www.411mania.com
|  News |  Columns |  TV Reports |  Video Reviews |  Title History |  Hall of Fame |  News Report |  The Dunn List |
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// Irina Shayk Shows Off Her Killer Curves At Cannes
MUSIC
// Kanye West and Jay-Z's Watch the Throne 2 Confirmed
WRESTLING
// Brooke Hogan Says Hulk Didn't Know She Was in Talks With TNA
POLITICS
// Obama Leads In Florida, Ohio, & VIrginia
MMA
// 411's MMA Roundtable - UFC 146: Dos Santos vs. Mir
GAMES
// Castlevania: Lords of Shadow Sequel Teased


 HOT TOPICS
//  CM Punk
//  John Cena
//  Triple H
//  Hulk Hogan
//  Randy Orton
//  Christian
SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds





Follow 411mania on Twitter!




Add 411 On Facebook
 



 
 411mania » Wrestling » Columns



Advertisement
The Triple Threat 9.05.10: The 202nd Edition - No Surrender, Kaval Wins NXT, Possible Title Unifications, More
Posted by David Martell on 09.05.2010



Photobucket

Topic # 1 TNA‘s No Surrender is this Sunday. What are your thoughts on the card?

Photobucket


David Martell: This card looks half decent to me but nothing special. I am not a big fan of a PPV not having a World Title match but I guess it is understandable in this case. Velvet Sky vs. Madison Rayne will be a typical women's match but I guarantee a run in of some sort. Abyss vs. Rhino sounds awful on paper and that is what I am expecting. Abyss will win hands down. I don't expect much from Kevin Nash and Sting vs. Jarrett and Joe. It will be a decent match at best. Jarrett and Joe will probably win here. AJ Styles vs. Tommy Dreamer in an I Quit match could be good. Dreamer can have good matches when he wants to and I expect him to win here to have the upper hand. Wolfe and Magnus vs. the MCMGs could be the match of the night if given time. Glad to see a new team going for the belts but I really cant see the MCMGs losing the titles so fast after having the best of five series with Beer Money. Mr. Anderson vs. Pope should be good and I expect Anderson to win here. Angle vs. Jeff Hardy should be damn good and hopefully this is the main event. I am convinced that Angle will win the whole thing and eventually regain the TNA World Title. It is all in his storyline. Overall it could be a decent PPV but I don't know if it is worth the buy.

Jacob San Antonio: Interesting looking card, with a couple of no brainers thrown in. Kurt Angle will beat Jeff Hardy and advance to the finals of the championship tournament. Anderson will go over Dinero and meet Angle in the finals. Angle's been working his way up the roster over the past few months, so I think barring any surprise finishes he's going to walk out of No Surrender the heavyweight champion. I really doubt the Machineguns are going to lose to Desmond Wolfe and Magnus, but it should still prove to be an exciting match. I find it hard to believe AJ Styles would lose and "I Quit" match with Tommy Dreamer, so unless TNA is purposely making this look obvious I expect Styles to win. I get the feeling Jarret and Samoa Joe will beat Sting and Kevin Nash, though I've got my fingers crossed for a great match regardless. With three of the wrestlers involved getting pretty old, it's hard to say just what level of performance we'll get. Abyss will win over Rhino, unless anybody interferes in their matchup. Douglas Willams will retain against Sabu, and Madison Rayne will win against Velvet Sky. The tournament has me interested, as does the "I Quit" match, but otherwise I'm not that wow-ed by this PPV. I'm always open to being proven wrong, though.

Zach Brown: This year's No Surrender has a decent looking card in terms of match quality, but it looks like it's also fairly predictable. First of all, Velvet Sky vs. Madison Rayne....I expect Rayne to win here since Velvet just hasn't shown as much in-ring dominance as Madison. Plus, Angelina and Tara will get involved, giving it a screwy finish. And why has TNA made the match for Rhino vs. Abyss? Is anyone actually thinking that TNA will give Rhino the win and push him out of nowhere? It's seriously laughable. It may be a decent two star brawl at the very best. Douglas Williams vs. Sabu is an interesting choice as well. I definitely don't know how well these styles will match up. But I think it's obvious that Williams will retain here. Sting and Nash vs. Jarrett and Joe...that is something that I am not exactly clamoring to see. At least Samoa Joe stepped in instead of Hogan because then it simply would have been a battle between the geriatrics of TNA. But this match will likely be very slow paced and seeing Nash and Sting pick up the win. AJ Styles vs. Tommy Dreamer in an I Quit match...I see AJ being the one to say "I Quit" because of his cowardly personality. But I also expect him to just walk out instead of being beaten to the point where he has to quit. But this match could be a sleeper hit if done right. MCMG vs. Wolfe and Magnus should be an excellent, show stealing match. If Wolfe and Magnus can pick up the pace where Beer Money left off (which I'm sure they can), then this may be the start of a beautiful new tag team feud in TNA. And finally, the tournament semifinals to determine who is champion while RVD washes off all that barbeque sauce that Abyss put on him. Anderson vs. Pope is a great matchup but I expect Anderson to get the win here. He's getting a bigger push, and it makes sense for Anderson and Angle to have a rematch. And that sort of tells you who I expect to win between Hardy and Angle. Even with his drug charges, it's hard to believe that TNA hasn't utilized arguably WWE's biggest star of last year better than they have. And I still doubt they will move Hardy closer to the belt in this instance. Angle needs to win here because of his storyline. I think that TNA needs to find a way to give Anderson or someone else the belt without forcing Kurt to retire because of his storyline. They've kind of booked themselves into a corner on this one. As for the event as a whole, it has three matches that look excellent, while the rest is either meh, unpredictable in quality, or completely predictable in outcome. Plain and simple, it's a bad undercard. It could pull out some surprises, but I think that No Surrender is only a buy for the die hard TNA fan.

Topic # 2 Kaval won season 2 of NXT this past week. Your thoughts?

Photobucket


David Martell: Kaval very much deserved to win NXT season two. He has been in the business for over a decade and he has worked his ass off wrestling around the world to get to this point. It is hard to believe that a few years ago I saw this guy in person at some garbage indy promotion. It is also hard to believe that he has a title shot. It will be interesting to see where he goes with that. I am also wondering what brand he will be going to. He could end up on RAW and teaming up with Daniel Bryan which is fine with me. They could make the tag team division look more legitimate. I could also see him going to Smackdown where he can get a good amount of TV time and could actually be a part of the main event. Either way I am happy.

Jacob San Antonio: I'm shocked to see them give him the win. With how Daniel Bryan was treated with the whole "Internet Darling" angle, it's surprising to see the WWE acknowledge Kaval's abilities. I've got to give credit where credit is due, though. Throughout this season of NXT I've been entertained by LayCool working as his pros. I wasn't too excited about it when they initially announced the pairing, but the WWE played it perfectly. The rest of the finale to NXT was less than stellar, thanks to the abysmal promos made by the likes of McGillicutty and the eliminated rookies. The ending to the show has yet to make sense to me, but I'm hoping we don't see a new Nexus-type group made of Season 2's rookies. That'd be terrible, at this point.

Zach Brown: It's good that WWE let the odds on favorite win this time around. It's almost like an apology for how they treated Daniel Bryan in Season 1. Not that Wade Barrett isn't awesome, but you know what I mean. Kaval was by far the standout of Season 2. Even McGillicutty's promo after he lost about the "Genesis of McGillicutty" was lackluster and almost made me laugh. It just further proved why Kaval is the winner. No other wrestler had anything on Kaval this season. And then the post victory beatdown occurred. What an absolute clusterfuck. Not only did Titus O' Neil no-sell MVP's Drive-By like it was nothing, but Alex Riley proceeded to beat the piss out of Percy Watson, hit his finisher on him, throw him out of the ring, and then Watson gets in the ring like nothing happens 2 minutes later and they act like nothing happened! Did he just forget that he was supposed to be attacking pros? That whole segment is just begging to be put on Botchamania. And what is WWE doing? Creating another Nexus? One former NXT stable is enough, but two is pushing it. Maybe Nexus can pluck a few members from Season 2 to increase their numbers. But as for Kaval, I couldn't be happier for the guy. I am in disbelief that he now has a title shot. I can't wait to see how he integrates into Smackdown or Raw, and I can't wait to see him becoming the next breakout star.

Topic # 3 Chris Jericho and the WWE still haven't come to terms for a new contract. How do you feel about this?



David Martell: I would be pretty sad if Jericho was going to leave the WWE again. He has always been one of my favorite guys to watch and since his last return, he has been awesome. Jericho's character has always evolved and right now he is by far one of the best heels in wrestling today. I can understand that he deserves a break but I don't want him to leave for a few years. Losing Jericho means losing good matches. Jericho had a decent match with the Great Khali the other night and that is basically impossible. I know Jericho is a busy man with his book writing and his band but I don't want to see him take a long break from wrestling.

Jacob San Antonio: I'm not too worried about this. At the worst, Jericho takes some time off before coming back in a few months. Best case scenario, nothing changes with the exception of Jericho missing a few shows. He's been juggling his wrestling career and his rock band for a while now, and even if he's running into a roadblock right now I'm sure he can get past it. A world without Jericho wrestling in some capacity just doesn't seem possible to me, so I'm absolutely certain this will work itself out with little to no consequence in the long run.

Zach Brown: I really hope that Jericho decides to stay in WWE. I have thoroughly enjoyed Jericho's return to WWE. He's had great runs with the World title, he made the Intercontinental Championship mean something while he had it, he reinvigorated the tag division with JeriShow, he's awesome on the mic, and he has been one of WWE's most solid performers year after year. If Jericho decided not to renew his contract, I imagine that he would simply retire from wrestling for good. I don't imagine he would go to TNA. There is no reason for him to do that. I expect he would go back to touring more with Fozzy, and/or trying to get into more movies. But leaving WWE would be a mistake for Jericho. He is healthy, he's never been injured, and he has a good five years left or more in wrestling if he wants. Sure, the argument could be made that he has done all there is to do, but this is one older guy in WWE that I do not want to stop wrestling. Because unlike Cena, Triple H, or Undertaker, Jericho actually puts younger guys over on a consistent basis. Jericho is constantly awesome, and I would be very disappointed if he didn't renew his contract with WWE.

Topic # 4 There are rumors going around that the WWE is going to unify their other belts much like the divas titles and the tag titles. How would you feel about this?

Photobucket


David Martell: Well I guess it could lead to some big Mania matches. Undertaker vs. Cena has been rumored for awhile and what better way to make the match even more important. The only real problem I have with this is the fact that there is just too many wrestlers. I mean you could have the champions show up on both shows but what happens when the champion is feuding someone on RAW? It will make Smackdown feel less important. If they decided to combine both rosters and have everyone on both shows, that would just make everything cluttered and many people would have their tv time cut. Storyline wise it could be fun but it wouldn't work for the big picture. I like having two big belts and I like that RAW and Smackdown or separate shows. It is good for the tag belts and the divas titles but the other titles should just be left alone.

Jacob San Antonio: I like the idea of unifying titles, but I seriously don't think it's happening. With the WWE currently pushing their younger talent and gearing the shows to reflect their growing importance, unifying the titles makes for less opportunities for the stuffed roster. Granted, you're not seeing a lot of action with the US Title, and the Intercontinental Title is being used as a prop between Kofi and Ziggler, but the fact remains that having two separate belts allows for more talent to get their chance to play champion. As exciting as it would be to see the return of undisputed champions, I can only really see that being useful for smaller rosters. Coincidentally, I'm pretty glad the Divas are finally unifying their titles again. The WWE refuses to bring up more serious female wrestlers, so only having to be burdened by one Divas' title match a PPV would be a welcome change.

Zach Brown: Well it's just a rumor at this point. Sure, they have unified the tag titles, and are about to unify the women's titles, but I think that these two unifications do not equal a trend. The tag division in WWE was floundering, and it didn't make sense to have two tag champions anyway. So it made sense to unify them. And they never should have created the Divas title in the first place, so unifying those titles is a no-brainer. So it's very possible that the unifications will end there. Should they unify the US Title and IC Title? Hell no. Unifying those two titles almost gives it enough prestige to be the top title of an entire brand. And the US Title and IC titles do a good job of giving two great mid-card wrestlers a way to stand out. They shouldn't lessen that to only one. And the big topic, of course, unifying the WWE title with the World Title. It has it's pros and cons. On one hand, I like the idea of having an Undisputed Champion. Hell, Jericho still talks about that to this day. It's a great feather in any wrestlers cap. But I also like things the way they are right now with the different brands. Two champions, one for each brand. It works. I like that system. If they were to do the Undisputed Champion thing, I guess the champ would defend on both shows. But I would only want it to be for a little while because those belts are too unique and loved to be united for a long period of time. I am especially partial to the look of the World Heavyweight Title. The big gold belt is iconic, and we should always have that image in wrestling. It's much better looking than that glitter sprinkled, bedazzled turd of a spinner belt. If anything, they just need to redesign the WWE Championship and call it a day. If the rumor has any weight to it, I'd rather WWE not unify the remaining titles. It just doesn't need to be done, and I like the brand system the way it is right now.

Topic # 5 What are your thoughts about Serena getting fired?

Photobucket


David Martell: Well is looks like she didn't play the straight edge character in real life. Supposedly she was a real party animal and people were getting pissed that she wasn't keeping kayfabe. I am pretty sure she isn't very happy she had to shave her head now. She was an interesting character but it seems like the SES was going down hill anyways even though I felt like they never really took off as a group. The segment on Smackdown of her drinking was pretty retarded and she really didn't show us much by her one match. I guess she really didn't get the chance to stand out in the first place. I am sure she will be able to find work on the indies easily and hopefully she can get her act together and come back to the WWE in the future.

Jacob San Antonio: This really sucks, mostly due to how close to the chest the WWE is playing it. I'd love to hear the full story on this release, since the few details released about it raises even more questions. The story goes that Serena made a nasty habit of partying way too hard during her time off. This would conflict with the SES angle she's been with for the past couple of months, so it raised a few eyebrows. At a Smackdown a month or two ago you even had CM Punk mention her breaking the SES rules in a weird angle that lasted a week. Supposedly, this was Serena's warning to shape up or pay the consequences. I find it hard to believe that any company would expect wrestlers on the roster to adhere that strictly to kayfabe, but on the other hand the possibility exists that Serena's bad habits were too extensive to ignore. I'm not happy about Serena's leaving, since it's just another blow to the SES, but I figure it must have been quite the problem if the WWE had to warn her on air.

Zach Brown: This isn't the first, and it definitely won't be the last, but I think this was an unwarranted firing on WWE's part. Not living the gimmick? Really? I don't know how severe this was. It could have been anything from her going out and partying and getting drunk to something as simple as her being nice to the fans when she's supposed to be playing heel. Who really knows? If she was in fact getting drunk or something, you could argue that she actually was practicing the gimmick outside WWE since it was in her character to have lapses in the Straight Edge lifestyle. But this is all speculation on my part. No matter what Serena did wrong, it seems like WWE is firing people for lesser and lesser offenses these days. I mean where is the job security for these people? It seems like anyone in the wrestling business except for the main eventers can be fired at the drop of a hat these days. But I digress. Serena was a promising diva. I thought she was a very attractive girl, even after she shaved her head. And the one match she did have made her look good. She did a move that was an homage to the G2S, and it looked sick. I couldn't believe they let her do a move like that in a women's match. And then suddenly, she's gone. She was a solid part of the SES, and now it looks like the stable is breaking up anyway. Oh well. I hope Serena grows her hair back and goes back to being awesome on the indy circuit. WWE could have had a great new diva on their hands, and it's unfortunate to see Serena let go so prematurely.





Photobucket




Our thoughts on Alberto Del Rio.

David Martell: I can definitely see why the WWE didn't put him on NXT. This guys doesn't need any work, he is already on the verge of being a main eventer. You have to give props to the WWE for booking Del Rio perfectly. So far he looks pretty unstoppable. He beat Rey Mysterio clean in his first ever match on Smackdown CLEAN! For a newcomer to beat a main eventer in their first bout is almost unheard of. I love the way he cuts promos and his mannerisms are just perfect. He plays that arrogant rich guy perfectly, its almost scary. I still want to see more of Del Rio in the ring. His Arm Bar finisher looks great and the way he does it bring a real impact to a normal arm bar. I am glad the WWE is bring back submissions to be a normal part of the fold. Overall, Del Rio is a star and he is keeping me watching.

Jacob San Antonio: I was on the fence about this guy back when he was just cutting promos, but I'll admit he's made a believer out of me. Del Rio seems to be the real deal. He's working this heel persona remarkably well, despite the obvious similarities to JBL. He was allowed the benefit of a fantastic victory over Rey Mysterio, and all of a sudden we have another legitimate heel to consider on Smackdown. He's got the physical talent to make himself a star, and he (thankfully) knows how to cut a promo when he needs to. I'm fine with him working a feud against Rey Mysterio for a while, but I'm seriously anxious to see where he can take himself. It's rare that a new face to the WWE makes a successful debut, so I'm really rolling with Del Rio's momentum.

Zach Brown: This guy is a star, plain and simple. He has only been on Smackdown for a few weeks, and everyone is talking about him. He debuted against Rey Mysterio, won decisively, and has been cutting great promos left and right. His recent promo against Christian was entertaining. I'm glad someone finally said that Alberto was like JBL. With the car entrance and the way he dresses, it was a hard thing to ignore. I wish Alberto would say that he is the complete opposite of Eddie Guerrero in that he does the exact opposite of "Lie, Cheat, and Steal." He could say that he's honest, is a sportsman, earned his money, etc. That would make Rey's blood boil. And I'm so glad that someone is using an armbar as their finisher. I've always been surprised that hardly anyone has used it in WWE because it is such a sick move. The one minor complaint I have is the Spanish announcer. That's a little over the top for me. But overall, Alberto has been very impressive thus far, and I can't wait to see him wrestle on Pay Per View.

That is all for this week. Feel free to comment at the bottom of the page and have a great week in wrestling. CYA!


Post Comment (25)  |  Email David Martell  |  View David Martell's 411 Profile

  Send To Friend  |    Stumble It!  |    Digg It!  | 



Please add your comment below.
If you are registered, you can login and post under your registered name. If not, you can post as a guest or register.

* Please note that 411 moderates all comments. Your comment will show up on the site after it has been approved by an editor.
 
Name : 
Comment : 
Remaining Characters : 
2800
 

Comments (25)

 
Zach Brown: This isn't the first, and it definitely won't be the last, but I think this was an unwarranted firing on WWE's part. Not living the gimmick? Really? I don't know how severe this was. It could have been anything from her going out and partying and getting drunk to something as simple as her being nice to the fans when she's supposed to be playing heel. Who really knows? If she was in fact getting drunk or something, you could argue that she actually was practicing the gimmick outside WWE since it was in her character to have lapses in the Straight Edge lifestyle. But this is all speculation on my part. No matter what Serena did wrong, it seems like WWE is firing people for lesser and lesser offenses these days. I mean where is the job security for these people? It seems like anyone in the wrestling business except for the main eventers can be fired at the drop of a hat these days. But I digress. Serena was a promising diva. I thought she was a very attractive girl, even after she shaved her head. And the one match she did have made her look good. She did a move that was an homage to the G2S, and it looked sick. I couldn't believe they let her do a move like that in a women's match. And then suddenly, she's gone. She was a solid part of the SES, and now it looks like the stable is breaking up anyway. Oh well. I hope Serena grows her hair back and goes back to being awesome on the indy circuit. WWE could have had a great new diva on their hands, and it's unfortunate to see Serena let go so prematurely.

This could be one of the dumbest things I've ever read. Seriously being fired for being nice to fans while being a heel? They actually showed Sheamus and Miz being nice to the fans on the China tour and they're two of the biggest heels in the WWE.

Moron.


Posted By: Guest#2476 (Guest)  on September 05, 2010 at 12:47 AM

 
 
Two Things:

1) I've never understood the Rhyno hate. He may not be Kurt Angle, but he still has the best goddamn spear in the business.

2) Del Rio may have an armbar, but Jericho has about 333 of them.


Posted By: the danger stranger (Guest)  on September 05, 2010 at 01:53 AM

 
 
NO Surrender looks solid imo. And I'm not a "die hard TNA fan".

Posted By: Bill (Guest)  on September 05, 2010 at 01:57 AM

 
 
Predictable? This is TNA. And,surprisingly, I'm not saying this in a bad way. I like this about them.

Posted By: Guest#9410 (Guest)  on September 05, 2010 at 02:04 AM

 
 
Zach Brown:

You are an idiot, and it is no wonder why you don't get a column of your own around here.

Serena was fired for partying too much and getting shit-faced too much. They warned her weeks ago. She didn't listen, thus getting fired.


Posted By: Quentin (Guest)  on September 05, 2010 at 02:52 AM

 
 
As usual, who is going to BUY the TNA PPV?

Posted By: Question (Guest)  on September 05, 2010 at 02:53 AM

 
 
im thinking Jericho is done after his contract. Im also thinking this could last all the way until Mania. The next hall of Fame is rumored to be WCW based and they have yet to find that "Main Attraction" closer they have been looking for. Jericho could fit that bill perfectly since he started in Atlanta. Just saying

Posted By: Guest#2711 (Guest)  on September 05, 2010 at 03:15 AM

 
 
This could be one of the dumbest things I've ever read. Seriously being fired for being nice to fans while being a heel? They actually showed Sheamus and Miz being nice to the fans on the China tour and they're two of the biggest heels in the WWE.

Moron.

Posted By: Guest#2476 (Guest) on September 05, 2010 at 12:47 AM


Wow guy...you pick one little meaningless comment from what he was talking about and attack him on it.

Douchebag.


Posted By: hmm (Guest)  on September 05, 2010 at 03:16 AM

 
 
Serena got fired because she ignored the WWE's on air warning a while back,she was nothing special

Posted By: Guest#2989 (Guest)  on September 05, 2010 at 03:35 AM

 
 
Just thinking, if they ARE going to unify the top titles it seems to me that The Miz is the perfect candidate to do it. All they have to do is have him win the Royal Rumble and challenge the WHC. Boom, two titleshots.

Posted By: King Tony (Guest)  on September 05, 2010 at 04:17 AM

 
 
My word, it was a decent read aside from the Serena question when you were all showed up as a bit simple.

I can't believe the amount of times others and I have had to say this but here goes: Serena being sacked for partying was not related to her gimmick, but because it was excessive in general! If it had been Kelly Kelly or Tamina, or whoever, they'd have been released too! FFS are people really that stupid?


Posted By: GIMH (Guest)  on September 05, 2010 at 04:28 AM

 
 
I've said it before and I'll say it again: They need ONE major title (WWE Championship Belt), the titleholder travels between all shows because he is the champ!
Next, IC Title and US title are the top titles on Raw and Smackdown separately. Here's where it gets interesting: Those titles are listed as the number one contenders, and they can cash in a title shot, just like Money in the Bank. However, they only get one title shot. If they lose, they have to start defending the belt. If they get two successful title defenses, then they get another shot at the title. And, the champ alternates between defending against the IC champ and the US champ. So now, we have 3 automatic contenders for the title (IC champ, US champ, MITB winner), plus any feud that the champ starts with a non-title holder. This brings value to all the titles, and anyone not involved in a title chase, should be tagging to fight the tag champs. This gets everyone on the card some mat time. Good idea? Bad idea?


Posted By: Nate (Guest)  on September 05, 2010 at 05:06 AM

 
 
I like the idea of unifying the WWE and World heavyweight titles. The IC and US are practically the same thing, but it work for there to be 2 seperate mid card titles I guess.

The tag and women's titles NEEDED unification. There is no doubt about that. I think WWE has enough mid and upper mid carders for the US and IC belts they just don't seem to use them right.

Anyway I think having 5 titles in the WWE will work. Though I doubt Night of Champions will continue as a PPV maybe it'll become a special Raw then.


Posted By: Guest#1891 (Guest)  on September 05, 2010 at 07:05 AM

 
 
im thinking Jericho is done after his contract. Im also thinking this could last all the way until Mania. The next hall of Fame is rumored to be WCW based and they have yet to find that "Main Attraction" closer they have been looking for. Jericho could fit that bill perfectly since he started in Atlanta. Just saying

Posted By: Guest#2711 (Guest) on September 05, 2010 at 03:15 AM

Started in Atlanta? Wow, you are ignorant. Canadian indies, SMW and ECW WAY before WCW.


Posted By: Darren Runne (Guest)  on September 05, 2010 at 11:19 AM

 
 
I've said it before and I'll say it again: They need ONE major title (WWE Championship Belt), the titleholder travels between all shows because he is the champ!
Next, IC Title and US title are the top titles on Raw and Smackdown separately. Here's where it gets interesting: Those titles are listed as the number one contenders, and they can cash in a title shot, just like Money in the Bank. However, they only get one title shot. If they lose, they have to start defending the belt. If they get two successful title defenses, then they get another shot at the title. And, the champ alternates between defending against the IC champ and the US champ. So now, we have 3 automatic contenders for the title (IC champ, US champ, MITB winner), plus any feud that the champ starts with a non-title holder. This brings value to all the titles, and anyone not involved in a title chase, should be tagging to fight the tag champs. This gets everyone on the card some mat time. Good idea? Bad idea?

Posted By: Nate (Guest) on September 05, 2010 at 05:06 AM

Book it.


Posted By: Wiggles (Guest)  on September 05, 2010 at 11:39 AM

 
 
Having Serena gone isn't stopping anyone from watching, but I don't think partying was the whole deal. With Punk's latest weak efforts in handicap matches against Big Show, it seems he's still in the doghouse (for whatever reason this time) and this has shades of a "punishment" firing ala Sean Waltman in WCW. Probably not, but WWE management always seems against Punk.

Posted By: ThePants (Guest)  on September 05, 2010 at 12:20 PM

 
 
Two Things:

1) I've never understood the Rhyno hate. He may not be Kurt Angle, but he still has the best goddamn spear in the business.

2) Del Rio may have an armbar, but Jericho has about 333 of them.
------------------------------------
Wow, got to second this.


Posted By: NotSoHeavyD2 (Guest)  on September 05, 2010 at 02:32 PM

 
 
I doubt they'd unify the top belts, it would just make the divide between main-events and mid-carders even wider which I don't think is a good thing. The only way I would like it is if they unified the world belts and made them for RAW and unified the IC and US belt and made it for Smackdown.

Having the top belts unified and making the champ travel between both shows just means more Cena, Orton, etc... to watch.


Posted By: Guest#0744 (Guest)  on September 05, 2010 at 04:31 PM

 
 
sorry to pile on the hate, but yeah. the answers to the serena question really exposed u guys. so stupid...

Posted By: Guest#5300 (Guest)  on September 05, 2010 at 05:30 PM

 
 
I would just like to point out, Jericho did not have 333 armbars, he had 550

Posted By: Guest#7836 (Guest)  on September 05, 2010 at 06:40 PM

 
 
Morons just morons. Writing commenting whatever.

1 For anyone who still doesnt know the reason Alberto Del Rio is far advanced beyond the NXT rookies is that unlike everyone of them excpet AmDrag and Kaval he is not a rookie and quite accomplished in Mexico.

2 Serena had a really bad mixed tag that was tough to stick with or stay awake through. Kelly Kelly is just ok in the ring certainly not the worst but Gallows and Serena suck so you had Show caring all four of them. Nobobdy in the IWC would have given two shits about Serena or Gallows for that matter because he is on his 3rd gimmick in four years and he still sucks, if they werent associated with Punk.

3 I m originally from the Chicago area but CM Punk is overated and is a huge asshole in real life and you can see how much of an arrogant prick he is on WWE Dvds where he comments prior to his HEEL turn.

3rd CM Punk not ever taking a pinfall in any of these handicap matches does NOT qualify as a burial or depush. He has yet to eat the pin. When he does it is to a MAIN EVENTER and a 7 foot one at that. Compared to his 5'10 ass.


Posted By: Radtke (Guest)  on September 05, 2010 at 06:53 PM

 
 
I liked the questions this week.

Posted By: Tim (Guest)  on September 06, 2010 at 03:38 AM

 
 
I think an Undisputed title match would be a big deal, and with Money In The Bank, it could EASILY become 'disputed' again on any given night. Cena (obviously) becomes undisputed champion, defends it on tv a few times and after a PPV title defence, Miz cashes in the briefcase to win the WWE/World Title.

Posted By: Guest#1734 (Guest)  on September 06, 2010 at 09:21 AM

 
 
End the brand split! Please. Cena vs Taker at WM to unify the titles. So many wasted single guys can form tag teams. Reinvigorate the tag team division. Everybody allowed on Raw, Smackdown, Superstars.

Posted By: Ryan Haseldine (Guest)  on September 06, 2010 at 11:48 AM

 
 
Zach Brown: This isn't the first, and it definitely won't be the last, but I think this was an unwarranted firing on WWE's part. Not living the gimmick? Really? I don't know how severe this was. It could have been anything from her going out and partying and getting drunk to something as simple as her being nice to the fans when she's supposed to be playing heel. Who really knows? If she was in fact getting drunk or something, you could argue that she actually was practicing the gimmick outside WWE since it was in her character to have lapses in the Straight Edge lifestyle. But this is all speculation on my part. No matter what Serena did wrong, it seems like WWE is firing people for lesser and lesser offenses these days. I mean where is the job security for these people? It seems like anyone in the wrestling business except for the main eventers can be fired at the drop of a hat these days. But I digress. Serena was a promising diva. I thought she was a very attractive girl, even after she shaved her head. And the one match she did have made her look good. She did a move that was an homage to the G2S, and it looked sick. I couldn't believe they let her do a move like that in a women's match. And then suddenly, she's gone. She was a solid part of the SES, and now it looks like the stable is breaking up anyway. Oh well. I hope Serena grows her hair back and goes back to being awesome on the indy circuit. WWE could have had a great new diva on their hands, and it's unfortunate to see Serena let go so prematurely.

This could be one of the dumbest things I've ever read. Seriously being fired for being nice to fans while being a heel? They actually showed Sheamus and Miz being nice to the fans on the China tour and they're two of the biggest heels in the WWE.

Moron.

Posted By: Guest#2476 (Guest) on September 05, 2010 at 12:47 AM

Hey, didn't the Undertaker get married a few months ago, while he was suppose to be in a "Vegitative State"? Why does he still have a job? Because he's the Undertaker? What Bullshit! Not living the gimmick is a horrible reason to fire someone.

In my honest opinion I think they were going to get rid of her anyway. They prolly realized that she was disposable storyline wise, and the drinking was a storyline to take her off tv and get rid of her. Really, what did she add? She wrestled once, and while she may have brought a little to the gimmick, the gimmick was not and is not going to die without her.


Posted By: JWestmoreland (Guest)  on September 06, 2010 at 11:29 PM

 


www.41mania.com
Copyright (c) 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.