBK they can do what those 2 did on Sunday and pull one out for the ages. If the E doesn't use the next year or so to do this then where will that leave them but the other question is, will TNA capialize on what the E have ignored on?

Posted By: The Joms (Guest)  on April 07, 2009 at 02:04 PM

 
 
thanks for all the great columns man. good luck.

Posted By: db (Guest)  on April 07, 2009 at 02:39 PM

 
 
What you people fail to realize is that I do everything for the money! I don't care if Cena can wrestle or not, he brings the kiddies to my overpriced merchandise table, and that's how I like it! The Attitude Era worked because overall wrestling ratings were off the scale, because all those kiddies whom I sold the Hulk Rules and Diesel Power t-shirts too followed the NWO, and I in my genius stole the other new following started by ECW and Paul Heyman, and took that with Austin, DX, Foley, and the Rock and ran with that ball. Now that I killed WCW, I'm going back to the kids again to start the next boom. Look at the 80's? Wrestling goes in cycles, and as much as you all hate WWE PG, Cena, Mysterio, etc., I am laughing all the way to the bank and setting up for the next boom.

Posted By: Vincent Kennedy McMahon (Guest)  on April 07, 2009 at 04:04 PM

 
 
by the way, the undertaker just turned 44 march 24...he is not 47, check out wikipedia on mark calaway. and im pretty sure shawn is the same age.

Posted By: terry w (Guest)  on April 07, 2009 at 04:50 PM

 
 
I don't comment on others' columns often, but with this being your last one, I did want to come out and say that I've loved reading your work over the last year. Thanks for everything and all my best to you.

Posted By: Mike Chin (Registered)  on April 07, 2009 at 05:02 PM

 
 
Has anyone seen any of Punk's matches before WWE? Given the right opponent and time he could have a match like Taker/Michaels did!

^lol, alright...that pussy fake "stiff" style shit automatically puts CM Punk up there with 'Taker and HBK now...whatever


Posted By: CMsuck (Guest)  on April 07, 2009 at 05:51 PM

 
 
So... some people here have way too much time on the internet. I mean, c'mon, you know UT's age right off the bat?

Posted By: RobboCop (Guest)  on April 07, 2009 at 05:51 PM

 
 
I always thought the death of WCW and ECW was the death of wrestling as we know it and now 8 years later that looks to be true. Face it, wrestling peaked at WM 17 and hasn't come close since. There is no competition. So Vince can be lazy as hell now. It's why we have nonsense on every show like Cole and King hyping Cena's latest movie that bombed. Wrestlemania should have had UT-HBK on last. Or even better it could have been a title match to raise the stakes even higher. Cena's act has been old for years. In my opinion HHH has no business going over anyone let alone being the champion. Orton and Edge are capable of carrying the company for the next decade but the WWE has a hard on for veterans. Look no further than this year's "biggest event" to show how stale the product is.

Posted By: JM (Guest)  on April 07, 2009 at 08:00 PM

 
 
Please watch any vintage WWF card from the 80s or 90s. The fact of the matter is, except for honorable exceptions like Bret Hart, Santana etc, ALL the wrestlers today are way, way better than the over-sized lumbering freaks that used to be pushed back in the day. No new stars coming up? True.
But (for instance) the Colons and Miz/Morrison occupy almost exactly the same space as the Hart Foundation and the Rockers back in the day. :)


Posted By: Guest#9265 (Guest)  on April 08, 2009 at 02:08 AM

 
 
WHAT?!

First the Wacky Wrestling Theory, and now this?? I fear that soon this site will be a Levittown-esque landscape of identical but top ten lists and humorless fantasy booking, far as the eye can see... and the irony of how that would mirror the repetition in today's wrestling industry doesn't escape me.

Good luck with everything, Doc, and thanks for the ideas. Hope to be reading more of them someday...


Posted By: KanyonKreist (Registered)  on April 08, 2009 at 02:56 AM

 
 
Excellent article

Posted By: Dwayne (Guest)  on April 08, 2009 at 04:26 AM

 
 
Has anyone seen any of Punk's matches before WWE? Given the right opponent and time he could have a match like Taker/Michaels did!

^lol, alright...that pussy fake "stiff" style shit automatically puts CM Punk up there with 'Taker and HBK now...whatever

Posted By: CMsuck (Guest) on April 07, 2009 at 05:51 PM

Ummmmm....what do you mean by pussy fake stiff shit? Isn't that what wrestling is about? Making it look as real as possible?
My point was that CM Punk, if given the time and right opponent, lets say Shawn Michaels, could have as good a match if not better than Michaels and taker did at WM.


Posted By: Guest#8886 (Guest)  on April 08, 2009 at 09:07 AM

 
 
Sad to see you go.

I sort of agree that there should be break out stars but I think if the veterans don't deliver at least a match of the night contender then what are they doing on the roster? Flair for years was just a washed up guy, ruining his legacy until they gave him the retirement angle. I'm glad Michaels and Taker are still capable of earning their place on the card with talent rather than reputation


Posted By: Jonberg (Guest)  on April 08, 2009 at 11:58 AM

 
 
What you people fail to realize is that I do everything for the money! I don't care if Cena can wrestle or not, he brings the kiddies to my overpriced merchandise table, and that's how I like it! The Attitude Era worked because overall wrestling ratings were off the scale, because all those kiddies whom I sold the Hulk Rules and Diesel Power t-shirts too followed the NWO, and I in my genius stole the other new following started by ECW and Paul Heyman, and took that with Austin, DX, Foley, and the Rock and ran with that ball. Now that I killed WCW, I'm going back to the kids again to start the next boom. Look at the 80's? Wrestling goes in cycles, and as much as you all hate WWE PG, Cena, Mysterio, etc., I am laughing all the way to the bank and setting up for the next boom.

Posted By: Vincent Kennedy McMahon (Guest) on April 07, 2009 at 04:04 PM

Ya right. Vince doesn't have long term plans like that just like he doesn't have long term booking plans anymore. Need proof?? What was the feud of the year after Wrestlemania last year???? Jericho/HBK. One with lots of heat that they controlled with solid competitors that could have led into a huge payoff at Wrestlemania with good long term booking and instead had a payoff match at...hell I don't even remember what ppv(too damn many that come off as meaningless) in a ladder match. Seriously, the numbers are there, WWE is still top dog but is nothing compared to what they used to be. On top of that, the ratings are already off to a bad start this year compared to last, Wrestlemania, while having a huge gate, probably dropped AGAIN in buyrates....you see where I'm going here???

Oh, wait, they brought back Batista on Raw....there's that up and coming young star they need....except he's almost 40 and has been played out...look out here comes the boom again!!!


Posted By: JadedWWFfan (Guest)  on April 08, 2009 at 01:59 PM

 
 
Here, here. It is pathetic that UT vs. Michaels was the run away match on the card.

One of the reasons that match was so good is the now non-existant brand extension. For the majority of the past five years these two have been on different brands so when they finally fought again it meant something. But now and especially with the upcoming Superstars (which they are hyping as an inter-brand showdown) we just have everyone jumping everywhere else.

I realize they lose some money in the short-run but I think keeping three strong brands is how the 'E is going to keep their product fresh and long-term buyrates high.Pretty soon they'll be out of most of their compelling match-ups.

Oh wait a second they already are...


Posted By: Save.Us_Y2J (Guest)  on April 08, 2009 at 10:59 PM

 


www.41mania.com
Copyright � 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.