www.411mania.com
|  News |  Columns |  TV Reports |  Video Reviews |  Title History |  Hall of Fame |  News Report |  The Dunn List |
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// Irina Shayk Shows Off Her Killer Curves At Cannes
MUSIC
// Kanye West and Jay-Z's Watch the Throne 2 Confirmed
WRESTLING
// Brooke Hogan Says Hulk Didn't Know She Was in Talks With TNA
POLITICS
// Obama Leads In Florida, Ohio, & VIrginia
MMA
// 411's MMA Roundtable - UFC 146: Dos Santos vs. Mir
GAMES
// Castlevania: Lords of Shadow Sequel Teased


 HOT TOPICS
//  CM Punk
//  John Cena
//  Triple H
//  Hulk Hogan
//  Randy Orton
//  Christian
SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds





Follow 411mania on Twitter!




Add 411 On Facebook
 



 
 411mania » Wrestling » Columns



Advertisement
411 Fact or Fiction 01.12.12: Funkasaurus, Jericho, Nash vs. Warrior, More
Posted by Steve Cook on 01.12.2012





Hi, hello & welcome to Fact or Fiction! I'm Steve Cook, and it's been a funky week in the world of wrestling! Of course, the funk was brought by the Funkasaurus himself, Brodus Clay! Some love it, some hate it. The same goes for Chris Jericho's continuing storyline where he just can't bring himself to address his adoring fans. There's split opinion on whether or not Daniel Bryan should be the one turning heel in his feud with Big Show. There's also been debate about the WWE Network, Jeff Hardy, Rob Van Dam & the Kevin Nash vs. Ultimate Warrior saga. Also, TNA is going to England.

I've invited two of 411's finest to discuss these topics. First of all, a man who's new to our website and has brought us The 8-Ball, a weekly column listing the top eight in various wrestling topics…please welcome Ross Rutherford!

His opponent is the co-host of The Greg DeMarco Show With Greg DeMarco & Patrick O'Dowd, presented by 411Mania and streaming worldwide through the Voice of Choice Nation…say hello to the Wrestling Realist, Patrick O'Dowd!

  • Questions were sent out Monday.

  • Participants were told to expect WWE, TNA & crazy people MMA-related questions.

    1. You are intrigued by Brodus "The Funkasaurus" Clay.





    Ross Rutherford: FACT. I know everyone thinks it looks cheesy and that it won't get him anywhere, but I think if done right it might get over. This is only bearing in mind that they don't turn him into some blatant Rikishi rip off. If they make his character interesting I think it will work. If you look at some of his facial expression he legitimately looks crazy. Maybe if they turn him into some type of obsessive dancing mad man? I don't know, I think it is too early to tell where they are going with this and whether it is a good or bad move, but it does have my attention.

    Patrick O‘Dowd: FACT. Many people have been arguing that Brodus was being built as a dominant super heavyweight and that is how he should have debuted. With the E already pushing two such monsters in Mark Henry and Kane, there seems little reason to have yet another tearing his way through the ranks. The second I heard "Somebody Call My Momma" playing I was instantly smiling. More importantly I was curious about where this could go. Watching Brodus in his jumpsuit with his ladies I was transported to memories of the Godfather and Dancing Rikishi. The man worked the gimmick hard and it definitely appeared like he was enjoying himself. I think there is a great deal of fun to be had with Clay's character as it is a complete 180 from my expectations. I am not sure where this angle/character will go, but I know I am going to be entertained watching it unfold.

    Score: 1 for 1

    2. Chris Jericho will finally be able to speak next week on Raw.



    Ross Rutherford: FICTION. I don't mind either way. I have a feeling he is going to keep toying with us up until the Royal Rumble. The way I see it, regardless of when he decides to finally say something, this angle is going in an interesting direction. I'm sure I'm with a large majority that is hoping this leads to a Punk/Jericho angle for Wrestlemania. I could be wrong though, but this isn't Jericho's first rodeo and he would not have returned so soon if he didn't have something new to add to his persona. It would be nice to see Jericho put Punk over at Wrestlemania and I think they could steal the show from Rock/Cena if they got time to work. I'm most interested to see if Jericho is playing a heel or a babyface. My gut says he will be playing a heel, but Jericho is fairly good at swerving us. Who knows? Either way, I can't wait to see what he does next.

    Patrick O‘Dowd: FICTION. I think I am saying fiction because I am digging the silent treatment so far. Clearly, the man is overwhelmed by the fan response. In all seriousness, the audience is still reacting to his antics and the silence, so why not keep it going? The purpose of this is to build tension so that when he finally does speak, the fan reaction will be huge. It seems to me that Jericho is going to eventually call us out as the sheep that we are for blindly cheering his return. The longer he can get folks to cheer for his antics the better the fodder will be when he finally does talk. I think that he can string this out for one more week at least and get the audience to the point where we are begging for him to talk to us, and we will love it when he then drops a verbal beatdown.

    Score: 2 for 2

    3. Daniel Bryan is better off as a heel than as a babyface.



    Ross Rutherford: FACT. I'm saying fact for the simple logic that it is far easier for young guys to get over as heels. The last time I remember a young guy (really) getting over as a face was Jeff Hardy. That took years. Daniel Bryan can pull off either I'm sure. I have not seen much of his ROH work, but I've been told he played a brilliant heel. It works with the storyline too. The Big Show is the bigger and dominate wrestler and Bryan uses any cheap method he can to get a victory. It makes perfect sense, and being that Bryan is a smaller wrestler it is believable from him to play the weasley heel, although to be honest I'd much rather see him making people tap out left and right. I suppose Smackdown needs a top heel with Mark Henry and Christian injured for the time being, so I suppose this is their way of trying to fill the void. As long as he is putting on good matches I really don't feel a need to complain.

    Patrick O‘Dowd: FACT. I have said this many times on the Greg DeMarco Show (shameless plug!), but my favorite times watching Daniel Bryan work have been when he is acting as a heel. If fans are unfamiliar, take a look at Daniel Bryan's work during his Championship run with ROH. During his time as Ring of Honor World Champion, Bryan took a turn as this smug, "I don't do this for the fans" persona. His best antics were when he would get the crow excited for a particular move (many times he would be setting up the surfboard), then flip the crowd of and stop his opponent instead. He can do the chickens### heel stuff as well. During the ROH/CZW Cage of Death match he intentionally turned and attacked Samoa Joe and ran out on ROH because he wanted to protect his title. Having him play the cowardly heel against the Big Show makes a lot of sense to me because I think it makes Bryan a little more credible as the champ. I hate face underdog champions because many times the champ comes off looking like he isn't talented enough to have the belt and is just lucky. Look at Rey Mysterio's first title reign. We were supposed to buy Rey as an underdog, but most just saw him as weak and lucky. As a cowardly heel Bryan can play up the idea that shouldn't be the champ and is now going to whatever he can to hold the belt. There is real potential in that angle.

    Score: 3 for 3

    4. WWE Network delaying its debut until the end of the year is a good decision and not a sign that the project ultimately won't work.



    Ross Rutherford: FACT. People have such little faith. Vince McMahon is the greatest business man to ever come into the wrestling world. Could this be a flop? Yes. However, I think by putting off its debut they have realized that if they want this to work they will have to fully dedicate themselves to it. McMahon is smart, and I'm not sure he would take a gamble like this unless he was sure it would pay off. This is definitely something that we will have to wait and see on. For right now, my interest is not on the WWE Network. Do I think they will benefit from their own network? I'm not sure. No wrestling promotion has ever dreamed of trying to pull off something like this on a large scale. McMahon is in untested waters, but he had made a career out of doing this.

    Patrick O‘Dowd: FACT. I am going to own up front, that I know very little about what is actually happening with the why's behind the WWE Network's delay, but I refuse to immediately jump to the idea that the delay is sign of the project's failure. The WWE clearly has put a great deal of effort behind this project and hyped it to the moon. I am going to err on the side that says the WWE doesn't want to see this go the way of the XFL. The delay is an effort to avoid failure, not evidence that it already has failed. If the Network isn't quite ready, then take the time to work out those snags and debut strong. The worst thing that could happen is for the network to debut and see problems be it technical or otherwise.

    Score: 4 for 4


    SWITCH!


    5. Keeping Jeff Hardy in the TNA title picture is a wise decision.



    Patrick O‘Dowd: FACT. So long as James Storm is feuding with Kurt Angle, then having Jeff Hardy in the title picture is fine by me. Bobby Roode pulled a nice little cowardly heel move of his own to retain his title which was right on target with his character development, so there is still a story there for Jeff. I know I've been fooled by Jeff before, but I have really appreciated his redemption story arc. He and Roode worked a very solid match at Genesis and if Jeff's act truly is together, let them keep working together until Storm and Angle blow off their rivalry.

    Ross Rutherford: FACT. Jeff Hardy, whether we like him as a person or not, is over with the fans. So if Bobby Roode is able to benefit off of going over him then great. I don't think it would be a good move by TNA's part to actually give him the title right now after what he pulled last year. I actually hope they don't give him any title for a long time. TNA doesn't need any more bad press, but Hardy knows how to have a good match and it doesn't bother me in the slightest to see him working main events again. I think Jeff is fully aware that he is on his last straw. I hope he sees how his brother has been more or less ostracized by TNA and WWE and realizes that he needs to make this next run count. I hope he keeps on the straight and narrow and proves all of his harsh critics wrong. I've always been a fan of Hardy's ability to delight the crowd, but over the past few years I have not enjoyed his work. I hope he hits his stride again and is able to work amazing matches again.

    Score: 5 for 5

    6. TNA should hold more events in England.



    Patrick O‘Dowd: FACT. By all accounts, TNA does quite well in England and the company has a strong fan base there. Taping Impact in a location other than Orlando, with an international fanbase that is invested in your product, can only make the company look more professional. One of the chief complaints surrounding TNA is the Impact Zone audience. Change that and go somewhere with some fan investment.

    Ross Rutherford: FACT. TNA, for whatever reason, is really big in the UK. I think if they worked a PPV over there, like Slammiversary or Bound For Glory, that they would be able to attract a sizably larger crowd than they usually get here in the states. I don't understand why WWE doesn't do this more often either. Wrestling is huge in other counties and if American promoters held more events in places like India, Mexico, Japan, and the UK they would be able to widen their audience and open up new business opportunities over there. I'm aware that both companies tour the other countries, but holding a TV taping or a PPV would be a huge deal for foreigners and I think the American viewers would be interested in seeing how others across the World react to the American talents.

    Score: 6 for 6

    7. Rob Van Dam would be an effective member of the WWE roster.



    Patrick O‘Dowd: FACT. Fact only if RVD is motivated, and that was one of the reasons he stopped working for the WWE in the first place. RVD may have lost a step, but it isn't that big of a step. And with the roster that is currently working prominently on Raw and SmackDown there could be some killer matchups. I would love to see CM Punk and RVD, or RVD and Ziggler, RVD and Cody Rhodes, and so on and so on… RVD has always been a versatile worker that can work with high flyers as well as big men. I haven't seen much to show me that he couldn't be effective. But, as I mentioned above, Rob is most effective when he is motivated.

    Ross Rutherford: FACT. This is an odd question. When Van Dam is enjoying what he is doing I think he could be an effective member of any roster. I honestly don't think he likes TNA. I think he is over it and wants to either go back home or maybe have one final run with the WWE. Van Damn's last run with the WWE was held down by his drug arrest and the fact that he was more or less chained to the limited ECW brand. I think if he came back he would be able to work with a ton of the new guys and do them a lot of good. Van Dam vs. Dolph Ziggler? Van Dam vs. Cody Rhodes? Van Dam vs. Daniel Bryan? I think they all sound like good matches and interesting feuds. So my simple answer is yes, but you can't ever tell what RVD is going to do next. Based on his performances in TNA recently he seems burnt out with the promotion. I hope he gets out of whatever funk he has been in, though.

    Score: 7 for 7

    8. You want to see Ultimate Warrior vs. Kevin Nash in an MMA fight.



    Patrick O‘Dowd: FICTION. You couldn't pay me to watch that fight. This twitter war of words is just that, words. I don't care if these guys do want to kill each other. Who knows what kind of shape warrior is in? And Nash, while looking decent during his WWE run, seems to have forgotten that the last fight he was in was a work. And that is what I think this war of words is. It's a work. The second Nash Tweets that he's shooting, he is no longer shooting. He's using the word to garner attention and he has succeeded because here we are now typing about Nash and Warrior. Both of these men love attention and publicity, this is the last I am going to look at the situation.

    Ross Rutherford: FICTION. Who does? These old guys really need to stop shit talking on Twitter. Its getting really old. I mean Nash reminds me of a tree that you can tell is about to fall over. His legs just constantly look like that they are ready to snap. I don't even want to comment on the Ultimate Warrior. I think this is retarded, and I don't want to see it at all. I mean seriously, who cares? Ultimate Warrior is (and forgive me 80s WWF fans because I know you are going to hate me) a has-been and no more than a flash in the pan. There I said it…do your worst.

    Final Score: 8 for 8

    Ross & Patrick run the table, achieving a perfect score of agreeance! Do you agree with them? I'm sure there are some people out there hating on the Funkasaurus & mute Jericho. Surely somebody doesn't think it's a good idea to put Jeff Hardy in the TNA title scene. Oh well, we thank Ross & Phil Patrick for their contributions, and congratulate them on achieving the first perfect score in the Cook Era of Fact or Fiction! Join us next week when two more literary warriors enter the Fact or Fiction ring!

  • Remember to go to TigerFlashGames.com and play addictive, free flash games when you're bored at work, school, or whenever!

  • Don't forget 411 on Facebook & Twitter!

    Post Comment (66)  |  Email Steve Cook  |  View Steve Cook's 411 Profile

      Send To Friend  |    Stumble It!  |    Digg It!  | 



    Please add your comment below.
    If you are registered, you can login and post under your registered name. If not, you can post as a guest or register.

    * Please note that 411 moderates all comments. Your comment will show up on the site after it has been approved by an editor.
     
    Name : 
    Comment : 
    Remaining Characters : 
    2800
     

    Comments (66)

     
    its nice that brodus has this gimmick. and i can see him in the near future turning heel and ending this gimmick once mark henry retires.

    Posted By: Guest#7015 (Guest)  on January 11, 2012 at 11:14 PM

     
     
    There was skit on SNL. A Cee Lo Green parody, and they had a character in that Skit named Funkasaurus.

    Brodus Clay's character is a rip off from that.


    Posted By: lodog (Guest)  on January 11, 2012 at 11:30 PM

     
     
    Whoa. That Brodus "The Funkasaurus" Clay video looked like Dusty Rhodes and Perez Hilton had a baby. Not good.

    I love me some Dusty, bay-beez...but I don't know, I do think Clay would of gotten over better as a bad ass heel.


    Posted By: Dr. X (Guest)  on January 11, 2012 at 11:32 PM

     
     
    Patrick O'Dork is a terrible writer.

    Posted By: Guest#2617 (Guest)  on January 11, 2012 at 11:32 PM

     
     
    Warrior could kill Nash...literally

    Posted By: Guest#6864 (Guest)  on January 11, 2012 at 11:50 PM

     
     
    Yawn...

    Steve Cook has not only killed 411's credibility with introducing a certain new "writer," but he has now effectively destroyed Fact or Fiction.

    Congrats Cook! How long until Larry has to "save" this feature, like he did with the 4 R's?


    Posted By: Guest#3206 (Guest)  on January 11, 2012 at 11:51 PM

     
     
    I like the dancing monster face Brodus Clay! Anybody who thinks there should be 3 no nonsense monster heels in one Fed is a retard!

    Posted By: Who (Guest)  on January 11, 2012 at 11:53 PM

     
     
    These were the easiest FoF questions ever. I agreed with both Ross and Patrick on all eight questions.

    Posted By: Guest#3206 (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 12:00 AM

     
     
    Yea, Brodus can drop that gimmick at any time and be taken seriously. This gives him time to gain experience without being rushed into anything important.

    Posted By: mello yello enthusiast (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 12:52 AM

     
     
    There was skit on SNL. A Cee Lo Green parody, and they had a character in that Skit named Funkasaurus.

    Brodus Clay's character is a rip off from that.

    Posted By: lodog (Guest) on January 11, 2012 at 11:30 PM

    Charlie Day was called Freakasaurus and dressed up like a dinosaur. Pretty much NOTHING like what Brodus did. Fucking douche.


    Posted By: Oh My! (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 01:00 AM

     
     
    England does not = UK. Get it through your heads.

    Posted By: Guest#1539 (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 01:07 AM

     
     
    Warrior vs Nash would be the most entertaining match on the card if it ever happened. Think Goldberg/Lesnar, the most talked about match from Wrestlemania XX. Trainwrecks can be awesome.

    Posted By: Guest#7434 (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 01:24 AM

     
     
    "Yawn...

    Steve Cook has not only killed 411's credibility with introducing a certain new "writer," but he has now effectively destroyed Fact or Fiction.

    Congrats Cook! How long until Larry has to "save" this feature, like he did with the 4 R's?

    Posted By: Guest#3206 (Guest) on January 11, 2012 at 11:51 PM"

    Why do people claim that things they don't like have lost "credibility," and that their opinions are the same as the entire IWC?

    It's alright to have an opinion; it's even better to know how to separate that opinion from fact. You're not the Voice of Legion, speaking for everyone and letting 411mania know how much or little credibility it has.

    Hate to target you, but I just saw that post as a microcosm of the IWC's worst stereotypes being reinforced.

    Great column, fellas. I don't mind the 8 for 8 finish. It's kinda funny; after seeing so many contrarians on the site disagree for the sake of disagreeing, and so many pairings of people we KNOW are at odds on everything, it's become the norm. Now, seeing two people actually agree on something is the breath of fresh air (or "it's different, now it sucks," if you wanna be negative about it).


    Posted By: E. E. Faulk (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 01:40 AM

     
     
    The only way I can get on board with Brodus Clay after Monday is if each week it's a new character of some sort... I guess kinda like Charlie Haas did, but then most would moan.

    Posted By: Sephiroth (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 01:59 AM

     
     
    i always want to see the warrior step into the ring, i stopped watching wrestling when he left because it's boring without him & savage, andre,boss man, hogan etc, those guys is wrestling & without them there is nothing in my eyes, at least i got me legends of wrestle mania & superstars but nothing would beat seeing the warrior return even at his age just makes it more motivational other than that like millions of others my age, i won't even say my age because my 8 year old son loves the warrior, we still watch that & then we play, the man's name gets mentioned in my house several times a day by my sons friends, my friends & me & i'm down here in south africa, people want to see warrior return to the wrestling scene & see him wrestle kevin nash, hulk hogan, whoever but he must win because he's the ultimate warrior the best wrestler ever & that's something no one can ever change

    Posted By: Guest#9135 (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 02:04 AM

     
     
    1. Fact - I thought it was stupid when he first came out. Having never seen him before, I thought "this is the brutal monster that people have been hyping?" As the match progressed, I got drawn in by how he talked to his opponent. I'm surprised no one on commentary brought up the similarity to how Dusty Rhodes would get a groove going in the ring like that. I'm interested in seeing where he goes from here.

    2. Who cares? Fans of Jericho's new character are as pretentious as fans of Arrested Development. The moment you say you don't like it, their reaction is that you're just too stupid to "get it." Well, I do "get it," and I think it sucks. I pity the fans in the arena that have to sit through that shit and can't leave the room or turn the channel like I did. I love Jericho, but I hate the new character so far.

    3. Fact - Bryan has shown before how effective and brutal he is as a heel.

    4. Fact - It's better to have all your shit together than do something like this half-assed. TNA should learn that lesson.

    5. Fact-ish - If Hardy is clean and is showing up on time for appearances, then use him. He's a money-maker. The question should be moot, though, as he should have been fired for his last offense (along with anyone that thought it was OK to let him go out in that condition).

    6. Don't care

    7. Fiction. RVD would come in, get reminded of how bad Vince screwed up his idea to relaunch ECW, and would lose all motivation again. He might put on some good matches while there, but that wasn't the question.

    8. FICTION - I don't use Twitter. If I had to rely on "news" articles mentioning it for my view of what the service is, I'd say it was the latest venue for famous people to act like high school bitches. Nash and Warrior are certainly living up to that description. Nash, I know it can be entertaining to make fun of / harass the mentally incompetent / insane, but the trick is to not let yourself be dragged down to their level. Please learn that lesson before your next "twitter war."


    Posted By: Scott B (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 02:09 AM

     
     
    Glad somebody else enjoyed the Brodus debut. I was smiling the whole time.

    Posted By: Guest#0292 (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 02:43 AM

     
     
    id rather see nash-warrior in a real fight anyday over cena-rock, and i firmly believe most other people would too

    Posted By: iwould (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 03:00 AM

     
     
    Brodus Clay the wrestler has a lot of potential, I can admit that. Brodus Clay the dancer has none. He is much different from Rikishi and Godfather in that he can't actually dance a lick. If he was brought in as a gigantic Tazz-like suplex machine who can actually wrestle with athletic ability in the way that guys like Kane and Mark Henry can't, then I'd be excited about it. It would be far easier to promote him as a legitimate threat to any opponent that way. But he doesn't have the natural charisma or the dancing ability to get people behind him like other dancin' fools have in the past. Sorry, but this just won't work.

    Posted By: Jay (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 03:12 AM

     
     
    Ross Rutherford: FICTION. Who does? These old guys really need to stop shit talking on Twitter.

    Dude, who are you to say that anybody needs to stop anything? Do you remember that little nice concept called freedom of speech? Don't read and don't comment if you don't bother. Maybe it's a sign of times that there are so many battles of words on the net, but the sad thing is it's often funnier than so many wrestling shows, you might hate these veterans or not but both big Kev and Warrior are big characters in this biz and for that alone there will always be people talking about their comments. Heck, they give you more excuses than you already create to talk shit about them, something you IWC guys love so much.


    Posted By: Max (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 04:49 AM

     
     
    "The last time I remember a young guy (really) getting over as a face was Jeff Hardy."

    Zack Ryder?


    Posted By: DarthDaver (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 05:49 AM

     
     
    "TNA, for whatever reason, is really big in the UK."

    Erm, sorry, no it isn't. It is virtually unknown over here.


    Posted By: DarthDaver (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 05:55 AM

     
     
    Brodus Clay is a shit worker. He's far too green and he lacks genuine talent. Had he been used as a monster, he LITERALLY would have been pushed for his size and odd body shape alone. Under those conditions, the monster heel gimmick only goes so far.

    Umaga anyone? Umaga got stale and they canned his ass (Though other factors were at play too) and he was ten times the worker Brodus Clay is.

    This is a chance for Brodus to stand out and be something different. The goofball character also plays to his lack of in ring talent. Not a bad thing at all for his career. If he improves in the ring enough to where he can carry of being a dominant heel, a gimmick change is as easy as pie...


    Posted By: RobMinion (Registered)  on January 12, 2012 at 06:42 AM

     
     
    Jeff Hardy is on his last strike. If he fucks up TNA should do what they did to Matt and just fire him and never look back and since TNA has been good he's not really needed.

    I was so happy to read that TNA is going to have impact tapings in the UK. I just hope they don't do a huge title switch because Robert Roode is a great heel in his "do anything to keep the title" character.

    Jericho probably isn't going to talk until he gets booed every time he comes out the he'll unleash hell.

    RVD boy what can I say. What a let down in TNA he's been. He'll have some great matches here and there but most of the time on Impact he's going through the motions. It is that reason why I don't think he'll be a good asset to the WWE roster.

    But from my understanding RVD doesn't like the travel schedule so unless he's doing some legends deal I don't see him returning.


    Posted By: Guest#8051 (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 06:44 AM

     
     
    Hi! I'm 2 Cold Scorpio's WWE gimmick. Remember me?

    I didn't think so.

    =(


    Posted By: Flash Funk (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 07:13 AM

     
     
    You know if warrior / nash ever happend these smart marks would be watching. Another great piece of wrestling journalism by 15 year olds.

    Posted By: jimbo jones (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 07:43 AM

     
     
    Nash v Warrior would be hilarious to watch!

    Posted By: Guest#6896 (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 08:11 AM

     
     
    "TNA, for whatever reason, is really big in the UK"

    No, it isn't. Don't buy Wes Kirk's nonsense. TNA does ok ratings on a minor cable channel, and sells tickets reasonably well because there are a lot of UK wrestling fans who don't often get to see live wrestling of a decent standard.

    But it is not a big deal. You won't see people with TNA t-shirts walking down the street. If I asked 100 of my fellow Brits what TNA was I'd guess 99 would just look at me blankly, as apposed to everyone having heard of WWE.


    Posted By: Guest#1587 (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 08:34 AM

     
     
    I think the important thing about BC becoming the Funkasaurus is that it gives fans a way to remember him other than another "I'm big and mad" wrestler. I think that's the biggest problem new wrestlers have. They don't have a "hook" to make fans remember them. They tend to be generic. You can always tweak or change a character down the road, but if the fans don't give a shit, what good does it do?

    As for Nash and Warrior. I'd love to see them have a real fight. I wouldn't pay for it but I'd love to see it.


    Posted By: The Big Fat F*g (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 08:35 AM

     
     
    England does not = UK. Get it through your heads.

    Posted By: Guest#1539 (Guest) on January 12, 2012 at 01:07 AM

    Im a Londoner through and through and can say that England does not = the UK, however England was always a term that could be interchangable with the UK... besides who cares about the Welsh and Scottish. So to me yep England = UK is acceptable.


    Posted By: Matt (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 08:43 AM

     
     
    I think the Funkasaurus gimmick is a nice swerve and not many saw it coming. After all you can only have so many monster heels at a time, not to mention at any point they could have Brodus use this as some kind of fuel for a heel turn.

    Moving to Daniel Bryan, I think he can be a good heel especially against Show. However I personally dont want to see another underdog weasel heel. Both Miz and Del Rio done so lately, as has Christian... I definitely would want to see a Tap or Snap Bryan in the WWE


    Posted By: Just Lil Me (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 08:59 AM

     
     
    Any chance that Brodus Clay comes back next week with a different gimmick? Have him run through all of the stereotypical gimmicks the WWE/WWF have given black wrestlers over the years?

    - Godfather
    - Umaga
    - JYD
    - Koko B Ware
    - Farooq

    And the last one being Booker T. The have him do a shoot promo on how the WWE has poorly portrayed black wrestlers over the years. They even ran an angle where HHH acted in a racist way towards Booker T, and in the end, HHH won that angle. And yet, Booker T is now back kissing HHH's ass.


    Posted By: SpankyHamm (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 09:29 AM

     
     
    I love the new Brodus Clay. He reminds me of the way Bob Sapp used to come to the ring in japan. Fun before the match, but when that bell rings it’s all business. Just go to youtube and type in Bob Sapp vs The Great Muta pt.1 and you will see what I mean.

    Posted By: Guest#7136 (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 09:37 AM

     
     
    Its kills me, if Clay had debuted as the same old Monster heel tearing through nobodys for two months everyone would be bitching and hating on the guy. Finally WWE totally thought out of the box and people want the same shit force feed to them. Your idiots, this Funkasaurus angle is awesome.

    Posted By: Callmymomma (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 09:59 AM

     
     
    all u have to do with nash is leg kick him 2-3 times, hes done..

    and that picture of them at the end is awesome!


    Posted By: wylun (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 10:05 AM

     
     
    The only way I can get on board with Brodus Clay after Monday is if each week it's a new character of some sort... I guess kinda like Charlie Haas did, but then most would moan.

    Posted By: Sephiroth (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 01:59 AM

    So... the only way you're on board with a big guy with a unique look and good skill is if he takes the colorful character he's been given to help him stand out and ditches it every week, until they're out of ideas and he's held in reserve as a jobber.

    Sometimes wrestling fans don't understand wrestling very well.

    Charlie Haas' character was a novelty act that was entertaining, but did him no favors as nobody cared about Charlie Haas. Had they actually given him something to work with like "Funkasaurus," who knows.

    This character is good for Clay, I think, because he essentially got himself over just by being Del Rio's bodyguard. He has everything going for him and a fun gimmick to work with to help him move to upper mid-card. Of course, I still believe the only way you really break into the main event is as a heel, there's nothing stopping him from doing that either.


    Posted By: Guest#4050 (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 10:24 AM

     
     
    I can get not agreeing with why WWE doesn't hold PPV's oversees, but not getting it? Two words Time Zone. WWE's largest, highest paying audience is in North America. They want a prime time audience, because that's the largest number of buys. To get a 7pm start time in NY would mean a 1am start in England and that means it starts at 4pm on the West Coast.

    Let's say they went for a 9pm start time in England. That's 4pm on the east coast and 1pm on the west coast of the US. From Sept-Jan that would just be suicide due to football. During the rest of the year, it's still up against other sports that will hold special Sunday day games. Also take into account that weekend days are the only times most people have to get errands and work around the house done.

    I amazes me how people think their the first person to have such an idea. Do you really think WWE hasn't considered this sort of thing and done a cost analysis on it?

    I'd agree that TNA would probably have little to lose on this sort of thing since their PPV buys are virtually non-existent. I just don't know what the PPV business or equivalent is like in England.


    Posted By: Carl (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 10:38 AM

     
     
    The UK is starved for live wrestling - it seldom happens, which is why crowds seem so appreciative.

    I;d go, but I'd feel like a paedophile going to effectively a kids show - it would be like going to see a live stage version of Sesame Street.


    Posted By: Loki (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 11:07 AM

     
     
    There's no reason the Funkasarus can't be an asskicking monster too. His style hasn't changed. If he starts wrestling like a clown (like Santino), then I'll be worried. Prediction: Funkasaurus teams with R Truth and greatness results.

    Nash vs Warrior would be perversely entertaining. It wouldn't be any good, mind you. But it would still be fun.


    Posted By: Dr Insanity (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 11:12 AM

     
     
    Brodus Clay is a shit worker. He's far too green and he lacks genuine talent.

    Posted By: RobMinion (Registered) on January 12, 2012 at 06:42 AM

    Hmmm, well considering he wrestled about 5 times on TV and has been off camera for a couple months, my question to you is, where have you been catching all his matches at?


    Posted By: LOSER (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 11:57 AM

     
     
    Can't wait for the Funkasaurus & Cobra Connection!

    Posted By: Lil Greggy (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 12:03 PM

     
     
    England does not = UK. Get it through your heads.

    Posted By: Guest#1539 (Guest) on January 12, 2012 at 01:07 AM

    Im a Londoner through and through and can say that England does not = the UK, however England was always a term that could be interchangable with the UK... besides who cares about the Welsh and Scottish. So to me yep England = UK is acceptable.

    Posted By: Matt (Guest) on January 12, 2012 at 08:43 AM

    I read this with an English accent, and I am not English...


    Posted By: Guest#5995 (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 12:10 PM

     
     
    There was skit on SNL. A Cee Lo Green parody, and they had a character in that Skit named Funkasaurus.

    Brodus Clay's character is a rip off from that.

    Posted By: lodog (Guest)

    George Clinton. Parliament. Educate yourself.


    Posted By: lesson from da mothership (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 12:26 PM

     
     
    Brodus Clay the wrestler has a lot of potential, I can admit that. Brodus Clay the dancer has none. He is much different from Rikishi and Godfather in that he can't actually dance a lick. If he was brought in as a gigantic Tazz-like suplex machine who can actually wrestle with athletic ability in the way that guys like Kane and Mark Henry can't, then I'd be excited about it. It would be far easier to promote him as a legitimate threat to any opponent that way. But he doesn't have the natural charisma or the dancing ability to get people behind him like other dancin' fools have in the past. Sorry, but this just won't work.

    Posted By: Jay (Guest) on January 12, 2012 at 03:12 AM

    Who said his gimmick was dancing like Rikishi? Nobody. And the Godfather?? The dude didn't dance. The fact that you say he has no charisma makes me question whether you even WATCHED the match on Sunday. Talking to the crowd, Hawkins, calling his moves, moving like Dusty...the idea seems to fit him quite nicely. And can still be a bad motherfucker. Get over your expectations and enjoy.


    Posted By: Erik... (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 12:47 PM

     
     
    Okay, long time WWE/F fan (some 30+ years) and when Brodus first came out from under the Tron, I was 'WTF?', and ready to write him off.

    2 minutes later, seeing how he embraced his character, ran with it, had fun with it, I was sold, and am now a fan.

    The LAST thing the WWE needs is another 'I'm big and angry' guy like Bill Demott some 6 years ago or whatever. BORING, never cared ONE second for that guy.

    But Brodus made me interested in him just by embracing his gimmick, and making it his own. The 'my bad' and other various little touches he did during the match just made a jobber squash actually FUN to watch.

    'bad' gimmicks CAN get over, and have longevity if the guy in question takes ownership and embraces it. Two of my fave 'bad' gimmicks were Akeem and Repo Man. I just watched Repo in the 92 Rumble yesterday, and he was GREAT how he always 'snuck around' when he moved. He took that stupid gimmick and made it WORK (in my view), much like Akeem did with his jive hand movements and shucking & jiving walk to the ring.

    If Brodus can do the same, he'll be all right (or better).

    Frankly, if it fails/fizzles out, Brodus can always come out one day and say that the gimmick was forced on him by 'Big Johnie' and immediately become an ass kicking face/villain to get back at John Laurenitis for 'sticking him with a crap gimmick'.

    Go with it Brodus, you have me entertained!


    Posted By: Brian in Vancouver (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 12:47 PM

     
     
    Column this week should have been called Funk't or Fiction.

    Posted By: SpankyHamm (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 12:58 PM

     
     
    Brodus' new gimmick is a good idea. Let's be honest. How many times has a new big guy squashed jobbers, squashed the mid card, got a sniff of the main event, finally lost a match, and was never the same again? Almost none of them ever stick around. Giving Brodus a goofy gimmick while still being a strong wrestler gives him a chance at longevity and it damned sure makes him unique in today's landscape. It may be silly but it's the best longterm investment for him.


    As far as Jeff Hardy goes, I don't see how keeping in the main event is a good idea. He clearly doesn't deserve it. The fans respond to him? Yes, the hardcore TNA fans do. The mainstream doesn't due to his history. He's tainted. It makes it easier for people to not take TNA seriously.

    As far as his redemption storyline goes it's impossible to buy. You want Jeff to redeem himself? Then don't put him in the main event less than a year after he gave TNA it's biggest black eye. Make him work his way up the card and earn respect from people other than loyalists who will cheer him regardless.

    Jeff Hardy being in the World title picture at this time is only a good idea if you have an incredibly myopic viewpoint.


    Posted By: Ron Mexico (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 01:22 PM

     
     
    Im a Londoner through and through and can say that England does not = the UK, however England was always a term that could be interchangable with the UK... besides who cares about the Welsh and Scottish. So to me yep England = UK is acceptable.

    Posted By: Matt (Guest) on January 12, 2012 at 08:43 AM

    You contradict yourself in one paragraph, AND you live in the utter toilet that is London. Please go die.


    Posted By: Frank (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 01:57 PM

     
     
    I can get not agreeing with why WWE doesn't hold PPV's oversees, but not getting it? Two words Time Zone. WWE's largest, highest paying audience is in North America. They want a prime time audience, because that's the largest number of buys. To get a 7pm start time in NY would mean a 1am start in England and that means it starts at 4pm on the West Coast.

    Let's say they went for a 9pm start time in England. That's 4pm on the east coast and 1pm on the west coast of the US. From Sept-Jan that would just be suicide due to football. During the rest of the year, it's still up against other sports that will hold special Sunday day games. Also take into account that weekend days are the only times most people have to get errands and work around the house done.

    I amazes me how people think their the first person to have such an idea. Do you really think WWE hasn't considered this sort of thing and done a cost analysis on it?

    I'd agree that TNA would probably have little to lose on this sort of thing since their PPV buys are virtually non-existent. I just don't know what the PPV business or equivalent is like in England.

    Posted By: Carl (Guest) on January 12, 2012 at 10:38 AM

    You're working under the assumption that North American audiences must see a PPV live. Overseas Raws are shown delayed a few hours. SummerSlam 92 was delayed a couple of days. (per Wikipedia)


    Posted By: Guest#0573 (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 02:16 PM

     
     
    I can get not agreeing with why WWE doesn't hold PPV's oversees, but not getting it? Two words Time Zone. WWE's largest, highest paying audience is in North America. They want a prime time audience, because that's the largest number of buys. To get a 7pm start time in NY would mean a 1am start in England and that means it starts at 4pm on the West Coast.

    Let's say they went for a 9pm start time in England. That's 4pm on the east coast and 1pm on the west coast of the US. From Sept-Jan that would just be suicide due to football. During the rest of the year, it's still up against other sports that will hold special Sunday day games. Also take into account that weekend days are the only times most people have to get errands and work around the house done.

    I amazes me how people think their the first person to have such an idea. Do you really think WWE hasn't considered this sort of thing and done a cost analysis on it?

    I'd agree that TNA would probably have little to lose on this sort of thing since their PPV buys are virtually non-existent. I just don't know what the PPV business or equivalent is like in England.

    Posted By: Carl (Guest) on January 12, 2012 at 10:38 AM

    ------------

    Taped Delay says hi and if people want to watch it live in N.America they can watch it online.

    Also PPVs outside N.America can easily work. Summerslam 92 highest selling summerslam pre Attitude era. Filled up Wembly which for a football match could hold over 80k. Not sure what the true audience was but 90k was easily attainable considering how far away the pitch was to the fans, with the ring in the centre of the pitch and the fans build up where the rest of the pitch was then I wouldn't be surprise that WWE plays down the true audience count to make their Wrestlemania myth sound more true.


    Posted By: Guest#3211 (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 02:39 PM

     
     
    Brodus Clay isn't a very good worker as of right now, but he has quite a bit of charisma and can definitely work the stick.

    Posted By: Andis (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 03:24 PM

     
     
    Any chance that Brodus Clay comes back next week with a different gimmick? Have him run through all of the stereotypical gimmicks the WWE/WWF have given black wrestlers over the years?

    - Godfather
    - Umaga
    - JYD
    - Koko B Ware
    - Farooq

    And the last one being Booker T. The have him do a shoot promo on how the WWE has poorly portrayed black wrestlers over the years. They even ran an angle where HHH acted in a racist way towards Booker T, and in the end, HHH won that angle. And yet, Booker T is now back kissing HHH's ass.

    Posted By: SpankyHamm (Guest) on January 12, 2012 at 09:29 AM

    Yeah, those poor black fellas huh...getting paid hundreds of thousands of dollars a year with a gun to their heads, forced to play black stereotypes. It's a travesty that the WWE never made any of their white wrestlers do the same...imagine HHH pretending to be a snobby Ivy League douche! Or Kurt Angle looking like a frat-boy head of a wrestling team...or Steve Austin, the Undertaker and the Godwinns being portrayed as white trash hillbilly hard-asses...WWE really need to get their act together on the whole racial equality thing right?


    Posted By: Duh (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 04:16 PM

     
     
    Tna is only bigger in the uk because its on free tv. Wwe is on sky tv which you have to subscribe to.

    Posted By: PdM (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 06:04 PM

     
     
    There was skit on SNL. A Cee Lo Green parody, and they had a character in that Skit named Funkasaurus.

    Brodus Clay's character is a rip off from that.

    Posted By: lodog (Guest) on January 11, 2012 at 11:30 PM

    Charlie Day was called Freakasaurus and dressed up like a dinosaur. Pretty much NOTHING like what Brodus did. Fucking douche.

    Posted By: Oh My! (Guest) on January 12, 2012 at 01:00 AM

    I'm pretty sure if that skit never aired he'd have a different gimmick. He was definatly dancing around to funk music with 2 beautiful ladies. It's just different enough to get by.

    I'm just saying that what seems like an original idea from the E really isn't.

    I'm just excited to get another superstar that looks different from the rest.


    Posted By: Lodog (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 06:29 PM

     
     
    Y2J! Y2J! Y2J!

    All you TNA fans are retards who don't get it! Jericho is brilliant! And way to good for crappy no fun tna. WWE rules!!!


    Posted By: Elvylanda (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 07:09 PM

     
     
    I am on the Funkasaurus bandwagon.

    WWE!!!!!!


    Posted By: Elvylanda (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 07:09 PM

     
     
    "Yawn...

    Steve Cook has not only killed 411's credibility with introducing a certain new "writer," but he has now effectively destroyed Fact or Fiction.

    Congrats Cook! How long until Larry has to "save" this feature, like he did with the 4 R's?

    Posted By: Guest#3206 (Guest) on January 11, 2012 at 11:51 PM"

    Why do people claim that things they don't like have lost "credibility," and that their opinions are the same as the entire IWC?

    It's alright to have an opinion; it's even better to know how to separate that opinion from fact. You're not the Voice of Legion, speaking for everyone and letting 411mania know how much or little credibility it has.

    Hate to target you, but I just saw that post as a microcosm of the IWC's worst stereotypes being reinforced.

    Great column, fellas. I don't mind the 8 for 8 finish. It's kinda funny; after seeing so many contrarians on the site disagree for the sake of disagreeing, and so many pairings of people we KNOW are at odds on everything, it's become the norm. Now, seeing two people actually agree on something is the breath of fresh air (or "it's different, now it sucks," if you wanna be negative about it).

    Posted By: E. E. Faulk (Guest) on January 12, 2012 at 01:40 AM


    I like you.


    Posted By: Guest#7472 (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 07:11 PM

     
     
    "TNA, for whatever reason, is really big in the UK."

    Erm, sorry, no it isn't. It is virtually unknown over here.

    Posted By: DarthDaver (Guest) on January 12, 2012 at 05:55 AM

    No shit. I like how 225,000 people out of 49,000,000 people is "really big".


    Posted By: Guest#8925 (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 07:14 PM

     
     
    Brodus Clay is a shit worker. He's far too green and he lacks genuine talent.

    Posted By: RobMinion (Registered) on January 12, 2012 at 06:42 AM

    Hmmm, well considering he wrestled about 5 times on TV and has been off camera for a couple months, my question to you is, where have you been catching all his matches at?

    Posted By: LOSER (Guest) on January 12, 2012 at 11:57 AM

    In his own deluded mind where most of the IWC lives.


    Posted By: Oh My! (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 07:19 PM

     
     
    FUNKASAURUS WRECKS!!!

    Posted By: Finish 'er (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 07:21 PM

     
     
    Any chance that Brodus Clay comes back next week with a different gimmick? Have him run through all of the stereotypical gimmicks the WWE/WWF have given black wrestlers over the years?

    - Godfather
    - Umaga
    - JYD
    - Koko B Ware
    - Farooq

    And the last one being Booker T. The have him do a shoot promo on how the WWE has poorly portrayed black wrestlers over the years. They even ran an angle where HHH acted in a racist way towards Booker T, and in the end, HHH won that angle. And yet, Booker T is now back kissing HHH's ass.

    Posted By: SpankyHamm (Guest) on January 12, 2012 at 09:29 AM

    Yeah, those poor black fellas huh...getting paid hundreds of thousands of dollars a year with a gun to their heads, forced to play black stereotypes. It's a travesty that the WWE never made any of their white wrestlers do the same...imagine HHH pretending to be a snobby Ivy League douche! Or Kurt Angle looking like a frat-boy head of a wrestling team...or Steve Austin, the Undertaker and the Godwinns being portrayed as white trash hillbilly hard-asses...WWE really need to get their act together on the whole racial equality thing right?

    Posted By: Duh (Guest) on January 12, 2012 at 04:16 PM


    Ummm - hello?

    As part of an angle. You know, like how CM Punk calling out the McMahons. I'm not saying it's true (although it is), but from an angle standpoint, recognizing that there has been a perception of racism, just like a perception of Vince hating the smaller or indy guys.


    Posted By: SpankyHamm (Guest)  on January 12, 2012 at 07:44 PM

     
     
    Here is a good Fact or Fiction question: Johnny Ace < Mike Adamle?

    Posted By: Guest#8306 (Guest)  on January 13, 2012 at 03:54 AM

     
     
    FACT: If Brodus Clay debuted in TNA using this same new gimmick, these same "writers" would crap all over it.
    FACT: If Jericho debuted in TNA and used this same "no talking" gimmick, these same writers would crap all over it.
    This is really getting pathetic. Wait, no, actually, its ALREADY pathetic.


    Posted By: REALITY (Guest)  on January 13, 2012 at 03:18 PM

     
     
    FACT: If Brodus Clay debuted in TNA using this same new gimmick, these same "writers" would crap all over it.
    FACT: If Jericho debuted in TNA and used this same "no talking" gimmick, these same writers would crap all over it.
    This is really getting pathetic. Wait, no, actually, its ALREADY pathetic.

    Posted By: REALITY (Guest) on January 13, 2012 at 03:18 PM

    You're right, your constant whining is pathetic.


    Posted By: Guest#0092 (Guest)  on January 13, 2012 at 07:16 PM

     
     
    Is the WWE Network gonna be on DirecTV?

    Posted By: TJ Fan (Guest)  on January 14, 2012 at 01:59 AM

     
     
    TNA is nowhere near as big as the WWE in the UK.
    The only reason it get bigger ratings is its on a free channel, its on at an earlier time (9 pm) and it's shown on a Sunday when there's virtually nothing interesting enough to watch.
    Whereas WWE shows on a Tuesday Morning at 2 am, when most people are in bed on a channel that has to be paid for
    These are the reasons why TNA gets more viewers than WWE.
    Dont listen to Wes Kirk and the other TNA morons, who thinks everyone in the UK loves TNA. We dont!


    Posted By: The Voice Of Reason (Guest)  on January 14, 2012 at 10:29 AM

     


  • www.41mania.com
    Copyright (c) 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
    Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
    Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.