www.411mania.com
|  News |  Columns |  TV Reports |  Video Reviews |  Title History |  Hall of Fame |  News Report |  The Dunn List |
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// Star Wars Episode I Brings In $1.1 Million in Midnight Showings
MUSIC
// First Official Pics of Beyonce and Jay-Z With Blue Ivy Posted
WRESTLING
// Impact Wrestling Rating
POLITICS
// Obama Showing Strongest Poll Numbers In Months
MMA
// Click Here To Join 411’s LIVE XFC 16: High Stakes Coverage
GAMES
// Star Trek Sequel Game in the Works


 HOT TOPICS
//  CM Punk
//  John Cena
//  Triple H
//  Hulk Hogan
//  Randy Orton
//  Christian
SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds





Follow 411mania on Twitter!




Add 411 On Facebook
 



 
 411mania » Wrestling » Columns



Advertisement
The Piledriver Report 09.23.09: Wrestling- The Hot Topics
Posted by Ronny Sarnecky on 09.23.2009



Due to unforeseen personal circumstances, I failed to send in last week's edition of "The Piledriver Report." Within the last two weeks, there have been numerous stories that have broken out in the professional wrestling industry. Instead of covering one topic, as per usual with this column, I will look at a number of issues that have been hot topics in sports entertainment.

JEFF HARDY'S ARREST



When I first heard about Hardy's arrest, I can't say that I was shocked. I can say that I was disappointed though. By now, everybody knows what happened. Somebody tipped off the police. Jeff Hardy's house was raided, and the law enforcement officers found a bunch of "goodies" that were just cause for Jeff Hardy to be arrested.

Before commenting on the situation, I wanted to hear all of the details surrounding the case. Now that I have heard most of the public details, I feel I can comment on Jeff Hardy's arrest.

One of the charges that Jeff Hardy is facing is drug trafficking. In no way do I think Jeff Hardy was dealing drugs. Why would he need to? The WWE was trying to throw money at Jeff Hardy to resign with them. I think there are two possibilities on why Jeff had enough drugs to warrant a "trafficking" charge.

The first possibility centers on the Vince steroid trial. For those of you who don't remember Vince's trial in the mid-nineties, the federal government had McMahon in court on criminal charges for distribution of steroids, among other things. One of the issues raised in court was that steroids were delivered to Titan Towers for Vince McMahon, and Vince was then giving the shipment to Hulk Hogan. Vince claimed that he was not selling steroids to Hulk Hogan, but sharing them with him as friends. I could easily see Jeff Hardy in this position. He had all of these drugs for his use, and use among his friends. That is more likely then Jeff being a drug dealer.

The second, and more realistic, possibility is that Jeff Hardy has a big drug problem. If this is indeed the case, it is time for Jeff to get the help that he obviously needs. The WWE has a three strikes wellness policy. Strike one was in the summer of 2007 when he was suspended for thirty days causing him to miss SummerSlam 2007. His second Wellness failure took place in the Spring of 2008. This time, Jeff Hardy was suspended for sixty days. He missed WrestleMania XXIV, where he was scheduled to win the Money in the Bank match. Not only did the biggest push of his career get put on hold, but he lost out on the biggest wrestling pay day of the year. He had one strike left, and couldn't afford to get a final strike.

A third strike would mean that he would get terminated from the company. Jeff got busted two weeks after he left the WWE. Something tells me that Hardy was doing these drugs during his final stint in the WWE. This means that he was risking his career in order to get high. To me, that shows that Jeff has a huge drug problem. Hopefully, Jeff gets the help he truly needs. Until then, CM Punk was right about Hardy all along.

BATISTA'S BIG ANNOUNCEMENT



During the September 14th edition of RAW, Batista appeared in the opening segment with a big announcement. After surprising Randy Orton with the fact that he is now healthy, he let the crowd, and home audience know, that he is retiring from RAW, but moving to the SmackDown! brand.

This was not the news I was hoping for. After having the pleasure of watching Edge, Rey Mysterio, Jr., Chris Jericho, CM Punk, John Morrison, Dolph Ziggler, Jeff Hardy, and the Hart Dynast, the WWE has decided to ruin my show. With Rey out on his Wellness suspension, and Jeff Hardy no longer under contract (and maybe doing five to ten), the SmackDown! brand is severely lacking in the face side.

I understand why the WWE brought Batista over, but I can't help but be disappointed by the fact that Batista is going to clog up the SmackDown! main event scene. CM Punk has been such an awesome heel as of late. With all due respect to Chris Jericho, once Edge went out with his injury, CM Punk has carried the SmackDown! brand. What I fear now is that the WWE will try to put the World Heavyweight title on Batista's waist as soon as they can get a Punk vs. Batista match signed up.

I do not understand the fascination with Batista. He's not a good worker, unless he is in the ring with Triple H, Edge, or the Undertaker. His promos are boring. All Batista has in a steroid enhanced body. Besides, what ever happened to the Batista heel turn? Instead, I fear we will get a face Batista running wild on all of the best heels that SmackDown! has to offer.

SPECIAL GUEST STAR



On June 22nd, Vince McMahon announced that instead of naming a new RAW General Manager, each week RAW would have a special celebrity guest GM. The new concept is now three months old. Throughout this last quarter of the year, the WWE has provided both celebrities, as well as wrestling legends, to host RAW on a given week.

The list of guest hosts includes Bob Barker, Jeremy Piven, Cedric the Entertainer, Bob Barker, Trish Stratus, Sgt. Slaughter, Ted DiBiase, Dusty Rhodes, ZZ Top, Floyd Mayweather, Seth Green, Freddie Prince, Jr., Shaquille O'Neal, and Batista.

After three months, I feel we have given the guest GM role a long enough run to decide whether or not the role has been successful. I feel that the GM spots have been a mixed bag right now. For every successful SHAQ appearance on RAW, we've had to deal with disasters like Jeremy Piven and Dr. Ken. For the most part, the best guest GMs have been the wrestling legends, except for Sgt. Slaughter, who was put in a no-win situation. The best guest GMs were SHAQ, Mayweather, and Bob Barker, who shockingly received one of the biggest pops on RAW.

Despite the mixed reviews on the RAW GMs, in my opinion, the guest GM role has been a failure in the long run. The reason is because the guest General Manager role is supposed to enhance the product. Instead, the role takes away from the RAW telecasts. Very few people watch RAW because of who is hosting the show. Plus, after the initial guest GM appearances, the WWE hardly receives any publicity for these appearances any more. So, why even bother anymore?

My biggest complaint in regards to the RAW guest GM has to do with the fact that the WWE spends so much time on their special GMs that it takes away from their actual product. In two weeks, the WWE will be presenting their next pay per view. However, instead of spending every minute they can to build up interest in the Hell in a Cell show, the WWE wastes time on a ten-minute stand-up routine by Cedric the Entertainer. Later, they follow this up by having Cedric in a wrestling match. Wouldn't their time have been better spent by running some meaningful angles for the pay per view? Or how about using the time to air a long, exciting match that would make fans of SmackDown! proud?


Post Comment (20)  |  Email Ronny Sarnecky  |  View Ronny Sarnecky's 411 Profile

  Send To Friend  |    Stumble It!  |    Digg It!  | 



Please add your comment below.
If you are registered, you can login and post under your registered name. If not, you can post as a guest or register.

* Please note that 411 moderates all comments. Your comment will show up on the site after it has been approved by an editor.
 
Name : 
Comment : 
Remaining Characters : 
2800
 

Comments (20)

 
since they began the guest hosting, i have totally stopped watching raw. in my eyes, the wwe only has two brands. as you said, raw has become a showcase for the guest host and not the talent.

i like batista. his stay on smackdown will only work if he stays competitive and not run roughshod over punk and the rest of the roster.


Posted By: rey (Guest)  on September 23, 2009 at 04:08 PM

 
 
Dr Ken and Piven were great anyone saying otherwise has never watched entourage

Posted By: The Rev (Guest)  on September 23, 2009 at 04:47 PM

 
 
Don't worry, Batista will be reinjured before he can even get to the next PPV. Let's be honest, the guy can't step through ringropes without throwing out his back

Posted By: asdfr (Guest)  on September 23, 2009 at 06:54 PM

 
 
Dr ken was an annoying idiot, regardless of Entourage. I wanted to smach his face in with a bottle.

Posted By: KET (Guest)  on September 23, 2009 at 07:31 PM

 
 
The Raw guest host gimmick has made me watch more episodes of Raw since the draft. I have a busy schedule and its hard to watch wrestling, but with the guest hosts I have gone out of my way to make time. This coming Monday, Al Sharpton hosts and I will DEFINITELY be catching Raw. The Rev = Ratings.

As for Batista going to Smackdown I was highly HIGHLY disappointed about that as well. How about pushing Morrison as a main event face instead? Having your intercontinental champion going for the world title increases the value of the intercontinental title. Furthermore, feuding Morrison and CM Punk brings up past history and a match b/w Morrison and Ziggler for the IC title can see a title switch via Punk interference and give Ziggler something to build him up, and push the Morrison/Punk feud even more.

Need more Smackdown faces, give Matt the post Jeff feud with Punk he deserves. And also push R-Truth, the IWC may not like him and Vince may not want him to be a main eventer, so just push him for one month to go for the main title and ultimately lose. He can be a solid main eventer that never wins the title but always seems like a threat.

Just keep Batista out. The only good I can see in having Batista on Smackdown is the WWE giving CM Punk the chance to clearly beat Batista while world champion, the chance that he didn't get when he became champ on Raw.


Posted By: Guest#0531 (Guest)  on September 24, 2009 at 01:42 AM

 
 
First off, congrats on being the one slighty unbiased opinion on Jeff Hardy. He wasn't trafficing a damn thing and was a drug addict who got there taking 90 foot swantons (or whatever) sacrificing his body.. Now the addiction is in the end his own fault, but don't say the distribution charges aren't ridiculous and have something to do with the fact that he was a normal sized man in a giant steroid loved world and went through extremes to succeed at his own peril (see Chris Benoit).. Doesn't make it right but gimme a break with all you smark writers giving him so much crap..

And on the guest G.M role do you writers ever understand that there are plenty of us who couldn't care less about the pay per view.. We are the casual viewer, and maybe the guest gm (or Santino's comedy, etc) are the only reason we tune in on a half ass basis? The matches are long and boring for the most part, and so are the same 4 top figures promos.. Seing how Bob Barker interacts, however, makes me watch.. In the wrestling worlds' heyday you had this viewer. Now you don't. So you deal with guest host and I'll deal with Orton, HHH, Batista, etc... 20 min snoozefest matches that all end with the same booking.. deal?


Posted By: getaclue (Guest)  on September 24, 2009 at 02:20 AM

 
 
KET, Dr. Ken was SUPPOSED to be annoying... so if you really wanted to smash his face in with a bottle, that means he was doing his job. Does anyone on these comment boards remember how the pro wrestling business works? Jesus.

Posted By: Tom (Guest)  on September 24, 2009 at 03:09 AM

 
 
"Dr. Ken was SUPPOSED to be annoying... so if you really wanted to smash his face in with a bottle, that means he was doing his job. Does anyone on these comment boards remember how the pro wrestling business works? Jesus."

It only makes sense to act like a tit to get heel heat if you are sticking around. What good does heel heat do you if you leave forever after two hours? Will that heat make people buy tickets or tune in to see a mighty face defeat him - i.e. did Cena assaulting him make ANY money? At all? Even a nickel?

No. So you had a guy being annoying just to be annoying, which doesn't say 'watch nex week to see this guy get his', it says 'this really sucks quite badly, put on a Spin City DVD.'


Posted By: Loki (Guest)  on September 24, 2009 at 07:45 AM

 
 
The guest host thing is a joke, and Batista is nothing more than a bad Goldberg wannabe. He sucks.

Posted By: awsome69 (Guest)  on September 24, 2009 at 07:54 AM

 
 
KET, Dr. Ken was SUPPOSED to be annoying... so if you really wanted to smash his face in with a bottle, that means he was doing his job. Does anyone on these comment boards remember how the pro wrestling business works? Jesus.

Posted By: Tom (Guest) on September 24, 2009 at 03:09 AM

Yeah, I bet Jesus does know how the business works. Good point.


Posted By: IWC Member #23495867 (Guest)  on September 24, 2009 at 08:11 AM

 
 
KET, Dr. Ken was SUPPOSED to be annoying... so if you really wanted to smash his face in with a bottle, that means he was doing his job. Does anyone on these comment boards remember how the pro wrestling business works? Jesus.

Posted By: Tom (Guest) on September 24, 2009 at 03:09 AM

Yes, I do.


Posted By: Jesus (Guest)  on September 24, 2009 at 08:12 AM

 
 
"KET, Dr. Ken was SUPPOSED to be annoying... so if you really wanted to smash his face in with a bottle, that means he was doing his job. Does anyone on these comment boards remember how the pro wrestling business works? Jesus.

Posted By: Tom (Guest) on September 24, 2009 at 03:09 AM"

Was Pivin supposed to be stupid also? Because he sure wasn't entertaining. After watching him guest host Raw, I thought to myslef that they'll give emmy's to anyone.


Posted By: mogamer (Guest)  on September 24, 2009 at 08:27 AM

 
 
Ronny, nice intelligent dissection of the Hardy situation.

Posted By: Angry Bear (Guest)  on September 24, 2009 at 09:34 AM

 
 
I don't really mind the guest GMs. Besides, what people have to understand is that Raw is meant to be the "entertainment" show while Smackdown is the "wrestling" show. That said, the guest GMs help keep the very stale Raw show somewhat interesting.

Even though the IWC knows about Jeff Hardy's drug issues, that 12 year old in the audience who's sporting the Jeff Hardy outfit doesn't, and that is why he will always have a place in the WWE even if he walks into Vince's office with blow all over his face.

Batista is friends with HHH and fans worship him because of his theme music. That is why he will continue to win championships.


Posted By: Orlando (Guest)  on September 24, 2009 at 09:47 AM

 
 
I have completely stopped watching raw because of this....I miss WRESTLING!!!

Posted By: Mikey (Guest)  on September 24, 2009 at 10:06 AM

 
 
I really don't think you should try to speak for everyone on the guest host deal, since you don't really seem to understand the general reaction to them. The guest host concept has been a solid win. Yes, there is a (very) vocal minority that hates them and wants REAL WRASSLIN! (you seem to be one of those people -- Batista has now ruined Smackdown for you? Please.) Want proof that the guest host is a good idea? Last week, RAW held a steady 3.4 in the ratings, despite being up against the first week of Monday Night Football. That should be considered an "increase" in ratings, since typically RAW would see it's numbers take a bit hit when MNF starts. Sorry to introduce facts into your theory.

Posted By: MDK (Guest)  on September 24, 2009 at 12:02 PM

 
 
"And on the guest G.M role do you writers ever understand that there are plenty of us who couldn't care less about the pay per view.. We are the casual viewer, and maybe the guest gm (or Santino's comedy, etc) are the only reason we tune in on a half ass basis? The matches are long and boring for the most part, and so are the same 4 top figures promos.. Seing how Bob Barker interacts, however, makes me watch.. In the wrestling worlds' heyday you had this viewer. Now you don't. So you deal with guest host and I'll deal with Orton, HHH, Batista, etc... 20 min snoozefest matches that all end with the same booking.. deal?"

Posted By: getaclue (Guest) on September 24, 2009 at 02:20 AM

COSIGN...
I use to be a fan of Raw but I have to agree with you on the boring matches. I am not entertained what so ever and have now been reduced to watching Raw during the commercials of Heroes and Dancing With The Stars and read about the missed highlights the next day just to find out I really didnt miss much.


Posted By: Tee (Guest)  on September 24, 2009 at 02:07 PM

 
 
Man its almost like Vince mcmahon doesnt care what Ronny Sarnecky wants. Batista is a main event guy[ something Smackdown is lacking now] i see no harm in giving big Dave a place to work,and with the Undertaker on his way out there is a need for a big guy on the roster. i am all for John Morrison getting a push but they need a big name for the interem.. Sorry pal but if you want to see a show with nothing but mid carders and no real main eventers there is always RoH

Posted By: Old school fan (Guest)  on September 24, 2009 at 06:39 PM

 
 
""Dr. Ken was SUPPOSED to be annoying... so if you really wanted to smash his face in with a bottle, that means he was doing his job. Does anyone on these comment boards remember how the pro wrestling business works? Jesus."

It only makes sense to act like a tit to get heel heat if you are sticking around. What good does heel heat do you if you leave forever after two hours? Will that heat make people buy tickets or tune in to see a mighty face defeat him - i.e. did Cena assaulting him make ANY money? At all? Even a nickel?

No. So you had a guy being annoying just to be annoying, which doesn't say 'watch nex week to see this guy get his', it says 'this really sucks quite badly, put on a Spin City DVD.' "

I know it's the cool thing to write off EVERY SINGLE SEGMENT not geared towards a long term angle, but that's bullshit. You have to give the fans setups and payoffs for that particular show, while at the same time setting up stuff for the future. Otherwise, what's the point of watching the current show? Nothing will get paid off. Nothing important will happen because it's not the "end" of the feud or angle.

It's a balancing act. And Raw is meant to be mostly sports entertainment, while Smackdown is meant to be more wrestling oriented. If you don't like the completely, 100% unabashed attempt at sports entertainment on Raw, don't watch. They've got enough people watching. I understand that everyone has an opinion, and they're all technically valid. But for Christ's sake, you act like Raw is trying to promote itself as having ****-***** matches every single week, and then baiting us with promos and interviews. That's what their whole aim is, people.


Posted By: Guest#2425 (Guest)  on September 24, 2009 at 10:56 PM

 
 
I'm still waiting for Vince to give me a call. I mean, seriously.. Who doesn't remember how GREAT I was?!

Posted By: Mongo (Guest)  on September 27, 2009 at 06:01 PM

 


www.41mania.com
Copyright � 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.