Ask 411 Wrestling 12.23.09: Sting and Sting, Christmas Moments, Tribute To The Troops, WWE PPV Sets, More
Posted by Ryan Byers on 12.23.2009
Has there ever been drama between Sting the wrestler and Sting the singer? Who is the oldest guy to win a world title? Does WWE save PPV sets? What is your favorite Christmas wrestling moment? Get the answers to these questions and more in the latest edition of Ask 411!
Welcome, my friends, to Ask 411 Wrestling. I am Ryan Byers, and your regular host, Matthew Sforcina, is out of commission due to the holidays and related issues. Fortunately for him and for all of you, I'm getting to be an old pro at this, so get back and enjoy as I tackle all of your various inquiries about the world of professional wrestling.
Because of the time of year, I am contractually obligated to answer these questions from Father Christmas. Sort of odd one of the few non-Christian 411 writers winds up having to tackle the Christmas questions, eh? Happy Holidays!
1) With "Santa" wrestling for the major promotions in a least one match every year, I was wondering if he has ever won a match. I don't mean where a normal wrestler is just wearing the suit like Bubba Ray as Santa Dudley a few years ago, I mean a guy who is billed as just Santa Claus.
I couldn't think of any off the top of my head, and my subsequent research only turned up one time that this has happened. Of course, the majority of the times that "Santa" has appeared in professional wrestling, he has ultimately been revealed to be some member of the roster of the promotion in which he is appearing. If you think about it, this makes the most sense, as having a guy who is not going to be a regular part of your promotion beat somebody who IS a regular part of your promotion accomplishes nothing, as it takes the regular roster member down a peg without the compensation of moving anybody else up the pecking order. Even in most of the instances in which Santa has lost, he has ultimately been revealed to be a wrestler in disguise, though there was one notable exception to that rule when Kurt Angle made an unidentified Santa tap out to the ankle lock in a twenty-seven second long "match" at WWE's 2004 Armageddon pay per view.
. . . but what about the one instance in which an unidentified Santa has WON an encounter in the squared circle? Per my digging around, it took place on December 4, 1994 in Tokyo, Japan for Genichiro Tenryu's promotion W.A.R. The match involved not just one Santa but rather two of them, as the tag team of Masao Orihara and Nobukazu Harai were defeated by the team of Santa Claus #1 and Santa Claus #2, with Harai eating the pinfall. No, I don't know who he pissed off that particular Christmas season.
2) On the opposite side of things, has anyone wrestling under their normal gimmick ever won a championship whilst wearing a Santa suit?
To the best of my knowledge, no. Again, this makes sense if you think about it for a little while. In recent history, the Christmas season has been notoriously slow for professional wrestling, as major shows and therefore major events like title changes seemingly go on hiatus immediately before and after X-Mas, i.e. the shows on which you are most likely to see a grappler donning the floppy hat and beard of the jolly old elf.
Twenty or thirty years ago, major wrestling events and therefore things like title changes actually DID take place on Christmas Eve and Christmas Day, but, during that period of time, championships were taken much more seriously than they are in the modern era, so the odds of seeing a title match mixed in with something as goofy as a wrestler wearing St. Nick's garb were significantly lower than they are today.
3) I loved Xanta Claus when he was in the WWF in 1996. Was there ever any pay-off to the angle? I can't remember any kind of ending . . . he just seemed to stop turning up.
For those of you who do not know the story behind Father Christmas' question, at the fifth installment of the WWF's "In Your House" pay per view series, which emanated from Hershey, Pennsylvania, babyface wrestler Savio Vega was attacked by Santa Claus. It was revealed that the attack was orchestrated by "The Million Dollar Man" Ted DiBiase, though the man that he had attacked Vega was not actually Santa Claus. Instead, it was "Xanta Klaus," an evil Santa doppelganger who hailed from the South Pole and took presents away from children instead of giving them out.
Xanta wrestled only a handful of matches on WWF television, including one bout that aired on the December 19, 1995 edition of WWF Superstars in which he wrestled a young Scott Taylor, who would go on to more fame a few years later under the name Scotty II Hotty. There was never a formal end to the character. Xanta Klaus was never written out of storylines, and he never even had the match that everybody figured he would have had against Savio Vega. He just disappeared.
The man who played the Xanta Klaus character was none other than Balls Mahoney, who, after vanishing from the company in early 1996, would not be a contracted WWE wrestler again until 2006, when he signed as a part of the E's full-time relaunch of ECW.
4) Are the "Tribute to the Troops" shows considered canon or non-canon?
I don't think terms like "canon" apply to professional wrestling generally speaking. You're not going to get a bunch of wrestling fans to watch something on television and pretend that it didn't happen the next week when they're watching the exact same group of wrestlers in the exact same promotion. However, even if you disagree and think that these terms do apply to pro graps, I would think that you have to consider the goings on at the WWE Tribute to the Troops shows as canonical. Even though those shows are generally light on angle advancement, in the few instances in which plots have been furthered on a Tribute show, they have been referenced on subsequent programs. Perhaps the most notable example of this was when a U.S. solider became the first victor in Chris Masters' Masterlock challenge on the 2006 version of the show. That incident was referenced on subsequent episodes of Monday Night Raw, and the Masterlock was no longer considered to have never been escaped.
5) Glenn Jacobs (Kane, Fake Diesel, Isaac Yankem) wrestled as the Christmas Creature for a while in Memphis, I believe. How far up the card was he and how long was the character used for?
The Christmas Creature was a very short-lived character, and I believe that it was designed to be that way from the beginning. The Memphis territory in the early 1990's was somewhat infamous for bringing in over the top, "monster" style heels to feud with their top babyfaces, and he was just another name on the long list of creatures that was coming in to torment the do-gooders of the United States Wrestling Alliance.
In total, the Christmas Creature's professional wrestling career lasted less than a month. However, he was fairly high up on the card, as he immediately feuded with Jerry Lawler and went up against him for the USWA Heavyweight Title in the main event of a December 28, 1992 show. The Creature's mask was also in the line in that bout, and Lawler was able to defeat him in order to retain the belt and put the Christmas Creature gimmick to bed forever. Less than a year later, Glen Jacobs would be back in USWA wrestling under the name Doomsday and later Unabomb.
6) There's been loads of Santas and elves (women usually) over the years in wrestling, but I was wondering if there have been any wrestling snowmen (frosty style . . . not abominable) or wrestling reindeer?
I am not aware of anybody dressing up as a snowman in the wrestling ring. There was a wrestler named the Snowman, who primarily competed in the mid-1980's in Bill Watts' Mid-South territory. He was brought into the company to be a replacement for the Junkyard Dog as the company's top African American babyface, but he never caught on with the fans as well as JYD did and quickly faded into relative obscurity, coming back in 1990 to the USWA to feud with Jerry Lawler over that company's heavyweight title. (What is it with all of the USWA tie-ins in this column?) Of course, the Snowman's gimmick was not that he was a snowman . . . he was just a fellow who adopted that nickname.
There have been at least two instances in which wrestling personalities have dressed as reindeer. The more recent of the two was Tony Atlas slapping on the antlers and Rudolph nose on the December 17, 2008 edition of ECW on Sci-Fi, which complimented the Santa suit that his protege Mark Henry was wearing. Going back eleven years, another reindeer suit-donner (Get it?) was none other than Rena "Sable" Mero. On a December 11, 1997 WWF show from Lowell, Massachusetts, Marc Mero was wrestling Scott Taylor. (What is it with all of the Scott Taylor tie-ins in this column?) At the time, Marc was, in storyline, sick of being in his girl's shadow and therefore preventing her from showing off what made her a big star. As a result, he made her dress as a baggy reindeer suit while he valeted her instead of something more revealing. After the match, Mero's then-rival Tom Brandi attacked him, allowing Sable to strip down to her underthings to the delight of the crowd.
7) Finally, what is your favorite Christmas wrestling moment?
My favorite Christmas moment in the history of professional wrestling took place on the December 22, 2000 edition of Monday Night Raw. At the time, Kurt Angle was the WWF Champion, and he was joined by his Team ECK partners Edge and Christian as well as Stephanie McMahon to bring season's greetings to the fans of the Federation. And what would Christmas be without a little bit of family bonding? Kurt quickly brought out all of his male siblings and one cousin, all dressed in identical track suits. Accompanied by E&C on kazoos, they caroled for the crowd until Chris Jericho interrupted and challenged Angle, Edge, and Christian to a match which wound up being a six man tag also involving the Dudley Boys. Heck, let's take a look at a version of the story which is a little bit more YouTubular:
The match would ultimately see Kurt's brother Eric take a bump through a table courtesy of the Dudleys. It made sense at the time, given that Eric was under a WWF developmental contract and training in Ohio Valley Wrestling. He never debuted as a regular member of the WWF television roster, though he reportedly did have a bit of a tryst with Tough Enough winner Nidia Guenard. Can't beat that.
Joshua K.'s questions give us a little bit of a "rock and wrestling connection." Hmm . . . I wonder why nobody's ever tried that before . . .
#1. Other than the Big Boss Man, has any other famous wrestler gotten their name or gimmick from a song?
Absolutely. In fact, one of the most famous names in professional wrestling history comes from a song. Buddy Rogers took his nickname "The Nature Boy" from a 1947 pop ballad, the most famous version of which was recorded by Nat King Cole. Of course, Ric Flair would adopt the Nature Boy moniker in later years, as would various other wrestlers like Buddy Landel and Scoot Andrews.
There were also a couple of wrestlers who wrestled under the name "Bad" Leroy Brown, the most famous of which competed in Mid-South and Championship Wrestling from Florida in the 1980's.
#2. Has there ever been any drama between Sting the wrestler and Sting the singer? Have they ever tried to sue each other or anything?
There have never been any issues that I am aware of. If you're curious as to who used the name first, it was almost definitely the musician, who adopted it very early in his career in the 1970's. Sting the wrestler wasn't even involved in his profession until the 1980's and spent at least a year under the moniker Flash (or "Flash Borden" depending on the source) before switching over to being the Stinger.
Gozzz has a two-fer of completely unrelated questions:
1. I seem to recall in the mid-80's NWA, there was an angle where Rocky King (JTTS) turned on Boogie Woogie Man Jimmy Valiant. Do you recall any of that? I seem to remember it stemmed from Jimmy calling Rocky "the best black wrestler he knew." I also seem to recall Rocky King hooking up with Paul Jones and Pez Whatley for a spell. Does any of this ring a bell, or did I imagine all this?
You are absolutely correct . . . except that it was Whatley that turned on Valiant for this reason, not King. The year in question was 1986, and the company in question was Jim Crockett Promotions. You even remember the line that started the feud, as Pez resented being referred to as a "black wrestler" as opposed to being referred to as simply a "wrestler," because he thought that it implied that "black wrestlers" were in a class beneath white wrestlers. Pez took on the name of Shaska Whatley, as well as manager Paul Jones. In one of the brawls between Valiant and Paul Jones' army, Shaska wound up taking away a clump of Jimmy's hair, which lead to a natural stipulation for the matches that would blow off the feud. Those came on July 26, 1986, when Valiant defeated Whatley in a hair versus hair match at the Great American Bash and again on November 27, 1986, when Valiant defeated Paul Jones in a hair versus hair match at the Greensboro leg of Starrcade.
2. This question was brought on by my recalling old Survivor Series team matches. Can you list any and all team member changes (before the match took place), and the reasons, kayfabe or otherwise? I know that Bad News Brown subbed for someone one year, and everyone remembers Mr. Perfect subbing for the Ultimate Warrior in 1992. I know Scott Casey made it to a team in 1989, and he sure as hell wasn't an original member.
Hey, here's a list!
- The first Survivor Series replacement took place at the first Survivor Series in 1987. "Superstar" Billy Graham was supposed to be a part of Hulk Hogan's team in the main event as they wrestled the Heenan family. However, Graham was sidelined when the One Man Gang gave him a big 747 splash on the a concrete floor, opening the door for Don Muraco to join team Hogan. In reality, the splash was a cover for a legitimate hip injury that Graham suffered in a match against "Hacksaw" Butch Reed.
- The next year, 1988, saw a replacement when Don Muraco left the promotion after having been scheduled to team with the Ultimate Warrior, Brutus Beefcake, Sam Houston, and the Blue Blazer against the Honky Tonk Man, Ron Bass, Danny Davis, Greg Valentine, and Bad News Brown. Muraco's sub was "Jumpin'" Jim Brunzell.
- 1988 was also the year of the Scott Casey replacement referenced by Gozzz. Casey was actually a third-string replacement on Jim Duggan's team. Duggan had originally assembled the group of Jake Roberts, Ken Patera, Junkyard Dog, and Tito Santana to face his opponents, Andre the Giant, Rick Rude, Dino Bravo, Mr. Perfect, and Harley Race. The Dog left the WWF before the pay per view, and he was replaced by B. Brian Blair. Blair bailed on the company shortly thereafter, and his replacement was Casey.
- There were plenty of replacements in 1989. Big Boss Man's team the Enforcers originally consisted of Boss Man, Akeem, Rick Matel, and the Honky Tonk Man. Akeem was cut from the team, though, being replaced by Bad News Brown. Their opponents were Dusty Rhodes, Brutus Beefcake, The Red Rooster, and Tito Santana.
- There was also a replacement on Randy Savage's 1989 Survivor Series team. His partners were first set as "Widowmaker" Barry Windham, Dino Bravo, and Greg Valentine, with the opposing team being Jim Duggan, Bret Hart, Ronnie Garvin, and Hecules. Windham was pulled and replaced by the "Canadian Earthquake" John Tenta before the pay per view, though.
- Finally for 1989, the main event pitted the Ultimate Warriors of the Ultimate Warrior (duh), the Rockers, and Jim Neidhart against the Heenan Family of the Colossal Connection and the Brainbusters. A pre-show drug test failure resulted in Brainbuster member Tully Blanchard being fired from the company, so Heenan himself stepped in and wrestled alongside his Family.
- The opening match of the '93 Survivor Series was set to be Mr. Perfect, Razor Ramon, Marty Jannetty, and the 1-2-3 Kid against I.R.S., Diesel, Adam Bomb, and Rick Martel. Perfect had to pull out of the match because his back was essentially being held together by rubber bands and duct tape at this point, and Randy Savage was his replacement.
- Also in 1993, Bret Hart and his brothers Owen, Bruce, and Keith were scheduled to wrestle Jerry Lawler and his three masked Knights. However, Lawler was pulled from the event because of legal difficulties. Specifically, he had been accused of molesting a teenage girl, a charge which later turned out to be false. Lawler was replaced by Shawn Michaels.
- 1993 was apparently the year of "card subject to change." The originally planned main event of that year's Survivor Series pitted the "Foreign Fanatics" of Yokozuna, Ludvig Borga, and the Quebecers against the "All-Americans" of Lex Luger, Tatanka, and the Steiner Brothers. Several weeks before the pay per view, Yoko and Borga assaulted Tatanka, giving him storyline injuries that kept him out of the match. He was replaced by the Undertaker, which would ultimately set up 'Taker's title program with Yokozuna. In retribution, Luger injured Pierre of the Quebecers with a shot from his "loaded" forearm in a singles match that they had as an SS preview. Pierre was replaced by Crush.
- In the 2001 Survivor Series finale to the Invasion angle, Vince McMahon was originally scheduled to be a part of Team WWF along with the Undertaker, Kane, Chris Jericho, and the Rock, who were going up against Team Alliance of Steve Austin, Kurt Angle, Booker T., Shane McMahon, and Rob Van Dam. A few weeks before the show, Vince decided that he needed somebody better than a sixty year old man defending the livelihood of his company and replaced himself with the Big Show.
A gentleman whose name was not listed in the batch 'o questions that Sforcina sent to me asks:
Why is the U.K. Smackdown edited? Other regions are edited also. Sky Sports say it's the program they receive from WWE, but I can't see them including a "From the Vault" segment while cutting out storyline advancement.
Different countries have different regulations regarding what is acceptable to show in their television broadcasts. As much as fans in the United Kingdom, Canada, or Australia may hate to read this, WWE primarily produces its television shows for the American television market and everybody else is in second place. A show that is considered perfectly acceptable per U.S. broadcast regulations may have some content that foreign networks cannot air due to government standards in that country. Oftentimes, this has to do with the level of violence in a particular angle. Some countries are leery when it comes to airing shots with weapons, and others do not want anything to do with television programs involving violence against women.
In addition to restrictions on violence, certain countries have regulations on the level of advertising that can be contained within the body of a television program. As a result of these regulations, certain segments that are primarily designed to sell a product (for example, a promo in which a wrestler talks a lot about an upcoming DVD) might have to be removed in foreign markets when it is fine to air in the U.S.
A fellow by the name of JLAJRC, who I've seen e-mailing 411 for several years now, has a trio of questions. Since he's a dedicated reader, let's take 'em all on:
1.) I've been a wrestling fan for over 15 years. But something I've always wondered is how much of wrestling is "real" vs. acting. I know that wrestlers frequently get injured and even endure lifelong pain because of it. But how much of it is "real?" I know some tricks like pulling punches an stomping your foot on the mat to make something look more painful. But if wrestling was 100% real we'd be seeing a lot more reports of wrestlers becoming paralyzed and the like. Are there other tricks you use to make something look more painful than it really is?
One of the biggest tricks of the trade that isn't already mentioned in this question is the manner in which wrestlers fall to the mat or "bump." Even though hitting the mat or the arena floor will almost always hurt, wrestlers definitely "know how to fall" and attempt to land in a particular position that distributes the impact of the fall across their bodies and thereby minimizes the pain. If you watch any of the several television programs or movies that have provided a behind the scenes look at wrestling over the last ten years, including Tough Enough or Beyond the Mat, you should get a fairly good idea of how bumping works. What is interesting to note in terms of taking bumps is that Mexican wrestlers play things even safer than their American counterparts, as you'll rarely see them take a flat-back bump. Instead, they "roll" through moves in almost a somersault motion as opposed to flipping over and landing flat on their backsides.
Also, though this may seem obvious, most of the moves that are in theory designed to drop wrestlers on their heads come nowhere near close to doing so. Though some guys have perverted these moves and turned them into ACTUAL head drops, things like piledrivers and DDTs are in reality meant to have the majority of the impact absorbed by the guy delivering the move with the head of the "victim" not touching the mat at all or touching it only after their opponent's back or buttocks have done so.
2.) Who played Phantasio, who had only one match in the WWF? Is he still wrestling today?
Phantasio was played by a wrestler named Harry Del Rios, who made his in-ring debut in 1992. His first real exposure in professional wrestling came in the USWA, where he wrestled under the name Spellbinder and did a version of the same gimmick that he would later do in the WWF as Phantasio. (Again, what is it with all of the USWA connections in this column?) Memphis was his home base for quite some time, and he alternated back and forth between wrestling as Spellbinder and wrestling under the name Del Rios for several years before the WWF came calling for him in '95. His only television match was a quick squash against Tony DeVito, which would air editions of WWF Superstars and Wrestling Challenge broadcast during the week of July 16, 1995. (Phantasio's opponent was the same DeVito who would go on to be one of Da Baldies in ECW and then half of the Carnage Crew in Ring of Honor.) He would continue to wrestle in Memphis for the rest of his career, even winning the USWA Heavyweight Title for a period of time in 1997.
In 2002, several Tennessee-based wrestlers had an opportunity to wrestle for TNA in its early days, and Spellbinder was one of them. By this point, he had gone back to his Del Rios ring name and developed a look that resulted in many viewers mistaking him for Scott Steiner at first glance. Del Rios competed in the gauntlet match held to crown the first NWA Champion of the TNA era on June 19, 2002, though he would never be seen in the promotion again.
Rios has continued to compete in local Memphis promotions since his TNA appearance, briefly working under the name Shock as half of the tag team "Shock and Awe" in 2005 before ultimately moving back to the Spellbinder persona.
3.) If the first Persian Gulf War hadn't happened, do you think Vince would've still put the WWF Title on Sgt. Slaughter? Surely Vince could have waited one more PPV to have a Hogan/Warrior rematch at WM. Or even put it on Savage, since that was who Warrior wrestled next.
Given where Slaughter was in his career in the early 1990's, the only conceivable reason for putting the WWF Title on him was to capitalize on the Gulf War. If there was no war, he most likely wouldn't have gotten the championship, period. However, from what I understand, the Iraqi sympathizer angle was not the only reason that the title was taken off of the Warrior when it was. He was not drawing well on house shows, which at the time were a much larger portion of the WWF's business than they are currently.
Brian Smelser asks a question about one of my areas of expertise:
My question is about SHIMMER. I've been a fan of that company since I purchased volume 1 back in 2006. A few of my favorite wrestlers (Tiana Ringer, Alexa Thatcher, & Cindy Rogers) all seemed like they were in line for big pushes when they stopped appearing for SHIMMER. My questions are why did they stop wrestling for them? Is it possible that they'll ever return? Are they still wrestling today?
I am an avid SHIMMER fan myself, owning all of the DVDs and having been to several of the events in person . . . so I actually had the answers to these ready to go off the top of my head.
Cindy Rogers was last seen in SHIMMER for the taping of Volumes 17 and 18 in April 2008, where she lost to Daizee Haze and Mercedes Martinez, respectively. She broke her collarbone before the next set of tapings for the company could take place and spent the better part of six months recovering. She was able to briefly return to the ring from that injury in the early part of 2009 but then had another stretch where she was forced to take time off and didn't pop up again until August '09. Since then, SHIMMER has only held one set of tapings, which took place in November. Cindy was not there, and I frankly do not know offhand whether this was due to another injury or a scheduling conflict. In short, it doesn't seem like Rogers has been away because she doesn't want to be in SHIMMER or because SHIMMER does not want her there. She just hasn't been healthy for large portions of the last two years, and the times during which she has been able to work have not coincided with the times at which the promotion has been running shows. It's just an unfortunate series of coincidences.
Alexa Thatcher, who TNA may fans may remember as former Knockout jobber Alexa Jade, lost a lot of good will with hardcore followers of SHIMMER when she cancelled a booking for an April 2008 event, claiming that there was a family emergency which would prevent her from appearing . . . only for her to take a booking on a wrestling show for another promotion the same weekend. I have personally not seen Thatcher's name in any wrestling results for over a year now, nor have any of the women's wrestling fans that I correspond with. It appears that, though she never made a formal announcement regarding a "retirement," she is no longer pursuing a wrestling career.
Tiana Ringer has not been actively involved in professional wrestling since 2007. Her grandfather passed away at that time, and his death caused her to reevaluate her priorities. According to a message that was posted on her official website at that time, she decided to focus on completing her bachelors and masters degrees as opposed to focusing on professional wrestling. The tone and wording of the message (which is no longer online) did not lead me to believe that she was completely ruling out a return to the ring at some point in the future, but, almost three years have passed since that message went up, so it is not likely.
Jeremy spoke in class today:
1) How long does it usually take to set up/strike everything for a wrestling show, including the ring, ringside gear, and set?
Well, the smartass answer is that it depends on the wrestling show. Obviously, setting up for something like Wrestlemania would take longer than setting up for a standard episode of Raw, which would take longer than setting things up for TNA Impact, which would take longer than setting things up for Ring of Honor, and so on down the line.
It is my understanding from listening to interviews with wrestlers over the years that, for the average WWE television taping, they are showing up at the arena between 1:00 and 3:00 PM local time. So, if you assume that the crew is getting there at the same time as the wrestlers and beginning their work at that point, you're looking at around five or six hours to get everything put into place.
2) Is there a reason WWE replaced metal barricades with the security wall? I imagine aesthetics on TV play a role but what about safety?
I'm not aware of anybody who has been involved with WWE actually making a comment on this, but you've hit the two most likely reasons for the change in your question. The wall looks more professional when tied into the colors of the rest of the set, and it has an additional layer of padding on it, which makes it safer for wrestlers to slam in to.
3) Botchamania shows fans who hop the ring get an ass-whipping but do they get in trouble with the company/police? Also, if someone interrupts a Matt Morgan match and eats a Carbon Footprint, could that person sue Morgan or TNA since fans don't sign waivers at the door?
People who run into wrestling rings these days probably have it a lot better than people who did it thirty or forty years ago, as I've heard many interviews with old school territorial wrestlers who have noted that, in addition to any intruding fans being beaten up by the wrestlers in the ring, they could expect to be hauled back to what was known as the "kayfabe room," where several more wrestlers would make sure that the idiot who rushed the ring knew never to do it again, all while the local police turned a blind eye.
Given that wrestling is now a much more corporate environment, I would be amazed to learn that the kayfabe rooms still exist, but fans who jump the rail can still expect to be decked by a wrestler or even a referee if they make it into the ring. As far as the ability of those fans to sue the wrestlers involved or the company is concerned, there is no one good answer to that question. Laws involving battery and self-defense vary so much between different countries and even different states within the U.S. and apply so differently to different sets of facts that there is no one rule of thumb.
Yes, there are probably jurisdictions and factual situations in which a wrestler could rough up a fan to the point that the fan would be able to sue successfully. Yes, there are probably also jurisdictions and factual situations in which a fan could attempt to bring a lawsuit for the same behavior and be laughed out of court.
4) Randy Orton is the youngest world champ in WWE history but who is the oldest guy to win his first-time world championship?
Of course, the answer to a question like this always depends on what you consider to be a World Title. For purposes of answering this question, I have considered the two current versions of the WWE Title, the WCW Title, the NWA Title, the TNA Title, the AWA Title, the IWGP Title, the AJPW Triple Crown, and the GHC Title to be "world titles."
Looking at all of those championships, the winner is . . . VINCENT KENNEDY MCMAHON~! That's right, when he captured the WWE Title for the first time, Vince was fifty-six years old, making him the competitor with the most grey behind his temples to win his first world title.
Of course, people are probably going to try to take this question a step beyond McMahon and ask who the oldest real wrestler to capture his first world title is. We actually have a tie for that distinction at the age of forty-three. Sergeant Slaughter was that age when he won the WWF Title from the Ultimate Warrior in the early 1990's, and Diamond Dallas Page was that age when he won the WCW Title in the late 1990's. Also, Ric Flair won his first WWF Title at age forty-three, though obviously he held numerous WCW and NWA Championships in the preceding ten years.
Coming in at second place are Ronnie Garvin, Buddy Rogers, and Andre the Giant, all of whom won their first major championships at the age of forty-two. They held the NWA, WWWF, and WWF titles, respectively. (Rogers may actually be disqualified depending on how you interpret the NWA World Title history, as he had an earlier reign with one of the championships that Lou Thesz unified into the championship which is common considered the first true "world" title.)
In third place is Nick Bockwinkel, who won his first AWA World Title at age forty-one. Raven also won his first World Title at forty-one if you consider the NWA Championship to be a World Title but you do not consider the ECW Championship to be a World Title.
5) Could you tell me more about Prince Iaukea and his family? I'm from Hawaii, as is he, but nobody I know watched WCW back in the day so they don't remember his reverse bald spot haircut, rivalry with Norman Smiley, or the Artist Formerly Known as Prince Iaukea gimmick.
The story of the Iaukea name in professional wrestling goes back to King Curtis Iaukea, a Hawaiian who broke into the wrestling business in the early 1960's. In addition to wrestling in his native Hawaii, Iaukea appeared in territories throughout the world. His star probably shone the brightest in the 1970's Australian territory promoted by Jim Barnett and later Tony Kolonie known as World Championship Wrestling (no relation to the U.S. WCW). In addition to being one of the top heels in Australian wrestling history, King Curtis also had stints in Championship Wrestling from Florida, Don Owens' Oregon territory, and the World Wide Wrestling Federation, where he held the championship which can be traced to the modern day WWE World Tag Team Titles. When his time in the ring came to an end, he popped up as a manager in the WWF in 1985 and 1986 under the name "The Wizard" and appeared in WCW in the mid-1990's as "The Master," who was the mastermind behind the Dungeon of Doom stable.
There were actually two different Prince Iaukeas. The original Prince Iaukea was Curtis Iaukea's legitimate son. Though he was perfectly competent in the ring based on the footage that I have seen, he did not come anywhere close to being the level of star that his father was. He was primarily an opening match and lower card wrestler in Championship Wrestling from Florida, where he had programs with the likes of Hector Guerrero and Tyree Pride. Perhaps the most memorable match of his career was a bout that he had against the Black Ninja in CWF. The match is notable because the Ninja was the Great Muta in one of his very first United States appearances. That match was taped for television and later released on several different DVD compilations of classic Florida footage produced in the first half of this decade before Mike Graham sold the rights to the CWF tape library to WWE.
The second Prince Iaukea is the one that Jeremy is thinking of. Prince #2 was actually not related to Curtis Iaukea in any way, shape, or form. His name was Mike Haynes III (or Haynor, depending on the source), and he had legitimate Polynesian heritage and was actually born in Honolulu, Hawaii. As a result of this heritage and as a result of Kevin Sullivan taking a shine to him when he was booking WCW in the mid-1990's, Haynes was given the Prince Iaukea name by Sullivan as a tribute to King Curtis. WCW's announcers at the time did refer to Haynes as a relative of Curtis Iaukea, but, again, there was no legitimate relationship.
Prince #2 held the WCW Television Championship for a period of time, scoring an upset victory over Steven Regal (now William Regal) when Regal was in the middle of a feud with Rey Misterio, Jr. over the title. Iaukea's reign was uneventful, and he was largely portrayed as a champion who retained his title through luck or fluke wins, most often as a result of Misterio or Regal costing each other victories. When he was finally done with the title, WCW loaned him out to New Japan Pro Wrestling for a tour. Upon returning form NJPW, Prince was thrust into the middle of the company's Vince Russo era, where he was renamed the Artist Formerly Known as Prince Iaukea, told to emulate the singer Prince, and given Booker T.'s future wife Sharmell (at the time known as "Paisley") as a valet. Iaukea held the Cruiserweight Title in that gimmick, though that title was treated so badly during the Russo run that it didn't mean much.
Prince Iaukea quietly faded into the background as WCW closed down. His last role in the company, which mainly took place on WCW Worldwide and other syndicated shows, saw him being referred to as simply "The Artist" and doing a gimmick which borrowed heavily from that of Raven, who had recently left the company to return to ECW. Since WCW folded, Haynes has done a fair amount of stunt work in various movies and television shows, and he continues to be active in the independent pro wrestling scene in Florida, mainly for a company called Pro Wrestling Fusion. He has a son who has also gotten into the business and works under the name of Nick Primo.
Here is some video footage of Iaukea wrestling his son just a few months ago:
6) I think you've covered this before but I'll ask just to make sure. What happens to pay-per-view sets after the shows? I could imagine a warehouse being full of old Halloween Havoc props or some such but wanted to ask you if you knew?
Like sets for any movie or television show, they are disassembled, and, to the extent that people believe that they can be stored and reused, they are stored and reused. To the extent that they cannot be reused, they are disposed of.
Jake wants to go downtown with Bruno:
Got a question about the referees: Just got the Survivor Series Anthology (1 and 2) and in the 1996 Survivor Series during the opening match which is a Survivor Series Elimination Match between Owen Hart, British Bulldog and the New Rockers vs. Doug and Phillip LaFon, and the Godwins. Who is the outside official? It looks like Harvey Wippleman, was he ever an official?
You are correct . . . that was most likely Harvey Whippleman. Whippleman's last assignment as a heel manager in the WWF was with Bertha Faye, and, when Bertha split town, Horrible Harvey didn't have that much to do. As a result, the company started an angle in which Whippleman would appear at ringside from week to week with a clipboard, taking notes on matches. Originally it was assumed that Harvey was scouting new talent to manage, but it was ultimately revealed that he was taking notes on the refereeing in the Fed's matches because he thought that he could improve it.
Of course, the story was that all of the babyfaces distrusted Harv at first because of his reputation from his days as a manager, but, over time, it became clear that he was going to call things right down the middle. This came into play at least once in a match, when he reversed his decision in an Owen Hart versus Barry Horowitz match on WWF Superstars as a result of Hart refusing to break the Sharpshooter after he had already been declared the victor.
If there were any bigger plans for Harvey as a referee, they never materialized. He would go on to don the stripes for the WWF again in 1999, as a result of an angle in which the regular WWF zebra crew went on strike and had to be replaced by "scabs" such as Whippleman.
Aram sends to me what I believe are the first questions from Denmark that I have answered:
Back in late 2002, Íve heard rumors and read something about WWE making a one time deal with Lennox Lewis to have a match or confrontation against Brock Lesnar at No Way Out, any truth to that rumor?
The rumors were absolutely correct. Lewis and WWE were in negotiations in 2002 to bring the former boxing champion in to have a shoot fight (not a worked match) with Brock Lesnar. At least one source reported that the offer on the table to Lewis from Vince McMahon was over five million dollars. Ultimately, the negotiations broke down. Though the exact reasons for the failure of the camps to reach a deal are unclear, I recall reading at the time that there were disagreements over what rules would be used in this mixed boxer versus wrestler fight and that there were concerns about whether Vince McMahon could get licensed to promote a show featuring shoot fights given his history in wrestling.
What was the plan for Steve Austin if he had stay around and not left WWE mid 2002?
Immediately before his departure, Ric Flair had lost a match to Austin in which the Nature Boy would have to become Stone Cold's servant if he dropped the fall. Presumably, this would have lead in to some sort of extended feud with Flair.
Why did WWE stop doing UK PPVS? I believe the last one was Rebeillion 2003 with Edge - Lesnar as the headliner, I believe it was a good showcase to pair up new matches and give other a shot at the main event
There is only one reason that WWE stops doing anything that generates revenue for them, UK-only PPVs included: The product that they are not producing is no longer as profitable as they want it to be or they do not believe that it will be as profitable as some new concept that they want to test drive. If the English shows were making the promotion a good chunk of change, we probably never would have seen them abandoned.
What is Vader up to these days?
He is no longer wrestling on a regular basis. According to the Vader tribute site BigVanVader.com, he had hip replacement surgery in 2008 and recently has been training his son, Jesse White, to become a wrestler. (Jesse, of course, is not to be confused with the current Illinois Secretary of State.)
How come Sid was the man to take the title away from HBK back in 96? Was it a sudden change to the plans, since Sid only had returned to the WWF a few months prior?
There were very few individuals to whom Michaels could credibly lose the championship at that point, as Scott Hall and Kevin Nash had just bolted for WCW and Michaels was already making it known that he did not want to lose the championship to Bret Hart. Sid was just the most convenient wrestler to transition the title to without having to do a babyface versus babyface match.
Why did the British Bulldog leave WWF in 92?
The Bulldog and the Ultimate Warrior were both fired from the WWF at the same time in 1992 when they were caught receiving shipments of human growth hormone, a performance enhancing drug. This was during the period of time that Vince McMahon himself was facing federal criminal charges for steroid distribution, so behavior like that was taken much more seriously than it was at any other point prior to the current wellness policy. Despite the fact that there was some pretty damning evidence that he was using illegal drugs, Davey Boy was hired by WCW almost immediately after the WWF let him go. That's one of those things about the wrestling business that just makes me a little bit ill . . .
Íve read a rumor that if brock had stayed in 2004, they wanted to do a HHH - Lesnar match for WM21? and was there anytime at all before he became a MMA Fighter, that he was close to returning to WWE?
Lesnar-Triple H certainly made sense to headline Wrestlemania in 2004 if you stop and think about it. The two wrestlers had, up to that point, not met in a serious program, and they were largely considered to be the top men on their respective "brands."
There were fleeting rumors that Lesnar had been extended offers by the company the entire time that he was away from them, but, actually, the majority of time that Lesnar was in neither WWE nor UFC, he was involved in a fairly nasty legal battle with the 'E regarding what he was and was not allowed to do in the combat sports world in light of a no-compete agreement that he signed in order to obtain his release from WWE. Ultimately, the two sides settled their disputes and Lesnar got the much sweeter end of the deal, as whatever the confidential resolution of the two parties' differences was, it cleared the way for Brock to go to UFC and become a significantly bigger (and wealthier) mainstream star than what WWE had ever made him.
Jaheev also has a series of questions:
1. Why do you think heel factions have always been more successful than face factions? Can you think of any successful face factions?
I would suspect that heel factions have historically done better than babyface factions because a big part of professional wrestling is stacking the deck against the face, only to have him overcome the odds and triumph in the end. That dynamic gets completely screwed up if you create a situation in which a babyface faction feuds with a singles heel, because then the faces are never really at a disadvantage and, as a result, there is no need for the crowd to get behind them or ultimately pay to see them pull off the unthinkable to close out the angle.
Because of the above, if you run with a babyface faction, you almost have to do it as a part of a storyline in which heel and face factions are feuding. It's the only way to make sure that your face stable can be placed "in peril" before ultimately making their comeback. However, though they have worked at certain places and in certain times in wrestling, stable versus stable feuds are very difficult to do properly. The problem is that so many individual wrestlers get involved that, invariably, several of them get lost in the shuffle and become impossible for fans to connect with, killing the whole story dead in its tracks. (For good examples of this, see the WWF's 1990's "Gang Warz" storyline or the more recent abysmal flop of ROH and its "Faction Warfare.")
Despite the above, there is still the occasional babyface faction that breaks out and find success. Perhaps the most popular of the lot is the Triple H-lead version of D-Generation X from the height of the WWF Attitude Era. Another good example would be the babyface version of the nWo Wolfpac, consisting of the likes of Sting, Lex Luger, and Kevin Nash, though they didn't last for nearly as long as DX and didn't have strong opponents to play off of. However, for the short time that they were together, they got some of the loudest crowd reactions of the entire Monday Night War. Also, the Four Horsemen were a babyface unit for the vast majority of the 1990's wrestling boom, but it's hard to call them a "successful" face faction just because they were remembered so much better from their performances as heels just a few years earlier.
2. At Halloween Havoc 1998 Bret Hart defeated Sting. After the match Bret's music played, but it was a completely different theme from his normal theme music at that time and (as far as I remember) also never played afterwards. Why did he enter the match with his normal theme and left with another (unnamed) theme?
Given that it happened only once and was never repeated, the most likely explanation is that it was either a production error or something that was tested out once but didn't go over well enough to bother repeating.
3. Why are triple threat matches in WWE always no DQ and since when did the announcers start to point this out each match?
Triple threat matches in WWE have been no DQ since their very inception. One of the earliest three-way bouts that I recall seeing on WWE TV involved the Godwinns and the New Blackjacks, and there was a point at which one of the hog farmers used his slop bucket to deck one of the cowboys. It was pointed out by the announcers that there COULDN'T be a DQ. Usually when there is a disqualification, the match immediately comes to an end, with the person who violated the rules losing and the person who did not winning. When somebody cheats in a triple threat match, though, you can't immediately end it and declare a winner because there are two innocent parties, and wrestling usually shies away from "co-winners" of matches.
I suppose one possible solution to this would be to remove the disqualified wrestlerfrom the match and allow the other two to continue as though they were having a singles bout, though then the concept gets a little bit screwy because triple threats would be one fall to a finish the majority of the time but elimination matches in some limited circumstances.
4. Why is hanging on to the ropes after a sunset flip from the opponent considered illegal, and even see referees kicking the hands off the ropes?
The way that I have always looked at it is this: The ropes of a professional wrestling ring are like the boundary lines on a basketball court or a football field. If you go out of bounds, the official needs to stop play and get the players back in bounds. The same is true of a wrestling ring. In hanging on to the ropes, the wrestler is technically outside of the "playing field" of the match and needs to be brought in immediately.
6. In many no DQ/no holds barred/streetfight etc. matches from the past and present, there have been rope breaks/counts/DQ's. For example in the recent Beer Money vs. British Invasion cage match from Impact the British Invasion was disqualified in a no DQ cage match! Do the wrestling companies really think the audience will not notice these kind of things?
Yes. That's why they do it in the first place. I am amazed, however, that they continue to believe this despite the fact that these finishes almost never receive anything other than the most negative of crowd reactions.
And that will do it for another week of Ask 411. Sforcina will be back in seven days . . . in the meantime, keep your eye on 411's Twitter feeds to catch all of the great content on the site!
Was Sting the wrestler ever credited in his TV appearances as just "Sting" - other than his voiceover work on "Captain Planet," that is?
As for referees kicking the arms of wrestlers holding onto the ropes, "the version I remember is," it was to make sure the wrestler was actually holding, as opposed to just touching, the ropes; if the wrestler managed to keep holding on after the kick, the other wrestler had to break the hold.
Posted By: ThatDonGuy (Registered) on December 22, 2009 at 11:31 PM
Correction: Vince was 54, not 56, in 1999 when he defeated Triple H to win the WWF Championship. He was born in August 1945 and won the title in September 1999 on a Smackdown taping. Then of course, he forfeited the belt and the winner of the 6 pack challenge match at Unforgiven '99 won the title, that being Triple H.
Posted By: Dan (Guest) on December 22, 2009 at 11:44 PM
So if the ropes are the barrier and the ref is "bringing the wrestler back into the ring" then why dont they do it when a wrestler makes it to the ropes in a submission move. It is one of the old school spots that happened in wresttling, typically to the heel, to add drama to the match.
Posted By: Really (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 12:05 AM
"For example in the recent Beer Money vs. British Invasion cage match from Impact the British Invasion was disqualified in a no DQ cage match!"
Was the match specifically announced as no disqualification? Just because it's in a cage doesn't automatically make it no-DQ - it's just there to, theoretically, stop outside assistance or to stop someone running away (and, of course, to provide an excuse for near-certain blood).
Posted By: The Ogre (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 12:21 AM
my wife was local crew for a number os years she says set up for smackdown and raw would take about 6 hours and strike would be at most 4 hours
Posted By: kermit (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 12:28 AM
UFC isn't making Brock more than WWE was. Vince offered him a 7 year, 45 million dollar contract. Brock still shot it down.
Posted By: WilliamMorgan (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 12:28 AM
It was Pistol Pez Whatley who turned on Jimmy Valient.
Rocky King was not involved in that angle.
Posted By: MG (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 12:29 AM
"#1. Other than the Big Boss Man, has any other famous wrestler gotten their name or gimmick from a song?"
The Fabulous Freebirds
Johnny B. Badd
Posted By: MG (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 12:40 AM
Great column, but can you go back to bolding the entire question? It's easier to skip over questions I already know the answer to or don't really appeal to me.
Thanks!
Posted By: Empire Of Ownage (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 01:05 AM
Bulldog and Warrior where not fired in 1992 for receiving shipments of human growth hormone at least warrior wasn't anyway, they where made scapegoats by Vince because the feds where breathing down his neck. Vince had confessed to Warrior I read somewhere that he feard going to Jail, Bulldog may have been recieving shipemnts but Warrior wasn't look at his body at the time he looked about 240 pounds no more, It's all in Warrior's Shoot Interview which may still be on the Net somewhere.
Posted By: ChrisA (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 02:24 AM
I think buying the ticket waives alot of your rights and wrestlers could beat you if you enter the ring legally.
Posted By: Guest#0621 (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 02:25 AM
Mark Henry was supposed to be on a Survivor Series elimination team in 1996 with Marc Mero, The Stalker, and a debuting Rocky Maivia, but he broke his leg before the show and was replaced with Jake The Snake Roberts.
Posted By: Tom (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 02:45 AM
Rocky King was not involved in the Boogie Man/PPW angle. BWM and PPW had just finished a tag match on World Wide Wrestling and BWM said that PPW was the greatest black wrestler....which made PPW mad and he attacked Boogie.
Posted By: Hurtzher (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 02:56 AM
I caught atleast 3 questions you got wrong, but there are probably more...
Vince took himself out of the 'Winner take all Match' from Survivor Series 2001 becuase he tore his groin or leg while training for the match. Having needing a replacement, he chose to quickly push The Big Show, who had been doing nothing of note at the time.
Austin BEAT Flair in his final match, before walking out in 2002. Flair did not beat Austin, as you stated.
Also, Brock vs. Triple H was the long term plan (one year later) for 2005 (WM21), not 2004, as you stated.
Posted By: FUnnyY (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 02:58 AM
Looking at all of those championships, the winner is . . . VINCENT KENNEDY MCMAHON~! That's right, when he captured the WWE Title for the first time, Vince was fifty-six years old, making him the competitor with the most grey behind his temples to win his first world title.
i think the eldest (real) wrestler has to be hulk hogan he won the wwe championship at backlash 2002. i think he was 49
Posted By: Guest#4785 (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 03:13 AM
Great column. At Wrestlemania 24, when Jericho came out for his entrance, right before the camera panned to the video scree before his pose, the save.us_222 changed to something different. Do you know what it said, and if it was just nonsense or and actual word?
Posted By: Um... Me (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 03:25 AM
The reason there is a 'from the vault' section in the UK version of smackdown is because the US version has many more advert breaks than UK regs allow. Sky want to stretch it to two hours which gives a portion of time that they need to fill...hence why they suddenly go to John Cena saying don't try this in the middle of a match...
Posted By: Bring back attitude (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 03:51 AM
Good article. Enjoyed the info on King and Valiant. Would also like to see the questions in bold text!
Posted By: Guest#3793 (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 04:08 AM
One of the Bill Apter magazines or maybe WCW magazine had a photo of the 2 Stings together at a charity event.
Speaking of Apter mags, they always gave the kayfabe excuse for "obeying rules" in a no DQ match as being: although they would not lose the match, the wrestler could be fined for disregarding the referee
Posted By: Guest#8292 (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 04:12 AM
"Immediately before his departure, Austin had lost a match to Ric Flair in which Stone Cold would have to become the Nature Boy's servant if he dropped the fall. Presumably, this would have lead in to some sort of extended feud with Flair."
He actually won the match.
Posted By: Thor (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 05:04 AM
Sting the singer couldn't do anything about Sting the wrestler using the name anyway. The wrestler owns the trademark on the name.
Posted By: Zach627 (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 06:13 AM
As someone pointed out earlier, Mark Henry was pulled from Survivor Series 1996 -- he was set to team with Wildman Marc Mero, the Stalker and Rocky Maivia against Hunter Hearst Helmsley, Goldust, Crush and Jerry Lawler, but was replaced by Jake "The Snake" Roberts. I didn't hear that he broke his leg, and I'm not sure that's the case, given that the WWF ran an angle to explain his replacement in which he got beaten up by HHH, Goldust and Crush following a tug-of-war contest with Crush, and I doubt they would have put Mark in a tug-of-war with a broken leg.
Another replacement that was missed occurred at Survivor Series 1997. The British Bulldog, Jim Neidhart, Doug Furnas and Phil LaFon were supposed to face the Patriot, Vader, Marc Mero and Goldust, but the Patriot was injured a few weeks out and ended up being replaced with a debuting Steve Blackman.
They don't count as "replacements" per se, but I can think of two other occasions on which Survivor Series teams underwent notable changes. The first was in 1999, when the Big Show beat up his teammates (the Blue Meanie, Taka Michinoku and Funaki) to go it alone against the Big Boss Man, Prince Albert, Mideon and Viscera. The second was at Survivor Series 2007, when Matt Hardy was injured just prior to the pay-per-view and, instead of replacing him, his team (Triple H, Jeff Hardy, Rey Mysterio and Kane) just went into the match a member short against Umaga, Ken Kennedy, Montel Vontavious Porter, Finlay and Big Daddy V.
Posted By: G. Jonah Jameson (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 07:45 AM
" However, from what I understand, the Iraqi sympathizer angle was not the only reason that the title was taken off of the Warrior when it was. He was not drawing well on house shows, which at the time were a much larger portion of the WWF's business than they are currently."
I've got to believe that if they had kept the gold on Warrior for 2 more months and had the Mania rematch, they wouldn't have had to move arenas to du embarassingly low ticket sales.
Warrior draws badly.
Hogan smiting Warrior...that'd draw well.
Also regerding tricks to make things look painful, there's the trick of slapping your thigh when kicking someone's face (ie Test or HBK), that gives the illusion of incredible impact because of the sound it makes.
In Japan, they use kicks to the face like Ric Flair used chops, but they aren't portrayed as devastating, whilst a superkick is one of the best finishers in US history - simply because of a slapped thigh.
Posted By: Quimby (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 08:01 AM
Re: British Invasion getting DQ'd
Another shyte booking part is that TNA has had the rule of "titles change hands on a DQ" since late 2003. Unless they made some sort of announcement of getting rid of that rule, this was a MAJOR booking flub.
Posted By: AndrewCrow (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 08:04 AM
"Buddy Rogers took his nickname "The Nature Boy" from a 1947 pop ballad, the most famous version of which was recorded by Nat King Cole. Of course, Ric Flair would adopt the Nature Boy moniker in later years, as would various other wrestlers like Buddy Landel and Scoot Andrews."
I have another one to add to the list...Nature Boy Roger Kirby. He wrestled in the AWA around 1976 or 1977. I don't remember much else about him though. Does anybody else?
Posted By: chucky (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 08:47 AM
Does Xanta Klaus count? I know he won a squash on Raw the night after In Your House in Dec. 1995.
Posted By: DeeRayMoore (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 09:11 AM
I distinctly remember Bobby Lashley being the first person to break the Masterlock. I DO kinda remember what you're talking about from Tribute to the Troops...but I know for a fact that they made a big deal about Lashley being the first person to break the Masterlock.
Posted By: JamesBrown (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 09:16 AM
Great column. One correct about the BWM-PPW feud. The hair cutting actually happened at the onset, right after Valiant called Whatley "the greatest black athlete." Whatley beat him down, and then conveniently had scissors in his back pocket to cut his hair. He and Paul Jones would come out for each match with that little baggie of hair.
Posted By: Thomas (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 09:20 AM
With respect to Kermit and his wife, when I worked the arena where RAW was going to be done, it took far longer than 6 hours to set up. I showed up at 8 in the morning, and it was obvious that the crew had been there from probably the night before, as a lot of the set up had already been done, and they worked all through the day. Those shows are massive undertakings. The crews work their butts off.
Posted By: hbkslush (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 09:21 AM
I wasn't credited with ANY work on Captain Planet. That was that no-talent ass clown singer who was Zarn.
Posted By: STINGER! (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 09:32 AM
"In addition to restrictions on violence, certain countries have regulations on the level of advertising that can be contained within the body of a television program. As a result of these regulations, certain segments that are primarily designed to sell a product (for example, a promo in which a wrestler talks a lot about an upcoming DVD) might have to be removed in foreign markets when it is fine to air in the U.S."
I bet that would be China, stupid commies.
Posted By: R Truth (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 09:53 AM
Great column. At Wrestlemania 24, when Jericho came out for his entrance, right before the camera panned to the video scree before his pose, the save.us_222 changed to something different. Do you know what it said, and if it was just nonsense or and actual word?
Um.. Me actually. It was SaveME.222
Posted By: rated_R_superstar (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 10:47 AM
A rather glaring omission to the Survivor Series replacement question...Eddie Guerrero was replaced after his death in 2005, I think a week or two before the event, with Randy Orton, who actually ended up being the last man standing in the match, (presumably) raising his stock significantly in the eyes of WWE, and eventually serving as a kind of backdrop to the extremely uncomfortable "Eddie's in hell" program with Rey Mysterio.
Posted By: BJC (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 11:01 AM
In 1991, Sid was supposed to captain a team (Legion of Doom & Bossman) against Jake Roberts (IRS and Natural Disasters. Once Sid suffered an injury, the returning Savage took his place. However, the WWF then decided tohe infamous Snakebite angle to remove both men, Savage by injury, Jake by suspension, leaving the main event a six man elimination match. I don't entirely know the logic behind that, because Savage & Roberts on opposite sides would have really jacked up the heat for that match. Perhaps it was to try to sell the Tuesday Night in Texas PPV to follow shortly thereafter.
Posted By: Michael L (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 11:23 AM
"In many no DQ/no holds barred/streetfight etc. matches from the past and present, there have been rope breaks/counts/DQ's. For example in the recent Beer Money vs. British Invasion cage match from Impact the British Invasion was disqualified in a no DQ cage match! Do the wrestling companies really think the audience will not notice these kind of things?"
A very notorious example of this came at the first Uncensored PPV in 1995. The announcers stressed for the ENTIRE PPV that it was "anything goes," yet when Flair in drag interferes in the Savage/Avalanche match, it triggers a DQ. The saddest thing was that wasn't even the shittiest ending of the evening. That was reserved for the main event when Hogan defeated Vader in a strap match by dragging Ric Flair to the 4 corners. Just pathetic.
Posted By: Michael L (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 11:32 AM
Since you mentioned the AWA title as a valid world title, Wouldn't Venrne Gagne's last title victory in 1980 at the age of 54 count as one of the oldest wrestlers to win a championship?
Posted By: Cityfan1927 (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 11:35 AM
"There were very few individuals to whom Michaels could credibly lose the championship at that point, as Scott Hall and Kevin Nash had just bolted for WCW and Michaels was already making it known that he did not want to lose the championship to Bret Hart. Sid was just the most convenient wrestler to transition the title to without having to do a babyface versus babyface match."
I recall hearing that Vader had been penciled in to win the belt at Survivor Series, but when J.J. Dillon left the Fed to go back to WCW (presumably with knowledge of these plans), they changed it to Sid. Regardless, Shawn dropping the belt at SS '96 was done to set up him regaining it in San Antonio for the Royal Rumble '97. Shawn not wanting to lose to Bret didn't come up until later.
Posted By: Guest#6419 (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 11:51 AM
When I was living in Florida, I saw a fantastic match between Prince Iaukea and Chris Jones for the PWF Luchacore (terrible name) title.
The highlights of his match with his son make both of them look awful.
Posted By: Tim Haught (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 12:03 PM
Bulldog and Warrior where not fired in 1992 for receiving shipments of human growth hormone at least warrior wasn't anyway, they where made scapegoats by Vince because the feds where breathing down his neck. Vince had confessed to Warrior I read somewhere that he feard going to Jail, Bulldog may have been recieving shipemnts but Warrior wasn't look at his body at the time he looked about 240 pounds no more, It's all in Warrior's Shoot Interview which may still be on the Net somewhere.
Posted By: ChrisA (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 02:24 AM
________________________________
I don't know what's funnier...someone believing that Warrior was not on steroids or someone believing that Warrior is credible.
Posted By: MasterShake (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 12:31 PM
I read a Lesnar quote somewhere that he offered to do a once-off clean job at Wrestlemania for 3 million dollars but that McMahon said no...
Posted By: Stealer (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 01:23 PM
I always thought Vince dropped out of Team WWF because he realised he couldn't credibly be the 'last man standing' and didn't want to take a pin from anyone.
Posted By: woody (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 01:29 PM
i think the eldest (real) wrestler has to be hulk hogan he won the wwe championship at backlash 2002. i think he was 49
Posted By: Guest#4785 (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 03:13 AM
The question as posted, was the age at when the wrestler won their FIRST (world) championship. Call my crazy .. but I have a vague recollection of Hogan winning a few belts before 2002.
Reading comprehension is a good thing, especially when you're about to tell someone they're wrong.
Posted By: Nyte (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 01:36 PM
To cityfan: The question was the oldest guy to win his FIRST world title.So by Verne winning his first around World War 1 (sarcasm) he doesn't qualify.
IMO the best "santa" angle was in Mid-South where Santa was in the crowd the whole show from the beginning,entertaining and playing with all the kids. Then in the main event he jumped the rail and attacked someone in the ring. I think it was Junkyard Dog in the santa suit. I kinda remember this story from a shoot interview with Bill Watts.Does anyone know the details?
Posted By: gonzo2 (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 01:49 PM
"Since you mentioned the AWA title as a valid world title, Wouldn't Venrne Gagne's last title victory in 1980 at the age of 54 count as one of the oldest wrestlers to win a championship?
Posted By: Cityfan1927 (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 11:35 AM"
That wasn't the question. The question was who was the oldest person when he won his first world title.
Posted By: MG (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 02:03 PM
"Other than the Big Boss Man, has any other famous wrestler gotten their name or gimmick from a song?"
"Macho Man" Randy Savage probably got the nickname after the Village People's song. Also, Koko Ware went by "Stagger Lee" after losing a Loser Leave Town match in Memphis - and yes, I know the question asks about "famous" wrestlers, but Koko is a WWE Hall of Famer (try typing "Koko Ware" and "Hall of Famer" in the same paragraph as non-member Savage without your head exploding).
Botchamania shows fans who hop the ring get an ass-whipping but do they get in trouble with the company/police?
My cousin says he did time for getting drunk and punching Ric Flair in a match in NC back in the early '80's, but he's probably full of shit.
Posted By: Adam Jones (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 02:04 PM
"With "Santa" wrestling for the major promotions in a least one match every year, I was wondering if he has ever won a match"
At the rate CM Punk is going I wouldnt be surprised if he does this year.
Vince: Oh I give you the title and you wont wear a suit!?? The you're going to lose to THE suit! You lose to Santa Claus clean or you'rrreee FIIIRED!!
Posted By: Just Saying (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 02:14 PM
Fave wrestling Christmas moment for me is back in ECW when 911 choke slammed Santa in the ring.
Posted By: Joe (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 04:16 PM
A trio of other names that came from songs. JYD's Mid South persona of Stagger Lee from Wilson Picketts, Bad Bad Leroy Brown's name also came from the Croce song, and one other that I can think of came from the Coasters song Charlie Brown. Jimmy Valiant used this song for his alter ego of the masked Charlie Brown character.
Posted By: Stagger Lee (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 04:47 PM
Someone mentioned that they heard there were plans to have Vader take the WWF Title off Shawn Michaels in 1996, rather than Sycho Sid, and I've heard that too. The way I heard it, Vader had actually been slated to beat Shawn for the title at Summerslam, but Shawn got the plans changed when Ahmed Johnson, who had gotten a WWF Title shot he was presumably going to use against Vader, went down with an injury. Then the plan was for Vader to go over Sid in their No. 1 contenders' match at In Your House: Buried Alive and go on to beat Shawn at Survivor Series, but this time the plans were changed when Vader got hurt. Vader didn't really wrestle between the loss to Sid at Buried Alive and he hardly had to do any work in the match he ended up getting at Survivor Series, so the timing makes sense.
The logic that Sid made sense to take the title off Michaels without doing a babyface-vs.-babyface match doesn't really hold up, as one could argue that both men were essentially faces going into Survivor Series. Sid was certainly a face when he beat Vader at Buried Alive, and although they teased dissension between him and Shawn between PPVs, there was never really anything to hint that Sid was the bad guy here except that Shawn was WWF Champion and was ostensibly the company's top babyface. Sid's official turn didn't come until the Survivor Series match itself, when he whacked Jose Lothario with a TV camera.
Posted By: G. Jonah Jameson (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 05:04 PM
"In 1991, Sid was supposed to captain a team (Legion of Doom & Bossman) against Jake Roberts (IRS and Natural Disasters. Once Sid suffered an injury, the returning Savage took his place. However, the WWF then decided tohe infamous Snakebite angle to remove both men, Savage by injury, Jake by suspension, leaving the main event a six man elimination match. I don't entirely know the logic behind that, because Savage & Roberts on opposite sides would have really jacked up the heat for that match. Perhaps it was to try to sell the Tuesday Night in Texas PPV to follow shortly thereafter."
Not quite. Sid got injured and they pulled Jake from the match after the snakebite incident. It wasn't until after Survivor series that Savage was reinstated and they had the match at This Tuesday in Texas. Savage was never advertised as being in the Survivor Series match, snake bite or no snake bite.
Posted By: jeff (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 07:39 PM
"reindeer suit-donner (Get it?)"
I don't get it, the reindeer is named Donder.
Posted By: Billzilla (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 07:52 PM
"Was the match specifically announced as no disqualification? Just because it's in a cage doesn't automatically make it no-DQ - it's just there to, theoretically, stop outside assistance or to stop someone running away (and, of course, to provide an excuse for near-certain blood)."
People like you make me so mad sometimes. If you're watching a cage match and it ends in a dq, you've just been pissed on. Don't ask someone who's pissing on you why they did it, and don't defend their right to do so.
Posted By: Jerry (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 07:56 PM
More Survivor Series replacement omissions:
In 1990, Nikolai Volkoff, Tito Santana and The Bushwhackers were to face Sgt Slaughter, The Orient Express and Akeem. Akeem had left the WWF so he was replaced by Boris Zukov.
Also in 1990, Hulk Hogan, Jim Duggan, The Big Bossman and Tugboat were to face Earthquake, Dino Bravo, Rick Rude and The Barbarian. Rude had left the WWF so he was replaced by Haku.
In 1991, Jim Duggan, Kerry Von Erich, Jim Neidhart and Ricky Steamboat were to face Col Mustafa, Skinner, Big Bully Busick and The Berzerker. Busick left the WWF and was replaced by Hercules. Steamboat left the WWF for WCW shortly after the match was announced and he was replaced by Tito Santana. Neidhart suffered an injury at the hands of Ric Flair and The Beverly Brothers and he was replaced by Sgt Slaughter to officially turn him face again.
Posted By: Guest#6241 (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 08:12 PM
WWE didn't acknowledge that a troop broke the Masterlock. They continued to say that until Lashley broke the Masterlock "for the first time" on Raw.
Posted By: Gozzo (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 08:22 PM
The Christmas Creature was hilarious! The funniest thing I remember about him was one week on memphis TV, they were doing some kind of a Royal Rumble style battle royal and wrestlers had to draw numbers from a can and Jacobs couldn't fit his hand into the can! Oh, you gotta love those old Memphis days!
Posted By: Guest#6434 (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 09:04 PM
Don't forget in the '89 Survivor Series when Bobby Heenan replaced Tully Blanchard after Blanchard failed a drug test. Also, in Dynamite's book, he says that Muraco and JYD were fired during a tour prior to the '88 Survivor Series, Muraco was fired for mocking Bockwinkel, and JYD was fired for urinating behind the seat of a bus driver that was driving the wrestlers.
Posted By: The Man (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 10:42 PM
Wasn't Undertaker a suprise entrant for DiBiase's Survivor Series team?
Posted By: C.Drama (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 11:04 PM
Actually they did mention the troop "breaking" the masterlock on RAW. Masters whined that it didn't count since JBL (dressed as Santa) hit the ring and nailed Masters, therby breaking the hold. Then IIRC Coach who was basically filling the GM spot at the time had the troop's "win" stricken from the record since it was JBL who caused Masters to break the hold. Later on during the build to Mania,then ECW champ Lashley did start appearing on RAW and became the first to actually break the hold.
And this brings up a point, hard to call the tribute shows as full "canon" since JBL essentially did a face turn there, yet next week on TV he was a heel. Same thing with Big Show in 08 Tribute, he walked out on his team, due to heel miscommunication, yet it was never brung up on TV again.
Posted By: FRS (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 12:10 AM
Lloyd Price actually sang the most popular version of Stagger Lee and the song is actually alot older than that and was orginally entitled Stack O' Lee
Posted By: Guest#8474 (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 01:21 AM
I still remember being a dumb 10 year old and thinking that Sting the wrestler was going to host Saturday Night Live after "Sting" was announced as the upcoming host. And I recently watched an episode of Wrestling Challenge from a month or so before the 1987 Survivor Series and swear that a heel manager mentioned the Junkyard Dog being on Savages team and he didn't mention Steamboat.
Posted By: Guest#9750 (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 01:24 AM
On the whole Sting the wrestler and Sting the pop star, you forgot to mention that it was listed on the old WCW website that it was Sting the wrestler who owned the trademark to the name Sting, not the musician. I find it weird that Bordon was able to beat what's-his-name to getting the trademark.
Posted By: KaosKarma (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 06:13 PM
What about the Yeti in WCW? I certainly would characterize him as a snowman gimmick. Of course, I am smarter than almost all of the 411 writers.
Posted By: The Great Ser Drake (Guest) on December 25, 2009 at 06:21 AM
What about the Yeti in WCW? I certainly would characterize him as a snowman gimmick. Of course, I am smarter than almost all of the 411 writers.
Posted By: The Great Ser Drake (Guest) on December 25, 2009 at 06:21 AM
The original question stated “but I was wondering if there have been any wrestling snowmen (frosty style . . . not abominable)”
The Yeti would come under the latter, I fell.
"reindeer suit-donner (Get it?)"
I don't get it, the reindeer is named Donder.
Posted By: Billzilla (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 07:52 PM
You lose.
Posted By: DarthDaver (Guest) on December 26, 2009 at 11:11 PM
And I knows The Yeti was more like a mummy, but it's STILL not a man made of snow.
Posted By: DarthDaver (Guest) on December 26, 2009 at 11:27 PM
"I have another one to add to the list...Nature Boy Roger Kirby. He wrestled in the AWA around 1976 or 1977. I don't remember much else about him though. Does anybody else?"
Actually Kirby spent more time in various NWA territories than he ever did in the AWA, primarily in the Central States promotion. He was a big star there. He also jobbed and worked lower card matches quite frequently, as did some other workers that were big stars in other territories, for the S.F. territory in the late 60s. Where ever he was on the card he portrayed the arrogant heel role quite well. Check out the Central States forum on KayFabe Memories and you'll find out a lot more info on Kirby.
Posted By: cabronte (Guest) on December 27, 2009 at 11:35 AM
Yeah Macho was NEVER officially announced as part of the team only speculated. Here are some MORE Survivor Series Replacements
1993 - Four Doinks (granted we got MOM and Bushwhackers but anything not including Matt Borne, Steve Keirn, Steve Lombardi and Ray Apollo is false advertising. Becoming Captain Bam-Bam Bigelow, Bastion Booger and the Headshrikers vs Captain Butch, Luke, Men on A Mission
1995 Captain Skip, Jean Pierre Lafiette, Rad Radford, Tom Pritchard vs Captain Barry Horowitz, Avatar, Marty Jannetty , Hakushi was switched when DiBiase bought Lafiette's spot for the 1-2-3 Kid and Avatar character was dropped to make room for Bob Holly. Making the match Capt Skip, Kid,Rad Radford and Pritchard vs Capt Horowitz, Holly, Jannetty and Hakushi
2003 Scheduled to be Captain Brock Lesnar, A-Train, Matt Morgan, Nathan Jones and the Big Show vs Captain Kurt Angle, Bob Holly, Acolytes and Chris Benoit. Lesnars team did a number on Faarooq keeping him from Survivor Series and Lesnar and Heyman had tried to lure Cena to their team before settling on A Train. Cena joined Angles team as a replacement for Faarooq. Making Capt Lesnar,Train,Morgan,Jones,Show vs Capt Angle,Holly,Bradshaw,Cena,Benoit
2004 Carlito never officially competed as he left the arena before the bell rang
2006 was Supposed to be The Entire Spirit Squad vs Ric Flair Roddy Piper and legends to be named. They dropped Mitch and a legend. Making it Capt Kenny,Johnny,Mikey and Nicky vs Captain Ric Flair, Roddy Piper, Dusty Rhodes and Sgt Slaughter. Roddy was soon diagnosed with cancer making it Kenny,Johnny,Mikey,Nicky vs Flair,Sarge,Dusty,and Ron Simmons.
Posted By: Radtke (Guest) on December 27, 2009 at 02:19 PM
re: ropes - the explanation that's always made the most sense to me is that the wrestler holding onto the ropes was using them for leverage, which is illegal, much like when Flair applies a figure-four to his opponent and grabs the ropes for added leverage.
As for getting DQ'd in a "no-DQ" match, since when are cage matches no-DQ? I mean, sure they've always been treated as such, but are they ever actually announced as no-DQ? If you want to be technical about it, a cage match is a normal match inside a cage where the wrestlers can use the cage - that doesn't mean they can hit the ref and not be punished. Of course, this is professional wrestling, and the rules change whenever a company needs them to change to suit their needs. Kinda like when HBK and Marty Janetty were having a cage match where they had to escape the cage to win, except HBK went for a pin and Bill Alfonso jumped in to make the count, and from that day forward, cage matches in WWE have allowed pinfalls. Even the commentators at the time (I want to say Gorilla and Raven, but check the cage match dvd to be sure) were confused. Then there's WWE tag team cage matches, where sometimes both partners have to escape, sometimes one partner has to escape, sometimes all 4 wrestlers can fight at the same time, sometimes (rey & jeff vs punk & jericho is the most recent example, i think) they have to tag each other (if cage matches really are no-DQ, why bother tagging? because it suits WWE's needs for the night), etc. basically, as much as you might want to think there are rules in the WWE and that things have a possibility to make sense, sooner or later you have to accept that WWE doesn't even care, so why should we?
and speaking of no-DQ, that's always annoyed the crap out of me - no-DQ should only apply to the wrestlers involved, so if HHH and......randy orton were having a no-dq match, they could do whatever they wanted to each other, but if legacy interfered, HHH would win. Otherwise, why bother facing your opponent one on one? why not hire a few guys in the back to come out and help you win. If I was a heel, that's what I'd do. I'd be stupid if I didn't.
Posted By: Guest#1 (Guest) on December 28, 2009 at 03:53 PM
Copyright � 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.