411's Instant Analysis 1/20/2012: Friday Night Smackdown
Posted by David McGregor on 01.20.2012
It is Sin City Smackdown this week as Daniel Bryan faces off against Mark Henry in a Lumberjack Match for the World Heavyweight Championship. Also we have the return of WWE Roulette as we have a rarely seen Tornado Tag Match and a rarely bareable Blindfold Match! It isn't as bad as it sounds, honest...
Welcome to the Instant Analysis of Friday Night Smackdown, last week I was stuck in a hospital bed and was unable to review the show so that is why there was no column last week. But I'm back and there aren't any foreseeable things in the future so the column should be on time from now on. Anyway last week wasn't exactly Smackdown at its best, although Daniel Bryan is blossoming as a heel. This week is the return of Raw Roulette, although seen as it's on Smackdown I guess it's Smackdown Roulette which although it has produced some stinkers in terms of matches it's a concept I thing is great and I am looking forward to this one. So let's get started with Sin City Smackdown!
Opening Segment: Daniel Bryan seems to hate everyone!
I am really enjoying Daniel Bryan's heel turn he seems to be one of the few bright lights on an otherwise dull Smackdown recently. I think we can just say now the he is a fully fledged heel there is no if ands or maybes about in anymore the crowd just seem to hate him! I haven't seen his ROH stuff so I didn't know if he could pull off being the heel but he is doing it very well and it is basically saving the angle with Big Show and Mark Henry, it's an interesting twist on the David and Goliath story. The promo built Bryan up as a heel as well as his match with Henry and his feud with the Big Show as well as being entertaining so I can't fault it.
Rating: 8.5 out of 10
Backstage Segment – The Trolls Luck Ran Out!
Now I said I like the Roulette gimmick but not when future superstars like Cody Rhodes are put into matches with bloody leprechauns! At least that is semi logical, why waste your time fighting someone that could injure you such as Sheamus or Ezekiel Jackson when you could just beat up a midget. Also seen as we are 9 days away from the Royal Rumble and the 2nd biggest night of the year I guess it makes sense to keep injury free.
However the Aksana stuff with Teddy Long is boring me senseless! It seems like the WWE locker room is just filled with couples these days, of which only Bryan and AJ have been of any storyline use. General Managers should just manage their brand they dont need to be fornicating with every eastern European he can lay his hands on.
Rating: 4 out of 10
Cody Rhodes v Hornswoggle (Make that Justin Gabriel)
Now I can let this one go because it is really just to make Rhodes look like a bastard, which is funny seen as Hornswoggle used to be called the little bastard. Also the actual Hornswoggle match barely lasted 30 seconds with Gabriel coming to the aid of the little one once again. I would complain but at least it gets a talented guy like Gabriel on the show, his 450 splash is a thing of beauty only second to Evan Bourne's Shooting Star Press (off topic the guy is an idiot for screwing up again, your employer says you dont do something you dont do it! How arrogant do you have to be to just casually continue to screw up a 6 figure salary job?). The match was short and sweet; Gabriel looked like he was on par with Rhodes until the end and I think he was elevated by the defeat. Rhodes once again looks like a dominant champion and I can see him very soon dropping the belt for bigger and better things I think he will be World Champion by the end of the year.
After the match Mark Henry spun the wheel for a lumberjack match, I find it amazing how much Henry has improved I just think he is captivating as the dominant heel. He's also became somewhat charismatic as his time at the announce table showed a few weeks ago.
Winner: Cody Rhodes
Rating: 7 out of 10
Epico and Primo (w/ Rosa Mendes) v The Uso's – Tornado Tag Team Match
Even though Tornado Tag Team matches are a long established type of match they are rarely seen and I think thats a shame because they can be very entertaining, a problem normal tag team matches tend to suffer from. This was a short one but it was a decent encounter and added a little legitimacy to Epico and Primo's reign as Tag Team Champions. An entertaining match with a under used gimmick is exactly what the Tag Team division needs to revitalise it, good work indeed.
Winners: Epico and Primo
Rating: 6.5 out of 10
Brodus Clay v Vickie Guerrero and William Regal – Dance Off
Now I know a lot of people will moan this was a waste of time and all but when you sit down and watch this it is actually entertaining and funny! Vickie and her dancing had me in stitches with laughter and she seems to get heat for everything she does its unbelievable even if it is just completely outrageous like this. Clay and his dance moves were hilarious, although he totally cheated by using his dancers! Regal and his dancing was plain funny and even though it was a brilliant technical wrestler wasting himself I found it funny and got Brodus over a little more. It was pointless but it was more entertaining than pretty much all of last week's show!
Winner: The Funkasaurus Brodus Clay
Rating: 8 out of 10 (I'm sorry I found it funny!)
Sheamus v Wade Barrett – Tables Match
I don't know why but my link to this one seemed to start mid way through I don't know if anything happened at the start but if it did then I missed it. These 2 have been on a roll recently and I feel that this match is a much bigger match than the World Heavyweight Championship match that is scheduled as it is two guys who the WWE seem to have invested a lot into going toe to toe to see who the best man is. Well that was the case until it was made a table match as it has become an established fact that table's matches are used predominantly so the WWE can book a dirty finish. Shockingly that was the case here as well as Jinder Mahal reared his ugly untalented face once again to cost Sheamus the match. I was quite surprised they gave Barrett the win here as Sheamus seems to be on a little winning streak while they build him back up. Decent match but once again ruined by Mahal's appearance.
Winner Wade Barrett
Rating: 6 out of 10
Hunico v Ted Diabise – Flag Match
See there are some gimmick matches that aren't used a lot yet have the potential to be fantastic, such as the tornado tag match, then there are gimmick matches that you understand why they aren't used very much such as this heap, and funnily enough the next match also. I am getting sick of this whole thing I just feel like it is the same people in the same matches every single week with the same things happening! Hunico and Ted Dibiase had a match which sucked just the other week is there really any need for them to have another sucktacular match once again? This one sucked pure and simple and as long as Dibiase is feuding with Hunico with love for sparkly shiny bicycles he isn't getting anywhere fast! Boring and added nothing to their horrible feud.
Winner: Ted Dibiase
Rating: 3 out of 10
Santino Marella v Drew McIntyre – Blindfold Match
There are stipulation matches that shouldn't be used often, like the Flag Match which can further a feud if done right, then there are match types that just plain suck and should never be used and a blindfold match is one of them! I have never seen a decent, not even good just decent, blindfold match and this wasn't the exception. Unlike the dance off earlier this isn't entertaining and wasn't funny in the slightest, it just made me feel sorry for Drew McIntyre who has fallen so far since his days of being handpicked for greatness by Mr McMahon (which seems to be a sign your career is screwed more than anything). This is again another rehashed match from a couple weeks ago, sometimes it's like watching a rerun of a previous show watching Smackdown sometimes especially when it's this bad!
Winner: Santino Marella
Rating: 2 out of 10
Daniel Bryan v Mark Henry – World Heavyweight Title Lumberjack Match
This wasnt exactly the greatest match ive ever seen but for a TV main event it was enjoyable. And more important it furthered feuds between Henry, Bryan and Big Show which is resulting in a Triple Threat Steel Cage Match at the Rumble. I think that fits perfectly into the angle they are going with for these guys and I guess the match will show if the WWE really are behind Bryan as world champion.
As for the match, it was decent with Henry still not being 100% this was as good as we were going to get but the inclusion of the lumberjacks and the eventual brawl at the end made this a lot better, the whole thing was better than the sum of its parts as it further angles and built towards the Rumble all in one match. The brawl at the end isn't creative but its always my favourite way to build to the Royal Rumble!
Winner: N/A
Rating: 9 out of 10 (The match wasnt great but the build towards everything else was great)
FINAL THOUGHTS
Moment of the Night Daniel Bryan v Mark Henry – More angle than match
Trash of the Night Santino Marella v Drew McIntyre
Show Analysis - Ive always been a fan of the themed shows in fact Retro Raw back in 2010 was one of my all time favourite Raw episodes. While this wasnt anywhere near as good as that I did enjoy this episode, although I feel that this seemed more like a go home show before the Royal Rumble as opposed to a Smackdown 9 days before the actual show. While there was some crap here such as the flag match and the blindfold match those sort of come part in parcel with the roulette idea so I can almost forgive their involvement, however, I do feel that sometimes a gimmick like this could be used so much better. But we are officially on the Road to Wrestlemania so I am guessing there is a lot better to come.
And that is it for this week I'm David McGregor and this has been the Instant Analysis of Friday Night Smackdown!
This reviewer is fucking awful. Please get somebody else to do this Instant Analysis column.
Posted By: Wow. (Guest) on January 20, 2012 at 10:19 PM
brodus clay is amazing. CHEA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted By: Guest#6753 (Guest) on January 20, 2012 at 10:31 PM
this was such a good show. boycott TNA.
Posted By: Guest#4946 (Guest) on January 20, 2012 at 10:32 PM
I actually enjoyed the flag match quite a bit. Crowd seemed way into DiBiase - I think this Posse tailgating gimmick is actually getting over. I'm starting to get into DiBiase as a face, which is saying something because I have never been into DiBiase ever.
To be fair, I think you missed the 'charm' of the Sin City stipulation. Flag matches and Blindfold matches and the such *are* completely ridiculous, which is why they are fun gimmicks to bust out on a show like this. If every gimmick selected tonight perfectly fit the feud, it would defeat the "spin-the-wheel" random wackiness.
Posted By: The TradeMark Experience (Guest) on January 20, 2012 at 10:34 PM
Hunico vs Dibiase was a quick yet entertaining match.
Santino vs McIntyre was nothing but inoffensive hilarity.
Posted By: SS87 (Guest) on January 20, 2012 at 11:00 PM
Its 2012, its rather easy to go see some previous work of pretty much any wrestler in the WWE right now. Just do a little research and see how DB was as a heel in ROH. C'mon man get with the program.
Posted By: Guest#6382 (Guest) on January 20, 2012 at 11:39 PM
Cody has been one of my favorite wrestlers all year, and I am enjoying the way they are booking him. Sinister and devious, but ultimately able to back it up. Also enjoying Daniel Bryans heel turn. Showing a lot of charisma for someone who supposedly has none.
And I'm loving the Funkasaurus as well. It's fun and Brodus is making it work. That's what good performers do.
Posted By: Guest#6926 (Guest) on January 20, 2012 at 11:47 PM
Yeah, it was the crowd and not that piped in crowd noise. I mean, when you see fifty people on the camera just staring at the ring and you hear loud cheering over the speakers it is perfectly normal...
Posted By: Wes Kirk (Registered) on January 20, 2012 at 11:47 PM
"This reviewer is fucking awful. Please get somebody else to do this Instant Analysis column."
Posted By: Wow. (Guest) on January 20, 2012 at 10:19 PM
Besides not knowing about Danielson's previous heel work, it's the same columnist who admitted "not having an opinion on Eddie Guerrero until 2005" in an article a few weeks ago. 411 is really lowering the bar these days.
Posted By: Guest #1121 (Guest) on January 21, 2012 at 12:10 AM
Yeah, it was the crowd and not that piped in crowd noise. I mean, when you see fifty people on the camera just staring at the ring and you hear loud cheering over the speakers it is perfectly normal...
Posted By: Wes Kirk (Registered) on January 20, 2012 at 11:47 PM
Go to bed Wes! You already posted your trolling article of the week - your work is done.
Posted By: Guest#3911 (Guest) on January 21, 2012 at 12:20 AM
Yeah, it was the crowd and not that piped in crowd noise. I mean, when you see fifty people on the camera just staring at the ring and you hear loud cheering over the speakers it is perfectly normal...
Posted By: Wes Kirk (Registered) on January 20, 2012 at 11:47 PM
You're a writer on this site, aren't you supposed to be, you know, above being a troll in the comments section?
Posted By: Guest#5002 (Guest) on January 21, 2012 at 12:46 AM
Yeah, it was the crowd and not that piped in crowd noise. I mean, when you see fifty people on the camera just staring at the ring and you hear loud cheering over the speakers it is perfectly normal...
Posted By: Wes Kirk (Registered) on January 20, 2012 at 11:47
I'm not sure Wes understands the concept of arena noise...and also that just because you 50 people not reacting as much doesn't speak for the other thousands....asshole
Posted By: Michael Bolton (Guest) on January 21, 2012 at 02:04 AM
Pretty good show with some funny stuff. It gets taken down with the lack of good wrestling, but a lot of storyline progression. I'm starting to like Brodus and Regal was hilarious. I like the way Rhodes and DB are used as heels, and how DB has slowly going from face to heel. He tries to act like a face, but he is turning into a dick heel. I wonder if he is going to start dating Katlin while AJ is hurt, to be even more of a dick heel.
Oh, and WK, you should stop. Your trolling is old news and is now comical. I'm also done reading your garbage column, it's not worth my time.
Posted By: Still Guest#8287 (Guest) on January 21, 2012 at 02:23 AM
WWE trolls are in full force tonight. this show sucked balls.
Posted By: Guest#0415 (Guest) on January 21, 2012 at 02:27 AM
Yeah, I'm not going to hate on this guys opinions or anything, but he's a poor writer. I mean that from a technical standpoint. He types like a teenager.
Posted By: Sabotage (Guest) on January 21, 2012 at 04:53 AM
Yeah, it was the crowd and not that piped in crowd noise. I mean, when you see fifty people on the camera just staring at the ring and you hear loud cheering over the speakers it is perfectly normal...
Posted By: Wes Kirk (Registered) on January 20, 2012 at 11:47 PM
Like that huge heat Magnus & Samoa Joe were getting on Impact while the actual crowd was clearly sitting on their hands?
Posted By: Guest#5132 (Guest) on January 21, 2012 at 08:46 AM
This reviewer is fucking awful. Please get somebody else to do this Instant Analysis column.
Posted By: Wow. (Guest) on January 20, 2012 at 10:19 PM
=================
really can't see anything wrong with him. enjoyed this column.
Posted By: Guest#4664 (Guest) on January 21, 2012 at 10:24 AM
While I could have researched Bryan Danielson I dont see why its necessary to the analysis of Smackdown. ROH isnt mandatory viewing for every wrestling fan you know.
Posted By: David McGregor (Registered) on January 21, 2012 at 10:38 AM
Concernig Bourne, I thought the wrestlers weren't "employees", but "indepentent contractors".
Posted By: The Great Capt. Smooth (Guest) on January 21, 2012 at 10:48 AM
While I could have researched Bryan Danielson I don't see why its necessary to the analysis of Smackdown. ROH isnt mandatory viewing for every wrestling fan you know.
Posted By: David McGregor (Registered) on January 21, 2012 at 10:38 AM
It's not necessary, but it would provide greater insight to your analysis of the show and Danielson's character. Seeing his ROH stuff explains why his current heel character is working.
Posted By: Nick M. (Guest) on January 21, 2012 at 02:49 PM
I think this writer did just fine.
Posted By: Jason (Guest) on January 21, 2012 at 03:40 PM
Daniel Bryan's promo truly deserved a 8.5 but having the lumbering waste of space Mark Henry in the main event is an automatic 0.0 for not just that segment but the whole show itself which was full of mostly 4.0 segments at best.
Posted By: Guest#0530 (Guest) on January 21, 2012 at 04:23 PM
Yeah, it was the crowd and not that piped in crowd noise. I mean, when you see fifty people on the camera just staring at the ring and you hear loud cheering over the speakers it is perfectly normal...
Posted By: Wes Kirk (Registered) on January 20, 2012 at 11:47
Honestly, how on earth do you have a column on this site? God, you're so fucking useless.
Posted By: Guest#1167 (Guest) on January 21, 2012 at 05:29 PM
Pretty good show overall I thought. Bryan's gotten more over as a heel in three weeks than he did of almost two years being a face.
Smackdown really needs a few more marquee names though. It'll help to have Orton and Christian back. Then maybe have Del Rio get traded over or something. It just seems a little light on talent.
Posted By: Guest#4342 (Guest) on January 21, 2012 at 06:08 PM
"Yeah, it was the crowd and not that piped in crowd noise. I mean, when you see fifty people on the camera just staring at the ring and you hear loud cheering over the speakers it is perfectly normal...
Posted By: Wes Kirk (Registered) on January 20, 2012 at 11:47 PM"
Yep, I notice this whenever I watch Impact.
"You're a writer on this site, aren't you supposed to be, you know, above being a troll in the comments section?
Posted By: Guest#5002 (Guest) on January 21, 2012 at 12:46 AM"
Being a troll is Kirk's main purpose on this site. Don't get mad at him. Get mad at the person(s) who hired him for the site.
Posted By: mogamer (Guest) on January 21, 2012 at 06:14 PM
I disagree about the Blindfold match. No, it wasn't a good match, but it was every bit as good as the Dance Off (minus Wild Bill Regal's apperance). It got the crowd involved, and Drew's misses on Santino were pretty entertaining.
Good show, not anywhere near great, but entertaining in a pervese sense.
Posted By: G-Walla (Guest) on January 21, 2012 at 06:17 PM
While I could have researched Bryan Danielson I don't see why its necessary to the analysis of Smackdown. ROH isnt mandatory viewing for every wrestling fan you know.
Posted By: David McGregor (Registered) on January 21, 2012 at 10:38 AM
It's not necessary, but it would provide greater insight to your analysis of the show and Danielson's character. Seeing his ROH stuff explains why his current heel character is working.
Posted By: Nick M. (Guest) on January 21, 2012 at 02:49 PM
=============
I don't agree with this at all. Bryan's character, for me, is completely understandable without any knowledge of ROH. I think having an in-depth understanding of his previous heel turn/work is only relevant if you're comparing and contrasting - this recapper isn't doing that, and comparing and contrasting would only help understand why his heel turn in ROH wasn't greatly receive.
Once again with this site I think a commenter is unhappy that a writer doesn't have his in-depth knowledge. Sorry to point this out to you, but it's not needed for writing in the wwe world.
And Wes Kirk (although it could have been anyone using his name), please grow up. Throwing your support behind a dying company and criticizing a more successfully one is just plain embarrassing. You're not 13.
Posted By: Guest#6164 (Guest) on January 21, 2012 at 06:47 PM
"I don't agree with this at all. Bryan's character, for me, is completely understandable without any knowledge of ROH. I think having an in-depth understanding of his previous heel turn/work is only relevant if you're comparing and contrasting - this recapper isn't doing that, and comparing and contrasting would only help understand why his heel turn in ROH wasn't greatly received.
Once again with this site I think a commenter is unhappy that a writer doesn't have his in-depth knowledge. Sorry to point this out to you, but it's not needed for writing in the wwe world."
Posted By: Guest#6164 (Guest) on January 21, 2012 at 06:47 PM
Did you not read where I said it was "not necessary"? I never claimed it was required viewing, only that it would help to show the reviewer why Danielson is talented at playing a heel.
If you want to oppose my view, that's fine - all I ask is that you read it thoroughly first. I equally oppose yours, but I at least took the time to read your response.
Posted By: Nick M. (Guest) on January 22, 2012 at 12:54 PM
Did you not read where I said it was "not necessary"? I never claimed it was required viewing, only that it would help to show the reviewer why Danielson is talented at playing a heel.
If you want to oppose my view, that's fine - all I ask is that you read it thoroughly first. I equally oppose yours, but I at least took the time to read your response.
Posted By: Nick M. (Guest) on January 22, 2012 at 12:54 PM
You seem to quite pedantic - possibly because you've realised a fault in your argument. Please point out where I claimed that you wrote 'required viewing'. You spoke about 'greater insight' and I stated that it wasn't needed to understand Bryan's current turn and character. I really doubt you'll reply to this as you're making a bit of a fool of yourself, but I'll reiterate my first comment -
You do not need to have seen ROH to understand the WWE better. The WWE is it's own entity - a massive juggernaut that provides outside snippets and explains them to the viewer when they feel the need to. This recapper does not need that 'insight' into past wrestling events outside of the WWE, because the WWE is pretty much self-contained. If you were comparing the two brands, or writing a bio on a wrestler, then yes, knowing the history would be important. This is a column on a weekly 2 hour wrestling show.
Please read all my comment next time before getting in a twist.
Posted By: Guest#2373 (Guest) on January 22, 2012 at 06:27 PM
"You seem to quite pedantic - possibly because you've realised a fault in your argument. Please point out where I claimed that you wrote 'required viewing'. You spoke about 'greater insight' and I stated that it wasn't needed to understand Bryan's current turn and character. I really doubt you'll reply to this as you're making a bit of a fool of yourself, but I'll reiterate my first comment -
You do not need to have seen ROH to understand the WWE better. The WWE is it's own entity - a massive juggernaut that provides outside snippets and explains them to the viewer when they feel the need to. This recapper does not need that 'insight' into past wrestling events outside of the WWE, because the WWE is pretty much self-contained. If you were comparing the two brands, or writing a bio on a wrestler, then yes, knowing the history would be important. This is a column on a weekly 2 hour wrestling show.
Please read all my comment next time before getting in a twist."
There is no flaw in my argument, and here is where yours leaves the rails:
"I think having an in-depth understanding of his previous heel turn/work is only relevant if you're comparing and contrasting - this recapper isn't doing that, and comparing and contrasting would only help understand why his heel turn in ROH wasn't greatly received."
This ISN'T about comparing and contrasting - it's about a review of this show, and the FACT that Danielson's previous heel work is a direct influence on what he's doing now in WWE. If you've even seen one iota of ROH during that run of his (which you apparently haven't), it's undeniable. And your claim that Danielson's heel run "wasn't greatly received" in ROH? As it could be said on your side of the pond, pure bollocks...he was THE top heel in that company at that time.
David McGregor *isn't required* to have known Danielson's past in ROH, but I believe the extra info would only help add to the depth and quality of his review (which was actually pretty good). The only one making a fool of themselves is you.
Posted By: Nick M. (Guest) on January 22, 2012 at 09:13 PM
Hmmm. Yes, shallow and pedantic.
Posted By: Peter (Guest) on January 23, 2012 at 12:48 AM
"There is no flaw in my argument"
============
Once again, please feel free to point out where I stated you claimed it was 'required viewing'. I did sort of ask you to do it in your last post, but you just went on a bit of a ramble.
"David McGregor *isn't required* to have known Danielson's past in ROH, but I believe the extra info would only help add to the depth and quality of his review"
I think this is where you're going wrong. It's not a review, if it was your comments may be valid. It's an instant analysis of current events. I understand you believe that delving into Bryans' past will help this recapper 'get' bryan more, my point is he doesn't need to get' him more to write this article. You haven't once stated how it would help him, over than it will. And I think that speaks volumes.
It's quite clear you have your panties in a bit of a twist here, so I'll leave it at this. It's been fun.
Posted By: Guest#8357 (Guest) on January 23, 2012 at 01:01 AM
I'm a little bummed that there's no title involved in Barrett/Sheamus. They're kind of between the mid card and main event. This could have been one of those feuds like Rock/Austin, which started with the IC title and then moved to the WWE Title.
I can definitely see these guys having one of those special feuds that never really ends, but just runs hot and cold over the years.
Posted By: Carl (Guest) on January 23, 2012 at 10:02 AM
Copyright (c) 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.