www.411mania.com
|  News |  Columns |  TV Reports |  Video Reviews |  Title History |  Hall of Fame |  News Report |  The Dunn List |
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// Irina Shayk Shows Off Her Killer Curves At Cannes
MUSIC
// Kanye West and Jay-Z's Watch the Throne 2 Confirmed
WRESTLING
// Brooke Hogan Says Hulk Didn't Know She Was in Talks With TNA
POLITICS
// Obama Leads In Florida, Ohio, & VIrginia
MMA
// 411's MMA Roundtable - UFC 146: Dos Santos vs. Mir
GAMES
// Castlevania: Lords of Shadow Sequel Teased


 HOT TOPICS
//  CM Punk
//  John Cena
//  Triple H
//  Hulk Hogan
//  Randy Orton
//  Christian
SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds





Follow 411mania on Twitter!




Add 411 On Facebook
 



 
 411mania » Wrestling » Columns



Advertisement
The Triple Threat 03.14.10: The 180th Edition - Money in the bank, TNA, Stone Cold, More
Posted by David Martell on 03.14.2010



Photobucket

Topic # 1 RVD debuted in TNA this past week. How do you feel about this?

David Martell: This was definitely no surprise since the internet basically told everyone he was going to TNA. RVD's debut in TNA just makes me realize how stupid TNA really is. RVD squashing Sting in his first match was incredibly stupid. First off, this is a big money match, why waste it on free TV. Second, why have ANYONE squash Sting like that. It has been a long time since Sting has been in a TNA ring and they just waste it. The entire segment was just a waste of time and a waste of money for TNA. If TNA ever wants to become credible, they need to learn how to book a debut at least. If RVD came in wrestled a fifteen minute match with Sting, although it would be on free TV, it would have been a much better debut and it would of made both men look a lot stronger. Yes, making RVD squash Sting does make RVD look extremely strong but then again he got murdered with a bat after the match. With all that said, I am glad to see RVD back in the ring, I just hope he can produce some good matches in TNA.

Jacob San Antonio: I'll start by saying good for him. It doesn't do him any good to stay off of TV, and hopefully TNA will get a really good run going for him. Alright, with that out of the way, I'd like to ask TNA what the crap kind of debut was that? "Hey everybody, it's RVD! We're giving you what you really want!" One squash match later, and RVD gets beaten around for who knows how long. As many have pointed out before, I have a tendency to not see the big picture. Yet I seriously can't wrap my head around why TNA would bother setting RVD's return like that. Okay, he's awesome enough to squash Sting in less than a minute. However, he's not awesome enough to avoid a beat down after that first initial minute. Hey, let's have Hogan rescue him while we're at it! I'm sure TNA has something better planned for the guy, I'd just rather they didn't stumble around with bizarre moments like this one. Good luck out there RVD.

Zach Brown: It makes sense for RVD to be in TNA. I've actually been expecting it for a while now, and I'm surprised that it took this long to sign Mr. Monday Night. Why he went over Sting in like 20 seconds is kind of puzzling to me. It was exciting in the moment to see RVD suddenly enter the Impact Zone and attack Sting, but pinning him was just silly and came off weird. RVD can add a lot to TNA. In my opinion, he is one of the few ex-WWE guys besides Kurt Angle that can actually add to the quality of the show. Rob Van Dam is exciting to watch in the ring. Towards the end of his WWE run, he was kind of phoning it in. But hopefully, being in TNA and it's competitive nature will make RVD want to try once more. I'm interested to see what TNA will do with him.

Topic # 2 TNA Impact only got a 1.0 rating this week going head to head with RAW. Do you think this is a bad sign for the company?

David Martell: This has to be a pretty bid disappointment for TNA. They have the debut of RVD, the return of Sting, and Hogan and Flair in a wrestling match. With all that, they were only able to pull in a 1.0 rating. Unfortunately, I think the mystique of TNA being an alternative of the WWE has passed. This last episode of Impact just shows you how TNA isn't really ready to go head to head with the WWE. They don't even know how to book a debut right. TNA first needs to get their product together where it is something worth watching. The problem is that they are bloating up their roster with old guys and forgetting about the young ones. When the Nasty Boys are getting tag title shots then there has to be something wrong. I just don't want TNA to have the same fate as WCW but right now it is looking like that more and more every week.

Jacob San Antonio: I was expecting a lower rating than the week prior, I'll admit, but I didn't expect TNA to barely reach a 1. My guess is people were seriously not looking forward to Hogan/Flair, but that doesn't really explain the ratings for the entire show. When TNA can't snag some ratings from a WWE hosted by Criss Angel, I'm seriously worried about how they're going to rebound. With Stone Cold hosting tomorrow's RAW, that's probably going to hurt TNA's ratings for this week as well. It might just be an adjustment phase as TNA gets settled into Monday nights, but it seriously couldn't hurt for TNA to pull out all the stops in their next couple of weeks. The appearances of Sting, RVD, and Jeff Hardy shows me they understand this, so I guess things might pick up as the months go on.

Zach Brown: Upon hearing this news, my first instinct was to just point and laugh at TNA. But that's a little insensitive of me. Maybe TNA just wasn't ready for the big time yet. I have to say, Raw was pretty mediocre. All WWE is doing right now is waiting around till Wrestlemania. The feuds are set now, and there's really nothing new or exciting. And Criss Angel is not going to put butts in the seats. So in terms of show quality, there is no discernable reason as to why WWE is doing so well in the ratings. TNA did feel like they were giving their all. A lot of the character interactions and promos were good, RVD debuted, it felt like anything could happen, and the Triple Threat for the X Division Title was a good match. Even though I didn't care for the other matches, those positives should have made TNA more competitive with WWE. But for some reason, it just didn't. Maybe TNA just doesn't have enough brand awareness? Both Raw and iMPACT are guilty of not having enough actual wrestling on their shows, and yet Raw is consistently in the 3s and 4s for ratings. I'm not totally sure about what TNA can change to make things more competitive. I guess they just need a lot of positive word of mouth about their match quality. If people keep talking about amazing matches they saw on iMPACT, that could definitely help things out for TNA. But that's all that I can come up with. Unfortunately for TNA this past week, the Monday Night Wars have not returned. At least not yet.

Topic # 3 Sting made his return to TNA this past week. Your thoughts?

David Martell: It is always good to see Sting on TV but they made him look like crap on Monday Night. Losing to RVD in what seemed like less than a minute was overly ridiculous. Sting is a legend. You don't see the WWE jobbing out the Undertaker in less than a minute. It is fine if Sting loses matches to credible people but do it in a credible way. I am still surprised that Sting is still in TNA. I figured by now he would swallow his pride and head over to greener pastures in the WWE where he might actually get treated as a legend. Wrestle for the WWE for a year, retire, and live a long happy life. Seems like something Sting would want but instead he decided to continue rotting in TNA. I don't mind Sting being a heel because that is actually pretty cool but I hope they redeem him somehow to make him look better.

Jacob San Antonio: I think a better topic to consider is "Can Sting succeed as a heel?" Impact managed to shock me three times in a small timeframe as Sting's comeback, Sting's heel turn, followed by the RVD squash match blew my mind. I didn't expect to see Sting in any sort of capacity, but a heel Sting just makes the idea even more ludicrous to me. TNA tried to push the issue with his backstage segments, his allying with Flair and Styles, and his beating of RVD after a quick squash match, but I'm having a hard time buying it. I've never really considered Sting to be a decent heel, and while he could seriously take this angle places I don't expect much to come from it. Still, the line has been drawn in the sand between Flair and Hogan, and maybe we might see some more last minute allegiances in this growing feud.

Zach Brown: So what was with all this talk of retirement these past few years? Sting just seems to be constantly in TNA over and over again. Not that I have a problem with Sting. It's just that he keeps going on hiatus and coming back and then leaving again. It's getting old. I wish he'd just stay on the active roster. That being said, I am of course glad to see Sting back. He is one of TNA's greatest assets because he is one of the few people that Vince can never have. And he's one of the best workers that TNA has. He took an awful storyline with Abyss and made almost all of the matches entertaining. Except for that casket match at Destination X. Damn that match was bad. Like I said earlier, RVD going over Sting was random and confusing. But it should lead to a solid feud, and it establishes RVD as a main event threat instead of an X Division guy. Sting as a heel is not something I'm totally behind because the face paint has never given me a strong heel vibe. But all in all, I'm glad that Sting is back, and I can't wait to see what kind of matches he can put on.

Topic # 4 How do you feel about the MITB ladder match having more than eight participants this year?

David Martell: How do you make the MITB ladder match more of a spot fest? Add more wrestlers! I hope this isn't a big mistake on the WWE's part. I am wondering if they can still produce a good MITB ladder match with that many competitors. I get that this is an easy way to have all their major talent being featured at Wrestlemania but man this is going to be a clusterfuck. Wrestlemania is really shaping up and even with ten people in the MITB ladder match, it should be very interesting to watch. I just hope that we see Shelton power bombing MVP out of the ring one more time. That was brutal.

Jacob San Antonio: I've said time and time again how much I like chaotic matches, and I can't see how having more participants in the MitB hurts it at all. It might be a tad too frantic for the cameras to catch all the action, but that's one of the appeals of the match itself: it's one of the few matches I can think of in wrestling where seeing it in person gives you the vantage point the TV viewers can't see. I remember seeing the MitB match at Wrestlemania 25 and then watching the same match later on DVD: you saw a lot of the important stuff on DVD, but you missed a lot of the crazy stuff going on at ringside and at various spots throughout the arena. This year's MitB has some solid participants, and I can't think of a reason to exclude any of them from the match. It's gearing up to be yet another solid match at Wrestlemania.

Zach Brown: There definitely are a lot of contestants in Money in the Bank this year. But Money in the Bank is a great chaotic match, and whether it's 8 or 9 people, it's not going to be too terribly noticeable that you have that extra person in there. As for why they have nine people this year, that concept is really beyond me. Sure, a lot of these guys need a spot at Wrestlemania, but this should not be the match they should be in for a few of them. I really don't think that Kane, Drew McIntyre, or Matt Hardy should be in this match at all. Everyone else in the match is either a great choice for this kind of match, or deserving of a main event push. Kane is terrible and adds nothing to the match. Drew McIntyre has the IC title, and shouldn't even be in this match. He doesn't add anything interesting, period. And they simply didn't have anything for Matt Hardy, so they stuck him in this match. The cap was raised to 9 to include these three guys? How about John Morrison, Kofi Kingston, and R-Truth? Aren't those significantly better choices for a unpredictable multi man ladder match!? Sure Morrison and Truth are in a Tag match, but that match should have gone to The Hart Dynasty or Cryme Time, not a randomly thrown together team. All in all, raising the participants to 9 doesn't bother me. It's when they raise it to 9 and three people don't even belong...that's when it's just dumb.

Topic # 5 Would you like Stone Cold Steve Austin to be a part of the Bret Hart/Vince McMahon storyline at Wrestlemania?

David Martell: I would love to see Stone Cold be a part of another Wrestlemania. I thought it was ironic that they showed the Goldberg vs. Lesnar match on the Wrestlemania rewind since Stone Cold actually was the ref of that bout. I can see him playing the same type of role here as well. Steve Austin has a great deal of past with both of these guys and it would be interesting to see what side he would choose although him being against Vince is the obvious choice. WWE is really trying to stack the card this year into what seems like a super card and having Stone Cold on the card in any fashion just added to the excitement. This will be a Wrestlemania for old and new fans and by making the card into something that is truly grand it will bring in more viewers and overall I think this would be an excellent way to bring back the old fans to the WWE.

Jacob San Antonio: I'm actually split on this issue. On the one hand, the Attitude Era in me says that you can never have too much Stone Cold. On the other, I find the Bret Hart/Vince feud to be a bit too much of a personal matter at this point to allow outside interference. This completely contradicts my predictions from weeks ago where I expect the two of them to be at Cena's/Batista's respective ringsides, but as the feud has developed I've come to terms with what looks to be one last match from Bret Hart. I'm surprised to see this, since I didn't think he was in any shape to go through with a match, but if it's going to happen I want it strictly between Hart and Vince. No interference. This feud has been waiting to escalate into a fight for the past 13 years, and I think it would be best to just let these two have at each other. On a side note, I'm a bit concerned for Hart's safety, and not just due to his health. Is Vince really the best guy to trust with this? He's never been a good wrestler, and even though he's willing to do some downright insane spots to get the fans going, I'm not sure if he can carry the match if something happens to Hart. I suppose we'll see.

Zach Brown: Meh. I could care less if Stone Cold was at Wrestlemania or not. I saw him last year at Wrestlemania and that was definitely special. And it was special because it felt like Stone Cold's last appearance for WWE. Now he is hosting Raw, and it's clear that Stone Cold will have a relationship with WWE for several years to come. If Stone Cold gets involved in the Vince vs. Bret feud, it would obviously be as a guest referee. And that's something that Stone Cold is no stranger to doing. If Stone Cold feels inclined to get involved in the story at Wrestlemania, so be it. I won't be offended. Stone Cold could make a thousand more appearances in WWE, and it wouldn't bother me in the slightest for obvious reasons. I just hope Austin realizes that the storyline is piss poor.


Photobucket

Photobucket

Our thoughts on CM Punk.

David Martell: CM Punk is wrestling gold. If you haven't seen his promo this past week on Smackdown, find it on youtube and watch it. It is by far one of the best promos I have seen in a long time. CM Punk continues to evolve himself into a super heel. He is definitely the one to watch in the WWE right now. WWE is very lucky to have gotten Punk in the first place and thank god they let him run with his own gimmick. He is one of the best talkers in the business today and he is also a pretty damn good wrestler when he wants to be or when he is given the chance to shine. His match at Wrestlemania with Rey should be one of the best matches of the night if given time. It will definitely be a sleeper hit if nothing else. It is only a matter of time before Punk is a World Champion again and I personally can't wait.

Jacob San Antonio: Man, CM Punk has had a neat time in the WWE. He's managed to play baby face for so long that simply turning heel has been enough for some fans to lose it whenever he's on TV. CM Punk has always been a pretty talented guy, cutting some nice promos and being a solid wrestler overall. He's been given plenty of opportunities to stand out, and thanks to this he's part of one my favorite moments in the WWE, with his last laugh as Crazy Mariachi Punk against Chavo Guerrero. His first MitB win in Wrestlemania XXIV came as a complete surprise, and his cash in on Edge led to a title reign brought down by an abundance of JBL and the lack of personality Punk's face character really had. His run as tag champs with Kofi Kingston wasn't too terribly exciting either. It wasn't until CM Punk's second MitB win that the gears started turning and Punk got another shot at being a serious champion. I don't think I need to remind everyone of his feud with Jeff Hardy, one of the highlights of the summer of '09 and by far one of the best feuds of that year. Since his heel turn Punk has revitalized his character and found himself a nice second wind in the WWE, getting some awesome heat with each promo and putting on some fantastic matches in and out of PPVs. CM Punk's had a pretty awesome career in the WWE, and he's still got a lot of years ahead of him. I can't wait to see where he goes from here.

Zach Brown: Lately, I am hot and cold on CM Punk. I am a big fan of Punk's wrestling, his promo ability, his character, and his storylines. He is the total package in my eyes. But I am not a fan of the way he is being used right now. He has a solid stable, and I love that at both The Royal Rumble and Elimination Chamber, he got chances to spout off on the straight edge lifestyle. They were great opportunities to give CM Punk some much needed spotlight. But none of it has been going anywhere. At Royal Rumble, he was set to have a Royal Rumble match as epic as Stone Cold did back when he was eliminating everyone and constantly checking his "watch."And then he was eliminated way too soon. The Straight Edge Society needs some gold for me to take them seriously. Whether it's the tag titles or one of the big belts, something needs to happen. They need to capitalize on Punk's savior gimmick, plain and simple. WWE just needs to give him the ball again, and we will have another epic few months of wrestling. So yeah, I am a big fan of CM Punk.


Thats all for this week. Feel free to comment at the bottom of the page and have a great week in wrestling. CYA!


Post Comment (19)  |  Email David Martell  |  View David Martell's 411 Profile

  Send To Friend  |    Stumble It!  |    Digg It!  | 



Please add your comment below.
If you are registered, you can login and post under your registered name. If not, you can post as a guest or register.

* Please note that 411 moderates all comments. Your comment will show up on the site after it has been approved by an editor.
 
Name : 
Comment : 
Remaining Characters : 
2800
 

Comments (19)

 
I think you need to be more patient with CM Punk, Zach. He has put himself into such a position where he could become World champ at any time, regardless of wins or losses...very similar to Jericho's position in the company. Punk can go on autopilot with this gimmick for at least another 4 months without getting involved in any signficant main event ot title match and still be very relevant.

Posted By: DeeRayMoore (Guest)  on March 14, 2010 at 01:48 PM

 
 
Punk will have the big gold belt again soon enough. Once the Jericho/Edge fued ends it seems pretty logical to run a CM Punk vs Edge program for the title. The 'Rated R' vs 'Straight Edge' stuff almost writes itself.

Posted By: Guest#4588 (Guest)  on March 14, 2010 at 02:01 PM

 
 
It's funny seeing everyone slate Impact for drawing a 1.0 rating, as if that is some huge epic failure. The fact is, they got the same rating as they do on thursday, meaning they kept their audience going against RAW. Now they have a platform from which to attempt to grow and take some of WWE's viewers. They haven't made any victories yet, but this isn't a defeat either.

Posted By: Guest#0377 (Guest)  on March 14, 2010 at 02:04 PM

 
 
Sting just had shoulder surgery and wasn't up for a real match, so they had RVD "surprise" him, coming out of the crowd and hitting a top rope kick from behind and getting a shocking pin. Sting then attacked him from behind while he was celebrating with a freaking baseball bat. To act like it buried either guy is ridiculous. It didn't make Sting look weak, it was a surprise attack and a fluke pin. It didn't make RVD look weak, he got a big win and then was assaulted with a weapon after the match. Its not like Sting just punched him into unconsciousness or something. I'm looking forward to the rematch when things are straight up.

Posted By: No (Guest)  on March 14, 2010 at 02:37 PM

 
 
It's funny seeing everyone slate Impact for drawing a 1.0 rating, as if that is some huge epic failure. The fact is, they got the same rating as they do on thursday, meaning they kept their audience going against RAW. Now they have a platform from which to attempt to grow and take some of WWE's viewers. They haven't made any victories yet, but this isn't a defeat either.

Posted By: Guest#0377 (Guest) on March 14, 2010 at 02:04 PM

It's a commendable point that they retained their audience against raw, but considering they heavily hyped this show to the moon, and they had the debuts of two hot established stars, the return of a popular legend, and the return of two icons to the wrestling ring and still barely made the rating (against a raw with the weakest guest host in a while) thats something to really be worried about.


Posted By: gooched (Guest)  on March 14, 2010 at 02:37 PM

 
 
It's funny seeing everyone slate Impact for drawing a 1.0 rating, as if that is some huge epic failure. The fact is, they got the same rating as they do on thursday, meaning they kept their audience going against RAW. Now they have a platform from which to attempt to grow and take some of WWE's viewers. They haven't made any victories yet, but this isn't a defeat either.

Posted By: Guest#0377 (Guest) on March 14, 2010 at 02:04 PM

Keep telling that to yourself buddy. Fact of the matter, FACT of the matter, F-A-C-T of the matter is TNA got their asses kicked in with their entire show stacked huge.


Posted By: James Bond (Guest)  on March 14, 2010 at 02:42 PM

 
 
For MITB, as a viewer, anytime you have more than six guys in the ring it all just becomes a slurry of dudes. I'd be surprised if WWE didn't mention they were adding more guys and people noticed.

Stone Cold as part of the feud is probably the best use they've had of him in the last six years. He obviously has the history with Vince, but he also had a huge feud with Bret(WM13 anyone?). At least it makes sense and Stone Cold will put in his A game, I believe, out of respect for Bret if nothing else.

Punk is the man. I'm glad they've gotten away from him droning on and on about pills, cough syrup and drinking and referred to the Straight Edge lifestyle in a more general way. He's a great "lighter side" heel; he's not going on about hating some guy or going to maim him. To me, he's like Mr. Perfect, Kurt Angle and (seriously) Brother Love all in one. He can be serious, be funny and get it done in the ring. And, if he gets a long-term injury, he could totally contribute in a manager position. Punk is God. Hell, that would be a great angle for him, "I'm better than God!"


Posted By: ThePants (Guest)  on March 14, 2010 at 03:01 PM

 
 
this seemingly never ending attempt to use TNA's rating as yet another stick to beat them with is getting a bit stale now.

they NEVER EXPECTED to beat Raw. I'd even wager they never expected to even get close.

The fact that they took their core audience with them to Monday night should rightly be seen as a success.

I'd imagine that most of the so called "reporters" on the various dirt sites are focusing a hell of a lot more on the ratings than anyone associated with TNA


Posted By: Hank (Guest)  on March 14, 2010 at 03:31 PM

 
 
U people are looking at the final numbers and not looking at the quarter hour breakdowns. If u look at the numbers, no one really changed channels from one show to the other besides in the final quarter hour. You can nitpick the booking of impact all you want, but the fact is none of their booking flubs made a huge difference in the ratings besides in the last 15 minutes. If you want MY personal opinion, check your dvrs and refer to the quarter hour breakdown. The major dropoff happened in the final 15 minutes. The brains at Spike tv ran a Game Trailers break that included hype and interviews for Final Fantasy that lasted what felt like an eternity. THIS would mark the exact moment that I personally switched over to see what was going on on Raw. I switched back to impact, but I would imagine that others didn't. In fact the Raw rating went up significantly during this quarter hour while Impact's rating dropped significantly indicating that this indeed happened. Call my theory far fetched, but go back and watch the last 25 minutes of Impact including commercials and tell me that final break wasn't lengthy enough for you to see what else was on. It's as if the people at Spike were inviting you to change the channel.

Impact scored a rating close to what they normally score on thursdays. While they shouldn't get comfortable, I definitely don't think the rating marks the end of tna.


Posted By: bighustle (Guest)  on March 14, 2010 at 03:40 PM

 
 
"When the Nasty Boys are getting tag title shots then there has to be something wrong"

Why? The nasty boys having been kicking ass lately, and are more over than any other tag team right now. Of course they deserve not only title shots, but the title.

"My guess is people were seriously not looking forward to Hogan/Flair"

Are you serious? this was the best part of impact by far.

" I'm not totally sure about what TNA can change to make things more competitive."

Simple listen to the fans. Take the title off that nobody AJ Styles, and put it on Hogan. Am I the only one hearing the fans beg for it?
Until they do they probably will not do much better than 1.0.
You have the biggest star in the history of wrestling in your organization, yet you have a undersized nobody as the champion?
It just doesnt make sense. Plus Hogan was solid in the ring, considering he hasnt wrestled in awhile. Sting should be chasing Hogan for the title throughout the spring.


Posted By: Vic Tomato (Guest)  on March 14, 2010 at 03:59 PM

 
 
I have no friggin clue what they're thinking turning Sting heel. To me its not a question of "can sting work as a heel?" That's irrelevant. The question for me is "why turn sting heel now?" Yes he's an antagonist for hogan, but does hogan need anymore antagonists right now??? Hogan is about as babyface as ur gonna get right now and they've done everything to keep him that way including a double swerve. Hogan has Flair, the Band, AJ Styles and potentially Eric Bischoff to play hero against. I don't see the logic of Sting's motivation against Hogan at this point. What does he have on Hogan the on screen character. This is only going to degenerate into some worked shoot angle that will go over fans heads simply because Hogan's on screen character has done EVERYTHING to keep himself on the good guy's side

Posted By: bighustle (Guest)  on March 14, 2010 at 04:01 PM

 
 
Punk is the best damn thing going on in the WWE today.,cuts great promos,has constantly killer matches with quality workers.,I feel like he could get hot like Edge did back in late '05 early '06.

Posted By: Me (Guest)  on March 14, 2010 at 04:36 PM

 
 
Lets see how TNA does tomorrow on a taped episode going against a live raw with STONE COLD as the host.

Posted By: dogpound7382 (Guest)  on March 14, 2010 at 04:37 PM

 
 
"Meh. I could care less if Stone Cold was at Wrestlemania or not."

It's "I COULDN'T care less!" When will people get this through their thick skulls? You're trying to say you don't care, but by messing up the phrase, you are actually saying that you DO care, at least a little bit, if not more than a little.


Posted By: Fun with cliches (Guest)  on March 14, 2010 at 05:09 PM

 
 
The Anti-TNA crap is getting annoying. That was a damn good show. RVD squashes Sting then gets a beat down with a weapon and you call it a wasted debut. Chris Jericho debuted in WWE and got degraded by The Rock which left Jericho's lip quivering like a little bitch. Thats referred to as one of the best debuts ever. I'll never understand peoples logic. WWE can get 5 stars for doing something while TNA gets torn apart for doing the same thing. Just because it's a war doesn't mean you all have to pick the same side of the battle lines.

Posted By: Burnout (Guest)  on March 14, 2010 at 08:11 PM

 
 
Here's how you make Money in the Bank work with a ton of people: allow people to be eliminated. Making it possible to eliminate people by pin fall or submission would add another interesting element to the match. I know it sounds similar to King of the Mountain, but the chance to get rid of participants would justify the crazy spots and help thin the field to focus on the winner as the match came to an end. Eliminations would also make it possible to have more than one person get over in the match.
Thoughts?


Posted By: Genius (Guest)  on March 14, 2010 at 08:36 PM

 
 
I can think of one and only one scenario in which adding more participants to the Wrestlemania Money in the Bank Ladder Match makes sense and even this is shaky at best.

There's a MitB PPV coming up four months after 'Mania. Maybe the concept is to have two MitB matches. RAW has a match with 5 or 6 guys. SD has a match with 5 or 6 guys. The contract they get is only good for the title on their brand. Maybe go the whole nine yards so it makes sense to the kiddies by having the briefcases be red and blue respectively.

That way, the Wrestlemania MitB match still feels special. That case will be good for either title and more guys compete. It raises that win a level.

Granted, no matter how many ways you slice it ten guys is already at least four too many thus making the match too spotty but at least this way there would be a teeny tiny ounce of logic behind it all.

*shrugs*

Sorry, that's the best I have.


Posted By: Ron Mexico (Guest)  on March 14, 2010 at 09:15 PM

 
 
Who are these people? Zach Brown's comments are impressively stupid.

Posted By: Guest#1790 (Guest)  on March 15, 2010 at 04:53 AM

 
 
CM Punk and the Straight Edge Society is a recycled Right to Censor without the humour or intensity. I've seen it all before and it was throwaway then. Punk can't have a decent match...I saw him wrestle in London and he was awful, blowing spots all over the place. Totally overrated.

Posted By: more cowbell (Guest)  on March 15, 2010 at 10:01 PM

 


www.41mania.com
Copyright (c) 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.