www.411mania.com
|  News |  Columns |  TV Reports |  Video Reviews |  Title History |  Hall of Fame |  News Report |  The Dunn List |
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// Star Wars Episode I Brings In $1.1 Million in Midnight Showings
MUSIC
// First Official Pics of Beyonce and Jay-Z With Blue Ivy Posted
WRESTLING
// Impact Wrestling Rating
POLITICS
// Obama Showing Strongest Poll Numbers In Months
MMA
// Click Here To Join 411’s LIVE XFC 16: High Stakes Coverage
GAMES
// Star Trek Sequel Game in the Works


 HOT TOPICS
//  CM Punk
//  John Cena
//  Triple H
//  Hulk Hogan
//  Randy Orton
//  Christian
SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds





Follow 411mania on Twitter!




Add 411 On Facebook
 



 
 411mania » Wrestling » Columns



Advertisement
Five-Star Conversation 07.07.09: Let's Call The Brand Split Off...Or Shall We?
Posted by Geoff Eubanks on 07.07.2009



DID YOU KNOW? Mark Henry has a squat thrust of 1,000 pounds; Santina had a squat thrust of about 5 inches.



RAW & SMACKDOWN! THOUGHTS

I am not intentionally ripping off Larry's old school Raw liners (although one more 4am text message about golf that wakes me up on a work day, and we'll see...), but I jotted down some notes during last week's WWE programming and just want to share them. (I still have yet to see the retooled ECW. Hulu.com, here I come! Check out ECW & SD! there, folks…the ratings count!)

Maryse is such a bitch, if she were 40 years older, had three divorces and twice as many facelifts/titjobs, she would qualify for Bravo's "Real Housewives of Montreal".

Maryse: Michel, ferme le bouche. For the uninitiated, she told Michael Cole to shut up on live television without him even realizing it. Glorious.

Mickie James is the Rachael Ray of WWE.

With all the hoohah over the DVD release of "12 Rounds", I'm reminded that the villain of the film was one of the principles in the original, British version of "Queer As Folk". If he was half as committed to selling his "12 Rounds" character as he was to convincing the QAF audience that he was really cornholing young Charlie Hunnam, the film might have been better. I'm just saying.



I'm already a hell of a lot more interested in heel CM Punk than his babyface counterpart…!

Yet again, do the crickets in attendance pop for Ricky Ortiz.

Jesse's imitation of Spencer from "The Hills" is hilarious, although still nowhere near as obnoxious.

I wonder if Rey Mysterio's disgusting chin pubes ever get stuck in the Velcro of his mask's chin-strap?

In the new child-friendly "WWE Universe", how does an unrepentant heel like Michelle McCool get to wear gear adorned in crosses?

With Matt Hardy and Kane now back on the same roster as their siblings, we can now start the countdown to the return of THE HARDYS versus THE BROTHERS OF DESTRUCTION.

Vince's influence upon SD! General Manager Teddy Long (which seems to imply that, yes, Vince is concerned, though not panicking about Friday's ratings), that Long will soon be turning all-out heel.

The only thing wrong with Punk's eyes are those Samsonites he's lugging around underneath them.

Jeff Hardy over-selling his own feigned eye injury was the best acting he's ever done. I laughed my ass off.



FUCK THE BRAND SPLIT!



How many times have we seen that typed over the last couple years by both columnists and commenters alike here at 411mania.com? Hell, not to toot my own horn, and not that I was leading any charge or anything, but I was saying that long before even Larry took up the torch with a louder voice back when we were the team analyzing North American professional wrestling in The R's. I had thrown my hands in the air by the time he got fed up. I've never necessarily favored patience as a virtue…that, and I think he had more faith and allowed for a bit more fudging than did I.

Notwithstanding, I've allowed myself since to become giddy as little schoolgirl when the annual Draft would roll around, because the notion of fresh rosters and of the existing possibility that, should WWE really commit and play smart, it was allowing itself a certain "anything goes" type of atmosphere on all brands under its umbrella where a truly clever Creative team that had truly thought about the moves it was instigating could have some truly fun, visceral, immediate as well as intelligent, long-standing effects. Nope, not a lick of patience, but a wealth of blind faith that couldn't be contained in Vickie Guerrero's granny panties (does anyone else miss her like I do? I swear, I was in the grocery store yesterday, heard a pushy woman perfunctorily say, "ExCUSE me," and I almost marked out right there!).

Ending the Split now makes less sense than it used to a couple years ago, and I'll tell you why. ECW has just seen its first "graduating class", so to speak, of ‘now-ready for prime time players' by nudging some chicks out of the nest, Jack Swagger and Evan Bourne to Raw and THE HART DYNASTY: Tyson Kydd & David Hart Smith with Natalya to SmackDown!. This is incredibly significant because it displays that the concept of the televised developmental is working. Now, I'll be honest, at this point, I have more faith in Swagger and Bourne succeeding initially on their own on Raw, because they appear to be to me more polished and dynamic as solo acts; plus, their placement on Mondays potentially serves them well, too, especially Swagger, whose size and braggadocios demeanor will be a nice fit (I'm a little more concerned about Bourne, who is relatively small, despite being a remarkable firecracker, plus, his shaky promo "skills" stand to undermine him, but let's keep our fingers crossed in his regard!).

However, that's what stands THD in such good stead. They are still relatively green (I mean the men…Natalya is already one of the most accomplished female grapplers in the entire company and I'd bet money she could take down a few men), but they are a unit with heritage, flash and a great look. By the way, have you noticed the staggering litany of solid performers Friday night boasts these days? Edge, Jeff and (now) Matt Hardy, Chris Jericho (the best physical storyteller in the business), John Morrison, Rey Mysterio, CM Punk, The Undertaker…plus, we now have Finlay on hand to tutor some of the greener/less-established (though capable and promising) acts, such as Charlie Haas, Jesse, Mike Knox, R-Truth and Dolph Ziggler. Hell, who knows, Curt Hawkins and Ricky Ortiz might even end up impressing us once in awhile. Ah, there goes that blind faith, although remember the article I wrote a couple months ago on the importance of young recruits benefiting best from having a sort of mentorship the higher they go up the ladder, having someone up the ladder there to teach them the finer points of rising the ladder as they go? This could be one big Friday night group hug to that end, if all goes well. Metaphorically speaking, obviously.

Speaking of Finlay, it strikes me that the trading of William Regal from Raw to SmackDown! and that of Finlay from ECW to SmackDown! was arbitrary, aside from the fact that it is McMahonagement's apparent wish to establish new developmental graduate and Irish-born Sheamus aside and apart from Finlay, a good idea. However, it strikes me that both exceptional veterans hailing from The UK have a lot to teach these rookies, and Finlay basically tagged in Regal for this round, and I am fine with that. They weren't doing dick with Regal on Mondays since he dropped The ICT to Punk, he may as well go where he may be most useful; Finlay's already proven himself to be valuable in either denomination and can always go in the ring, so he's an interchangeable fixture good to go wherever.

Aside from being the rookie step-to program, ECW also has the possible benefit of allowing stalled talent a place to go to recharge and reinvigorate his/her performance/perception (which is why I think we see Vladimir Kozlov and, now, Goldust, on Tuesday, although the latter performer could simply be in a place where McMahonagement is scratching its head with respect to how to utilize a character at its best when it's edgy…just ask Scott Hall).

The question is, do you buy the new (5SC-predicted) face Mark Henry? Sure, he made a splash (figuratively and literally) by pinning The WWEC Randy Orton (by the way, could someone please get a new television for Batista…? He seems to have found his foot inside of it…), but is Chubbuh (as I like to call him) simply using his ample hinder to keep a top spot warm for Big Dave? Or are we really seeing the birth of a new top level face on the flagship show? If The Henry Experiment goes well and fans actually buy him, I think we'd have to suggest a new day might be dawning for WWE, and that, not only is the current brand lit model working, emphasis being on ECW, that McMahonagement has finally found its niche in marketing to kids, who are all likely too young to recall the injuries that kept him sidelined the better part of his multi-million dollar, decade-long contract, for having fathered a hand with a woman so old her cell phone has a rotary dial or for being tied down by Goldust's ex-wife and BEER MONEY's former manager and tortured with gerbils and vibrators; rather, all they see is a big, drippy teddy bear. It could work. Hell, look at THE BUSHWACKERS.

So, to that end, I'm a bit reticent to mess with ECW in this plan to deep-six the brand split, however, how exactly do we have a separate roster for Tuesday nights without making it obvious to all that it is what it has apparently become, implied success rate aside? Wouldn't noobs be looked upon with even greater scrutiny? Worse, yet, wouldn't a Monday or Friday night roster member not a Finlay or Regal be viewed as a public demotion? This is what I mean about there being a greater difficulty at work in attempting to end the split now.

Finally, with respect to the switches instigated by Trump coughthatIcalledcough where the ladies are concerned, emphasis has undoubtedly been switched to Monday nights. The Monday night Divas roster now has:

Alicia Fox, an up-&-comer if she can continue to improve at her current rate,

Jillian Hall, a solid hand who doesn't get her true due because her gimmick overshadows her talent, especially when she's only used to make Barbie dolls look better than they really are,

Mickie James, one of the best all-around women ever to hold gold,

Kelly Kelly, who showed promise as she really improved quickly, though has since stalled, however still is the hottest Diva under the WWE umbrella,

Gail Kim, stepping up in the trade and giving Mondays tone with her fantastic ability,

Maryse, not the best wrestler in the bunch, but is improving and has such a solid grasp of her own evolving brand of personal bitch psychology that I really look forward to cheering her matches, as opposed to cringing in apprehension when she came to the ring,

Beth Phoenix, the best woman in The Divas Division, period, and,

Rosa Mendes, who has looked okay thus far, although really hasn't had much opportunity to step out of Beth's shadow yet (as is the case with Fox in McCool's respect).

That's a decent roster, all basically capable of filling the five minutes they get a week to put on some fun and entertaining matches.

However, The Women's Division on Fridays has been left quite anemic as a consequence:

Layla, sells well and has a solid grasp of heel psychology, in ring and out, but just doesn't dish it out well,

Maria, cute and fun, but just not meant to wrestle,

Michelle McCool, who I like a lot more in the ring than most, apparently, despite her clumsy promos,

Melina, who I like much better as a spiteful, Catch U Next Tuesday heel bitch, but her face pops cannot be denied and is a better wrestler than I've given her credit for being here in the past,

Eve Torres, just…shudder. On all fronts. We're losing Lillian Garcia, but we're stuck with Skele-Torres, and

Natalya, who is so adept at real wrestling she could take the entire Women's Division on at once.

It's a shame Katie Lea Burchill is stuck over on ECW with her capable, but, calling a spade a spade, go-nowhere brother, because we could use her on Friday nights now.

So maybe there is a call for ending the Brand Split. There's an undercard to consider, even if McMahonagement seems content to let ECW build its new stars, it takes time to properly groom new talent for the long haul and there are a lot of performers already currently employed by WWE who could stand some air time…and yet we hear from WWE that a current "lack of roster depth" prevents us from having a proper tag division. As any fan of THE KILLER BEES or THE ORIENT EXPRESS can tell you, isn't that what we historically do with talented, although not necessarily upwardly mobile performers under Vince's employ?

The basic catalyst for this article is my old pal thegunisgood, who was the person who opened my eyes to the absolute fact that not everyone on your roster is going to be a champion, a bankable star or even warmly remembered by fans in twenty years, but, chin up, young bucks, for those who actually do make it to WWE, especially in today's claustrophobic climate where even televised (forget high-paying) positions in the North-American professional wrestling industry are concerned, all needn't be lost. If I'm seeing thegun's vision through my eyes, there could be some definite benefits to ending the brand split along these lines.

Let's look at the top of the combined card. The main event would consist of Edge, Jeff Hardy, CM Punk, The Undertaker, Batista, The Big Show, John Cena, Shawn Michaels, Triple H and Randy Orton. Now there's an impressive list. We also have the option of bleeding the lines of the main event and the upper mid-card to include Chris Jericho, Kane, John Morrison, Rey Mysterio, Christian, The Miz, MVP and Jack Swagger.

Hmm. That's a lot of people, though. A-ha! However, with this many folks at the top of the card, we can afford to cycle some of the veterans out the way we're seeing done with Taker, HBK and Kane to ensure their best health, minimize risks, and reward those at the top a bit of a reprieve from the hectic WWE schedule, thus, in theory, at least, extending the careers of Taker, Batista, Show, HBK, Kane and HHH. Hell, haven't we even heard comments from Edge and Chris Jericho that they can't bounce back as quickly as they used to ten years ago? Might this not be a wise move, then, all things considered, the least of which being the whole "absence makes the heart grow fonder" axiom that has helped to improve WWE's international live gates? It could also allow for the assumed next generation of main-eventers the opportunity to garner some big time top-of-the-card experience before they have to make or break because the established guard has been forced into retirement or an extended/repeated ring absence because of having been stretched too thin in the waning years of his career.

So, then, in addition to our upper-mid-card of Chris Jericho, Kane, John Morrison, Rey Mysterio, Christian, The Miz, MVP and Jack Swagger, we also have Finlay, Matt Hardy, Tommy Dreamer, Dolph Ziggler, Evan Bourne, Mark Henry, Kofi Kingston, Zack Ryder and Vladimir Kozlov who could also conceivably round out the rest of the male singles' roster, although, again, concerning the ECW conundrum, these names are not written in stone, and, because I drew up these plans before the Trump trade was announced, I'm not including the recent additions to the ECW roster.

Here's another snag in the plan to repeal The Brand Split – do we really want to go through another whole ordeal where we see titles unified and retired? Granted, if there's a stalwart plan in place, one that has been thoughtfully considered and not as seemingly capricious and arbitrary as was the last round, I might be able to get on board. However, this whole thing with the "Unified" tag belts? I'm not buying the fact that the are truly unified until I see one set of belts. I just get the sense that McMahonagement are leasing with a proverbial option to buy here and not committing to a committed course of action until it's convinced one way or another, although if they do take the plunge and unify the titles 100%, could other belts follow? Here's something I've been considering along those lines, if it comes down to one mid-card title, would Vince ultimately choose The InterContinental Title, steeped in his own company's tradition, or the more patriotic United States Title (which is now being featured on the precious flagship show, for the first time).

Back to talk of the roster itself, I want to run support to reader The Great Captain Smooth's idea of THE ODDITIES 2009, or, as he preferred to call them, THE FREAK PATROL. For those who didn't catch it before, Schmoove suggested the idea of putting Santino Marella, Goldust, Hornswoggle and Festus together in one faction on Raw and, correct me if I'm wrong, but I think it was the very next installment that we saw them all together in an eight-man tag match. If we're ending the split, I say add in Funaki and Khali, as well. Given Vince's penchant for "Beauty & the Beast" pairings, I think dumb Maria would work really well here, too, but, considering we've seen her smarten up considerably, that might not be the best course of action, although she did suddenly wise up with no explanation, she could dumb down again without reason, especially if it was entertaining (and kept her ring time to a minimum).

Now, to the rest of the roster. This is where we create a tag division. I'm not saying they have to be as vibrant as the tag scene during The Attitude Era, rather I'm harkening back to the days of Gorilla Monsoon and Jesse Ventura's commentary, when WrestleMania was in the single digits. There were teams who all had varying levels of talent, some with one guy obviously more adept at his craft than the other paired up to give the other guy a crutch (RHYTHM & BLUES) or two lower-level performers who weren't really going to see any main events, but were better together than apart (STRIKE FORCE, THE BEES) and others who had no talent readily seen, but were entertaining to the majority (THE BUSHWHACKERS…yes, I know about their previous incarnation as THE SHEEPHERDERS). The important thing was that they were there to entertain and provide a basic talent pool by which to build up the real upwardly mobile teams like THE HART FOUNDATION, DEMOLITION and THE BRAINBUSTERS. I'm confident we could have that again.

Keep the following pre-existing teams in tact:

CRYME TYME: Shad Gaspard & JTG
THE HART DYNASTY: Tyson Kydd & David Hart Smith
LOS COLONS: Carlito & Primo Colon
PRICELESS: Ted DiBiase & Cody Rhodes

Do not split up Shelton Benjamin & Charlie Haas (in fact, I say pair them up with THE BELLA TWINS: Bella & Brie…hell, throw in Gail Kim and call them THE BENETTON LOVE CONNECTION…I'm kidding), plus, once Joe Hennig heals, call him up to tag with Brian Kendrick, and that's the core of your tag division, the teams with which Creative has an agenda to feature.

Now, the following teams will exist to entertain and enhance the above teams…unless one of them should actually catch on and be a hit, then, by all means, see how far hey can excel! What do you think:

R-Truth & Ezekiel Jackson – It's my understanding (and I could certainly be wrong) that Zeke is down development polishing his skills. He may or may not be ready to be brought back up, but I'm thinking in terms of image and effectiveness. Truth has the flashy moves and the exuberant personality, whereas we could see Zeke as his stoic, dangerous partner with the scary physique and the power moves.

Chavo Guerrero & Ricky Ortiz – Again, back to the notion of mentorship. Ortiz has the charisma and the basics down, but fails to really incite any real kind of reaction from anyone. When he gets pinned, the ovation is for the victor, not because they hate Ortiz and are happy to see him get his ass handed to him. Chavo is an experienced heel and a fantastic performer in the air and on the mat. The fact that nobody has been paired up with him to sit under his learning tree amazes me. And why not hook them up with Eve Torres, to boot?

Jesse & Mike Knox – A different take on Truth & Zeke (in fact, this could be the first program for each). Jesse is a great little wrestler but ended up playing straight man to Festus in his last tag effort. Why not serious him up and have him paired with ultra scary Knox? It keeps Knox from talking as Jesse is just fine on the mic, and allows him to do what he should be doing, kicking people's asses.

Jamie Noble & Jimmy Wang Yang – Now we know these two aren't going anywhere, but can go in the ring. Instead of having them hanging out separately on different brands, doesn't make more sense to "Blair & Brunzell" them as the two plucky rednecks who entertain and wow us, even if they don't ever really score that one victory that could help to propel them up the ranks (especially when we know that's not their purpose)?

William Regal, Paul Burchill & DJ Gabriel – We've discussed this here before and I still merit in putting these three Brits together in a united front, especially with Katie Lea Burchill and Layla in tow. Let people cry about WWE stealing TNA's BRITISH INVASION idea…they've done worse in this vein and made it work (see previous discussions referring to THE ROAD WARRIORS and DEMOLITION). Regal is the obvious leader and, again, we revert back to the tried & true mentorship concept, as both Burchill and Gabriel (whose real name is Steven Lewington, and should revert back to that name for this faction) stand to learn from working so closely with such an amazing hand as Regal. This, I would suggest, should be a stable that receives a good amount of attention and gets a shot at moving up the ranks.

Jim Duggan & Curt Hawkins – Quite frankly, I'd be just as fine with getting Duggan off the active roster and signing him to a Legends/Agent contract and getting rid of Hawkins altogether, but I didn't want to base this article on putting anyone in front of a firing squad. Duggan always gets a favorable response from fans and he might be able to perform a proxy personality bypass on Hawkins, as well as, again, be something of a mentor to the kid if he's going to be employed, and I've always said, if a performer is going to be employed, they may as well be used.

I'm not suggesting Raw revolve around these teams, or that we even see them all the time. Perhaps Superstars is where we start out with some of these lower-level teams, such as the program between Truth & Zeke and Jesse & Knox. If it grows some legs, feature it on one of the other shows and see how far it can go? The worst that happens is a wasted segment, OR we might end up with a new talent ready to ascend.

I've not convinced myself that ending the Brand Split is the right thing to do at this juncture as there are so many issues that must occur to make it so, although there definitely seem to be benefits that shouldn't be immediately dismissed. I mean, the PPVs are already all tri-branded. I want to hear what you think of both the notion of either ending or keeping the Split, as well as to my suggestion where the teams are concerned. Please share your comments!



COMMENTPALOOZA
Great, a load of smarks giving their worthless opinions about the workings of a business they don't understand anywhere near as much as they think the do! Awesome!
Posted By: Guest#7235

Good call Guest 7235! I hope that you realize that sarcasm is the lowest form of humor. Awesome! You rock!

FYI: You just gave your opinion and your on a wrestling website. Ergo, you are a smark giving his opinion.

Back to the real stuff:
Who did MVP screw over to get de-pushed like he has? The man is much better on the mike and in the ring than Cody or Ted, yet he never gets a true push. Wait HHH needs to get back in the main event scene. I totally get it now.
Posted By: Iron Knee


I love it when the Comments section polices itself. You I see you guys moonlighting on other columns, but I consider you my readers…LOL. Yes, 7235, if that's your real name, we are a bunch of smarks giving our worthless opinions about a business we really don't know understand. Welcome to The IWC, dickweed. You, me, all of us, that's what we are and I'm not afraid to admit it. But, had you bothered to actually read the entire article, there was a lot of other stuff besides simple assumption and speculation going on there. Your loss.

Iron Knee, I know! It seems to me that he got lost in the shuffle of the musical faces at the top of the card as people cycle in and out, based upon injury, to say nothing of the confusion surrounding the whole Trump and three-hour Raw hoohahs. Add to that the apparent fact that it was McMahonagement's intention to reprise MVP and Matt Hardy's war over The UST (that was disallowed a satisfactory and meaningful resolution because of the interruptions caused by medical issues on both sides of the fence) since they were both on Raw, only for Matt to rack up a broken hand and a torn Abdominal back-to-back and it might be back to the drawing board for MVP. If he drops the belt soon in somewhat meaningless fashion, I'd start to be concerned about the well-being of his employment. Just a hunch.

Hey Geoff, I've been reading, but haven't had much to say lately. Just wanted to drop in and tell you to keep up the awesome writing.

Oh, and meth does suck. I seen that shit ruin the lives of several members of my family. Being on the outside looking in, made it a lot easier to avoid the drug, seeing what it did to people. But when you are on that shit, it really does consume everything you do. It all becomes about getting that next buzz, no matter what. So if that is what Umaga, or any other wrestler is using, it is easy to see that wrestling would not be their passion anymore, but would instead become a means to an end. In that light, seeing someone walk away from the business instead of getting help doesn't seem to far-fetched. If there is one thing I have learned in life, it is that if someone has a problem, they will not get help, until they are ready, and not anything, or anybody is going to change that.

To The Dude: if you want to see all walks of life doing meth, look no further than Iowa. I've seen users of meth from all walks of life. Different races, different financial brackets, nobody is immune to the potential "fun time" that attracts people to recreational drugs in the first place. I can't really get you pictures, as I don't think I could just walk up and say "Hey, some dude on a website wants to see if Samoans take meth.. Can I have your picture?" :P

One last thing, this column needs a banner. You should talk to The Dude, he does good work. He made a banner for me for the Games Top 5.
Posted By: Todd Vote


Great to hear from you, Toddo, and thanks for the encouragement! Yeah, I forget who said it, I think it was you, actually, who suggested I was losing my smile…lol! Well, I feel like I'm getting a second wind these days and last week was actually more for my benefit as I started to "rehab" my chops, so it doesn't surprise me that it didn't inspire a lot of comments. I'm not bothered by that. As a character of the new Representative of Minnesota might say, "Last week wasn't one of my better shows." I said from the beginning of writing this column, if I do my job properly, then I encourage you, the readers, to comment, thus we start a conversation. Hopefully I'm grinning wide and back on track this week and shall continue to gather momentum as the weeks roll by.

With respect to meth, yeah, again, so horrible. I recall attending a party my first Halloween back in Bakersfield from San Francisco and seeing someone I used to mess around with pretty regularly for the first time in three years and just didn't recognize him. The pretty little face I used to dig so much was gaunt and pale and he'd had installed summer teeth in the interim (I'm assuming you know what summer teeth are).

I had an actual ex whose job required him to travel and the first time we met up after having split, he'd dropped a noticeable amount of weight (and he didn't need to at all to begin with!), had skin that looked like a pizza made of nonfat mozzarella, all pallid, pock-marked and greasy and he'd become the most sarcastic, bitter, spiteful cunt. He was there with seven other co-workers and, I shit you not, five of them separately approached me and told me how much better off I was without him.

And when I learned from them that he'd been cheating on me aggressively while we were supposed to have been seeing one another, I nailed his roommate and made out with his best friend in front of him their last night in town. See? Rednecks and queens have so much more in common than most think (bitter laugh).

Back to rasslin, though, do we know Umaga's left the business altogether or has he simply walked away from WWE? The two do not equate. I suppose it really isn't our business what he's doing in his spare time, and we're pretty much being the equivalent of clucky hens in the barnyard…it's not as if we know him personally or anything and care for him specifically such that we'd consider staging an intervention. However, it is human nature to want to know the entire story in such situations, especially when someone in his position was making what we must assume to be decent-to-good money doing something we assume he loves to do walks away from a promising career with the company that represents being at the top of his field. I said it last week and I'll repeat it here, I don't think we've seen the last of Umaga in WWE, especially since this isn't the first time he's been wished the best in his future endeavors.

I've gotta disagree with your claim that Jericho is the bigger heel of his tandem with Edge.

Edge has been solidly entrenched in the main event scene since his breakout 2006 feud with Cena. Since then he's lengthy feuds with DX, Batista, the Undertaker and WWE's "hottest" commodity right now, Jeff Hardy. In my opinion, until Orton won that triple threat at last year's Wrestlemania, Edge was THE #1 heel in WWE.

Chris Jericho, on the other hand, has spent more time involved with the IC Title since his late-2007 return than he has in the main event scene. After his re-debut in that WWE Title match against Orton - which he won by DQ and never received a rematch - Jericho had his short, ultimately pointless program with JBL, followed by his regaining the Intercontinental strap. It wasn't until his heel turn and captivating feud with Shawn Michaels that he started to gain serious momentum. He surprised everyone by winning the World Championship last September, but was knocked back out of the main event scene by the end of the year, just in time to start smacking around the legends. Since his victory - and ultimate humiliation - at WM25, he's had a great feud over the IC Title (again) with Rey Mysterio. Bottom line, though: it's still the mid-card.

What I'm saying is, even if Jericho is getting more heat right now, Edge is more established. Since Jericho has been around longer, however, and had already won world titles while Edge was just breaking out as a singles competitor, they're probably about even in the fans' eyes.

Simply put, Edge may or may not be a bigger heel - a bigger star - than Chris Jericho, but Jericho is definitely not a bigger heel than Edge.

Wow, I took a throwaway sentence from you, Eubanks, and really turned it into something, well, long.
Posted By: KanyonKreist


I absolutely see your point and you make it well, Kanyon, as usual. As a matter of fact all I had to read was "Edge has been solidly entrenched…" and I knew exactly where you were going. And your argument, as you state it, is completely infallible. However, I just don't think, should it come down to it, the fans would be more inclined to cheer Jericho as readily as they would be Edge and that, to me, is the true measure, the placing of both on the proverbial scale and weighing their "heelitude".

It strikes me that Edge was in a better situation than Jericho ever was, because he was homegrown WWE, whereas Jericho was a WCW convert. Granted, Jericho rose to prominence under the WWE umbrella, but he also started bumping his head with respect to how high he could reasonably expect to ascend. There's a reason why he's held The ICT more times than Edge has been a world champion. Had Jericho not left the company to pursue other interests and then returned, I think he'd be a lot less happy and enthusiastic than he is now (incidentally, check out the differences between Jericho and Christian, both who left the company, but for different reasons, and check out who's in a better position).

However, I will grant you that it's my hunch that fans would be happier booing Jericho at this point because we've seen the heel Edge, the ultimate opportunist for a good long while now and I think people are more interested in seeing a) a fresher act (which Jericho's relatively newer character certainly is), and b) what else Edge has to offer (like whether or not he has it in him to be a legitimate heel who can win a world title in some way other than being the right man at the right time screwing the boss to catch as many breaks as he can).

Like I said, you make a hell of a lot of sense, but your story has another side to it, as far as I'm concerned, as most stories do.

You said: So rather than belaboring the point of The Draft, shall we, instead, consider ending the split…?

B-I-N-G-O!!!!

I never liked the brand split. I gave too many of things I didn't need.

Too many titles
Too many false hopes
Too much illusion
Too much congestion at the top

I believe the main reason we have a tremendous lack in tag team wrestling is because of the brand split. When you have countless single's titles to chase (and have #1 contender's matches for) why bother to sweat over 2 tag team belts (now one)?

I understand the philosophy of the brand split but you just have to call a terd a terd sometimes. The brand split is indeed a terd.

Plus...as if WWE didn't learn anything from WCW attempting to have 2 exclusive shows...you got endless silly workers who had no business on my TV. Zach Gowen, Hornswoggle, Eugene and anything involving a Diva. All of this "entertainment" was brought about because they had less and less meaningful value to pack into these shows each week, since the saturation of titles made them meaningless in the long run.

Let's put it this way, Jake "The Milkman" Milliman would have held multiple belts in this era.

I say (have said) dissolve the brands, make is a tighter E in the process. Groom the talent via the tag team ranks, so they can learn how to do it all before they are given the single's ball.

A $22 Fajita! That is some fajita!!!
Posted By: thegunisgood


It was a chicken fajita burrito, grilled chicken, peppers, onions, served enchilada-style with a huge side of rice and beans. I discovered after I paid the check that all of The Abbey's special items are $16 entrees, so once you add on tax & tip, I ended up with a $22 burrito. A damn good $22 burrito and more than I wanted to spend, but an awesome dinner (that didn't even include the martinis!).

I have to say I take issue with some of your reasons for disapproving of the split. I'm not sure I follow your vague assertions of there being false hopes and illusions (is Doug Hennig Raw's GM next week?!), and, if anything to me, there were more singles titles during The Attitude Era than on a per brand basis now. Too, as today's article displayed, without a split there's a more congestion at the bottom of the card. With a combined roster, as I said, Raw doesn't have to scramble and bring over Mark Henry to stall for time until Batista heals and SD! doesn't have to continue to push Edge when he's plainly expressed that he's hurting. Like I said, a combined roster allows a less demanding schedule for its top tier players and can be used to extent the careers of its aging stars. It seems we agree on the premise, but for different reasons.

The fact is, I suspect we don't have tag team wrestling because Vince only cares about working with the top level of his talent and nobody else has a clue how to write for teams because none of these Hollywood writers ever grew up watching it. And you know we'd have Hornswoggle, Zach Gowen, Eugene and Divas because loves that shit. And remember, he knows what we want more than we do and that's exactly what he gives us.

I have no idea who this Milkman is, but we most certainly agree on your final statement! I'm anxious most of all to hear your thoughts on this week's column, as you were the catalyst for it!

Do you really think Cena is clean 365 days a year? Really?
Posted By: Dr J


Obviously, I am no authority. At my best physical shape, I had a swimmer's build because I swam. DUH! The whole bodybuilding thing never appealed to me, so I never educated myself about anything along those lines, certainly not steroids. I know Cena has a degree in exercise physiology, so that, to me, means he knows how to make the most of his workouts and maximize his results, although the other side of that coin could mean he also knows how to fudge things to his advantage in the most intelligent manner (if there is an intelligent way to cheat). I think because I want to believe this children's hero is as good a guy as he seems, I want to believe he is what he appears to be without resorting to poisoning himself with this crap, but then again, I lived through the Hogan era (although I only bought his bullshit prayers and vitamins act for about five minutes before I called bullshit on it).

Geoff, thanks for the props! That bastard Trump had to go on and trade Goldust away to ECW! My life may never feel complete again. I noticed that you got Henry on Raw correct and as a face! Does that mean we have WWESP? That was bad. Maybe we should travel to state fairs and wow the locals with our "ability"?

Onto the Blair, whether the kids deserved it or not, that wasn't cool and I hope the family turns out ok.

Finally, with Masters, let's have him show up on the Titantron and talk about what happened to him and how he is here to make up for lost time. I'd love to see a good comeback story. The trick for him is to not to get preachy with his message. Tell what he did, ask for forgiveness and see where it goes.
Posted By: The Great Capt. Smooth


Fear not, Schmoove, I laughed at WWESP. We really do seem to be tapped into their creative meetings, don't we? All right, I'll admit it…Heyman gave me the number to conference in, with the warning, "But whatever you do, do not click off before Stephanie!" Hmm…what does that say about us…?!

I don't think any kid deserves to be beaten down by his dad under normal disciplinary circumstances (although they can sure make it tempting…like Chris Rock said, "I don't condone it…but I understand…!"), but we weren't there and we don't know what happened. It seems as if the oldest is somewhat troubled somehow, so I hope that all works out for the best for all involved.

Sorry, dood, I can't get into your Masters scenario, although I'm not into him coming back at all. Your description 1) sounds like an invitation for fans who remember him to boo him (and I mean in an XPac heat kind of way), and/or for newer fans to think, "Geez, what a puss," and not respect him from the start of his second run, and 2) that you're asking him to act well above his means and ability to act at all. Just as Melina is so much better as the spiteful bitch (although she's proven she works well as a face, too), Masters doesn't have to work at all to come off as that snide, clueless, meatheat tool jock and I think, if nothing else and if only in the beginning, that's how he should be handled.

Gotta make it short and sweet. Up in Flair Country (NC) "vacationing" by helping my wife take care of her mother (Alzheimer's sucks worse than meth) and only have a few minutes.

I did cross the finish line (as well as take a raincheck to redeem my manhood the next night) by developing my Jedi-like vibrator skills that dreadful night.

I'm excited about the scattering of the ECW stars. Henry the face, Bourne, and Swagger on Mondays should be decent and I'm looking forward to the Harts on Fridays.

Have a happy fourth, Geoff!
Posted By: Angry Bear


I'm sorry about your mother-in-law. I lost my Grandmother to Alzheimer's. It's a horrible, horrible disease that robs the elderly of their dignity and the ability to pass with grace. Thankfully, it appears as if it's a disease that will eventually be curable, but too late for our loved ones. You guys are really brave and I totally respect you.

Yeah, I wish I'd've been a little more inventive in my finish line story, but I never thought too well on that stuff. I'm so glad even my addictive personality said no to that shit!

Incidentally, did I share with the studio audience that I laid down a couple voice-overs for my company's pitch to LucasArts as Obi-Wan Kenobi? Our national director of flash technology, who also happens to be a huge Star Wars buff, personally came to my desk to thank and congratulate me on a job they "couldn't have gotten from anyone else"? It's a shame because no one but my co-workers and the "pitchees" will hear it, but it was still an honor to do it!

I, too, look forward to the post-scattering landscape (with the exception of the Women's Division). Like I said, ECW seems to be succeeding in purpose!

Whilst reading the comment saying how terrible Carlito and Primo were I was thinking "man, do I disagree with that! Better write a comment!", then read on to see I already had and had forgotten about it.

Carlito and Primo both have pretty explosive movesets, they have cool personas (Primo needs fleshed out more characterwise - perhaps through a feud with Carlito at some point?) and call me a sucker, but I love Carlito's gimmick (I wish he had brought his apple with him to see Teddy Long at the Bash). When I was at the house show in Belfast this year I have to admit I spontaneously stood up and started applauding when Carlito spat his apple (hey, watching wrestling is about having fun, remember!).

I also watched Carlito v Orton from a couple of years back recently, and it was a top quality match. Orton seems to mention Carlito quite a lot as an upcoming star in interviews and the like...Carlito for Legacy! :P

I think Carlito still managing to get title belts after his repeated attempts at career suicide show he must be held in good regard somewhere....he's a big favourite of mine anyway.
Posted By: Ryan


Everyone's certainly allowed to like whomever they choose. I can't share your enthusiasm for Carlito for a variety of reasons, but I respect the fact that you dig his gig. I can get on board with you with respect to the team's moveset a lot sooner than I can support your fandom over his character, which I find to be one-dimensional and shallow, although that's better than Primo, who, thus far, we know likes skinny chicks and competition, but that's fairly epidemic all over WWE at the moment, not just a Colon symptom. I'm glad you remembered to comment!

That's all for this week! Thanks for reading…RESPECK!




Post Comment (29)  |  Email Geoff Eubanks  |  View Geoff Eubanks's 411 Profile

  Send To Friend  |    Stumble It!  |    Digg It!  | 



Please add your comment below.
If you are registered, you can login and post under your registered name. If not, you can post as a guest or register.

* Please note that 411 moderates all comments. Your comment will show up on the site after it has been approved by an editor.
 
Name : 
Comment : 
Remaining Characters : 
2800
 

Comments (29)

 
While there could be a case for ending the brand split, the biggest counter-argument is that every show would be the Cena/Orton/HHH show, instead of every other show. This would pretty much kill upward mobility in the company, and wrestlers like Punk, Jericho and Jeff Hardy would never get past the midcard, except on a temporary basis.

One thing I would like to see is getting the Divas back on one brand. There are far too many of them, very few have any distinctive personality, and even fewer can actually wrestle. Let's shrink down the complement to about 10 or so, have them all on Raw, and get rid of the worst of the bunch.


Posted By: Michael L (Guest)  on July 07, 2009 at 01:07 PM

 
 
Great column this week - main reason I inspired it (well, not really but I have a huge ego)!

I just hated it the split because of reasons I have beat to death and will beat some more under my own banner soon enough. However, that is just me.

Geoff, you read me well as you should after roughly 10 years of us bantering. I believe that that if you run a company, you shouldn't intentionally limit yourself by imaginary position criterias. If the brand split was dissolved, then you see each structure level (main eventers, midcard, women's, tag, comedy, jobbers) sort itself out more definitely.

I don't want to dissolve the brands because I have a certain favorite wrestler that I want to see triumph over all of the others. I want to see entertaining programming with that hint peeked interest I don't have with the current E product and I really haven't had it in a sustained case in a long time. I am really enjoying TNA at the moment because they can and will work with an upper crust in a smart crafty way to keep my interest. I don't always agree with the booking decision outcomes but I want to watch next week to see what will happen next.

What happens next is the key to wrestling lifespan, if no one cares about what happens next, you really have the death of WCW or Global or the AWA (Jake "The Milkman" Milliman's home).

Geofff, you outlined the tag team situation spot on. I agree, the belts aren't unified until there is only one set of belts. More workers could benefit from tagging than working meaningless single's matches. Sure they might be meaningless tag team matches to but there is something about a team being recognized instead of a single being recognized, even when they are stuck on the spin cycle. For instance, The Bushwacker's, even though they never realistically challenged for any title are remembered quite well. Butch William's single's career, not so much. Replace The Wackers with High Energy or The Killer Bees or The Fantastics or even TWGTT post Angle and you have about the same type of results.

I hadn't given a lot of thought to the Diva's/women of the fed under my plan. I have an admission though, McCool might be the best female worker I have seen because her moves are fluid and not set into motion mechanically. As a result, it looks like all of the other women hate working with her because they appear to be getting stiffed in the ring. Frankly, there are only a couple of women who could keep up with her and that isn't enough for me to justify a division of them. I like them being the iciing on the cake though, be it valet's or managers. A plus is if they could be believable as someone who could interfere, ala Martel.

Geoff - I like the idea with the Bella Twins - A LOT!

Solid column-Anxious to see what others think!


Posted By: thegunisgood (Guest)  on July 07, 2009 at 01:24 PM

 
 
'If he was half as committed to selling his "12 Rounds" character as he was to convincing the QAF audience that he was really cornholing young Charlie Hunnam, the film might have been better. I'm just saying."

I doubt it. I don't usually like to bag on movies, But I fell asleep somewhere after round 5, and woke up for the end of this movie. It was that bad.

Got to say, I think you are way off base on Eve Torres as well. She may not be able to wrestle for shit, but she is smokin hot, not sure where the skeletor name calling is coming from.

We've went back and forth on the brand split, and have agreed to disagree in the past. I think the opportunities afforded to more talent makes the brand split worth it, no matter how much WWE shoots themselves in the foot with it by constantly mixing the brands. I absolutely hate it when they mix the brands without rhyme or reason.

How Vince doesn't see the potential in keeping the brands seperate is beyond me. I'd compare it to PPV. Wrestling fans know that a PPV is supposed to be where the big payoff is. As wrestling fans, for the most part, we have been conditioned to believe that the best matches are on PPV, the rivalries end at PPV's. We've been conditioned to believe that. Of course now that isn't always the case, but for the most part it rings true.
To get to my point quicker, why would I choose to tune into Smackdown on a Friday night, if I have something better to do, when I know I won't miss anything by not watching it? They constantly recap raw on Smackdown!, and vice versa. Add to this the fact that I know I will see CM Punk, and Jeff Hardy on Raw at least once every two weeks, and suddenly Smackdown! loses some of it's potential appeal.

If Vince would show some of them grapefruits he had back in the attitude era and just stick to the brand split the way it should be. 100% seperate, fans would start realizing that they are missing half of the goodness by only watching part of the shows. If he could keep the brands completely seperate for 1 year, I'd like to think we would see the result of such action with a bit of a ratings bump across the board.


Posted By: Todd Vote (Registered)  on July 07, 2009 at 01:28 PM

 
 
Totally agree that the only way we'll see a real tag division is through brand unification (SD and Raw, not ECW). I'd go one further with your plan and reintroduce the US Tag Title and Six Man Tag Title. At the same time, the WWE unifies the two world titles and the IC/US titles. Maybe they create a TV title to be defended only on Superstars.

That gives you more than enough props to futz with in regard to feuds. Orton drops the title, then takes Legacy to Six-Man Gold. Then, HHH reunites the remainder of Evolution to take Randy's new gold. This also allows creative to try new guys in high profile programs.

More tag teams are never a bad thing.


Posted By: Iron Knee (Guest)  on July 07, 2009 at 01:40 PM

 
 
As aprevious poster said, the brand split does give more talent the chance to rise up the ranks. Without it every show would be dominated by Cena/Orton/HHH with a little help from Undertaker. If you add Shawn Michaels and Big Show to that as well, how much time will Edge, Jericho, the Hardys, Punk or anyone else get to make an impact. People like MVP, Morrison, Swagger, Christian, Bourne and Ziggler wouldn't get on a lot of the shows.

As for you ideas for Tag Teams, I really like the idea of Truth and Zeke. I think the charismatic and flashy Truth would gel well with the tough and imposing Zeke.

As a Brit myself, I'm all for a TNA style British stable. My idea would be to have William Regal manage a stable (say "Rule Britannia" as their name) which includes Paul Birchill, Sheamus O'Shaunessy and Drew McIntyre (you could also include Steve Lewington). Have them terrorise ECW and taking a cue from the Hart Foundation, make them heels in the US and faces in the UK. It would be pure gold!


Posted By: Pure West (Guest)  on July 07, 2009 at 03:55 PM

 
 
Geoff, I'm digging the idea of having Chavo and Ortiz put together and it was a nice touch to have Chavo as a mentor. I really don't care about the brand split one way or another. I will admit that it is nice to see different types of shows. RAW is the "entertainment" show, SD is the "wrestling" show, and ECW is the "future" show. One final question:Who are some people you want to see be the "guest" GM on RAW? After he leaves TNA, I'd love to see Sting.

Posted By: The Great Capt. Smooth (Guest)  on July 07, 2009 at 05:01 PM

 
 
I like the Noble-Yang team, but with one adjustment. Noble needs to go back to his Jamie-san persona from WCW.

Asian trying to be a Redneck + Redneck trying to be Asian = comedy.


Posted By: guest (Guest)  on July 07, 2009 at 05:41 PM

 
 
"While there could be a case for ending the brand split, the biggest counter-argument is that every show would be the Cena/Orton/HHH show, instead of every other show.
Word. It's bad enough having to see that piece of SHIT HHH on the Raw Recaps they run.


Posted By: Guest#2308 (Guest)  on July 07, 2009 at 05:49 PM

 
 
Jericho in the upper mid-card behind Jeff Hardy, CM Punk, Batista, and The Big Show? You are an idiot lol

Posted By: Guest#8444 (Guest)  on July 07, 2009 at 05:54 PM

 
 
I have a way to save the brand split, actually make it a BRAND SPLIT. In Kayfabe anyway, what you could do is have Vince make "territories" again, turn Smackdown into WCW, that way we'll have WWE, ECW, and WCW, (World Heavyweight Title becomes WCW title.) to start off you have Vince re-hire both Heyman to run ECW (as owner not representitve) and Eric Bischoff to run WCW as owner as well. Have a 3 way dance at WrestleMania between the WWE champion ECW Champion and WCW Champion to become the WORLD HEAVYWEIGHT CHAMPION with it's own history. Unify TAG TEAM, and Woman's/Diva's and the IC/US title.

Now you have 1 World Champ the way it should be, and you have "regional" champs the way it used to be (Each champ is defalut #1 continder and they can have their own fueds for their titles.) There would be 1 Womans Champ, Tag Champ, and Mid-card title to share between the "companies" so that way "creative" can finally find something to do with the other titles.

This is another thing that is crutial to make this work, each brand has their own PPV's and TV shows Raw is TV 14 for the more mature since it's on cable, ECW is TV-MA move it up to 11 PM time slot for the hardcore fans who loved the old ECW (which this will be the old ECW backed by Vince's money) and have WCW's show, be TV-PG since it's on network TV, and aim it at the kids, hey it's WCW after all.

PPV's
January - Royal Rumble - Tri brand (just have it be ROYAL RUMBLE no branding)

February - No Way Out - WWE PPV

March - Guilty as Charged - ECW

April - WRESTLEMANIA - TRI-Brand (night of champions)

May - Spring Stampeed - WCW

June - King of the Ring - WWE

July - Great American Bash - WCW

August - SummerSlam - Tri-Brand

September - Armageddon - WWE

October - Barely Legal - ECW

November - Survivor Series Tri-Brand

December - Starrcade - WCW

PPV's are spaced out far enough to make storylines possable (Royal Rumber same format 3 Championship matches and Royal Rumble, Survivor Series traditional matches Teams made from brands so it's face ECW vs Heel ECW teams and so on) the World Heavyweight Champ defends on every PPV as the Main Event Make that title mean something.

I think that this would help Vince make Wrestling fun again and create some form of competition and raiting wouldn't matter because they are all aimed at a diffrent audience.

he would still have Raw to run WCW would be on that "second rate network" and ECW would still be tv developmental but have some meaning behind it.

Let me know what you think if this gets published in the comment section


Posted By: Eric D (Guest)  on July 07, 2009 at 07:52 PM

 
 
Sorry to hear about your Grandmother, it is truly a horrible disease. Having a 70 year old woman shit and piss herself and then try to hide her soiled undergarments is somewhere in her room is such an ugly way to finish your life. It's a shame.

We have a saying in education (I know, Angry Bear the Educator is a damn scary thought) that some kids are going to be CEO's, some are going to be plumbers (raising future sonsth of plumbersth, if you weeel), and some are going to work fast food. Like you guys said, that's how it is in wrestling. Not everyone is going to be that future main eventer, but many can be valuable members of the undercard that fans can rally for or against. That's where a TV Title (perfect focus point for Superstars) or other secondary titles come in handy. They could be defended only on the regular shows and save the world and other major title matches for PPV.

I like your idea for the tag teams. However, I'd make Festus and Knox a tag team and let Jesse do something else. Is it too soon for a new Blue Blazer?

Also, is it a bad thing that I watched all of Raw Monday night until Triple H and Cena hit the ring, then changed the channel to Dude, Where's My Car? Is it a bad thing that I would rather see Mark Henry in the Main Event instead of those other two. I'm done with the Orton/HHH/Cena triangle. I can live with Orton as champ but the other two need to move on to other things. I'd like them to keep pushing Miz vs Cena until Miz earns his respect and Cena puts him over (at least verbally) with the fans.

I'd also like to see a Diva with a female Ric Flair gimmick. They all seem so personality-less.

Gotta run, still up in NC for one more day.

Take care.


Posted By: Angry Bear (Guest)  on July 07, 2009 at 08:14 PM

 
 
I just don't see Edge getting very over as a babyface. This is mostly due to how sick the fans got of him back in 2004. You know, the whole reason he turned heel to begin with.

Maybe it could work if he totally overhauled his character, kinda like Jericho but in reverse. Maybe he could become less Trent Reznor and more, well, the Rock. You know, a fun-to-watch babyface. The only danger there is of him potentially drifting into Cena territory. You know, "JBL is poopy" and so on...


Posted By: KanyonKreist (Registered)  on July 07, 2009 at 10:27 PM

 
 
I don't know about killing the brand split, but they should rebuild the tag team ranks. With the death of the territory system, something like this is needed to get lower card guys some experience, so that maybe they develop more. Two guys given four minutes for a match doesn't do much, but four guys in an 8-10 minute match is fine. Besides, not every guy can put on a decent 10 minute match, but many can do 2 minutes at a time.
I haven't seen the part about WWE not having enough depth for a tag division. In my opinion they have too many wrestlers that they have no idea what to do with. Prune some of the dead wood and put the rest in tag teams. Really, the mid-card should be in tag teams to give keep them in the audience's eye when they aren't chasing a title. In the event of an injury to a singles competitor, one of tag team guys can step in for his partner or because he has a grudge against the other person in the singles feud.
The WWE strangely hasn't seen the more efficient usage of roster and the development potential of a tag division. This in spite of the fact that Bradshaw wouldn't have lasted as long without the APA, the fact that Edge and Jeff Hardy came to prominence in from the tag ranks, and HBK and Brett Hart becoming known the same way. Besides, wrestlers that were non-entities as singles competitors actually made the WWE money in tags - the New Age Outlaws, the Dudleys, and Faarooq.


Posted By: Guest#9413 (Guest)  on July 07, 2009 at 11:01 PM

 
 
I agree. Let's end the split. That way HHH can not only main event every PPV but also headline every show!

Posted By: HHH Rulz (Guest)  on July 07, 2009 at 11:42 PM

 
 
"Mickie James is the Rachael Ray of WWE."

Are you saying Mickie can cook, or that I can find filthy pics of Rachael Ray on the internet?

I get as mad as anyone when the brand split is ignored, but ending it would be awful. Right now SD is a safe haven from HHH and SuperCena. Without the split, all shows would be as bad as Raw. Does anyone think Punk and Jeff Hardy would be main eventing without the split? Edge would have long ago eaten three months of pedigrees and been demoted to the midcard. You get the idea. The current format suffers from flawed execution, not a fundamental problem.


Posted By: Shockmaster (Guest)  on July 08, 2009 at 11:05 AM

 
 
I have no problem with the brand split, I have a problem with there is nothing about the three different brands. There should be different set of rules for each brand that make them unique. It also makes things interesting when there are 'interpromotional' matches, because the people can lose because they forgot the rules of that partifcular brand.

Posted By: Karatgold24 (Guest)  on July 08, 2009 at 12:01 PM

 
 
It would make sence to have each brand have its own PPV's but if they leave out ECW, all hell will break lose. Should they have a PPV for Superstars? AM Raw? RAW en Espanol?

Posted By: Guest#5563 (Guest)  on July 08, 2009 at 12:08 PM

 
 
Moving The Hart Dynasty off ECW was the smart move. It's hard to have a stable (hell, even a tag team) succeed on ECW which only features ten or so people regularly. They'll benefit from being on SmackDown, the WRESTLING show, and find a bigger part of the viewing audience (though ratings indicate not by much). Plus, being on the same show as Chris Jericho can only mean good things.

You can't go back to a one-brand WWE with the amount of programming they have. You'd have an even staler (staler?) product with the same characters and feuds extending throughout the week. And that's not even getting into how many workers would prolly be cut to trim down the roster cos they don't even feature everyone they have now with three separate brands. Raw feeding into SmackDown worked when SD debuted because it was during the hot period, more wrestling programming was greatly desired, and characters like Austin, Rock, Foley, HHH, DX, etc. were engaging enough to carry the load.

Which Obi-Wan did you do, Guinness or McGregor? There's nothing like a gentle English accent. God, I wish there was a place I could meet English women in the States.


Posted By: neverAcquiesce (Guest)  on July 08, 2009 at 12:14 PM

 
 
"I just don't see Edge getting very over as a babyface. This is mostly due to how sick the fans got of him back in 2004. You know, the whole reason he turned heel to begin with."

I think that's because Edge in '04 was one of those guys WWE was TELLING you to cheer for as opposed to the organic adoration a true babyface needs. Ironically this organic hatred of the face Edge led to the love-to-hate reaction of the Rated R Superstar.


Posted By: neverAcquiesce (Guest)  on July 08, 2009 at 12:19 PM

 
 
I definitely agree with you in this article about the brand split, as a matter of fact this is one of the more organized articles contesting for it.
Still, I feel like there is a way to keep the brands somewhat separate while still keeping the effects. By simply unifying the WWEC with the WHC, and the women's title with the diva's title, The situation may resolve itself.
Look at it this way, if they do it this way, the brands are still competitive with each other, but all the main eventers can challenge each other. The men's and women's champions effectively become multi-brand superstars. This also allows the US and IC titles to remain brand specific and give the superstars unable to compete in the now much deeper world title division to compete for a singles title independent of the other show.
Now, in this theory, I would leave ECW alone. It has effectively been seen as a developmental territory anyway, barring some wikipedia nazis who still think that WWE puts ECW and its combination of green stars and midcarders on par with the established talent on Raw and SD. ECW would do great as a televised territory to develop talent, and if ratings did go down as it was publicly seen as bush league, simply revive the Invasion feud to vault ECW to a world-class brand and merge it then.
This concept is not that difficult, and I think Vince may be thinking along these lines anyway since he merged the tag titles rather than create more tag teams.


Posted By: Hejashadan (Guest)  on July 08, 2009 at 01:04 PM

 
 
Soooo many words about ending the brand split, and yet, you neglected the most important problem. $$$! Two touring companies means double the revenue for house shows. Besides, what's wrong with the brandsplit? RAW is for big name established talent, ECW is a developmental system with a TV deal and Smackdown is where the nonstop action is with new & upcoming stars. It's a GOOD thing. Leave it alone.

Posted By: MDK (Guest)  on July 08, 2009 at 01:55 PM

 
 
People are complaining about the brand split? I refuse to watch John Cena 4 nights a week. I just cant do it.

Posted By: Guest#4462 (Guest)  on July 08, 2009 at 03:45 PM

 
 
Combining the brands is a good idea but it's also a bad idea. Why hasn't Smackdowns ratings ever climbed higher? Well that's because the feuds from the most watched show, RAW, don't continue on Friday nights. It's a whole new set of talent with a whole new bunch of storylines. You're not worried about missing anything because according to RAW, Smackdown's storylines barely exist. I will be the first to admit that I've barely watched Smackdown since the roster split even though some of my favorites are there now.

The problem is they simply have too much talent. From RAW to FCW. Jobs would be lost in an already crappy economy, Vince would be paying wrestlers to sit at home which i can't see his cheap ass doing, and wrestlers that are ready for a push would be set aside so John Cena could have his match. In the end we would lose out on future stars that would otherwise never have a chance to grow. At the same time they might grow some place else in the form of competition. *gives you the Vince dirty look*

The solution? Easy. Slap another hour on Superstars then let storylines from both shows be featured, and actually progress. Mix it well and use it for the storylines they want to develop further. There's your non-split show. They're already doing it to a small degree but it can be developed alot further.

I better stop now. Just give me a column already. I'm holding back here lol.


Posted By: Burnout (Guest)  on July 08, 2009 at 04:50 PM

 
 
Eric D
If Vince didn't do this in 2001/2002 what's the point of doing it now.
WCW is nothing but a bad memory to many people


Posted By: nanoman (Guest)  on July 08, 2009 at 09:24 PM

 
 
If Vince would show some of them grapefruits he had back in the attitude era and just stick to the brand split the way it should be. 100% seperate, fans would start realizing that they are missing half of the goodness by only watching part of the shows. If he could keep the brands completely seperate for 1 year, I'd like to think we would see the result of such action with a bit of a ratings bump across the board.

Posted By: Todd Vote (Registered) on July 07, 2009 at 01:28 PM

The problem would be if the ratings nad ppv buys did not stay the same or improve. Then the complete brand split would get killed again.


Posted By: nanoman (Guest)  on July 08, 2009 at 09:57 PM

 
 
Eric D
If Vince didn't do this in 2001/2002 what's the point of doing it now.
WCW is nothing but a bad memory to many people

Yes but if the Rise and Fall of WCW DVD does well we might get a revival of WCW the same way that we got a revival of ECW granted ECW still was awesome towards the end where WCW was a run away truck just waiting to explode. I'm sure there are still tons of WCW fans out there. They would probably watch it plus it's Friday night show aimed at the preteens and tweens. It doesn't have to be WCW but for the sake of my argument I used WCW so that it would make the idea of the new "territories" work better then haveing Raw Champ, ECW Champ, and Smackdown Champ under the full WWE umbrealla, plus if done correctly there could be no mention of WWE on Friday or Tuesday, and the Thursday show can be called WRESTLING SUPERSTARS instead of WWE superstars, and keep the whole "only place to see all 3 brands at one time" If anyone else has any suggestions, or input i'd love to hear it, because maybe someone from TNA or WWE read the comment sections, and if we give them enough good ideas they might just use them.. who knows stranger things have happened...


Posted By: EricD (Guest)  on July 08, 2009 at 10:38 PM

 
 
yeah they might as well,they could get rid of like 40 guys,4 commentators,3 titles,1 ppv and like an hour of TV(ECW)lmao...

fuck the brand extension,thats PRECISLEY when the boom really died to me.


Posted By: MacDollarz. (Guest)  on July 08, 2009 at 11:50 PM

 
 
While there could be a case for ending the brand split, the biggest counter-argument is that every show would be the Cena/Orton/HHH show, instead of every other show. This would pretty much kill upward mobility in the company, and wrestlers like Punk, Jericho and Jeff Hardy would never get past the midcard, except on a temporary basis.

One thing I would like to see is getting the Divas back on one brand. There are far too many of them, very few have any distinctive personality, and even fewer can actually wrestle. Let's shrink down the complement to about 10 or so, have them all on Raw, and get rid of the worst of the bunch.

Posted By: Michael L (Guest) on July 07, 2009 at 01:07 PM

So it would just be exactly the way it is right now?

I do like your idea about the divas, along with Geoff's plan for tag teams.

I don't remember the WWE having this problem during the Attitude Era. They were able to have a awesome main event, a great midcard and low-card, plus tag teams and divas. Plus, they were able to do all of these things at the SAME time and on BOTH RAW and Smackdown. What the heck happen?

While the brand split was fun at first, I think it has outlived it's usefullness, with one exception. I think ECW should be kept the way it is with promising newcomers along with veterans who need some freshening up. Then you can bring them up with into the main roster when ready.

But there is no reason not to combine the RAW and SD rosters. During the Attitude Era, both shows were mandatory viewing because performers and feuds carried over to both shows. Now you can safely just pick your favorite show and skip the other. That has to be costing the WWE some money.

Both shows should be about wrestling, exciting performers, and great stories. Why should one show be about one thing while the other show be about another?

Vince just need to pick the best writers from Raw and SD and have them work together on both shows.

As for the wrestlers that would be out in the cold in a combined roster? Chances are they aren't be wisely used now (looking at you Paul Burchill) and can safely be eliminated. Sad but true.


Posted By: JLAJRC (Guest)  on July 09, 2009 at 12:14 AM

 
 
Question to people who want to end the brand split :

Do YOU Want to have HHH, John Cena or Dave Batista as THE ONLY WWE WORLD HEAVYWEIGHT CHAMPION EACH YEAR ?

NO ?

Then Stop talking about ending the brand split RIGHT NOW.


Posted By: Brand Split >>> HHH/Cena/Tista (Guest)  on July 09, 2009 at 04:59 PM

 


www.41mania.com
Copyright � 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.