411 Fact or Fiction 12.24.09: Final Resolution, Bret Hart vs. Hulk Hogan, Bashir and Dreamer's Departures and More!
Posted by Jeremy Thomas on 12.24.2009
Did Final Resolution deliver as TNA's last Pay-Per-View of the year? Will Bret Hart's WWE return have more impact than Hulk Hogan's first TNA appearance? Is it time to put an end to Feast or Fired? Are Shiek Abdul Bashir and Tommy Dreamer's departures losses for their respective companies? 411's Michael Bauer and Shawn Lealos debate these topics and more in the latest edition of 411 Wrestling Fact or Fiction!
Welcome to the Christmas week edition of 411 Wrestling Edition of Fact or Fiction! I'm your host Jeremy Thomas, and this week we have Final Resolution to talk about, as well as a few departures from the big two companies, one potential HUGE signing and a lot more! On our panel in their Holiday Finest we have my Movie Zone comrade Shawn Lealos who does the Three R's of the Movies, Alternate Takes and the TNA Pay-Per-View previews here in Wrestling Land. Doing verbal battle with him is none other than Michael Bauer, who does the ECW Report, the Wrestling Zone Top 5, Buy or Sell and the R's of ECW. Lots of news this week and our panelists are ready, so let's get down to it.
Questions were sent out Monday.
Participants were told to expect WWE & TNA-related questions.
1. Final Resolution delivered as TNA's final Pay-Per-View of the year.
Michael Bauer:FICTION. Yes, there were two four star matches at the end of the card, but outside of that, this was a pretty mediocre Pay-Per-View. Don't get me wrong, Angle vs. Wolfe and Styles vs. Daniels were insane matches, but it takes more than two matches to make a great show. Even as a good show, TNA didn't deliver the best of goods here. Starting at the top, The Guns facing the British Invasion was an okay opener, but the ending was screwy and it lacked for what The Guns can truly do. The Knockouts Title match was totally horrid. You would expect that out of Jenna and Sharmell, not Tara and ODB. The "Feast or Fired" match always never sat well with me, especially when three of the cases went to The World Elite. I'm sorry, but they are not the Main Event Mafia. At least Joe got a World Title shot, which makes the most sense of anything. The Elimination Match had all sorts of stupidity involved and I don't think it was as good as people are saying, which isn't much anyway. Last Man Standing was about as boring as the Ring of Honor Final Battle Main Event, just 50 minutes shorter. And then we have Raven and Stevie facing Abyss and Foley in a garbage brawl. While entertaining, this should not be the third best match on the card with everything else you had. So yeah, a decent show, but far from "delivering" by TNA.
Shawn Lealos:FACT. Chris Daniels vs. A.J. Styles and Kurt Angle vs. Desmond Wolfe makes it a great card. AJ/Daniels got 20+ minutes in a spectacular match while Kurt and Wolfe got almost 30 minutes. These are the kinds of PPV matches TNA used to always deliver. The Foley/Abyss vs. Raven/Stevie match delivered for the people who like hardcore brawls and at 10-minutes it was just the right length. I hated the fact there was no X-Division match (and Red was nowhere to be found) but the MCMG got over 10-minutes against the British Invasion which is always a good thing. I wanted to see MCMG get the belts but other than that I was very happy with the card.
Score: 0 for 1
2. The WWE's updates to its Wellness Policy over the last week are necessary moves to further legitimize the policy in the public's eyes.
Michael Bauer:FICTION. This is fiction on the basis that the WWE needed to legitimize the policy to the public in the first place. Let's be honest. The general public is sick and tired of all of this steroid bullshit, from legitimate sports like baseball and football to the worked art of sports entertainment. In pro baseball, do I care if a steroid user holds the Home Run record? Absolutely not. I understand about the long term effects and how people don't want kids who don't know any better to get started. I get that, but I'm also a fantasy baseball player and I want to see home run after home run smacked out of ballparks. Wrestling to me is no different. I, like most normal people, want to see great matches in the ring. I don't care about all the drama out of the ring, whether it be steroids or a wrestler's personal life. But yet, because Congress feels like they have to be involved in steroids and fixing College Football, this is the type of updates that were bound to happen. You know, because Congress has no real issues that actually matter, like the failing economy and a war in the Middle East that I don't even understand the reasons behind anymore.
Shawn Lealos:FICTION. Who cares? They have made the marijuana and alcohol updates and those don't matter. The steroids and pain killer addictions are what needs to be addressed and are what is killing the sport from the inside. Strengthening penalties on drinking and smoking pot will make no difference one way or the other in the public eye. Besides, when will anyone outside of wrestling fans and lawmakers ever care about the WWE Wellness policy?
Score: 1 for 2
3. TNA lost a valuable asset to the X-Division in Sheik Abdul Bashir.
Michael Bauer:FICTION. In order to even consider this to be a fact, you have to assume the X-Division has any value in the first place, which it hasn't in quite some time. Now, while Bashir was a nice commodity, he was far from a valuable asset to the X-Division. Yes, he held the title, but I can't remember the last time he was relevant to TNA, let alone the division. And yes, while a challenger has disappeared for Amazing Red, I wonder where he disappeared to anyway. Unless I'm mistaken, I didn't see Amazing Red at the Pay Per View last weekend. The same can be said for Homicide, who has been going after him and his title lately. Which makes the X-Division pretty irrelevant right now and anyone associated with it right now is pretty much the same.
Shawn Lealos:FICTION. What the hell has Bashir done recently? He has become a jobber with Kiyoshi and they are dead weight at this point in their TNA careers. Also, the X-Division title was not even defended on the last PPV which is a crime. The X-Division is always what made TNA different and now it is being ignored. Bashir can't be a valuable asset to a division that doesn't seem to matter anymore. I think he needs to be Shawn Daivari again and go to Ring of Honor or Dragon Gate USA to hone his skills some more.
Score: 2 for 3
4. It's well past time to put an end to the Feast or Fired match.
Michael Bauer:FICTION. At first, I was going to say fact, and then I realized that TNA has opened all the cases already and there is no confusion or false hype or wondering this year, which I think is a first. The Feast or Fired concept is great because it sets up your natural feuds, without having to try and find a reason for them. For example, Samoa Joe now has a guaranteed TNA Heavyweight Title shot. You don't need to bring in any cheap angles or past history of a wrestler's personal life to hype a feud with AJ Styles or Kurt Angle or whoever has the title. It's as simple as I have the shot, I want to take it then, and build from there. Or if Joe goes the cheap route and gets one of those CM Punk style victories, the chase back to Joe has built itself. Likewise, the same can be done for the Tag Team Titles or the X-Division Title, if they care to not make it a joke. It was just the nonsense of the cases going back and forth with nobody knowing what was in them that needed to put to an end and it was.
Shawn Lealos:FACT. I HATE, HATE, HATE, HATE this match. I don't mind the briefcases because with every title represented it makes it just different enough from the Money in the Bank match. However, it is the Fired portion that I really hate. The fact that a person who wins a briefcase gets fired is ridiculous. Why is a winner getting fired? I know the reasons can be to eliminate talent that wants to go (Petey, Bashir) but why would Chris Daniels lose the match twice? The Fired stipulation is the dumbest in professional wrestling. This match needs to die.
Score: 2 for 4
SWITCH!
5. Bringing Lance Cade back on SmackDown would be a benefit both for Cade and Friday Nights.
Shawn Lealos:FACT. This is one of those old Faction questions. This is a great move for Lance Cade because he would be getting his next chance to succeed in the WWE. It has nothing to do one way or the other with SmackDown, though. His return will not help or hurt the show. Because that is a neutral statement and his return is good for him, that makes it more fact than fiction. I have always seen some Barry Windham in Cade and that could be a great thing if used right.
Michael Bauer:FICTION. I definitely think it will benefit Lance Cade as he will be back on mainstream television. I have no clue what his gimmick would be, but you would have to assume it wouldn't bury him like Scotty Goldman did for Colt Cabana. But I question how much it would benefit SmackDown. Sure, Friday Night needs another big name to get in the midcard scene and the main event, but this is the show that should also be expecting Edge any time now to partially fill that void in the main event. So if Lance Cade comes into the midcard fold, where does he go? Does he feud with Morrison, assuming he gets back the IC Title? Or is he the new face to go after McIntyre? I think a lot of these questions would need to answered first before I can truly answer this question.
Score: 2 for 5
6. Bringing Mark Madden on as an announcer to replace Taz would be the worst move TNA has made in quite some time.
Shawn Lealos:FACT. Mark Madden is an idiot and is annoying on the same levels as Don West. Taz is one of the best color men working today (although Matt Striker has passed him by) and his contributions to the TNA broadcast makes them so much better than they used to be. If Madden came in, Mike Tenay would revert back to the annoying shill he was with West sitting with him. I don't entirely blame West for his commentating because I think he was made worse by Tenay's continued failings as an announcer. Hell, Tenay could make Tony Schiavoni look good when he is with Don West. Now Taz has leveled the talk team back to a respectable level that is actually interesting to listen to. Madden would be worse than West was.
Michael Bauer:FACT. A GAZZLON TIMES FACT! Listen, I don't care how good of an announcer you have to replace Taz, you will be making a mistake for one simple reason. Bringing on Taz to replace Don West was the BEST move TNA has made since they went to television four years ago. So to replace him, after a few months, is completely asinine. And we are talking about a company that has done some pretty dumb things in the past year or two. There was god knows how many "Something on a Pole" matches that all sucked. There was the complete failure of Hernandez's push and the wacked out one of Samoa Joe's Nation of Violence. Oh and let us not forget Joe's horrific title reign that almost killed whatever momentum he ever had. There was the entire TNA Victory Road Pay Per View, especially the match between two people who don't wrestle. I think I've made my point and all of that pales in comparison to what taking Taz off the announcing team would be. It would show that you made a mistake bringing in Taz, which it wasn't, because Don West is god awful and Taz is one of the best commentators around today and probably the best outside of the WWE.
Score: 3 for 6
7. It will be a shame to see Tommy Dreamer, the last of the ECW Originals, leave the company.
Shawn Lealos:FICTION. I said my goodbyes to ECW a long time ago. Tommy Dreamer is the last man standing in a federation that has nothing to do with what ECW was all about. I honestly wish they would change the name and let ECW rest in peace. Tommy Dreamer would be better as a road agent in TNA or working behind the scenes in Ring of Honor than as the character he has been portraying in the WWE the last few years (his title reign included).
Michael Bauer:FICTION. It would have been a shame had Tommy Dreamer left before getting a token run with the ECW Championship in the WWE. The reality is, Tommy Dreamer is much better off not being an active wrestler right now as there is really nothing left for him to do. And yes, he had better than average microphone skills, but his in ring work has been lacking lately. As much I wish I could say it was due to him not caring, I know that is not the case, because Tommy Dreamer is the blood, sweat, and tears that are left in the ring. The problem is, when ECW has only about a dozen guys and you are not featured even every other week on the show, you know it is time to move on. While it is disappointing that he is finally leaving in the company, this was just another thing that was bound to happen and it is just time to move on.
Score: 4 for 7
8. Assuming the rumors are true, Bret Hart returning to the WWE on January 4th will have more impact that Hulk Hogan appearing on TNA.
Shawn Lealos:FACT. Hulk Hogan has come back so many times over the years that his appearance anywhere isn't as big of a deal as it once was. Yes, it is TNA's biggest acquisition but so many people believe he will hurt more than he helps that his eventual appearance will be filled with as many positives as negatives. I think more people want to know how Hogan will screw up TNA than anything. However, Bret Hart returning is a HUGE deal. Hart has only been seen twice in McMahan land since he left the WWE, once for his interviews on the DVD and the second time for his HOF appearance. Only one of those was on TV. Bret Hart has stayed out of the public eye for a long time now and people want to see him back. Look at the pop his entrance video got when Shawn Michaels pulled the prank a few years back. People want to see Bret Hart much more than they want to see Hulk Hogan at this time. I am a TNA fan and was planning on watching it live on Jan. 4 over the WWE but if Bret Hart returns, I will end up DVR-ing TNA instead.
Michael Bauer:FACT. Yeah, I'm saying this because of the pure difference between Hulk Hogan appearing on TNA and Bret Hart appearing in the WWE. Hulk Hogan on TNA might seem incredibly surreal, but we have seen plenty of Hogan promos and press conferences on TNA programming already, so the shock value isn't there anymore. However, Bret Hart showing on January 4th, or any show, even if announced a week in advance, will be so insane because there isn't one WWE fan who ever, EVER, though they would see Bret Hart in a WWE ring again. So tuning into Raw for that week, also being the first week without Monday Night Football in 16 weeks, would be more than easy and the motivation is right there for them. Now while seeing Hogan in an TNA ring is out of this world also, keep in mind that we are talking about a guy who has whored out his entire family, leading to his divorce, his insanity, and his need to do something to get an income. He needs to be in TNA when the WWE doesn't have a reason to bring him in. BERT HART DOESN'T NEED THE WWE!!! And that is the biggest difference between the two appearances and why I am much more excited to see if Bret Hart comes back to the WWE. Just please don't have him wrestle a match with his condition.
Final Score: 5 for 8
Shawn and Michael go just over .500 this week with a 5 for 8 finish! Thanks to both of them for their responses, and thanks to you our readers for checking out what we had to say! Enjoy your holidays, whatever they may be, and come back next week for more 411 Wrestling Fact or Fiction!
Remember to go to TigerFlashGames.com and play addictive, free flash games when you're bored at work, school, or whenever! If I had any time at my work, you'd find me there all the damn time!
i think people are really over estimateing bret harts drawing power
he is just no where near as big of star as hogen
Posted By: gfdfh (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 11:31 PM
putting taz on comentary was the best move tna made since appearing on spike!?!?!?!?
my god am i the only guy on this site who ACTUALLY watches tna????
Posted By: dolla316 (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 11:39 PM
Mr Bauer, I'm glad you just want some entertainment from wrestling. Doesn't matter if they are downing steroids or not, so long as you're entertained.
Posted By: Mike (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 11:41 PM
i want the rock
Posted By: wylun (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 11:46 PM
Define Irony, Last Question is about Bret Hart and the 2 doing Fact or Fiction this week just happen to be Shawn Michael!!! LMAO!
Posted By: Leon (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 11:49 PM
Who the F is "Bert Hart?"
Posted By: GreatManForever (Registered) on December 24, 2009 at 12:00 AM
Why does everyone seem to forget Bret's appearance on RAW in 2007? It was in vignette form, but he was working out in a gym, looking pretty good actually. It was on McMahon Appreciation Night, the same night Vince blew up in a limo.
And Bret said a bunch of nasty shit about him. It was scripted, I'm sure but it was still funny.
Posted By: Norm Peterson (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 12:05 AM
I'm sure Dreamer will share his true feelings about ECW, now that he's done kissing Vince's ass
Posted By: Guest#8579 (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 12:10 AM
While I do believe Bret Hart is the second best wrestler of all time after Ric Flair, Hulk Hogan is the most famous wrestler of all time, period.
His return to the game will bring in new viewers- wheras there is a set limit of people (including me) who will tune in to watch the Hitman for his rather limited series of appearances.
To be perfectly honest Hogan remains an Icon in American pop culture as the success of his and his daughter's reality shows have shown. If anything is going to regrow the fanbase this business has to offer- and draw back the multitudes of fans that have left due to the WWE's focus on youth demographics, it's going to be a man who brings nostalgia to former fans and their children who have yet to be exposed to what pro wrestling is. Now it's up to TNA to keep these viewers once Hogan draws them in, but comparing marketability, promotional machinations, merchandising and sheer drawing power anywhere outside of Canada- it's really not even close.
Posted By: The Weesel (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 12:21 AM
Who's Bert Hart?
Posted By: Ernie Hart (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 12:23 AM
Of course Bret returning to WWE will have more impact than Hogan on TNA... At least Bret can still move around the ring, not like Hogan busting his hip if he does a *choke* leg-drop
Posted By: Guest#4438 (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 12:31 AM
i think people are really over estimateing bret harts drawing power
he is just no where near as big of star as hogen
Posted By: gfdfh (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 11:31 PM
I think TNA has proven that they can KILL anybody's drawing power with their lack of intrigue...never underestimate intrgue, which Bret Hart would most certainly bring to the table
Posted By: Erik... (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 12:34 AM
Learn to spell Hogan before you ever speak the words of Bret Hart.. I can turn on brooke knows best to see Hulk Hogan or as you say hogen.
Posted By: sahk (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 12:36 AM
"BERT HART DOESN'T NEED THE WWE!!!"
I agree.
Posted By: smartass (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 12:37 AM
i think people overrate bret hart. if memory serves me right, the wwe was doing pretty bad with bret as champion. in no way is he a bigger draw than The Hulkster. Bret just isnt enough to cover up the fact that the wwe is stale as hell!!
Posted By: rick goodwin (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 12:42 AM
**********
i think people are really over estimateing bret harts drawing power
he is just no where near as big of star as hogen
**********
I think you're under-estimating Hart's importance compared to Hogan's. Here's some simple facts -
1. Fans that aren't watching now will not be brought back by Hogan. Anyone interested in Hogan knows that this is not a one-shot appearance, and they'll wait to read the reviews to see if he's bringing in all the decrepit senior citizens from the 80's. They'll watch Raw instead. Why?
2. Fans that aren't watching now, but remember how Bret Hart left WWE *WILL* tune in to Raw to see what will happen. This is (as far as many of them think) a one-time appearance. The net geeks know it's a build-up to Mania, but the average fan will tune in thinking this is their one chance to see Hart again, knowing that they can see Hogan's broken-down carcass any week on TNA.
Posted By: Scott B (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 12:45 AM
To the mainstream media (which ultimatly is more important for new viewers) TNA wins hands down. But for the wrestling fans WWE wins. Bret Hart will not draw in any new viewers cause nobody knows who the hell he is! Hogan has been in the news forever....FOREVER! When asked at work what kind of wrestling I enjoy people ask...real wrestling or like Hulk Hogan? Nobody EVER has asked like Bret Hart wrestling! I am a WWE fan for life but they are totally over estimating this whole ordeal!
Posted By: hart for life (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 12:49 AM
Raw will beat TNA's Monday show, but Bret Hart - as cool as it would be to see him on Raw will not aid to the fight. Hogan might get TNA past a 1.5 if that. His show on the County Music Network actually did fairly good, and I'm sad they didn't launch a second season.
Of course, I personally don't want to see Hogan as a personality/booker - I want to see him wrestle. Old and crippled or not, and I may be watching Raw live due to that.
Posted By: fg76 (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 12:49 AM
I'm with gfdfh...Among fans who already watch Raw and Impact every week, Bret Hart will have a bigger impact.
But who gives a shit!
Maybe Hogan's return is a success, maybe not. But Hart does not have half of the Huckster's name recognition.
Posted By: Ronnie (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 12:52 AM
i think people are really over estimateing bret harts drawing power
he is just no where near as big of star as hogen
Posted By: gfdfh (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 11:31 PM
We'll see
Posted By: A-Ron (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 12:53 AM
Bret Hart was actually on WWE TV a third time in that time frame, as he was on the Mr. McMahon Appreciation Night gimmick, talking trash about Vince.
Posted By: Blackbird 13 (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 01:05 AM
BERT HART? Very distant relation to Bret?
Posted By: DVR (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 01:07 AM
i think people are really over estimateing bret harts drawing power
he is just no where near as big of star as hogen
Posted By: gfdfh (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 11:31 PM
true but hogan we see all the time. he never shies away from the spotlight. the only new thing is that he is in a new company. bret on the other hand has been in a hiatus for 12 years. It will be interesting to see what he brings to the table.
Posted By: 2frsh 37 (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 01:08 AM
I dig how they talk about Bret and their names are Shawn and Michael. Clever!
Posted By: JasonP (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 01:12 AM
i think people are really over estimateing bret harts drawing power
he is just no where near as big of star as hogen
Posted By: gfdfh (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 11:31 PM
Your right. If Bret was such a huge draw, how come his era as tog guy is considered the low point of the company since 1983? His biggest contributions to the business were putting over Steve Austin and the Screwjob, which indirectly lead to the Attitude Era. Outside of Canada, he's not really that relevant anymore.
Posted By: Guest#4132 (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 01:14 AM
i think people are really over estimateing bret harts drawing power
he is just no where near as big of star as hogen
Posted By: gfdfh (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 11:31 PM
Yeah but we haven't seen Bret Hart in a WWE ring since 97 and wrestling ring since 99 or 00
the last time we really saw bret was at the 2006 hall of fame.
while he isn't as interesting as the Rock. A number of fans, especially older ones would love to see Bret once more.
He wasn't Mr. draw but he held the company during its darkest days where he really was the WWF cause damn near everything else was crap
Posted By: Guest#0985 (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 01:15 AM
I guess you people are forgetting that the people who actually gave a fuck about Bret Hart stopped watching years ago. You think these 8 year olds give a flying fuck about Bret Hart? Sure, we "older" fans care, but Bret Hart hasn't been on mainstream wrestling TV in damn near 10 years. Most of the E's current fans weren't even BORN.
Posted By: Industry (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 01:16 AM
"BERT HART DOESN'T NEED THE WWE!!!"
VINTAGE BAUER!
Posted By: panik (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 01:18 AM
To wrestling fans, Bret Hart is an ICON. To the casual fan, they don't know of Bret the way they know of Hogan. Most fans today may not know of the Montreal screwjob. Hell, some of these fans may not remember the Rock or SCSA.
I don't know which program will score the better ratings. As for me, I'll be watching TNA and DVR'ing the WWE.
Posted By: TNA Mark (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 01:20 AM
I agree, hogen is the biggest draw in the history of the business.
Posted By: Guest1111 (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 01:29 AM
"BERT HART DOESN'T NEED THE WWE!!!
Bert Hart?
Posted By: Shane Michaels (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 01:32 AM
Fuck Bret Hart!
When are we going to get BERT Hart?!
Posted By: AngryTas (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 01:33 AM
the two legends impacted will both be negated with no results.
bret hart, greatest of his era, will be returning to a raw audience saturated with kids who werent alive to see his last wwf match. the smarts will tune in but the casual fan will wonder who is the old guy in the ring.
hogan, greatest of his generation, going to a show that continues to make horrible booking decisions. casual fans will tune in but the smarts will not.
thus the desired effect of both shows is a push.
Posted By: rey (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 01:34 AM
What was wrong with Don West for the last couple of years? He learned the moves, and he was GENUINELY excited calling the matches. I'm an ROH fan and I'd rather listen to West be excited than Dave Prazak's overrated whining
Posted By: S Dot (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 01:39 AM
I don't understand why anyone cares if WWE stars are on the juice. Why should Congress get involved with it at all? It's not a real sport - there's no gambling to protect! It's entertainment - if someone wants to roid up to be a bigger monster, let them! Nobody cries about the children when some chick gets a boob job to be more appealing on TV.
Posted By: Rod Oracheski (Registered) on December 24, 2009 at 01:40 AM
Hogan is a past star for the masses.
Bret is a past star for those who like to watch wrestling.
It'll be interesting to watch the ratings, immediately and for the weeks following, but my bet is on Bret. Vince knows how to hype this return. TNA, unfortunately, does not know how to hype Hogan's return. I believe that's a fundamental difference between those who understand the business and those who don't (although I don't claim to, I just watch the stuff).
Posted By: rbryce (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 01:47 AM
Yeah
Bret's a bigger star than Hogan.. How many times has Hogan Been on the Simpsons?
NONE
How many times has Bret Hart been on the Simpsons?
Once "ewww this place has old man stink"
Bret > Hogan
Posted By: The Rev (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 01:48 AM
Bret Harts pop is going to blow the roof off the place. Hogan=Tired same old shit
Posted By: Jason (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 01:50 AM
gfdfh yes hogan is a bigger name but as the report says every one has seen hulk hogan comeback to wrestling thousands of times the last couple of years from the hall of fame too WM21 attacking hassan and saving hornswoggle to fighting michaels and orton Bret hart has made one appareance in television and one on DVD in the WWE a company he hated after the screwjob
but also remember hogan is a showman not an actual wrestler and hart is a professional wrestler plus the story that is rumored to have him fight against vince seems intesting now hogan has been everywhere in the bret hart will be in the WWE for the first time (in a ring ) since the screwjob
Posted By: halomo81 (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 01:51 AM
gfdfh is right, younger casual fans don't even know who Bret Hart is.
Posted By: poffo316 (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 01:55 AM
BERT SCREWED BERT!
... and then Ernie.
Posted By: MOAV5706 (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 02:04 AM
Hogan may be the bigger star but People havn't seen Bret in a WWE ring for 12 years, as a performer or entertainer, that wins easy sorry to say, As a Hogan Mark id still rather see Bret and how he functions with Vince Shawn and Hunter over Hogans act on TNA.
Posted By: ChrisA (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 02:07 AM
You got to be kidding me.... Hogan is old news. Nobody cares about Hogans old routine anymore. People haven't got the chance to be sick of Hart. I had planned on watching TNA over RAW but if Hart is on RAW, there is no way I am going to miss that.
Posted By: Jerr Bear (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 02:11 AM
You have got to be kidding me. Hogan drawing more over Bret.. No way... People are sick of Hogans old routine. We have not seen Bret in ages. We(the people)miss Bret. I want to agree with Shawn on this one. If Bret is on RAW the same day that Hogan is on TNA, no way am I going to miss Bret.
Posted By: Guest#3551 (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 02:14 AM
I can't imagine Hogan having even a little bit of long-term drawing power at this point, so his coming in to TNA won't be much of a boon, and will probably destroy them in the long run just like it did to WCW.
But it's hard to see a Bret Hart return to WWE meaning all that much either, considering that their target audience these days hadn't even been born yet when the Montreal incident happened.
Posted By: Bruce L (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 02:32 AM
Whatever Michael B. says, I think the opposite ;)
Posted By: y2josh (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 02:33 AM
Michael Bauer talks to much. This is the 2nd Fact or Fiction I have read with him in it and I gotta say...it sucks. He gives to much useless opinion and never really answers his own questions. I like the Fact or Fictions, but with him writing is just horrible.
There were some great points made in this column. I believe IF Brett is appearing at the Jan 4th Raw, best believe TNA is going down. But, I'm a huge TNA fan and have supported them since day 1. I want to see them succeed, so let's hope they do it right this time. You have the talent...now do something about it!
Posted By: Jo Dogg75 (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 02:35 AM
TNA is so second rate that even if Bret wasn't coming on, they would still draw a pathetic rating. Hell, even if Raw wasn't on that night, TNA would be lucky to get a 2.0
Posted By: Guest#6335 (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 02:38 AM
Why has everyone who writes for 411mania fallen in love with the word "surreal" this week?
Posted By: Michael Tyner (Registered) on December 24, 2009 at 02:52 AM
Wrestling fans want to see Bret Hart, alot of people are turned off by the WWE but this could get them to watch again even if for a few months if this is done right. Even people that used to watch wrestling will want to watch this, they can't just go over to VH1 and see Bret being an idiot(something he isn't). Hogan is over exposed and everybody is tired of him. He's a big star that has worn out his welcome on TV.
Posted By: midcard madness (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 02:53 AM
i think people are really over estimateing bret harts drawing power
he is just no where near as big of star as hogen
Posted By: gfdfh (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 11:31 PM
Makes no difference, especially since that wasn't the question. Bigger name as he might be, Hogan suffers overexposure as we've seen him come back time and time again (as stated above), whereas Bret hasn't officially been seen since leaving WCW a looong time ago and sort of left his fans wanting more (it never felt right that Bret didn't finish his career in the WWF/E).
In a way, Hart returning to WWE is like Hogan's return to WWF in 2002, it's going to be very interesting to see how he'll react / interact with people after bad blood (McMahon? Shawn Michaels? etc).
Posted By: Shannon (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 02:57 AM
Michael has me intrigued about this "Bert Hart". Will he becoming on Jan. 4th as well?
Posted By: Johnny Israel (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 03:09 AM
THANK YOU for acknowledging in the article that Bret is only RUMORED to be appearing on Raw. I've yet to see any article posted claiming that Bret has signed a contract. Too many people are jumping the gun.
Posted By: Guest#3247 (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 03:19 AM
Bret isn't enough to make me watch RAW. RAW sucks so much ass I don't think I'll watch it at all in 2010 unless someone seriously recommended an episode.
Posted By: puffykilled2pac (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 03:49 AM
Who's Bert Hart??
Posted By: Big Poo Johnson (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 04:24 AM
"Define Irony, Last Question is about Bret Hart and the 2 doing Fact or Fiction this week just happen to be Shawn Michael!!! LMAO!
Posted By: Leon (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 11:49 PM"
How is that ironic?
Posted By: His Bubbliness (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 04:34 AM
Why does everyone seem to forget Bret's appearance on RAW in 2007? It was in vignette form, but he was working out in a gym, looking pretty good actually. It was on McMahon Appreciation Night, the same night Vince blew up in a limo.
And Bret said a bunch of nasty shit about him. It was scripted, I'm sure but it was still funny.
Posted By: Norm Peterson (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 12:05 AM
----------------------------------------
No one forgets that its just that there were many fans (myself included) who tuned in that night in hopes of seeing Bret....I also tuned in the night Trump was on thinking that Bret was going to make an appearance.... I have watched two Raws live in the last 10 years and it looks like Jan 4th will be number 3 if these rumors continue......Hopefully Bret swerves us all and shows up at the Impact Zone
Posted By: BRETisWrestling (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 04:38 AM
The Feast of Fired match sucks to the limit. The reason is that it makes no sense at all. I saw many times in the match where someone could grab a briefcase, but didn't even attempt to. These briefcases are held so low that the match looks like a complete joke, compared to Money in the Bank. And this statement is coming from a day 1 TNA fan, not to despise them, but because I want them to succeed.
Posted By: Irfan (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 05:26 AM
think people overrate bret hart. if memory serves me right, the wwe was doing pretty bad with bret as champion. in no way is he a bigger draw than The Hulkster. Bret just isnt enough to cover up the fact that the wwe is stale as hell!!
Posted By: rick goodwin (Guest)
Ya, Hogans tour of Australia is doing great sin't it? Almost half filled bingo halls. Moron.
Posted By: Guest#4564 (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 06:05 AM
I don't find Hart interesting and I bought his dvd set knowing that there is a great documentary and some amazing matches and the doc just fell flat for me,I don't know wheter I wasn't in the mood to watch it or what,he just came across REALLY monotone to me
Posted By: Str8EdgeCoop (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 06:10 AM
i like them both, but i do really think that hogan coming back is much bigger than hart coming back. we all complain about hogan being a crap wrestler, but at least he STILL can wrestle, which is what the sport we are watching is called. its not called, "i cant wrestle so im coming back to talk about things only 15% of the audience know about".
Posted By: hardcore (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 06:11 AM
"Who the F is "Bert Hart?"
a better man then you will ever be
Posted By: Darth Mortis (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 06:18 AM
another thing, why are the bret hart photos on here always of him in his prime, but the h ogan ones are more recent. surely thats decieving to some people, because when a grey old man hobbles out, they going to think, wait thats not bret, i thought he had black hair
Posted By: hardcore (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 06:19 AM
The fact remains, current wrestling fans have chosen their sides. Hulk Hogan brings the oppurtunity for NEW fans. If you're flipping thru the channels, you see a wrestling program, and there's an old guy on it. Do you stop for a guy that will probably be wearing a vintage t-shirt and MAYBE pink glasses to the ring? Or do you, as a tv viewer, NOT AS A WRESTLING FAN, stop to watch HULK HOGAN????
Look, I love Bret Hart. Any video game that has the hitman already knows who i'm choosing to play as. I know Hulk Hogan's a douche. You know it. Hulk knows it. Bret Hart knows it and even BERT Hart knows it. But, as a TNA fan, I'm watching Impact and MAY watch AM Raw or a DVR of RAW.
As far as wrestling fans go, it's a wash. As far as tv viewers with no affiliation with a wrestling company, TNA wins. WWE will have a higher rating, but TNA will gain viewers ten-fold over WWE.
Posted By: huh? (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 06:57 AM
Obviously Bret Hart will have more importance, WWE should he hyping the crap out of the controversy of the "Screwjob."
I don't remember Hogan doing much for the ratings in WWE when he was last appearing on Smackdown. He's not going to pull enough ratings out his ass to beat WWE on Jan 4th.
I'll be tuning into Raw mainly because I only watch TNA for Nigel aka Desmond Wolfe, and I know for a fact he's going to be playing second fiddle on Jan 4th.
Posted By: Rizo (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 07:03 AM
I barely keep up with wrestling anymore on TV. I knew Hogan was comming to TNA in January but I never even heard a Hart rumor untill now. I will be watching TNA Monday, so thats my answer
Posted By: Shane (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 07:18 AM
Maybe Hogan will show up on TNA and get busted open from another slap across the face from Ric Flair? LOL.
Posted By: worthythorn (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 07:19 AM
Sorry Shawn, but how can anyone take any of your opinions seriously when you claim smoking pot and drinking aren't a big deal and don't really matter? Are you serious? That's honestly one of the most laughable things I've ever heard.
Posted By: SummerDogg7 (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 07:32 AM
i think people are really over estimateing bret harts drawing power
he is just no where near as big of star as hogen
Posted By: gfdfh (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 11:31 PM
Only The Ultimate Warrior is allowed to say "HO-GEN".
Posted By: Devin (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 07:49 AM
I am laughing so much about BERT HART that I am in pain
Posted By: ernie (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 08:11 AM
Define Irony, Last Question is about Bret Hart and the 2 doing Fact or Fiction this week just happen to be Shawn Michael!!! LMAO!
Posted By: Leon (Guest) on December 23, 2009 at 11:49 PM
Great catch, love the Irony!!!
But seriously, Brett does have the draw power to make the rateing go sky high. At least his first appearance, depending on how the WWE use Brett will determine rather or not that draw is long term. I just hope they don't have him in a wrestling match, as much as I would love to see the best there is, the best there was and the best there ever will be wrestle again; I jsut don't think it would be wise for him to do so in his case. Wise for the E to put him in a match, he could deffinately teach the younger talent a thing or two! But that doesn't mean he can't slap the sharpshooter on Vince!!!
Posted By: Dan (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 08:12 AM
can the stars of the 80's and 90's just fucking retire already? what is bret coming back goin gto do for them in the long run? are they gonna give him the belt? stay home, hitman
Posted By: pjl (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 08:19 AM
Didn't Bert Hart wrestle at Summerfest?
Posted By: The Legend (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 08:36 AM
Bert SCREWED Bert damnit!
Don West>>>>>>>>Tazzzzzz
Posted By: Jake Fury (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 08:37 AM
Bert Hart v The Show v Kobe Johnston at Summerfest 2010!!! BOOK IT VINCE!!!!
Posted By: Louwax (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 08:52 AM
Bert Hart?
The alcohol and marijuana policies are just stupid. I understand they don't want people going all Sandman in their off hours, but these aren't the REAL issues at all.
Also, with Marijuana being only a 25k fine it means that top tier guys (Orton) can freely smoke all they want and just take a small hit in their PPV pay while guys lower down the ladder have to be very careful... which is crazy when you consider more than 20% of states in this country now consider marijuana a medicine.
Posted By: Guest#9154 (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 08:57 AM
Are you kidding?
Millions of fans will tune in to see Bret appear on Raw. The Mcmahon/HBK intrigue alone will be a huge draw.
Hogan, on the other hand, is completely useless to professional wrestling and has been ever since that other screwjob that happened a month later after Bret's.
Since then, Hogan has done nothing but tank ratings, buyrates and gate attendance for any organization who would have him.
Hogan's TNA involvement will do NOTHING to benefit the company. He simply is not a draw anymore. No one is going to tune in to see him and many may even change the channel whenever he's on screen.
Posted By: COTD (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 09:02 AM
Tough call. I'm a huge Bret Hart fan but I too worry that his importance will be lost on WWE's pre pubecent audience. If you think that 60% of the WWE's live audience is maybe under 16, the only way they'll know of Bret is "that guy who you can unlock on Smackdown".
Ofcourse, while we may be overestimating Bret's drawing power, you can't underestimate McMahon's marketing power. He could make Vicera's return something special if he truly wanted to :D.
I have all faith that Bret's return will upstage Hogan's, and while the core audience may be younger, just look at the reaction Bret's music got in Calgary when Sgt. Slaughter was GM.
Posted By: John (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 09:05 AM
who cares about these younger fans, these younger fans are what helped bury wrestling, and help bury some of these message boards.
Posted By: sahk (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 09:50 AM
To all the posters who like to point out every error.
BERT HART DOESN'T NEED THE WWE!!!
You all Fail Bauer rules Merry Christmas.
Posted By: guest666 (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 09:52 AM
Bret Hart has had...
- An article weekly in a newspaper in Canada
- A Simpsons appearance
Hulk Hogan has had...
- Rocky 3
- Thunder in Paradise
- A ton of bad to semi-passable movies
- His reality show
- CCW
It's easy to say due to all the mainstream appearances Hogan won't be as much a draw but picture The Rock coming back...would he still outdraw Bret despite the fact he's always in the public eye? We all know the answer is yes.
Posted By: RDR (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 10:06 AM
>>However, it is the Fired portion that I really hate. The fact that a person who wins a briefcase gets fired is ridiculous. Why is a winner getting fired?
It's a gamble match. And you're a dumbass.
You have to assume the kayfabe that everyone in the match wanted to be in the match. You have a 3/4 chance of getting an automatic title shot of any type. Either you win by getting a case, or you lose by continuing to wallow in the mid- to undercard. If you get the case, it's worth that one chance that you might be fired to get one of three title shots.
Me, I like the match. Probably because I understand it.
Posted By: Nate (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 10:09 AM
"Will Bret Hart's WWE return have more impact..." should be changed to , "WOULD Bret Hart's WWE return..."
way to reel us in a-holes.
Posted By: A sucker (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 10:11 AM
Look point blank, current fans will watch for cena as usual and the older fans from the 90's will watch because of bret, now you combine that and you get a good rating for raw, i predict raw will atleast do a 4.0 or over and lets be real, impact is gonna do nowhere near that, i can see them do 1.2 at very best, maybe, MAYBE if their lucky, they might get close to cracking 2.0 but for all you people who actually believe hogan is the answer to tna's problems and the guy whose gonna bring them to the top are idiots period, this is a different time period for hogan, for god sake he cant even wrestle anymore, most of the wrestling fans these days are kids and i can gurantee you NONE of those kids are gonna watch tna on january 4th, most of the rey mysterio/cena/dx loving kids you talk to never even heard of tna or just dont like watching it
Posted By: eddie (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 10:13 AM
No one is overestimating Bret Hart and saying he's a bigger star than Hogan of course he isn't.But as said above we haven't seen Bret on a wrestling program since Nitro in 2000 it's been 10 years we've seen Hogan back and forth in wwe plus him jumping to rival competion has already been done a la 1994?So it comes as no shock he'll jump to another organization just to STICK it to Vince.Coupled with the fact that NO ONE thought they see the day Bret would be back in WWE ring as a matter fact if you asked somebody a few months ago most people would probably think you would see Hogan return to wwe and Bret go to tna the way he claimed he couldn't deal with Vince.Oh btw (to Shawn Lealos)that big pop he got a few years back when Shawn pulled that prank in '05 they were in CANADA!Not only that MONTREAL of COURSE they're gonna give him a pop.Not that he's not gonna get a BIG POP anyway but come on that's Canada we all know how they feel about Bret and other hometown heros!
Posted By: Kyle (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 10:14 AM
It's the evil Hart twin, Bert Hart!
Posted By: Dustin (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 10:17 AM
People just need to buy a dvr, BC who really wants to watch wrestling live?... Except maybe ppv's
Posted By: Guest#7749 (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 10:25 AM
Hogan's appearance will have the impact of a soft penis. TNA is garbage.
Posted By: Guest#2015 (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 10:44 AM
West was way funnier than Taz.
Hogan is bigger than Hart, but the wwe has more zombies (who don't even know the Hitman), so of course they will win the "ratings-battle".
oh, and where is the Rock, huh? was the wwe too second- or third-rate for him? oh, yes, it was.
good man.
Posted By: tully (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 10:58 AM
"I know the reasons can be to eliminate talent that wants to go (Petey, Bashir) ..."
I think I read this in the FR preview, too. Petey was "fired" after losing in the Off the Wagon Challenge. The only time he got a case, he wound up cashing in the X Title shot and beat Lethal.
Posted By: boxman37 (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 11:26 AM
So, all these people giving Bret grief for being the company's top guy when WWF was extra struggling...the argument could be made that Shawn Michaels was also the "Go To Guy" in that era. Couldn't it? Do I need to bring up the Wrestlemania where Sid and Michaels headlined? Blech.
Posted By: Really? (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 11:28 AM
Bert Hart FTW!!!!!!!!!!
Posted By: Joe (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 11:41 AM
Maybe to wrestling fans that have been watching since 1998 Hart is interesting, but I have been watching since before then also and I don't give a damn about him.
Hogan is far more intriquing to me then Bret "**" Hitman.
Posted By: johnny rock (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 12:04 PM
People saying Bret wasn't a draw are really f'ing clueless and don't grasp how popular he was back then, even if it was a good part outside the US or that before he left he was by far the company's most over heel (in the US anyway). Sure when he was a top guy the company was at its lowest point but to blame that on him is ridiculous.
Shawn was at the top too for a good part of that so where's the blame for him? They're not in control of all the horrible gimmicks that elevated no one and stupidity that was going on creavtively. If anything, Bret AND Shawn were responsible for the WWF not going out of business in the mid-90s. Oh then you had Diesel/Kevin Nash's year long title reign of complete and total boredom that bombed harder than Hiroshima. If Bret isn't a draw then neither was Shawn or any of his old Clique buddies during their WWE time.
Posted By: PHOENIXZERO (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 12:27 PM
Oh, as for Hogan.... He's completely and utterly overexposed the days of him having any sort of drawing power ended in the late 90s. TNA's going to be lucky the pull in half their usual rating going head to head with WWE.
Posted By: PHOENIXZERO (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 12:29 PM
Remember when Goldberg kicked Bret Hart in the head? Major ouchies.
Posted By: Guest#9634 (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 12:47 PM
Hogan's impact is more. And the WWF should know this because TNA is beating them at their own game. And that game is marketing and promotion. While TNA has been doing everything short of dropping flyers from the sky in Hiroshima to promote the January 4th show, the WWF has done absolutely NOTHING to answer, other than maention Bret Hart twice in a few hallway conversations. And they never tied him to ANY date! And don't say "because it's on TV it's official" 1) it's not, they teased Bret coming on TV for 10 YEARS only bringing out midgets, imposters, or no one and 2) regular fans aren't aware of that.
So where does that leave us? IF and that's a big IF they deciede to pull the trigger and announce it, their only chance is the Dec. 28 Raw, which is historically one of the lowest watched ones since it's in the middle of Christmas and New Years.
Bottom Line is the WWF is in a bad position. They have one week to officially promote it, when a lot of people are off and not in their normal TV routine.
Also as un unrelated topic, but an interesting fact, Bret Hart was always on the losing end of the monday night wars. When he was with the WWF, WCW was kicking ass in 96-97, and when he went to WCW, WWF turned the tide in their favor shortly in 98. So just keep that in mind as well.
Posted By: Michael (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 01:13 PM
I don't understand why anyone cares if WWE stars are on the juice. Why should Congress get involved with it at all? It's not a real sport - there's no gambling to protect! It's entertainment - if someone wants to roid up to be a bigger monster, let them! Nobody cries about the children when some chick gets a boob job to be more appealing on TV.
Posted By: Rod Oracheski (Registered) on December 24, 2009 at 01:40 AM
Your missing the big picture here, and the most important factor. You compared getting a boob job to doing steroids, and while I will agree that, like roids, Boob jobs can send kids an unwanted message (the whole "bigger is better", and small chests are bad). The fact is, like it or not, boob jobs are completely and %100 LEGAL in the United States. Taking anabolic steroids or HGH without a doctors prescription for a legitimate medical reason (like heeling your body after surgry or injury) is ILLEGAL!
While I may personally feel that Congress has more important things they could be attending too than if some ballplayer or wrestler abuses/takes steriods, I don't get upset about it cause it is an illegal substance, unless used appropriately.
Also, let's not forget Benoit, whatever his reasons or whatever caused him to snap, I've personaly known roid users and it does effect personality and lead to roid rage.
Posted By: Pat (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 01:29 PM
Is Bert Hart appearing on Raw a one-shot deal?
Posted By: dogpound7382 (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 02:00 PM
Bert Hart vs. Kobe Johnston
Book it.
Posted By: Guest#6542 (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 02:06 PM
"Sorry Shawn, but how can anyone take any of your opinions seriously when you claim smoking pot and drinking aren't a big deal and don't really matter? Are you serious? That's honestly one of the most laughable things I've ever heard. - Posted By: SummerDogg7 (Guest)"
I had some nice red bull and vodkas last night at a Christmas party.
Posted By: Shawn S Lealos (Registered) on December 24, 2009 at 02:09 PM
"Me, I like the match. Probably because I understand it. - Posted By: Nate (Guest)"
That's because your a dumbass. Damn, that was easy. Now, I'm as cool as you
Posted By: Shawn S Lealos (Registered) on December 24, 2009 at 02:11 PM
Hart wasn't a draw as champion in the U.S. during his reign, but he was one of the company's biggest international draws up until recently. Wonder why WWE toured a lot more internationally with Hart than they did with Hogan? Because Hart was as big a draw, if not more, as Hogan in foreign markets. That Summerslam match against Bulldog was sold as much on Bret's rep as it was on Bulldog being the big hero in his home country. It's also why there was a downturn in foreign tours after Hart left. Austin was a huge domestic draw for the company, but Hart was again a bigger star outside the states.
Posted By: Guest#1499 (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 02:16 PM
Vince McMahon - "I do not see TNA as a threat, I do not even acknowledge them. Oh, coincidently, on the same night they have Hogan, we're bringing in Bret Hart".
Posted By: Vince McWoman (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 02:28 PM
Never under estimate El dandy
Posted By: BH (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 02:33 PM
Bret Hart's appearance will stop any significant ratings boost that Hulk's appearance might have done! Hulk's debut in TNA will boost the ratings a little but not nearly as much as it may have now that Bret returns to WWE. Oh and BERT Hart used to tag with Randy Hogan in NWA years ago! (JOKE) Only fans over 30 will know who Randy Hogan is. And not many of them will probably remember. He was a jobber on NWA in the 80's who looked kind of like Hulk but smaller. Anyone know who Randy Hogan is?
Posted By: Basil (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 03:00 PM
BERT vs. hogen... 5 star backrake match of doom!!!
Posted By: Bert Hart (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 03:19 PM
Bret isn't enough to make me watch RAW. RAW sucks so much ass I don't think I'll watch it at all in 2010 unless someone seriously recommended an episode.
Posted By: puffykilled2pac (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 03:49 AM
This I love Bret but I don't see why people keep backing the WWE it has sucked ass for years.
Atlest TNA had 2 great matches on each of there last 2 ppvs
Posted By: random (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 03:30 PM
bret is a star. He is the reason why they tour internationally. But I do hate tna and rather have a swerve where bret goes to tna like luger went to nitro. wwe dosen't deserve bret. Also tna would get ratings if bret did show up with hulk guranteed.
Posted By: Hartfan (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 04:29 PM
@ Michael
Bullshit bret was always at the losing end. the end of 95 to 96 when bret left after wreslemania the was tied with nitro matter of fact they beat nitro more then nitro beat them but the were more up and up untill shawn became champion that's why the wanted bret back. If it was anyone that never felt victory as champion during the monday night wars was hb gay I mean shawn michaels. Do your research buddy also once bret retired nitro was getting it's lowest mark which is the same marks that raw is getting now. Hell when bret was wrestling raw and nitro had good ratings not the ratings that raw have now. So dont shit on bret one of the best there ever lived. Hell he is the best wrestler to me next to savage and flair.
Posted By: bret (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 04:36 PM
think people overrate bret hart. if memory serves me right, the wwe was doing pretty bad with bret as champion. in no way is he a bigger draw than The Hulkster. Bret just isnt enough to cover up the fact that the wwe is stale as hell!!
Posted By: rick goodwin (Guest)
Ya, Hogans tour of Australia is doing great sin't it? Almost half filled bingo halls. Moron.
Posted By: Guest#4564 (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 06:05 AM
the tour is over and by all accounts went well. has bret sold 93,000 no. has bret set and broken records? no. thank you very much!!
Posted By: rick goodwin (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 04:36 PM
bet you bret will give the wwe a 4.o or my name isn't double jj.
Posted By: double jj (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 04:39 PM
Bret returns > Hulk Returns....AGAIN. Simple logic...been there done that vs what we never thought we would see.
Posted By: The Coach (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 05:04 PM
Oh god, these Bert Hart comments fucking slayed me, my ribs hurt now.
Posted By: Foolio (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 05:30 PM
Ok, BUT...who would win in a match between Bert Hart and Bret Clark?
Posted By: Than Guy (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 05:54 PM
I can't breathe...lol
Bert Hart Vs. Ho-gen...lol
Bert, is over big...lol....
Sincerely, to all the marks, smarks, Kizz-arnies, and oh ok, ring-rats..
A Merry Christmas to ALL....Bert ..lol
Bert, the best hair every was, the hair there ever is, the best hair every will be..lol...lol............lol...lol...
Posted By: HisPrinceMichael (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 06:25 PM
1) Fact: Overall it was a good PPV. Starting match was good, F & F was good, both Main Events delivered...Nice effort by both companies in the month of Dec.
2) Fiction: Vince is doing this, because of Linda running for office and we all know it. If Orton is doing the cronic or other drugs on a continual basis, will he be "fired"??? I don't think so.
3) Fact: He was a talent that was not very utilized....Strong mic skills, above average wrestler, could have generated some major heat and could have been a real rival for Red.
4) Fiction: Fun match, sets up future storylines and cleans house at the same time.
5) Fiction: There is no faction on this. The only reason in my mind that he is getting his 2nd chance is he is an HBK boy. As for a benefit to SD, how??? Midcard bust like McIntyre or low carder like Knox. That doesn't help WWE or SD.
6) FACT x 1000: Shawn and Mike are right on with this one.
7) Fiction: Another good wrestler shafted by the Vince machine. I would have used him as a GM on one of the shows. RIP: ECW.
8) Fiction: Here is why. Brett is NOT wrestling anymore (I think the stoke and concussions may have something to do with it). Hogan can still wrestle (just not very well) and so you as a promoter can do more with that. Plus, wrestling fans know what it is leading to...the Montreal screw-job storyline (major yawn), which can we for argument sake, has been beaten to death already for like the last ump-teen years. With Hogan we don't know what we are getting, is it N.W.O. Version 2.0, something new and different? We don't know and that makes it exciting for a wrestling fan.
Posted By: Mr. KT (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 07:20 PM
It's amazing how some of you hype Hogan as a big deal. TNA will maybe rate about a 1.5 if they're REALLY lucky. WWE will likely come around 4.0... People like my kid brother who was a fan of the Hitman (he hasn't watched wrestling since Montreal) will be wanting to watch.
Posted By: Doc (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 07:54 PM
Bret is all messed up like good old JR
Posted By: oklahomo (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 08:21 PM
haha Shawn and Michael that tickles my insides
Posted By: Guest#5126 (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 09:56 PM
Will Bert Hart be bringing bret the hitman clark?
Posted By: nWoMikey (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 10:39 PM
So long RVD one shot deal. 411 has a new joke in town.
Posted By: Sean Michel (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 10:52 PM
Bullshit bret was always at the losing end. the end of 95 to 96 when bret left after wreslemania the was tied with nitro matter of fact they beat nitro more then nitro beat them but the were more up and up untill shawn became champion that's why the wanted bret back. If it was anyone that never felt victory as champion during the monday night wars was hb gay I mean shawn michaels. Do your research buddy also once bret retired nitro was getting it's lowest mark which is the same marks that raw is getting now. Hell when bret was wrestling raw and nitro had good ratings not the ratings that raw have now. So dont shit on bret one of the best there ever lived. Hell he is the best wrestler to me next to savage and flair.
Posted By: bret (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 04:36 PM
Ummm, that was not the point of my post, but more of a side comment. But since you harped on it, i will put you in your place with data and not the assumptions like you did.
Bret with WWF mid 80s - Nov. 1997
Nitro wins first ratings war: 1996 (yes, Bret did take a few months off, but not 84 weeks, dumbass!)
March/April 98, Raw wins ratings, WCW only wins 2 more times for the rest of it's run. Once when the horsemen reunite, and again when Goldberg won the title and that was it!
So, minus the time when nitro started and barely anyone watched (pre-NWO) and that 3-4 month strech at the start of 98, and plus those two weeks in the middle of 98 (which Bret had NOTHING to do with), yes the hitman was on the winning end of the ratings war. But for his WWF run as a heel, and his other two and a half years and WCW, he was getting killed in the ratings.
The funny thing is, I'm a hitman fan! But I don't let my emotions get the best of me, I let the data do the talking, and Bret just didn't pull in the ratings, I'm sorry to tell you that.
Posted By: Michael (Guest) on December 24, 2009 at 11:26 PM
Bret = 4.0+ rating for the 'E
Hogan = 1.3 rating for TNA
Therefore Bret > Hogan
Posted By: Truth Table (Guest) on December 25, 2009 at 12:52 AM
I like the "Who is Bret Hart?" Questions and comments on here...Every wrestling fan should know who Bret is...(Should be a common house hold name - Andre, Flair, Warrior, etc, etc)
Every youngester should look up these names before even watching the half talent on TV now...
Bret Hart "The best there is, the best there was, the BEST that'll ever will be."
Posted By: cel (Guest) on December 25, 2009 at 01:24 AM
I don' think Bret Hart can pull off the non-wrestler portrayal as many people think. I mean he didn't do that good in WCW when he wasn't wrestling and yeah that can be booking's fault, but when you have the technical wrestler like Bret people want to see him wrestle. Hogan can pull off that non-wrestler portrayal because well lets face it... he really isn't that good in the ring anymore but the man can draw heat or cheers, there is no doubt about that. Although I would love to see both shows on the 4th live. I'm going to choose iMPACT! because they have the better talent and the better draw.
Posted By: Guest#1317 (Guest) on December 25, 2009 at 03:16 AM
"BERT HART DOESN'T NEED THE WWE!!!"
We at 411 wish Michael Bauer well in his future endeavors. ;)
Posted By: Hart Fan (Guest) on December 25, 2009 at 07:24 AM
Taz sucks. I was so happy when he left WWE and didn't mind him going to TNA...until he became a commentator. That's the only thing I hate about TNA. And, I was gonna watch TNA on the 4th to try and help them out, unless either Bret Hart or Randy Savage was hosting, so I'm gonna have to go with WWE.
Posted By: Don West > Taz (Guest) on December 26, 2009 at 10:00 PM
In pro baseball, do I care if a steroid user holds the Home Run record? Absolutely not
Bauer, this has to be one of the most ideotic statements I have ever read. Who cares if records are held by people who cheat? What a dick
Posted By: Nicole (Guest) on December 27, 2009 at 11:47 AM
"Michael Bauer: FACT. Yeah, I'm saying this because of the pure difference between Hulk Hogan appearing on TNA and Bret Hart appearing in the WWE. Hulk Hogan on TNA might seem incredibly surreal, but we have seen plenty of Hogan promos and press conferences on TNA programming already, so the shock value isn't there anymore. However, Bret Hart showing on January 4th, or any show, even if announced a week in advance, will be so insane because there isn't one WWE fan who ever, EVER, though they would see Bret Hart in a WWE ring again. So tuning into Raw for that week, also being the first week without Monday Night Football in 16 weeks, would be more than easy and the motivation is right there for them. Now while seeing Hogan in an TNA ring is out of this world also, keep in mind that we are talking about a guy who has whored out his entire family, leading to his divorce, his insanity, and his need to do something to get an income. He needs to be in TNA when the WWE doesn't have a reason to bring him in. BERT HART DOESN'T NEED THE WWE!!! And that is the biggest difference between the two appearances and why I am much more excited to see if Bret Hart comes back to the WWE. Just please don't have him wrestle a match with his condition."
Michael, are you on fucking crack or something???
Posted By: DoubleADaGreat (Guest) on December 31, 2009 at 11:22 AM
Copyright � 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.