411Mania’s Countdown to Wrestlemania XXVI 3.24.10: The Economics of 'Mania
Posted by JP Prag on 03.24.2010
How has WrestleMania changed the economics of wrestling and the rest of the planet? Will WrestleMania be around forever, or could its days be numbered? Today, JP Prag explores the business side of WrestleMania and just how much it has changed our world.
Image by Meehan
THE HAMILTON AVE JOURNAL MAGAZINE
By JP Prag
Volume 1 – Issue 1
ABOUT THE JOURNAL MAGAZINE
The Hamilton Ave Journal Magazine is the only wrestling supplement focused solely on the business of wrestling. In this premier issue of the Journal Magazine, we explore the impact of WrestleMania on wrestling, television, and the world in the only place it matters: the bottom line.
Who am I? I am JP Prag: consultant, entrepreneur, businessman, journalist, and wrestling fan.
Now, the market may be closed, but that won't stop us from ringing the bell.
Pay Per View
When talking about WrestleMania, the first thing that comes to mind is the "Pay Per View" extravaganza of the year. Of course, it was not always that way. The first WrestleMania actually took place via Closed Circuit Television where people went to arenas around the country to view the show. Still, at the time WrestleMania was seen by over one million people, making it the largest Closed Circuit Television event of its time. The then WWF proved there was an audience to be reached beyond just the arenas, and they wanted to see what that really met.
This led the way to "The Wrestling Classic" on November 15, 1985. While WrestleMania was available on PPV in a few select markets, The Wrestling Classic was the WWE's first attempt to do a nationwide PPV. They would not try again until WrestleMania 2 on April 7, 1986. There would be no more PPVs from the WWE until the next WrestleMania on March 29, 1987. The show had a tremendous 10.2 buyrate, assuring the future of WrestleManias and PPV in general. Because of the success of WrestleMania 3, the WWE decided to expand their PPV offerings, starting with the now defunct Survivor Series in on November 26, 1987.
As PPV and cable availability expanded, the buyrates for WrestleMania dropped. But they were not dropping in so much as the audience was necessarily dwindling, but that the company could just only capture a certain percentage of the audience at the time. Successively the buyrates went:
1987: 10.2
1988: 6.5
1989: 5.9
1990: 3.8
1991: 2.8
1992: 2.3
1993: 2.0
1994: 1.68
Buyrates would continue to drop for the WWE after 1994 as their product fell out favor and then WCW gained momentum. In 1997, WrestleMania had just a 0.77 buyrate before the company's huge rebound. The next year buyrates went up to 2.3, an increase of nearly 300%. However, 1994 is an interesting year to view the PPV industry.
While Video on Demand (VOD) may seem a relatively new technology today, testing for it actually began in 1994. At that time, though, it was not technically feasible and the dominance of wrestling continued. From The Museum of Broadcast Communication:
Apart from such failures as the Triplecast, PPV revenues have risen annually and stood at $413 million in 1994. Boxing and wrestling PPV events accounted for nearly half of that total, and movies accounted for the other half.
In 1994, Wrestling PPVs look to have accounted for around $100 million, and WrestleMania would have a significant chunk of that. But that is nothing compared to today's numbers.
WrestleMania 25 last year grossed approximately $21.0 million in revenue with 960,000 buys. While the total buys was down from the year before (1.06 million), due to price increases, the prevalence of HD, and international buys the show actually performed better. Yes, WrestleMania 24 grossed approximately $23.8 million on PPV, but the domestic numbers were higher causing a lower margin.
And going back one more year, no WrestleMania had more buys then the 1.2 million that watched WrestleMania 23. Unfortunately for the WWE, that would still not put it on the top ten selling PPV events of all time. Despite WrestleMania being so pivotal in the creation of PPV, it is boxing events that make up the entire top ten, with the lowest having 1.25 million purchases.
Nowadays, WrestleMania is the only wrestling PPV that actually makes the annual top ten, snuggling in between UFC and boxing matches. On top of that, the WWE is seeing a much larger percentage of buys coming from international buyers as opposed to domestic like their competition. For 2009, the top ten domestic PPVs were (courtesy of Dave Metzer):
1. UFC 100: Brock Lesnar vs. Frank Mir, July 11, 1.6 million
2. Boxing: Manny Pacquiao vs. Miguel Cotto, Nov. 14, 1.25 million
3. Boxing: Floyd Mayweather Jr. vs. Juan Manuel Marquez, Sept. 19, 1.05 millon
4. UFC 94: Georges St. Pierre vs. B.J. Penn, Jan. 31, 920,000 buys
5. UFC 101: Penn vs. Kenny Florian/Anderson Silva vs. Forrest Griffin, Aug. 8, 850,000
6. Boxing: Pacquiao vs. Ricky Hatton, May 2, 825,000
7t. UFC 107: Penn vs. Diego Sanchez, Dec. 12, 650,000
7t. UFC 97: Silva vs. Thales Leites/Chuck Liddell vs. Mauricio Rua, April 18, 650,000
9. UFC 99: Lyoto Machida vs. Rashad Evans/Matt Hughes vs. Matt Serra, May 23, 635,000
10. Wrestling: WWE WrestleMania 25, April 5, 582,000 buys
WrestleMania is still a huge deal in the PPV world and outsells 99% of the competition, but the ones that beat it do so soundly. WrestleMania is still exceptionally important to the future of PPV, but the WWE simply does not have the same bargaining power they had in 1987.
Local Economy
Starting with the aforementioned WrestleMania 23, the WWE began to calculate the economic impact of WrestleMania. The WWE wanted to prove that brining WrestleMania to a community actually improved conditions in the area, in the same way that the SuperBowl or the Academy Awards does. While the WWE has never claimed to have the impact of those two events, the company does contend that what they offer should be seriously considered.
In 2007, the WWE released a statement saying that WresteMania 23 in Detroit added $25 million in to the local struggling economy. Even though the numbers were estimated by the WWE, this number began to turn heads and others wanted to gain that income. Orlando made a pitch to host WrestleMania 24 that the WWE was quite impressed with and Orlando's plan worked much better than expected. Instead of a mere $25 million, the event brought $51.5 million in impact and $1.8 million in tax revenue. From the Orlando Sentinel:
WrestleMania XXIV brought more than the Undertaker to Central Florida. The World Wrestling Entertainment event, held in the Florida Citrus Bowl in March, generated more than $51.5 million in economic ripple effect for Central Florida, according to a study by Enigma Research Corp. of Toronto.
WrestleMania drew fans from all 50 states and 21 countries, according to the Central Florida Sports Commission. About three-quarters of the spectators came from beyond Central Florida and stayed for an average of 3.8 nights. The Enigma study indicated that $1.8 million was generated in local tax revenue. Sam Stark, president of the sports commission, said there was "clear indication" that WWE fans want to return to the Citrus Bowl for WrestleMania in the future.
This was the first year the WWE employed Enigma, and they would do so again for the following year. From the WWE's press release:
World Wrestling Entertainment® announced today that The 25th Anniversary of WrestleMania generated a $49.8 million dollar economic windfall for the greater Houston area, according to a study conducted by the Enigma Research Corporation. Despite one of the biggest economic downturns in recent history, local and state governments collected $5.7 million in taxes. This follows the $51.5 million of economic impact WrestleMania XXIV brought to Orlando.
"Having the opportunity to host The 25th Anniversary of WrestleMania was a huge honor and success," said Greg Ortale, President and CEO of the Greater Houston Convention & Visitor's Bureau. "The direct expenditure demonstrates that WrestleMania is indeed economically on par with the world's greatest sports and entertainment offerings."
"Our overarching goal with our public and private sector partners is to consistently provide positive economic impact for WrestleMania's host communities and establish a lasting pro-social legacy, "said John P. Saboor, Senior Vice President of Special Events for World Wrestling Entertainment.
As the years moved on, the impact of WrestleMania both on the economy and on the tax revenue has drastically increased. Glendale can expect a similar impact if the numbers are to be believed, but there are some numbers we do know.
WWE's Bottom Line
As one should know, the WWE isn't in this just to look good; they want to make a sizeable profit. As covered in the Journal, the WWE had a huge problem through 2008 and halfway through 2009 where cost were rising while revenues were not meeting pace. Even though the WWE had their highest grossing WrestleMania, their profits were on the decline. From the Hollywood Reporter:
Meanwhile, WrestleMania's bottom-line contribution has fluctuated more, with profits ranging from $7.1 million to more than twice that in recent years. The company succeeded in improving the profit contribution since a weaker 2008 result.
"We don't give specific guidance every year, but we have said we weren't happy with the 2008 numbers," WWE CFO George Barrios said.
What are his expectations for this year's event? "Most important is that the show is compelling to the audience, and things will be a bit different every year depending where we are, etc.," Barrios said. "But we know it won't be like 2008. We feel pretty good about the numbers."
Overall, WrestleMania is always "the biggest pay-per-view of the year in revenue, and it was by far the most profitable in 2009," he added. And it is typically one of the best-selling PPVs of the year with about 1 million buys around the world.
How profitable was that? Well, in 2008 WrestleMania accounted for $31.3 million in revenue across all business segments (live events, PPVs, merchandise, etc...) and had $7.1 million profit margin for a profit margin percentage of 22.7%. In 2009 that number went to $32.2 million in revenue and profit margin of $15.0 million, or 46.6%. As the further comparison point, WrestleMania 23 in 2007 generated $31.4 million in revenue and had $9.7 million in profit, or 30.9%. As can be seen here, costs were out of control in 2008 but the WWE was not only able to get them in line--they actually expanded profitability to new heights.
Revenue wise, WrestleMania has been flat overall the past few years, but profitability has been the name of the game. Because of the control in place today, expect WrestleMania 26 to do even better in total profitability.
Competition
With numbers like the local impact listed above along with the WWE's profitability, it has become carte blanche for cities to compete for the right to host WrestleMania. Years ago, the WWE had trouble finding homes despite the success on PPV. Today, it is a totally different story.
Since before WrestleMania 25 ended, cities began competing for the right to host WrestleMania 27. These cities put together packages and presentations, flew in WWE representatives, and made every concerted effort to get on the WWE's docket. While cities like Miami, Indianapolis, and Toronto fell by the way side, Atlanta was able to rise above the pack. What Atlanta offered that the other cities did not remains unknown at this time, but the WWE has let them know they are all in the running to host a WrestleMania in the future.
And now, the competition is on again for WrestleMania 28, 29, and 30. Cities around North America are putting together packages now to bring WrestleMania to their hometown, but the WWE is hoping some will accept an alternative.
The model for WrestleMania is something the WWE hopes to replicate with SummerSlam. While they know they will not see the same level of dollars, at even half of these figures SummerSlam could mean a lot to the WWE and the communities it goes to. Meanwhile, the fight continues for who will host the next WrestleMania with cities hoping to do everything Orlando and Houston did, except better.
WrestleMania in Total
From the numbers above, WrestleMania is making a fair amount of change. Looking at the three most recent years, let us break down WrestleMania in terms of the WWE's total numbers.
WrestleMania 23 generated $31.4 million in revenue and $6.6 million in profit net of tax. For that same year, the company had $485.7 million in revenue and $52.1 million in profit, meaning WrestleMania accounted for 6.5% of revenue and 12.7% of profit.
WrestleMania 24 saw $31.3 million in revenue but just $4.6 million in profit net of tax. In that year, the company had $526.5 million in revenue and $45.4 million in profit. With that, WrestleMania accounted for 5.9% of revenue and 10.1% of profit.
WrestleMania 25 had $32.2 million in revenue and $9.7 million in profit net of cash. This was in comparison to $475.2 million in revenue and $50.3 million in profit. This lead to margins of 6.8% of revenue and 19.3% of profit.
From these numbers above, it is quite obvious that WrestleMania plays a major role in the WWE's top and bottom line, and that percentage has grown in the past year. That said, what is most amazing is how non-dependent on WrestleMania the WWE actually is. Should the event disappear tomorrow for whatever reason, the WWE would still have $40 million in profit. In one way it is a saving grace for the WWE that if everything went wrong the company would be just fine. On the other hand, commoditizing WrestleMania shows just how easily it could be replaced or removed.
Today, no one may think that WrestleMania may come to an end, but one day it may not be economically feasible for it continue. As the WWE diversifies their revenue and profit base, WrestleMania will hold less of a stronghold in the WWE pantheon of dollar generators.
Does it seem so crazy that it could happen? After 23 years, Survivor Series was dropped because it was deemed not worthy any more, so what should be learned is that nothing is sacred.
As for the here and now, WrestleMania holds a vital importance to the company and the communities it inhabits, but that may not be the end result in the future. PPV can drop in importance, delivery models can completely change, competition can force unexpected change, and plethora of other situations can make WrestleMania a thing of the past.
What one has to remember is that the WWE is in the business of making money, not in the business of putting on the best wrestling or sports entertainment product they can. With that, the traditions that it created do not hold the importance that they do outside the company. One day, WrestleMania may be such a small percentage of revenue and profit (or lack thereof) that it may no longer be worth it.
Is that day coming soon? Not likely with the numbers that are showing here. Yet one should always be sure to watch those profitability lines because the WWE--like any company--will cut one of their longest standing ways of life in order to chase the most reasonable dollar.
WWE makes more money in one night (WrestleMania) than TNA makes all year.
Nice war people.....
Posted By: Marky Mark (Guest) on March 23, 2010 at 11:05 PM
Money? SO WHAT!!! TNA has awesome wrestlers man! Who cares about ratings and making money off PPV's!!!!!
Posted By: Chungles (Guest) on March 23, 2010 at 11:08 PM
"One day, WrestleMania may be such a small percentage of revenue and profit (or lack thereof) that it may no longer be worth it."
Like you said later on, with the recent numbers this won't happen anytime soon. Not only that, but the recent trend seems to be showing the exact opposite, with WWE relying even more on Wrestlemania to make their bottom line as profit percentages go up (10% in 2008 to 19% in 2009, likely even higher in 2010).
So, at one point does the WWE look at this and consider that they may be putting too many eggs into one Wrestlemania basket, considering they're supposed to be diversifying their revenue?
Posted By: Fatt Hardy (Guest) on March 24, 2010 at 12:05 AM
So to sum up, TNA is no threat?
Posted By: Guest#8942 (Guest) on March 24, 2010 at 12:26 AM
Great article!
Posted By: bunkee (Guest) on March 24, 2010 at 12:39 AM
First of all, let me say I like both WWE & TNA. But TNA has a long way to go. The only thing I like about TNA is the in ring action because TNA allows their wrestlers to perform without limitations. With that being said WWE's best wrestling is on Smackdown & Superstars. If WWE would give their wrestlers more freedom, then TNA better watch out. The problem with WWE is that overall the company is just average and sometimes it gets stale. TNA Impact feels more exciting. But I hope TNA gets better as far as storylines and direction and maybe they'll make WWE step their game up. Because I wanna see a great product from both companies.
Posted By: MrBizzel (Guest) on March 24, 2010 at 12:57 AM
Money? SO WHAT!!! TNA has awesome wrestlers man! Who cares about ratings and making money off PPV's!!!!!
Posted By: Chungles (Guest) on March 23, 2010 at 11:08 PM
Yeh man! and while were at it, who needs TV shows, as long as long as we have the best talent well stay in bingo halls and high school gyms, it still makes us the best promotion.
Posted By: gooched (Guest) on March 24, 2010 at 01:03 AM
WWE es mierda
Posted By: Guest#8164 (Guest) on March 24, 2010 at 01:07 AM
After 23 years, Survivor Series was dropped because they strayed from the concept.
The face vs heel dynamic is no longer there.
They had one 5 on 5 match, if that, and the name didn't fit anymore.
Posted By: Gobeldygooker (Guest) on March 24, 2010 at 01:57 AM
the war hasnt even begun you idiots.
Posted By: shabba (Guest) on March 24, 2010 at 03:04 AM
War or no war, it sure doesn't stop some sad people from talking about it in an article that had nothing to do with it.
Posted By: Hoodoo91 (Guest) on March 24, 2010 at 04:57 AM
lets not forget the effect of the internet on ppv buyrates. more and more people are watching illegal streams instead of shelling out $55.
Posted By: rey (Guest) on March 24, 2010 at 05:03 AM
The IWC is stupid. All they seem to care about is TNA vs WWE on a well written article.
I'll admit that since I don't work for the WWE i often don't read or care much about their finance but this was a good read.
Posted By: Guest#9840 (Guest) on March 24, 2010 at 05:14 AM
WWE makes more people in wrestlemania than cricket world cup
Posted By: ANKIT BASOYA (Guest) on March 24, 2010 at 05:46 AM
"Money? SO WHAT!!! TNA has awesome wrestlers man! Who cares about ratings and making money off PPV's!!!!!
Posted By: Chungles (Guest) on March 23, 2010 at 11:08 PM"
WE DO TNA BLIND GROUPIE !
And I take EDGE, PUNK, JERICHO, HBK and TAKER over POPE, NASH,HALL, WOLFE, ABYSS ANY DAY OF The YEAR !
WWE >>>> TNA
DIG IT !
Posted By: Mr Mania (Guest) on March 24, 2010 at 06:08 AM
"
So to sum up, TNA is no threat?
Posted By: Guest#8942 (Guest) on March 24, 2010 at 12:26 AM"
TNA is not even a "threat" to NXT , now let's get SERIOUS .
Are people dumb or what here ?
You think TNA can beat the money Vince is making AT MANIA ?
What's next TNA is making more money than Vince WORLDWIDE TOO while the WWE House Shows in Europe are SOLD OUT A few hours after the tix are avaiable while TNA CANCELLED dates in both France and Australia and almost cancelled the one remaining date in PARIS FRANCE because the arena was 3/4 EMPTY while the TWO SD! Paris SHOW Sold out with FRONT TIX costing 150 dollars ONE ?
Keep making me laugh TNA Marks you're really funny !
Posted By: WWE OWNS TNA (Guest) on March 24, 2010 at 06:11 AM
"Money? SO WHAT!!! TNA has awesome wrestlers man! Who cares about ratings and making money off PPV's!!!!!
Posted By: Chungles (Guest) on March 23, 2010 at 11:08 PM"
I hope you get that no one cares about your TNA blind groupie opinion, especially in an article talking about Mania business.
Money is what pays the salaries of any talent on earth and person working for the company, they make for better production value and oh wait they make for RAW being LIVE EVERY MONDAY and not TWO WEEKS a month like your so called "great product with great talent".
Guess what ?
I take Punk and Jericho over AJ and Abyss every day of the year and night.
Same for Edge, Taker, HBK, The Harts, Bryan, Gabriel, Ziggler, Kofi, Shelton, Christian ect ect
WWE has BOTH the talent AND the money.
Oh and the ratings Dixie was creaming her pants talking about when TNA did 1.4 IMO !
Talk about Irony !
Keep enjoying you second rate company no one in the world gives a damn about, the WWE IS Pro Wrestling, TNA is a Failure .
Posted By: Facts Just Facts (Guest) on March 24, 2010 at 06:30 AM
The Face/Heel dynamic still works and is part of wrestling history and success.
So much Guys like Dan Hardy, Frank Mir and Josh Koscheck are acting like "heels" in MMA.
Same for Aoki, how ironic is this ?
Posted By: Guest#5435 (Guest) on March 24, 2010 at 06:31 AM
To whomever posted the comment below:
You need to learn what the late great Lou Thesz (sp) said about wrestling.
'Pro wrestling is a way to make money...period.'
Money? SO WHAT!!! TNA has awesome wrestlers man! Who cares about ratings and making money off PPV's!!!!!
Posted By: Guest#7650 (Guest) on March 24, 2010 at 06:34 AM
Sir,
A great breakdown of the numbers. It does show the importance that a major 'Sporting' event has on a local community in terms of the revenues it produces for the company and the community it affects. As an aside would you have the numbers that the WWE produces on major events in the UK?
Thanks.
Posted By: Chifoe (Guest) on March 24, 2010 at 06:35 AM
It's article about profit at Wrestlemania - shut up with your stupid wwe vs tna point. Noone cares about it.
Posted By: Guest#3540 (Guest) on March 24, 2010 at 07:45 AM
Hey man great work on the oarticle week after week. It is interesting,(even though sometimes boring) to learn about the financials of the WWE. Where do you get your information. It must take a lot of time to dig up all these numbers.
Posted By: Guest#0683 (Guest) on March 24, 2010 at 08:18 AM
Great article but I think you left some info out.
do these numbers include the other events surrounding wrestlemania weekend? I'm sure they take a bite out of their margin.
I would also like to see a comparison of the rest of their ppvs profit margins. While 6-`0 million dollars is a lot of money, it may not be worth it to put on the spectacle of WM if they are doing better margins on normal ppvs.
Posted By: Guest#5269 (Guest) on March 24, 2010 at 08:26 AM
"What one has to remember is that the WWE is in the business of making money, not in the business of putting on the best wrestling or sports entertainment product they can."
It's sad that one doesn't lead to the other. Entertainment is unique like that. You can't imagine Sony increasing prices and simultaneously reducing quality.
Posted By: Loki (Guest) on March 24, 2010 at 08:45 AM
10.2 buyrate for WM III? Granted this is in a day with smaller PPV numbers, but damn that is a huge number.
Posted By: Rick (Guest) on March 24, 2010 at 09:10 AM
I wish they'd bring Wrestlemania to Manchester :(
Posted By: Mentalist (Guest) on March 24, 2010 at 09:42 AM
Interesting column, I always presumed that Wrestlemania was at the heart of WWE's profits. Though it accounts for a large chunk of income it is possible to cut WM out and not be totally screwed.
Posted By: Andrew Barbarash (Guest) on March 24, 2010 at 10:33 AM
Half a report, the 'profi' is probably not net, meaning that is howmuc money the company is actually making above and beyond every expense they have.
Not to mention the numbers are probably taken from reports or estimates and not actual legal documents.
Also have ot figure WWE is a public company so obviously they need to make more, but what they actually keep is a lot different than what TNA does as an LLC.
I also laugh at this...
From these numbers above, it is quite obvious that WrestleMania plays a major role in the WWE's top and bottom line, and that percentage has grown in the past year. That said, what is most amazing is how non-dependent on WrestleMania the WWE actually is. Should the event disappear tomorrow for whatever reason, the WWE would still have $40 million in profit. In one way it is a saving grace for the WWE that if everything went wrong the company would be just fine. On the other hand, commoditizing WrestleMania shows just how easily it could be replaced or removed.
And if you dont know why that is funny/stupid you shouldnt be writing a blog about economics.
But basically you do what every other economics person I ever met in college does, you take a bunch of 'fact', and fgures and numbers, and present them based upon the best andhighest percentage viewpoint that makes the case you want. When using the actual numbers is a lot more relevant and can't always be spun in more positive ways.
WWE makes money, no doubt, but not nearly as much as they maybe could or should considering the amount of people they get to watch them on a weekly basis. But here is a question for the author, what is a good average per viewer in terms of profit obatined? Menaing if WWE has 50 million in profits and lets say 10 million veiwers/consumers, is 5 bux a person profit good or bad? THAt is really where peopelshould focus. Just ebcause you havemore people watching doesnt mean anything unless they are actually spending more or at least account for more (due to ad revenue speculations and whatnot). Because if ROH has say 500K viewers but their fans account for 20 bux a head towards their profits who is doing better? Or if TNA gets 12 bux a head per fan are they doing better? It might not be the best "econimcal" results, but if people spend more for one produnt than another on average that product IMO is more successful, just because a bigger company with more money to begin with spends and makes more overal shouldnt be a secret.
Posted By: Rich (Guest) on March 24, 2010 at 12:37 PM
the only way Wrestlemania will come back to Orlando is if they renovate the Citrus Bowl because I was there and in the upper sections there are no seats per se.
Posted By: Robert (Guest) on March 24, 2010 at 12:47 PM
Wrestlemania 26 > Last Night's Impact
Posted By: Guest#6860 (Guest) on March 24, 2010 at 01:24 PM
You, sir, are an insightful fellow. The fact that they build up WM as their biggest event is a way to make money. And yeah, I've often wondered about how WWE does off the show and how it boosts the local economy and the places around it.
Posted By: Guest#4065 (Guest) on March 24, 2010 at 02:03 PM
@Marky Mark: TNA makes around $50 million in revenue a year. Also, WrestleMania does make all of its money in one night, but over a period of months that includes DVD sales, future PPV purchases, late selling merchandise, and international re-distribution.
@Fatt Hardy: WWE's cost cutting measures have actually just made 'Mania more profitable, so they are not likely to be that highly dependent on it. It's not like a store in the mall that only goes into the black once a year.
@Chifoe: WWE does not break up their European operations by country, so that data would not be readily available. Inside the WWE's financial databases, yes, they quite know.
@Guest#0683: Most of the financial data comes through the reports the WWE submits to the SEC. It takes a long time to read through those and synthesize the important data. Other information like buyrates is usually available through many different databases and websites. As for historical impacts and other things going on in the world, that just takes old fashion reading through 10 pages to get 10 words.
@Guest#5269: The exact breakdown of what the WWE considers "WrestleMania" (PPV, gate, live event, merchandise, DVD, etc...) is not specifically stated, but usually they represent what is in there as "WrestleMania" itself. The "Economic impact" on the other hand is considering all of those other events. But do not forget that they are hosting things like the Hall of Fame and Axxess at a profit as well, otherwise they would not do them.
@Rich: The numbers for WrestleMania revenue and profit come directly from the 10K reports the WWE files with the SEC and are reviewed by their auditor (re: Are super 'legal'). Economic Impact comes from a third party survey/consulting firm. PPV dollars is an estimate based on known sales times the average selling price.
As stated in the article, the profit was net of all expenses and taxes. Earlier in the article the figures were posted net of expenses but not taxes.
Also, I'm sorry that you do not see the value in simple subtraction showing the WWE could survive without WrestleMania. I'm more sorry that you missed the point that I do not think the WWE should exist without WrestleMania, but that if worse came to worst the WWE could go along just fine without it.
As far as "good" and "bad" profit, that is a matter of judgment for the company. So long as they are profitable and costs are under control, any profit should be considered "good". Also, it will be a whole separate article to go into the intricacies of who and what is a "customer" of the WWE and how you would derive such a figure. The math is not the simple model you propose.
Posted By: JP Prag (Registered) on March 24, 2010 at 02:15 PM
Do you WWE marks have to get your anti TBA diatribe into everything. TNA was not mentioned once in this article.
TNA marks are annoying, WWE marks are hysterical.
Posted By: Vince McWoman (Guest) on March 24, 2010 at 02:36 PM
Great article JP; well researched, well written.
Posted By: Probes (Guest) on March 24, 2010 at 02:57 PM
Wow the TNA hate on this website went from bad to terrible in the last few weeks.
You just can't excape someone hating on TNA on any article anymore. Half of them don't even mention TNA (like this one)
Posted By: Guest#2336 (Guest) on March 24, 2010 at 03:43 PM
Hulkama....I mean Wrestlemania will never die, brother!
Posted By: Bob (Guest) on March 24, 2010 at 09:05 PM
Money? SO WHAT!!! TNA has awesome wrestlers man! Who cares about ratings and making money off PPV's!!!!!
Posted By: Chungles (Guest) on March 23, 2010 at 11:08 PM
The awesome wrestlers care about making money and so do the other hundreds of people who work in the company office and at the arena.
Posted By: nanoman (Guest) on March 24, 2010 at 09:38 PM
Damn, I never realised UFC was slaying WWE so hard in the PPV market... 1.6 million buys for Brock/Mir? DOMESTIC? That's insane!!! WWE going PG suddenly makes a lot more sense...
Posted By: Guest#6131 (Guest) on March 25, 2010 at 08:55 PM
The one alarming statistic I grab from this is that over the past few years Wrestlemania has accounted for 5-6% of WWE's revenue and 10-20% of their profit. With all of that the being said, if the day ever came when the event became obsolete, the WWE would still prosper as the most powerful entity in the industry.
It comes with great satisfaction on my part to see that cities around the US formally bid annually for the right to host future Wrestlemania's years down the road due to the great economic impact that it can have, and people call pro wrestling is "silly" haha.
Posted By: Justin (Guest) on April 05, 2010 at 01:32 PM
Copyright � 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.