www.411mania.com
|  News |  Columns |  TV Reports |  Video Reviews |  Title History |  Hall of Fame |  News Report |  The Dunn List |
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// Star Wars Episode I Brings In $1.1 Million in Midnight Showings
MUSIC
// First Official Pics of Beyonce and Jay-Z With Blue Ivy Posted
WRESTLING
// Impact Wrestling Rating
POLITICS
// Obama Showing Strongest Poll Numbers In Months
MMA
// Click Here To Join 411’s LIVE XFC 16: High Stakes Coverage
GAMES
// Star Trek Sequel Game in the Works


 HOT TOPICS
//  CM Punk
//  John Cena
//  Triple H
//  Hulk Hogan
//  Randy Orton
//  Christian
SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds





Follow 411mania on Twitter!




Add 411 On Facebook
 



 
 411mania » Wrestling » Columns



Advertisement
411Mania’s Countdown to Wrestlemania XXVI 03.20.10: Austin vs. Hart at WrestleMania - Most Important Match Ever?
Posted by Len Archibald on 03.20.2010





Good day, foreign film fanatics…!

…wait.

I'm in the wrong section. How the hell did I get here, and what the hell does some movie-snob indie-film and pretentious oversea film lover (and probably dirty liberal commie bastard) know about pro-wrestling?

BANNER!



Eh...That's good...Not great...



That's better. Thanks, Meehan!

THE BACKGROUND



Let's start with my first wrestling memory: a bloody Ric Flair being hoisted on the shoulders of other wrestlers after defeating Harley Race for the NWA World Heavyweight title. I'll be honest, I don't know where I saw it or what the circumstances were (I would have been a lil' tyke), but it is the very first image of a wrestling ring that I always go back to. My father was a big time wrestling fan. He would take me to house shows in the famed Maple Leaf Gardens in Toronto. I used to watch "WWF Cavalcade" that was based out of Hamilton's CHCH 11 channel every Saturday evening at 6pm. If I remember correctly, the great Billy Red Lyons hosted that show, where they always plugged house shows in Hamilton's Copps Coliseum and other Canadian venues.

I went to a supershow at Exhibition place – and my childhood live wrestling experience culminated with "The Ultimate Challenge" at WrestleMania VI in SkyDome (now The Rogers Center.) I remember the day of that show, The Toronto Sun's front page had a split picture of Hulk Hogan and The Ultimate Warrior posing for the photogs. Jerry Lawler got on Warrior for wearing a baseball cap when he should've been in character when he returned in the weeks after WrestleMania XII, but in this picture – Warrior didn't look intense at all. In a cap, sunglasses and normal clothes, he looked like a young bodybuilder that was happy to be here. Also, since I am a Canadian, I can say with 100% authority that, yes – Bret Hart is a GOD here. In fact, I would go so far to say that Hart is probably the most recognizable Canadian figure in sports after Wayne Gretzky. Growing up I was pretty much trained to understand these three facets of Canada: 1) Pride 2) Hockey 3) Wrestling.

I'm not the guy who runs Ask 411 for the Wrestling Zone, but I consider myself as someone in touch with the history of pro-wrestling from the old days of black & white TV and Gorgeous George to the territorial structure that became widespread in the 60's and 70's up to the present day events where two companies (well, if one wants to be technical – one) rule the roost in North America with hundreds of little indies scattered. I've watched everything; from WWF, WCW, ECW, New Japan, NOAH, TNA, NWA:TNA, old school NWA, AWA, Calgary Stampede, Memphis, WCCW, CHIKARA, ROH, GLOW (yes, I admit that), and I've even grown a perverse desire to watch Celebrity Championship Wrestling and…Wrestlelicious *facepalm*. If there's a wrestling ring and some sort of grappling going on, I'm aware of it in some way. I don't want to say I'm an expert, but I've been around the block – even helping out as a cameraman for WAR Wrestling, an indie promotion based out of Lima, OH (hometown of one Al Snow.)

I recently read Aaron Hubbard's Contentious Ten, where he ranked "The Greatest Matches in WrestleMania History", and he placed the Stone Cold Steve Austin vs. Bret "The Hitman" Hart "I Quit" match at #1. Some agreed, some disagreed. I noticed a lot of love for the WM XX Triple Threat main event between Triple H, HBK and Chris Benoit. LOTS of love for Y2J-HBK at WrestleMania XIX. Everyone has their own opinions and they are all valid…because they are opinions. Of course, I agree with Hubbard's ranking of Austin/Hart – and since we're in WresleMania Season and we at 411 are dedicating columns in celebration of the "Countdown to WrestleMania", I figured to throw my hat in the…what does one throw their hat into anyways?

Now, a quick caveat: I am older than Hubbard, but I don't think I'm as cynical or as "nit-picky" about things as he is. That's not a knock on him, just pointing out that even though we agree on something, that doesn't mean we share the exact same philosophy in regards to what professional wrestling needs to entertain effectively. Hubbard is into technique and storytelling in the ring, while I'm into the spectacle and the intangible things that make pro wrestling resonate past cultural barriers. Hogan/Andre is not a technical masterpiece, but the moment that Hogan slammed Andre brought wrestling to a moment of worldwide reverence that is rarely matched. Hubbard didn't rank Hogan/Rock in his Top 10 Greatest Wrestling Matches: it would be in my Top 5 – reason being of course, I was THERE, in Toronto, completely transfixed on how two mere men were able to make a structure with over 67,000 people tremble by way of the rabid audience just by the execution of the simplest moves. While great wrestling matches can contain moments of greatness, only a few great matches are recognized in full as actual "moments" – that is what separates Undertaker/HBK at last year's WrestleMania from the Undertaker/Mankind Hell in a Cell match. I truly believe that the reaction of the crowd DOES make or break a match: these guys are first and foremost, LIVE entertainers; if they can't get the LIVE audience to react to every move they make, they should NOT be in this industry. It's the same as being a stage actor; if one can't get the live audience compelled and suspending disbelief with their performance and stage presence, they probably shouldn't be acting. Anywhere.

But enough about my past and what brought me to the dance: I'm here to discuss Hart/Austin. Take a trip with me as I attempt to weave your minds and memories into the events that led to this match. For those who began following wrestling during or post-"Attitude" era, I understand it may be hard to truly express the wrestling landscape at the time. For those who know wrestling existed before 1998 – or better yet, 1983, I hope I will be able to do justice in stirring up your experiences during this time.

THE HISTORY



Here's the thing about Austin/Hart that puts it in another class with other WrestleMania –or- any other match for that matter: Hindsight and perspective. The way that some rate the WM XX main event now based from hindsight of Benoit going bat-shit insane is the same tangible in regards to looking at Austin/Hart. This was a perfect storm, and arguably the most important match/storyline in modern wrestling history. Yes, I said it. I will try to now explain why.

The previous year: 1996 – Shawn Michaels accomplishes his "boyhood dream" in the kid-friendly "New Generation" years of the WWF by defeating Bret "The Hitman" Hart in "overtime" of a grueling 60-minute Iron Man Match for the WWF Title at WrestleMania XII. After a while, his "goody goody sexy boy" act starts to wear thin for those who followed the largest wrestling organization in the world. Fans discover a little Philadelphia-based promotion called ECW, and a group of WWF castaways forming a stable called the n.W.o. in WCW when Hulk Hogan - the ultimate good guy for years – turns heel, aligns himself with Scott Hall and Kevin Nash and somehow becomes cooler. A quick footnote: before Kevin Nash emerged in WCW, his final match in the WWF was against Shawn Michaels for the WWF Title at an In Your House PPV titled "Good Friends, Better Enemies" in which the highlight of the match saw heel Kevin Nash use the prosthetic leg of future WWE Hall of Famer Maurice "Mad Dog" Vachon on babyface HBK. I remember watching this match at a friends house and we all thought that was the single coolest thing ever. This was a precursor to the changing "attitude" of the North American wrestling fanbase.

We're introduced to "The Ringmaster" Steve Austin – a baldheadded scumbag who was hand picked by The Million Dollar Man Ted DiBiase to carry his Million Dollar Belt. After a few fits and starts, Austin eventually sheds "The Ringmaster" moniker, and embraces a new one: "Stone Cold" Steve Austin. He "intentionally" loses a match against his mid-card foe at the time, Savio Vega where DiBiase is banished from the WWF. Austin feels that DiBiase was holding him back from being the best. Later, Austin steamrolls through the 1996 "King of the Ring" tournament and "Austin 3:16" is born. Despite being booked as a baddie, Austin rose as a favorite from the trickling of the "so bad its cool" contingent of fans from ECW and WCW (one may not realize it, but Austin saying "ass" was such a BIG DEAL at the time, it was ridiculous – and his casual vulgarity was an undeniable reason for his initial success.) At this point as well, WCW was basically teetering on the verge of putting the WWF out of business completely, crushing them in nearly every category that matters to make a business survive on the back of the n.W.o. (Rey Mis-SPEAR-io, anyone? I miss lawn-darts.)

Hart basically disappeared after the WM XII Iron Man match. As much as I don't like to get into the "stereotypes" of male wrestling fans, Bret represented the whole "man's man" kinda character while Shawn Michaels, even though as technically sound as Bret, was *too* flamboyant – I think to the point where his sexuality was questioned. Those fans don't want a WWF champion who they have to wonder which team he bats for. After defeating Vader (again, a more "manly" character) at the 1996 edition of SummerSlam, the fan backlash began.

Enter Sid. Now, Sycho Sid wasn't the best wrestler on the planet, but his character was insanely (haha) cool and resonated with the new breed of adrenaline rush-bloodthirsty "smarter" fan. Sid was HUGE. Sid was NUTS. Sid was OVER (some may try to re-write history and say he wasn't: he may not have been a moneymaker, but the live audience loved nearly everything he did.) People wanted to see someone kick the snot out of the "boy toy" and Sid was their champion. Sid had an "attitude" mixed in with his lack of sanity and got fans to chant that he was the "MASTER. AND RULER. OF THE WORLD!" It worked like gangbusters, because even though Sid could never carry – or be carried to a "5-Star Match", he had a 5-Star character that people dug.



At the same time, as Bret Hart was about to return to the WWF, Austin's stock rose to heights that no one could have expected after King of the Ring. He did vignettes mocking Hart (some of the best ever done that truly matched the attitude and swagger of a character.) As mentioned before, Hart represented the more "traditional, manly" type of wrestler – but put him beside Stone Cold's rebellious streak, though – something that Bret was never known for, and compared to Austin, Hart looked like a sissy. Bret still had friends and always treated the ring as a way to *earn* respect and adoration from fans and peers. Austin, really – couldn't give two shits about fans OR peers. He hated everyone and everyone hated him. For some reason, though – that "attitude" resonated with the new jaded and more cynical fan. Whatever the cultural climate was at the time, Austin had literally caught lightning in a bottle. Even though people "respected" Hart's technical acumen, desire and nobility (from a character standpoint), they UNDERSTOOD and RELATED to Austin, who was basically telling everyone to screw themselves and he was going to get his no matter who he had to step over. If that meant the "great" Bret Hart, so be it.

So Bret returns at the 1996 Survivor Series and wrestles Austin. That's the key word, here. He wrestled Austin. Austin was basically able to match Bret move for move. In all actuality, the only reason Austin LOST that first match (in kayfabe terms) was because of his need to take Bret out of the picture for good, not letting go of the Million Dollar Dream. At this time, the hatred for Shawn Michaels from the core WWF fanbase was about to reach a fever pitch, one that had not been reached since the fans turned on Hulk Hogan before his temporary exit with the company leading up to WrestleMania VIII (which, coincidentally, SID was at the center of.) Two more testosterone-driven men basically stole HBK's thunder…and *HE'S* the champion? An important footnote: a "goodie two shoes" character named Rocky Maivia was the sole survivor in his Survivor Series tag match.

Fast forward to the 1997 Royal Rumble. Sid gets cheered for every dirty trick he uses. When he smashes that camera on Shawn Michaels' "Mentor", Jose Litario and the crowd ERUPTS, it was undeniable that the fans no longer wanted to embrace HBK's current characterization. It is this match that becomes ground zero for HBK's D-Generation X "attitude" (there's that word again.)

That same evening, Steve Austin gives one of the single most entertaining performances in history during the Royal Rumble event, tossing everyone out right and left, sitting on the turnbuckle and looking at his imaginary watch. He had this new breed of fan eating out of the palms of his hands. Even though he cheated, and used nefarious means to win the Rumble, if one has the original airing, it's terribly obvious that the crowd WANTED Austin to win – and probably preferred that he broke the rules to do so. This led to the "hot-potato" passing of the WWF Championship in early 1997 that eventually made its way to Sid for WrestleMania 13.

THE MATCH



During all this, Bret had stayed true to his character: a noble man who fought against all odds – but something new was bubbling underneath. There were chinks in his armor. Hart, from a storyline standpoint could not understand why his nobility was being rejected by fans, while Austin's rebellious nature was being embraced. It was Hart, for the first time ever – that acknowledged Vince McMahon as some sort of on-air authority figure. It was the worst kept secret in the world that Vince McMahon was the WWF owner, but it was NEVER explained on camera. When The Undertaker cost Bret his newly won WWF title at the expense of Sid during a cage match on Monday Night RAW, Bret literally snapped. He was being left behind by everyone and he didn't understand. He made threats to Vince. He told Vince he needed to "fix" things. Bret's star was waning. No longer was he the noble man who accepted defeat but was so valiant to fight another day. Now, he was a whiner. A complainer – and a man who found fault in everyone but himself. Austin was the antithesis to all of that, as he kicked ass, got his ass kicked, but never made an excuse out of it. He just wanted to be the best. Again, who do you think the crowd accepted?

I won't spend much time on the "I Quit" match itself, just the bullet-points: EVERYTHING about this match is perfect. It doesn't run too long. It isn't a 20 minute match crammed into eight minutes. There are no true "rest" periods. The video leading to the match that explains Hart's moral dilemma is exceptional. The "Austin 3:16" glass entrance that shatters as Stone Cold marches through is one of the coolest entrances I've ever seen in its simplicity – followed by the symbolism of Hart having to step over the broken glass to get to Austin. The 3-Man commentary between Jerry Lawler, Jim Ross and Vince McMahon is outstanding, and became the template for the Ross/Lawler tandem behind the desk. Listen to how the match even starts: Vince berates Hart for his "attitude" and The King is about to explain that McMahon called Bret a "son of a…" but before he could finish, Austin tackles Hart and the match begins. They grapple, they brawl, Austin takes a drink before chucking it at Hart. Listen to the crowd as Austin gives that first chair shot to Hart who sits on the turnbuckle and the flashbulbs that erupt as Austin performs the now iconic head swivel he does when he's pissed before crushing "The Hitman" with a second shot to his back. I remember watching WrestleMania 13 with a group of ten or so friends and we all knew from that moment that Stone Cold was destined to be not just "a" star, but THE star. Sometimes you never know where the next big pop-culture phenomenon will come from, but when you see it – 9 times out of 10 – you recognize it instantly. There was no doubt Austin was on the verge to cross a cultural barrier that only a small handful of pro-wrestlers ever tasted.

Fast-forward to the infamous double-turn where Austin lays in a pool of his own blood and Bret wins (or at least, is "awarded" victory because of Austin's resiliency.) I can't stress from a character standpoint how pitch-perfect this was in its execution. If Austin struggled for too long or too short before passing out, the ending of the match would have been perceived as too contrived. If Hart decided to pummel Austin to death with a chair after the match instead of just literally kicking him when he was down, it would have been too out of character for "The Hitman". If the special guest referee Ken Shamrock made his presence felt at anytime during the match, the impact of him taking down Bret in defense of Austin would have been lost. It was imperative to show the two grapplers exiting the ring as well: Bret, after being challenged by Shamrock – casually exits to a chorus of boos (and some confused cheers), while Austin's name is chanted as he stuns a referee who attempted to help him up to his feet. Austin limped down the aisle on his own terms and in that moment, became the face of the WWF and the company's changing "attitude".

THE CHAIN-REACTION



Here's the ripple effect from this one match:

1-Austin is given the rocket and shoots to the heights that the WWF had not seen since Hulk Hogan (who, ironically enough, works for the competition.)

2-HBK has a shift in "attitude" and forms DX with some guy named Hunter Hearst Helmsley. They take Austin's vulgarity and recklessness and amp it up to 1000, thus nuetering the "rebellious" nature of WCW's glory days.

3-Bret's shift in "attitude" leads to him forming the "New Hart Foundation" (making peace with his brother Owen in the process), and with that creates the insanely brilliant US vs. Canada storyline. Who's the main target of Hart's anti-US rage? "Stone Cold" Steve Austin.

4-That leads to SummerSlam 1997, in which Bret defeats The Undertaker for the WWF title, with an unintentional assist from special guest ref HBK from a steel chair. At that same show, Owen Hart accidentally breaks Austin's neck during an IC Title match (which Austin wins.)

5-That "assist" leads to Taker basically making Michaels life a living hell which culminates in the first ever Hell in a Cell match at "In Your House: Badd Blood" which sees Kane's debut. Hell in a Cell is such a successful gimmick that it is used nearly a year later with Mick Foley and The Undertaker. We all know what happened there. The feud between Taker and HBK comes to a conclusion at the 1998 Royal Rumble where a spot sees Michaels injure his back to the point where he is gone for over four years.

6-Austin, already known as a badass who will walk through hell before he ever risks losing his reputation as being the best and toughest SOB on the planet, is seen as even TOUGHER when stories come to light that he DID finish his match with Owen with a broken neck. He needs to vacate the IC title. Owen Hart gets it back.

7-"Die Rocky Die" chants erupt because Rocky Maivia's "noble hero act" is seen as nothing more that a Hogan/Hart re-tread in a time where the "cool heels" rule the roost. He makes a shift in "attitude" and transforms himself into a little phenomena known as "The Rock", and becomes the yin to Austin's yang.

8-Survivor Series 1997 happens. The screwjob. Austin basically crushes Owen Hart and wins the IC title. He and The Rock collide in a mini-feud that becomes ground zero for their epic encounters years later.

9-The "Mr. McMahon" character is born, and from it – the storyline that would rule 1998 and would bring the WWF back to the top of the wrestling world. Vince convinces Mike Tyson to become part of WWF storylines – specifically, with Austin - while WCW counters with Dennis Rodman, Jay Leno and "One Warrior Nation". The "Austin Era" begins with Stone Cold defeating Shawn Michaels to become WWF Champion for the first time at WrestleMania XIV. The one-of-a-kind overbooking of Over the Edge. Mankind tossed off a cell. The emergence of Chyna and HBK "dropping the ball". That leads to the "reformation" of DX that includes the New Age Outlaws. That leads to X-Pac returning the night after WresleMania. That led to a feud between HHH's DX and The Rock's "Nation of Domination" that culminated in the two being made as main eventers in SummerSlam's IC Ladder Match.

10-Hart arrives in WCW and the "bookers" basically botch the Starcade 97 main event between Sting and Hogan - which should have been WCW's biggest show in history. It "came crashing down and hurt inside" from there (sorry, I couldn't resist.)

11-Austin's rise brought about Bill Goldberg - who even if it was "coincidence" that the bald head, goatee and black trunks matched Austin's look, there was no doubt that it didn't "spring" in Eric Bischoff's mind – since he basically considered Austin to be no more than a permanent mid-carder; Hart flounders in WCW and the shine he had in the WWF disappeared. Goldberg's rise leads to a "collision course" with Hart, in a match that basically ended his in ring career.

12-Austin would be on top of the mountain at the same time, with The Rock, Triple H, The Undertaker, Mankind, Chyna, Sable, DX, Kane, Ken Shamrock and others not too far behind. WCW's stranglehold on the wrestling world was over from the star power that the WWF provided. Now that they had money, power and influence again, they signed all of WCW's big dogs who never got a chance to shine: Jericho, Guererro, Malenko, Saturn, Benoit. From ECW, they got Taz (Tazz) and The Dudley Boys. ECW never recovered from that. The Hardys and Edge and Christian joined the ranks to bring tag team wrestling to new insane heights (literally.) Vince McMahon signs Kurt Angle. While WCW was floundering with the same old storylines and revolving door characters, the WWF had an influx of new, interesting talent.

13-Then WCW goes out of business. Yes, the Time-AOL merger basically killed WCW, but I don't think it would have been killed so quickly if WCW wasn't losing so much money and fans at such an alarming rate to the WWF at the time.

THE LEGACY



So here's the final piece: hindsight. Look at the WWF in 1997 before *and* after the Bret Hart/Steve Austin match. That was the "Attitude Era" in a nutshell. Hart was the babyface of "The New Generation" after Hulk Hogan left for WCW. Austin was the foul-mouthed sonovabitch that didn't care about that generation, or the one that preceded it for that matter. It was a story of two forces who justifiably stood for what they believed in and the collision was so epic that it caused a chain of events that is still felt up to this day. Austin, as a guest host, presided over the contract signing between two of his two biggest foes: Hart and McMahon (how epic would it be if The Rock was the special guest ref? What an insane dynamic that could have caused...) Austin/Hart at WrestleMania 13 did more to help the WWF in the way that the Sting/Hogan Starrcade match hurt WCW. It was the presentation, the talent, the culture, the fans, and all the little intangibles that made Austin/Hart not only in my opinion, the greatest WM match in history, the greatest fued in wrestling history – but perhaps the most important of the modern era.

Whoa, now. Even more important than Hulk/Andre? In my opinion, yes. WrestleMania III was the crowning achievement in regards to the brand awareness of the WWF. No one is going to compete with 93,000 people in the Silverdome (do NOT get on me about the "kayfabe" number: my cousin was there and is from Detroit. She knows that the Silverdome easily holds 81,000 people for a football game in normal stadium seating. I don't think it would have been too hard to add a little over 10,000 more on the floor.) There was really nothing on the line creatively or financially that hinged on the success of Hulk/Andre. Yes, more people saw it, more people recognize it, but it really didn't *change* the ENTIRE landscape of wrestling in North America. Where did Andre go after WM III? What was the DIRECT ripple effect from Andre ripping Hulk's crucifix (as much as a sweet moment it was)? I would crown WrestleMania III as a whole as the most important SHOW in wrestling history, as it became the template for "WrestleMania Season" and created the spectacle event that all televised sporting events aspire to be.

Compare Hulk/Andre to that of Hart/Austin, though, and look at my bullet points above. DIRECTLY and INDIRECTLY, the chain of events from the "I Quit" match led to the death of TWO major North American wrestling promotions, leaving the WWE as the only mainstream wrestling company standing (for a few years.) The WWF at the time was barely hanging on financially and creatively. WCW was really one major event away from changing history; personally, I think if they held off Goldberg vs. Hogan until Starrcade 1998 and worked the exact same match with the exact same result, in the exact same venue, there would be no TNA, because WCW would still be here. The WWF needed to catch white lightning, and didn't really expect it. That's the other point about hindsight: one never sees how important something is until time passes. Watch the presentation of WrestleMania II, III, IV and V. How much changed? What was different about the landscape of the characters, the storylines and the fans? Now watch WrestleMania XII, XIII and XIV. It's like night and day in a shorter period of time. That's what Austin/Hart did, and no one saw it coming. Everyone figured that no matter the outcome of Hulk/Andre, there would be a definite effect on the industry.

Still not convinced? I ask for you do to one final thing: sit back and ask yourself "what would the wrestling world be like if that match NEVER HAPPENED?"

{Wrestling Passport Stamped]


Sponsored by...

BEATING TRAFFIC Trailer:



Questions or comments? Completely disagreed with any of my picks? Are you in love with me? Leave comments below or email me at aa24frames@aol.com!!!

Bookmark 411mania.com on your computer!

-or-

Check us out at Twitter!

TWITTER

http://www.twitter.com/411mania
http://www.twitter.com/411wrestling
http://www.twitter.com/411moviestv
http://www.twitter.com/411music
http://www.twitter.com/411games
http://www.twitter.com/411mma


Post Comment (57)  |  Email Len Archibald  |  View Len Archibald's 411 Profile

  Send To Friend  |    Stumble It!  |    Digg It!  | 



Please add your comment below.
If you are registered, you can login and post under your registered name. If not, you can post as a guest or register.

* Please note that 411 moderates all comments. Your comment will show up on the site after it has been approved by an editor.
 
Name : 
Comment : 
Remaining Characters : 
2800
 

Comments (57)

 
Agreed Len - it is arguably, if not *the* most important match of the modern era. All the implications you mentioned in the article point to that fact.

Posted By: Nick M. (Guest)  on March 19, 2010 at 11:09 PM

 
 
You sir are amazing. I have been thoroughly convinced.

Posted By: Big Tex (Guest)  on March 19, 2010 at 11:27 PM

 
 
I don't think anybody will debate you on this one. As long as Hogan/Andre isn't considered part of the "modern" era, this is it hands down. It's just a shame that this match really led to Bret Hart's downfall IMO. Austin's character changed the whole dynamic of the company, and that left Bret as the odd man out.

Although, to be honest, I don't think the Hitman had ever recovered from losing to HBK at Wrestlemania 12. Bret took wrestling way too seriously, and he felt like that was the day that the company discarded him in favor of Shawn.


Posted By: Guest#4203 (Guest)  on March 19, 2010 at 11:31 PM

 
 
The WWF at the time was barely hanging on financially and creatively. WCW was really one major event away from changing history
------------------------------------
Umm, it was my understanding that the WWF always made money. In a nutshell they were never actually close to going out of business, they would have had to actually start losing money first. On the other hand I wouldn't be that surprised if WCW was actually losing money even at that point in time. (Given how they were throwing around large sums of money at any wrestler they could find.)


Posted By: Dave (Guest)  on March 19, 2010 at 11:42 PM

 
 
I was in the crowd for that match and still remember the entire mood of the arena shifting from Bret to Austin as it went on. Astounding as a match and as a major shift for the wrestling landscape.

Posted By: M A Weyer (Registered)  on March 19, 2010 at 11:58 PM

 
 
The WWF at the time was barely hanging on financially and creatively. WCW was really one major event away from changing history
------------------------------------
Umm, it was my understanding that the WWF always made money. In a nutshell they were never actually close to going out of business, they would have had to actually start losing money first. On the other hand I wouldn't be that surprised if WCW was actually losing money even at that point in time. (Given how they were throwing around large sums of money at any wrestler they could find.)

Posted By: Dave (Guest) on March 19, 2010 at 11:42 PM

According to Vince, they were indeed losing gobs of money, and I remember plenty of news reports from actual mainstream news shows that wrestling was dying at the time. The rationale for pushing Bret out of the company was that they couldn't afford his contract. Maybe it was BS, but certainly all signs point to the WWF being in very dire straits around that time.

If Austin doesn't rise right then, it's very possible the WWF does go under, and gets bought out by WCW or otherwise changes in some way or another. Bret was actually barely holding the company together right around that point, when HBK got the belt things got even worse at that time.


Posted By: Guest#0120 (Guest)  on March 20, 2010 at 12:02 AM

 
 
Great article, loved the thought put into it.

Couldn't agree more!


Posted By: Guest#4929 (Guest)  on March 20, 2010 at 12:17 AM

 
 
Really great stuff, and you're right about this being the most important match.

God the promos were great for that fued. When Bret Hart is giving good promos, good HEEL promos nonetheless, you know it's working. And that segment where Austin attacks Hart in the back of the ambulance is one of my favorite ever.

You missed the Spring Stampede PPV. One of the best PPV's of all time with one of the best crowds of all time, with one of the best main events of all time. What a fued.


Posted By: Denton56 (Guest)  on March 20, 2010 at 12:21 AM

 
 
You simply listed a bunch of events that occurred after the Austin-Hart match without showing how they directly resulted from it. You mean to tell me that DX never would've happeend if it weren't for Austin-Hart? Or that Rocky Maivia never would've become the Rock. Don't get me wrong - it wad definitely an important match but to suggest that all of those events wouldn't have happened without it is just silly.

Posted By: Bob (Guest)  on March 20, 2010 at 12:22 AM

 
 
Get Len Archibald in Wrestling, the young man can write, this was a tremendous column. Larry get him in, get him in!

Posted By: Jake (Guest)  on March 20, 2010 at 12:35 AM

 
 
While I personally don't think it's the greatest wrestlemania match ever. It certainly is the most important, probably the most important wrestling match ever, if i can swing it that way. It did pretty much start a "ripple" as you said, and changed the industry forever and changed the way the business worked. I don't think people deny its importance, it's just that there are other matches at wm that are simply...better matches.

Posted By: gooched (Guest)  on March 20, 2010 at 12:50 AM

 
 
Somewhere, Jake Chambers is facepalming thinking to himself.... 'you know what self. This is a well constructed piece of writing. It has a central theme, supported by numerous, well written and highly convincing arguments, without any words being bold, because the writing actually brings the point across, not the thickness of my words... DAMN! where the FUCK, did i go wrong as a writer.. should i... should i maybe put the keyboard and pen down and retire'? Bless you, Len Archibald, for restoring my faith in 411.

Posted By: KMac (Guest)  on March 20, 2010 at 01:15 AM

 
 
Well said. By the way, it was a Submission match, not an I Quit match.

Posted By: Eddie Mac (Guest)  on March 20, 2010 at 01:17 AM

 
 
Really fantastic article. A great well-written, well thought out argument. I don't agree with all your points (I don't see how Bret-Austin affected Rocky's heel turn at all) but all around a solid piece of business.

Posted By: Mark (Guest)  on March 20, 2010 at 01:28 AM

 
 
All of these 'countdown' columns have been almost exactly the same, and they are really wearing thin already.

Just more over-rating the Austin-Bret match for another article....yawn!


Posted By: Industry (Guest)  on March 20, 2010 at 02:30 AM

 
 
You simply listed a bunch of events that occurred after the Austin-Hart match without showing how they directly resulted from it. You mean to tell me that DX never would've happeend if it weren't for Austin-Hart? Or that Rocky Maivia never would've become the Rock. Don't get me wrong - it wad definitely an important match but to suggest that all of those events wouldn't have happened without it is just silly.

Posted By: Bob (Guest) on March 20, 2010 at 12:22 AM

----------------------------------------

He never said those events wouldn't have happened without Austin/Hart WM13, just that the fact that the match (and everything surrounding it) DID happen and it DID lead to those things.


Posted By: thefixxxer (Guest)  on March 20, 2010 at 03:22 AM

 
 
very great read. i saw this article, and i thought "damn, here's another guy overrated this match to the moon". but, i've got to admit after reading it, you may have just swayed me in terms of the historical significance of the match. everything was very well put.

Posted By: Csonkamaniac III (Guest)  on March 20, 2010 at 03:38 AM

 
 
Great Job ! I have felt the same and debated these events before with friends and they agreed. Have a Steveweiser , good job.

Posted By: Vampiro56 (Guest)  on March 20, 2010 at 04:30 AM

 
 
That was a really great read, the only think I would contest was that my memory of the 97 Rumble has always been the crowd going absolutely MENTAL for Shawn because I think it was in his hometown?

Hard to disagree with too much else though. I've always put WM3 on the pedestal in terms of importance but you may have convinced me.


Posted By: GIMH (Registered)  on March 20, 2010 at 06:41 AM

 
 
I liked your story about your first wresting memory, so I thought I would share mine. The very first wresting memory, and it might be my first memory I can go back to was watching Greg Valentine and Roddy Piper in the Dog Collar match for the US title from the first Starcade. Now I know it wasn't the live event I saw because I was one at the time. I do know I saw the match, but it might have been a rental. But still this was back in 85' or so and I remember asking my dad why Piper was moving funny. He told me about his ear and how that effects your balance.

I really enjoyed watching it with him and I asked him to see more. That is when we started to go to Portland Wrestling every weekend until I Down Owens got shut down in the early 90's, but I have been a fan the entire time, all thanks to watching it with my dad at a young age as well.


Posted By: Terra (Guest)  on March 20, 2010 at 07:44 AM

 
 
in my opinion this was the greatest feud of all time. everyone knew hart and michaels didnt get along. because of that animosity they rarely worked together. meanwhile hart and austin had a chemistry that made you believe they despised each other.

and contrary to popular belief, an established veteran doesnt have to lose to give a new star a rub. bret beat austin EVERY time (except once to explain hart's knee surgery).


Posted By: rey (Guest)  on March 20, 2010 at 08:50 AM

 
 
One of my favorite Mania matches and an important one but not THE most important, that would be Hogan & Mr. T vs Orndorff & Piper. If the first Mania flopped Vince and Linda would've been bankrupt, NWA/Crockette Promotions would be the dominant brand in the world today so the sucess of the first show and the draw of the main event shaped the last 25 years of wrestling in the western world. Austin/Bret was great but I think Austin would still have become a monster draw anyway, it just would've taken longer

Posted By: Guest#4802 (Guest)  on March 20, 2010 at 09:03 AM

 
 
actually it was kevin nash who was the first to acknowledge vince as the owner of the wwf. after he lost the title and turned heel, nash would point at vince, stare him down at ringside and berate him within earshot of the mic. lawler would play along and ask vince why diesel was angry at him.

i remember the 97 rumble. the best part without a doubt was austin sitting on the turnbuckle in the ring by himself just waiting. the crowd counted down. that guitar riff hit. the building EXPLODED and austin crapped his pants.


Posted By: jd (Guest)  on March 20, 2010 at 09:28 AM

 
 
Nice article, one of the best on here for a couple of weeks I reckon.

That said, it's no wonder Austin got over though if he "literally caught lightning in a bottle". That's a pretty impressive feat right there. I don't even know how someone could pull that off.


Posted By: Guest#9254 (Guest)  on March 20, 2010 at 09:30 AM

 
 
no mention that it was Bret's idea to sign Austin in the first place? Bret knew Austin was a star and wanted to work with him from the moment he saw him on WCW TV.

Posted By: Guest#4972 (Guest)  on March 20, 2010 at 10:37 AM

 
 
Preaching to the choir over here - I've been enthralled by the match since WM13 and it's only improved with hindsight - but this was most definitely one of the best articles I've read on 411 in a while, certainly the best of the Wrestlemania Countdown bunch! Good job!

Posted By: Guest #9001 (Guest)  on March 20, 2010 at 10:46 AM

 
 
actually it was kevin nash who was the first to acknowledge vince as the owner of the wwf. after he lost the title and turned heel, nash would point at vince, stare him down at ringside and berate him within earshot of the mic. lawler would play along and ask vince why diesel was angry at him.

i remember the 97 rumble. the best part without a doubt was austin sitting on the turnbuckle in the ring by himself just waiting. the crowd counted down. that guitar riff hit. the building EXPLODED and austin crapped his pants.

Posted By: jd (Guest) on March 20, 2010 at 09:28 AM

What are you talking about????


Posted By: guest (Guest)  on March 20, 2010 at 10:49 AM

 
 
One of my favorite Mania matches and an important one but not THE most important, that would be Hogan & Mr. T vs Orndorff & Piper. If the first Mania flopped Vince and Linda would've been bankrupt, NWA/Crockette Promotions would be the dominant brand in the world today so the sucess of the first show and the draw of the main event shaped the last 25 years of wrestling in the western world. Austin/Bret was great but I think Austin would still have become a monster draw anyway, it just would've taken longer

Posted By: Guest#4802 (Guest) on March 20, 2010 at 09:03 AM

Yeah. Having been a big fan when both matches happened, the Wrestlemania I main event had more impact, particularly for the mainstream attention it gathered, and how it led to the death of the regional promotion system. Hogan is on the cover of Sports Illustrated, Piper is a regular on MTV, and the seeds for the death of the AWA, WCCW, and even the NWA are sown. Austin/Hart led to a peak in wrestling, but Wrestlemania I brought wrestling culturally front and centre for the first time since the 1950's.

Still, great article. A cut above.


Posted By: Canucklehead (Guest)  on March 20, 2010 at 11:01 AM

 
 
Excellent article! You should show this to hacks like Jake Chambers and Aaron Hubbard as an example of good writing.

Posted By: Guest#8247 (Guest)  on March 20, 2010 at 11:03 AM

 
 
Very good artilce, and it is interesting to note the potential ripple effect of that match. The only other modern match I could consider on that level is the WMX Ladder match, which contributed to the following:

1. Began the shift towards a more spot-oriented form of wrestling, one that ECW would emulate to the fullest, and one that the WWF/E would highlight. Without this match, you don't get the dozens and dozens of descendents, including the WWF tag ladder & TLC matches of the late 90's and early 00's, which elevated Edge, Christian and both Hardys--as well as the MITB match which has been an important road for superstars Edge & CM Punk.

2. This elevated Razor Ramon from a moderately successful midcarder to a potential main eventer. While Ramon didn't really reap the rewards in the WWF due to his problems, the stardom he faced as a consistent upper midcarder allowed him (as well as his buddy Kevin Nash), to parlay this into the NWO in WCW--which is what propelled Nitro to superstardom.

3. This also did the same thing for Shawn Michaels, even more so since Michaels clearly demonstrated the "it" factor for the world title. From late 2005 on, everyone knew that HBK would become a world champ at WM12. In terms of long-term ripple effects, you can also consider the elevation of HBK as having triggered the "Kliq" elevation as a backstage power, which in turn shifted Hart out as a key force, and triggered the backstage feud between Bret and Shawn. Another ripple effect is that the elevation of Michaels and the subsequent heel turn in 97 was the creation of DX, which helped contribute to the "attitude" era.


Posted By: Michael L (Guest)  on March 20, 2010 at 11:54 AM

 
 
Great article as long as Hogan v Andre is not considered in the modern era.

That is the most important match in the history of pro wrestling bar none. if that match failed - wrestling ppv would have failed and the business would never have grown.


Posted By: Big Dirty (Guest)  on March 20, 2010 at 12:08 PM

 
 
This is the match that SAVED the WWE or WWF or whatever you still call it. If this match never happened, WCW would have beaten WWE and we would still have the NWO running amok today.

Posted By: McWaylon (Guest)  on March 20, 2010 at 12:19 PM

 
 
Great article.

Posted By: Chungles (Guest)  on March 20, 2010 at 12:55 PM

 
 
incredible match workrate intensity telling the story this is the match that made austin and he didnt even win.best match scsa ever ...ever had.another part of the match was the chemistry between the two.maybe the best match ever wm or not.

Posted By: mr x (Guest)  on March 20, 2010 at 01:00 PM

 
 
Couldn't agree more. Austin/Hart is the most awesome fued/match to ever take place in the WWF, and maybe all of American wrestling.

Hogan/Andre is important of course, but cliched as hell, stressing Hogan as having impossible odds so much to the point where it became obvious he was going to win.


Posted By: Bubba (Guest)  on March 20, 2010 at 05:44 PM

 
 
i didn't know wrestling had its own alternate universes too!

Posted By: shabba (Guest)  on March 20, 2010 at 05:51 PM

 
 
You definately need to continue writing a wrestling column in addition to your foreign film one. You could be 411's unofficial wrestling historian.

Posted By: JLAJRC (Guest)  on March 20, 2010 at 06:05 PM

 
 
Awesome.. great read!

Posted By: Z (Guest)  on March 20, 2010 at 06:07 PM

 
 
Excellent article that does a great job recapping the events leading up to and following an amazing match. One little nitpick though:

As someone else pointed out, the crowd in San Antonio did indeed love Shawn Michaels at Royal Rumble '97, and this is the match where he won the WWF Title back from Sid after losing it to him at Survivor Series '96. This led to the whole "losing my smile" thing where he vacated the title, Bret won it in the Final Four match only to lose it to Sid the next night on Raw thanks to Austin. I think you're confusing SS '96 and RR '97 as it was at the Series where the MSG crowd turned on HBK and Sid used the camera on Lothario. Otherwise, good job.


Posted By: Crook (Guest)  on March 20, 2010 at 07:03 PM

 
 
Austin/Bret was great but I think Austin would still have become a monster draw anyway, it just would've taken longer

Posted By: Guest#4802 (Guest) on March 20, 2010 at 09:03 AM

That's the thing, though... Austin couldn't have taken any longer to blow up than he did. If he had, then he'd be doing it in WCW, because the WWF would've gone bankrupt.


Posted By: Guest#5699 (Guest)  on March 20, 2010 at 07:07 PM

 
 
Great article which made for some great points but I respectfully disagree. My most important match/storyline is the whole hostile takeover/"3rd man" deal at Bash at the Beach. Before this happened, WWF was in it's cartoonish wrestlers stage. When the NWO was formed, it turned the tide big time which in my mind forced WWF to switch from the cartoonish style to the "attitude era". The Nwo storyline which led to Sting/Goldberg/many other things was gaining steam until it just got so repititive amongst other horrible mistakes WCW made. It also led to the "evil boss" characther that worked so well with Vince Mcmahon. I think if the Nwo storyline would've never happened, WWF would've never been forced to go to such extremes that they went to. Also one last thing, ECW pretty much never gets it's credit for starting the whole attitude idea and that New Japan company pretty much never gets it's credit becuase WCW stole the Nwo idea from them. While WWF and WCW stole the ideas, they get credit for re-inventing them though. Without ECW and that New Japan company, who knows what would've happened.

Posted By: cj (Guest)  on March 20, 2010 at 08:52 PM

 
 
The only thing that killed Bret Hart's career is the shitty WCW booking. He could have done just as grrat of things in WCW but they completely fucked it up.

And people who think Bret "took wrestling too seriously" need to understand that wrestling wasn't a job or even a career to Bret, it was his life. He was born into a wrestling family, how could he not take it seriously? He hated seeing Shawn on top of the WWF because Shawn was a spoiled brat who the wrestlers didn't respect and didn't deserve the push he was getting. Bret had nothing but the interest of the wrestling industry in mind.


Posted By: 420 (Guest)  on March 20, 2010 at 08:58 PM

 
 
What? Bunch of marks follow the story at an event and cheer who they're told to. WWE follow storylines based on marks reaction.

Am I missing something?


Posted By: Vince McArsehole (Guest)  on March 20, 2010 at 09:20 PM

 
 
"This belt, in the hands of any other man, is just a belt. In my hands it becomes power. Just like this microphone, in the hands of any of the boys in the back, is just a microphone. You put it in the hands of a dangerous man like myself and it becomes a pipe bomb. These words that I speak, spoken by anybody else but me are simply words strung together and loosely formed into sentences. What I say I mean and what I mean I say and they become anthems! You see if I could be afforded the time to tell all of you here today a little bit of a story. It's a parable of sorts.

There was once an old man, walking home from work; he was walking in the snow, and he stumbled upon a snake frozen in the ice. He took that snake and he brought it home and he took care of it and he thawed it out and he nursed it back to health. And as soon as that snake was well enough it bit that old man. And as the old man lay there dying he asked the snake, ‘Why? I took care of you. I loved you. I saved your life.' And that snake looked that man right in the eye and said, ‘You stupid old man. I'm a snake.'

The greatest thing the devil ever did was make you people that he didn't exist. And you're looking at him right now. I am the devil himself! And all of you stupid mindless people fell for it!"

CM Punk; June 18, 2005 at Death Before Dishonor III (ROH)


Posted By: CM Punk (Guest)  on March 20, 2010 at 09:54 PM

 
 
Wait so you're telling me Bret was the reason for The Rock and DX?

Posted By: Guest#7567 (Guest)  on March 21, 2010 at 12:04 AM

 
 
This is the greatest match ever. If anybody says that it's overrated, then they are out of their mind. Stone Cold himself has said on a number of occasions that this is the match of his career.

Posted By: greg (Guest)  on March 21, 2010 at 12:28 AM

 
 
"It was Hart, for the first time ever – that acknowledged Vince McMahon as some sort of on-air authority figure. It was the worst kept secret in the world that Vince McMahon was the WWF owner, but it was NEVER explained on camera."

No. I don't know why people keep saying this. Jim Ross was the one who outed Vince as the WW(F) figurehead during his heel turn promo in 1996 when he introduced the fake Razor Ramon.


Posted By: Tom (Guest)  on March 21, 2010 at 01:00 AM

 
 
Austin didn't actually become Number 1 Babyface until the following year though. Wrestlemania 14 was when he went from very big star to THE big star.

Posted By: Guest#5878 (Guest)  on March 21, 2010 at 04:33 AM

 
 
I agree with some of your points, but not all of them. The Austin/Hart match was very important and very entertaining, but to try to imply that the "Attitude Era" would not have existed without this match is a myopic viewpoint. I believe the WWF was already headed in that direction. WCW was already grittier, ECW was of course hardcore to the max...wrestling was changing, and Vince knew he had to follow. Personally, I consider the late Brian Pillman to be the true founding father of the "Attitude Era"...he took more risks and had the balls to push the envelope farther than anyone else had even dared to imagine at the time.

Posted By: SP (Guest)  on March 21, 2010 at 06:58 AM

 
 
Definetly an importamt turning point in wrestling as it opened up shades of grey and broke down the old heel/face dichotomy. Perfect in its execution as well.

However, the IWC seems in love with this match. To that end I'm almost tired of hearing about it. Are we eulogizing a match that happened a while ago and living in the past?

Ask any regular non-internet fan today and they will most likely never bring this match up. Sorry but that is the truth.

Also, to play the devil's advocate, from a storyline standpoint this was the last match the two had and the feud didn't actually continue.


Posted By: Guest#5809 (Guest)  on March 21, 2010 at 11:46 AM

 
 
agreed. not only the most important wm matches of all time, but the best as far as telling a story in the ring. the only disagreement i have is bret being a GOD. bret has pissed a lot of fans off with his self myth. plus the fact that he has teo mention that EVERY FUCKIN WRESTLER ALIVE at one time or another has told him he is the greatest ever. its a little bit much to take.

Posted By: pjl32 (Guest)  on March 21, 2010 at 01:46 PM

 
 
Excellent article, but it gives too much credit to this match for WWE (then WWF, but I'll refer to it as WWE for these comments) overtaking WCW.

Yes, this match had a ton of impact to catapult Austin. But even though he was so popular after this match, WCW was still kicking WWE (then F)'s ass in the ratings.

What turned the tide by far was McMahon's heel turn to lead to the Austin-McMahon feud. If McMahon hadn't turn heel, WWE would have never overtaken WCW. Before the heel turn, especially as Hart was going to WCW, it looked like WCW would dominate WWE for a long time even with Austin on his way up. Once McMahon turned heel to feud with him, there was finally a sign that there was something in the WWE that would be intriguing enough to tune more fans in even with the All-Star roster WCW had. Yes there were other factors such as bad WCW management, and yes Austin deserves a ton of credit, but Austin wouldn't have been able to beat WCW without McMahon as his nemesis.


Posted By: guest (Guest)  on March 21, 2010 at 02:38 PM

 
 
Worth noting is that right after this match, where he got his butt handed to him in a bloody pulp to the point where he couldn't even answer the ref, Stone Cold started being called the toughest sob in the business. So one could say that this started the hypocrisy and shortsightedness of so many wwe marks.

Posted By: Truth Be Told (Guest)  on March 21, 2010 at 03:55 PM

 
 
I dont usually say this but tremendous work here. I love how you explained and described how well this match was executed. You pointed out a lot of very smart things, like Shamrock's involvement and how Bret kicking Austin while he was down was the right move instead of say hitting him with a chair. Very insightful. Well done. I'm very impressed. -Joe

Posted By: Joe Mastronardo (Guest)  on March 21, 2010 at 07:45 PM

 
 
A few corrections on the '97 Rumble:

Shawn was the major babyface against Sid, especially in his hometown. The camera incident against Lothario was actually at Survivor Series and Shawn gave Sid a receipt with a camera shot of his own at the Rumble. From my memory Sid wasn't ever really as over as he seemed at Survivor Series, and that was only because the goddamn New Yorkers want to be so edgy and cool they decided to cheer the heel, even if the '08 Rumble proved they're just marks like everyone else.

Austin received cheers during the Rumble, yes, but the crowd didn't want him to win...at least not the majority. His crowd reaction was minimal upon his entrance and was nothing compared to Bret's entrance (or Shawn's later) and the crowd popped HUGE when he was eliminated. Yes, a bunch of people popped when he won, but the crowd wasn't defiantly cheering him like, say, they were Randy Orton earlier this year. The crowd was even split at WrestleMania (which I was a part of, bitches) until Bret's fullblown heel turn at the end.

As for this match itself, I can't say anything more about it: greatest match ever. I will add that Shamrock's performance is perfectly understated; too often a special referee is too "special" in that they need to make their voice heard (literally and figuratively), and attempt to steal the spotlight from the wrestlers. Maybe it was Ken's newness to pro wrestling but he did what he was supposed to do perfectly and that was keep the match, erm, fight between the two guys, call it right down the middle, and decide a winner if need-be. And the crowd went apeshit when he took Bret down. It's a shame Shamrock was in the WWF during the Attitude Era cos he really would've fit right in the 2002-04 wrestling-heavy period on SmackDown.


Posted By: neverAcquiesce (Guest)  on March 22, 2010 at 12:11 PM

 
 
Absolutely fantastic Len! I loved the Hart-Austin feud. Here's some other thoughts about what went down in 97-98. Austin becomes a star and Hart becomes a top heel. The Montreal screw job happens, the WWF can't afford Hart and he leaves. At the same show Austin beats Owen. This show directly leads to Austin becoming the number one threat to HBK even before the Rumble. At the Rumble HBK injures his back and leaves for 4 years. With that injury and Hart already gone the backstage drama ends. Everyone is on board to make the WWE become top dog. Austin is pushed to the moon. The Rock and HHH slowly become midcard stars. Foley becomes famous. Most importantly Vince and the writers see the crowd reacting to certain wrestlers and GIVE them what they want to see. Meanwhile in WCW, Sting goes from top face to an afterthought and Hogan continues his stranglehold due to backstage politics. They manage to screw up Bret and Goldberg in the same year. In 1999 the NWO is still around and the same old people are on top. Bret's career is ending, Goldberg is no longer a monster, and the younger stars like Benoit and Jericho are held down. While the WWE created a new star every week, WCW refuses to adapt and evolve. They make the same mistakes WWE did 95-96 yet refuse to change.

Posted By: JM (Guest)  on March 22, 2010 at 01:29 PM

 
 
No, Andre vs. Hogan was the most important match ever. No one would have thought that Hulk Hogan could bodyslam the undefeated Giant.

Posted By: WWF Fan (Guest)  on March 23, 2010 at 05:05 AM

 


www.41mania.com
Copyright � 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.