www.411mania.com
|  News |  Columns |  TV Reports |  Video Reviews |  Title History |  Hall of Fame |  News Report |  The Dunn List |
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// Kelly Brook Gets Glamorously Sexy For Fabulous Magazine
MUSIC
// First Official Pics of Beyonce and Jay-Z With Blue Ivy Posted
WRESTLING
// [VIDEO] Torrie Wilson & Sable Strip Down & Kiss In Lingerie Contest
POLITICS
// Obama Showing Strongest Poll Numbers In Months
MMA
// XFC 16: High Stakes Report 2.10.12
GAMES
// Star Trek Sequel Game in the Works


 HOT TOPICS
//  CM Punk
//  John Cena
//  Triple H
//  Hulk Hogan
//  Randy Orton
//  Christian
SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds





Follow 411mania on Twitter!




Add 411 On Facebook
 



 
 411mania » Wrestling » Columns



Advertisement
Ask 411 Wrestling 03.17.10: Naming Stone Cold, Rescrewing Bret and Shoot Shoots!
Posted by Mathew Sforcina on 03.17.2010



Hello all, and welcome to this edition of Ask 411 Wrestling!

*pauses for applause*

*waits*

*gives up*


Anyway, last week was a bit of a short one, as I said at the outset. But this week, I'm back to my normal work hours, which means this one should be nice and fat. Or at least fatter than last time.

And a good way to get the word count up is to use lots of pretty video and pictures. Like this one!



And I can also cut and paste some appeals for support, like this!

411 on Twitter!

http://www.twitter.com/411mania
http://www.twitter.com/411wrestling
http://www.twitter.com/411moviestv
http://www.twitter.com/411music
http://www.twitter.com/411games
http://www.twitter.com/411mma

Remember, every person who isn't signed up, that's another Nasty Boys match.

Backtalking



Unbreakable Wrestlers: Well, I gave my options, Andrew also offered Hulk Hogan, Iron Shiek, Ricky Steamboat, Bret Hart, Dr Death Steve Williams, Ted DiBiase Sr and Bob Backlund. Of course, Hogan has his knee problems, and Steamboat retired due to injury in-ring, but your mileage may vary.

Every WWE Champion in the HOF?: I stand by my claim, in that while Bruno and Warrior and Savage will need to be dead and buried, as well as Vince, eventually they will get in. It'll just take a while.

CM Punk Ripping Off… Everyone, apparently.: Hey, Punk's SES thing is indeed similar to the Flock. And the Nest. And Sullivan's group. And a whole bunch of other groups. There's only so many ways to make groups in wrestling, and the cult is one of them. Everyone in wrestling rips off something. (Oh, and please don't get me started on AA. You all saw what happened last time I discussed religion in here….)

Tag Teams with Single's Success: I did think about the Rockers, but then I think of them pre-Rockers, they didn't come in together. But then neither did the Steiners, so yes, The Rockers do count under my rules (which I'll admit are pretty generous). And I guess the Thrillseekers too. (And while he didn't win the title, Stevie Rey was, officially, a WCW TV Champion. So he counts.) Oh, and E&C actually wrestled together in some of their very first matches in the Indies.

Morrison's Moveset: To clarify: Having a flashy moveset is NOT a bad thing. If you have lots of great, flashy moves, that lots of people can take safely and look great, then that's extremely good. I just feel that Morrison tries a little too hard to be different and less on making what he does do look as great as it could be. I mean, it's all well and good to do everything differently, but if it starts to impact on how good the match looks, then that's bad. But by all means, you may not notice, but to my eye, he isn't that crisp a worker. But again, flashy moveset is fine. Provided it hits.

I'm fat!: I don't quite understand this sort of comment. I mean, yes, I'm fat. I am aware of this, I do buy clothes. I am obese. I'm also a Pro Wrestler who's good enough to be the company's champion, which in one fell swoop proves that I'm possibly better shape than you and have probably achieved more than you have in this life. But by all means, insult away. Just increasing the hit count.

And I don't mind if you don't care about my opinion. Hence why it's at the end, so you can skip over it if you want.

Your Turn, Smart Guy…



So, none last week. Week before, the question was:

Who am I? Part of a wrestling dynasty, I've wrestled all over the world, for several companies. I've had managers, and have managed. I've tried to bring companies down with stables, be they led by myself or led by others. A champion many times over, I sadly only hold one World Title to my name. A man who has borrowed a weapon off the writer of this column, and a guy who also idolised Tully Blanchard, I am the sometimes masked, recently un-retired and a man who's Wikipedia page has my work as a reference, I am who?

And the answer would indeed be Steve Corino, man of many nicknames, and borrower of my necklace to use as a chain. So there you go.

Who Are We? A Set of Tag Team Champions, we've both been World Champion (albeit with neither of us winning the same world title). We've fought each other in 2 (American) companies, we've fought more than we've teamed. One of us was the first holder of a title, and other the first man to win a certain title on PPV. We won the tag straps off the guys we lost them to in a match that was a catapult for a heel turn for one of us. We're both well versed in tag wrestling, one with one man partner, the other with a whole bunch. One of us is active and the other's not really retired, we are who?

Questions, Questions, Who's Got The Questions?



We start with a nice simple one from JLAJRC.

What were the ratings for the first and last episodes of WCW Nitro? Also, what were the ratings for the RAW's that were against those episodes?

Well then, let's have a look at the still very handy Monday Night Wars In A Spreadsheet!.

OK, this I don't quite understand, in that to my knowledge there was no Raw on the first episode of Nitro, yet the sheet says Nitro got 2.5 to Raw's 2.2 on the first Nitro. Regardless, the first time the two went head to head for real (the night "He beats the big guy with three superkicks") was the next week, September 11th, 1995, and that was Raw 2.5 V Nitro's 2.4.

As for the last Nitro, it scored a flat 3, and Raw 4.7. So a bit of improvement in the 6 years.

Empire Of Ownage forces me to outsource a bit.

Where and why did the tradition of throwing toilet paper into the ring when Jimmy Rave comes out start in Ring of Honor?

In cases like this, I bow to superior wisdom, and feature here the words of Ari Berenstein, 411's resident ROH Fan and Recapper.

Well, it started with a lone fan in late 2004 at the old Rex Plex in New Jersey. While other ROH wrestlers were sometimes receiving huge streamer receptions, this fan instead would throw in just one streamer at Rave (this was visual comedy because everyone else disliked him, so only getting one streamer was an insult and Rave took it as such). Then it became odd items, like pink bathroom loofahs. The real start of the toilet paper throwing would be a Four Corner Survival match between Rave, James Gibson (Jamie Noble), Alex Shelley and Azrieal from ROH Escape from New York, which took place July 9th, 2005 at the New Yorker Hotel. It was only one roll of toilet paper at the time, but hey, you have to start somewhere!

I then asked a follow up as to when ROH fans started throwing Streamers at all, but I stumped him, alas.

I'm not sure about that one. I seem to recall streamers catching on around the time Great Muta made his appearance during ROH Final Battle 2003, but it could have been before that, since there were several Japanese wrestlers like Ikuto Hidaka who made their way to ROH before then.

Thanks again to Ari. Go read his stuff.

411's Own Aaron Titan has some questions now as well as an opinion one later.

From one 411er to another, your column rules. A few questions from a huge wrestling fan:

1) You mentioned a tag team comprised of the Ultimate Warrior and Sting called Powerteam USA. This must have happened in WCW right? Any back story on that tag team forming and what they achieved storyline-wise? I'm really surprised Borden agreed to tag with Jim.


No no no. Sting and Ultimate Warrior broke into the business together. Powerteam USA was the brainchild of Red Bastien and Rick Bassman. They got 4 good looking bodybuilders who Red trained to become wrestlers, and the idea was to tour the territories with these guys as a roving draw, the big tough Powerteam USA. The 4 were Garland Donoho, Mark Miller, Steve Borden and Jim Hellwig. You might recognize those last two. Suffice to say, the idea didn't take off, and Garland and Mark quit soon after. But Steve and Jim kept at it, and became a tag team, going to Continental Wrestling Association (which is why Sting has such loyalty to the Jarretts, Jerry gave him his first break) where they were The Freedom Fighters (Justice and Flash. Flash is Sting.), and then to Bill Watts and UWF, where they were The Bladerunners (Rock and Sting). Then they split as Rock went to WCCW and became the Dingo Warrior, and their paths split, although they did have one last tag match together in WCW, but we don't talk about that.

But yeah, Sting and Warrior started off together, legit. So they probably win the award, moreso than the Hardyz. (Also, if you like speculative fiction, here's Ron Gamble's takes on if Sting went to WCCW and thus, logically, Warrior had stayed in UWF.)

2) What is Randy Savage up to these days. I know he's done some voice-over work, but has he attempted to get back into the wrestling business again at all?

Well, yes, Savage has made a couple of appearances back in Wrestling, in TNA.



This was in 2004, when he came in to fight off Jarrett, Hall and Nash with AJ Styles and Jeff Hardy, with a big 6 man match at Turning Point. And Savage did turn up, but only for the last few moments, pinning Jarrett.



But then Savage and Jarrett had a falling out, with Savage wanting to then win the World Title, Jarrett refused, so Savage left. As for now with Hogan… Who knows at what stage the Savage/Hogan relationship is at.

Suffice to say, apart from this short stint, Savage has done nothing in wrestling, except play a part in a weird co-incidence (on the day the Savage DVD set was released by WWE, a Slim Jim factory exploded). But he has done some voice over work, because let's face it, his voice is pretty unique.

But by most accounts, he's retired from the ring. Which is a shame, his TNA theme was kinda cool, in an over-feedback enriched way.



3) So Shane McMahon left the WWE at of January, 1, 2010. I don't know the exact title of his former position, but I know he was at the arenas at PPVs and the following day's RAW among other things. Who got his job when he left?

Shane McMahon was WWE's Executive Vice President, Global Media. To translate that out of business-ese, his job was to get the WWE out there in the world, get the international deals flowing, get WWE on TVs all over the planet. Which is why a lot of people are watching to see if he joins a MMA company. His on-screen use for any MMA company is questionable. But his talent behind the scenes, getting deals done? Now that's something MMA companies would love to get.

So, who is in the job now? Well, the WWE restructured, and that specific title no longer exists. However, Shane's job, as well as the WWE Canada President positon held by Carl DeMarco for 14 years before he quit right before Shane, the two jobs got merged into one position, "Executive Vice President, International". And that position is filled by Andrew Whitaker. He began with NBC, working on several TV shows as an NBC rep, then joined WWF in 1987, and for the past 20 years he worked his way up the WWF then WWE ladder, focusing on international markets. So he's experienced enough at the job that it's not a surprising promotion.

You owe it to yourself as a wrestling fan to see this at least once.


Josh wants to know who gets the credit.

So everyone knows that when Steve Austin came to the WWE he was called the Ring Master. Then after he debut I remember watching Superstars or something and Jim Ross would refer to him as being stone cold, not actually the name Stone Cold, just saying that The Ring Master was stone cold. Then one day they up and changed his name to Stone Cold Steve Austin. So whose idea was it to go from Ring Master to SCSA? Did they hear Jim Ross calling Ring Master stone cold and thought it had a good ring? Who gets credit for this idea?

Well, it's a mix of things here.

The Ringmaster gimmick wasn't working, and Austin was pushing for him to become a cold, uncaring heel type, basically what the original Stone Cold character became. The story that Mick Foley tells is that Austin submitted this idea, looking for a name, that he wanted to become cold, and got a list of names like "Chilly McFreeze" and "Ice Dagger". So Austin had this gimmick idea, but no name.

And the credit for the name goes to his second wife, Lady Blossom (real name Jeannie Clark). Being British, when her hubby was trying to think, she did what any good British gal would do. She made him a cup of tea. But Austin was distracted, as he thought about this new, non-sucky gimmick. And, gently pressing him as most wives do, she told him to drink his tea before it went ‘Stone Cold', which is a somewhat British expression.

So, the idea to change the gimmick was Austin's. The name was his wife. JR was probably just helping the name along.

Now, having insulted an entire country and a whole gender, I move onto HBK's Smile.

Hi, Matt. Thanks for answering my questions in the past. Here are a few new ones.

1) After all the hype for the Ric Flair-Kerry Von Erich match, why did the rematch where Flair regained the title take place 18 days later in Japan? I get that the NWA probably did not want Kerry as champ for long, but weren't they throwing away a huge gate by having it in Japan? Did the Japanese even know who Kerry was? And was it even the main event of the card it appeared on?


Well, let's get some video in here first. If you've never seen it, here's Flair losing the belt to Kerry.



And here's the end of the rematch, when Flair won the title back.



That rematch happened at an All Japan Pro Wrestling card in Yokosuka, Japan on May 24, 1984. I wasn't able to find the card listing, so I have no idea where on the bill the match came. Now, as to why the match happened… There's a whole lot of politics involved.

Now, the Von Erichs were well known in Japan, they often did tours there, David died in Japan after all. And that set the whole thing off.

See, David was a very good wrestler and, supposedly, in line to win the NWA World Title. Certainly he was being pushed there, there was a big angle with Mike Von Erich and Flair, where David got the right to a title match when Flair was unable to beat Mike in 10 minutes (had Flair won within 10 minutes, David would never have been able to ask for a shot). David was then able to name all the stips, and the match was set for April. And David was set to win the match, the title, and everything was set to be wine and roses.

And then David died.

After some time to mourn, the NWA and WCCW held a tribute show for David, May 6, and on the show, Flair defended his World title against Kerry Von Erich, being David's brother and the next biggest star. And in the feel good moment, Kerry won the match and the title, for his brother.

Then we get the politics.

See, while David's win had been planned, Kerry's was more of a spur of the moment thing, the family's been hit, Fritz is devastated, give them the title to make up for it. Thus, Kerry wasn't in the plans. Flair was building up to his big match with Ricky Steamboat in New Jersey at the end of the month. So Flair had to have the belt back by then.

And Kerry wasn't the most dependable person. Flair, in his book, discusses how he had to carry a out of it Kerry to a full hour due to the stipulations for the match, where had he just gone home, the entire feud between the two regions would be over, so he was forced to wrestle himself and a stiff board, for all intents and purposes, for an hour. So Kerry wasn't trusted, and Ric needed the belt back.

So why Japan? That was Fritz demand, apparently. With the title win occurring in Japan, Kerry didn't have to lose on home ground. Hell, not even in America! WCCW then spun it, by talking about how Flair must have paid the ref off, it was a giant conspiracy to screw Kerry out of the title. You can't trust them Japanese, heck, maybe they had something to do with David as well! And so forth.

2) I've seen it alleged that Chris Benoit was having an affair with a Diva at the time of 6/24/07. Any truth to that?

That's it for now. Thanks.


Well, it's true that it was rumoured. According to some media reports, Nancy suspected Chris was having an affair with a Diva, which led to tension. For some reason, Victoria was at some point linked to the story as the Diva in question, which she very quickly and very vehemently denied.

As for if it's the truth, I've not seen anyone else claim that there was anyone, and if there was someone, by now, someone would have sold some part of that story to someone.

Wait…

No, I don't think there was an affair, if there was, it would have come to light. But I'm not about to start digging, thank you.

Bradley asks for something to be spelled out.

Matt,

Great column buddy! I learn something new every time I read it. My brother and I are both huge fans of wrestling history, both inside and outside the ring. We were wondering what some of the most blatant political moves within wrestling have been, and the reasons behind them. For instance, in last week's column you mentioned HBK vetoing a Vader championship win at SummerSlam '96, for whatever *cough* reasons. Spell it, and others, out for me man.

Thanks, and keep up the good work.


Well, practically every decision is political on some level. Politics is one of those aspects of the business that everyone decries and says they hate, but everyone plays it on some level.

Now, Vader V Shawn is fairly easy, although like all such stories it's fuzzy and based on questionable testimonies.

The traditional line is that Vader was set to win the WWF Title at Summerslam, but Shawn, being a whiny little egotistical bitch, refused, and we ended up with what we got, with Vader kinda looking silly. The pro-Shawn people will point to their 2 months of house shows, and that clearly that must not have drawn and thus they just chose not to put the belt on Vader. Regardless, the original plan, by most accounts, was for Shawn to lose the belt to Vader, Vader loses it to Bret, then Vader beats Bret and then Shawn wins it back off Vader, thus giving Shawn and Bret a run without having to face each other. But the WWF didn't go that route, with Sid becoming the guy to beat and then lose to Shawn, skipping Bret all together.

However, that was going to be Vader still, Vader was to be the champ, but a badly timed injury meant Sid got the nod instead.

So that's the story of Shawn V Vader.

As for other political moves, well… The overselling from last week.

Then there's Bash At The Beach 2000.




OK, this one's complicated, so bear with me.

OK, Hogan has Creative Control, if he wants it, right? If he decides to call the shots, he can, Turner gave him that right. So, in the lead up to Bash At The Beach, and is told that he's losing to Jeff Jarrett by DQ (which he's not against, either part) and then that's it. Russo ain't using him no more.

Hogan doesn't like that, and thus pulls an audible, and demands changes, he demands to win the title, on the basis that Russo's an idiot and he has to stick around since he's Hulk Hogan. Eric Bischoff, the guy who was supposed to balance out Russo and be the negotiator, wasn't there since his father had just recently passed away.

So, day of the show, Bischoff turns up about an hour before the start of the show, meets with Hogan. They agree that Russo's an idiot, and then lay out to Russo how the match will go, since, with Hogan's Creative Control clause, he can do this and Russo can't do a damm thing.

Since WCW was so shoot-work twisty at this point, Hogan would, in character, invoke his Creative Control clause. Jarrett, disgusted with this, would lay down. Hogan, equally disgusted, would pin Jarrett to win the title. He'd then ‘retire', in character, in anger and disgust at how he was being treated. WCW would then hold a tournament to crown a new champion. The finals would be two heels (Jarrett and Steiner probably), but right before the match starts, Hulk Hogan returns, saying that since he was never beat, he's still the champ, he enters the match, wins, and Hulkamania is reborn and everyone is happy and we all move on.

Russo, because he had to, agrees. But, because he didn't want to do this, he spins it, and tells Hogan and Bischoff that if they do this, it has to look like a shoot shoot, not a worked shoot. And they have to act like it, as soon as Hogan wins, he and Bischoff have to tear out of the building in disgust. Hogan and Bischoff, thinking Russo has seen the light, agree.

So, the first video there happens, goes down according to Hogan's plan. He even swore, just to put over how mad he was.

And then, after Hogan and Bischoff left… Russo shot. That entire promo was him violating Hogan's Creative Control, violating Hogan's "No mention the baldness" clause, and basically causing a massive lawsuit costing AOL/Time-Warner millions. Clearly Russo's finest hour.

I'm fairly sure that's the biggest political kerfuffle on camera. Any others people want explained?

My Damm Opinion



411's Own Aaron Titan is back.

Who do you feel will be the next NEW, FIRST TIME WWE or World Heavywight Champion (someone who hasn't been a major world champion before). If I had to guess right now, I'd go with Christian (though he was TNA/NWA Champion i the past I suppose) since he's my pick to win MITB at WM26 and cash in on a champion Edge. Since Christian was a former world champ in another company, my technical pick for this question is The Miz. I honestly don't see Morrison getting the strap anytime soon given the exact reasons you listed last week, Kofi's not quite there yet, and McIntyre, DiBiase, and others aren't either. What are your thoughts?

The overall answer to that question can be seen below, when I book how I think he'll win it. But for a name that is 100% Never World Champ before, I don't think Miz will because he's too useful in the midcard, and Morrison no for reasons I've listed earlier. I think Kofi will win the July MITB (he should be rebuilt by then), and then cash it in for a win at the November PPV/TLC. Although I'm not sure how long that reign will last.

Larry (not Bossman Larry, another Larry) is thinking conspiracy.

Hey Matt.

One question: could Vince McMahon once again screw Bret Hart at Wrestlemania XXVI? With an ending similar to the one at Survivor Series? Would Bret Hart have some sort of protection in his contract against a similar ending to their match? I just have a bad feeling about this...

THX. Love the column.


Could Vince McMahon re-screw Bret? Well, yes, he's the boss, he could if he really wanted to. But if he did, he'd have a major riot in the locker room, moreso than last time because there would be no possible justification for it, and he'd be sued the second Bret's lawyer got to a phone. I'm fairly sure that there is something akin to the ‘Reasonable Creative Control' clause that caused all the problems last time to avoid the possibility of a second screw job.

Given all the hard work WWE has done to get the match to happen, with Bret and Shawn and Lloyd's of London and such, I refuse to believe that Vince is so egotistical to go through all that just to re-screw Bret.

Continuing with that theme, it's Bryan!

In Vince McMahon's attempt to goad Bret Hart into having a match with him, do you think bringing up Owen's name in attempt to get heat would make the match bigger or just disgust people to where they don't even care to watch?

The second one. Bringing up Owen would just make the whole thing icky and piss people off the wrong way. Plus Owen's widow would almost certainly go ballistic should they bring it up, given how adamant she's been so far about Owen and the WWE. But yeah, Owen being brought in would be icky. And no-one's exactly missing his prescience in this feud.

(And if you can fill in a punchline to that last sentence, you're a sick sick person who's in on the ‘joke'. And if you have no idea what I'm talking about, well done. Have an Irish Tara.)

and second, would the WWE or TNA make money by allowing people to buy PPV in advance, 3, 6 or even 12 months at once for a sort of bulk discount. Like 12 ppv's for the price of 10 or something. Would that have worked during the 1990's when WCW and ECW ran a PPV every month and people had more money?

It's a nice idea, but too hard to run, given that you'd have to cut deals with every PPV carrier, and that's a whole lot of negotiation. Maybe if a wrestling company only ran on one carrier (like ECW did at first) then it might be viable, or your online PPV feeds, but it's too complicated (if someone moves, do they carry over the purchase?) to work at the moment. Money isn't so much the issue (discounts are good!), just that it's hideously complicated.

Darren from New Jersey wants my thoughts on two people post WM.

1. Do you think Christian will ever win the WWE title or World Heavyweight championship? I think Christian is awesome. He is a solid worker, charismatic, and the crowd loves him, but Vince seems like he'll never give him that push. I'd love to see Christian win MITB this year, but I doubt he will, if Kofi gets in, he will definitely win.... Will Christian ever get the push to the top? I guess this is more an opinion than a question. Good work with the column, I've never wrote you before but I read it every week. Also, what are your thoughts on HBK? Is he done after Mania? I figured they would give him the belt one more time before he retired.

Well, I'll end on this since it's controversial in a good way.

I think Christian will walk out of Wrestlemania as World Champion, and I am picking Shawn to break the Streak.

As far as Christian goes, my thinking is in lots of small, logical steps. July has a PPV called Money In The Bank. Thus, logically, there will be a MITB match on that show. Ergo, Wrestlemania's MITB will probably be used up before then. With one in July, you could, in fact, blow MITB that night. Next month, at the usual ‘Backlash' spot, it's now Extreme Rules. So a Wrestlemania rematch, to be great, would have people used to such matches. Now, Edge, while doing quite well, is not quite the same guy as he left. Plus the face thing isn't totally working out for him. So, perhaps, they might have Jericho win. But you can't have Jericho walk out with the belt, if Shawn's winning. So, who's in MITB, has experience with extreme matches, and is someone Jericho and Edge trust, like, and would be willing to help elevate?

Christian Cage, come on down!

So, by my logic, Christian leaves WM with big gold belt in hand. And maybe loses it back to Jericho or to a heel Edge next month if he doesn't work out.

As for HBK… I'm not sure Taker will last another year. Plus, Shawn's not exactly a heel at the moment. He's just barely this side of the line. And it's No Holds Barred.

And so, what if Shawn just snapped? I mean, he hits a dozen superkicks. Then a few Tombstones. And a Pedigree. Then he creates the Crucifix Pillmanisation, when he puts a chair on each arm, leg and neck, and then stomps on all of them for a few minutes. Then he sets Taker on fire. Then drops a nuclear bomb. Then, hell, locks in the Christian Crossface for the KO, Ref's Decision finish.

Shawn Michaels is now your biggest heel of the last 100 years. He can rule Raw for a year, then get retired next year by Cena.

But if he does lose at WM? He'll be gone for a while, then someone will call himself the new Showstopper, or will hunt him down and demand he fight him, or Taker will find him to stand by his side against Jericho and Edge or something. He'll be back.

But how about you guys? You think I'm crazy or what?


Post Comment (70)  |  Email Mathew Sforcina  |  View Mathew Sforcina's 411 Profile

  Send To Friend  |    Stumble It!  |    Digg It!  | 



Please add your comment below.
If you are registered, you can login and post under your registered name. If not, you can post as a guest or register.

* Please note that 411 moderates all comments. Your comment will show up on the site after it has been approved by an editor.
 
Name : 
Comment : 
Remaining Characters : 
2800
 

Comments (70)

 
How can people still defend TNA and the 'new regime' after the .8?

What will the excuse be in May? June? If you keep blaming what is going on with RAW on the low ratings, you will never go anywhere.....


Posted By: Bill Cartwright (Guest)  on March 16, 2010 at 11:07 PM

 
 
Every report in the world points to HBK taking time off and not being around much, if at all, after Mania.

Not only that, but anyone with half a brain knows HBK is not ending the streak. Undertaker is winning the match.


Posted By: Hindu Friend (Guest)  on March 16, 2010 at 11:10 PM

 
 
I love every year how a select few try to convince others (and themselves) that Taker will lose come Mania.

Posted By: Gregson (Guest)  on March 16, 2010 at 11:11 PM

 
 
Don't know if I agree about the Shawn/Undertaker stuff.

But, I agree that Christian is the best choice to win MITB. With another MITB match coming (too) soon, this match needs to go to the established star.

With Christian's history with both Edge and Jericho, it makes too much sense for him to win and cash it in soon. WM would be great timing.

It makes sense, which means it probably won't happen and they'll give it to Dolph or something to 'swerve' me.


Posted By: Heyyo (Guest)  on March 16, 2010 at 11:19 PM

 
 
A more recent example of someone using power to prevent a title run is Mysterio when he refused to give the title to Ziggler, then got suspended and pretty much killed Ziggler's momentum for the time being by making him wait so long, then not making him champ.

Posted By: SHADE (Guest)  on March 16, 2010 at 11:21 PM

 
 
Win or lose, Shawn's not done. We still need a feud between him and Punk and/or him and HHH (who will be the one to retire him if not Cena).

Posted By: Guest#1102 (Guest)  on March 16, 2010 at 11:22 PM

 
 
Name: Massive Matt
Finisher: Massive Splash

This amuses me and I don't know why.


Posted By: Blanky (Guest)  on March 16, 2010 at 11:36 PM

 
 
you are Mick Foley & Terry Funk

Posted By: stat geek (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 12:02 AM

 
 
" I'm fat. I am aware of this, I do buy clothes. I am obese. I'm also a Pro Wrestler"

Dude, let Vince McMahon know about you! He let fucking Mabel win KOTR and main event against the champion (who was another tall guy, Diesel), not to mention a host of other tall fat guys (Bundy, One Man Gang, Earthquake, Big John Studd, Big Show, Mark Henry etc.), I'm sure he would at least give you a try. He loves the kind of build you have! I'm totally seriouslah!


Posted By: Guest#1206 (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 12:24 AM

 
 
I got a good laugh at WARRIOR prancing at the background in that video (maybe he just wanted to get closer to Beefcake's hairy chest and pink tights?)! Too bad they didn't give him a single segment to share some of his thoughts like DiBiase, Hogan and Koko got. Now THAT would be a sight!

Posted By: Sarcastro (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 12:36 AM

 
 
I'm going with Foley and Funk.

Posted By: ManSpice (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 12:42 AM

 
 
"If You Only Knew"

Oh My God......
More please!


Posted By: Paul (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 12:49 AM

 
 
Now that you mention the Blade Runners, they seem a perfect fit to last week's tag team question ...

Posted By: Guest#3474 (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 12:51 AM

 
 
You are ... STRIKE FORCE!!!

No? Really? No?

My bad.


Posted By: Jump to Conclusions (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 12:54 AM

 
 
I'm going with Foley and Funk.

Posted By: ManSpice (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 12:55 AM

 
 
Shawn Michaels won't break the streak. I'm predicting that he superkicks Taker, but before he can get the pin, Triple H runs down and takes him out. Trips becomes a super-heel again and Taker is disgusted by this turn of events, leading to an obvious match at Extreme Rules. Michaels comes back at the Rumble to cost Triple H a shot at Mania XXVII, and set up a final match for Michaels next year.

Posted By: Jason (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 01:00 AM

 
 
"Regardless, the original plan, by most accounts, was for Shawn to lose the belt to Vader, Vader loses it to Bret, then Vader beats Bret and then Shawn wins it back off Vader, thus giving Shawn and Bret a run without having to face each other."



Where exactly do you get your information? Particularly that.


Posted By: S Dot (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 01:07 AM

 
 
I am in love with your fantasy booking. I sincerly hope that happens. HBK NEEDS to turn heel.

Posted By: Banz (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 01:15 AM

 
 
I'm going with Foley and Funk.

Posted By: ManSpice (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 01:23 AM

 
 
Damn that was a hard trivia question, but I think I got it...Mick Foley & Terry Funk

Who Are We? A Set of Tag Team Champions, we've both been World Champion (albeit with neither of us winning the same world title).
Funk was NWA Champion and Foley was WWF and TNA Champion...

We've fought each other in 2 (American) companies, we've fought more than we've teamed.
Fought in ECW and WWF...

One of us was the first holder of a title, and other the first man to win a certain title on PPV.
Foley was first WWF Hardcore Champion; Funk was the first guy to win ECW Championship on PPV...

We won the tag straps off the guys we lost them to in a match that was a catapult for a heel turn for one of us.
They lost the belts back to the New Age Outlaws, which led to Foley turning into Corporate Dude Love...

We're both well versed in tag wrestling, one with one man partner, the other with a whole bunch.
Funk is best associated with his brother...Foley with Rock, Snow, Kane, etc.

One of us is active and the other's not really retired, we are who?
Foley is very active in TNA and Funk will never retire...


Posted By: Mark (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 01:24 AM

 
 
How can people still defend TNA and the 'new regime' after the .8?

What will the excuse be in May? June? If you keep blaming what is going on with RAW on the low ratings, you will never go anywhere.....

Posted By: Bill Cartwright (Guest) on March 16, 2010 at 11:07 PM

As a TNA viewer, my answer is: because I never cared about ratings and never will. That's not my job.


Posted By: poffo316 (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 01:24 AM

 
 
"I'm also a Pro Wrestler who's good enough to be the company's champion, which in one fell swoop proves that I'm possibly better shape than you and have probably achieved more than you have in this life."

Of course. Who wouldn't want to be an ugly, lumpy, make believe champion of a no-name wrestling organization?


Posted By: Bob (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 01:42 AM

 
 
hbk needs to turn heel before he retires...he also needs to win the belt...then during his retirement match at mania next year drop it to someone deserving....hmmm....daniel bryan? too early...anyway..

Posted By: deeno (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 02:17 AM

 
 
What exactly is this "He beats the big guy with three superkicks" remark? A Bischoff launched insult aimed at Michaels?

Posted By: Guest#3002 (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 02:50 AM

 
 
Your prediction re: Christian/Edge/Jericho and Taker/Shawn match mine perfectly. I don't think you're crazy at all.

With Christian/Jericho/Edge, aside from a brief mention by Christian himself, all references to their shared history have been dropped in hopes that the viewer will think the writers have forgotten about it.

What they're using here is a trope called "The Brick Joke." (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/BrickJoke)

At least if they're smart they are.

With Taker/HBK it seems a little more straightforward. Shawn cheats to win and turns heel. Been coming for ages.


Posted By: Billzilla (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 04:09 AM

 
 
"Shawn Michaels won't break the streak. I'm predicting that he superkicks Taker, but before he can get the pin, Triple H runs down and takes him out. Trips becomes a super-heel again and Taker is disgusted by this turn of events, leading to an obvious match at Extreme Rules. Michaels comes back at the Rumble to cost Triple H a shot at Mania XXVII, and set up a final match for Michaels next year."

This.
I'd probably have HBK return sooner, and for longer, but basically this.

That way, we'd get a payoff for all the DX dissention over the last couple of months.

The thing to remember is HBKs career can be reinstated (right Savage), but the Streak cannot.


Posted By: Quimby (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 04:22 AM

 
 
I think the next MitB winner loses their challenge. Hopefully it will be used to set up a larger storyline, but so far every winner of the match held gold when cashing in.

I think they brought back Undertaker too early, he was recovering from surgery. Now, at this point in their careers HKB and Undertaker have their summer sabbaticals.
This means that after Wrestlemania, each takes summer off. Now as long as Undertaker is a part time performer, he will have the Streak. No point in ending it while he is semi-active. So he wins, heals up, comes back when it the leaves turn colors.

HBK loses because of HHH interference. Remember HHH brought back HBK to help him with Legacy. HBK was always face in peril or the one to get pinned (HHH certainly didn't get pinned or look weak). HBK has been losing as he was distracted and obsessed.
So HHH interferes, "I brought you back to the (WWE) universe, and I'm damn sure taking you out, you old failure".
Done, HBK gets his summer off with his wife and kids. HHH has a heel turn. Groundwork is laid for a future series of matches.

Since this 'retirement' is kayfabe (as all wrestling retirements are), HBK can be brought back after school starts. Maybe Cena needs help. Or Vince and HHH have a family argument, 'H runs wild, and Vince brings back the one man left who can stop him. Kofi brings in a mentor to help him get over the top into the main event.
Whatever. It can be easily done. No reason to talk as if it was meant to be a final retirement.


Posted By: Guest#3192 (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 04:36 AM

 
 
Sky TV in the UK occasionally does 3 for 2 PPVS. The last few years they’ve done it with Survivor Series and the two “B” PPVs either side (Armageddon in December, not sure about October, No Mercy?). Presumably they did this because they were traditionally low buyrates in the UK, being in the run up to Christmas and all.

Posted By: Mentalist (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 05:54 AM

 
 
I would of thought being from parra would have more stigma attached to it than a weight problem, although you did beat Iron Jay and he's one bad MattitudeFollower

Posted By: turoklobster (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 06:22 AM

 
 
If memory serves me right, I believe that when Sting and Warrior first popped up in Memphis, they were still called Powerteam USA and it was just the two of them. Then, the very next week, they were The Freedom Fighters.

Posted By: Guest#6176 (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 06:40 AM

 
 
With no DQ or Countouts at WM, am I the only one seeing Triple H pedigreeing Shawn to cost him his career, turning heel, but using the excuse that Shawn had screwed him and their friendship for months. Then Shawn returns at Summerslam or next years WM for a final match with Hunter.

Posted By: DanBklyn510 (Registered)  on March 17, 2010 at 07:14 AM

 
 
" that I'm possibly better shape than you and have probably achieved more than you have in this life."

No you are not in better shape than I am. And you definitely achieved more in the minor league pro wrestling circuit than I ever have or will.. that is about all though.


Posted By: Guest#2159 (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 07:21 AM

 
 
Is it me or are some of these questions recycled from endless previous columns? I mean I swear the 'Stone Cold', 'Sting/Warrior' questions have popped up on every wrestling site for the last 10 years. Surely people would have enough resources to find out this stuff by themselves as their is countless information (wikipedia!) about it?

Shawn won't be ending the streak, HHH I believe will screw him over and turn heel... leading down the line (Nx WM?) to him coimng out of 'retirement'.

Business wise it makes perfect sense for Cena to be the guy to end the streak and do a MEGA heel turn ala Hogan 96'. Hell let Cena go the full hog and bring back a new version of the nWo with edgier programming.


Posted By: Andrew Barbarash (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 07:29 AM

 
 
Bret Hart will cost HBK his career at Wrestlemania.

Posted By: guest (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 08:03 AM

 
 
as for tna,i am not a wwe mark. i just like quality wrestling and good storylines. which tna had. then russo was bought in. a couple years later, now hogan and bischoff are running the show.

the move to go up against ANY of the wwe shows, let alone raw, reeks of stupidity.


Posted By: rey (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 08:16 AM

 
 
In the UK and Ireland, all WWE PPV's are on Sky, some free to air and some on box office.

For the last few years they have done a deal where you can get 3 for the price of 2 on I think Survivor Series, Hell In a Cell and Braggin Rights.


Posted By: Dave (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 08:16 AM

 
 
I have been thinking a LOT about Christian lately. I, uh, mean I have been thinking about him winning the belt at Mania. That would be awesome, it is time.

Another thing I have been thinking about is how bad TNA has been for the last, well, forever. It is not all Hogan's fault, though he is not off the hook, but it has been bad for a while. If anyone else feels the same way contact them and tell them what you think. Tell them that the ratings suck because the show is no good.

info@tnawrestling.com


Posted By: Squid Vicious (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 08:44 AM

 
 
QUESTION FOR ASK 411

Sadly, knowing the popularity of this column (and rightly so, I never missi it.) the relevance of this question could well fade following mania, but it is still worth an ask anyway.

The Undertakers Streak (which always makes me think of skid-marks in his tights for some reason) got me thinking. I know André the Giant went undefeated (kayfabe?) for a very long time, Hulk Hogan in the 80's during his first WWF title run a similar thing, Also Bruno Samartino, THE longest WWF champion (for a single reign) on the books.

This makes me wonder about winning streaks (or undefeated streaks) in general. Who would be the top 5/10 longest winning streaks in the buisness ever?

Also, one for the opinion. As this was written pre-mania and could well not see the column untill post-mania I don't have the foresight of the HBK/Taker match result, but having read a number of 411 colums there seems to be a mood that if the streak is to end, it shoudl be HBK, Cena or Orton who ends it. Now let's assume that HBK IS successful and ends the streak. You would be left with Shawn Michaels.. The man who has done all there is to do in the buisness. We all know Shawn is going to be winding down soon(ish) anyway. so would it not make sense for WWE to place Shawn in some sort of Guru status? Perhapse forming his own stable to mentor up and comers? There will never be another HBK but I can see no better use for him than to help elevate guy who are new into the buisness and need their big break. Maybe an on-air version of the Shawn Michaels Wrestling Academy?


Posted By: Chris Phoenix (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 09:35 AM

 
 
I've been expecting over the last couple weeks for Shawn to be crazy/obsessive about Taker with HHH trying to bring him back to reality.

In the match at Wrestlemania, Shawn gets beaten up bad but won't stay down. He'd rather die than lose. HHH comes ringside, telling Shawn to stop before it too late. Shawn keeps going back for more punishment.

Finally HHH takes out Shawn to finish the match. "For his own good" like he did to Flair after he won the IC title a few years back.

Instant DX explodes feud.

But there has been little between HHH and Shawn lately so it seems unlikely.


Posted By: Guest#3016 (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 09:40 AM

 
 
How can people still defend TNA and the 'new regime' after the .8?

What will the excuse be in May? June? If you keep blaming what is going on with RAW on the low ratings, you will never go anywhere.....

Posted By: Bill Cartwright (Guest) on March 16, 2010 at 11:07 PM

2 issues with this.

1. Why didin't TNA aim for the slightly easier to conquer Smackdown before going to monday nights?

2. Why do people expect the quick result? Hog-off is going to need at LEAST 6 months to get things ironed out and runing smoothly and even then we probably wont see the results for a year (assuming of course that they DO manage to fix TNA)


Posted By: Chris_Phoenix (Registered)  on March 17, 2010 at 09:57 AM

 
 
Being the champion of a wrestling company no one has heard of means you have accomplished more than all of your readers? Right...because you know what every reader has done and has accomplished.

Posted By: Guest#6510 (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 10:38 AM

 
 
One simple question:

Where is Finlay? It seems like he just disappeared from TV with no explanation. Is he hurt? Is he taking time off? If he's retiring I'd hope they would actually make a little noise about it.


Posted By: Jason Douglas (Registered)  on March 17, 2010 at 10:40 AM

 
 
I've never bought Austin's story about his moniker. I think it's far more likely that Vince, Steve, et alia ripped off the Brian Bosworth movie Stone Cold. Austin's character looked vaguely biker-ish and the film came out shortly before the character debuted.

Posted By: Iron Knee (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 10:43 AM

 
 
SCSA gimmick probably wouldn't have exploded had he not grabbed the mic at KOTR and said "You stand there thumping your bible. You talk about your psalms. You talk about your John 3:16. Well Austin 3:16 says I just whipped your @ss!"
Without that, and the gazillions of Tshirts that sold. I'm not sure how far SCSA would have gone.
------------------------
And as far as Nancy thinking there was an affair. She probably just noticed that he'd started acting strange. And her explanation would have been an affair.
The real explanation, that he'd gone batsh!t insane probably never crossed her mind. Until the end.
May she and her child RIP.


Posted By: demOcratic (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 11:33 AM

 
 
Michaels will win but with help from HHH. Thus turning HHH and Michaels heel. The reunion of DX as heels are born. People think DX is a failure but they never reunited as heels. It will work as HHH can still be booed but if Michaels can be the HHH of 97-98 then he can get just as much heat as HHH.

Posted By: Guest#8849 (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 11:47 AM

 
 
I like the idea of Shawn going batshit crazy but I don't think Shawn would. The last two times he's gone "heel" it's only been by default ("I had to know" against Hogan and the light to Taker's always-popular darkness) so seeing him go full-bore doesn't seem likely. I'd love to see it but I'm not holding my breath.

I also hope to see Christian win MITB and cash in that night. Just to see Edge close WrestleMania, Big Gold Belt in hand, only to be interrupted by "Go!" would make me cream my pants. Then you've got a top heel on SmackDown in Christian (hopefully with the return of his badass Waterproof Blonde theme) to talk about how Edge was supposedly the star of the team but while Edge was getting injured and sleeping with fat chicks HE was off decimating whole companies and becoming the Single Greatest Canadian Champion Ever. And with that line you've got a ready-made feud with both Edge and Jericho.

And while I see the second one happening, I don't see the first. Michaels ain't beating Taker, and it's likely to end on Hunterference to set up Michaels return at, say, SummerFest. It's the logical payoff to the DX dissension, and would fit in with Hunter's emotional state if he loses earlier in the night to Sheamus only to see his supposed best friend having the match of his career and about to accomplish what no one, not even he, The Game himself, could do. Trips can then defend his position for months until HBKs inevitable return, likely during a WWE Championship match just to really fuck with him.

"What exactly is this "He beats the big guy with three superkicks" remark? A Bischoff launched insult aimed at Michaels?"

When Nitro first started and was live ever week Raw would tape a months worth of shows in one night, the Monday after a PPV. So the line above is in reference to that night's Raw main event of Michaels going over Sid via three superkicks.


Posted By: neverAcquiesce (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 11:53 AM

 
 
I would mark big time if HHH cost HBK the match because HHH is due a heel run.

Also Christian is a must to win MITB, because the others arnt ready for a world title run yet.


Posted By: jbardo (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 12:01 PM

 
 
"So why Japan? That was Fritz demand, apparently. With the title win occurring in Japan, Kerry didn't have to lose on home ground. Hell, not even in America! WCCW then spun it, by talking about how Flair must have paid the ref off, it was a giant conspiracy to screw Kerry out of the title. You can't trust them Japanese, heck, maybe they had something to do with David as well! And so forth."

Wow. And people clown on Bret for not wanting to lose in Canada.


Posted By: Guest#9277 (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 12:17 PM

 
 
Kofi wins, cashes in on Batista after he retains by pinning Cena. Fans go home happy and we don't get another Cenamania.

Posted By: S.O.S. something some-thing! (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 12:32 PM

 
 
I'm also a Pro Wrestler who's good enough to be the company's champion, which in one fell swoop proves that I'm possibly better shape than you and have probably achieved more than you have in this life. ______________________________________

I don't know about anyone else, but I want nothing more in life than to be a 300 pound fatass who makes tens of dollars wrestling in his underwear for a company no one's ever heard of.


Posted By: Sam (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 01:27 PM

 
 
It's been years since I saw that "If You Only Knew" video. Thank you for that sir. I always cracked up at Killer Khan in the background mouthing the words to the song when clearly English is not his first (second or third for that matter) language. Keep up the brilliant work!!!

Posted By: Cory (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 02:17 PM

 
 
Matt, can you explain why Jericho can't leave WM with the belt if Shawn is beating Taker? I'm not sure I see the connection there.

Posted By: Matt (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 03:31 PM

 
 
"If You Only Knew"...ahh, memories. Cheesy though they may be. I still kind of mark out seeing all those WWF wrestlers I grew up with.

Posted By: Guest#1373 (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 05:54 PM

 
 
Did you see mein the video? I was there! I was!! Me and what's his name; that guy I carried! I wrote that song, you know. Hart and Ware were just lip syncing to my voice too.

Posted By: Paul Roma (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 05:57 PM

 
 
Shawn can't beat Taker, so Triple H comes down and does a supreme beatdown on Taker and together they end the streak. Shawn is upset and he and HHH fued.

or...

Undertakers other brother Phinneas Godwin (the retarded one) comes out and gives him the slop drop and Michaels picks up the win.


Posted By: Derek (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 06:08 PM

 
 
"I mean, yes, I'm fat. I am aware of this, I do buy clothes. I am obese. I'm also a Pro Wrestler who's good enough to be the company's champion..."

Dude, you champ? Sweet. Congrats


Posted By: Comment Board Poster (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 06:26 PM

 
 
Great Khali will never make the HOF. He's a former champ, if you recall.

Posted By: Bleh (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 07:00 PM

 
 
I am done if Triple H interferes either way in what should be an ultimate classic and after what happened last year SHOULD end the show.

Posted By: RADTKE (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 08:58 PM

 
 
Great Khali will never make the HOF. He's a former champ, if you recall.

Posted By: Bleh (Guest) on March 17, 2010 at 07:00 PM

He said WWF chammpions. The only guys who held the belt when it was known as that that aren't HOF are:

Backlund,Savage, Warrior,Undertaker, Yokozunza, Nash, HBK, Sid, Kane, Rock, Foley,HHH, Vince, Angle, and Jericho.

And yeah, if this HOF runs long enough they'll all get in.


Posted By: Guest#8930 (Guest)  on March 17, 2010 at 11:11 PM

 
 
SOMEONE HELP, i swear i read about the RUSSO Shoot along time ago on ask 411, before u were around. and they said it was a work. you said it was real and broke the creative control that hogan had, the bald thing. Anyways was it a work or not, because if u can show there was a lawsuit then it was a shoot.

Posted By: fjuice02 (Guest)  on March 18, 2010 at 03:32 AM

 
 
"I am obese. I'm also a Pro Wrestler who's good enough to be the company's champion, which in one fell swoop proves that I'm possibly better shape than you and have probably achieved more than you have in this life. But by all means, insult away. Just increasing the hit count."

How can you think what you do compares to sitting in a basement and trolling a wrestling website? I mean, the size is probably comparable...


Posted By: G-Walla (Guest)  on March 18, 2010 at 04:23 AM

 
 
"And so, what if Shawn just snapped? I mean, he hits a dozen superkicks. Then a few Tombstones. And a Pedigree. Then he creates the Crucifix Pillmanisation, when he puts a chair on each arm, leg and neck, and then stomps on all of them for a few minutes. Then he sets Taker on fire. Then drops a nuclear bomb. Then, hell, locks in the Christian Crossface for the KO, Ref's Decision finish.

Shawn Michaels is now your biggest heel of the last 100 years."

How Sforcina isn't on the WWE creative team is beyond me.


Posted By: Book It Now! (Guest)  on March 18, 2010 at 05:20 AM

 
 
I don't know which scenario is crazier, the streak ending or chrisitan leaving WM as champ. Seriously, i don't undersatnd how so many otherwise intelligent IWC pundits are putting forth the notion that Christian leaves as champ. MITB winner? Sure, that's plausible. But leaving the whole shebang with one of the big gold belts?? Are you fucking kidding me???

Posted By: get a clue (Guest)  on March 18, 2010 at 06:06 AM

 
 
1) Prior to Survivor Series 2009, were there other triple threat matches where all 3 wrestlers were faces?
2) Raw Roulette - The first one that Eric Bischoff did where Kane retained the tag titles in a TLC match. Were the match types that pre-determined or was it real?


Posted By: Morne (Guest)  on March 18, 2010 at 10:19 AM

 
 
Since asking the same question over and over again seems to work for "Chungles":

How has Michael Cole become the longest continuously employed announcer on the WWF/WWE roster despite not having improved a lick over the years, having no legit passion for the business, and being generally disliked by most fans (online and otherwise)?

Is it his clean cut looks? Is it his legitimate journalism background? Does he have something to hold over managements' collective heads that guarantees him a job seemingly for life? Or is he simply the perennial "yes man" that Vince adores?


Posted By: Brad B (Guest)  on March 18, 2010 at 12:29 PM

 
 
Since asking the same question over and over again seems to work for "Chungles":

How has Michael Cole become the longest continuously employed announcer on the WWF/WWE roster despite not having improved a lick over the years, having no legit passion for the business, and being generally disliked by most fans (online and otherwise)?

Is it his clean cut looks? Is it his legitimate journalism background? Does he have something to hold over managements' collective heads that guarantees him a job seemingly for life? Or is he simply the perennial "yes man" that Vince adores?


Posted By: Brad B (Guest)  on March 18, 2010 at 12:29 PM

 
 
I don't know about anyone else, but I want nothing more in life than to be a 300 pound fatass who makes tens of dollars wrestling in his underwear for a company no one's ever heard of.

Posted By: Sam (Guest) on March 17, 2010 at 01:27 PM


LOL!!!


Posted By: hungover (Guest)  on March 18, 2010 at 03:03 PM

 
 
I've never bought Austin's story about his moniker. I think it's far more likely that Vince, Steve, et alia ripped off the Brian Bosworth movie Stone Cold. Austin's character looked vaguely biker-ish and the film came out shortly before the character debuted.

Posted By: Iron Knee (Guest) on March 17, 2010 at 10:43 AM

The movie "Stone Cold" came out in 1991, so if you consider 5 years to be "shortly"?


Posted By: Guest#6206 (Guest)  on March 18, 2010 at 05:10 PM

 
 
If HBK beats Taker at WM then WWE absolutely has no idea what they are doing. Once you build The Streak up this much, it either never gets broken or gets broken by a young star that will benefit from it. I'd rather see Cena end the streak before HBK, at least it will build Cena up and mean something in a couple years. HBK winning would ruin the streak and accomplish nothing.

Posted By: 420 (Guest)  on March 19, 2010 at 06:06 PM

 
 
One simple question:

Where is Finlay? It seems like he just disappeared from TV with no explanation. Is he hurt? Is he taking time off? If he's retiring I'd hope they would actually make a little noise about it.

Posted By: Jason Douglas (Registered) on March 17, 2010 at 10:40 AM
----------------------------------------

Yeah, I've been wondering that too - I'd hope that if he's done in the ring he goes back to training the Divas. He seemed to have done a good job with them back before his return to full time wrestling, and there seems to be some potential with a few of them (Fox, Eve, Layla, maybe even Tiffany) that some good solid training could really help them improve.


Posted By: Live from the 305 (Guest)  on March 19, 2010 at 06:22 PM

 


www.41mania.com
Copyright � 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.