411 Fact or Fiction 12.03.09: Sheamus's Title Shot, 4 Hour Impact, Hogan's Media Comments and More!
Posted by Jeremy Thomas on 12.03.2009
Is Sheamus a fine choice to challenge John Cena at TLC? Is four hours of Impact on New Year's Eve too much? Is it too early to split Eric Escobar and Vickie Guerrero? Is the WWE setting the wrong example by promoting Jeff Hardy's DVD and pushing CM Punk as a heel? Jeff Small and Scott Slimmer debate these topics and more in the latest edition of 411 Wrestling Fact or Fiction!
It's Wednesday night/Thursday morning, which means just one thing…it's time for another edition 411 Wrestling Edition of Fact or Fiction! I'm your moderator as always, Jeremy Thomas, and despite having a slow news week thanks to Thanksgiving, we still have a lot to talk about! This week in our panel are another two of our Wrestling Zone writers, with Instant Access man Scott Slimmer going head to head with the one and only Jeff Small, the man behind the Small-For-All News Report and the Great Khali's biggest fan! These two are no strangers to each other and have a lot to say, so let's get to it!
Questions were sent out Monday.
Participants were told to expect WWE & TNA-related questions.
1. Sheamus is a perfectly fine choice to challenge John Cena for the WWE Heavyweight Title at TLC.
Jeff Small:FICTION. If the WWE really wanted to build Sheamus up as a challenger for Cena's belt, he should have been placed in a #1 contender's match at TLC to obtain a title shot at the Royal Rumble. The Rumble is already known for its midcard title matches including Bob Holly/Brock Lesnar, Mark Henry/Kurt Angle, and Ken Kennedy/Batista. Sheamus would have been a perfectly fine choice at that time. Not now when there's no time to make him a credible opponent.
Scott Slimmer:FICTION. There are two fundamental flaws in choosing Sheamus to challenge John Cena at TLC. First, Sheamus hasn't been on Raw long enough to have become credibly established as a threat to Cena's title. Sheamus had only been a member of the Raw roster for four weeks when he was named the Number One Contender, and in that time all he had done was retire a veteran jobber, beat a nameless jobber, attack a timekeeper, and kick an announcer, in that order. His sole credible accomplishment was pinning John Morrison to pick up the victory for Team Miz at Survivor Series, but one pinfall over the Intercontinental Champion still doesn't make you a credible threat to the WWE Champion. Second, there were better choices than Sheamus to be John Cena's next challenger. I applaud WWE for attempting to elevate new talent by giving a title shot to someone that has never been a world champion, and I would understand choosing Sheamus if there was no better choice available. Unfortunately, in this case there were two better options from which to choose. If Jack Swagger had maintained his undefeated streak and not lost to Evan Bourne three weeks ago, then he would have provided Cena with a more established and more technically competent challenger. But as far as I'm concerned, the best choice for Cena's next challenger was actually Kofi Kingston. Say what you will about face / face matches and feuds, but the crowd was behind Kofi and ready to see him elevated to the top of the card.
Score: 1 for 1
2. Four hours on TNA Impact on New Year's Eve is overkill, even if part of it is a "Best Of 2009" show.
Jeff Small:FICTION. You know I always hear the complaint that most episodes of Impact always feel rushed as nothing has time to breathe. Well, on a four hour edition of Impact, the company can either slow things down to normal pace or go through two months of storylines. Either way, I think it's a win for us viewers.
Scott Slimmer:FACT. This is in no way meant to be a critique of TNA, the TNA talent, or the TNA product, but rather recognition of the fact that four hours of continuous professional wrestling is overkill in almost any situation. We as a wrestling audience have been conditioned to watch televised wrestling in one or two hour increments and to expect pay-per-view wrestling to be presented in roughly three hour packages. Deviation from that established formula tends to a make the product feel drawn out and bloated, irrespective of the quality of the additional programming. Three hour Raw specials usually feel too long despite the fact that they usually feature additional talent from Smackdown and ECW, and the four hours allotted to WrestleMania each year usually seem to drag a bit even though WrestleMania is the single most important wrestling show of the year. In the case of the special episode of TNA Impact on New Year's Eve, the four hour program could feel especially long if a significant portion of the show is dedicated to "Best of 2009" segments features clips and matches that previously aired earlier in the year. TNA is traditionally a niche product with a consistently loyal fan base, and I have to believe that most of the viewers watching Impact on New Year's Eve would have also watched the vast majority of Impact episodes during the course of the year. And as much as I love professional wrestling, I can think over of several better ways to spend New Years Eve than watching reruns of matches that I've already seen.
Score: 1 for 2
3. It's too early in Eric Escobar's tenure to have him strike out on his own without Vickie Guerrero or someone else as a manager.
Jeff Small:FICTION. For as much as I love Vickie Guerrero in the WWE, she totally steals the entire spotlight from Escobar. There's no way for Escobar to get over if he's constantly in Vickie's shadow. Now without Vickie, Escobar has a chance to develop a character, possibly show off a more varied offense (than steal a match with Vickie's help), and rise to the occasion. And if he doesn't it's back to developmental or ECW for him.
Scott Slimmer:FACT. Eric Escobar's lack of proven promo skills, coupled with his extremely brief tenure on televised WWE programming, would seem to indicate that he would be best served by remaining with a proven mouthpiece such as Vickie Guerrero. Unlike many rising stars that are introduced on ECW before being moved to either Smackdown or Raw, Escobar was introduced directly on Smackdown only two months ago. He wasn't given the opportunity to establish himself in the WWE equivalent of the kiddie pool. The fans still have very little idea who he is as a wrestler or as a character, but up until last Friday he was at least clearly identifiable as Vickie Guerrero's boyfriend. Vickie Guerrero may very well be the best heel in the business at the moment (just listen to the deafening heat she gets every time she steps through the curtain), and being associated with Vickie Guerrero meant that Eric Escobar was somebody. But now? Now he's just a guy that used to be associated with Vickie Guerrero, and that basically makes him nobody. Maybe Escobar will eventually prove himself to be phenomenal in the ring. Maybe Escobar will eventually show that he has tremendous skill on the mic. But that will take time, and in the meantime he needs a way to keep his head above water and stand out from the beige background of mid-card talent. Vickie Guerrero was exactly the kind of life preserver that could have bought Escobar the time that he needed to prove himself, but now he'll be forced to sink or swim solely on his own merits.
Score: 1 for 3
4. Bobby Lashley will make a good feud for whoever comes out of Final Resolution as the TNA World Champion.
Jeff Small:FACT. Lashley's over, has name recognition thanks to his time in the WWE (and possibly MMA), and hasn't looked like a total idiot yet. He's perfect for a main event feud at Final Resolution.
Scott Slimmer:FACT. This one is a total toss up, and ultimately it comes down to whether or not you want to give Bobby Lashley the benefit of the doubt. Compared to other possible title contenders on the TNA roster, Lashley does not have the strongest track record of high quality matches. However, it's important to remember that Lashley is still only five years into his professional wrestling career, and he was away from the game for nearly two years in the middle. He has an amazing look, is incredibly naturally athletically gifted, and is well versed in the fundamentals of wrestling, so I choose to give him the benefit of the doubt and expect that his ability to craft a coherent, compelling match will continue to increase. However, the other obvious issue associated with Lashley is his promo skill (or lack thereof), but it should be possible to successfully manage this difficulty through careful booking. Yes, I know, I just used the phrase "careful booking" in regards to a company run by Vince Russo and / or Hulk Hogan, but like I said, I'm trying to be an optimist here. If Lashley is allowed to let his actions speak louder than his words, then he should be able to assert himself as a monstrous challenger to the champion. Lashley is much larger than both AJ Styles and Christopher Daniels, and so the physical storytelling of the feud should be able to compensate for Lashley's lack of verbal skill. Bobby Lashley still has the potential to be a major star for TNA, and it'll be interesting to see if they can showcase his strengths better than WWE did.
Score: 2 for 4
SWITCH!
5. The WWE is setting the wrong kind of image to the kids they are trying to market to by promoting Jeff Hardy's DVD set and then continuing to push CM Punk as a heel.
Scott Slimmer:FACT. Professional wrestling is a very bizarre business. We all know that. For reasons that I still don't fully comprehend, it seems as though many of the societal values and norms that we have become accustomed to in everyday life simply do not exist within the world of the squared circle. Such was the case when Jeff Hardy and CM Punk were feuding over the World Heavyweight Championship earlier this year. Hardy's history of drug abuse and Punk's straight edge lifestyle were dealt with surprisingly openly during the course of the feud, and yet at that point it didn't bother me that Hardy was being booked as the face and Punk as the heel. It may seem counterintuitive to book a proponent of drug use as a face (and, in fact, as your world champion), but it's important to remember that Jeff Hardy's drug use was in his past at that time. As far as most of us knew, Jeff Hardy was a man that had defeated his demons. But as we've all learned far too many times in this industry, demons have a nasty little habit of rearing their heads when you least expect. And so when Jeff Hardy was arrested for having lots… and lots… and lots and lots and lots of drugs, WWE should have realized that they were no longer in a position to promote his live-for-the-moment lifestyle. Jeff Hardy has not defeated his demons, and continuing to promote his DVD while pushing CM Punk as a heel only serves to carelessly glorify Jeff Hardy's failures, not his victories.
Jeff Small:FICTION. Oh come on, when has the WWE tried to send the right message to the kids since "Make a Difference" Fatu? The WWE is a business. They should promote one of their most popular stars' DVDs, especially before he gets placed in the slammer. They should also allow Punk to exaggerate his real-life beliefs to create his heel character. Which they are doing. No blame on the WWE here.
Score: 3 for 5
6. Hulk Hogan's recent media comments about being in charge of TNA, booking them without a writing team and Steve Austin ducking his challenge is not helping TNA at all.
Scott Slimmer:FICTION. There are two important details in the wording of this statement that ultimately make it fiction. First, the statement claims that Hogan's comments are not helping TNA "at all." While it is certainly debatable whether Hogan's comments are doing more harm than good, it's also very hard to argue that they have no benefits at all. For better or worse, Hulk Hogan and his recent comments have brought increased attention and media coverage to TNA. I have to believe that some new viewers will tune in to Impact when Hulk Hogan starts appearing on the show. Will those new viewers constitute a significant increase in Impact's rating? Maybe the will, maybe they won't. And will those new viewers continue to watch Impact once they see what it has to offer? Maybe they will, maybe they won't. And that's where the second important detail in the wording of this statement comes into play. This statement is about Hogan's "comments," not his actions. Ultimately, there's only so much good or harm that words alone can do to TNA. But when Hulk Hogan does finally arrive, it will be his actions that definitely show whether he is going to save the promotion or bury it. Will he really be in charge of TNA? Will he really be booking without a writing team? Will he really use TNA as a platform to goad Steve Austin into one last ill-advised match? It will be Hogan's actions and the answers to those questions, not Hogan's comments beforehand, that ultimately prove his worth to TNA.
Jeff Small:FICTION. What are you smoking, brother? Hulk Hogan didn't have to promote TNA while thrilling 50,000 Hulkamaniacs on his Hulkamania Tour. But he chose to. TNA should be thankful that Hogan is willing to resurrrect a dying brand. And if he decides to remove all writers to better the product, so be it. Hulk Hogan is a wrestling institution and should be revered in TNA. Remember kids, he slammed Andre the Giant at WrestleMania 3. What else needs to be done?
Score: 4 for 6
7. Rey Mysterio would be better served by not doing the "quick fix" surgery and waiting to come back until he's completely recovered.
Scott Slimmer:FACT. Rey Mysterio is one of the greatest little men in wrestling history, and I have no doubt that he loves performing for the fans. As such, my assumption would be that he wants to do whatever he can to give the fans as many memorable matches as possible. The number of injuries that Mysterio has sustained over the years, coupled with his trademark high-flying style, may give the impression Mysterio's days as an active in-ring competitor are numbered. This may very well be the mindset that Mysterio himself has adopted, and in that case I understand why he would want to have the "quick fix" surgery and get back into the ring as soon as possible. But it's also important to remember that Mysterio got into this business and made an impact at a very early age, and he's still only 34 years old even though he's been wrestling for twenty years. It's possible for today's top wrestlers to perform at a high level well into their early forties, and so under the best circumstances it may be possible for Mysterio wrestle for another full decade. In light of that timeframe, having the traditional surgery and taking a year off to fully heal doesn't seem like such a long time. And so on one side of the coin you have Mysterio rushing back to the ring before his body is ready and ultimately ending his career prematurely when the pile of injuries simply becomes too much to bear. On the other side of the coin you have Mysterio allowing himself to take a break, completely recover, and then continue to perform for his fans for years to come.
Jeff Small:FICTION. Rey's knees are shot and really with the style he works, how much of a shelf life does he have left? Let Mysterio take the quick fix surgery, come back and work a return program with Batista, enjoy a WrestleMania paycheck, and then see how his knee is holding up. Milk him for what he's worth as I can't see Rey making it to WrestleMania 30.
Score: 4 for 7
8. The Hornswoggle/DX mini-feud has been taken too far and needs to stop.
Scott Slimmer:FACT. I understand that professional wrestling is about more than just scripted athletic pseudo-competition, and I appreciate the value of entertainment in the televised product. However, I also believe that wrestling matches are still the single most important part of professional wrestling programming, and I believe that every non-wrestling segment should play a role in building toward an actual wrestling match. I have no problem with promos and interviews and contract signings and pre-match pep talks and skull punts to fathers and fathers-in-law. Hell, even raping a corpse can be used in the build to a title match. But entertainment segments used solely for the sake of entertainment are simply unnecessary, especially when the actual entertainment value of the segments is question is dubious at best. And that's precisely the case with the Hornswoggle / DX mini-feud. There is no chance (no chance in hell) that this feud is going to lead to a real match, and it is a waste of time for everyone involved. Yes, this feud seemed to be the main building block for the WWE Championship match at Survivor Series, and yet it played absolutely no role in that match. Now DX is theoretically engaged in a feud with Chris Jericho & Big Show for the Unified Tag Team Championships, and yet they're still embroiled in the Hornswoggle feud that no longer has any bearing whatsoever on their upcoming pay-per-view match. As the great American philosopher Susan Powter has said, "Stop the insanity!"
Jeff Small:FACT, at this moment. If all we are getting out of this mini-feud is a fifteen minute comedy skit next week, then yes this feud needs to stop. However, if this mini-feud leads to DX breaking up and Shawn Michaels receiving custody of Hornswoggle, then it might have been worth our time.
Final Score: 4 for 8
And after the dust has settled, Slimmer and Small split the difference. Thanks to the both of them for their answers, and to you the readers for clicking on the link and seeing what they had to say! That's all we have for this week…check us out next week for more 411 Wrestling Fact or Fiction!
Remember to go to TigerFlashGames.com and play addictive, free flash games when you're bored at work, school, or whenever! If I had any time at my work, you'd find me there all the damn time!
Sheamus is a great choice for Cena. This isn't a WM or anything. People need to quit bitching and just enjoy said product.
Posted By: Just (Guest) on December 02, 2009 at 11:05 PM
It is a shame we can't ever praise TNA for doing something 'smart'. I am not talking about pushing Wolfe or letting AJ-Joe-Daniels put on great matches becuase that doesn't mean anything. Four hours of iMPACT on a night when most (if not all) 'male' 18-34 year olds will be out partying. It just lacks intelligence on every level.
Posted By: Really? (Guest) on December 02, 2009 at 11:07 PM
To debate something is 'wrong' with WWE is just stupid. As long as WWE is making money at a crazy rate, how can 'we' of all people tell them that it's 'wrong'?
Posted By: IWC (Guest) on December 02, 2009 at 11:12 PM
i saw online vickie will run sd with teddy, as already was hinted at, and that eric is being released in april.
Posted By: report (Guest) on December 02, 2009 at 11:13 PM
WWE is Dying
Posted By: Guest#6484 (Guest) on December 02, 2009 at 11:19 PM
The Mini Feud with DX and hornswoggle is also one of the things that kills wrestling. For one it doenst make any sense. DX got upset because Hornswoggle was wearing some of their merchandise? Did they ever explain why DX got upset about it?
Posted By: Guest#3327 (Guest) on December 02, 2009 at 11:21 PM
'The Mini Feud with DX and hornswoggle is also one of the things that kills wrestling.'
actually, this is more correct than you realise. having DX run around like it is still 1999 and bitching about TNA's use of senior citizens, or decrying Hogan for his backstage politicking and not decrying HBK for doing the same thing, does just as much damage.
Posted By: Darth Mortis (Guest) on December 02, 2009 at 11:40 PM
My biggest gripe about Sheamus being number one contender is the fact that he has no chance in hell defeating Cena.Seeing that Cena is the "golden boy" I cant picture WWE actually making or having much balls doing such a move.If the e really wants to do something showing that their pushing a new stars I say let a guy like Kofi or Morrison or whoever is on fire around the time of the Rumble win the Rumble instead of someone established or a repeater.As much as I would like Edge winning needs someone who can benefit.
Posted By: The Gold Standard (Guest) on December 02, 2009 at 11:41 PM
I apologize to Slimmer and Small if I missed them trashing TNA for putting Desmond Wolf up against Kurt Angle...but If they didn't, then I gotta call bullshit.
How on earth is Sheamus not a fine choice for Cena, while the IWC could barely contain their boners for Wolf vs. Angle?
Posted By: Ronnie (Guest) on December 02, 2009 at 11:51 PM
It is a shame we can't ever praise TNA for doing something 'smart'. I am not talking about pushing Wolfe or letting AJ-Joe-Daniels put on great matches becuase that doesn't mean anything. Four hours of iMPACT on a night when most (if not all) 'male' 18-34 year olds will be out partying. It just lacks intelligence on every level.
Posted By: Really? (Guest) on December 02, 2009 at 11:07 PM
I think u give hardcore IWC fans too much credit. I would have figured the same thing when I saw a guy live at Raw sitting there watching Japanese wrestling on his Iphone 20 minutes before the show. I don't think ppl like him will be out partying.
Posted By: Bunkhouse Buck (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 12:13 AM
WWE is Dying
Posted By: Guest#6484 (Guest) on December 02, 2009 at 11:19 PM
Not really, I think Hogan has another target.
Posted By: Guest#5502 (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 12:20 AM
LOL you all are so concerned and upset... I watch TNA, they don't let me down. I only watch WWE if something worth watching is going on, which is rare. I'll be taking a look at Styles vs Daniels(a real wrestling match) you all go ahead and keep watching WWE, the company that frequently make dramatic changes at the expense of their fans, who complain, yet they still watch the bullshit anyway. The one change that rarely occurs is who is the title picture.
Posted By: Alex (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 12:23 AM
tlc isnt one of the main ppv of the year. the wwe is finally pushing someone new and everyone craps all over it. there use to be a time when the wwe champ face any and all challengers regardless of status in the company.
as for the wwe sending out the right message in terms of jeff hardy. lets not forget:
-kane rapes lita, then is turned inot a face.
-three stables are introduced-a hispanic stable, a black stable and an all white stable. who were the good guys?
this is nothing new with the wwe.
Posted By: rey (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 12:26 AM
Four hours of iMPACT on a night when most (if not all) 'male' 18-34 year olds will be out partying. It just lacks intelligence on every level.
Posted By: Really? (Guest) on December 02, 2009 at 11:07 PM
A lot of people will be partying at a house where there will be A TV in the backround, some will put on TNA and some people will watch a few minutes of Impact for the first time at these parties. I will be with trannies in Chelsea sniffing coke and insulting taxpayers, no Impact for me!
Posted By: Guest#5393 (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 12:37 AM
To me, Jeff Hardy vs CM Punk is all about what made classic Attitude. The audience embraces the flawed hero over the perfect heel. But WWE's concern isn't a grey feud, it's cash. And Hardy creates that.
Still, keep in mind WWE are CLEARY NOT saying it's ok to do drugs. They are only saying it's human to make mistakes. That is not the same as encouraging them. We heard the same thing with MVP about his stint in the pokey.
Posted By: Lobe (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 12:37 AM
Ive been trying my damnedest to Make a Difference since 1994
Posted By: Nick (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 12:40 AM
"I apologize to Slimmer and Small if I missed them trashing TNA for putting Desmond Wolf up against Kurt Angle...but If they didn't, then I gotta call bullshit.
How on earth is Sheamus not a fine choice for Cena, while the IWC could barely contain their boners for Wolf vs. Angle?"
Because Wolfe/Angle was not a World title feud. If Sheamus had started a feud with HHH, I doubt people would be bitching, but in kayfabe logic, the #1 contender for the World title is supposed to be in the upper upper upper echelon of competitors, the best of the best, and Sheamus is nowhere near that level.
Now, had he feuded with HHH first, and gotten a few wins over the course of that program, THEN he'd be a more legit choice to go after Cena, but let's be real, he's beaten Noble (jobber), Finlay (one step above a jobber at this point), and got a pin on Morrison (upper-midcarder) with a 3-on-1 advantage. He's never even been in the ring with a main eventer, let alone defeated one. Let's also keep in mind that the guy is not over. At all.
This is like that storyline from the "Smackdown: Here Comes The Pain" season mode, where the least qualified contender for the belt gets a title shot because it amuses Vince McMahon.
Posted By: Tom (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 12:57 AM
Is Sheamus James Hetfield?
Posted By: Clyde (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 12:58 AM
I really don't think we should look a gift horse in the mouth. No one should be complaining about Sheamus being Cena's challenger. We've all been begging for new guys in the title picture of RAW. We have one. He might not be totally ready but the guy is in tight with Hunter so for once the backstage politics are a good thing. Hunter won't let Sheamus get buried.
Also, can me naive if you want but the guy does have a chance of winning. The time between Survivor Series and Royal Rumble is typically when the WWE tries out new wrestlers in the main event picture because there is little risk. It's not quite time for the 'Mania build to begin and fans are watching less often in these months due to the holidays. Less long term damage can be done with a failed push. Heck, just look at Jeff Hardy and Edge won got their first tastes of World title gold in this time period before ultimately losing the titles at the Rumble. Sheamus winning the WWE title at TLC and dropping it at the Rumble isn't out of the realm of possibility.
Others may be more ready but Sheamus is still a talented guy so he deserves a chance. Also, saying that Kofi should be Cena's challenger is a worse idea. Yes, he's fresh but he's also insanely over. The first time he's in a WWE title match should be when he's going to win it at 'Mania since he's already a lock as a long term investment.
---
The WWE pushing Jeff's DVD is dumb. But there's nothing wrong with pushing Punk as a heel. I always sided with him against Hardy but here's the thing. Yes, his values are good but he presents them in a preacher, holier-than-thou (kinda like the IWC) way. Lots of people in the world have good ideas but no one tends to like them when they're pushed down their throats. Being straight edge is just one of these many good ideas. Punk is a beast on the mic and he's tearing it up in the ring so there's no reason to not continue the heel push. Believe me, sooner than later he'll turn face but still keep the straight edge thing at the forefront of his gimmick. Let the heel thing run it's course. Hell, it's already given potential to Festus who was on the short list for future endeavoring.
Posted By: Ron Mexico (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 01:11 AM
How on earth is Sheamus not a fine choice for Cena, while the IWC could barely contain their boners for Wolf vs. Angle?
Posted By: Ronnie (Guest) on December 02, 2009 at 11:51 PM
Because Wolf and Angle are good wrestlers, while Sheamus' only credential is being big and Cena is not a good enough wrestler to carry him
Posted By: Bloodied (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 01:12 AM
LOL you all are so concerned and upset... I watch WWE, they don't let me down. I only watch TNA if something worth watching is going on, which is rare. I'll be taking a look at TLC(a real wrestling PPV) you all go ahead and keep watching TNA, the company that frequently make dramatic changes at the expense of their fans, who complain, yet they still watch the bullshit anyway. The one change that rarely occurs is who is the main event. (WWE alums)
Posted By: xelA (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 01:14 AM
I apologize to Slimmer and Small if I missed them trashing TNA for putting Desmond Wolf up against Kurt Angle...but If they didn't, then I gotta call bullshit.
How on earth is Sheamus not a fine choice for Cena, while the IWC could barely contain their boners for Wolf vs. Angle?
Posted By: Ronnie (Guest) on December 02, 2009 at 11:51 PM
Well.. Angle wasn't the TNA World Champ, and we've all seen Wolfe wrestle before. Not in TNA of course but we're familiar with him. Sheamus is completely new to us and he's fighting for the Championship. I can see the difference.
I don't have a problem with Sheamus fighting for the belt though. It's not like he was just named the #1 Contender out of nowhere. He didn't come out and challenge Cena for the belt. He won his qualifying match, and won the battle royale. Those were the 'requirements'. It's obvious (or is it?) he's not going to win, but it gives Cena something new to do for a month or so.
Speaking of which.. I wonder if all of Raw's heels will come out and try to help Sheamus during the match. Maybe Sheamus will get a one night title reign.. Just maybe.........
Posted By: WMD (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 01:19 AM
To debate something is 'wrong' with WWE is just stupid. As long as WWE is making money at a crazy rate, how can 'we' of all people tell them that it's 'wrong'?
Posted By: IWC (Guest) on December 02, 2009 at 11:12 PM
I could go on a big ol' 2-3 paragraph rant on everything that is wrong with this mentality, but I just don't have the energy tonight, my friend. I just don't.
Posted By: mr. x (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 01:19 AM
Is Sheamus James Hetfield?
Posted By: Clyde (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 12:58 AM
This made me LOL.
and with THAT, i'm off to bed. thanks for the laugh =)
Posted By: tony touch (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 01:20 AM
You say Lashley hasn't been made to look like a total idiot yet? What do you call losing to Steiner in 2009?
I call it looking like a total idiot.
Besides, I rememeber reading online that Lashley's divison he was wrestling for was the X-Divison, not the Heavyweight division.
Posted By: COlumN (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 01:21 AM
And the Sheamus debate goes on...
I think what bugs me about the title shot is that Sheamus is really an unknown commodity.
We've seen the squashes on ECW and Raw, but he doesn't have a library of work in American indy feds like Nigel does. WWE is known for limiting new guys' movesets, so he may be better than we think.
I'll admit though, he does look like he could be a main event monster. And when you think about it, seeing a rookie come out of nowhere and dominate a sport is not all that far fetched. It happens in football, baseball, and lots of other sports.
Posted By: Guest#8804 (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 01:24 AM
When it really comes down to it, CM Punk is a heel, so anything he says basically makes everyone love Jeff Hardy even more. And seriously, if anything, WWE is HELPING Jeff Hardy's real life situation by having a dickhole bad guy promote the DVD.
Posted By: Kip (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 01:28 AM
so this whole column is run based on the fact that you guys think you're smarter bookers than whomsoever TNA and WWE have going for them?
That's a mighty fiction right there, mate.
Posted By: todd (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 01:54 AM
**********
To debate something is 'wrong' with WWE is just stupid. As long as WWE is making money at a crazy rate, how can 'we' of all people tell them that it's 'wrong'?
**********
Hmmm, let's see.
Oh yeah, we're THE ONES THAT WATCH THE PRODUCT. WWE wants us to give them our hard-earned dollars. WWE is not "making money at a crazy rate." That was during the Monday night wars. Back when the two Monday night shows combined could draw a 10 share. Now WWE can't even draw half of that. Why not? Answer - because Vince has completely fucked up his product. Think of it... if Vince could pull his head out of his ass and go back to so many of the things that made that era great, he could then actually make money "at a crazy rate."
Posted By: Scott B (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 02:20 AM
You say Lashley hasn't been made to look like a total idiot yet? What do you call losing to Steiner in 2009?
I call it looking like a total idiot.
Besides, I rememeber reading online that Lashley's divison he was wrestling for was the X-Divison, not the Heavyweight division.
Posted By: COlumN (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 01:21 AM
Nope, he is in the heavyweight division.
Posted By: Guest#0631 (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 02:25 AM
How on earth is Sheamus not a fine choice for Cena, while the IWC could barely contain their boners for Wolf vs. Angle?
Posted By: Ronnie (Guest) on December 02, 2009 at 11:51 PM
Sheamus has yet to prove that he's half the wrestler Nigel/Wolf is. We already know Cena isn't half the wrestler Angle is. And the Angle/Wolf feud wasn't about a World Title, but rather about taking one of the best talents outside of the "major leagues" in the business and making sure he debuted at a status that fit his ability. (As a side note: Think WWE's going to be half as good to Bryan Danielson when he debuts?)
I'll be the first to apologize to Sheamus if it turns out he really is that good. But this decision would be a lot less dubious if any of us had any reason to actually BELIEVE he is, rather than just skeptically hope for the best.
Posted By: Bruce L (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 02:28 AM
I understand peoples in north americas complaints about shamus as he has not wrestled for ROH or any of the big american indy promotions. Shamus however has been a very prominant wrestling figure in his native ireland for the better part of the decade. Wrestling under the name Sheamus O'Shaunessy he was the IWW (Irish Whip Wrestling) world champion twice Defeating incredible british wrestler Darren Burridge and Vamnpiro he was also the first non english wrestler to win FWA gold. I understand how all this means nothing or at least very litte to american wrestling fans but they shoud know that Shamus when given a chance to be is a very tallented and solid big man wrestler who has speed and agility that he has not been able to showcase in the WWE yet. So for anyone concerned that Shamus cannot put on a good enough main event he can and he has.
Posted By: awindos (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 02:31 AM
"TNA should be thankful that Hogan is willing to resurrrect a dying brand."
A dying brand? Really? What exactly about TNA is 'dying'? I don't understand. Has their financial backing suddenly disappeared? Has their ratings and PPV buys suddenly plummeted? If anything, TNA is a very consistent brand. Now, if you were to say that TNA should be thankful that Hogan is willing to come and further expand an established brand, that would be one thing. But what you have written is the most asinine thing in this entire article.
And everyone needs to lighten up on the DX vs Hornswoggle thing. It isn't the end of the world, and it won't last forever. Just enjoy it. You might even get a laugh or two out of it.
Posted By: Guest#3140 (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 02:39 AM
I was bored so I decided to answer along this week :)
#1 - FACT: Slimmer did you forget he also beat Finlay and won a Battle Royal by eliminating half of the competitors? True Sheamus is new and unproven, but that was the idea. Think of it this way, it also improves the Royal Rumble in the normal fans eyes because ANYONE could win it.
#2 - FACT: Slimmer got it right here, 4 hours of continuous wrestling is just too much. Even Wrestlemania goes just under 4 hours. It's basically just going to be a normal 2-hour Impact with an extra 2 hours of highlights thrown in. That's how I see it anyways.
#3 - FACT: Escobar is one of those guys who needs a mouthpiece, otherwise he's Vladimir Kozlov with less moves, less charisma (that's right), and a lame catchphrase. Under Guerrero he could have at least gotten some experience.
#4 - FACT: Sure why not, he was treated as a big deal when he came in to TNA so it's good to give him a title program.
#5 - FICTION: It's exactly in line with CM Punk's character. I don't think kids are cheering for drugs and booing a clean lifestyle here, Punk gets heat because of his high-and-mighty attitude.
#6 - FICTION: It got TNA some attention, so that's a good thing. However if these things are true, it will be something to see what happens in the future for TNA.
#7 - FICTION: Is he even getting the surgery at all now? Rey's pretty much on his last legs (literally), so I guess do what you can while you can for your fans.
#8 - FACT: I'm usually all for entertainment in wrestling but I just don't find Hornswoggle entertaining. Any feud he could be in right now would have been going on too long and too far.
Posted By: King Tony (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 03:17 AM
1. I completely agree with Slimmer on the topic of Sheamus.
2. 4 Hours of Impact (or any wrestling show for that matter) is overkill when watching it on tv. The only excuse i can think of is that TNA is making up for the lost time of being preempted the week before.
I hate when the people answering the question dissect every word of the question and try to spin it into an answer that they know in their heart of hearts is wrong. Hulk Hogan's comments are not favorable for TNA at this point. Him promoting TNA may be favorable, but him saying that he's gonna take full control of the company, throw away comedy the writers (again i ask 'what comedy writers'), and convince Steve Austin to join TNA only makes him look like a fool and TNA look desperate. With all the stuff that he's saying, he's making TNA sound like it doesn't have any redeeming qualities about itself. He's making the company look bad. And so help me God if any of what he's saying turns out to be true....At this stage, when we have Russo and Ferrera doing a bang up job of making me passionate about this company again. I can't remember the last time ordered 4 TNA ppvs in a row (05 maybe). We have great wrestling angles, fresh talent being pushed, none of the horrible comedy, over-scripting and celebrity guest host gaga that we see on Raw. TNA is the best its been in some 4 years, and for Hogan to come in and turn the company on its ear and ruin that, I simply can't support that, brother.
Posted By: bighustle (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 05:43 AM
Because Wolf and Angle are good wrestlers, while Sheamus' only credential is being big and Cena is not a good enough wrestler to carry him
Posted By: Bloodied (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 01:12 AM
_________________________________
I seem to remember people saying the same thing about Cena/Umaga...and they had a series of very good matches.
And to the guy who made the comment about nothing being wrong in the minds of the WWE because they are making money...I think you're right. I compare it to a movie studio. I'd rather make a mediocre summer blockbuster that makes major bank than a critically acclaimed film that makes me no money. The IWC asks how Vince sleeps at night knowing he's not giving us what we want. His answer? On a bed full of cash.
Posted By: MasterShake (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 06:08 AM
"I'll be taking a look at TLC(a real wrestling PPV"
Pfft-hahahahahaha I know what you we're tyring to do there, but you lost all credibility with that. EPIC FAIL!!!
Posted By: Kids these days (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 06:40 AM
The simplest way for the WWE to make peace with the problem of pushing the sXe character as a heel would be to have someone come out as a face & talk about the virtues of legal substances like alcohol in moderation for those of age. If there were still characters who drank beer, that would be way easier. Punk would just come off as an asshole with a point.
Posted By: ElmoMachete (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 06:54 AM
You see with Sheamus everyone is going "be happy, they're pushing someone new." That's the thing - they aren't. This is a push. He's being straight up fed to Cena which will do him more harm than good. The events of Raw confirmed that when Sheamus just walked away like a chickenshit. I mean what do they intend Sheamus to be? Is he the Brock Lesnar to Cena's Hogan? Wherein he will decimate Cena and (hopefully, since on his PALE skin it would look awesome visually) paint his torso with Cena's blood?
Or...is Sheamus just another Umaga-come-lately that's going to crush some jobbers, and eat an FU every time out against Cena, before fading into obscurity and endeavors?
Here's the problem, it's lose/lose. If Sheamus wins, then Cena does the rematch thing and beats him for the belt while people continue to not care about Sheamus since he's still so new to them. If Cena wins...we get nothing. Sheamus is dead in the water for a good long while and Cena goes back to switching between Orton and Trips for a solid year.
That's my problem with it.
As for the CM Punk debate
"Still, keep in mind WWE are CLEARY NOT saying it's ok to do drugs. They are only saying it's human to make mistakes. That is not the same as encouraging them. We heard the same thing with MVP about his stint in the pokey.
Posted By: Lobe (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 12:37 AM"
Did you miss when he was on ECW and Tiffany told Punk to "be human" and Christian called him a nerd? This is the thing, it's not Punk's beliefs that are wrong it's the way he expresses them. That's what the faces should be attacking. They should be calling him preachy, telling him people are free to make a choice and he's lost sight of that. Not making it look like drinking, smoking and goodness knows what are the normal thing to do and if you don't, you're uncool like Punk.
Posted By: Ravenite (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 07:05 AM
"WWE is Dying."
I will tell you the same thing I tell every other ignorant, arrogant fanboy who says that: BULLSHIT.
Will you still be saying that when Wrestlemania 40 comes to MSG in 15 years? Because that is what is going to happen.
Posted By: Guest#1630 (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 08:03 AM
Oh shut up you tarts!!
"the crowd was behind Kofi and ready to see him elevated to the top of the card."
Yeah, they cheer him because he's the most poular guy in the #1 contenders match, but when he gets to the main event, and has to go head to head with Cena for fan support, it could kill his momentum dead. But a match with Orton is guaranteed to help him become a bigger star.
"He's perfect for a main event feud at Final Resolution."
But the question asked about AFTER Final Resolution. Not AT, AFTER.
"No blame on the WWE here."
Nobody is blaming them for trying to make money, but the question asked if the company was setting a bad example for kids, not if setting a bad example for kids is OK.
Posted By: Del Boy (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 08:04 AM
Sheamus would be fine, if the champ was someone better than Cena... He should be upper mid-card at best, he cant carry the interest in a feud alone. He isnt hogan, the rock, or stone cold steve austin... not even close.
Posted By: kevin (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 08:18 AM
I'm sorry... didn't Sheamus beat Finlay, Kofi Kingston, Sheamus, R-Truth, Montel Vontavious Porter, Mark Henry, Randy Orton, Ted Dibiase, & Cody Rhodes all in the same night? Swagger? R-Truth? Please.
Complaint if they do something; complaint if they don't. The problem is really that they went with HHH's boy, not the IWC's boy.
They decidd to push someone that had never been champion before. Everyone is all up in arms. Who would have been better? Kofi? Feuding with Orton. Legacy? As Cena said after the last PPV, "ENOUGH!".
Posted By: J. Alexander Mitchell (Registered) on December 03, 2009 at 08:53 AM
so these guys piss and moan when its Cena vs. Orton; Cena vs. HHH; Cena vs. Big Show, etc. for the 8 millionth time and DEMAND for some new, fresh challengers and a different set of opponents for a change...
...and when it finally happens, they piss and moan because its not the opponent THEY had in mind. look - dude won a battle royal, and as a result gets a title shot. it's something different, its a new match, a new opponent, and a fresh face...enjoy it. this will make Sheamus look better, win or lose.
Posted By: John B Hopkins (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 08:54 AM
Sheamus vs Cena is booking 101. You bring in a big, tough looking guy, have him smack around a few jobbers so he looks like a monster and then feed him to the champ. It's how virtually every Lawler fued in Memphis ws booked.
And if Cena can carry Khazi (sic, look it up) to a watchable match, he can carry The Irish Curse.
I just dread them fueding Sheamus and Drew McIntyre (search for Sheamus O'Shaunessey vs Drew Galloway on youtube, I think there's still some of their IWW matches up)
Posted By: BlueMeanieUK (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 09:02 AM
99% of these idiots complaining about Sheamus being in the match with Cena had no intention of buying the pay-per-view anyway no matter who Cena's opponent was, so their opinion is irrelevant, of course they will watch it through illegal means then bitch about it anyway, that's what the internet has done to wrestling.
Posted By: Guest#5233 (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 09:06 AM
1. Fact - for me, I want to see if John Cena can carry a relatively green wrestler to a good match on the big stage. For the past few years, the only "new" guy Cena has worked against was The Miz, and that kind of fizzled. If Cena is going to continue to be "The Face" of WWE, let's see if he has the capability of elevating new talent (just like guys like Angle and HHH elevated Cena when he first started).
2. Fact - 4 hours of any entertainment programming is too much. But fortunately for TNA and Spike, they probably aren't counting on people tuning in for the entire 4 hours. Rather, people will be flipping through the channels, will see some wrestling, and stop for a few minutes to see what's on. So for TNA, it will be very important that the product being shown at any time is higher quality. They can't be putting squash matches or stupid skits on TV that night - it has to be "best of" matches from TV AND PPV and new matches or higher quality "live" matches to retain and build viewership.
3. Fiction: I don't think Escobar was getting anywhere with Vickie - it was simply to reintroduce Vickie into the equation. She's now back, so let's see what they guy can do on his own. Maybe he's a Kofi-in-waiting and can deliver better than expected promos. If not - they haven't invested too much in the guy.
4. Fact - now that he's been beaten, it actually sets up well for his next opponent since he isn't the unbeatable monster and there will be some doubt as to who will win the matchup. Had he continued with his unbeaten streak - I would be less interested because I'm not a fan of the unbeaten streak since Goldberg ruined it for everyone else.
5. Fact - since when does the WWE try to set the right image for kids? This PG push isn't marketing to kids - it's marketing to parents to make them think the WWE product is "safe" for their kids to watch. The kids will watch whether the product is PG or not - its whether the parents let the kids watch the show and but he merchandise.
6. Fiction - TNA needs publicity, Hogan delivers publicity. Where Hogan will ultimately hurt TNA is if he turns it into WCW 2010, bringing in all of his old cronies and rehashing the NWO storyline. But for now - this is only helping TNA.
7. Fact - the question is whether he wants to have a short term payday at the expense of a long term future (which will be in AAA-type promotions). Rey doesn't need to be Rey-1999 anymore - but he still needs to be at least partially mobile if he wants to be the face of Mexican wrestling after his WWE days are done.
8. Fact. Yes - it was a nice "little" distraction for DX, helped them do a few comedy sketches, but I'm over it. And the writing staff seems to be over it as well given they ditched the skit this past week.
Posted By: SpankyHamm (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 09:30 AM
Sorry Small, I gotta go with Slimmer on this one. How can you make the guy, who in real life is doing everything right by leading a clean life style a villian, and a guy who clearly can't overcome addictions to drugs a hero. Yes, I understand that wrestling is fake, and in 1998, this may have been okay, do to having older fans. But now that WWE has gone "PG" and is aiming it's shows at kids(again), glorifing Hardy's lifestyle is NOT the way to go. Even if, somehow, Hardy doesn't get charged with anything, it still looks like he has serious problems that the WWE is glorifying and that is unacceptable with children.
Posted By: JWestmoreland (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 09:32 AM
The IWC can't complain loud enough about how the WWE main event has gone stale, and they're sick of seeing the same people at the top of the card all the time. Then when WWE brings someone new to the top and tries something different, the IWC switches gears completely and says "He's not ready! It's not his time yet!" It just makes it look like you guys will find faults with everything.
Posted By: Guest#4447 (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 10:26 AM
And the Sheamus debate goes on...
I think what bugs me about the title shot is that Sheamus is really an unknown commodity.
We've seen the squashes on ECW and Raw, but he doesn't have a library of work in American indy feds like Nigel does. WWE is known for limiting new guys' movesets, so he may be better than we think.
I'll admit though, he does look like he could be a main event monster. And when you think about it, seeing a rookie come out of nowhere and dominate a sport is not all that far fetched. It happens in football, baseball, and lots of other sports.
Posted By: Guest#8804 (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 01:24 AM
See Brock Lesner. Not that I'm comparing the two by any stretch of the imagination, but Brock debuted shortly after WM in 2002 and four months later was champ.
Is Sheamus James Hetfield?
Posted By: Clyde (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 12:58 AM
If Sheamus cuts a promo on Raw in his Irish accent Monday night, and then suddenly adds a "yeah yeah" at the end, he will become my favorite wrestler of all time.
Posted By: epic50 (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 10:59 AM
The Sheamus push is a couple months too fast, thats the only problem. If he was on Raw for say 4 months instead of 2, it would have been fine. Jack Swagger is far too goofy looking to be taken seriously right now. His look reminds me of a young Edge, very awkward looking.
TNA has become more much watchable over the past month. I dont think they still do the 10 min match limit which is a big improvement. I'm hoping Daniels wins but I dobut that and this will probably be his last main event feud. Hes a small old man, 38 years old.
CM Punk's current promo still is like a boring Jericho promo. I still watch it but it is quite dull and often too long.
Posted By: Guest#4555 (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 11:04 AM
Its only a December ppv so having Sheamus in the wwe title match isnt a bad idea, tho i agree he could of done with been build up a little longer.
With regards Punk, while its a bit of a grey area when you have a heel talking about how drugs & Alcohol are wrong & getting booed, the point is hes been such a dick about how that makes him better then everyone else that it works.
Posted By: jbardo (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 11:07 AM
It's obvious (or is it?) he's not going to win, but it gives Cena something new to do for a month or so...
Posted By: WMD (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 01:19 AM
Yes, it is in fact obvious. And, right or wrong, this is normal WWE behavior, in regards to the Hardy/Punk point. When the PTC's smear campaign caused them to lose advertisers, WWE did the same thing with the Stevie Richards ran Right To Censor. It was probably worse back then, but WWE (read: Vince) always has a way of flipping real-life situations like that in the product.
Posted By: ThePants (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 11:28 AM
" I also believe that wrestling matches are still the single most important part of professional wrestling programming, and I believe that every non-wrestling segment should play a role in building toward an actual wrestling match." - Slimmer
Tell that to the millions of people who made the Rock-Foley "This is Your Life" segment (which lasted 30 minutes and never led to a match) the most watched segment in the history of RAW.
Posted By: JP (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 11:53 AM
As much as i dont like the stupid back stage stuff with DX. (and i never did) my 4 yr old watches with me sometimes, and when he sees Hornswoggle he laughs and dances around like him. So in a couple years when he starts to get into the wrestling part more, and the WWE comes to town he's going to be asking to go...and isnt that the point of it all? to make new fans and make more money and get families out to the shows more. Not every part of the show can be for 'us'. I'm pretty sure my dad wasnt into watching George 'the animal' Steele eating the turnbuckle when he took me to a show when i was in Gr 6
Posted By: Huh (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 12:00 PM
Hornswoggle is right there with Katie Vick as "things that should've never happened".
Posted By: Guest#9007 (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 12:00 PM
I can't believe nobody has posted this yet
Small > Slimmer
Posted By: Matthew M (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 12:12 PM
In best Dave Chappelle voice: "He slammed Andre. Andre." He's the reason why most of us under the age of 35 actually even WATCH wrestling. He's Hulk Hogan!
Posted By: Joulz Il (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 12:27 PM
that could possibly be the dumbest logic I have heard spoken
Posted By: nic (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 12:39 PM
To debate something is 'wrong' with WWE is just stupid. As long as WWE is making money at a crazy rate, how can 'we' of all people tell them that it's 'wrong'?
Posted By: IWC (Guest) on December 02, 2009 at 11:12 PM
I think I may be a lil dumber for having to read that
Posted By: nic (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 12:39 PM
'Why not? Answer - because Vince has completely fucked up his product. Think of it... if Vince could pull his head out of his ass and go back to so many of the things that made that era great, he could then actually make money "at a crazy rate."'
which things that made that era great?
the swearing? the bra and panties matches that everyone hated then (but praise now) or the fact that every match had to have an overbooked ending?
was it the repeatitive and annoying hardcore matches? all the blading? seriously, outside of the Rock and Austin (neither of whom will be back in ring,) The Undertaker (who still puts asses in seats) and DX (who have overstayed their welcome by about 5 years and counting now) what is so different?
oh, right...instead of SuperCena, we had the Bionic Redneck.
gotcha
Posted By: Darth Mortis (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 12:59 PM
"I apologize to Slimmer and Small if I missed them trashing TNA for putting Desmond Wolf up against Kurt Angle...but If they didn't, then I gotta call bullshit.
How on earth is Sheamus not a fine choice for Cena, while the IWC could barely contain their boners for Wolf vs. Angle? "
Wolfe wasn't wrestling for a title, and he came in and for week after week he got the upper hand. Angle wanted revenge. Shameus has done nothing but beat up jobbers, and we are supposed to think SuperCena will lose?
Posted By: Brian (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 01:00 PM
The IWC can't complain loud enough about how the WWE main event has gone stale, and they're sick of seeing the same people at the top of the card all the time. Then when WWE brings someone new to the top and tries something different, the IWC switches gears completely and says "He's not ready! It's not his time yet!" It just makes it look like you guys will find faults with everything.
Posted By: Guest#4447 (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 10:26 AM
I think the problem is that Sheamus is being set up to fail. And when he does, the people in charge at WWE can point at it and say "THAT is why we need to keep the same people at the top, people that we're comfortable with".
Posted By: Some Guest (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 01:24 PM
I agree that Swagger would have been a better choice than Sheamus. They should have kept the 'streak' going and had a title vs streak one-off match at TLC, before properly building the next big feud with whoever they wanted. Unfortunately, WWE stupidly ended the streak at the exact time that they needed a new number 1 contender, and now Swagger has been buried. I don't actually remember seeing him on Raw since that loss.
Also, don't say that Swagger was ineligible because he's been a 'world champion' before, because Mark Henry has also been ECW champ and he was in the tournament.
Sheamus may end up being a great wrestler someday, but at the moment he's simply not ready. Swagger has proven in his matches with Cena, Christian and Hardy that he is capable of working at the level that would have been required of him at TLC. Sheamus has not shown that yet. Swagger had a winning streak going, he's fought for the US title, so there are many kayfabe reasons why he is a legitimate threat. Sheamus hasn't been built up as a legitimate challenger in any way as far as Raw is concerned.
Let's face facts- The only reason Sheamus got in is because Triple H is backing him.
Posted By: Guy (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 01:27 PM
Is there an address where I can send Sheamu a gift certificate to a tanning salon?
Posted By: Chico (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 02:13 PM
WWE needs to do opinions polls or screen their shows to a select audience before showing them to the general public, to gauge what people want to see. They need to get a broader perspective of what people want instead of staying cloistered amongst themselves and not getting any outside opinions.
Posted By: Chico (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 02:19 PM
"Also, don't say that Swagger was ineligible because he's been a 'world champion' before, because Mark Henry has also been ECW champ and he was in the tournament."
The ECW title isn't a world belt.
Posted By: noob (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 02:43 PM
Anyone remember John Cena fighting Brock when he was a hip hop of a thug?
Posted By: Dudester (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 03:23 PM
Wow, I never thought it possible. But Vern Troyer is actually about the size of Hornswoggles foot.
Posted By: chewb (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 03:25 PM
I don't think the wrong message is being sent with Punk. They're not saying people who are straight edge are bad. They're saying that preachy, arrogant, cheating pricks who happen to be straight edge are assholes. Him being straight edge is just a vehicle for him to be able to look down on everyone and be even more of an asshole.
As for the Hardy dvd, meh. They're promoting his career and matches, not his lifestyle choices. Yeah, the two sorta link together sometimes but I don't think there's any message there that this somehow promotes drugs.
Posted By: Guest#3191 (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 04:09 PM
Like one of the reviewers said a couple weeks ago, maybe this DX/Hornswoggle feud leads to HBK vs. Swoggle at WM 26. I bet someway Shawn could get at least a *** 1/2 match out of him.
Posted By: DJ (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 06:44 PM
WWE 2009 = running out of fresh material because pushing young talent is soo 1999 and keeping the older generation in the spotlight is cool, yay! Also the creative team needs to have Cena a heel and have UT retired by fresh talent, sorry CM Punk creative control ended that at HITC. WWE is just not cool anymore unless there is a management reboot of the creative team variety.
Posted By: Guest#8340 (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 07:26 PM
"I don't think the wrong message is being sent with Punk. They're not saying people who are straight edge are bad. They're saying that preachy, arrogant, cheating pricks who happen to be straight edge are assholes. Him being straight edge is just a vehicle for him to be able to look down on everyone and be even more of an asshole."
But again, the faces aren't attacking the way he promotes his beliefs but his beliefs themselves. They make out that because he chooses not to drink and smoke and what not, that makes him abnormal. And it's disturbing because you know how impressionable kids are and how they are susceptible to peer pressure.
Remember when JBL cut that promo on Punk basically calling him a loser because he didn't drink? It's the same except it's Christian and R-Truth who are doing the name calling.
Posted By: Ravenite (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 08:19 PM
1) Fact. Its still too early for Kofi, they lost confidence in Swagger and really there's no one else. But, Cena is great at putting on matches with bad ass motherf***ers, so eh.
2) Fact. Two hours of impact is unwatchable. 4 is like something they'd do at Abu Ghraib.
3) Fact. I can see the potential in Escobar, but I think he could use the residual heat from Vickie for like 6 more months.
4) Fiction. Lashley might make a good match, but he can't hold up his end on promos to make a decent feud.
5) Fiction. Punk is at his best when he twists his straight edge lifestyle into being a judgemental prick. Hardy=$. I can see why people think the two will be forever linked, but Punk will draw money as a dick heel, and Jeff will move merchandise because he's Jeff. Its business, live with it.
6) Fact. Hogan being Hogan makes people role their eyes, not buy tickets. Period.
7) Fiction. Rey's career is over. He can still put on entertaining matches, but his body can't take it. I agree, get your Wrestlemania payday, call it a career, and get ready for your Hall of Fame induction.
8) Fiction. Hornswoggle is not funny. Pretty much any dwarf could do that role. But D-X has somehow made it work. Truth is, these segments have been entertaining, which is more than you can usually say about Hornswoggle. Just think about who he could be turning into a complete joke if he wasn't involved with D-X. I still weep for Chavo.
Posted By: black hole of charisma (Guest) on December 03, 2009 at 09:39 PM
1) Fact: See Meethinks on my thoughts
2) Fact: Four hours of Wrestling....zzzz
3) Fiction: Tag him with Jackson from ECW, make him the mouthpiece, call them the The Easy Ezz--go for the Tag Titles. Fire Vicki G's DumbAss please.
4) Fact: I think the Boss can go with anyone (TNA wants to thank Vinny Mac for this one)
5) Fiction: This is a business and they need to sell this DVD now before Jeff Hardy makes his own Hell in the Cell DVD in prison, and goes on Celebrity Rehab with Dr. Drew.
6) Fiction: Hogan is doing a fine job getting all to pay attention to TNA. He is enjoying screwing with the minds of Vince and the IWC, After all he is the Hulkstir (at least that is what his DVD says)
7) Fact: Take the time off and heal, come back, win the Rumble in 2011 and win back the world title Essa.
8) Fact: How ironic that you used the word "mini" for the question about Hornswaggle. The feud sucks, DX looks like HSN on crack with their shirts and hats (I am wanting for the 1-800 to pop up on the latest merchandise that they are trying to sell...lol), and we will have the "Little People's Court" next week on RAW which will take up one hour of show time. Thank God Chavo is not apart of this yet....or did I speak too soon.
Posted By: Mr. KT (Guest) on December 04, 2009 at 12:49 PM